TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

EngineerWorth2490 Archive

View 0 posts and 15 comments by EngineerWorth2490 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

I think in the advert it’s about the fact that she’s hugging the dude whose ass she’s supposed to be beating. Not very common to go into a long embrace with your sparring partner. I think you’re reading waaaayyy to far into this. If this was just some random chick groping a guy on the street….yeah, that would be nonconsensual contact. But given that the as features a contact sport, the contact here is awkward, but not overtly sexual in nature. If the guy didn’t want to have contact, or with that…
/r/MensRights16/09/24 01:54 PM
1

It sounds really sad that I believe my partner is entitled to her own personal privacy and that my partner also respect mine? lol yeah, guess I’ll die alone if I’m not Facebook/iPhone stalking my romantic partner/spouse and keep tabs on her all the time…💩 Clearly, you don’t quite understand the big picture when it comes to adult relationships. If you’re worried about what your partner is doing, you’ve failed to establish trust, or you’re doing some shady shit and expect it of your partner. That’…
/r/MensRights30/04/24 07:42 AM
-19

Why’s anyone going through someone else’s phone. That’s my question. If you’re that insecure about your relationship you need to worry what’s on the phone, there are prob bigger issues in the relationship. Someone’s phone is like their most private space these days. It’s where we all Google the stupid shit we’re too afraid to ask out loud. Sharing passwords, letting a partner get into your phone…that’s a big no from me. And if someone has a problem with what’s on my phone, I’m not about to go th…
/r/MensRights16/04/24 07:21 AM
2

What is MGTOW? I’ve heard it…drawing a blank though… To OP; “why don’t people go out and research things they’re “apparently so invested in?” → because most people are emotionally sensitive idiots. The internet has propped up all sorts of supposed “authorities” on topics, and thanks to the existence of widespread confirmation bias, the lack of computer education and internet based research skills taught to the majority of average janes & joes who now have their voices capable of being amplified …
/r/MensRights30/05/23 09:55 PM
1

I believe in equal rights. Equality all around. I don’t use tik tok, so I don’t have a frame of reference for what you’re specifically referring to. I don’t cheat and I don’t tolerate cheating. I am keenly aware and fully realize cheating has been normalized especially in patriarchal families where the father is a cheater. My father nor am I proponents of that system. Furthermore, I treat my romantic relationships with women like I do with any other human being. I practice respect, loyalty, open…
/r/MensRights15/01/23 03:06 AM
0

In the shows; I think for the most part, they are meant to show the ridiculousness of those schools of thought. I haven’t ever interpreted those projections to be malicious. In modern family; specifically (most recent familiarity) I think the writers are attempting to show the juxtaposition between what many view as feminism in the “modern” setting within a “family” atmosphere and show how modern “family” women buy too much into and normalize extremes in the feminist movement when it is totally …
/r/MensRights22/12/22 06:13 PM
3

This is a form of radical feminism. Warped radical feminism lives on the eye for an eye extreme that because some other man treated a woman this way once, all men must suffer—even the good men. It’s toxic feminism like this that fuels inequality. If feminism is really about equality; why does this branch of “feminism” still exist? It’s not feminism, it’s bigotry—misandry at best.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 06:03 PM
1

Right on
/r/MensRights21/12/22 09:31 PM
2

Thanks
/r/MensRights20/12/22 09:16 PM
4

Hard to read an article I don’t have a job to pay for
/r/MensRights20/12/22 06:44 AM
2

I’m not even going to read more than the first couple of sentences. People don’t want to talk more about Ukraine than Iran because there are more white people; they want to talk about Ukraine because it contributes more significantly towards global inflation and Putin has been threatening the use of nukes which could mean global intervention and all out war. Jessica Chastain needs to lay off the Margaritas and become educated in geopolitics and globalization before opening her mouth….the world p…
/r/MensRights15/12/22 01:50 AM
2

Why exactly is this a problem? JK Rowling is a woman supporting a shelter for women…only. Admittedly, I can’t imagine cause for this story to significantly impact men’s rights in any way shape or form. Can someone fill me in here? If the issue is inclusion, launching a sex abuse center for women that includes men seems problematic to me for many reasons, but the primary reason being that inclusion of men-regardless of their story during a time where victims of abuse are particularly vulnerable w…
/r/MensRights13/12/22 05:07 AM
49

Your friends can’t get to her if she’s already taken 😉
/r/MensRights08/12/22 02:48 AM
1

You said yourself that the point was “bad” [faulty] generalizations. Your proof does not accurately depict the faulty generalizations because the stated conclusion does not follow the logic…if your point is to describe the issue of generalizations you need to produce a logical argument that very may well lead to a logical conclusion, but is fallacious and not always the case. Faulty generalization occurs when the absence of sufficient evidence results in a conclusion that may appear logical unde…
/r/MensRights05/12/22 10:43 AM
0

Lmfao. Lecturing on the pitfalls of logical fallacy while making generalizations about your audience using a theoretical system as proof to imply your audience would draw an invalid conclusion from your informal fallacy. Overgeneralization is bad. It is a logical fallacy. Stop doing it to others and don’t assume your audience is as void of logic and reasoning as you are. Rule of thumb, don’t assume your audience’s conclusion to your theoretical proof as fact implying it is the ONLY conclusion wh…
/r/MensRights04/12/22 08:33 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter