TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Emotional_Section_59 Archive

View 3 posts and 153 comments by Emotional_Section_59 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
13

She thinks consistently spreading her legs is working hard
/r/BlackPillScience26/05/26 12:17 AM
12

It's not even because women raise boys, but rather because men desire women more than women desire men.
/r/MensRights27/02/26 02:22 PM
8

You can't be serious lol. If you're 4'10 you're either not done growing or you are. There's no face in the world for your height.
/r/BlackPillScience26/02/26 12:06 AM
17

Yeah, he must have been Congolese then.
/r/MensRights25/01/26 05:17 AM
37

The more interesting part is how women's "preferences" have shaped selection in men. Although, to be fair, the same is true for breast size in human women.
/r/BlackPillScience23/01/26 03:35 AM
5

Obviously, most white men don't prefer Asian women. But geomaxxing is a massive trend nowadays.
/r/BlackPillScience22/01/26 04:28 PM
8

You have no clue what you're talking about mayn.
/r/BlackPillScience22/01/26 04:20 PM
1

Nietzsche was a genuine incel iirc
/r/BlackPillScience30/12/25 04:26 AM
1

You are either trolling or have a low iq yourself. Ironic lol
/r/BlackPillScience27/12/25 07:08 AM
1

It's statistical analysis on publicly available data. You can literally reproduce it yourself if you don't believe it
/r/BlackPillScience21/12/25 04:21 PM
1

You sound like a deep, wholesome individual.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 03:03 AM
0

most of the guys in MGTOW are mostly incels Most guys are incels. Full stop. Some are just self aware about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 11:37 PM
1

Nah, they're just slightly higher iq on average. Ugly people are often pushed into nerddom due to social rejection. People take to reading books or develop niche obsessions as a means of cope. The ugly nerd stereotype exists for a reason, as evidenced by the statistical data from this study.
/r/BlackPillScience21/11/25 06:43 AM
1

What a profound counter! You talk as though the vast majority of any group is Nietzsche or Newton.
/r/BlackPillScience21/11/25 01:01 AM
1

Lol you're so slow. What were Nietzsche and Newton, just from immediate recall. Speak for yourself, you dumb pos.
/r/BlackPillScience19/11/25 09:26 AM
–

Because its what they want deep down. Women generally want to be infantilized and afforded "princess treatment" as long as they aren't openly criticized for it.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/11/25 07:38 AM
0

Exception that proves the rule. Also wtf is your account 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/25 09:26 AM
0

No, they are looking for tall and handsome. Then they will pray he has a "good personality".
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/25 09:01 AM
0

Women are bitter about "no good men left" Unless good man = 6'5 blue eyes in finance (did I mention trust fund) there are a bazillion "good men" on most women's doorsteps just hoping she even gives him a second look. It's the era of no one getting what they want. Lol. Women are getting exactly what they want, and then some. Women are increasingly turning away from normal dating towards sugar dating (normal dating where the man pays them for existing) and other forms of monetizing their s/rmv. Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 07:54 AM
1

There's literally a whole app with millions of downloads designed around such a customer base.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 06:07 PM
2

Have you ever heard of a gold digger? Or the women "who have grown into wanting love and stability"? Yeah, these are the exact same women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 07:58 AM
20

Schrodinger's feminist. They are simultaneously disempowered and empowered until they decide which state benefits them most at any given moment.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/10/25 04:52 PM
2

That is a brilliant article.
/r/MensRights17/10/25 12:10 AM
12

As a (non-protected, these people most often choose this lifestyle REDDIT MODS) group, sex worker women are disproportionately more likely to be drug addicts and suffer from mental health afflictions. They also have dark triad traits at much higher rates than the population baseline - who could have guessed that OnlyFans models are more likely to be narcissistic? Hopefully, she's actually charged with murder and spends the rest of her life in a cell. Thanks to feminism I wouldn't bet on it, thou…
/r/MensRights16/10/25 02:03 PM
9

Great comment. I'd also like to add that female in-group bias has been shown to be significantly greater than it's male counterpart - by an insane factor of 4.5X in this study. You would think that there's a relationship between how biased you are against outgroups and your general capacity for empathy.
/r/MensRights15/10/25 03:40 PM
14

Male hyperagency is just men working harder. Since men aren't as inherently valued, we are incentivized to work harder in order to build our worth.
/r/MensRights11/10/25 05:31 PM
5

Lmao you're going even further off the rails here. The whole insult was that Stephen Miller apparently has "4'10 energy" or something along those lines. When he is in fact 5'10, which isn't even short in the US by almost any metric. This isn't a defensible position. Your replies are only proving to everyone else just how delusional you and your fellow AOC fangirls are. So please, why don't you elaborate a little further for the guys at the back?
/r/MensRights09/10/25 08:06 PM
2

Unironically yes. They weren't central to his point at all, the insult wasn't them being white lmao. You think it would any less insulting if they were elderly black hippies lmao, Stephen Miller is white himself anyway. You're comparing apples to oranges here.
/r/MensRights09/10/25 07:57 PM
5

How is being a communist or a hippy uncontrollable or immutable lmfao. This cope is pathetic.
/r/MensRights09/10/25 07:50 PM
12

Yeah, it's not like you aren't getting your money's worth or anything.
/r/MensRights30/09/25 12:43 PM
0

In what way(s)?
/r/MensRights26/09/25 04:00 AM
1

Facts are facts
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 08:39 PM
13

😂😂😂😂😂😂 Isn't the main reason why the y chromosome is so ridiculously bottlenecked the fact that only 1 man per 17 women reproduced during the post-Neolithic transition into agro-pastoral organized society? So her solution is to further reduce the number of men reproducing?? Because clearly what we need is even less diversity in the already extremely inbred y chromosome. Damn man. Everyone is naturally drawn towards reproducing with "healthier" mates, but these "people" moralizing actively denyin…
/r/EverydayMisandry24/09/25 11:38 PM
4

Lol your life isn't sad, but you are simply an exception. Good job finding a unicorn Oh also, you seem to have very normal interests. What about those of us who have hypermasculine/niche interests? Women are already underrepresented even in normie hobbies so history nerds etc are cooked lmao
/r/BlackPillScience18/09/25 07:02 PM
6

You are looking at this from a very rational mindset. And that's why you're wrong
/r/BlackPillScience18/09/25 12:43 PM
10

Most men absolutely marry women to either get laid, or have someone to carry and rear their children. The reason many men like hanging out with their wife is that there is a romantic/sexual subtext to all their interactions. Remove that subtext, and you will find most men utterly uninterested in their wives, unless their wives are exceptional. Think about it. Men are not privileged. We have no choice but to build our power and status, or die trying. We can't just float through life on our looks …
/r/BlackPillScience18/09/25 04:36 AM
5

Personality, eh? To put it as politely as possible, I think if most men were primarily looking for personality in their partners, then most men would be married to other men. What do you expect her to offer while you both work? Nothing. I'm too ugly to offer anything except my wallet in the first place lol
/r/BlackPillScience17/09/25 09:17 PM
29

They don't need a man to pay their bills. They want a man to pay their bills, and fly them around and pamper them. Why would I even want my looksmatch unless she has something to offer? I'm not sure what feminist women think they are bringing to the table nowadays lol
/r/BlackPillScience17/09/25 08:21 PM
164

It's insane how little outrage there is over this. She should absolutely be held accountable for the consequences of her actions.
/r/MensRights16/09/25 12:48 PM
181

That "friend" group is a bunch of cucks anyway. Dude is better off without them.
/r/MensRights16/09/25 11:23 AM
66

Rape is very bad, but murder is objectively worse. And vigilantism generally doesn't help civilized society, especially when you've got randoms acting as judge, jury, and executioner. So, no, maybe don't free her.
/r/MensRights15/09/25 07:28 PM
1

It's not impossible for a man below average height to be considered somewhat attractive but it certainly is notably uncommon. And even if he's considered attractive, his height will always be held against him as some sort of fatal flaw. I'm talking guys between 5'7 and 5'10. At that height range, a man has to compensate for his lack of height with an extra attractive face, making it much rarer for women to consider men of that height range attractive. Tbh it's very rare for a woman under 140lbs …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 09:15 PM
1

50% of men are below average height by definition lol. 75% or more are under 6ft in most areas. But yeah it's a lot easier to dismiss what I'm saying if you focus on the specifics (which are vaguely correct anyway) and intentionally miss the forest for the trees :)
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 07:44 PM
1

No lol, for men you have to factor in height as well. So automatically, 50% of men are considered unattractive by women purely on the basis of that and probably 75% are capped at a certain level. Whereas only dwarfettes and amazonian women (altogether under 1% of female population) would be viewed as less attractive by men. Both genders place a roughly equal weight on physical attractiveness, sure. But men are also expected to be charismatic, financially "secure", competent etc etc etc. Which ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 06:58 PM
1

This is such a cope. 99% of women can easily be extremely attractive given good self care and relatively low levels of plastic surgery should they wish. The same is absolutely not true for men. Average woman is perceived as more attractive than the average man to begin with regardless lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 03:17 PM
16

But you clearly didn't care if other men would see your videos and be affected in a similar way. I promise that if this story is real, you will have contributed, at least in part, to some men taking their lives either already or in the future. But don't sweat it. As you already said, the majority of women nowadays are just like you "used to be". You were just another brave soldier doing her part.
/r/MensRights12/09/25 05:43 PM
15

I almost bullied my own brother into committing sewerslide. Why am I getting any pushback??? "Former" misandrist, 2025
/r/MensRights12/09/25 04:24 PM
1

Yes, but I love how you think this is a good thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/25 01:35 PM
–

You're literally complaining about not getting free entry lol
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/25 12:45 PM
–

You can pay like the men do.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/25 09:36 AM
1

Wishful thinking, to say the least. Most high school students graduate extremely ignorant as to the world around them.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 11:10 PM
1

Damn I'm conflating 2 completely different threads. Either way, Marx is a politically/ideologically charged author who probably isn't a fair standalone recommendation for such a young man. Class consciousness n all is great but only as part of more holistic reading imo.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 11:03 PM
1

Marx has some great insights, but I don't think he was an appropriate recommendation here. "Just go to parties and read some Marx brooo!" is an absurd statement for self explanatory reasons lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 10:47 PM
4

Yeah, they are literally partying it up in nightclubs all over Europe while their men are getting shot and blown up on the front lines in Ukraine. This is normal. When Nazi Germany occupied France for only a few years, about 75,000 to 200,000 children were born to Nazi male French female parents during that time 😂😂😂 Love knows no boundaries, right? It doesn't matter if he's a nazi who thinks you're racially inferior and killed hundreds of your countrymen, at least he's tall and good-looking and …
/r/EverydayMisandry19/08/25 02:08 AM
-2

It's not misandry when being homosexual is empowering in 2025.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/08/25 11:57 PM
1

How tf did you get married 😂😂😂 You unironically must be like 6'3 with a model level face and high income to be pulling a woman like that hahaha
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 10:17 PM
5

Idk dude, grindr seems (and even sounds, it's in the name jfc) like the ultimate meat market even compared to other "dating" apps. When I think of strong men, I think of men with principles, stoics who do their best to confront the deeper challenges of life. What doesn't immediately come to mind is men who hedonistically chase hookups on grindr (or any dating app for that matter).
/r/MensRights10/08/25 04:00 AM
1

That's a very basic observation. You simply don't have any rebuttal since you know it's true. Your best bet is sticking to the fact men have higher rates of infidelity.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 06:24 PM
1

I'm not justifying it for either gender. But just remember that men don't get pregnant. When a woman cheats, it is a more impactful choice since women naturally have a much bigger investment in reproduction. It's the same reason women seek out casual encounters less than men in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 02:08 PM
0

A man can love a woman and still cheat on her. If a woman cheats on a man, it almost always implies that there was long term emotional cheating beforehand. It's rarely ever just a mistake.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 01:20 PM
0

Men cheat because of biological desires. Women cheat because they don't and never cared about their partner. One is a mistake, whereas the other is cold and calculated.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 03:05 AM
1

I don’t think either gender is more guilty of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 05:32 PM
2

Women can click their fingers and find a thousand men willing to date them. By her sheer multitude of options, surely a few would be appealing to her. 99% of men can do no such thing. Your "sometimes" means very different things to men and women
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 01:59 AM
1

You are very intellectually dishonest. It's not hard to look at the research, yet you come and write a hundred lines supporting hypotheses that are evidently false. It's been proven that women are more hypergamous than men. It's a fact that would require pretty extraordinary evidence to question at this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 01:53 AM
0

This is a complete projection of women's tendency to be unloyal and monkey branch. Men don't require copious amounts of maternal hormones to become attached to another human being, hence why men grieve breakups for so much longer than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 01:48 AM
15

Like predicting 8 at 7:30 🤣🤣🤣🤣
/r/MensRights31/07/25 02:29 AM
19

Yeah, this is what they really think. Not all of them, but far too many. Their empathy is reserved only for their children and other women. It's been empirically demonstrated that women, on average, display an in-group bias 4.5 times as large as that of men. This is just one manifestation of that result.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/07/25 02:47 PM
1

Not when these people are going through a lot of difficulty as a direct consequence of their choices time and time again. An alcoholic doesn't gain valuable life experience every time they hit the bottle again. Some people grow under pressure, and others break.
/r/RedPillWomen19/07/25 10:14 PM
6

There was an academic paper showing misogynistic men are significantly more successful with women than the average guy. I'll link it now
/r/MensRights14/07/25 08:03 PM
1

You clearly don't understand the benefits of having complete control over the global reserve currency.
/r/MensRights13/07/25 12:48 AM
2

I read one of your sources, and it didn't seem to support your claims in the slightest. Why would I dedicate my time to reading more if your first source seems to be almost completely divorced from the subject of Internet gender war history? This is an utterly obnoxious approach you've chosen to take. "If you can't understand why my sources justify my statement, then don't ask me to provide them" is essentially your entire point here. You've spent more effort berating me for not engaging properl…
/r/EverydayMisandry09/07/25 06:10 PM
5

If I were you, I'd stop embarrassing myself here as well. It's clear you don't have a solid foundation to argue on, or you could just ask chatGPT to summarize your articles in a way that underpins your message. I don't have the time to wade through 3 separate articles that are at best vaguely connected to the actual discussion that was meant to happen here.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/07/25 05:58 PM
4

I think you're just far too intelligent for us over here on this sub. Seems like you're the only one capable of following your own logic.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/07/25 04:17 PM
4

I can't believe you took the time to type all of that out. I'll be able to constructively engage with you when you instead take the time to explain how the falling number of women working in the computing industry directly correlates to men being the aggressors in Internet gender wars. You're fighting shadows here. I haven't debated the issue your sources address with you in the slightest. persons having access to computers and the ability to have hands on knowledge translates to familiarity and…
/r/EverydayMisandry09/07/25 04:15 PM
11

All these sources relate to the diminishing number of women in the computing industry? I'm failing to see a direct relationship between this and the topic of Internet gender wars, and especially how these sources support your claim of men primarily being the aggressors.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/07/25 02:06 AM
10

Seems to be an article about (potential discrimination against) women in the field of computer science and not necessarily related to the topic at hand.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/07/25 01:48 AM
8

I'm asking for sources since I don't happen to be an expert on Internet gender war history.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/07/25 12:33 AM
11

it is between a subset of men online who are specifically targeting women online and a subset of women online retaliating. Sources or r/BlatantMisogyny. That's a bold claim to make so subtly.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/07/25 12:23 AM
21

Only way to win some games is to not play at all. The majority of men are better off dedicating their time to doing literally almost anything else except interacting with women. Unfortunately, men will never change.
/r/BlackPillScience03/07/25 11:00 PM
82

Just win the lottery, bro. Lottery winners exist.
/r/BlackPillScience03/07/25 02:35 PM
6

Being 5'9 as a woman is actually more aesthetically appealing. Just look at the average height of female models. You absolutely can't relate to the struggle of short men who themselves are 5'9, much less even shorter men.
/r/MensRights27/06/25 09:09 PM
1

I appreciate your empathy.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/25 02:14 AM
1

Lol, there's nothing to work through, or on. Many men are frankly undesired for anything except perhaps our wealth, which isn't even intrinsic to us. No amount of charisma or (vague, abstract, nebulous) "personality" will ever effectively change that. There is no logic or fairness, no morality to it at all. We just sort of float through our lives without any romantic interest or connection, ever. Completely invisible. We're essentially forced into being stoics in a blatantly hedonistic world, or…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/25 04:36 AM
1

Less free resources. If men stopped chasing women they'd lose a significant amount of "privilege".
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 05:59 PM
2

Many men directly financially contribute to individual women's lives in the hopes of winning them over or interacting with them in certain ways. The entire SW industry, paying for first dates and taking on the majority of the financial burden in relationships... many women directly benefit a lot from men's resources.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 04:19 PM
-2

Why I won't should be enlightenment enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 06:04 AM
-2

Ever heard of opportunity cost?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 05:04 AM
0

Someone else was reading books from the library while you were at the nightclub. Someone else was contributing to society while you were having another drunk tryst for the 100th time. It's really as simple as that. Any consistent displays of hedonism disgust some people because of what they imply about your overall character. There isn't any balancing it out.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 04:58 AM
5

Geez, dude. The women here have been screaming it from the rooftops for long enough. Most women are not attracted to most men. Even if men stopped chasing women, little would change because women would keep chasing the small subsection of men they are already attracted to and continue to ignore the rest. I agree men should stop chasing women only so that women stop benefitting off male labor. It would be interesting to see what would happen if such a shift were to occur. Massive shame that it ne…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 04:45 AM
2

It can't bring out what wasn't already there. But, yeah, gg China.
/r/MensRights10/06/25 10:18 PM
10

That "like unless it's me idgaf" comment sums up 99% of modern Western women's views on just about everything. Whatever in the world happened to the nurturing, caring kind of femininity and when did it get replaced by this vain, hedonistic corruption?
/r/MensRights08/06/25 12:30 AM
1

This is a complete cope. You're just trying to make yourself look good by association because that helps fulfil your need to be vain and high status.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 08:08 AM
1

You don't want to start comparing male vs. female contribution to society. It isn't an effective strategy for someone taking your position.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 06:52 PM
1

I'd agree. Not really much to debate there.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 06:49 PM
1

Perhaps once upon a time. Social media has drawn out your true colors.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 06:46 PM
1

I only want to engage with the comments about Jane Austen- so I have. Any other obscure facts you'd like to enlighten us with? Your avoidance of the central topic is telling.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 06:27 PM
1

What women truly care about: attention, vanity, status.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 05:38 PM
1

You're clearly here to nitpick and split hairs instead of engaging with the message of the post. It would be appropriate to constructively criticize its presentation as an aside, but you haven't directly addressed what's really being discussed here even once. Sociocultural / economic circumstances forcing noblewomen in Regency and Victorian era Britain to extract their fellow noblemen's wealth is all jolly and well, but it's not exactly such a strong defence for the contemporary woman now, is it…
/r/MensRights16/05/25 05:18 PM
6

Yeah, it's the double standard that is the problem. Men are just expected to be exceptional and not even be acknowledged for it.
/r/MensRights05/05/25 01:40 PM
19

Nothing. What matters is that even someone as stupid as him was voted in over the radical left. That says a lot.
/r/MensRights05/05/25 01:14 PM
7

?? Men should be strong and make money, though? That doesn't necessarily equate to providing for a woman who won't even appreciate it. It means achieving self-actualization by contributing to society.
/r/MensRights05/05/25 01:12 PM
11

Now it's got us kneeling for radfems too!
/r/MensRights05/05/25 01:10 PM
-3

Your brain literally doesn't work. "What's 1 + 1?" "Nah, bodily autonomy good" You're just repeating a mantra without critically thinking, at all. Yeah ofc bodily autonomy is good. That's not the point. The point is unchecked hypergamy benefits nobody in the long run. It's how we all become more atomized and isolated, how we all lose the social power to stand up against the top 1% and so much more. Relationships becoming commodified with OLD + social media was a wakeup call that we failed to ans…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 02:18 AM
2

Point of the post completely flew over your head. It's the gaslighting and virtue signalling that are the problems, not the preferences themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 04:16 PM
3

THANK YOU. Really. More men need to understand this. We are destroying ourselves over nothing, and it hurts to watch.
/r/MensRights20/04/25 03:31 PM
2

I'm genuinely lost for words.
/r/MensRights20/04/25 02:31 PM
2

It's an entire industry where the supply side is dominated by extreme liberalism and feminism. And guys like OP are funding it, but somehow I'm the misandrist lmao. Low iqs. You're all pathetic, myopic losers.
/r/MensRights20/04/25 02:20 PM
10

Relax with the loaded assumptions there. Geez, man. Paying for sexual services, in any capacity, is degrading. Whether that's OF, Tinder or straight up hookers. You're paying extortionate prices for a service other men get for free. That you should be getting for free, had society been normal. Yet here you are, paying the same women who wouldn't even bat an eyelid at you had you not had the money. Throwing your resources at them in some desperate attempt for intimacy, only to receive a meaningle…
/r/MensRights19/04/25 11:48 PM
21

Sex work does not benefit men. It is literally a wealth transfer from men to women.
/r/MensRights19/04/25 11:26 PM
6

It's narcissism. Nothing more, nothing less.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/04/25 02:18 PM
-1

Women are just as good at putting their feelings aside in casual encounters.
/r/RedPillWomen10/04/25 05:24 PM
1

r/witchesvspatriarchy
/r/EverydayMisandry09/04/25 03:51 AM
1

It's easy, yeah. Don't conflate easy with fulfilling or meaningful. I don't actually think your life is better in that sense. But you and I both know that when push comes to shove, you have that little lifeline to fall back on. That you're valued for what you are, not only what you have/work for. And in that sense, you live life on easy mode. You'd be thousands of dollars poorer as a man on the sole basis of your sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 11:43 PM
1

Don't infantilize these guys. Believe me, I don't. Doesn't change the fact that they paid you large sums of money for literally existing. You don't get that privilege as a man. I'm not sure how you don't think that's "easy mode".
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 10:29 PM
1

Oh, so you never exploited that kind of man to make your own life easier? You've always had "a straight job", always had to earn your living with productive or skilled work like non-rich men actually do. Sorry, I must have gotten you confused with another u/thotisms_speaks.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 09:38 PM
1

I said you specifically. There were clearly enough filthy rich simps for you. And that's fine, but then you come here and complain about women having it rough as if you didn't personally benefit from men paying you for the hard earned fact of your existence. I wasn't logically addressing your argument, and that was never my intention. I was addressing your blatant hypocrisy.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 08:05 PM
3

It's not necessarily about mental health, though. Many men commit suicide because they have deemed that their lives, in their subjective opinion, are not worth living any longer. They don't have to be 'depressed' or clinically insane or whatever else it might be to make that call. They could have just spent some time reflecting and realized that they don't like their life enough to keep living. Why 4X as many men make that call, I'll leave up to you.
/r/MensRights30/03/25 05:30 PM
1

You specifically irritate me the most. Your life is the definition of easy mode, literally having made thousands from monetizing what you are. You never really had to work, or provide any sort of real tangible skills/value, yet here you are genuinely arguing that women don't have it easy. You have it so incredibly easy that of course you can't see it. Men actually have to earn everything we have through grit and hard work. You were spoon-fed money by men, so of course you couldn't possibly under…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 03:51 PM
0

Not really. Feel free to keep distracting yourself while your competition locks in on work and self-improvement.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 01:21 PM
5

Everyone knows women engage with a certain subset of men. Reddit just loves playing dumb
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 01:16 PM
1

Congratulations on completely misinterpreting the comment above! Honestly impressive how creatively you managed to twist the meaning.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 01:00 PM
1

They're probably very rare, though. But if that's what floats your boat then it's all good. My only issue is people who support leeches as if it benefits society in any way.
/r/MensRights15/02/25 05:21 AM
1

Why are you even going for trans specifically lol? Idrc who you're paying tho as long as you're paying. Why should we judge? Because they're supporting entitled, privileged people who never had to work a day in their lives and leech off the increasing atomization of society. They literally make their money off the commodification of intimacy and male desperation.
/r/MensRights15/02/25 04:52 AM
1

With all due respect, please take your feet pics and promote them somewhere else. What has this sub come to? And society moreover... Imagine growing up as a young boy, and your mother is selling feet pics on Reddit. Absolutely brutal tbh.
/r/MensRights13/02/25 03:52 AM
7

With all due respect, please take your feet pics and promote them somewhere else. What has this sub come to? And society moreover... Imagine growing up as a young boy, and your mother is selling feet pics on Reddit. Absolutely brutal tbh.
/r/MensRights13/02/25 03:52 AM
2

The whole post is specifically about a man giving up on romance. And your suggested solution is for him to rather consume SW instead. That isn't even a substitute. If the post was rather about sex, then perhaps there would have been a discussion to be had. If you have an agenda to spread, just be confident about it. This empath "there are no easy solutions only tradeoffs" bs isn't convincing in the slightest.
/r/MensRights12/02/25 10:46 AM
1

You're advocating for men to support an absolutely evil and degenerate industry. "Just pay for it" is horrible advice, and doesn't even help the men being advised. Nothing you've mentioned justifies consuming SW in the slightest.
/r/MensRights11/02/25 08:55 PM
2

What's wrong with you, man? You really think SW is the solution to any of this???? That whole industry is a massive wealth transfer that enriches the absolute lowest dregs of society. Any form of it is absolutely detestable, for so many reasons.
/r/MensRights11/02/25 05:45 PM
78

And sexual assault too, lol. Same logic.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/01/25 06:09 PM
8

This guy is exactly like modern women. "I just fell out of love"... were there any reasons for this?? The way he describes it is as if he just woke up one day and stopped caring about her. If that's the case, it's absolutely ridiculous, and we'd be hypocrites for supporting it.
/r/MensRights22/01/25 03:27 AM
5

I'm sorry you had to experience that. You didn't deserve to be treated in such a way at all. You trusted him with your intimacy, and he turned it against you. Intentionally, to hurt you. His admittance is absolutely damning. Someone like that can not be trusted. If he's willing to hurt you so deeply, he clearly doesn't value the relationship or you as a person.
/r/RedPillWomen27/12/24 06:26 AM
4

A good first step would be to stop commercializing your sexuality. Doing so is an implicit statement that any intimacy you share with a man could have a price tag on it - and high value men will generally pick up on this (at least subconsciously). You already have a strong base to work with - conventionally attractive, youthful, and so on. You'll probably also have a much better time in the long run with men you come across physically (especially in bigger cities) rather than online dating or so…
/r/RedPillWomen25/12/24 02:11 AM
8

A lot of men want a girl who’s both hotter and more charming than they are too. Well, clearly, not enough men are hypergamous enough to have tiktok trends flaunting their (racially and elitistly charged) preferences go viral and be incredibly popular with other men. Never happened, and hopefully never will It's genuinely disgusting. Having personal preferences is one thing, but that whole trend goes far beyond any definition of 'personal'.
/r/MensRights15/12/24 05:24 PM
2

If you’re not in the small subset of men who are over 6 feet and have money, Don't forget being facially attractive too.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/24 04:02 PM
-2

Well, the entirety of contemporary feminism relies upon women's insanely high in-group bias anyway. The general "idea" that patriarchy is an intentional form of oppression by men rather than a naturally occurring emergent phenomenon in historically successful societies being a key example of this bias. So we can observe that the central tenet of feminism is in of itself biased against men, and uses the most harsh possible interpretation of data to criticise and villainize men while absolving wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/24 03:53 PM
-5

Lol. Women always deserve the most generous interpretation of data. You wouldn't extend the same privilege to men, though - I.e the fact that feminists will believe that a large portion of women being assaulted implies that an equal portion of men do the assaulting. When there actually isn't any evidence to support that.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/24 03:29 PM
-1

What are you laughing at? There's plenty of meaning in lip fillers, and of course, that latest handbag all your friends need almost as much as you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/24 05:30 PM
1

That I am bothered when a complete stranger at a bar tells me he is going to take me home and eat me out totally unprompted. Would you ever say that to a man whose body was mangled at a dangerous job? A man who is suicidal and has nowhere to turn? A man forced to go to war? Do these men need to "take accountability" for how trauma affected them? How are you comparing inappropriate comments to someone's life being genuinely threatened? Completely different ballparks here. It just reminds me why I…
/r/MensRights27/11/24 11:04 PM
2

But it will be.
/r/MensRights24/11/24 12:27 AM
1

It's naturally very difficult for women to understand that male in-group bias is far lower than their own. They usually just cannot comprehend it and generally operate on the assumption that it is roughly equivalent to It's female counterpart. This is one of the (several) fatal flaws of feminist theory.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 12:04 PM
22

The Democrats you support with all your heart clearly don't have much sympathy for men. Lets play a little game of spot the missing group. Oh, that's right. It's men. The only major American demographic conveniently left out is men. The Democrats stand for literally everyone except men.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 08:20 AM
9

Lol you mean low testosterone handwriting
/r/MensRights13/11/24 08:56 PM
10

Not an excuse. You live and you learn, try not to make the same mistake next time. Self control is always an option, and always the right one.
/r/MensRights13/11/24 08:54 PM
31

God, you know, I've been saying for over a decade now: imagine a feminism that didn't hate men. Imagine a brand of feminism that actually accepted men and listened to men's issues. Imagine if their rhetoric wasn't downright repulsive, and imagine if the man-hating feminists actually got ejected from the group instead of celebrated. That's called egalitarianism. Feminism (in the Western world at least) has been mostly obsolete since the gender pay gap between men and women working the same role w…
/r/MensRights11/11/24 08:37 AM
6

I know 2 people who have been falsely accused, and I'm a very young man (they were both minors at the time). Both were temporarily incarcerated before being released due to the accuser admitting that she lied + lack of evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 04:17 PM
2

Men try so hard and women just have to exist. He's never mentioned that, yet I'm sure we can both agree that this is a very common position men hold in these kinds of spaces. You did extrapolate that OP is of this opinion, after all. I wonder if you think there's any truth behind it, and if so, why that is the case,
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 08:20 AM
3

You make mid six figures working in the humanities?? I'm extremely curious as to how you've managed to achieve that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 08:16 AM
–

It's completely in your power to block him and move on.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/24 11:16 PM
–

Nice ad-hominem. It's overwhelmingly clear that you're arguing in bad faith.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/24 11:05 PM
–

Of course. Those currently holding power have every incentive to censor and otherwise suppress the middle class. And men are much more likely to pursue wealth than women....
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/24 11:01 PM
1

Exactly. They're all with the same top 10% of men while the rest rot on video games and studying. It's feudalistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/24 04:06 PM
1

So what do men want from women exactly? Since women clearly have quite the bucket list for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/24 05:05 PM
1

That sounds dystopic, for various reasons. It not only incentivizes prostitution but assumes the underlying issue is a lack of sex, when it's really a lack of romantic love.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/24 09:28 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter