TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

EnderESXC Archive

View 1 post and 40 comments by EnderESXC on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
28

DiscussionEnderESXC/r/MensRights26/02/15 02:20 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

All feminist hypocrisy aside, we really should just outlaw the draft for men rather than include women.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 08:58 PM
2

Dude, give it a rest. None of what you're saying is even remotely close, not regarding what has been said, not regarding what criminal law/civil law is, not what your own constitution says, not even what property rights are. You have given no examples, no refutations, no substance of any kind. I'm honestly not sure if you're just a troll or this is just the Mexican education system at work. Either way I'm not wasting any more of my time on you. Enjoy your new "communist" government. In the meant…
/r/MensRights12/07/18 08:49 AM
2

That's a stretch. But you obviously know what I mean; A vetting process BEFORE reaching court. This should go without saying. Okay, but what is that vetting process supposed to be? There's no feasible alternative that I can see. Ones that require intervention, yes. Yeah, those are pretty much all going to be criminal cases. A lawsuit, aka a civil case, is something else. I can't believe I have to explain this to somebody. Could you quote where I made an argument to that extent? Thanks. You said …
/r/MensRights12/07/18 08:22 AM
2

I disagree. There should be a vetting process before it reaches that point for the very reason that we see here; Going to court can be expensive and can be used to extort money out of people that cannot do so without great sacrifice. The court is the vetting process. What else are we supposed to do? Who else can vet a court case besides a judge in a civil case? Let me stop YOU right there, no, I'm not. What I described can and does apply to all forms of law. For example, a land dispute, a non-in…
/r/MensRights12/07/18 07:32 AM
3

Your system is broken. You shouldn't have to go to court if you were simply obeying the law. Yes the systems are different, I'm saying your system is wrong. Oh yes, our legal system is so ludicrously broken, how do we manage to do anything around here. Give me a break. Lawsuits need to go to court. The law is not something you can just look up, there are endless numbers of ways that a given set of actions can be both legal and illegal given the right context, especially in a common law system wh…
/r/MensRights12/07/18 06:49 AM
2

Uhhh... that's not how the law works in my nation. You cannot be sued for obeying the law. Exactly, you live in a nation with a different system. Mexico has a different legal tradition than the English system (which is what Australia and other former English nations such as America, Canada, etc use). The case wouldn't go very far and would likely be thrown out by the judge in favor of the barber, but it would still need to go to court to determine the merits of the suit and so the judge can awar…
/r/MensRights12/07/18 05:43 AM
2

But why would it even go to court? he is following the law. Because that's how law works. All cases, at least in countries using the English system such as America and, presumably, Australia, go to court to be determined who is in the right. Even if the case is completely frivolous, it still has to go to court so a judge can award damages and throw out the case. The only time it doesn't is when one party either settles out of court or drops the suit.
/r/MensRights12/07/18 05:25 AM
0

Unless they have an allergy, they're making a choice not to eat animal products and there's nothing actually stopping them from eating meat other than their arbitrary choice. Meat-eaters shouldn't be expected to go out of their way to pander to somebody's arbitrary choice not to eat what's being served when there's perfectly serviceable food right in front of them. I'm sure they will understand it if eating vegetables is against your morals... I'm sure they wouldn't be preachy about it at all
/r/PussyPassDenied10/01/18 06:26 PM
0

It's exactly the same for the vegans. There's nothing stopping them from eating meat, unless they actually have an allergy to it (which is uncommon, compared to things like pollen or peanuts).
/r/PussyPassDenied02/01/18 11:00 PM
2

This is 100% not PPD, but goddamn, that was glorious. It did make a hell of a lot of pussy passes, though, both in the picture's comments and the reddit comments.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/07/16 04:16 AM
1

Why did they even bother having Milo on the show if they weren't going to let him speak?
/r/MensRights04/07/15 08:31 PM
1

I tried to leave 4 times already, but you kept coming back. You want out? There's the door.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 10:34 PM
2

Have you thought about opening a cinema? You could make a lot of money with all of this projection.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 09:20 PM
1

From your point of view, I'm never going to "get it". From my point of view, 'tis you who isn't getting it. Now look here. I have tried to leave thrice now and each time you've come back. You can hardly claim it to be "attacking" when you keep trying to come back and get up in my business. Now I would suggest that you listen to me and kindly go away. You wanted out at the beginning, I gave you an out. I gave you an out not once, not twice, but three times. I am doing no attacking here, if anythi…
/r/MensRights25/05/15 08:01 PM
1

no, I haven't done the same. From your last post: I realized that I was being just unfair to the individuals in your movement as you are being to me right now. this is going in circles and has nothing to do with what I aimed to understand. Then why are you still talking back at me? I thought you were the one saying you weren't going to comment back a couple posts ago. Look, I tried to end this off peacefully. Regardless of whether it was actually peaceful or not, it's still an end. Now, please. …
/r/MensRights25/05/15 06:22 AM
1

Oh, you're back. Did you miss me? Say, whatever happened to "I simply won't comment anymore unless you can stay on topic."? I do enjoy our little chats, but you seem to be sending me mixed messages. You're right in maybe I shouldn't have put the word feminist in the title but I honestly didn't even really think about it too much when I did it because its not something I feel any shame in saying. It's not that it's shameful to be a feminist, it's how you used the term. I wonder if you would be so…
/r/MensRights25/05/15 04:58 AM
2

No, I am not obliged to prove myself to you, or anyone else who would like to question my motives, you are not entitled to an explanation. Indeed I'm not, but you aren't helping your case any by saying so. One could be remiss in thinking that perhaps you just don't have a counter-point and want to end this quickly... Intriguing... I am sorry you take issue with my writing style I take issue with the attention seeking nature of your post. If you are coming off this way, perhaps you should fix it.…
/r/MensRights25/05/15 04:10 AM
1

That title is because I fundamentally disagree with most of you on a lot of things and I wanted you to know that before commenting so that this wouldn't get derailed into something else Yes, but why is it in the title? It could just as easily been in the body paragraph where you explain your position, but you put it in the title, the spot where you try to get people to come and look at your post. By putting it in the title, you are employing click-bait tactics in order to lure us in and get us t…
/r/MensRights25/05/15 01:56 AM
2

You're not here for help at all, you're here to convert. First off, the title. We would have had NO idea about you being a feminist until you had said so. By putting it in the title, you are trying to attract us here and makes us go "oh, feminists don't hate men!". Yet, look at that last paragraph. Some things jump out at me. I've discussed this with some female friends and my mother and they're of the opinion that it should be up to the father to make that decision and that if he wants to do it…
/r/MensRights24/05/15 09:06 AM
2

Seeing women that are sexualized makes them feel bad about themselves so they took a leaf out of their other leftist buddy, the Communists' book and try to snick off the heads of any blades of grass that rise above the rest.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 12:05 AM
1

I've basically known how to fill my own gas tank since before I could see over the steering wheel in my car, same goes for most people I know. How on EARTH could these two not know how to fill up a tank of gas when they both clearly are of an age to be driving? THIS IS BASIC S--T, PEOPLE, NOT ROCKET SCIENCE.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/15 09:50 AM
5

Let me lay some hypotheticals down for you. Scenario A: A man is walking along with his wife. This man is your average guy, 6 foot, 185 lbs, decent shape. The wife is also average, 5'4", 160 lbs, decent shape, but not as strong as the man by a decent margin (he could bench maybe 40-60 lbs more than she could, for instance). They're walking along and, for whatever justified or injustified reason, the wife hits the man repeatedly. Swats to the face, punches to the arm, etc. Eventually he gets fed …
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/15 09:19 AM
1

If it is the case that she passed out (a normal part of growing up for western kids) and was sexually assaulted In what way is this a normal part of growing up? No, she is below the age and shouldn't have been drinking. Period. If she got drunk illegally, then she should have to face the consequences of her actions, be it rape, theft, etc. How do you think should be she punished for being sexually assaulted and publicly humiliated? Why do you think the man that did it isn't responsible and it wo…
/r/MensRights04/04/15 07:44 PM
2

No, I blame the girl in this instance. If this was/is in my country, she's below the legal drinking age by several years. She decided to get drunk below the age and she should be responsible for the consequences. Obviously, if the girl is 15 and below the age of consent (again, asuming this is my country, might be different where you are), then the guy (assuming he's above the age of consent) should be charged with rape, because that would be statuatory regardless of her mental state. TL:DR: I b…
/r/MensRights03/04/15 02:13 PM
-1

We learn it in America, but only because it's part of the American Revolution unit.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 09:58 PM
1

Im making a video that'll go more in depth but in the mean time, here's the meat and potatoes. Back in late August 2014, Eron Gjoni (ex of Zoe Quinn) released a post about how Quinn cheated on him with games critics to get favorable coverage. These accusation are unverified as of my knowledge. People then cut and ran with the story, stepping away from Quinn and towards journalistic ethics as a whole. One one hand, you have KotakuInAction, who want better ethical practices in games media and want…
/r/MensRights10/03/15 11:26 PM
2

Unfortunately, my state has the two-party consent clause to recordings. I can't record the lecture, but I certainly can still write down what he says.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 03:14 AM
6

Yes, he was indeed. However, the teacher said he was not. That's part of the problem.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 02:34 AM
8

"The men's rights movement denies the existence of male privilege." We do, don't we?
/r/MensRights22/01/15 04:32 AM
2

Yeah, that would totally never happen, right?
/r/MensRights20/01/15 04:57 AM
1

"She wanna be a man, I'm gonna treat you like a man!" F**king YES. This needs to be the way all people live their lives.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/01/15 03:02 AM
2

Egalitarianism is the movement you're looking for.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 10:10 PM
1

Oh, yes. I know all about how it's used in England. However, in America (where I, Bill Burr, and I presume the writer are all from), it's been claimed that ct is incredibly sexist and mysogynist. I think it's bullst, and so I was attempting to make light of that.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/01/15 01:00 PM
1

Don't forget the many charges of resisting arrest.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/01/15 12:49 PM
0

Aren't people legally obligated to keep one of those window breaker things in case of emergencies? He should have just grabbed that, assuming he had one. If not, I'm impressed he could break it with his bare hands.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/01/15 12:34 PM
1

It's great how you claim that this sub is mysogynistic and sexist but then use a supposedly mysogynistic/sexist slur yourself (I'm talking about c**t, by the way).
/r/PussyPassDenied04/01/15 12:11 PM
1

I know this is going to be hard for you, but I think you need to deliver her an ultimatum. Tell her if she doesn't clean up her act, then you leave. You don't have to throw your life away for her, you are not her slave, and she has no right to force you to fail classes or lose your job just so she can be clingy.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 07:43 AM
1

How can you say that men don't have issues? This thread alone proves your point invalid, not to mention this subreddit, the many youtube channels, other subreddits, various websites, etc? Men have plenty of issues worth fighting for.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 07:34 AM
56

"I'll call 911!" B***h, they ARE 911
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/14 05:24 AM
7

I like how the uploader has the audacity to title the video "Police Brutality". Just.... wat
/r/PussyPassDenied16/10/14 03:47 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter