TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

EnnuiDeBlase Archive

View 0 posts and 141 comments by EnnuiDeBlase on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Okay.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/19 03:24 PM
1

Aww. Kali is one of my very best friends in real life and she is an adorable cinnamon roll of delight. Tagging people to talk shit on them isn't a particularly good look.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/19 02:55 PM
-1

This isn't askmensrights, either. That sub has a specific purpose.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 11:13 PM
1

K
/r/MGTOW07/05/17 12:05 AM
2

Who hurt you?
/r/MGTOW06/05/17 10:39 PM
2

In what subreddit would you not get banned for showing up and shitting on the people there?
/r/MGTOW06/05/17 08:01 AM
2

Didn't take 5 posts of truth to get myself permanently banned HAHAHAHAHAHAHA You shitposted the entire time and called women idiot retards, what did you expect?
/r/MGTOW06/05/17 04:50 AM
2

Isn't that what Planet Fitness is all about?
/r/MensRights16/05/15 03:22 AM
2

Yes, yes we do. Jesus Christ, this isn't hard. http://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/glotip/GLOTIP_2014_full_report.pdf Google: "UN human trafficking report 2014" Women 30% of traffickers. men/boys 18%/12% of victims. More specific data available in linked report.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 01:38 PM
1

I assure you I came to that opinion on my own, but thanks for the false assumption leading to an incorrect conclusion.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 08:28 AM
4

No one member exemplifies a group just as no group defines the total traits of its members.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 02:23 PM
5

They get lumped in with MRM and are highly caustic and easily shown to be ridiculously hateful. I personally want nothing to do with them and I think they only hurt meaningful discourse.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 02:20 PM
4

Dear god no, anything but that.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 02:17 PM
3

You can't ask someone to prove the lack of something like that. I haven't done anything to show that I'm not Bollywood hating, yet assuming that I do is silly and there's no examples to provide except the lack of Bollywood hating that anyone has ever seen.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 07:27 AM
14

Clearly you subscribe to the "click bait best bait" school of naming links.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 11:07 PM
2

Regardless of the validity of the article in question, why does this question need to be asked? This reeks of the 'whataboutism' that feminism often justifiably complains about. If we're discussing X, then why does the opposite gendered argument Y need to be discussed. There's other times for that. If we want to talk about MGM, it's not productive to bring up FGM. They're different issues. If you want to talk about FGM, it's not productive to bring up MGM. These people aren't trying to win the o…
/r/MensRights12/09/14 07:35 AM
1

Yeah, that's why I referenced the pdf pages in my perens. Often a problem with pdf's.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 10:09 AM
5

Why do you say that? Chapter 5 seems to discuss perpetrators as "a person who was determined to have caused or knowingly allowed the maltreatment of a child". Chapter 4 is related to fatalities (by Perpetrator Relationship is page 58).
/r/MensRights04/09/14 08:26 AM
18

http://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/cb/cm2012.pdf#page=76 (Actually page 68 of the pdf, scroll down a few)
/r/MensRights04/09/14 04:17 AM
3

blink Drinking is a very specific activity. You can drink at a ball game, and that's very clearly a public space. There's at least 7 places in the U.S. where you can drink on the streets. That argument doesn't seem very solid. There does not appear to be any "reasonable expectation of privacy" for bars either (though some want to ban google glass as is their right as a private entity for patrons who don't want their possible drunken shenanigans to be recorded for all posterity). I hesitate to in…
/r/MensRights06/08/14 09:28 AM
1

We were? I can't find that anywhere. I see that a woman likes to dress provocatively but hates when she is /actually harassed in meaningful ways/. Really, what I see is a Facebook message from a dude and talking about her post/experience through his lens. Even if what you said were true, though I can find no evidence of it, it still wouldn't change the fact that someone "dressed like a slut" invites attention while an airhorn forces itself into other spaces and disrupts attention.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 07:04 AM
3

Provocative has two meanings, the pair of which are being conflated here. It's like the "your nose can't be 12" because then it'd be a foot" dad-joke. Foot and foot have two different meanings, and pointing that out is the joke. If you can't figure out how a hot woman walking down the street is materially different from someone blaring an air horn while doing the same then I really hope no one asks you to ever defend anything about men's rights to anybody, ever.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 06:33 AM
1

Expressing that you think someone looks nice is not dehumanizing, and no one you should bother to argue with thinks that it is. Continuing to argue with tumbleristas isn't going to get us anywhere. Doign the v finger licking motion to a stranger as you walk by, grabbing a girls ass when she goes up to get a bar to get a soda, and other things (the first two are just what I've personally witnessed in the past few months) are things that are not at all acceptable and people should be accountable f…
/r/MensRights06/08/14 01:02 AM
4

The airhorn analogy is shit. If this women were coming up to you and shaking their loose or tightly bound boobs in your face you'd have much more of a reasonable analogy. As it stands, it's a stupid straw man and as such designed to knock away an argument without any good reasoning. Some good argument may exist, this is not it.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 12:50 AM
4

I have, it was fucking awful. She was pissed for days and rightly so. Got the dude kicked out of the bar she was in after going up to get a diet coke (yes, there was no drunkeness in her behavior, so cutting off that line of reasoning). He grabbed her ass, she pushed his hand away, he pushed her, she tripped, he got perma-banned from the bar.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 12:47 AM
1

As is almost every club I've been to, I went to a club as described above precisely once and never went back.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 07:04 AM
1

For posting in /r/mensrights you will now be slandered forever and disparaged by the general Reddit community. Cheers! /I keed /only partially
/r/MensRights24/05/14 06:50 AM
0

Maybe, except he doesn't.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 06:47 AM
8

Also you can pretty much run something as many times as you like until you get the result you want or you can just cordon off the area and pay everyone to be there. That said, this is no different than what any PSA does so I don't see that as a relevant criticism in this particular case.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 02:35 AM
2

A handful, sure.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 04:21 AM
6

TIA is my National Enquirer. Bunch of 16 year olds, mostly without real problems, manufacturing issues because they're bored.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 04:04 AM
8

Why should it be? The list of default subreddits is policy and gender neutral with a potential case being made against news/worldnews and the recent inclusion of TwoX. At face value, none of these tend to show a strong bias towards anything that would cause a huge fracas though the three mentioned will sometimes or often devolve into such in the comments. The inclusion that I'm guessing prompted this post was TwoX. Which, whatever. The subreddit isn't even remotely for me in the slightest and 90…
/r/MensRights17/05/14 03:30 AM
1

I wonder why the don't bother to acknowledge that this "gender role reversal" is merely the re-reversal of a change that occurred once already after the boy-babysitter 'miracle' of the 20's through early 70's.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 10:17 AM
10

The quantity of mental deficiency on Tumblr is so large that there is an endless supply of quotes to support any position or opinion now matter how strange or inane. A fairly useless place to source from imo. It is a great place to post pictures of cats, and art, and tattoos though, so there's that.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 02:53 PM
7

The only reason I downvoted you was because it's a blanket statement about this hard to perceive social system that didn't go into any particular detail about how this particular issue supports or rejects Patriarchy's framework.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 08:56 PM
2

This wasn't even an article, it was an underwear commercial and 28 pictures of impossibly hot dudes with a little bit of shaming. Tripe and trash with some hottie clickbait.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 05:47 AM
3

I have worked with a few. Not directed at me but definitely another coworker.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 06:17 PM
1

That's just mockery.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 03:49 PM
2

Personally I like this, if it is indeed gender neutral or willing to see men as the victims they are often ignored as. Those few scummy women who call themselves feminists but just spend their time bashing men and men's issues are unlikely to do anything to this display given its location.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 01:04 PM
0

Three of the handful of women I've dated over the years have acknowledged getting out of tickets via crying or generally looking like they were just engaged in harmless shenanigans. I myself got a warning when I deserved a ticket because I was halfway across the country and had the mother of the groom and the bride-to-be in my car.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 10:47 AM
1

Took about 15 second to google it: Southern Poverty Law Center
/r/MensRights04/04/14 07:02 AM
1

:)
/r/MensRights02/03/14 11:01 AM
3

Oh, I know he was sarcasming. I was just providing probably only at best tangentially relevant anecdotal evidence.
/r/MensRights02/03/14 10:21 AM
2

I have been routinely out-drunk by a woman 35 lbs my junior. It would be embarrassing if I weren't such a cheap drunk.
/r/MensRights02/03/14 09:41 AM
1

Anyone who doesn't like "First Day of My Life" has no soul. Truf.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 12:19 PM
3

Good friend of mine used to construct different routes home from work so as to avoid cat calls on the main streets virtually every single day.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 02:33 PM
1

Post-gazette forums routinely have a handful of racist trolls that will say the most disgusting shit you can imagine about any victim. I live here.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 06:03 AM
2

Good luck with that never ever happening.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 04:12 AM
1

Well, that sounds perfectly reasonable. How could I have been so silly?
/r/MensRights14/12/13 12:39 AM
3

Chiming in here, I've never had anything quite so serious happen but both times I've gone to therapy for issues I was never treated with anything but understanding and respect and everything was about helping me work past it.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 11:07 AM
16

I will never understand tumblr. Ever.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 03:50 AM
1

RIP Aaliyah :(
/r/MensRights02/12/13 09:25 AM
1

I've never heard beat poetry that I've liked, and the trend continues.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 10:56 AM
1

Did they just seriously steal making of Facebook story and turn it into an app on...Facebook? So meta.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 05:37 AM
2

You think that kind of person has a lot of time to hang out w/other people?
/r/MensRights21/11/13 06:57 AM
12

Yeah, that had to be my least favorite thing about college. People going way down the rabbit hole and not just having their own weird messed up ideas but projecting them onto others and then thinking they're some insightful expert.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 10:22 AM
7

That, exactly. Can you imagine the indignant outrage if he's so much as pushed them away and they fell down?
/r/MensRights14/11/13 09:57 AM
1

14th minor scuffle at particular sporting event draws ire of the crowd for unknown reasons.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 10:20 AM
10

This lesson is really important to learn.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 11:25 AM
3

Yeah, it's on the tvshowbiz section of dailymail. Hopefully people treat that opinion with the toilet paper it's worth.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 11:24 AM
2

Ignoring the obvious cherry-picking of her bad guys (I mean come on, the bad dudes in "the 'burbs" were just creepy old guys with bad hair and a lack of social skills we can look at it a bit more seriously. Such as this thought: Film uses amplification of character traits to create easy to recognize characters in a film that does not seek primarily character development and personal revelation. To that end the average scary looking dude well - we've all just seen him on the street after a few ba…
/r/MensRights18/10/13 07:04 AM
0

"Hey babe lets have a romp." "Nah, I'm busy." "Don't worry I'll do the laundry." "Oh, okay." Regardless of gender, this is "having to convince them." Granted about the weakest form of it you can imagine, but far from being an absurdist reduction, this is the length that they have gone to.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 05:44 AM
1

The gov't has a hard-on for hating drugs and will fund 'studies' that support their agenda. Who is this news to and more importantly what does it have to do with MRAs? Perhaps the DV aspect of it?
/r/MensRights27/09/13 07:22 AM
2

Let me be the one you back that ass to Yeah, that puts the power to the guy.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 10:03 AM
2

Yeah, good thing I didn't have my 0.05% chance pre-circumcision to get aids this year. That was totally worth it. <_< Post, assuming the dubious study can be believed, being somewhere around 0.03%? Yeah...
/r/MensRights18/09/13 03:41 PM
2

I love you.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 03:54 PM
4

It's kind of impossible to say. They only give fully employed figures.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 03:53 PM
2

I'd like to figure out how be part of the 10% of the population that managed to not be the primary breadwinner for my kids, with no spouse.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 03:50 PM
-1

Yeah, I never get this argument. Maybe it's a local speech thing? Children: Boys and girls Young adults AND FRIENDS: guys and girls Adults I don't know: men/guys and women So there we have female ambiguity across 2 categories and male ambiguity across 2 categories. It's resolved by context. *those I don't respect: bro's and ho's
/r/MensRights14/09/13 09:32 AM
4

I think we'll see a lot of fight, because heaven forbid men get a say in all this. It's happened before, it'll happen again.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 02:24 PM
3

Supposedly some are.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 01:45 PM
1

I skipped around and couldn't let it play non-stop for more than like 20 seconds if that.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 01:41 PM
1

That's what "youse guys" is for.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 07:10 AM
2

Quick google search reveals that it's basically twitter for video: 6 second cap. So basically...audio gifs.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 09:52 AM
6

I didn't even click on the link and my blood pressure was going up.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 02:53 AM
2

Again, all of which is entirely irrelevant to the discussion of a particular shard of the article at hand. Why do you assume I'm not calm? You quoted and replied directly to me, so how is it wrong of me to assume that your reply was not directed at me?
/r/MensRights29/08/13 08:44 AM
1

What are you even talking about? Nothing about my comment or the comment above mine had anything to do with whatever crime this individual was convicted of nor what gender pronoun they want to use. It was about ripping non-existent intent out of a statement and then using that to incite rage and/or passion.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 07:48 AM
0

Yeah, that's how I read it too and am somewhat surprised to see this at the bottom.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 01:35 AM
1

http://imgur.com/FmDd2k6
/r/MensRights27/08/13 04:43 AM
2

And that, she says is not promising “for adults trying to live authentically and navigate life’s real, human problems”. Why does she suppose that everyone wants to live authentically? If I can be happy with my life and I don't hurt others as a result, what's the downside to faking it now and again? Why can't I trade life's real human problems for fake problems?
/r/MensRights27/08/13 04:29 AM
3

Unfortunately we have no way of knowing. We see "sort of" his right hand doing something obscured by his body when she turns around. What that could be, be don't know. Then there's a cut in the video to him hitting her. Did he goose her? Did he just try to reach past her to get an item that was on the shelf? Impossible to know from the clip we saw, also unknown who initiated/escalated the argument to a physical level.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 10:42 AM
3

Regardless of the content of your posts, referencing yourself as a source isn't typically considered a valid argument tactic.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 09:47 AM
1

Not that I could find: http://www.cga.ct.gov/2003/olrdata/jud/rpt/2003-r-0376.htm
/r/MensRights10/08/13 09:41 AM
1

Thanks!
/r/MensRights09/08/13 07:49 AM
5

It's not that women can't be considered rapists (they can, via digital penetration or penetration by a foreign object). It's that "victims made to penetrate" isn't counted as rape as far as I've found. So if I strap a girl down and penetrate her(without her permission), that's rape. If a girl straps me down and forces me inside her(without my permission), that's just aggravated sexual assault.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 04:44 AM
8

I went with my buddy. Clearly we're gay pedophiles, the deadly duo!
/r/MensRights08/08/13 08:15 AM
1

Ah, certainly there were. See also: Dollhouse. Pretty much it's Joss Whedon being awesome at writing compelling stories and having good actors to go with it. That said, I don't see how the specific companion relationship was shown to work with a female leader/male subordinate in the past, though I'd gladly take any examples. I could see a lot of people being pissy if a female doctor was confused, also I have no idea why this issue even came up in the first place. It's not as if companions have a…
/r/MensRights07/08/13 10:05 AM
7

Yep. Further, if you're high enough to definitively not be pushing on breasts then you're "choking". You can't reasonably go lower unless you're as tall or shorter.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 09:57 AM
-1

When the mouth-breather has been eyeing you uncomfortably for too long.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 08:55 AM
1

Are you saying you don't feel pretty?
/r/MensRights07/08/13 08:50 AM
1

Giles had a fatherly role to Buffy. Xander had an un-returned crush on Buffy, and he was the comic relief. Angel couldn't be stronger than Buffy because he is a vampire, and she's a vampire slayer. He was a "good" vampire, so it was okay. But no sex, ever. Spike was an independently bad boy and Buffy was making a bad decision by going for him. His redemption path is a well worn trope of "women make men better people". Oz had no interest in her, and went for Willow. He was a Werewolf, she was a n…
/r/MensRights07/08/13 08:26 AM
50

My favorite part is that when she screamed "get your hand off my breasts now" she's not yelling at him, she's facing the crowd. It was all show, pure and simple.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 07:33 AM
-2

Pure class.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 02:27 AM
2

I know I ended up here from somewhere else on Reddit, but I'll be damned if I can remember where. Probably some very downvoted comment, or in response to one.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 11:23 AM
3

It's almost as if men are more likely to be generous around attractive women. Oh wait, yeah, we know that to be true.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 10:41 AM
1

I got very concerned right around the shotgun.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 09:49 AM
4

Other people are not glad that they are. There's a host of reasons, I don't need to link them here. Suffice to say, they feel wronged and their lifelong sexual life changed for the worse without their say-so.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 03:25 AM
4

Except when it doesn't.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 03:46 PM
2

Standard push-up is straight legged, from arms fully straightened to nose almost touching the floor?
/r/MensRights27/07/13 10:07 AM
1

Reddit and eyebrows, I've seen this in multiple subreddits now. WHAT IS IT?!?
/r/MensRights27/07/13 12:41 AM
3

I would love to read that, just for a laugh, if you happen to have it handy. Edit: http://www.nbc12.com/story/21416300/judge-orders-1-a-month-in-child-support
/r/MensRights26/07/13 04:48 AM
1

Yay, you both noticed the "move the goalposts". :)
/r/MensRights25/07/13 02:02 PM
3

And yet, how would you feel if 18 years of your life and income hinged on the whims of another person, whether you were tricked into it, it was an accident, or you yourself wanted to change your mind?
/r/MensRights25/07/13 01:46 PM
1

Vowel_reduction_nazi?
/r/MensRights25/07/13 09:22 AM
3

Saving grammar, one post at a time.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 09:18 AM
17

It's actually more accurate to re-frame the abortion issue as 100%/0% when it comes to ignoring desires. It just happens that men get their way in 50% of the possible outcomes, but their desire is in no way factored in the outcome.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 08:22 AM
1

Sigh, more videos that start with parties already agitated from previous unknown actions.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 05:49 AM
2

Lacking any and all context, I find it difficult to form a valid opinion about this bit of video. That said, it was amusing to watch her pitch a crying fit over cigarettes and a boat ride - not exactly life necessities.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 11:09 AM
0

I didn't know that! That's awesome to know. However, I feel that this observation is highly relevant. Most people don't know that and assume what evansmiller (and I myself until 2 minutes ago) believe, and this is how they frame their opinions when that tactic is used.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 07:04 AM
2

Well.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 05:44 AM
1

I don't get too riled up over this, but what bugs me on some level is the different way we're talked about. 19 men died in a fire, and in the news reports I watched not once was their gender mentioned. When 12 people die in a 9 car pileup "including 7 women and children", it's obvious who we care about more.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 05:13 AM
1

Ah-hah! I thought you were accusing me of cherry-picking, which I try not to do. Sorry about the miscommunication. I blame the internet for lack of tone and body language. :(
/r/MensRights01/07/13 12:39 PM
1

What do we have to suggest that child abusers self-select to become childcare providers? I'm certainly not saying it isn't possible, but what data do we have to suggest that it's more likely than the default position? I'd love to read more.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 05:03 AM
3

I wasn't referring to the article, merely a generalized statistic caimis suggested.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 02:42 AM
4

What study was I talking about? What cherry picking? This is how math works.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 02:41 AM
3

Always has been, well worth watching: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFQFB5YpDZE
/r/MensRights01/07/13 12:15 AM
33

This is purely a math example, and numbers do not relate to the situation at hand: 100 women are caregivers, 10 men are caregivers. 20 of those women commit abuse, 4 of the men commit abuse. 20% of female caregivers commit abuse, 40% of male caregivers commit abuse. This is how I've always seen these numbers suss out, if you can give me different ones I'll be glad to look at them.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 12:07 AM
22

By raw number, not by percentage. Just, you know, being pedantic.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 11:11 PM
1

We believe you, but it's less hassle to punish you than argue with them. Talk about throwing you under the bus, jeebus.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 05:05 AM
6

My earliest evidence of this that I recall was in 8th grade. Someone threw something while the teacher's back was turned, don't actually know who it was. Boys were punished by having to sit in their seats during recess, girls got to go play because (I know it must have been a boy, girls don't do that).
/r/MensRights30/06/13 04:33 AM
6

I realized a girl was talking to me only so long as I was doing things for her. I stopped, she tried once more, and realized I figured it out.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 04:27 AM
5

I've read the first 3 and I'm halfway through the 4th. I'm typically considered a reasonable and passably intelligent individual. I called it "fire and ice" until I was proven wrong, in print.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 03:13 AM
7

Yeah, I make greater than the median income in my area and my job is degrees of magnitude less stressful than college or grad school ever were.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 11:16 AM
1

Because lots of people actually want to have kids. May of the women in their 30's that I see in online dating don't want to have kids, making some anecdtotal implication that they're less desirable mates.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 03:38 AM
5

You know, there's this little down arrow on facebook posts. And if you click on it, you can choose "Hide Story". Then you don't have to see it.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 03:16 AM
1

Most girls are pubescent by 13, this kills the pedophile title and replaces it with ephebophile - but I see your point.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 02:12 AM
1

Yeah, pedophile is very precise. It involves pre-pubescent as the object of desire, and generally 5 or more years difference.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 05:27 PM
1

Yeah, whether or not the laws on statutory rape are okay or not where they're at is, I feel, going to be a debate that will never end as the perception of 'adult' age will shift with the path of civilization. What really just gets me here is the obvious gender bias, and the gay thing seems nothing more as a transparent deflection of the real issue.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 12:52 PM
10

You know you start breathing when you pass out.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 03:15 AM
2

Yep, they all suck. :(
/r/MensRights18/05/13 08:40 AM
2

Thank you for being the pedant we needed. Not the one we wanted.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 07:51 AM
2

Thank you. I like this response, it is much more explanatory and deep. :D
/r/MensRights22/04/13 04:13 PM
-1

That kind of general statement would require a fair bit of data about the incidence of rape performed at gunpoint. I couldn't find it, perhaps you can?
/r/MensRights22/04/13 03:08 AM
2

Amusingly if he were married to the mother of the child, then they divorced, in more than a few cases he'd still be required to pay child support if a dna test revealed that the kid was't his because 'it's in the best interest of the child.' Apparently they can have it both ways.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 03:51 PM
1

4 potential sources and a bunch of wordpress blogs. /nice/
/r/MensRights19/04/13 03:48 PM
10

At least alcohol doesn't mean rape this time. Silver lining and all.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 10:35 AM
5

Linky?
/r/MensRights19/01/13 08:41 AM
7

Because there is a point of audacity past which Patriarchy can't be relevant. If a woman is in her car, alone, and drives drunkenly into street light there's no one to blame but her. Now, when it gets to sentencing and adjudication comes into play that's when preferential treatment can sneak back in.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 08:03 AM
6

Though I don't think it was properly stated by faghat, I think the point being made here is that these steps protect everyone. From the doe-eyed star-crossed lovers with art degrees and $90,000 debt a piece, to the man who's going to get cleaned out by a gold digger, to the woman who's going to get screwed over by a deadbeat.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 07:45 AM
8

But...29% of those deaths were caused by mothers. 31% by fathers. Infanticide is an issue, but we can't ban parents.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 06:35 AM
6

Not to niggle, but we have some buildings on our campus that were science buildings back in the 40's and had no women's bathrooms in them. When they switched them to women, they never bothered to take out the urinals. You're right, I just thought you might enjoy the anecdote.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 10:00 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter