TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Emperorerror Archive

View 4 posts and 196 comments by Emperorerror on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
14

Redditor reading comprehension challenge (impossible) This is about double standards
/r/MensRights08/10/24 12:11 AM
55

Not that's it's there either, though, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 12:09 AM
1

Good points!
/r/MensRights28/09/24 12:18 PM
4

Which is totally reasonable, because a lot of the developing world still needs it. It's overstayed its welcome in the west, but obviously the early stages were important.
/r/MensRights28/09/24 11:38 AM
0

You don't have to make it an axiomatic preference. I prefer women to have some experience. You're entitled to prefer those who don't. But either way it's a preference which is fine.
/r/MensRights31/08/24 04:00 PM
5

I had a read through. Great work! That's very cool that you had such a direct a meaningful impact in several ways.
/r/MensRights29/08/24 03:21 PM
2

Woah, cool! Could you elaborate?
/r/MensRights29/08/24 04:46 AM
6

Love these positive stories!
/r/MensRights15/08/24 06:05 PM
2

So true! Which is one of the reasons why it's so important to call out these nutcases. To make it clear we are actual egalitarians.
/r/MensRights13/08/24 04:21 PM
2

That's good to know for the future -- thanks! Definitely a relief to see that you guys are with me here. And ironic that the person I responded to got themselves banned by reporting me, lol. Or at least someone who agreed with them did.
/r/MensRights13/08/24 03:15 PM
1

This is insane misogyny and deranged. You're giving us all a bad look. Rest assured, readers, that most of us aren't like this.
/r/MensRights13/08/24 01:01 PM
9

Voted. I assume I was supposed to be taking clothes into account. Not sure if that was your intent though. I hope you'll post the results?
/r/seduction18/06/24 01:54 AM
3

Great comment!
/r/seduction13/05/24 03:09 AM
10

The details of that don't matter. This isn't the sex sub. It's the seduction sub.
/r/seduction13/05/24 03:06 AM
15

by the end she was already asking to come back over Redditors reading challenge (impossible)
/r/seduction13/05/24 03:05 AM
-1

But she wasn't lmao, what?
/r/seduction13/05/24 03:05 AM
3

If this is representative of the perspective of people in homogeneous countries that's fucking wild
/r/seduction03/05/24 06:21 PM
21

So just do coffee on the weekend. They listed a million other options and you explain why one doesn't work in one context
/r/seduction30/01/24 04:14 AM
4

Get out of here with this stuff. Comments like these are what make the movement look bad. Preposterous and scientifically unsupported statement.
/r/MensRights29/12/23 12:05 AM
3

Read the post
/r/seduction01/11/23 06:42 PM
3

Literally irrelevant to the point at hand. Evident that you ended there or because of your 3rd grading reading level cannot comprehend anything other than "rULe 1 RuLe 2"
/r/seduction19/09/23 09:59 PM
1

Not sure why you were downvoted and I was upvoted. Preposterous that people don't believe in men and women being friends. Obvious counterargument: how about bi people? No friends allowed?
/r/MensRights13/09/23 04:37 PM
-1

That is absolutely NOT the problem here.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 12:06 PM
2

I know what you mean :/
/r/MensRights04/09/23 12:09 PM
1

Seriously! I am glad to come back to this post and see what I replied to deleted and my own comment upvoted. It was downvoted before. It's really disheartening to see so many crazies. But I guess, on the other hand, maybe nutso extremists is fundamental to having a movement of a certain size, haha. Thank you for the response.
/r/MensRights04/09/23 12:32 AM
9

I find this highly, highly unlikely. You genuinely believe there's a conspiracy where a significant number of moms hate men so much that they're dosing their own sons with cannabis to fuck up their school experience and hiding it from their fathers? Preposterous. The fact that this is upvoted is insane. This is the kind of thing that makes us look like wackjobs.
/r/MensRights03/09/23 01:24 PM
2

Neither do software engineers
/r/MensRights03/09/23 01:50 AM
-9

Yeah, this guy is no less of a degen than a woman doing the same. Come on guys.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 10:33 PM
1

What the fuck
/r/MensRights08/08/23 10:02 PM
12

Are you serious? Mainstream!?
/r/MensRights28/07/23 04:34 PM
7

And the "she almost certainly believes" at the beginning
/r/MensRights21/07/23 06:24 AM
8

I didn't know that the WHO made the statement about health. Obviously not good stats, but a step forward that it's being acknowledged somewhere like that.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 10:28 AM
1

This is completely preposterous and I can't believe it's upvoted. Makes us all look psychotic. You need to touch grass.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 03:18 PM
1

This is so subjective that it's hard to answer imo. But perhaps this will answer it -- sometimes my standard is lower than other times. It's dynamic -- the range of what I find attractive is dynamic. The girl is still within my standard of attractiveness, but my standard of attractiveness is different. I think this is the all-encompassing framework for what other people have mentioned (e.g. perhaps it's been a long time and that results in your standards being lower). I also think that it can ge…
/r/seduction13/07/23 11:45 PM
23

It is one of the strangest phenomena. I've noticed that in other situations too (people describing a situation that's sexist toward men as sexist toward women).
/r/MensRights12/07/23 05:32 PM
2

I just checked wikipedia, and pride month has been around for 53 years and men's mental health month has been around for 74. So you are correct that it's longer. Interestingly, though, wikipedia for men's mental health month says that it's May. So there's no conflict. Lol EDIT: Actually, I screwed up. Was looking at the just regular mental health awareness month wikipedia page. Oops.
/r/MensRights01/07/23 08:54 PM
10

That seems pretty normal to me. I started my reddit account only commenting (and looking at) one subreddit.
/r/MensRights25/06/23 10:56 PM
2

Book by Mark Manson
/r/seduction21/06/23 03:28 PM
1

Read Models
/r/seduction21/06/23 03:18 PM
1

Pussy
/r/seduction11/06/23 03:15 AM
-6

Take some responsibility for your life. This is such an "I am not in control" mindset. You weren't taught? Come on dude. Teach yourself.
/r/seduction10/06/23 06:41 AM
8

Seems unlikely to me that this predated pride -- pride has been around for like 50 years. Correct me if I'm wrong, though.
/r/MensRights05/06/23 09:19 AM
4

Why would you shame someone for using language so well?
/r/MensRights15/12/20 12:03 AM
4

I think this makes sense in theory, but the problem is that people's tastes very far, far more than you think. So what you evaluate to be the "hotter" one, assuming no staggering differences (i.e. someone normal sized and someone obese, for example), there's really no telling what a friend of yours would think vs you.
/r/seduction04/11/20 11:30 PM
1

Oh that's super interesting. I've heard of shadowing in other contexts, like doing this for learning languages, or practicing movements. But I had never considered it for vocal tonality, body language, etc. That's genius!
/r/seduction02/05/20 06:38 PM
4

Agreed that it's rape, and obviously that's a big problem, but that doesn't mean he's a sociopath. That's quite the leap.
/r/seduction02/05/20 06:37 PM
1

I am totally baffled by how many people don't believe this, for a variety of weird reasons. Great write-up OP.
/r/seduction23/04/20 05:32 PM
2

Couldn't agree more about how baffling it is that people don't think this is real. This isn't a crazy story lmao
/r/seduction23/04/20 05:30 PM
1

Don't know how to say something, so you ask a native. Seems pretty straightforward.
/r/seduction23/04/20 05:27 PM
3

It's pretty clear that the person you're responding to is using "attractive" for physical attractiveness exclusively in this case. Have a little awareness, no need to be so willfully obtuse.
/r/seduction22/04/20 06:05 AM
9

When did this sub switch from seduction to incel complaining? It's ridiculous.
/r/seduction20/04/20 07:54 PM
1

I'm a big fan of long messages and I like this idea of doing it over email. Thanks, and good luck!
/r/seduction31/03/20 11:33 PM
3

And /r/meditation
/r/seduction31/03/20 01:28 AM
5

This doesn't mean stare at her from across the room through a stethoscope lmfao It's when you're actually talking to her.
/r/seduction27/03/20 04:48 PM
1

Ghosting is definitely not a positive term, worry not!
/r/seduction26/03/20 09:12 PM
0

No you dumbass, it's about the phrasing, not the idea itself.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 08:07 PM
1

It's about phrasing, obviously. Instead of saying it snidely, say, "Hey! Just so you know, 'recognize' is misspelled! Make sure to fix that before sending it."
/r/MensRights08/03/20 08:06 PM
-10

No reason to be rude about it
/r/MensRights08/03/20 02:20 PM
1

It's because it's a meme. Full stop. It's low quality content like this that degrades a subreddit. If this were a discussion post about whether pick up is worth doing, thoughts on interactions between it and relationships, what skills work for hookups vs looking for more serious stuff, etc. Then that would be great! But this is trash.
/r/seduction08/03/20 01:07 PM
6

Some of the worst comments I've had the displeasure of reading in this thread.
/r/seduction05/03/20 04:52 AM
1

It literally says "all men" with title case lmao. This post is about you, me, and OP.
/r/MensRights22/02/20 05:14 PM
6

Your martial arts comparison is so good. We need the MMA of seduction!
/r/seduction12/02/20 08:46 PM
5

Hold on, what? I thought Anthony Bourdain commit suicide.
/r/MensRights11/02/20 10:48 PM
1

He said so in the post
/r/seduction08/02/20 09:29 PM
1

In the comment he said it's cuz he wants kids. Was written a little weirdly tho so I can understand missing it
/r/seduction25/01/20 03:48 PM
-27

That sounds unlikely and statistically difficult to show, could you elaborate?
/r/MensRights22/01/20 08:23 PM
24

Makes sense, since they don't have to. And as all of us here know, it improves with practice.
/r/seduction17/01/20 04:11 AM
15

I'm constantly astounded at how much people's types vary. Goes for men and women.
/r/seduction15/01/20 03:38 PM
22

"Victim," and similar words, are also often female.
/r/MensRights11/01/20 04:19 PM
3

I don't think it's really a big deal. If they work directly with you, sure that might not be smart, but there are plenty of people from work you only see from time to time - who cares.
/r/seduction30/12/19 02:11 PM
12

Hey man, as /u/minibooz says, There’s no correlation between the two. You can be a liberal and support men’s rights! Not all Bernie supporters are feminists Plus, I really doubt Bernie himself holds the same views as this mod. Just because there are supporters like this doesn't mean he's like this. There are plenty of Bernie supporters, myself included, who support men's rights.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 11:41 AM
47

That's very frustrating, especially because I doubt Bernie himself would hold this view.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 11:38 AM
75

I think you guys are a picturing different nope and laugh than I am. She could just not be comfortable yet.
/r/seduction20/12/19 09:39 PM
2

Fyi, you wrote "mans search front" instead of "mans search for meaning" on the original post
/r/seduction03/12/19 07:56 AM
39

You don't need some crazy opener, just have to say hi. This is the way to do it
/r/seduction29/11/19 02:57 AM
4

Thanks for the response! I appreciate your advice. I think I had the mentality that cold (ish, in this case) approaches were only for hook ups, but obviously there's no reason that has to be the case. Especially if you put yourself in places where you're more likely to find someone who would fit well. I guess even for relationships it's still a numbers game! I can up those numbers myself rather than just have them go up passively from going to work, the gym, etc. That said, I think the bigger co…
/r/seduction27/11/19 03:10 PM
3

Dude! I complete relate with that last sentence. I wrestle with it all the time.
/r/seduction27/11/19 01:50 PM
1

Thanks for the recommendation! I'll check him out.
/r/seduction27/11/19 01:48 PM
1

Couldn't agree more man, it's tough. Hopefully with time we'll get better with these rare times
/r/seduction27/11/19 01:03 AM
7

Thanks for the relatability my dude. Glad I'm not the only one. It's tough, cuz I feel like I got all the seduction skills, but a girl I actually like comes around so rarely that it's real hard to apply the skills in that situation
/r/seduction27/11/19 12:28 AM
33

My primary issue with this whole oneitis / abundance mentality dichotomy is that I think it's missing something critical. I have an abundance mentality when it comes to attracting girls. I think I could attract pretty much any girl and I know there are tons of girls out there. What I don't have an abundance mentality for is girls I'd want to attract. So whenever someone shows up I'm genuinely interested in, that's when I get oneitis going. Not because I feel like there's no one that will date me…
/r/seduction26/11/19 11:05 PM
2

No idea why this is downvoted. It's a very respectful and chill response to a slightly aggressive comment.
/r/seduction23/11/19 08:36 AM
-7

???
/r/seduction13/11/19 08:04 PM
2

Yeah it's not about magic words, it's about adding to the contextual experience bucket
/r/seduction13/11/19 08:03 PM
-10

This is literally what pickup YouTubers do lol
/r/seduction13/11/19 08:02 PM
4

Yeah I think there's a study where after masturbating, testosterone goes up for 7 days before starting to drop. I'm not sure if there's any info on if it turns back around, how much it drops, etc.
/r/seduction09/11/19 02:33 PM
54

Pretty sure that's the joke bro
/r/seduction09/11/19 02:30 PM
1

Damn well fair enough then. I might give it a go.
/r/seduction09/11/19 12:48 AM
1

Right, but the whole point of this subreddit is to not be "most guys" irl.
/r/seduction08/11/19 12:40 PM
2

Here's what I'm wondering. You've said this is out of character for you. So then when you meet up or call, how do you be your actual self while also not seeming fake by making such a transition?
/r/seduction08/11/19 12:28 PM
-2

That's obviously a very different scenario since it's not agreed upon that life starts at conception.
/r/MensRights12/10/19 12:36 PM
1

That's clearly a different scenario since not everyone believes fetuses are people.
/r/MensRights12/10/19 12:34 PM
15

Freud is outdated psychology.
/r/seduction12/10/19 05:15 AM
-2

Cant believe this sub is such an echo chamber that the actual answer isn't upvoted. It's because another person is involved, the child.
/r/MensRights12/10/19 05:13 AM
0

Except that this isn't nonsense, this is psychological fact you'd find in any psychology 101 textbook or introductory class at any university.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 03:17 AM
1

It's okay for the same reason that there's nothing wrong with saying that women are, on average, more neurotic. It's the scientific term in psychology.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 10:57 PM
2

Thank you for the detailed response, I do appreciate it. All possibilities for sure! But I'd need a study indicating a severity disparity to believe it. I'm not sure if there's any literature indicating otherwise, either. I do have some background in psychology and neuroscience which is partially why I ask.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 10:53 PM
3

The scientific literature does show that women are more prone to depression and anxiety and that men are more likely to display aggressive behaviors. This isn't sexism. These are just average differences between the sexes. Obviously there are depressed men and aggressive women, but statistically, there are more depressed / anxious women and aggressive men. It's just psychology.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 12:19 PM
2

Could I have a source on the latter part? I've never heard that.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 12:15 PM
2

The more experience you have, the easier it is, in my experience. I'm very surprised to hear that that's not yours.
/r/seduction01/09/19 09:37 AM
3

Okay, perfect, all that matters here is whether it's okay or not. Glad we can agree. It's the same action to a different end. What's the answer, then, to is it comparable? Yes, obviously. Nobody here is saying it isn't worse to rape someone than steal from them - clearly it is. But that doesn't mean you can't compare the two crimes when they occur in the same way. Finally, regarding a "woman failing," are you trying to say Cardi B. just made a mistake? She did it a bunch of times! This wasn't so…
/r/MensRights31/07/19 02:41 AM
26

Obviously the severity of a crime is relevant to a punishment, but it's not relevant to the discussion about whether or not it's okay, and that's what this discussion is about. Your original comment was the strawman, not my own.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 10:42 PM
29

The severity of the crime is hardly relevant. Are you being deliberately obtuse? You think it's okay to roofie someone and steal from then?
/r/MensRights30/07/19 10:37 PM
32

The /s at the end of the comment signifies sarcasm.
/r/MensRights25/07/19 07:40 AM
-3

Who cares dude, that is such needless pedantry.
/r/MensRights10/06/19 06:44 AM
1

Disagree. Doesn't create any emotion. It's all logistics. Sounds very serious
/r/seduction22/05/19 01:14 AM
5

Wait, it was that explicit? Can someone explain? How was this allowed?
/r/MensRights12/04/19 06:04 PM
4

Exactly. Just like girls don't know how to pickup girls, guys don't know how to pickup guys. There are probably some universal things like the ones you mentioned, but there will also be a lot of differences.
/r/seduction09/04/19 03:12 AM
14

So many people not believing you in this thread lmao
/r/seduction08/04/19 06:23 AM
8

The comments there are much more civil and reasonable than I had expected, actually.
/r/MensRights03/04/19 03:05 PM
7

I'm not an outsider to this sub. And neither is Redd, I imagine. The reason we take issue with this is because being this outrageously oblivious takes away from the real issues men face. As another user said, it's embarrassing to MRA that so many of us apparently can't see that her point is that all those things would be fucked up done to men.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 09:30 AM
8

Exactly. It really delegitimizes any actual issues.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 08:20 AM
2

Exactly! What's most curious to me is their inability to see that all it's saying is, "you’re doing this to us but you wouldn’t like it if we did this to you." What is it that they're missing? Did they just skip the first sentence? What's up with this weirdness?
/r/MensRights12/03/19 07:33 AM
13

Right? It's absolutely mind boggling that they can't see it. I'm not exaggerating when I say that. I wouldn't even call it obvious that that's the point, because it's so obvious that it doesn't even deserve mentioning, from my perspective.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 07:20 AM
157

I don't understand how you guys are unable to comprehend that her whole point is that doing those things to men is outrageous. She's equating a lack of abortion rights to doing all these things. It's literally the whole point of her tweet that women dictating all these things for men would be absurd. That's the POINT!! Christ.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 05:52 AM
46

Asians and Indians also get fucked by a lot of these things.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 04:03 AM
3

Thanks for that! I appreciate your time and effort. Interesting.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 10:02 PM
4

Fair enough, I'll look it up.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 06:57 PM
7

What happened with the Superbowl? And the Superbowl was on YouTube?
/r/MensRights26/02/19 06:27 PM
10

Different people are different and in different circumstances Sometimes weed relaxes me. In this situation, it would definitely give me anxiety.
/r/seduction21/02/19 06:55 AM
2

Yeah exactly, cuz then there's no point to be made.
/r/MensRights18/02/19 10:14 PM
1

Nobody said they were the last free seats.
/r/MensRights18/02/19 12:59 PM
-7

People are way too mad in these comments. Like fucking Christ, 99% of people will move the magazines or bag if you ask. If there's enough space, no reason not to use it.
/r/MensRights18/02/19 02:51 AM
5

Yeah. I can't believe this post hasn't been taken down or at least had the moderators post a stickied comment or something.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 11:06 PM
2

Okay, that makes sense! Perfect way to acknowledge the question because any serious response possible would have made it weird.
/r/seduction15/02/19 03:55 PM
1

But it isn't, not at this point. She's the first one.
/r/seduction15/02/19 03:54 PM
2

Why is this smart?
/r/seduction15/02/19 05:33 AM
1

That's a fair point. I've never considered that - that is probably the greatest privilege there is.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 12:36 AM
26

Very nuanced perspective. I agree with both you and /u/TheSheepGod_.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 06:09 AM
14

The big takeaway from that is that there's no greater privilege than wealth or disadvantage than poverty.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 08:02 PM
32

Keep in mind this isn't a right wing sub. Plenty of very liberal people are here, too. It's not just left vs. right.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 08:18 AM
1

The problem here is that queer people are always going to take the male slots, which is obviously bs, since it means women are being prioritized over men. Say what? There will be 7 male and 7 female delegates. Because male is replaced with not female, people who call themselves non-binary or something like that will take the "not female" slots rather than the "female" slots. As such, they're taking the male slots, not the female slots. Does that make more sense?
/r/MensRights15/01/19 12:16 AM
1

I'm glad it was clear to some people. I thought maybe I didn't give enough info. The problem here, in my opinion, is that because of this classification, queer people are only ever going to take the slots of men, which is prioritizing women over men.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 06:55 PM
1

Well this is delegate elections in the Democratic party. For actual government elections to the California senate, etc. you have male or female, I think. The reason it's relevant here is that delegates in the Democratic party (in California, at least) are divided evenly between men and women (which itself could be questioned, but that's a question for another day). So it's been like that, but now they've changed it to dividing evenly between self-identitied females and other than self-identitied…
/r/MensRights14/01/19 06:54 PM
2

Of course not, it's just that they always elected half men and half women before (which is itself questionable, but that's a question for another day), and now it's changed to half self-identitied female and half other than self-identitied female. So they divide it like that because it's the two groups. The problem here is that queer people are always going to take the male slots, which is obviously bs, since it means women are being prioritized over men.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 06:51 PM
2

It's not the voter's gender. It's the candidate's gender. As it says, "You may distribute your votes as you wish between self-identitied female and other than self-identitied female candidates." The problem here is that queer people are always going to take the male slots rather than the female slots, so women are being prioritized over men.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 06:49 PM
1

No, it's just that they're categorized as "other than self-identitied female." The problem here is that women are prioritized over men -- queer people are always going to take the male slots rather than the female slots.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 06:45 PM
1

Thanks for finding that. It's so frustrating. Queer people are always going to take the male slots rather than the female slots. Why is it more important to have women than men?
/r/MensRights14/01/19 06:43 PM
6

I should clarify that this isn't the voter's gender, it's the candidate's.
/r/MensRights13/01/19 08:56 PM
1

Lmao wtf? What is OP on about, then? You gotta wonder how he had the interpretation he did.
/r/seduction10/01/19 01:59 AM
1

Good shit!
/r/seduction17/12/18 07:42 PM
11

.5 is pretty damn low too lol
/r/seduction15/12/18 07:12 PM
1

Nobody thinks both of those things lmao
/r/MensRights06/12/18 05:48 PM
1

Apologies if I was unclear -- I'm white as well. And to be frank I think I'm moderately attractive and I do fine. The thing is, yes, it's all attitude, yes, you should have a good perspective, etc etc. but you have to admit that everyone gets genetic advantages and disadvantages and that's just how it is in life. Also - I want you to know that I don't think that large block of text was in vain even though it wasn't immediately relevant to me -- I'm sure it touched some guys out there and your st…
/r/seduction04/12/18 07:19 PM
13

It's not racist to have racial preferences. You can't control who you're attracted to, and it would be unreasonable to ask that. But the fact remains that east and south Asians are generally not considered very attractive in Western societies.
/r/seduction02/12/18 09:01 PM
1

Clubs suck try daygame
/r/seduction02/12/18 06:26 PM
7

To be fair, minority wasn't the best choice of words. What he means is non white/black. Still, as another poster said, the advice doesn't change.
/r/seduction02/12/18 06:18 PM
144

Cop in panties-munching scandal speaks out
/r/MensRights27/11/18 02:40 PM
0

You can't suppress downs syndrome lmao
/r/MensRights22/11/18 08:05 PM
-34

Hey man, this is incorrect. It's been very robustly shown that depression, anxiety, etc. are much more common among women than men, and not just through self-reporting. Yes, it's true, men are less likely to see someone about their mental issues, but that's not the only measure we have.
/r/MensRights22/11/18 08:04 PM
1

For a hookup why does it matter what their personality is like Doesn't to me
/r/seduction04/11/18 12:58 PM
3

If you're just looking for a hookup who cares lol
/r/seduction04/11/18 11:03 AM
2

Super relatable
/r/seduction27/10/18 05:48 AM
3

Greentexts aren't inherently untrue. There are plenty of true ones. It's just a format.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 01:52 PM
3

You know it's interesting you say all that, because it makes perfect sense, but I never thought about it that way. What a good observation. The reason is probably just simply that among the three it's the skill I've pursued the least. What it comes down to is that I can easily imagine a conversation beginning, middle, and end, with both a random and a girl I know well, whereas I've got no idea for girls I know just a little. I'm not thinking of a particular girl, it's just something I've thought…
/r/seduction13/09/18 01:34 AM
0

Wow I have to try this
/r/seduction02/08/18 11:51 PM
3

I feel that. Super disconcerting.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 07:24 AM
1

Agreed. Really irritating when this subreddit devolves from genuine issues to neckbeard whining.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 09:06 PM
6

Right? I can smell the Cheeto dust off that guy.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 09:05 PM
36

The whole point of this thread is that it's okay to have preferences, lmao. It's ok for men to like big boobs, and it's okay for women to like big dicks. Sorry you aren't gifted and are pissed about it. What you're saying is also just not true. Vaginas don't stretch out from sex with big dicks. This thread is a shitshow.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 09:03 PM
1

I disagree, but fair enough.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 06:11 PM
4

The reason it's less of an issue for me is because I think it's quite likely that if a war did reach the point of a draft today, the government would make women a part of it too.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 04:57 AM
6

Make sure to sit next to her. Don't trap her next to a wall, though.
/r/seduction06/07/18 01:41 AM
69

Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but you know we're talking about the UK, right?
/r/MensRights05/07/18 09:35 PM
4

Why does it matter to have sinks and dryers separated? All you need is a private bathroom if that's what you're looking for.
/r/MensRights29/06/18 04:34 PM
4

In a lot of places, you'll have individual bathrooms and then one sink area
/r/MensRights29/06/18 04:24 PM
101

Still not a fan of you telling them all about the challenge, but always an interesting read nonetheless.
/r/seduction29/06/18 05:42 AM
29

You dumb motherfucker have you not read any of these? He says he gets their permission.
/r/seduction29/06/18 05:41 AM
63

What a bro
/r/seduction25/06/18 11:08 AM
10

That feminist argument is like the Reaganomics of social issues. Just help the other group (women, the rich), and the other will benefit as a result (men, the poor).
/r/MensRights24/06/18 10:24 PM
1

It's above average for the US.
/r/seduction20/06/18 06:33 AM
1

Yeah, hopefully that's all there is to it.
/r/seduction19/04/18 03:26 PM
1

This is really relatable. There's definitely something wrong about it but I don't know how to fix it.
/r/seduction19/04/18 02:11 PM
7

The law in India ignores castes. They still exist, socially, but not as a result of the government. Don't make assumptions like that.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 04:11 PM
-4

How the fuck could an animal exist that breaks its own tail from wagging it too hard lmfao
/r/MensRights17/02/18 07:27 PM
2

Glad someone said this.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 04:47 PM
9

Yeah. This is like people reading headlines but not the article. It's okay to have places that aren't political, and you should inform yourself of that before making a political statement there.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 10:51 PM
3

Fair enough on the clickbait point. That was just my main thought having read the article, though!
/r/MensRights23/07/17 01:56 PM
2

Mostly unrelated, but I like your username.
/r/seduction15/02/17 07:07 AM
13

Literally do anything but do it passionately That's the key
/r/seduction20/01/17 01:16 AM
6

And what about in base 32? A! Wait that adds nothing
/r/seduction11/12/16 09:37 AM
3

I'm so happy for you OP :). I could completely empathize with a lot of your emotions throughout the story, beginning, middle, and end. You really captured the feelings so well I knew exactly what you meant. Anyway I'm glad you feel like you've really leveled up!
/r/seduction11/12/16 09:34 AM
1

In case you misunderstand, I was quoting the video, then being sarcastic.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 07:23 PM
6

"Do you think teaching men (and women) that date rape is wrong is a bad thing?" Because that's clearly what the MRA is saying...
/r/MensRights08/10/13 12:46 AM
1

Vermont, fuck yeah.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 02:22 AM
1

This is clearly sarcasm...
/r/MensRights18/07/13 05:59 AM
1

"If a prenup let’s him keep all his money, then I’d rather not continue staying with someone like that." dafuq
/r/MensRights11/07/13 04:22 AM
1

"A local anti-feminism group." Of course they describe it like that.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 08:12 PM
3

"A local anti-feminism group." Of course they described it like that.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 08:12 PM
3

Well it's +209 now :p
/r/MensRights10/07/13 07:27 PM
2

My thoughts exactly.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 10:35 PM
1

While the double standards are bullshit, obviously, I must admit that as a 16 year-old, I'd tap that.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 10:32 PM
1

Kickstarter it up!
/r/MensRights03/07/13 10:28 PM
1

Really though -- both should be freed. An 18 year old having sex with a 16 year old is not an issue.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 02:57 PM
2

In this situation, I think the OP (woman) is right. I'm basing it on my opinion that both parents need to want a kid to have one. Thoughts?
/r/MensRights27/03/13 08:09 PM
1

If you wanted a women only course, you should have gone to a women only college.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 07:55 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter