TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

EndlessTosser Archive

View 4 posts and 193 comments by EndlessTosser on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

If they refer to all trans people as 'she' you have already lost. But if you want to keep on trying, remind those that disagree that most of the Men's Rights issues will end up helping more minority men than majority men. For example, our desire to reform education is going to have the biggest impact on those who are falling behind the most, namely minority men, as opposed to straight, white, cisgendered, etc. males. Demanding for adequate mental health assistance and suicide counseling? That's …
/r/MensRights06/04/15 06:19 PM
18

both sides want gender equality next sentence is about pay gap Into the trash it goes.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 06:14 PM
1

This is the first I'd heard about that. Where did you pick it up?
/r/MensRights05/04/15 07:11 AM
1

Gotta be new to be news.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 11:05 PM
1

So the only person worth responding to is the one who's treating it like a joke? Here to just troll along, eh?
/r/MensRights27/03/15 06:55 AM
2

Looks like my economic is -3.5, while my social is -5.69. Left and Libertarian.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 05:20 AM
4

The comments seem somewhat undecided.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 06:45 AM
2

In response to your language challenge, it's not possible a man, in this day and age, to cause pregnancy to happen to a woman; this is because women have medical, surgical, pharmaceutical, and legal ways out of, around, and to avert the consequences of pregnancy. That's why many people are taking umbridge with it. Pregnancy doesn't, "just happen" to a woman any more than someone can trip, fall, and land on a full syringe of heroin, so implying that it's something a man does to a woman rather tha…
/r/MensRights25/02/15 10:53 PM
2

In short, you do think as poorly of women who don't know who the father is. Goddamn, just answer the question, it's not like it was that difficult. This is not a complicated line of thought. Haha, I like how you think I don't get it, but it's you who don't get it. This is what I mean by, "You are the stupid one, not me, so there!" Do try to keep up. They get state aid Yes they do. Society has already agreed to help raise the children birthed by women who don't or won't keep the father involved. …
/r/MensRights25/02/15 08:51 PM
2

"You are the stupid one, not me, so there!" "I'll prove it, too. I mean, I can't do it right now, though, but I will prove it." Do you think as poorly of women who's men have financially aborted as you do of single mothers who don't know who the father is?
/r/MensRights25/02/15 03:37 PM
4

What a surprise, feminist demands special treatment. News at 11.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 03:01 PM
2

The woman has decided to bring a child into this world without the financial support of her partner, whom she cannot demand the government force to pay her. Or she decides to abort based on the information that the money she expects to have will no longer be available. This is not a complicated line of thought.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 03:00 PM
31

you make someone pregnant No man can make a woman pregnant aside from physical restraint and tampering with her medication, period. Women have plan B, the morning after pill, abortion, parental abandonment (Baby Moses laws), put the child up for adoption, etc in lieu of actually being a parent. Men, contrary-wise, are stuck with 'pre-pregnancy' options. We have no 'oh shit' options available after she has decided to say fuck it. That's not equal, and you know it. How does that work (from the POV…
/r/MensRights25/02/15 04:58 AM
8

It's entitled to believe that you should have a choice as to when you have a child? How fucking delusional. You do know that most people choose to have their children, right? And when it's an accident there's a somewhat high chance that it isn't. Which means that someone is making a choice. A choice to be a parent. There is no social mechanism that randomly drops babies into people's lives and demands that they care for them (which would be assuming responsibility for a child against your will).…
/r/MensRights25/02/15 04:03 AM
38

If commentary on door opening is a part of your ideology, you've run out of actual problems. It doesn't matter what your stance is on door opening, it's idiotic.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 03:44 PM
1

It is not the point of those who are defending to ascertain what evidence is 'enough' or sufficient. The jury is who must make that decision. If you yourself are having reasonable doubt that there is enough evidence, why do you believe that the rape happened at all?
/r/MensRights12/02/15 10:11 PM
1

Holy shit, I am so bad at Reddit, thank you.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 10:01 PM
2

Her problem is that no one gives a shit about her and she can't make money if no one gives a shit. So she tries to start shit to trick gullible morons into giving her money. End of fucking story. You want to help her? Stop giving a fuck, then maybe she'll realize that she should improve her games and stop doing idiotic things like this.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 05:21 AM
4

Okay, so one: the wikipedia article actually says nothing about the disproving of the phenomenon like you're implying, the link to the PDF of the article is under References (Uppsala Universitet by Mikael Elinder and Oscar Erixson) with the interview right below that (neither is referenced in the article). Two: The PDF references (in the Selection of Shipwrecks section) about the starting point for their data, Some Notable Shipwrecks Since 1854, the book ends with the year 2006. The list with wh…
/r/MensRights02/02/15 09:28 AM
2

An interview piece! This will be rigorous and well-documented. "Women and Children First," begins in 1852, uses data for 300 years (2012-1852=160 years). So 100 plus disasters, and they only use the data for 18 shipwrecks? No idea what wrecks they are, no explanation for when these wrecks fall in time (before or after the 1852 turning point), no actual numbers, just one person asking leading questions of another? What's going on here? Ah, top of the page says "opinion." What should I have expect…
/r/MensRights02/02/15 08:19 AM
6

The fault of gynocentric morons who cannot see beyond their own needs. So, yes, you're correct.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 07:53 AM
2

Because men were both the crew and the passengers, maybe? Maybe?
/r/MensRights02/02/15 07:44 AM
1

What makes you think you can define a movement that you are not a part of? Is that not literally what you're doing for both MRAs and TRP? Also, for a quick overview of MRA 'stuff' check the sidebar. Finally, I'm so glad you have a circle of feminists that 'allow' men, and some that are Uncle Toms men. Most of the feminists we give a shit about are the ones suggesting things like the Duluth Model and Primary Aggressor Policies, the ones suggesting that shared parenting is a way for children to ge…
/r/MensRights26/01/15 11:11 PM
3

have a penis and muscles Congrats, I'm assuming the transition is going well, you're post op, which is farther than many of my trans friends have gone. They tell me it's difficult, so kudos. The muscles part not so much, but that's because everyone has muscles. I'm willing to bet that most of the MRAs here don't share TERF views on gender on account of things like TERFs being part of what bothers lots of us, so I'm willing to say you get to be part of whatever rights groups you want to be.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 11:14 PM
1

If I knew how to link directly to comments, I would, but I don't so here's the thread. It's this thread I'm down at the bottom with my first comment, and once I ask about if he thinks we're not okay with gay people, is where the apology is.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 03:53 PM
2

I'm sincerely sorry you feel that way and have had experiences to back it up. That's fucked up. Most of the reason that MRAs I know of don't specify that we're pro gay men, or pro black men, or pro trans men is because we assume that's a given. Every man is deserving of the respect that he's earned, just like everyone else. And no class is below respect (likewise no class is automatically afforded respect). I haven't gone around asking because this is already an empathetic, emotionally open grou…
/r/MensRights24/01/15 12:43 AM
3

Do you think that because we don't hang rainbow flags everywhere that we don't? We support gay men on the axis that we have in common. Being a man. Where there are differences, you already have a politically correct, well-funded movement with famous and active faces for it's discussion. Why do you want to co-opt this one?
/r/MensRights23/01/15 04:04 PM
0

According to your paper 26 of 100,000 gay men report a crime against their person, with about 9 of 100,000 reporting against property. Page 4 of [this report](bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv08.pdf) from the Bureau of Justice Statistics contains a table comparing the rates of crime victimization by gender, race, hispanic orgin and age. For men across all categories, our number is 21.3. per 1,000. Multiply by the numbers your study is using (100,000) and we get 21,300 men per 100,000 sufferin…
/r/MensRights23/01/15 03:59 PM
5

Ah, good. So how much of our movement are we allowed to allocate to issues the vast majority of us considers worth correcting? How much overlap should there be?
/r/MensRights23/01/15 03:41 PM
2

If you're banking on gay acceptance for "radical and religious countries (Such as African countries, middle east countries, etc..)," on account of acceptance in the West, may I remind you that several of them still practice the illegal-in-the-West act of Female Genital Mutilation?
/r/MensRights23/01/15 03:38 PM
-4

So suicide facts from 30+ years ago, talking about prevalence of suicide (interesting how your stat only talks about men, so it's still a men's rights issue, even if this is primarily about gay men, so kudos to us as a group anyway), secondly, it's asking about those who attempted or seriously thought about suicide. Nifty fact, when two things that aren't equal (holding a gun to one's head being an attempt, and thinking about holding a gun to one's head being serious thoughts) what is happening …
/r/MensRights23/01/15 03:33 PM
2

So I assume you are coming to badger us because the gay right's movement has been completely co-opted by the minority trans community since they are a smaller percentage and therefore more...I don't know what word you're going for, 'worthy' maybe? group to focus on?
/r/MensRights23/01/15 03:02 PM
6

Attacks on masculinity are common across the spectrum of men, regardless of sexual orientation or gender preference. Straight men are considered to have been insulted by being called gay men if they refuse to show sexual interest in a woman...
/r/MensRights23/01/15 02:55 PM
-2

according to statistics Show me.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 02:52 PM
-9

That's what gay rights are for. The vast majority of men do not want to marry other men. The vast majority of men would like to be able to marry and not have to worry about never seeing their kids again. Lots of us would like to see men be accepted at domestic violence shelters so we can escape abusive wives, girlfriends and others. Several of us want to see laws put into place so that infant boys do not have their genitals ripped apart so vain old women can have 'skin rejuvenating' makeup. That…
/r/MensRights23/01/15 02:38 PM
7

True, but so is skin that wasn't forcibly collected from a non-volunteer patient.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 08:09 PM
2

That may be one of the creepiest headlines I've ever seen.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 06:45 PM
3

Creepy things in Makeup (foreskins is number 4) And from Plasmedic, specifically about Oprah's endorsed choice of circumcision supporters, Skinmedica It is a thing, and a scary one as well.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 05:45 PM
15

Because the tissues removed (fibroblasts) are hella useful for skin cream to do that rejuvenation trick. Remember, baby genitals get removed so vain women will look prettier. PATRIARCHY HURTS MEN TOO!
/r/MensRights22/01/15 05:34 PM
1

You don't want it legal? That's what I care about. As I said before, your feelings (emotions) are irrelevant, so are mine. We share that we believe that this should be illegal. That's enough. Good evening.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 05:32 AM
2

Ah, one of those. This'll be fun. Circumcision is a surgical procedure, as defined by those in the medical practice. It is elective, and rarely medically necessary. It is also done with an aim to 'improve' the appearance of the body part. this is what mostly unnecessary, elective, cosmetic surgery means. An infant is a person, possessing of a body that is not fully developed or matured, with a brain to match. so when I say, "upon bodies which can't consent nor understand," you get that means I'm…
/r/MensRights19/01/15 05:05 AM
9

You mean the collective having of an identifiable opinion within a movement? Because that's what you're complaining about. Does the MRM have an opinion on circumcision? It does, but you don't agree with it, so you accuse it of groupthink when it displays defense of this opinion (especially with regard to your tactics which are on display above). Our not agreeing with you does not constitute censorship or oppression. If you were shadowbanned, that would be something. If you were straight up banne…
/r/MensRights19/01/15 04:29 AM
2

It's as deserving of ridicule as any other opinion that goes, "I approve of mostly unnecessary, elective, cosmetic surgeries performed on bodies that can't consent and don't understand is okay on account of there's a chance that once the person gets old enough to comprehend what happened to them, they might find they prefer it," which is a useful attitude when it comes to justifying slavery (but only on infants). And yes, it is difficult to compare, not gonna lie. But you can have memories to co…
/r/MensRights19/01/15 04:15 AM
11

Every time you post on this subject, it's a tirade about how much you like your flayed genitals, ensure the usage of neutral terminology, and say that legally banning the procedure is banning the choice of parents. Other posters counter with their reasons, which you call emotional and not worthy of consideration (by the way, excellent blind spot to using your personal feelings about your genitals as a positive, while simultaneously dismissing others' arguments as emotional). Or they use terminol…
/r/MensRights19/01/15 03:32 AM
3

Nothing says, "I can think for myself" like adhering to socially enforced conformity about your flayed genitals. Tell me, how much time did you spend experimenting with your intact penis before you had some skin ripped off? I mean, you must be aware of what the physical differences are, because you're happy the way you are, right? That means you're educated about what you've lost and have an informed opinion about instead of rationalizing a decision made on your 'behalf' by people who then spent…
/r/MensRights19/01/15 03:10 AM
5

if the opinions I hold aren't represented I'm going to come back to this. Freedom of parent's choice, freedom of infant representation, freedom for religious choice. Freedom of the parent's choice to get other people to cut open healthy body parts of babies. For those babies to be represented by parents willing to pay people to slice apart body parts. For religious choice to appease the Sky Man (do you support allowing female genital mutilation circumcision for Muslims? If so, why, and if not wh…
/r/MensRights16/01/15 07:13 AM
10

I'm not going to be convinced by a bunch of people all agreeing People who do not have have my opinion will be ignored. Gotcha. issues of freedom, freedom Freedom to permanently cut away the body parts of individuals under your care, who cannot make decisions themselves? Just trying to clarify. debate over the parent's decision, You mean a parent's decision to allow force elective cosmetic surgery on their children. Would you be okay with infant girls getting boob jobs? why the mutilation label …
/r/MensRights15/01/15 11:46 PM
1

Specifically, the one that showed up during the Christmas Open Lines on Honey Badger Radio, here
/r/MensRights12/01/15 03:54 PM
2

So, as a double check: This is not a place to learn about the movement and ideas. (not MRA for beginners) These kind of discussions (obvious feminist troll arrives and kerfluffles, we respond with stats, vids, and talking points) have no use, even when we understand that observers to these discussions are the reason that this sort of debate is necessary in the first place, to generate new MRAs. (still not for beginners) The research on issues MRAs believe in is so simple and easy that everyone c…
/r/MensRights31/12/14 04:30 PM
1

See, this kind of reasoning is super annoying. I'd rather spend a thousand posts explaining something I've done a thousand times, then tell someone to go hunting themselves. Nothing is beyond giving an accounting of itself, and treating it like it is, slowly turns it into something exclusionary and insular.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 02:15 PM
4

You say that you believe that /r/MensRights paints an unrealisticly scary version of the world to it's readers? Are you fucking serious? Ten minutes of Google. Don't fucking tell us that feminism is about gender equality when it has every woman that will listen frothing with fear at every chance. Don't tell us that feminism is beyond our criticism when it won't let us speak. First International Conference on Men's Issues, ever? Fucking Death Threats An academic course about health for men? Lamba…
/r/MensRights31/12/14 07:17 AM
2

Are you the child of a single mother? What is feminism doing to correct the sexism inherent in the Duluth Model of domestic violence? What is feminism doing to reduce the high rate of male suicide? Why is feminism fighting shared parenting as a default of divorce custody settlements? Why is feminism attempting to abolish women's prisons so that dangerously unbalanced individuals are not removed from society? Why is feminism trying to stop any attempts from MRAs to gather, conduct meetings, and h…
/r/MensRights29/12/14 04:47 AM
2

Do you really believe that the average feminist on the street either knows/cares that the ones making policy, laws, and demands of society are misandrists (another word that trips spellcheck)? And do you think the ones with a modicum of power give any fucks about what the useful, deflecting idiots on the bottom think? Even if MRAs do manage to totally infiltrate feminism at a significant level, feminism's power players won't change, and the politics they advocate for will not change. It'll just …
/r/MensRights28/12/14 10:09 PM
8

It's probably safe to assume you didn't call yourself that before, however many of us have. It did not go well. If you stick around (or have been around) you've seen many of the people here getting banned from r/feminism, r/feminismformen, r/AskFeminists, etc for asking for some clarification on what, "Feminism fights for men's issues, too," means and not being happy with, "Patriarchy hurts men too," as an answer. There is also the idea that pervades feminism that men should Shut the Fuck Up, ab…
/r/MensRights28/12/14 12:28 PM
3

Yeah, no hatred or demonization, just that women are men's moral superiors and that by allowing them the vote, women would single-handedly remove corruption and restore the democratic process to where it rightfully belonged. There was also the little issue of the Seneca Falls conference where rich, bored white women tasked themselves with trying to free the slaves while still not giving them the right to vote, and in fact were unable to decide if they wanted to take the risk of having the conscr…
/r/MensRights26/12/14 03:04 PM
2

At number 3, according to COTWA, here: ●California’s new “affirmative consent” law requires "affirmative" consent at each step of a sexual encounter on its college campuses. The co-author of the bill in the state assembly, Bonnie Lowenthal, D-Long Beach, was asked how an innocent person is supposed to prove consent. She said: “Your guess is as good as mine."
/r/MensRights24/12/14 05:30 PM
1

Happy Holidays! Do you believe that fighting against racism is 'enough' to help black men while fighting for men isn't 'enough' to assist the same? Are you aware that things like the sentencing disparity is greater on the men-women axis than on a racial one? Did you know that feminists are trying to stop women from going to prison at all (regardless of race), while not giving one red shit about men? Feminists also do not demonstrably do anything to attempt to solve the problems of high male suic…
/r/MensRights24/12/14 05:27 PM
1

She is a kind and gentle and loving person, who has refused to compromise about you with regards to having children or enjoying your previous living situation. Advice? Freeze up some sperm and get a vasectomy, or go to India and do the trials for Vasalgel. If you fuck with condoms, make sure you are the one with the condom, that you dispose of it, and that she doesn't get any alone time with them. Because, as you may have noticed, she now has a place to live (that you'll keep paying off) and is …
/r/MensRights23/12/14 03:35 PM
31

I read this comment, then I realized that "Misandry" actually being a word was, in fact, progress. I was really happy, then I was really sad.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 02:32 AM
2

So they're essentially mad that this woman, who claims to be feminist, won't close ranks with them? Seems kinda petty.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 06:00 AM
1

So I ask you: as a valuer of truth. When it says, "feminists say" and quotes two three feminists. Is that, in fact, more than one feminist? Could that, in fact, be, a couple? You, as a valuer of truth, will say yes, because that is true. Then you must furthermore concede that yes, using the word feminists (plural of feminist, remember) was correct. The title is not misleading. Especially if you're trying to bandy about "not all feminists." There's three quoted, and once one engages the computer …
/r/MensRights02/12/14 10:20 PM
1

I know, right, especially all those feminists that aren't saying anything about. And the ones pushing the legislation! I mean, what about those feminists that aren't saying, "hold on, this is utter tosh." Don't forget those feminists who are organizing the burden thing where they're asking people to carry around pillows and mattresses to symbolize the 'burden' of having to carry that weight. You remember, right? That the people that are allowing this shit to happen are also feminists? The people…
/r/MensRights02/12/14 07:54 PM
3

I can't believe they're having such trouble with this. It's like when MRAs bring up circumcision. We [MGTOWs] are sad getting your penis mutilated [getting married] happened. We don't blame you for it, likely your parents [you] didn't have full information or got fed bunk by people they [you] trusted. It doesn't mean you have to feel like you were victimized [excluded], but do help be sure this injustice stops happening. Yes, we understand people are allowed to make their decision, especially wh…
/r/MensRights29/11/14 02:11 PM
1

TIL how to avoid a terrible fate. Sometimes, you can't be honest.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 07:24 AM
1

Are you me from a few years ago? Fuck, that's terrifying.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 07:08 AM
1

Why does that matter? If what clothes people are wearing requires critique, then she is just as in dutch as he is. If what a person is wearing is irrelevant, then neither of them is a problem. Pick one.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 05:33 AM
3

True, but the only reason we know about that shirt is because she decided to publish it to Twitter (note, the internet is a bigger audience that any physical location). Secondly, why is the difference significant? Either what you wear matters at all times and needs to be critiqued constantly, or it never matters and everyone needs to shut up. Which are you in favor of?
/r/MensRights18/11/14 05:30 AM
1

the entire men's movement apparently can't be bother to find out the meaning of things feminism talks about a lot constantly. FTFY
/r/MensRights18/11/14 04:13 AM
2

But TRPACC won't ever actually post a useful definition, instead demanding we hunt it down because reasons. Then he/she/it/tentacles gets super pissy when no one cares what he/she/it/tentacles posts about because it's like using institutional sexism as the only definition for sexism. No one else does it, and it's only done in an attempt to shield the person who does it from being wrong.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 02:08 AM
16

Feminism has promoted and continues to promote legislation such as the gendered Violence Against Women Act, Affirmative Consent Act, the Duluth Model, Primary Aggressor Policies, NOW opposing shared parenting, and refuses to allow opposing views to have civil discourse (Warren Farrel's University Talk at Toronto, Doctors Nathanson and Young at University of Toronto, Dr. Fiamengo at Ottowa, and the indescriminate hooting and howling at other talks). Not to mention that whole, "What about the menz…
/r/MensRights16/11/14 03:23 PM
8

If we're being fair, many of us also remember that feminists pushed through VAWA, the Duluth Model, "Primary Aggressor" Policies, that NOW opposes Shared Parenting, the Dear College Letter, the Affirmative Consent law in California, and a few other legal...fuckheaderies. It's more than just Fuckheads making headlines, it's the movers and shakers in the movement really fucking over men. For most of the people here, "feminism" is a poisoned well with good reason. So yes, the idea that anyone consi…
/r/MensRights16/11/14 02:10 AM
0

And nothing of value was lost.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 02:35 PM
2

I'm pretty sure he means it as an Action Opportunity. Can we get a mod on this?
/r/MensRights11/11/14 02:31 PM
10

Wouldn't "made to penetrate," include penetration, though?
/r/MensRights23/10/14 06:26 PM
2

Is it the still jumping to conclusions if I say that about Cracked?
/r/MensRights12/10/14 05:22 AM
0

When the first two words that come up are "A film," then Imma call it that. Secondly, how empathetic are you to ISIS? Al-Qaeda? Boko Haram? After all, they are just a group of clearly disturbed people, nothing more. Right? Besides, my point was that I wanted a source for your bullshit claim of "that about 90% stopped being racist after lots of gay/non-white people were very kind to them." You posted a feel-good, social 'experiment' about a group of people hunting for their agenda, that had no ac…
/r/MensRights12/10/14 05:18 AM
1

Your source is a film? Well in that case, please, allow me to demonstrate my evidence of how World War II actually went down with the incredible "Inglourious Basterds." Followed up with an spectacular treatise on the effects of overexposure to radiation displayed in "The Incredible Hulk." And finally, the existence of remarkably humanoid aliens as evidenced in the recent summer blockbuster/peer reviewed journal, "Guardians of the Galaxy." When we ask for a source, please have something significa…
/r/MensRights12/10/14 04:33 AM
15

Damn. Usually it's TedX. It's infiltrated higher. Again.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 04:13 AM
1

All the findings show Source please?
/r/MensRights12/10/14 04:11 AM
1

An article demonstrating that as far back as Ancient Greece (and more pronounced in Medieval times) that male subservience to women was normal and expected. It also connected it to HeForShe and the UN response that it is somehow a 'new' idea for men to bend the knee, showing that its just good 'ol gynocentrism at work. tl;dr. It is pointing out the old status quo and telling how old it is.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 08:51 PM
0

So one post makes him an MRA? I'm glad we have people like you, the disagree-er to distinguish what does or does not make an MRA. And again, since you are preemptively asking a question none of us cared to make in the first place, why should we care a second time? We don't like feminism, which is a fairly popular movement, obviously number of voices isn't our main concern (theirs is bigger than ours, you see). And hey, nothing whets the appetite like false modesty, because we need so much extra …
/r/MensRights28/09/14 06:37 AM
5

I would love to give you more upvotes, instead, I'll throw this into the face of every feminist who takes umbridge at the sexual double standard. This is damn near better than "locks and keys."
/r/MensRights18/09/14 05:36 AM
3

play the game Fuck your game. I'm not here so I can listen to people tell me to fuck off because I'm not worth being chased because, "it's the old way." We're here, specifically, because the old way needs to die, not to propagate it. You want to bitch about us being mad that women won't chase? Fine, but don't expect us to give a fuck. In this way, you have decided that traditionalism was correct, and for that, ballsack, you ain't worth it. Am I a part of this hoping to get laid by ladies out to …
/r/MensRights16/09/14 10:58 PM
1

has a point about the whole sexist thing flack from some faggots I'm not sure what to say, you've baffled me quite soundly. Also, if you'd care to check, her "points" are made up of mostly bullshit. Thunderfoot does an excellent job of breaking it down. This particular video covers her hack job of Hitman: Absolution. Anita Sarkeesian - Busted!
/r/MensRights16/09/14 06:13 AM
0

Good luck finding stats! It seems pretty sound, especially when one understands the combination with the (is it still 80%) National Spending choices made by women.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 12:40 PM
2

Yes. I'd have a problem is anyone slapped the Doctor to change his mind. He's the Doctor. You don't slap the person responsible for saving you, unless they're babbling incoherently and need to focus. And even then, the first words out of your mouth better be, "Sorry, but you were rambling and we're on a time limit."
/r/MensRights01/09/14 03:11 PM
2

I can only imagine that /r/Feminism will give a warm and receptive welcome to your questions and critiques about male genital mutilation or falling male attendance at colleges, or about male rejection of parental financial liability. I (and I'm sure, many others) would love to see an np link after it goes up. But wait a couple of hours, my lunch break is about up, and I'd like a chance to screenshot it before it gets deleted.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 05:48 PM
3

"of"
/r/MensRights22/08/14 05:50 PM
1

So when the women who are aborting or abandoning their potential children are getting in line, would you support a law that requires they notify the potential father? You know, for his psychological well-being?
/r/MensRights21/08/14 05:47 PM
1

Except that a conviction carries a felony charge (which makes one ineligible to vote).
/r/MensRights14/08/14 07:17 AM
3

That is an excellent point. It needs to enter my rotation.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 09:28 AM
12

As far as the wage gap, it has been shown many, many, many, many times that the moment anything is controlled for, it decreases sharply, and when you look at overtime worked, or don't look at bonuses (you know, those things that individuals get on account of doing well at their jobs, not on account of gender), or look at included benefits, or look at the jobs split by field, you find that the gap disappears. Here's some sources because I know you'll just complain unless I provide some: https://w…
/r/MensRights04/08/14 09:38 PM
12

Except that that particular issue was codified into law as part of the "Tender Years Doctrine," which was feminist dogma written up by Caroline Norton (British Feminist) who was able to work with politicians at the time and turned it into the Custody of Infants Act of 1839. It basically stats that since the mother was the parent taking kids to school, doctors, and other activities (because in 1839 a husband was working all the live long day, and the wife may not have been, especially if she were…
/r/MensRights04/08/14 09:28 PM
3

Your idea to rectify a problem, is to take away a person's means to enact the problem? Should we also take away roof-access doors and windows on high stories? No cars? No knives, pills, offensive words, alcohol or other methods of self-ending? Or should we maybe deal with the actual depression? Tom Golden and Dr. Tara Palmatier currently work with and for men in that area. (We don't have national pushes for this on account of not receiving national funding. Makes it tough, you realize.) Your sug…
/r/MensRights04/08/14 09:20 PM
6

Your proof that Patriarchy is a legitimate theory is that a group of people driven ideologically have written research that supports that ideology? So when McDonalds makes the claim that their food is completely acceptable for a healthy diet, you believe it wholeheartedly? Please forgive the MRM for not having shovelfulls of research, but the one time we did try to have an academic offering that may have potentially not had a feminist lens, it got shut right the fuck down. http://www.avoiceforme…
/r/MensRights04/08/14 09:10 PM
7

I'm not quite sure why you think gun control is either a useful or essential part of the MRM. Convince me.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 08:28 PM
1

You aren't well-mannered or civil for saying, "Perhaps some compromise needs to be made on account of those that want to suck the blood from a mutilated baby's genitals." You aren't progressive or morally superior by suggesting that baby boys' rights should be subordinate to ancient rites and rituals that are haphazardly chosen to be embraced or forgotten based on convenience. You aren't a friend worth having if your support for human rights is so ineffectual that an old book will stop you. Afte…
/r/MensRights04/08/14 10:33 AM
2

Because clearly, hiding behind barbarous practices as "religious" allows them to bypass the cutting up of children too young to have any idea of what's going on. That's why Anti Islam Sentiments (attacks on another religion) are the preventative force for making it so that Female Circumcision is legal and allowed in the world. Oh wait... It's not. You disingenuous shit. You want to hide behind religion as a shield for your savage and sickening practices, but refuse to advocate for what the other…
/r/MensRights04/08/14 07:04 AM
5

Hey OP, I found your other throwaway.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 03:29 AM
2

I did see it earlier, so I'm pretty sure he is now.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 09:17 PM
1

worthwhile endeavour in life feminism Welp, time to laugh until I can't laughs no more.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 04:49 PM
1

That's weird, because when hurt feelings come up on the other side of the gender divide, it apparently shows the root cause of legitimate issues, combined with expressions of outrage at oppression. We already know we don't want to be subject to an elaborate treatise in how we want to own and control women, we just want some sympathy. However, according to feminism, men have such a space, it's everywhere that isn't a women's space. Bullshit, we know, but the dominant narrative nonetheless. Beside…
/r/MensRights21/07/14 12:26 PM
8

If you can't find your own point, then I guess you get to stop.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 12:30 PM
4

Monsanto is about improving our food's quality. That's it. It's that simple. Wal-Mart is about providing quality goods at affordable prices. That's it. It's that simple.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 12:58 PM
0

Holy shit, I don't know how or why, but the MRA supportive comments are HUGE on the website. Hell, mostly all I do here is rip apart stupid people, but there is so much MRA love over there I have nothing to say, kudos to Dean and everybody else giving that hit piece what for!
/r/MensRights02/07/14 12:34 AM
2

Ah, not being forced to pay on dates, I guess that makes up for VAWA, the Duluth Model, the Dear Colleague Letter, "All men are rapists," #killallmen, and "poisonous M&Ms." I'll contact the rest of the MRA and let them know we've been had. Before feminism, my boyfriend would just make a decision regardless if I liked it or not. [Feminism] helped my boyfriend because he gets to have a relationship with an equal, not a dependent. This isn't feminism helping your boyfriend, it's feminism helping yo…
/r/MensRights01/07/14 01:30 AM
3

From your PDF, you lying, ignorant, misandric, EXPLETIVE DELETED. Page Fucking 4 (4 of the PDF, 2 of the study). The ORIGIN of Predominant Aggresor Policies. Beginning in the mid 1980s states began to enact mandatory arrest laws for domestic violence. Knowing that at least half of all cases of partner aggression are mutual, these policies triggered sharp increases in the number of arrests of men and women. In California, mandatory arrest policies caused the number of arrests of en to increase by…
/r/MensRights01/07/14 12:55 AM
2

Hot damn, that's some mighty fine anecdote you got there, care to show a source? I must also comment on your list of predominant aggressor traits. From the website: The seriousness of injuries received by each party. The height and weight of the parties Which party has the potential to seriously injure the other party Whether a party has a fearful demeanor Whether a party has a controlling demeanor Which of these points to a female abuser again? Especially when feminists love to claim that since…
/r/MensRights30/06/14 01:19 PM
3

The see stuff everywhere was actually directed at the person you were replying to. Secondly, the Duluth Model posits that female perpetrators do not exit. This, combined with the Mandatory Arrest policies (to counter your immediate claim, Mandatory Arrest programs are in 23 states. These ones: http://www.nij.gov/publications/dv-dual-arrest-222679/exhibits/Pages/table1.aspx), and Predominant Aggressor Laws (Hey, there's a handy chart on AVFM: http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/government-tyrann…
/r/MensRights30/06/14 07:16 AM
6

This has got to be an epidemic, you just see it everywhere. Your anecdotes are irrelevant. Also, just so you know, it started in Duluth, Minnesota, what it's named after. And from the textbook Men and Masculinities by Michael Kimmel and Amy Aronson, page 65 it mentions that there are 37 states subject to the Duluth Model and programs like it. Mind you, this was back in 2004, likely the numbers have changed somewhat. And again, anecdotes are not evidence, they are anecdotes, which are not things …
/r/MensRights30/06/14 06:28 AM
2

Life Experience you say? Here's my turning point into MRA. ET is me, and FF is my Feminist Friend. FF Text on an image: Feminazi? Little boy, let me give you a 20% pay cut and regulate your sperm and see if you get a little militant. ET Sweet, how about 90% of the people who die at work are your gender and you get no say about the possibility of having a child? FF I think condoms are a pretty effective 'say' in whether or not a child is conceived, and a man has never had to worry about giving bi…
/r/MensRights30/06/14 06:14 AM
6

Do you know what the biggest limiting factor in the size of a society is? The number of uteri. No woman can be pregnant with too many children at once (I believe that Octomom's 8 is the record), whereas a man can impregnate many women. Therefore, having more women makes a society more populous, more able to manipulate the land and more successful. The idea that a man is a dime a dozen isn't new, it isn't uncommon, and it isn't mine, but keep dreaming. Go ahead and ignore the shit out of metaphor…
/r/MensRights30/06/14 05:47 AM
11

First point: Your personal anecdotes, lived experience, feelings, individual observations, etc. are meaningless. You know that. You have brought up that point several times. Laws cannot be based on feelings. They need to be quantifiable, otherwise enforcement goes haywire and it becomes impossible to tell what actually happened or what needs to happen. You are aware of this, otherwise you wouldn't comment that you know it's pointless to bring emotional arguments into this. Second point: Your int…
/r/MensRights30/06/14 04:34 AM
2

This seems less 'men's rights' and more, MGTOW lite. I don't usually get all over the men's rights distinction and label, but this isn't men's rights literature. There's alpha and beta everywhere, there's a couple of paragraphs about how to change oneself to be more appealing to women. That's not men's rights. That's not the difficulty of our struggle against an ideology that actively hates us. It's not about improvement of society to the point where men can share their difficulties and issues w…
/r/MensRights29/06/14 10:40 AM
7

We reinforce patriarchy by suggesting that men can be victims? By saying that there are too many men blowing their own brains out? By believing that all men should have intact genitals until that particular individual says otherwise? For a shadowy cabal of all powerful, societal manipulating, woman and minority despising, Straight White Males, patriarchy seems to have cocked up pretty fucking badly when it comes to the whole, "Men get to do the screwing, not the getting screwed" bit. What in you…
/r/MensRights29/06/14 09:27 AM
1

We're Americans. We totally can, but like everything else, it's usually in poor taste.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 02:48 PM
6

No, not only are you wrong, but stupidly wrong. JURIES decide whether or not a person is guilty. Judges pass sentence. I also like how you ignore the other, slightly more pressing concerns, to harp on the guy who is acting most like a tinfoil hat. Concerns like, where's her police report? If the 'cops won't believe' why post online? Why no stop to a hospital? Why no response like anyone else who has been attacked? Or are you too busy trying to find a judge to declare me guilty of something?
/r/MensRights28/06/14 12:04 AM
4

Congratulations, it's a brand new troll account! I hope you're a proud parent!
/r/MensRights27/06/14 11:51 PM
8

ok seriously i appreciate your time. but i think you're oversimplifying things that are never as clear cut as we'd like them to be. It's astonishing how the feminist position becomes nuanced and complex and impossible to break down just seconds after someone literally breaks down their statements and shatters them. Absolutely incredible. It's enough to take your suspension of disbelief away.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 01:55 PM
3

I wouldn't say "Just as likely to find" on the lower rungs. That implies that roughly half of men are in power positions. For each CEO, you probably find between 5 and 10 men in the lower spots. Just my pair of pennies.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 01:40 PM
0

Getting Brigaded? Can anyone else taste the sarcasm of jpflathead?
/r/MensRights16/06/14 11:06 PM
1

I'm worried that you think men should be happy with their sole reproductive choices being condoms, vasectomy, or abstinence while women are currently railing about possibly having to spend their own money securing an abortion (you know, being mad about having their reproductive freedom limited in any way, shape or form), while ignoring that literally every state has Safe Haven laws. Or that women have the pill. Or diaphrams. Or birth control injections. Or the female condom. Or IUDs. Or the birt…
/r/MensRights16/06/14 09:52 PM
1

Feelings are irrelevant to any debate. If you see "fears men I don't already know" as not paranoia, then there are problems. Serious, therapy requiring problems. If you think fearing all men isn't just a more subversive way to hate them, you may require more introspection. There isn't violence here, no one suggests it (without being universally condemned), no one endorses it (without the same) and no one implements it (check out the coverage of Danielle D'entremont for how we respond to a (theor…
/r/MensRights16/06/14 09:43 PM
4

We are under no obligation to respect your fear. You are under no obligation to suffer it. I'm sorry you hate us so badly that you can't have functional relationships with half the human race. That is not our problem. Furthermore, I posit that you haven't really heard or read anything about us, the movement, our causes, or anything tangentially related to what we're trying to do. Mainly because you found a reason to dismiss us on account of we don't care about how you feel. And we shouldn't, esp…
/r/MensRights16/06/14 06:49 PM
1

I suppose feminism has the moral high ground what with all the banning of people they don't like, then deleting the replies, then deleting the threads. Or do they have special rules?
/r/MensRights15/06/14 02:35 PM
1

This bullshit again. Go find some people who are actually damaged to make a case to. You are not welcome here.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 02:30 PM
2

Men do get molested, Men do get raped, Men do get objectified, but mainly it comes from other Men. Disregarding how wrong this statement is, the question must be asked; is victimization only valid if it comes from the opposite sex? Do Men get the shaft in divorce proceedings? Many Times, So you acknowledge that there is a distinct disadvantage to men in family court, that exists, but is unaccounted for statistically? Which you further justify by... claiming irresponsibility, on the part of (all)…
/r/MensRights15/06/14 10:34 AM
8

It wasn't until I watched that I thought this was a male, either.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 05:22 PM
2

Which is different from feminists how? Why is it that when it comes to the wage gap, women can't choose what jobs to go into for themselves, but for workplace injury, men have a choice? Are you this disingenuous by nature, or did you learn it?
/r/MensRights13/06/14 02:24 AM
1

Now the Badgers don't get to answer it. Thanks. But seriously, thank you.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 09:24 PM
1

Back then, I literally didn't know better. Now I do. I'm not going to go back there just to open up old wounds. But I would like to point out how she's also being a bigot, but not lose my entire social circle.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 08:16 PM
1

Dear Honey Badgers, I have a feminist friend. I didn't recognize her as a feminist during college, mainly because I didn't realize that there was a separate narrative. This feminist eventually pushed me into educating myself, and therefore, finding my way to Men's Rights, Karen, r/Mensrights, and other MRA places. Recently, there was a facebook exchange about one feminist overhearing two girls complaining about how feminism is just about spewing hate. Internally, I cheered. Then the feminist tha…
/r/MensRights12/06/14 06:39 PM
1

In response, Second.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 03:56 AM
1

Just a run and gun? Not even enough stones to defend this rubbish? You show up, post an article we're already aware of (and already dissected as bullshit) and try to preach that we're wrong. Name me three feminist initiatives that have been exclusively about helping men. Not, "Men benefit as a side effect." Not, "We'll get to that." Not, "Well, we're working on this issue that's like that." Three. That are about men. Then maybe I'll give a shit.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 10:29 PM
1

Welp, this has reached hilarity critical mass. Now to see how long until my guy stops aching.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 09:13 PM
1

Did this through AVFM. Glad to see Manosphere United. (Sounds like a football team)
/r/MensRights10/06/14 12:28 AM
3

Shit, that would have been excellent to go to, get notes on, and report back with. Dang it, we missed some prime espionage time there. Now, I a little mad.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 11:49 PM
3

You know there's an edit button, right? Everyone seems to think the Nazis just showed up in Germany in the 30s and started hauling Jews in off the streets and into ovens. It was a process. It started with propaganda to dehumanize Jews (Don't be that Guy posters, teach men not to rape, men's help for DV is anger management phone lines), then removal of rights (no due process for college rape accusations, no right of anonymity for other rape cases, no right to choose parenthood), then came ghettos…
/r/MensRights09/06/14 12:09 AM
4

Men's rights is totally worthwhile, but only if you ally with the people who are silencing you! Listen to me! I will save the movement by fully submitting to feminism! Because feminism made such a huge push to solve men's issues! They really will get to it! They promise! Just a little longer, guys!
/r/MensRights08/06/14 11:56 PM
1

Look, the concern troll is back! Everyone, listen to him this time because he's totally here for legitimate reasons this time! Nothing shady here from the brand new account that attempted to tell us off before!
/r/MensRights08/06/14 11:52 PM
2

Of course not, there are laws against that. Unless the cudgel is slimmer than my thumb.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 11:43 PM
2

Let me get this straight. You ask me to consider that EVERY single time someone sympathetic to men's issues tries to talk, some well-meaning feminist just shows up to protest? Or that some other well-meaning feminist just pulls the fire alarm, to fucking cheers, and that this somehow isn't indicative of the movement as a whole? The protests (composing of, you know, fucking DEATH THREATS, et al) against the First International Men's Conference are all helped up by a 'vocal minority' in feminism? …
/r/MensRights08/06/14 11:36 PM
5

Brand new account running a tone argument? Better treat it like a serious question and not a troll. /s
/r/MensRights08/06/14 09:39 PM
8

How much you wanna bet that "mental illness" is a respectable reason for her shooting? Note: I am not deriding mental illness, or those who suffer from it, I am pointing out that it is being used to excuse actions for one group, while a forced agenda is being used for the other.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 08:33 AM
12

As expected, on the MRA side, the first blow I land in defiance of Feminism. If you can kill the "Patriarchy" and the idea of "Rape Culture," which, depending on the immaterialness of their definitions, is laughably easy to do or goddamn impossible, it would go a long way to making men not feel attacked by feminists. Second, maybe calling out the haters, cleaning up the movement. Valerie Solanis wrote the S.C.U.M. Manifesto, then shot three men and attempted to kill Andy Warhol. Maybe some admit…
/r/MensRights08/06/14 06:31 AM
1

A Voice For Men has a few. They aren't advice animal style, but they're fairly sharp and to the point. Here's a link: http://www.avoiceformen.com/?s=meme
/r/MensRights08/06/14 06:07 AM
1

I'm not. I'm pointing out where you're wrong. If you want me to stop, be less wrong.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 12:45 AM
1

Didn't Goodfella already do this? He did appear to: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CF4SHXsFE-s&list=UUBVYmXSIzHq_gXMZpsfd9kg
/r/MensRights07/06/14 10:16 AM
2

I, for one, would love to hear some examples, Nigtig. That would be great. Some examples of men oppressing women. Ones that haven't been disproven multiple times. Ones that aren't actually women being shitty to themselves that feminists won't discuss. Ones that occur in significant enough numbers to be measured and meaningful. Ones that don't rely on inflated or outdated or mischaracterized statistics. I understand this might take awhile. Forgive me if I don't hold my breath.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 07:20 PM
1

He seems to make a huge ado about how rich, old guys manage to 'get' young, attractive women. Does he understand that these women have the choice? No one is forcing these women to date these old, rich men. Just like no one is forcing young, attractive men to date rich, old women. And surprise of surprises, old, rich women do have kept men. It does exist and it does happen. Hell, Sam Axe's character on Burn Notice is one of those men several times (not that Bruce Campbell is as young as he once w…
/r/MensRights06/06/14 06:57 PM
1

It's copypasta guys, nothing new. Likely not even a woman posting, much less one so full of rage. Is 4chan really the level of expected dialog?
/r/MensRights06/06/14 05:45 PM
2

An interesting theory. I don't have the schooling to be able to critique it more throughly, but it has been made to explain the facts, it presents a reasoned and logical look at how (at the very least) these two movements interact, and presents a solution. I like it and would love more discussion like it.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 10:44 PM
6

I did not think about that. That makes it instantly funnier. 2 levels of horrible depravity for the price of one!
/r/MensRights05/06/14 10:27 PM
2

That's a pretty high percentage that likes that marriage business. I suppose they have it as a goal, but are afraid to get one on account of the... persuasive legal arguments.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 07:53 PM
1

R.I.P. Cracked. You were a pretty funny site and did some awesome things, like the after hours skits. It took a long time for me to realize when things started going wrong. The first big, red flag I had was when Winston Rowantree had a couple of articles about how hard it was for him to deal with people that didn't agree with him. It tanked from there. I'd pour some libations, but I don't know what would work well. You weren't classic enough for whiskey, nor thug enough for a 40. I think I may h…
/r/MensRights04/06/14 09:34 AM
1

Unexpected. Thanks, Frank.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 06:25 PM
10

as it's presented in academia That's the difference. Anything presented in academia gets warped when you bring it into the real world. Turns out, a mental realm of ideals is not the best place for birthing a movement. They tend to ignore that ugly reality bit.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 05:51 PM
-4

I'm sorry, I don't speak shill.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 05:47 PM
3

Fight Club maybe? Did you know the reference?
/r/MensRights02/06/14 05:40 PM
8

I'm glad you are making a point we agree with, namely, that fathers are important and should be a part of children's lives. But then you attach it to this bullshit flying by about how 'financial abortion' somehow detracts from that. Unless you are woefully and willfully ignorant at how the system currently works, there is no overlap. However, since at least one of those two (woefully or willfully) is true, allow me to explain. The current system allows for women to have a child which she can for…
/r/MensRights02/06/14 05:38 PM
3

Does anyone actually understand this? Or is this some sort of cleverbot that got a virus?
/r/MensRights01/06/14 06:09 AM
1

Nice to meet you cowgod, I can only hope the Diablo II runs didn't wreck your place. Welcome to the movement.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 07:22 AM
4

Mr. Rogers was a man of such inspiring purity that he managed to get the COTUS (Congress of the United States) to give public television more funding so it could continue.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 07:12 AM
1

Why should I or anyone hang around here? Because you support the idea? Because you think men are getting a short stick that feminism isn't helping with? Because people here won't immediately ridicule you for not stepping into line and will at least make an effort? Because here you won't get shouted down? Because here is a group of people that won't tell you to shut up and sit back and be the root of all evil and cause of all problems. Pick one, pick any, pick none. What you choose is your choice…
/r/MensRights30/05/14 03:34 AM
1

You all heard it here, the previous poster's rant is allowed to be sexist, because I proved that if you swap the gender for race, it's racist. Care to perform other mental gymnastics? Like demonstrating you need feminism because people ask why you need feminism?
/r/MensRights30/05/14 03:17 AM
3

Depends on the state. Many states (such as the one I'm in) allow for recording of the conversation as long as one party agrees. I'd double check for your state, OP.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 07:32 PM
2

As far as knowing about those job's paychecks and relative benefits, I know that I was looking at roughnecking for a while, and while it pays great, it's hours suck and I would have to sacrifice my life for the job. Didn't wanna do that. Others of that category, I don't know. And, if we're comparing sourced claims, any chance you can find the amount of women looking to jump into dark holes where it's hard to breathe (mining)? As an example, maybe. And while I don't have express stats for college…
/r/MensRights29/05/14 07:06 PM
2

So you're saying that girls don't have minds of their own to fight back? You're saying that women would love to spend more of their time suffering from mine collapses, cutting off their hands in forests, getting covered in oil, and possibly having their extremities smashed by incredibly heavy machines; except that darn patriarchy won't let them? Oh dear. And I suppose that my suffering from worse college debt and greater insurance payments means that I must elect to have a higher work/life balan…
/r/MensRights29/05/14 05:29 PM
5

We are under no obligation to respect your fear. Just like you are under no obligation to suffer it.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 05:17 PM
31

I personally tried talking in the feminism subreddits? No. But every couple of days there's another thread up about how, "I was having a civil conversation in /r/feminism and then got banned." I usually don't go into those threads, but I might start. I'd suggest them to you as well.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 04:51 PM
2

I wish I had your optimism with regards to truth. Lots of people rotting in prison probably feel otherwise, though. More interestingly, you're okay with calling this 'criticism.' I'm not quite sure how 'illegitimate criticism' can actually be a thing. Especially when it's not directed toward the group for their improvement, but to the public for their consumption. If only we had a term for statements directed to the public about a group of people, sculpted to discredit and make that group look b…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 08:09 AM
1

Our minds? No, but we already live here. We know it's bullshit, however, many people reading that article don't. Hell, I didn't back when I read it the first time. Or the second. Now that I'm here, I know what's fucked up with it, but if it wasn't for my 'wake-up-moment' I wouldn't be here to know better. So yeah, we know MRA isn't synonymous with "Misogynist douchebag," we are also in the unfortunate minority in that count. But yeah, let's just let this one go by, too. No need to defend ourselv…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 06:07 AM
15

I identify as a radical moderate. Excellent, I identify as a Native Alien. /s I'm glad you define your feminism post haste. Alas, the feminism I'm used to is not as, 'limited' as your definition. The feminism I and many others here are used to is the feminism that claims it's, "working on men's problems, too." And that there is no need for a men's rights movement, and one that tries to silence any gatherings for the discussions of the issues of men and boys. Honestly, I wouldn't mind if feminism…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 05:47 AM
1

Weird, because there is such a box under gender. Also race, religion, political party. Hell, there's a box marked other all over the place.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 06:28 AM
2

The MRM (Men's Rights Movement) has been active for over a century, depending on the form. It rebelled against the ridiculous early alimony (still an issue) as the New York Alimony Club in 1890. The only knee-jerk is that there is this huge thingy called the internet to let us get together. We were never institutionalized (like feminism), we weren't really together until the internet let us know that there was another way. Besides, other than here and some seriously troubled places (and even her…
/r/MensRights26/05/14 06:26 AM
2

When the first thing we bring up about Feminist is countered by NAFALT (Not All Feminists Are Like That), we get a little goddamn tired about how it's suddenly a feminist term turned sideways, and to be insulted as a response. It's like building a tower, only to have some fucker on a cliff above you build a hut and claim to have a better view. Feminism is institutionalized. Feminism says "We live in a Patriarchy," while the President has been hugely sympathetic to the feminist cause, creating an…
/r/MensRights26/05/14 05:54 AM
3

Not backtracking? Your first post was about how "straight white men" get their feelings hurt and how it apparently doesn't amount to anything because they don't get hurt for that (ignore plz the white kid that got beaten to death for being in a black neighborhood or the several who are beaten or die because of a false accusation (for whom the only factors of their death are; he has a penis and, "she said he hurt her")). Your immediate flop into "legitimate issues" that require, "open and honest …
/r/MensRights26/05/14 04:13 AM
4

I like the backtracking from 'oh, your feelings get hurt, I guess that means something now' to, "legitimate issues that need to be discussed." It reeks of goal-post moving and, 'huh, maybe I crossed a line and couldn't possibly defend what I said, better do some damage control.' And just because Hitler ended with the Holocaust, doesn't mean that was the first step. It starts with belittling the humanity of your chosen 'unclean group.' That's why when the feelings of, "straight white men," (nice …
/r/MensRights26/05/14 02:39 AM
2

That's not true, feminism is about the pursuit of equal rights, not diminishing upon men's rights. False. There have been several pursuits regarding the alteration of evidence standards for campus rape from "shadow of a doubt," to "preponderance of evidence." Which is literally stripping away men's legal rights. rational feminists who just want men and women to be treated the same. False. There is no feminist initiative to force female police officers, firefighters, or soldiers to meet or exceed…
/r/MensRights26/05/14 01:47 AM
1

Me? Nope. I've got the women that abuse me. Mostly emotionally, I'll admit, but I also know that that person isn't all women. Just like I know that being around people who have suffered like I suffered means I'm not alone, that others have also had this thing happen to them. And more than that feeling, that people are fundamentally good and will help those in need, that we can unite as a species against the cruelty in our souls and become greater than we are. A pocket of misery can exist, surrou…
/r/MensRights26/05/14 01:15 AM
0

Are they so incapable they can't distinguish other men from their husband? Holy shit, I know it's hard to tell people from a race you aren't a part of apart, but an entire gender? I know the difference between my mom and random other lady. Even my sister, who (because of how genetics works) looks a lot like her. I guess what is being said is, "Life sucks. Quit projecting." We're not all your abuser, we don't deserve to get treated like it.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 08:33 PM
-1

How to prove that people are bigoted in one easy step. As a white bodied person speaking from my experience with abuse. Shelters providing a space for the people who have been abused to feel safe again is very important. Regardless of how much I tried it wasn't until many years after the experience of sexual assault that i realized I was uncomfortable around black bodied persons and projecting that discomfort onto every black bodied person in my life. This touches on all sorts of issues related …
/r/MensRights25/05/14 08:29 PM
1

If it makes you feel better, I'll just wear a yellow star. That way you can still identify us on sight, mkay?
/r/MensRights25/05/14 01:16 PM
21

That is all that is being asked of you. No. It isn't. What is being demanded of us is a uniformity that is denied to all other groups. "All men are rapists." "All men beat their wives." "All men are always available for sex." The narrative is that all men are a part of this. With the sole and not particularly notable exception of men that agree with the person wielding the huge brush that's painting everyone else. Being quiet? Never. No one hears a problem that isn't talked about. A silent suffe…
/r/MensRights25/05/14 06:36 AM
5

I know, right? Because his only point was that men give a shit about what women want. That's the whole point of this rant, isn't it? Not that a commercial shows blatant groping and sexual objectification of men. Not that this would get the promoting company crucified in the media if a bunch of men groped women for the purposes of finding the perfect lingerie. Not even that we're just allowing it to happen when the reverse would get shot down in the board room. None of those is what he's saying. …
/r/MensRights23/05/14 07:48 AM
2

On a board that isn't ours? If you're looking for misrepresentation, I guess that 'logic' works.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 12:57 PM
1

This is a joke. The first line is (fairly) inoffensive, with a followup of, "Yep, that's how that stereotype works."
/r/MensRights21/05/14 11:07 AM
1

This is a joke in the same way that stabbing someone is a joke. Not funny and actively painful. There are people who come to this sub with a mind almost open, who are looking for reasons to ignore it. This is not only fuel, but blatantly so. It doesn't matter that the first thing you see if you click on it is, "It's all a joke guys!" Because after seeing the title, no one wants to click to check. It's like seeing someone vomit and being told that it's okay because it's performance art. We don' h…
/r/MensRights21/05/14 11:06 AM
2

Somebody seems to want to get this on the front page for something... Downvoted and ignored.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 06:08 AM
1

Appeasement is a poor way to handle situations. I recall it going badly for Europe some time ago.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 05:26 AM
4

Wait, wait, so homosexuals are covered in swirls of cinnamon sugar? What the hell else did my Sex Ed. class miss?
/r/MensRights16/05/14 01:15 PM
1

Thanks much!
/r/MensRights10/05/14 11:42 PM
2

For a completely new (literally first post) redditor and budding MRA, what is a RES, and how do I load that into it? Edit: HA HA, thank you google and other internet entities. As I understand it, it just shows how many posts the person made in r/SRS and r/SRSsucks?
/r/MensRights10/05/14 11:13 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter