| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 | Why I believe in Men's Rights | Emorich | /r/MensRights | 24/07/11 05:44 PM |
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | This one is really sick.......I wonder if the decision may have had something to do with the children? It's possible (though really, not probable) that had the genders been reversed the husband would have won the case because he had childcare expenses. | /r/MensRights | 30/07/11 03:35 AM |
| 0 | Why I believe in Men's RightsYou're right, most men probably aren't bastards there. That doesn't change the fact that women living there would most likely be justified in feeling like they were. | /r/MensRights | 24/07/11 09:48 PM |
| 7 | Why I believe in Men's RightsI really appreciate the feminine viewpoint on the issue. The thing I would really like to point out in your comment is this line: As a woman, to me, man-hate is embarrassing This is hugely important for a number of reasons. From a societal standpoint, we will know we have conquered discrimination when people scoff at the very idea, not when we have laws protecting every possible minority group. It is an embarrassment to me as a man that there are other men out there who hate women. When that ide… | /r/MensRights | 24/07/11 08:16 PM |
| 0 | Why I believe in Men's RightsBut how much anger is too much anger, and how much is just to add an exclamation point to otherwise complete political impotence I don't have the answer, but I like your thought process. I don't know how much anger is too much, but I do know we should all have that question in our minds when reading and writing on this subreddit. Where the line should be drawn is up to you, but extremist language (whatever that word means to you) should not be upvoted. You're probably right about not taking the … | /r/MensRights | 24/07/11 08:03 PM |
| -3 | Why I believe in Men's Rightsde-facto discrimination against men Nonsense. If two people are equally qualified for a position, they should be equally likely to get it. Their genders should make no difference. The EEOC is by no means perfect, and they have no way of policing thoughts, but there are genuinely misogynistic employers out there, and they have a negative effect on our society. If you accept that women and men are generally pretty similar in ability at most tasks, it is unreasonable to hire only one or the other, … | /r/MensRights | 24/07/11 07:03 PM |
| 2 | Why I believe in Men's RightsI fully admit that I'm on a high horse here, but I like to think that it's a good cause. I think we can be better than we are. I think we're wasting a lot of potential. I'm not sure if you aren't buying into the mra as misogynists feminist line a bit. For the most part this is my own experience talking. I don't think it's that hard to argue that there is a lot of anger in this subreddit. Anger and misogyny are not the same thing, but it's easy for one to become the other, especially if you start… | /r/MensRights | 24/07/11 06:50 PM |
| 0 | Why I believe in Men's RightsWell, I think the "was necessary" part should speak for itself. The circumstances I was referring to in the present tense would be things like the equal opportunities employment act. It's important to both sexes that sexual discrimination isn't tolerated, and it is generally feminism that does that. Government grants to only one sex are in fact discriminatory. They are an example of feminism moving to far. Still, that is not a counter-argument to what I said. I am calling for civility. I would l… | /r/MensRights | 24/07/11 06:31 PM |
| 7 | Why I believe in Men's RightsThank you. More than anything else that's the sentiment I'm going for. | /r/MensRights | 24/07/11 06:16 PM |
| 11 | White Knight cartoon, found on 4chan: Could be useful in forum debates?We shouldn't respond to sexism with more sexism. That phrase is a reference to the idea that men are only interested in sex. IE, All I want is milk (sex) and she is giving it away so I don't want her. The reverse of that is the idea that women only want money and protection from men. Neither of these ideas are true or productive, and both are detrimental to everyone's equality when we hold them as true. | /r/MensRights | 20/06/11 01:22 AM |
| 2 | r/Egalitarianism isn't popular because it isn't controversial and it isn't controversial because its actually good. I would recommend to give it a try.Yes, but a place where everyone agrees with you is more pleasant. It's why people listen to Fox news. Some of them know they are only getting one side, but it's the side they agree with, so they don't care. I wholeheartedly agree with the goal of this subreddit, but I'm the first to point out that we have our fair share of sensationalism and childish resentment. Over there, you are speaking directly to members of the "opposition" so that kind of stuff doesn't go over so well. | /r/MensRights | 12/04/11 05:39 PM |
| 8 | I'm genuinely curious, I want to hear your solutions."Women's rights" is not nearly done: it is barely beginning. They will not stop before they have every conceivable, imaginable 'right' I'm sure there are women who want this, but I refuse to believe a majority do. When a woman kills her sleeping husband, I have quite a lot of trouble with the idea that the majority of women celebrate. They're less sad if it turns out that guy was beating her, sure, and we can debate the morality of that, but I really think it's nonsense to think that most women … | /r/MensRights | 02/04/11 10:58 PM |
| 7 | I'm genuinely curious, I want to hear your solutions.Yes and no. I don't want to put words in his mouth, but I believe when he said "women" he meant "pop culture." I think he's trying to say that all the sitcoms where the wife is sensible and the man is a bumbling moron begin to mold culture after a while. Same for the movies where the man is a womanizing ass who wants to have sex with everyone and never settle down and be responsible. By repeatedly showing stereotype they begin to validate it in the minds of their viewers. In other words, when pe… | /r/MensRights | 02/04/11 10:05 PM |
| 21 | I'm genuinely curious, I want to hear your solutions.My hope for men's rights is the same as my hope for women's rights: I want us to become quaint anachronisms. Think of it this way. There is no law forcing employers to hire equal numbers of blondes and brunettes. Statistically it's likely that there are a small number of work places where there are exclusively one or the other. Does this make the employer hair-ist? No, it's just a weird coincidence. You could argue that we need laws to prevent this from happening, but you would probably be laugh… | /r/MensRights | 02/04/11 08:26 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter