TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

EmpathyFabrication Archive

View 0 posts and 22 comments by EmpathyFabrication on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

I think basically better and earlier education. RP just isn't empirically based and doesn't stand up to logical scrutiny. It's why all the RP literature is anecdotal reports with trust me bro sources. It's also why all the RP literature sounds convincing and preachy as if a knowledgeable guide were showing a less knowledgeable or younger initiate the way, despite not actually saying anything meaningful. There isn't anything particularly distinct about RP from any other propaganda. RP is just the…
/r/ExRedPill29/06/26 08:16 PM
1

It takes lots of personal practice and going on dates and meeting people and starting new relationships to figure out what you personally like in a partner. I think that's why RP appeals to so many young men who are inexperienced and see it as a shortcut to some magic knowledge that applies in every situation. The fundamental reason that RP sucks is that it isn't based on empiricism and there's no one set of rules that apply to every man's viewpoint towards relationships. It's why I keep calling…
/r/ExRedPill08/09/25 02:30 PM
2

Yeah it's RP in a nutshell. Claim to be rational > make unsupported claim that sounds smart > men who are too lazy to figure out adult relationships parrot the claim. It helps these losers digest the simple, palatable RP idea of the world because they're too lazy to figure things out on their own.
/r/ExRedPill06/05/25 12:10 PM
18

Taking an evidence-based approach to adult relationships. That's it in a nutshell. RP appeals to lazy men who want a shortcut to understanding how adult relationships work, and men who are too fearful to admit that they don't have a clue as to how the real world works. It's why RP has so many similarities with the "self-help" genre, and also why RP idolizes the powerful strongman appearance. Go look at the RP sidebar. It's full of shit, and the most important thing is that you don't question it …
/r/ExRedPill03/02/25 02:07 PM
6

This is a big part of what RP comes down to. "What do other people think of me," and does that align with what you're being told to think.
/r/ExRedPill22/11/24 07:13 PM
3

It's always been funny to me that despite RP touting itself as being Alpha male man centric and a philosophy made by men for men, that it actually has very little to do with men's issues. It revolves around talking about women and making excuses for why men can't find relationships.
/r/ExRedPill11/11/24 03:39 PM
3

There's no reconciliation for contradictory beliefs nor any need to reconcile anything. It's not an evidence-based ideology that's meant to be examined logically. RP comes down to long lists of unsubstantiated claims that sound good and attract people who feel left behind or left out in some way. That's why so much of RP is self-help rhetoric, and why it appeals so much to young men. If you start bringing up contradictory information, you're told to read more, get further into RP, etc. The peopl…
/r/ExRedPill04/11/24 03:39 PM
3

Yeah this is textbook RP confirmation bias bullshit. Your initial claim that "men have to be a successful provider to keep a woman," isn't backed up by the paper, where they admit in the abstract that they can draw no final conclusion. I don't see the full text here so I assume you haven't read the full text either.
/r/ExRedPill03/11/24 04:00 PM
5

So feelings lol. That's what I'm talking about. Every RP claim comes down to feelings. "Men only have value if they have money." Okay do my observational feelings cancel out your own because I don't believe this?
/r/ExRedPill03/11/24 03:25 PM
1

What exactly is your claim and what exactly is the evidence for it? Is RP advocating for marriage now?
/r/ExRedPill03/11/24 03:05 PM
3

What evidence is there for those claims?
/r/ExRedPill03/11/24 02:54 PM
2

I don't see any data there on relationship or marriage duration
/r/ExRedPill03/11/24 02:05 PM
2

What evidence is that claim based on?
/r/ExRedPill03/11/24 07:29 AM
3

Yeah specifically what about the redpill, that 10%, makes sense? Just tell me exactly what 10% consists of.
/r/ExRedPill01/11/24 03:50 PM
3

What 10% exactly are you talking about?
/r/ExRedPill01/11/24 03:43 PM
7

RP doesn't make sense. RP isn't evidence based. It uses bad arguments, many of which are logical fallacies, but which sound convincing. That's why so many of the people who have fallen for this stuff are people who feel left behind and that RP offers a path to some kind of successful enlightenment. It doesn't.
/r/ExRedPill01/11/24 02:46 PM
1

Yeah a lot of them that I call out for this kind of activity end up deleting the account.
/r/ExRedPill28/09/24 04:38 PM
1

Because the account I was replying to was most likely a troll account and lack of account verification is a common sign
/r/ExRedPill09/07/24 10:53 AM
1

Why did you never verify your email?
/r/ExRedPill13/02/24 01:03 PM
1

Should be easy questions to answer
/r/ExRedPill13/02/24 01:01 PM
1

Ok. Why were you on reddit for a year before you started posting anything, and why did you never verify your email?
/r/ExRedPill13/02/24 01:00 PM
36

The problem with the RP arguments is that when you start digging into their premises, you uncover all this poorly thought out logic. It's also why a lot of RP principles have this facade of philosophical rhetoric. It makes them seem more legitimate, especially to someone who doesn't know how think critically about arguments. RP rhetoric actually has a lot of similarities with fascist rhetoric, especially those properties put forth in Eco's article Ur-Fascism. The enemy is simultaneously strong a…
/r/ExRedPill08/02/24 06:07 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter