Emfuser Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Why are individuals REALLY shamed for supporting this community? I did not say they were the "worst". What I wrote is "generally seen as negative", which is a statement describing perception by the public based on some sort of group association.	/r/MensRights	21/11/23 02:38 PM
40	Why are individuals REALLY shamed for supporting this community? The short answer is because western society is currently dominated by a cultural narrative and ideology that holds men responsible as the primary "oppressor" class of human civilization. As a result any expressed thought, opinion, or action in support of men is held by default to be support of an oppressor and thus morally wrong. That same narrative quite purposely conflates the worst aspects of any sort of mens movement generally seen as negative such as involuntarily celibate men (incels), red…	/r/MensRights	20/11/23 03:40 PM
2	Just a reminder that Reddit is totally fine with harassment, bullying and threats of violence as long as they are directed towards white men. Wokeness provides a social and moral hierarchy in the form of intersectionalism. Guess who is at the bottom? Since the reddit administration has woke as their effective moral operating system you cannot expect this to get better in the foreseeable future.	/r/MensRights	22/08/22 08:55 PM
3	100% Female Quota Want to enact a resentment-driven ideology to punish those your ideology disfavors? Just replace the phrase "demographic retribution" with the phrase "positive discrimination" and voila! You fool enough of the population into going along with punishing your enemies to make it the law.	/r/MensRights	12/08/22 02:56 PM
2	Why is there no rule for hate against men in feminist subs? Because of doublespeak. In the internal language of Wokeness "hate" describes any expression that contradicts or criticizes their belief system and its underlying presumptions. Used externally, it seems to mean what "hate" would normally mean in regular English parlance. So, it's doublespeak. It's an internally consistent use of the word to the Woke because disdain for and discrimination against men is inline with their narrative.	/r/MensRights	31/05/22 02:09 PM
2	r/AskReddit moderators aside.. It's impossible in todays society to talk about men's issues without HAVING to talk about women's issues. The answer is very simple: it violates their narrative. Anything that violates their narrative is perfectly acceptable to censor or attack.	/r/MensRights	12/03/22 11:33 PM
1	More blatant misandry from radical feminists and TERFs on Twitter A bunch of mentally unwell cultists fighting with each other over their (literally) meaningless language preferences and beliefs that came about as a result of their un-mooring of everything from any sense of objective morality. Sucks for them.	/r/MensRights	11/03/22 02:22 PM
30	Does anyone know when we will get out of this “woke” phase? We currently are in a cultural revolution that is basically modeled off of Mao's cultural revolution in China. The woke control the great bulk of academia, the news media, entertainment. They've gained strong footholds in government, but particularly the federal and blue or purple state governments. They've gained footholds at most large corporations (look for any diversity, inclusion, and equity ANYTHING at your company) and their flag flies everywhere. The longer people agree that it's not a b…	/r/MensRights	15/12/21 03:02 PM
3	Newcastle councillor suspended for "sexist" tweet highlighting lack of gender balance in 70% female council For those who do not understand PC/SJW newspeak it should be clarified that "diversity" always means more of what they prefer and less of what they don't and it only goes one direction.	/r/MensRights	27/06/20 07:38 PM
1	Screen Shot Of Me Confronting My Fellow Female Atheists On Reddit About False Sexual Assault Allegations In The Atheist Community It's probably worth pointing out that the broader western skeptic/atheist community was the first large online online community where intersectional ideologies were able to establish a beachhead to infiltrate and take control of a community by establishing an intersectional narrative as the effective operating system so they could drive out non-believers. It's quite ironic if you think about it.	/r/MensRights	12/04/20 07:00 PM
40	I was reprimanded by HR after coworker complained that I gave her a bad annual review. Update 2: r/legaladvice recommended that HR is not required to be fair. Also, that I am implicitly biased and should go for the implicit bias training in good faith. I guess this would be the best course of action for me now. "Implicit Bias" training and the studies that support it have been effectively discredited. It's just an ideological tool used by HR departments that have become ideological beach-heads for inserting social justice beliefs into corporations. HR isn't going to protect you. T…	/r/MensRights	11/03/20 12:02 AM
2	The claim that abortion would be totally legal if men could get pregnant is baffling to me It's nothing more than an Appeal to Spite. https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Appeal-to-Spite	/r/MensRights	09/03/20 03:00 PM
31	Twitter Violates Their Own Rules "Rules for thee but not for me." is a pretty standard MO for acolytes of Woke. Not good, obviously, but you'll see it everywhere with these people.	/r/MensRights	09/03/20 02:51 PM
30	Japanese woman to white women This is just biology. Nothing more. To a society of even the most basic social organization. You cannot further your family, your tribe, your village, your town, city or nation if you cannot reproduce. Comparatively speaking, viable wombs and eggs are rare and biologically quite costly and sperm are cheap, plentiful, and available from men at any time for several decades. Women can bear children for about 20-25 years on the average, only get ~12 shots per year when not pregnant, and have a defin…	/r/MensRights	19/02/20 02:18 PM
52	Japanese woman to white women "men start well below women and have to prove that they are worth it." This right here is worth highlight because it's true. Because of how we evolved both biologically and then as we developed successful civilization, women are inherently valuable for their womb. Their most valuable natural asset, their physical attractiveness, is front-loaded so that they are able to reproduce quickly in their most able years. Men absolutely start well below women and have to prove their worth and utility. Men…	/r/MensRights	19/02/20 02:02 PM
2	Homeless shelter originally slated to house single men to become women only shelter after backlash. Feminists have been conditioned and thus condition others to view this sort of thing as a zero-sum struggle between men and women. Therefore if men are getting something it is necessarily being taken from women. Therefore outrage and shrieking.	/r/MensRights	16/10/19 07:04 PM
2	Twitter is the worst (over 27k likes) "I blasphemed earlier. Sorry about that. Please accept my obsequious, hyperbolic prostration before the altar of Social Justice."	/r/MensRights	24/09/19 02:36 PM
1	Justifying ruining someone’s life for no reason because of stress Which is precisely what makes a Poe. When you read something that seems ridiculous, but also realize that you can't tell the "real" ones from satire.	/r/MensRights	11/09/19 11:36 PM
10	Justifying ruining someone’s life for no reason because of stress https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe%27s_law	/r/MensRights	11/09/19 02:22 PM
20	Justifying ruining someone’s life for no reason because of stress This is probably a Poe.	/r/MensRights	11/09/19 01:09 PM
1	Casual sexual battery. She does this because she knows the system is tilted in her favor. Say no? She'll ignore you and do it anyway, knowing that your complaints won't likely be taken seriously by anyone. Attempt to physically stop her from sitting on you? She'll start screaming about assault, knowing that the programmed human default in this situation is that the screaming woman is the victim. Enjoy being swarmed by unthinking white knights. Even many "men" who see her do it will flip a switch in their heads the sec…	/r/MensRights	06/08/19 02:32 PM
9	My friend was falsely accused of rape and fully exonerated years ago YET some online trolls are trying to defame him so that he doesn’t get a part in a kids show The value of the information in this video is incredible. Any average person can watch this and understand why they should never talk to cops without their attorney present. I've lost track of how many times I've watched it.	/r/MensRights	24/07/19 01:10 AM
8	The Empathy Gap – Male Disadvantages and the Mechanisms of Their Neglect: A new book about men's issues. It's too long for the usual purveyors of outrage to actually read so I imagine this will be blindly labeled as alt-right sexist misogynistic wrongthink just like any other work of this nature.	/r/MensRights	13/07/19 03:48 PM
6	So apparently dad here is an asshole for wanting to tell his daughter why him and mom got divorced. Mom was the reason why they did. And he'd rather have his daughter mad at him then hurt her with the truth. The same thing occurred to me. She had at least four different affairs (probably more) and this dude believes that kid is his based on her word?	/r/MensRights	28/05/19 09:21 PM
5	Imagine if the man hit the woman... No apparent reason does not mean know reason at all. This is true. That's why I wrote "no apparent reason" instead of "no reason". If there is a reason, it is not demonstrated in this short clip, ergo it is not apparent.	/r/MensRights	23/05/19 04:28 PM
2	Imagine if the man hit the woman... You chose to word your question poorly so you caught downvotes. Even your edited post contains a presupposition and thus you are begging the question. Had you simply asked "Did this man do something to her prior or was this completely unprovoked?" would have garnered much less of a negative reaction.	/r/MensRights	23/05/19 03:52 PM
15	Imagine if the man hit the woman... Consider this: just because a woman hit a man does not mean that he deserved it. Such a presumption is pretty ugly if you think about it. Women are not "good" by default any more than men are "bad" by default.	/r/MensRights	23/05/19 03:11 PM
148	Imagine if the man hit the woman... Imagine if the man hit the woman. He would be beaten, possibly to death, by all the surrounding "men" who turn white knight and come running to the defense of (this part is sarcasm ->) this strong, empowered woman who is bravely fighting the patriarchy by assaulting someone for no apparent reason.	/r/MensRights	23/05/19 12:39 PM
0	Why has the diversity debate left white working-class boys behind? - UnHerd The so-called "diversity debate" isn't a debate. It's a facet of the ongoing cultural assault from the applied postmodernists of the far left which seeks to gain power for themselves and other adherents of their ideology. The resultant "progressive stack", which quite literally assigns value to a person according to an intersectional scoring system, puts white people at the very bottom of the column for scoring according to race. So why has the diversity debate left white working-class boys behi…	/r/MensRights	10/05/19 07:08 PM
8	Man Killed After False Sexual Assault Claim Sparks Fatal Revenge Attack. How is this not national news. Because this doesn't fit the current dominant narrative. It's really that simple. I hate that it sounds crass and cynical, but it answers your question completely. The current narrative is that men are oppressors, women should be believed, and false accusations are a fairy tale. This flies in the face of all three, therefore it is not talked about.	/r/MensRights	09/05/19 07:48 PM
2	Our teacher isn't allowing us to do our final project on sexism against men because he doesn't believe it exists. The reason your teacher believes what he does is because he's an adherent to the ideology of intersectionality. It is a quasi-religion in that it has all the elements of a religion except a belief in the supernatural. Part of their belief structure incorporates a rather bizarrely technical dialect consisting at least in part of words from common English that are re-defined to have a specific ideological basis in their definition. The various "isms" regarding certain forms of bigotry are perfect …	/r/MensRights	27/04/19 03:58 PM
5	An Olive Branch I don't like Vox Day and disagree with much of what he says and represents, but he accurately describes the standard SJW attack pattern: The eight stages of the SJW attack sequence are as follows: Locate or Create a Violation of the Narrative. Point and Shriek. Isolate and Swarm. Reject and Transform. Press for Surrender. Appeal to Amenable Authority. Show Trial. Victory Parade.	/r/MensRights	09/04/19 03:16 PM
6	Men finally admit to being bullied by their exes over child access, money and love I'm sure this will lead to a mass awakening across society, greater awareness of asymmetrical issues between men and women, empathy for men facing this struggle, and general improvement in cultural gender relations not a fucking thing changing.	/r/MensRights	29/03/19 05:23 PM
16	Tell the media to stop conflating incels with the MRM It is VERY intentional. By making those associations they can attribute all of the negatives of all of those things to the MR movement and that's exactly what you see from people when they respond to the stories.	/r/MensRights	26/04/18 02:25 PM
3	It’s the shit like this that give men a bad name. For one, the media calling incels a men’s rights movement when its a bunch of idiots hating on women. That’s not what men’s rights are about, but that’s what the media wants you to think. I just don’t know anymore. The conflation of the MR movement with other online men's presences such as Red Pill, the PUA community, incels and the like is very intentional. It benefits the pushing of the anti-male narrative if they can assign the negative traits of all of those groups of people with MRAs. By doing so it allows them to cast the MRA movement in a more negative light. They do this because they can't fight MRAs head-on.	/r/MensRights	25/04/18 02:47 PM
3	Feminist woman here, in the mood to passively listen. In your honest opinion, how much of this is going to be generalizations about women as a whole? Very little. Dr. Peterson is a very sharp guy who is exceptionally good at staying on point. He typically reserves topical switches to when one topic leads into another or is strongly related. If you watch his videos he never speaks in generalities. He always offers context and reason for his statements and couches them in his professional experience (Psychology) or his study of history. For example, …	/r/MensRights	17/10/17 05:29 PM
1	Feminist woman here, in the mood to passively listen. There's a good little snippet from an interview that Jordan Peterson did on Joe Rogan's show where he talks about what Gender Studies and modern feminism has led to and how it ties to and reflects Marxism and Socialism in structure. You may not agree with what Peterson says since you seem to be a fan of Marx and socialism, but it will give you an idea of what the more focused, intellectual critics see when they look at Feminism, Gender Studies, and the Marxism that comes along with it. More impo…	/r/MensRights	17/10/17 04:10 PM
3	Why are feminists unwilling to accept and reconcile established science? TL;DR for those that don't often delve into philosophy and history to a great degree: Modern feminism is strongly inspired by and structured according to postmodern ideas. Unfortunately, one of the key tenets to spring from postmodernism is that there's no such thing as truth. If there's no truth then everything is power games and narratives to control the levers of society. That's what feminists and the social justice movement wants: power. They view themselves of the losers of what has come so…	/r/MensRights	02/09/17 09:36 PM
2	Judge says Sofia Vergara's frozen embryos are 'citizens of California' This is what they actually did, though this article doesn't mention it. They had a contract drawn up with the terms being both parties had to agree to have the embryos gestated.	/r/MensRights	02/09/17 01:00 AM
180	'The Red Pill' Is The Men's Rights Documentary That Has Been Banned From Australia - Marie Claire \| Even more publicity, thanks feminists! “When you tear out a man's tongue, you are not proving him a liar, you're only telling the world that you fear what he might say.” -George R.R. Martin	/r/MensRights	20/04/17 05:58 PM
3	The Left's Grandstanding on Sexual Assault The root of left politics is collectivism and the root of right politics is individualism. It shouldn't be terribly surprising that identity politics, which is heavily collectivized, falls mostly on the left and appeals mostly to people on the left.	/r/MensRights	09/08/16 05:23 PM
5	Should little boys be taught to defend themselves against violent attacks? Everyone should learn self-defense. Boys should also be taught about their default status of aggressors and learn to escape situations where that is likely to be leveraged against them.	/r/MensRights	21/04/16 03:19 PM
4	Woman boasts about assault over disliked words; cheered on in comment section Violence in response to words is barbaric. The notion that hurt feelings gives you the right to physically harm someone is ridiculous and sad.	/r/MensRights	24/01/16 03:33 PM
22	After one week of a more truthful version of events, Wikipedia's Gamergate entry reverts back to its usual lies and misinformation. It is, at best, a Sisyphean endeavor to try to make truthful a wikipedia entry that is in the cross-hairs of a social religion that holds censorship and manipulation of information as a key and oft-practiced part of its existence.	/r/MensRights	01/02/15 04:26 AM
3	Never mention the red pill to fully blue pill men They probably don't realize that SJW and feminists are under the same umbrella: cultural marxism.	/r/TheRedPill	27/11/14 01:13 AM
8	Never mention the red pill to fully blue pill men To the PC crowd (SJWs, feminists, manginas, white knights and cultural marxists in general) they're all the same. They see the MRA, Red Pill, and PUA crowds as the same thing because they're all "out group" which oppose their cultural dogmas, albeit in different ways and for different reasons.	/r/TheRedPill	26/11/14 05:31 PM
8	Remember that guy who got fired from Business Insider for "sexist" tweets? He's finally talking about the ridiculous witchhunt led against him. Think of the Miranda warning you get if you're arrested in the United States and take it to heart when it comes to speaking or writing either in person, on the internet, in a book or magazine, or whatever. WHAT YOU SAY CAN AND WILL BE USED AGAINST YOU.	/r/TheRedPill	23/10/14 02:07 PM
3	Extremist Ezra Klein says that for "affirmative consent" to succeed, colleges need to be filled with cases where young men are punished for ambiguous sex encounters We appreciate his honesty. It saves lots of time on our end when fighting this stuff.	/r/MensRights	15/10/14 06:15 PM
1	I got banned from r/offmychest for posting an anecdote about feminists that I've come into personal contact with. You posted an anti-feminism comment when the rules have a very strong implication that boils down to "criticizing feminism is against the rules". No surprise, really.	/r/MensRights	17/09/14 08:13 PM
6	I just found out I have a 4 and a half year old son . WTF What an unreasonable, closed-minded stance to take. Holy crap, you are profoundly selfish and insecure. I pity whoever married you.	/r/MensRights	17/09/14 07:59 PM
3	Ten years ago, Kate Bolick ended a happy relationship with an eligible man. She thought her future was limitless and that she would have her pick of husbands. But now, almost 40, she believes she may be alone forever... I started laughing my ass off when I got past the man-blaming section and into the vagina-gazing section of that article. By the time I got to the end I had to double-check to see if I was on Jezebel. Holy shit.	/r/TheRedPill	20/08/14 03:20 PM
16	Confessions of an intimate terrorist: It's the buzzword for bullying husbands - but now researchers say WOMEN are the worst offenders. Here, one scary wife admits all I'm not sure how someone can be so cognizant of being such a horrible person that they can write about it in such honest, accurate detail and yet still persist at it. I don't understand why she isn't getting some help for her serious problem or why her husband persists in maintaining the marriage instead of retreating to safety.	/r/MensRights	27/06/14 07:30 PM
3	Men Are Obsolete I must be in the minority of people who saw Hanna Rosin and promptly clicked the back button. Why would I even bother to read any of her bigoted trash?	/r/MensRights	03/06/14 08:03 AM