TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

EnvironmentalWar4627 Archive

View 3 posts and 2,292 comments by EnvironmentalWar4627 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,292 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-14

Yes, isn't it awesome to see so many men acknowledging they are struggling and sharing their experiences?
/r/MensRights17/02/22 03:37 PM
-2

Racist loses its meaning meaning you liberal feminists are offended by everything.
/r/MensRights17/02/22 12:10 PM
-17

Lol you're really interested in being offended. Please don't cancel me.
/r/MensRights17/02/22 11:52 AM
-13

I listed several groups.
/r/MensRights17/02/22 11:40 AM
-6

And yet you don't believe the women that complain about their husband for some reason. But you immediately believe the men. Isn't that ofd?
/r/MensRights17/02/22 11:39 AM
-17

I see. So you feel the social problem isn't that people are selfish since 99 percent of men will do whatever their wife asks. It's women that are the social problem.
/r/MensRights17/02/22 11:14 AM
-30

Agreed. But 99 percent of people on a feminist sub is a pretty good litmus test. Definitely good to see many feminists are coming around.
/r/MensRights17/02/22 11:06 AM
-19

Yes, husband's should be able to rely on their wives for support and wives should be able to rely on their husband's for support. And yet you see many posts from women saying they can't rely on their husband's and posts from men saying they can't rely on their wives. I just don't know what the social problem is. That people can't be relied on and are inherently selfish and dismissive? Because that's probably got some truth to it.
/r/MensRights17/02/22 10:50 AM
-35

Look at all these feminists discussing how it's normal for men to be afraid of walking alone Edit: I figured people would be happy to see feminists discussing men as victims. Sometimes I think people would rather wallow in self pity than acknowledge the good things that are happening in the world. Feminists seeing men as victims is a huge win for the mens rights movement.
/r/MensRights17/02/22 10:24 AM
-19

They don't. Feminists clearly acknowledge men can be scared of walking alone If someone said this to you, they are an idiot. And not representative of men, white people, women, Christians or any other group they may have been part of
/r/MensRights17/02/22 10:18 AM
-26

That reddit thread was a man opening up and it seems they were met with a huge amount of support and affirmation from the reddit community. What a helpful subreddit that must be.
/r/MensRights17/02/22 10:11 AM
-20

She's doing 41 years in jail. Is that not what accountability looks like? Or was this just more about complaining about women?
/r/MensRights17/02/22 01:58 AM
-10

I think any good cause is clear in what their issues are.
/r/MensRights17/02/22 12:15 AM
-19

Are men the dogs that are going to turn on their oppressors? Because it will be tough to determine who the oppressors are? Women? Rich people? Employers? The government? Who are the people the dogs will need to bite?
/r/MensRights16/02/22 11:08 PM
-4

So what are your thoughts on cat calling? Privilege? Or inappropriate?
/r/MensRights16/02/22 09:50 PM
-1

Come on. Even you must admit saying being cat called is a privilege is bad optics. We bicker but I know you're smart enough to see that.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 09:10 PM
2

Seems like she was complaining about sexism that was directed at her by specifically one man. TwoX is toxic but I don't see what the issue is here.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 05:45 PM
-1

Why would a family take more time from a woman's career than a man's?
/r/MensRights16/02/22 02:13 PM
0

Saying 'women usually make less so all women have to work longer' is no different than saying 'men usually make more money so all men have to pay a man tax to women to balance it out' If YOU REALLY wanted to solve this without just making a broad generalization to hurt women, it would be based on income and not gender. Many women make FAR more than many men. Should they have to pay more in tax to compensate the rest based solely on their gender? Obviously not. And the fact that you're suggesting…
/r/MensRights16/02/22 01:16 PM
1

Either this or a higher age of retirement for women. So that men don't end up paying women's expenses. Arguing to punish women because of their gender is a very strange approach.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 01:04 PM
-2

Well, the true number is 4. And hopefully male life expectancy is raises in the future. Reduced crime rates / suicide rates would help a lot.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 01:03 PM
0

I don't really understand your point. Isn't it obvious to everyone women would make more money if they worked more and more dangerous jobs? No one would refute that point. The gender gap is just a complicated combination of many things.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 01:01 PM
-25

But are men any more or less likely to whine about personal problems? How would that explain gaps in pay. I imagine they are equally likely to be whiny.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 12:26 PM
1

Agreed. But if you could pay women 30k and men 40k, you still want to hire men and women. Some people are worth 40k, men and women. Hiring only women would be cheaper, but you would potentially moss out on great hires that are worth the 40k. If someone is 33 percent more proficient, it's worth it.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 12:24 PM
-1

Which 2 don't you agree with?
/r/MensRights16/02/22 12:16 PM
-35

I suppose if he feels the 'problems with women' are just specifically his workplace, then it's not a huge issue. Although people usually don't confine their stereotypes like that. He may feel men are just as likely to bring their emotional problems to work... but... I doubt it.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 12:14 PM
-11

Because hiring only half the hiring pool gives you less access to talent. Obviously that's bad for a business.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 12:13 PM
-10

But wouldnt men solve this problem by workong less overtime, takong more sick days, and taking less dangerous jobs that pay less? Isnt it a choice to make more money? Its like saying men pay more in taxes when they make 100k vs 50k and thats not fair.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 12:12 PM
-47

they take FAR LESS sick leaves they don't bring their emotional problems from home to work (women do!) they are far more aggressive when it comes to promotion- they are ready to compete, to give their 120%, they are more willing to take the challenge they work far more extra hours most of guys are handy men- don't get me wrong, we have maintenance department, but many times it's simple thing we can do ourselves without waiting for them. Guess who's hands gonna get dirty? People say the pay gap d…
/r/MensRights16/02/22 11:43 AM
-9

Does this have anything to do with mens rights though? Should men have to pay less into social security or should women get less benefits after they retire? Is that what you want to discuss? Men make more money in their lifetime because they are more motivated to make more money. It's hard to argue that's a real problem.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 11:34 AM
0

Do some time in federal prison and tell me if you like having guys cat call you as you walk by. Tell me if you still think it's a privilege. Saying street harassment is a privilege might be the most misogynistic thing I've seen on this subreddit. However I'm guessing I'll get the downvotes here, not you.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 11:18 AM
-8

Suggesting that the police/criminal justice system don't take rape seriously but only take other crimes seriously is false. This is the evidence debunking this myth. Does this have anything to do with mens rights though? Are mens rights regarding reporting rape even mentioned?
/r/MensRights16/02/22 11:12 AM
-5

I don't think assuming someone is less valuable because they are single is valid. Man or woman.
/r/MensRights15/02/22 10:12 PM
0

Agreed. It's exactly like calling single men incels. So why are people upvoting it when its directed at women?
/r/MensRights15/02/22 08:35 PM
-4

But isn't this whole post about how it's not worth the risk to date a woman that makes less money that you? Doesn't that mean both men and women don't want to date someone that makes less money than them?
/r/MensRights15/02/22 02:16 PM
-10

If they aren’t even valuable enough to find a partner, then what makes them think they’ll be ready to have children by themselves? Can you imagine someone applying this logic to men? It would be like assuming all single men don't have value because they can't find a partner. How offensive would that be?
/r/MensRights15/02/22 12:44 PM
-18

If it's selfish to choose to be a single mother, isn't it also selfish to choose for your kid to grow up without a father or support?
/r/MensRights15/02/22 12:40 PM
-22

Does no one else appreciate the irony of 2 of the last 4 posts being so opposing? One saying men should be able to financially abort their children creating more single mothers. The next saying how single mothers are terrible for society and women are selfish degenerates for wanting to have children without a partner.
/r/MensRights15/02/22 12:36 PM
-9

But if you took support from single moms, wouldn't the children of single mothers suffer more than most?
/r/MensRights15/02/22 11:41 AM
-10

There are millions and millions of successful married women. What do you mean?
/r/MensRights15/02/22 11:12 AM
-13

Not if your wife is successful and makes good money.
/r/MensRights15/02/22 10:28 AM
-13

Paper abortion would lead to many more single moms in society that require government support. This would be expensive.
/r/MensRights15/02/22 10:19 AM
-2

95 percent of men don't think men are discriminated against at all. So it will be tough to convince them to abandon society when most men don't even know there is a problem. I think things would have to get bad enough for men to notice before there is a mass exodus.
/r/MensRights15/02/22 10:14 AM
0

Leaving a child before birth, they still grow up without a father. Getting an abortion, the child doesn't grow up at all. 2 very different things in regards to how they are viewed.
/r/MensRights14/02/22 06:32 PM
1

That's just science. You don't abort a child, you abort a fetus. But once the fetus is born, it's a child. That's more about Roe V Wade than shaming tactics.
/r/MensRights14/02/22 06:25 PM
-6

Semantics really. Although I imagine most men will still choose to raise their children as they want to make sure their children are cared for. Some men however would prefer to just avoid the responsibility and leave the mom to raise their child alone. At least they would have the choice.
/r/MensRights14/02/22 12:36 PM
-3

True. The legal right to abandon your children has become popular in many mens movements. Perhaps society will shift in that direction. Although I don't think society will ever see abandoning a fetus (abortion) and abandoning a child the same way.
/r/MensRights14/02/22 12:18 PM
7

For the father to have an equal say, there would be situations where you are forcing a woman to give birth against her will or forcing a woman to have an abortion against her will. It would be pretty messed up to force someone to go through such invasive things within their own body against their will. That's probably why women get the final say.
/r/MensRights14/02/22 11:02 AM
-11

Agreed. Which is why this commenter calling it a 'non issue' and getting upvoted is messed up. Why are we dismissing sexual assault against men and then wondering why men who are sexually assaulted aren't taken seriously?
/r/MensRights13/02/22 04:04 PM
3

So you agree that the comments generalizing women are misogyny?
/r/MensRights13/02/22 03:35 PM
-1

I'm not sure it makes sense to give the guy that said "Most women and all feminists are constently looking to find ways to feel victimized because they want the narrative that women are victims to be verified." The benefit of the doubt in regards to sexism.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 03:24 PM
-1

And then devolving into the kids with different dads? That was just good natured ribbing? The lengths people go to to defend these shitty takes is crazy.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 03:12 PM
-6

OP didn't mention Injustice within the law once. He just listed his issues with women. Lol. I'm starting to think you and him aren't so different.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 02:29 PM
-8

Do you think Taylor swift made too big of a deal of it when she was sexually assaulted? You won't answer that question because you know the answer is no. And saying she did is obviously misogyny. Yet you defend someone that is saying that. Curious.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 02:22 PM
-20

He certainly implied Taylor swift overreacted. And 'luckily' this man didn't. Why defend obvious misogyny just because you don't like me?
/r/MensRights13/02/22 02:15 PM
2

Agreed. Although calling me a pedophile apologist for wanting different rape cases treated differently in the criminal justice system isn't a diverse opinion. It's a childish attempt to follow me around and insult me. And as mentioned, your obsession with me, while flattering, doesn't really suggest you are all that interested in debate and exchange of ideas. Just petty name calling. That's not something any intelligent person does.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 02:08 PM
2

I'm aware it's rape and never said otherwise. Different kinds of rape can be handled differently by the court. Just like different kinds of murder are handled differently.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 01:57 PM
-29

If the roles were reversed, this woman would have pressed charges and made a huge deal about it like Tayler swift when she got groped. Luckily men are much more laid back and he probably didn't care at all so it's a non issue. It kind of sounds like you're saying women shouldn't make such a big deal about be sexually assaulted and that's a really messed up thing to say. Then you go on to say most women are just looking to feel victimized because they are reporting when they are sexually assaulte…
/r/MensRights13/02/22 01:51 PM
1

You don't believe most men have high enough grades to attend college. I disagree. Men are smart enough to get good grades even with the biases they face.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 01:51 PM
3

I said it SHOULDNT be treated the same as violent rape in terms of sentencing and rehabilitation. Because they are different crimes. But you know that. You just are so angry about me not agreeing with everything that you want to follow me around and make up lies. I've disagreed with a lot of people obviously and no one else has obsessed over me like you. It's almost flattering.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 01:47 PM
-4

No no. I know males are given worse grades. That doesn't mean they aren't qualified for college.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 01:41 PM
0

I'm not sure how treating two different crimes differently in court is pedophilia apologia, but you seem content to follow me around and harass me because my opinion differs. It's incredibly childish and I think says more about you than it does me.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 01:40 PM
2

It's important to surround yourself with different opinions. It keeps you mentally sharp and balanced. Echochambers are lazy and uninspired. I have learned many things I would not have known and appreciate those things. But I have also seen people that refuse to acknowledge anything other than what they want to believe and that saddens me.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 01:33 PM
-5

Males are absolutely qualified for college and are getting high enough grades to go to college. They just choose not to.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 01:31 PM
-52

Men are not avoiding university because of their marks. Universities will let men in with lower makes to create balance. Men aren't applying because many have other options that women don't view as options for them. Like trades, factories, manufacturing, or construction. All pay much better than typical female jobs without a degree, like secretary, receptionist, customer service, or retail.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 01:04 PM
-54

I'm not sure what your point is. I was saying the education gap may not be a sign of an imbalance in society, and rather than discussing, you want to talk about different topics? Why not discuss the topic we are discussing? Imbalance in gender in higher learning.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 12:52 PM
-7

The article was a poll about feelings so I figured it would make sense to discuss the article. Sorry that bothered you.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 12:46 PM
-78

Is it not possible that the education gap is widening because men are better off than women? Men are able to make a good living in construction, trades, and other fields dominated by men. For example, women have been the majority in university for a while and yet men still make more money overall. Thats a good indicator that women being the majority in university doesn't translate to more access to money, power, or status.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 12:29 PM
-1

So you're saying there are gaps showing black people are disadvantaged. Which means white people are advantaged. That must be the wite privilege people are talking about. A valid point.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 12:17 PM
-5

66 percent of the population favored affirmative action Initiatives. This does help in areas where one gender is under represented. I know where I am, male teachers are hired faster and female engineers are sought after.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 12:13 PM
-11

Only 33 percent of women feel that men and women have equal footing when it comes to job opportunities. Employers worrying about pregnancy, missed time due to family and women caring more about the home life than the work life may be a factor here. Perhaps more research should be done into hiring and promotional practices of large businesses to see if any discrimination is happening.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 12:12 PM
-6

"Men, in particular, white men, are the most despised, disposable demographic in our western society." AVFM really knows how to play to their audience. White men that want to feel like they are being discriminated against because perpetual victimization breeds clicks. White people aren't despised in the west and saying that is so hyperbolic its embarrassing and it's just so obviously trying to stir up anger.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 03:06 AM
-15

I think most people aren't that worried about trying to prove if men or women have it worse. Most people know it sucks being homeless regardless of your gender.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 12:29 AM
-99

Feminists don't care about manspreading. No one does other than people that are offended by it.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 12:21 AM
-17

Over hundreds of years, women's quality of life and freedoms have been dramatically increased by the women's movement. They can now choose of they want to work, stay at home, rely on themselves, get educated, inherit businesses. All things that weren't common 100 years ago. Not sure if feminism had anything to do with it...but it certainly is better now for women than 100 years ago. Someone made that happen.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 12:15 AM
-3

It was a simple question. But I can understand why you're uncomfortable answering. It's all good man.
/r/MensRights12/02/22 10:17 PM
-3

No. I'm on topic. I think anyone that says toxic femininity or toxic masculinity is an idiot. I'm just wondering who agrees with me so I asked. Do you agree with me?
/r/MensRights12/02/22 10:12 PM
-3

No. I just asked if the term 'toxic femininity' is only said by fuckwits. What do you think?
/r/MensRights12/02/22 10:05 PM
-6

People seem to think toxic femininity exists. Do you think only fuckwits use that term?
/r/MensRights12/02/22 09:30 PM
-30

I assumed I would be upvoted for calling out the unnecessary assumptions about women.
/r/MensRights12/02/22 09:27 PM
-71

How do we know this? Are we just assuming this girl is a superficial and material person? Is it because she's a girl we assume that?
/r/MensRights12/02/22 07:41 PM
-7

I think this was posted by some pick up artist trash in an attempt to convince men they aren't 'manly' enough so they will join his channel and find out how to be an alpha. But anyone putting so much effort into proving they are a man is an insecure and pathetic person.
/r/MensRights12/02/22 04:03 PM
-2

Yes many of those theories were part of feminist theory. But to assume all feminists think that is quite obviously foolish and you either know that and you're misleading on purpose or you haven't figured it out yet. The core beliefs of Christianity is that you can beat your slave with a rod as long as they don't die. Would you say all Christians today support beating slaves? That's the logic you're applying to feminism and you can see why it's very very wrong.
/r/MensRights12/02/22 04:01 PM
0

The article says one particular lawyers cases were mostly their foreign mother. They article doesn't state what the overall trend is. Is it still a mens rights issue when we don't know if it's women or men doing it more? Should we wait and make sure it can be blamed on women to confirm it is needed a mens rights issue?
/r/MensRights12/02/22 02:53 PM
-4

Yeah. 90 percent of that is not what feminists think. But you make a pretty good argument that feminism is toxic if you're allowed to just make up what they think.
/r/MensRights12/02/22 12:32 PM
-10

So it's misandry to think that any society favours men? And yet saying society today is gyocentric isn't misogyny? I can't see how you can hold these inconsistent beliefs.
/r/MensRights12/02/22 12:09 PM
-15

It kind of sounds like youre saying it's unfair to judge all MRAs as misognyist but fair to blame all feminists as misandrists. Seems like really off logic.
/r/MensRights12/02/22 11:43 AM
-14

Many people assume that's mens rights activists / antifeminists are represented by incels and misogynists when in reality that's not true. Those voices are just often the voices shared in other subreddits. It would be unfair to generalize all feminists and no one would ever do that so no one should generalize all MRAs either.
/r/MensRights12/02/22 09:48 AM
-7

This law is going to put men that murder women in jail for longer. However men that murder women don't seem like the best group to defend.
/r/MensRights12/02/22 01:36 AM
-22

As opposed to all those criminals that just say they are guilty and ask for the max sentence..
/r/MensRights11/02/22 11:46 PM
-28

At first I wondered how this was a mens rights issue, but then I saw it was a woman that left the baby in the car. And women doing horrible things are mens rights issues for some reason.
/r/MensRights11/02/22 09:49 PM
-41

Who does?
/r/MensRights11/02/22 09:48 PM
-6

I think men should quit their higher paying jobs and get jobs as secretaries just to fight the gyocentric attitudes in society.
/r/MensRights11/02/22 01:00 PM
0

I've never said anything mosandrist. You just think people that believe in equality are anti men.
/r/MensRights11/02/22 11:53 AM
-1

Nah. People just like an echo chamber of self victimization. Just like feminists.
/r/MensRights11/02/22 10:54 AM
0

Many post about how male mental health issues are ignored. But then this gets posted to normalize male mental health issues and it gets 8 upvotes... Seems even the people that complain about mental health issues being ignored are just as guilty as the feminists for ignoring it.
/r/MensRights11/02/22 10:35 AM
1

This looks like an actual attempt to help men. You won't see much traction here for that. Try posting this again with the title 'feminists are the worst' so people actually pay attention.
/r/MensRights11/02/22 10:33 AM
0

We've all heard examples of toxic masculinity. What would example of toxic femininity be? What's a traditionally female trait that in excess amounts, can become hurtful to yourself or people around you?
/r/MensRights10/02/22 10:54 PM
-6

and as long as "equality" in this case is only focusing on those true issues, with a solution that does not negatively affect men, then it is a step towards true equality. But won't all pushes for equality negatively effect men? If men make up 80 percent of politicians and feminists want equality, men will lose lots of jobs as politicians to make room for women. Many people view this example as women taking something away from men and it can lead to very negative feelings about the gender. If me…
/r/MensRights10/02/22 11:05 AM
-5

Are you suggesting some kind if affirmative action where men with less qualifications get into colleges easier? Men are less than 40 percent of applicants so to get it to 50/50 you would need to lower standards for men.
/r/MensRights09/02/22 10:32 AM
-4

Or, he best her ass but she can't prove it
/r/MensRights09/02/22 10:20 AM
-9

I don't think that females are any more or less entitled than anyone else. People are people. Some suck.
/r/MensRights09/02/22 01:31 AM
-9

No. I'm saying people that don't believe you should say toxic masculinity shouldn't say toxic femininity.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 11:17 PM
-21

I don't understand about how people can't see the blatant hypocrisy in saying toxic masculinity doesn't exist and that masculinity isn't toxic...and then immediately turning around and claiming something is toxic femininity. Why not at least pretend to be a neutral source instead of being so open about the hypocrisy. Proof
/r/MensRights08/02/22 11:08 PM
0

Saying they are different crimes is not saying it is okay. It's sad when conversations devolve into such embarrassing accusations.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 02:52 PM
-8

I see, change the topic and flip to accusations. Way easier than defending your opinion that showing women negatively is a focus for you.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 12:54 PM
-2

Lol. I'd want to change the topic too if someone quoted my obvious misogyny.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 12:51 PM
-3

Posting it in an attempt to make people think less of women as a whole is misogyny. Which you already admitted when you said posting these things was "Examples to draw upon to counter the "Women Are Wonderful" effect is important to shifting gynocentric attitudes."
/r/MensRights08/02/22 12:48 PM
-1

Oh. I didn't see MAJOR. Yeah, no large movement cares about that effect. No large group of people even know it exists because it's not easily noticeable in society.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 12:47 PM
0

You said showing women in a negative light was "Examples to draw upon to counter the "Women Are Wonderful" effect is important to shifting gynocentric attitudes.". I'm saying showing women in a negative light shouldn't change your opinion of other women at all. But you seem very focused on viewing women as an entity instead of individually. This is not a healthy outlook and one that is obviously toxic on FDS.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 12:45 PM
0

This one That's not to mention the idea of reducing describing women to describing them as 'pussy, tits, and clits'. That's nondifferent than describing a man as a walking ATM. Holy sexist.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 12:39 PM
-6

No one on earth thinks women are incapable of bad action. At all.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 12:36 PM
-2

Should a woman doing something bad change your opinion about all women at all? Should a man doing something bad change your opinion about all men?
/r/MensRights08/02/22 12:33 PM
-6

The 'women are wonderful' effect is saying people think too much of women and counteracting that seems to be a common theme. Hardly seems delusional. People openly admit it.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 12:14 PM
-11

People seem to want everyone to think less of women. I guess I'm just surprised to hear people say it. Seemed like one of those unspoken things.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 11:52 AM
-51

I find a lot of people hint at what they want to say without saying it. Not sure if it's fear or what.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 11:34 AM
-21

So you believe it's important to tell everyone that women... aren't wonderful? Isn't it a pretty fine line between that and misogyny?
/r/MensRights08/02/22 11:33 AM
-56

What's the truth?
/r/MensRights08/02/22 11:04 AM
-8

I'd say forcible rape and sex witha minor should carry different sentences. I think that makes sense. The rehabilitation for the 2 is different as the crimes are very different.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 11:03 AM
-19

Women in their 20s are sometimes overlooked for promotions because employers worry they will get pregnant. Most developed countries have maternity leave and losing higher ranking employees is generally tougher on a business. Many people also assume women that are promoted are 'diversity hires' when their qualifications are there. Many people also assume men are better leaders and some studies have been done showing percentages of people uncomfortable with a female president.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 10:36 AM
0

He said "they all have the same beliefs about women's rights and the same prejudice against men's basic rights" Do you agree? Do you think all women have the same prejudice against mens basic rights? ALL women. If you agree with that, you're a misogynist and here you are defending it.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 10:20 AM
-103

Are you hoping that would prove something negative about women? Is showing women in a negative light helpful to men in some way?
/r/MensRights08/02/22 10:18 AM
-17

Sex with a minor is a different crime than rape in the UK . Rape is for forced penetration. That's why This man and These men weren't charged with rape. Are you sure males are charged with rape in this scenario or is that just something you are assuming?
/r/MensRights08/02/22 10:15 AM
-1

You openly admit you don't see a difference between women and feminists Then go around saying you hate feminists and wonder why people think you have issues with women? Bold strategy cotton.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 01:36 AM
1

A woman will likely lie on behalf of any other woman who tries to accuse you of something. Is this anything other than an obvious contempt and distrust for women? Dealing with your issues with women will help you far more in life than the buddy system.
/r/MensRights07/02/22 02:03 PM
-13

Both have their merit. And yet OP has 85 upvotes and my article has negative 2. It's possible that people just choose what they want to believe and then mindlessly believe anything that confirms those beliefs.
/r/MensRights07/02/22 12:33 PM
-14

So what do you think is a better analysis? The article I posted or OPs social media browsing?
/r/MensRights07/02/22 11:46 AM
-4

Empathy is hard to define. They did a study in an attempt to quantify it. You watch TikTok. I like to think their opinion is more well thought out.
/r/MensRights07/02/22 10:23 AM
-18

The notion that women are vastly more empathetic then men is just very wrong Here's a compex scientific study that looked at empathy between the genders. Even as toddlers women showed more signs of empathy and this difference increased as they age. By adulthood, women show much larger amounts of empathy than their male counterparts. This research seems more valid to me than you watching social media posts and deciding this research is invalid. Scientific study on empathy in gender
/r/MensRights07/02/22 10:16 AM
-17

Yeah, people that are entitled are the worst. What does this have to do with mens rights though? Do you feel your family members are representative of all women? Edit: AM I being downvoted because I refuse to judge an entire gender by just a few people? Does that not seem like more of a female dating strategy thing?
/r/MensRights07/02/22 10:07 AM
-5

Where do men win out?
/r/MensRights06/02/22 10:41 PM
-11

That may work for 99.9 percent of men. But it's better to completely change your life out of fear of something that will likely never happen to you.
/r/MensRights06/02/22 09:52 PM
-2

Who are these feminists defending it? Anyone in the last 6 years? Because I don't think so.
/r/MensRights06/02/22 06:44 PM
-5

Right. That's a GREAT reason not to marry this girl. Not sure it says much about anyone else though.
/r/MensRights06/02/22 02:31 PM
-5

This article says the man isnt responsible for debts prior to the relationship. Wouldn't this be a reason it's safer to get married?
/r/MensRights06/02/22 01:41 PM
-1

I don't want to argue. I just like women. I have no interest in trying to change your mind.
/r/MensRights06/02/22 01:11 PM
-9

In a traditional society sex outside of marriage would be considered debauchery. Also the amount of people now considering porn and only fans a genuine career path. Or the way many women now dress in revealing manners. Saying women haven’t changed is crazy talk Yeah, but these are all just the ramblings of angry trad cons that think women aren't what they used to be. I like that women have the confidence to dress how they want. I think women are better for it.
/r/MensRights06/02/22 12:54 PM
-18

Most women marry for love, not money. So the reason they try to make it work is often because they love their partner. But sometimes people grow apart and want different things, in those cases, they should get a divorce. Imbalances in family court aren't really women changing. That's society changing. And no, most women don't have too much sex. That's just dated idea of women losing value for each sexual partner. It's dumb.
/r/MensRights06/02/22 12:14 PM
-20

I'm not sure women have changed that much. Many are still looking for families and relationships. And I'm not sure what debauchery you're worried about. Are women having too much sex now? Or is it the type of sex they have that you feel is debauchery? Also, what 'male attitude' are women emulating and why don't you like it?
/r/MensRights06/02/22 11:40 AM
-17

Anyone that tweets kill all men is an idiot. But the only time I ever see it is when I specifically search Twitter for it. And it's mostly troll accounts. Are there any high profile people still saying this today? Or are we just constantly letting trolls troll us?
/r/MensRights06/02/22 11:37 AM
0

Did society take down Canadian truckers by making them get vaccinated? Because if so, you can add doctors, nurses, teachers, first responders and all the other groups they made get vaccinated.
/r/MensRights06/02/22 11:29 AM
-17

What were traditional women like?
/r/MensRights06/02/22 11:12 AM
-11

Most women love men. Most women marry men. Most women have children with men. Most women retire with men. There's some man haters out there. But it's a small bit of the population now just like it was 40 years ago.
/r/MensRights06/02/22 12:34 AM
-3

The top 4 comments are supportive of the post. And 2 are oddly just calling women fat for some reason... but yeah, I'm sure it has nothing to do with misogyny. Calling women fat and saying they used to be prettier isn't related to disliking women at all.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 09:13 PM
-3

Yeah, although it seems the overwhelming majority think you're wrong about this being misogyny and it's one of the most upvoted posts today. Seems everyone was just waiting for the chance to say what they really think of women and this crazed lunatic have them an opening. Yikes.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 08:41 PM
-6

You're finally catching up to me mate!
/r/MensRights05/02/22 07:56 PM
-9

So I post the OBVIOUS lie in OPs post...and I'm the liar? Bold move.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 02:28 PM
-10

Oh. Well it had 90 upvotes and was one of the most upvoted posts. Then it was removed for being obviously hateful. And when I called it out for being obviously hateful, you can see my downvotes. I even quoted the comment so you can see how hateful it was.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 02:01 PM
2

We will never know. But assuming she was hired without proper qualifications because of her race...is racist.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 01:55 PM
-28

That removed comment was removed because it was hateful towards women. It had triple the upvotes this post did. As you can clearly see.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 01:53 PM
0

I see. So when a minority is sub par you just assume diversity hire. When a white person is subpar what do you blame it on?
/r/MensRights05/02/22 01:48 PM
-34

I don't understand your point. I called out an obvious double standard so I can't call out the obvious lie in this post?
/r/MensRights05/02/22 01:47 PM
-11

What’s even worse is that these are the men that they consistently choose to date, and go back to! Who is 'they'?
/r/MensRights05/02/22 01:29 PM
0

I don't think anyone should be assumed to be a diversity hire based on their race. And I think people who make those racist assumptions should be called out. It's very unfair for minorities to be assumed as less qualified because of racism.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 01:23 PM
-52

The highly-upvoted post in question: This has 335 comments on it and 31 upvotes. That's INCREDIBLY low in terms of upvotes. Did you feel lying would make your post more credible?
/r/MensRights05/02/22 01:16 PM
6

Are you asking me if I would think its childish for feminists to post 'men are fat now'...then yes. That's obviously childish.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 01:13 PM
-3

Yeah. You can. You just have to be ready for someone to divorce you if they have an issue with it
/r/MensRights05/02/22 01:08 PM
7

Who does a woman need approval from to work or stay home?
/r/MensRights05/02/22 12:58 PM
0

We date decent feminine women with good looks. Money comes secondary. What makes a women feminine?
/r/MensRights05/02/22 12:43 PM
-5

Yeah, she's racist too. Agreed.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 12:24 PM
0

Right. This person was suggesting it mattered to men. I don't get that. I wanted more clarity on why they don't want a debate as to who makes more money.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 12:20 PM
33

If women want to work, they should work. If they want to stay at home, they should stay at home. People should choose their own life path and not be told what to do by society. That's obvious to everyone.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 12:19 PM
-33

And if a white person was teaching those classes, it's because they know their material. But you took one look at the colour of this person's skin and you just knew that she does not have the credentials? And you're up to date on the credentials of foreign universities? Doesn't sound like she did University in English by your description. Yeah... that sounds kind of racist. Are you sure it's not racist?
/r/MensRights05/02/22 12:04 PM
-28

Isn't assuming someone was a diversity hire based on their looks racist AF?
/r/MensRights05/02/22 11:53 AM
1

We’re dating women for mainly for their looks the qualities we seek in a high quality women. We aren’t dating their degrees, and men certainly don’t want to debate about who’s making the most money. What does it matter who makes the most money?
/r/MensRights05/02/22 11:42 AM
-16

Did she say she was a diversity hire? How do you know?
/r/MensRights05/02/22 11:31 AM
7

All humans did. Pathetically trying to pin it on women alone is just childish men that have open issues with women.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 11:30 AM
-10

First no it isnt Second, it doesn't matter and attempting to insult women like that is so petty and sad.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 11:08 AM
-6

While your post is one of few reasonable ones, I think your smart enough to see how much misogyny and issues with women are obvious here. And for it to be so upvoted so quickly... not a positive sign.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 11:06 AM
-49

I really do envy you for the the in which you lived. I feel this age is far better. Women do what they want instead of what they are told they should do. They have careers, education, and ambition. They are more open with their sexuality and they don't spend as much time talking about what society wants them to be. They be who they want. I believe that's vastly superior.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 10:57 AM
14

'I don't like women today' is not a valid discussion. Just like 'men are trash' is not a valid discussion.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 10:55 AM
-24

The immaturity of calling women obese for no reason really highlights toxicity in attitudes towards women.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 10:48 AM
-32

Why do so many 50 year olds know so many young women? Are you just judging all women by social media posts or is there online chats for old men to get to know young women?
/r/MensRights05/02/22 10:41 AM
-21

Does dystopian future seem a bit hyperbolic to anyone else? If you dislike women today SO much that you feel we live in a dystopia, you really do have some issues that should be addressed. Why is the world a dystopia just because this guy doesn't like young women?
/r/MensRights05/02/22 10:40 AM
3

How dare you make a comment that's equal. Insulting women will get you upvotes. This balanced and equal approach, instant downvotes... Wow...
/r/MensRights05/02/22 10:24 AM
12

This entire post is embarrassing garbage. Women are fat, women shouldn't have tattoos, women shouldn't be lesbians, women shouldn't have short hair. This is exactly the shit you see on TwoX telling men how to live and making huge generalizations. Someone delete this.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 10:21 AM
0

You say you don't like feminists, but anyone acting exactly like them must respect them a little bit.
/r/MensRights04/02/22 06:08 PM
-8

All rape laws could be misused. Did you want to just legalize rape altogether for that reason? I certainly hope not.
/r/MensRights04/02/22 02:12 AM
-5

I'm glad you mentioned that she was a feminist. I was worried this post would have nothing to do with feminism.
/r/MensRights04/02/22 01:48 AM
-17

I don't think my views on whining about women are related to feminist ideologies at all.
/r/MensRights04/02/22 01:22 AM
-19

Nope. I believe in equal rights for everyone. I just think whining about women doesn't have anything to do with mens rights.
/r/MensRights04/02/22 01:13 AM
-22

I don't think whining about women and how they act is a good look for the mens rights movement.
/r/MensRights04/02/22 12:12 AM
1

https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/explained-debate-over-marital-rape-7732470/
/r/MensRights03/02/22 11:43 PM
-1

There are rape laws in place. However there is an exception for when it's your wife. Removing that exception is what they want to do. It doesn't change burden of proof at all. It's all the same burden of proof for all rapes. The exception will just no longer be there.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 11:35 PM
-2

The burden of proof is exactly the same as their current rape laws. Burden of proof isn't related to this conversation at all since no one wants to change it.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 11:22 PM
-6

Is saying 'I am against a law making it illegal to rape your wife' really that much different than 'it's okay to rape women'?
/r/MensRights03/02/22 11:05 PM
-1

Agreed. They should. But allowing rapes to happen while you wait for that day is disgusting.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 10:57 PM
0

Striking down an exception is not a new law. It's removal of an old law. One that makes rape legal. So defending that law is messed up.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 10:48 PM
-1

No it isn't. It's striking down an exception for rape for when you are married.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 10:46 PM
-1

I mean there was no marriage strike regarding unfair laws that have been in place forever. And as soon as they were making marital rape illegal, marriage strike. Why not protest the laws unrelated to women? Why wait until someone is helping women to be upset? It's a weird coincidence isn't it?
/r/MensRights03/02/22 10:36 PM
-1

You should protest so that it raises awareness. Instead of just protesting when someone tries to help women. Silence for decades, they try to make marital rape illegal... and protests. Yikes.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 10:28 PM
1

Laws take months to pass. Striking down this exception could be done in days.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 10:23 PM
-5

No. I hope they pass laws about raping husband's tomorrow. Until then, I don't want women raped.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 10:17 PM
-15

Right. This will put men in jail. Men who rape their wives who currently can do it all they want. Are you really standing up for men that are raping their wives? Really?
/r/MensRights03/02/22 09:46 PM
-7

No one wants the protesting to stop. Finding out who is okay with women being raped is an incredibly useful tool in society.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 09:44 PM
-13

According to the IPC, a man is said to commit "rape" if he inserts his penis, uses his mouth, any body part or any other object in a woman's vagina, mouth, anus or urethra or makes her do any of the above to him or anybody else under the following conditions: against her will; against her consent
/r/MensRights03/02/22 09:38 PM
-15

which have much lower standards of proof and longer sentences to weaponize against men It's literally the EXACT same burden of proof as all other rapes. The law in India says that rape is when you have sex without consent. But there's an exception for when it's your wife as you are allowed to rape her. And when they try to remove that exception that allows women to be legally raped...MRAs are supporting it? WtF?
/r/MensRights03/02/22 09:34 PM
6

Seems like all the man hate on social media is a problem. Specifically leabians doing it is a weird caviat.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 01:26 PM
-2

How do you know they are lesbians?
/r/MensRights03/02/22 12:51 PM
-13

I'm not sure that's true. Marijuana is legal in many states now. But I suppose if you want to find a way to make men the victim in this story, that's a good an angle as any.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 11:08 AM
-11

The article says things like this happen all the time and no one is arrested. America is a mess.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 11:01 AM
-17

All men have preferences and most men don't feel shame for them. I would suggest finding out who is making you feel shame and cut them out of your life.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 10:55 AM
0

Male or female, you have to ask your partner for consent when engaging in intercourse. And you can't take the condom off without telling your partner. These laws aren't draconian. With the number of men that are forced to penetrate, consent laws are vital.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 10:43 AM
-33

Dating someone significantly less mature and developed IS creepier than dating someone significantly more mature and developed. Not my relationship and not my business, but pretending they are exactly the same is weird. They aren't. One is creepier. Regardless of the genders involved.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 10:34 AM
-8

This was not published in any newspaper in the world. Because it's dumb and newspapers are better than that.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 01:21 AM
-12

So you really do blame feminism every time a woman does something you don't like? Because...that's messed up.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 12:15 AM
-18

Does this count as feminists because it's a woman doing it? Feminists and women are different groups.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 10:26 PM
0

I'm not sure what you're saying. Are you saying all murders of men are hate crimes. Because that's not really how they work.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 10:22 PM
1

It doesn't. It increases their threat to society and so therefore they need to be removed from society for longer.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 08:48 PM
-2

No. Women and men being murdered carry the same penalty. However if you're deemed to have killed a woman solely because you hate women, it's it's longer penalty. They are basing it on motives. Not the victim of the gender. Like all hate crime laws.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 06:16 PM
-8

This was tweeted by a pro-male organization on Twitter. Doesn't really have much to do with feminism.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 05:54 PM
-3

Or men that specifically target women are being treated as more dangerous.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 05:04 PM
0

And you think those people should be charged with hate crimes? Because they targeted white people?
/r/MensRights02/02/22 04:31 PM
1

Motives are a lot more complex than a check mark in a box at the crime scene. But if you think its a real problem than it's obviously a worthy endeavor to support that cause.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 02:49 PM
1

When you consider most killers are men, it does seem less probable. But there could be men that hate other men and lash out. It's something to consider depending on the circumstances of the murder.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 02:39 PM
-8

Right. No one knows motives and speculating is pointless. That's my point. Assuming it's because women dont want beta males is.... dumb.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 02:32 PM
-2

This is about women murdered specifically because they are women. Not just any woman murdered. I don't think you understand the point of the statistics. The motives are determined by a jury. As always. If you don't think that's a fair system, we have bigger problems.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 02:31 PM
1

The same reason they shouldn't collect data on hoe many victims are left handed. It's unlikely to find a correlation.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 02:29 PM
1

If anyone was killed because they hate heterosexual, they SHOULD receive a harsher sentence. Because they will reoffend. I agree. But I don't believe that's something that happens.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 02:27 PM
-7

Doesn't that depend on femicide rates? Something unknown which is why they are starting to track it. You're saying there isn't a problem and the government is saying we want to collect data to see if there is a problem. Isn't monitoring statistics a better approach than just shoving your head in the sand and saying there isn't an issue without any statistical analysis being done? Denying a problem exists without gathering data is obviously a horrible approach. I would think you're educated enoug…
/r/MensRights02/02/22 12:55 PM
-17

I read that men are more likely to abuse women when they make more money than them. Maybe that's the reason women leave those relationships. Evidence
/r/MensRights02/02/22 12:42 PM
18

Women have been fooled by feminism into overwriting their basic biological imperative, now placing them in traditionally male, stressful environments which decimate their fertility and destroy their mental health. And men can't even get a career off the ground, which means that most women won't even look at them. Isn't this just a wordy way of saying women belong at home and it's unfair to men that women are in the workplace? Because thats some tradcon BS. Everyone should choose their life path.…
/r/MensRights02/02/22 12:24 PM
-11

Agreed. But all murders of women will not be classified as femicide. The article doesn't say that.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 11:46 AM
-1

The point of incarceration is rehabilitation. Crimes should have different penalties based on how long rehabilitation will take.. And anger management is easier to learn than unlearning hate
/r/MensRights02/02/22 11:41 AM
-1

So you agree that every rape can be classified as true or false? It's not possible that some rapes they just don't know what happened? That makes sense to you? Really?
/r/MensRights02/02/22 10:49 AM
-2

Post fake statistics and then just name call when someone asks you about them. But it's feminists that push propaganda?
/r/MensRights02/02/22 10:40 AM
-2

I guess discussing my point became too challenging. So just call me a feminist and say I justify males being raped and call me a bunch of names. How mature.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 10:39 AM
-7

I believe the number one reason that girls file a rape report is because they were raped. There is no evidence to suggest more than half the rapes reported didn't happen. So most rapes are reported, because they were raped.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 10:05 AM
-18

So if someone kills someone because they are cheating on them and another person kills someone because they hate gay people...you don't think the person that hates gay people should be given extra tine due to their blatant hate? Because I do. They are both scum. But the person that hates gay people is worse.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 10:03 AM
0

What law is changing about that? That's messed up.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 10:00 AM
-1

"The report says that between April 2013 and July 2014, of the 2,753 complaints of rape, only 1,287 cases were found to be true, and the remaining 1,464 cases were found to be false" Classifying rapes as true or false depending on conviction or acquittal is a terrible way to collect data. I get that the statistics say what you want them to but everyone can agree this statistic is garbage. If using this method of data collection, cosby was falsely accused because he wasn't convicted.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 09:58 AM
-3

Has there been cases in Spain of men being killed because of their gender? If so, they should make this neutral.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 09:53 AM
-2

They would get the same justice they get now. This changed literally nothing for the families of murdered male victims.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 09:52 AM
-30

Hate crime laws like this exist because people that murder based on race, gender, sexuality, or religion are significantly more likely to reoffend. So they do more time. It's not because some victims lives are more important than others.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 01:30 AM
-1

So you think universities, the justice system, parliaments, social workers, and charities are all evil organizations? Life must be exhausting for you.
/r/MensRights01/02/22 01:28 PM
-4

the axiom that men have been happy to beat, rape, oppress, suppress, and enslave the people with whom they have their closest emotional bonds and not interpret that as a belief that men are psychotic. No one thinks though. This is your interpretation so you can feel like you're being villainized. Ask 1000 people on the street if they are feminists, 500 say no. Ask 1000 if they think men are rapists that oppress and rape women, 1000 say no. Might be time to chill out with the 'the entire world ha…
/r/MensRights01/02/22 01:14 PM
-6

If someone believes that: Society is Male Dominated Male dominance privileges men over women While some men can sometimes be harmed by this system, the system itself is set up to privilege men and subjugate women for mens express benefit. But does every feminist believe that. Has everyone one done the hundreds of hours of research you have and drawn that very same conclusion? Do you have any reason to believe that EVERY feminist believes that? Or do most feminists just believe that women often f…
/r/MensRights01/02/22 12:57 PM
-4

But every feminist doesn't think men are psychopaths. In fact almost none do. Yours is the same logic as saying every Christian thinks gay marriage is wrong. We know the interpretation in many churches. But very few Christians still believe homosexuality is a sin. Because ideologies evolve.
/r/MensRights01/02/22 12:37 PM
0

Do you believe it's sexist for men to have preferences based on facial symmetry, breast size, nose shape, or any other features that people view as objectively pretty or not? Preferences aren't the problem. The advertisement is the problem. If you only want to date men over 6 feet, you do you. Stating it as though men under 6 feet aren't worth your time is the dick move. If I really like women with big boobs, I have every God given right to pursue that. But I don't make women with small boobs fe…
/r/MensRights01/02/22 12:33 PM
-5

Many view the manosphere as a hate movement. I still don't have a problem with 90 percent of people in that movement.
/r/MensRights01/02/22 11:57 AM
-14

Are entitlement and exploitation infamously female traits though? What typically female trait are those things an example of? Aren't those just things women do that you don't like? What makes those actions inherently female?
/r/MensRights01/02/22 11:39 AM
-5

I have no issue with 90 percent of feminists and criticism of feminism should not be seen as a criticism of all feminists.
/r/MensRights01/02/22 11:25 AM
5

Meh, I think when men and women are hammered and sleep together, they are both idiots. But with the way society operates, men need to be more careful and men should get that speech from a male role model. Men have more to lose so men need to be more aware. It sucks, but it's true. She was shifting the onus to men which is flawed, but I think the criminal onus will always be on men and therefore men should be aware and careful. So no it's not just the man's fault when 2 drunk people hook up, but …
/r/MensRights01/02/22 10:33 AM
0

Some women not wanting to date short people and not being able to say women are trash. Isn't really rights I'm concerned with. I don't want to date superficial women and I don't want to say women are trash.
/r/MensRights01/02/22 10:26 AM
-19

I think few people know what toxic femininity is. Even I don't. What feminine behaviours are seen in such high concentration that they become toxic?
/r/MensRights01/02/22 10:24 AM
-7

That wasn't anywhere in the picture you posted. But it's definitely a dumb thing to say as most men aren't.
/r/MensRights01/02/22 10:21 AM
-9

She specifically said that she was saying it WASNT rape. So I don't really think she's saying men are rapists for sleeping either drunk girls.
/r/MensRights01/02/22 10:17 AM
1

Suggesting men don't have sex with very drunk women is really good advice. It's way too risky to have sex with a woman that is very drunk.
/r/MensRights01/02/22 10:05 AM
-5

No. Original comment did
/r/MensRights31/01/22 01:10 PM
-2

Right. But the link was about this particular case and calling this woman a false accuser.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 01:09 PM
-26

True. Asking recovering alcoholics if they want to go for a drink is rough. And complaining about it wouldn't be misandry.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 01:06 PM
-33

It was cut off where it was for a reason. So everyone can get their 2 Minutes of hate for TwoX. Every boyfriend I’ve had that I confided in about this has taken advantage of it. To them it’s a gift, a woman who’s ravenous and literally can’t say no to what they ask of me? They must be dreaming. They don’t get how torturous to have to fight these feelings and how degrading it is to be treated like they do.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 01:02 PM
-5

Exactly. Ot has nothing to do with gender. Just biological sex. So how can a doctor diagnose gender?
/r/MensRights31/01/22 12:53 PM
-9

Right. And OP called her a false accuser and thats a poor choice. No different than calling someone a rapist after they are charged.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 12:45 PM
-31

The original post says the boyfriends she tells about this problem push her to do things that she feels shame for later. Complaining about boyfriends taking advantage of your mental illness isn't really misandry is it?
/r/MensRights31/01/22 12:42 PM
-14

That's true. You can still call men charged with rape rapists. You don't need a conviction to say that and to support the alleged victim. I just think it's a bad idea.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 12:29 PM
-8

This woman was never convicted of a false allegation because she killed herself before the trial. She was being charged with perverting the course of justice. Assuming she is guilty without a trial is probably not the best approach. No one should be assumed guilty without a trial.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 12:21 PM
-17

Well this was cringe to read.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 11:29 AM
-4

So, answering your question, I think both involved should bear the consequences. Maybe that will teach somebody something.People should become more responsible not less. So make abortion illegal, make adoption illegal, no paper abortions. And let millions of babies be born into homes that are in no way prepared for a child. And by ruining those 3 lives, we hope that other people see how horrible it is, and learn lessons through other people's mistakes. Seems kind of dark to me.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 11:27 AM
-8

She said there was public concern that trans rights and female rights have conflicting issues. That's not what a TERF is. There's obviously public concern of that. Read any comments on a MtF athlete competing against women. Stating the obvious fact that the public is concerned with this debate is not anti trans. That said, the law in question is that any person can declare their own gender without a diagnosis and I am 100 percent for that. Doctors don't know what gender you are better than you d…
/r/MensRights31/01/22 11:03 AM
-10

Right. So basically NO ONE should have consequences. Just seems like the opposite of the comment that you should have to deal with the consequences.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 10:52 AM
-7

Want to just fuck? Okay, but precautions and consequences are up to you. People need to be prepared for the consequences. That's true. And yet many argue that men should be able to sign a document and walk away from thr consequences altogether. Do you think that men should have to endure thr consequences of getting someone pregnant or they should be allowed to just remove all consequences and walk away?
/r/MensRights31/01/22 10:30 AM
-3

No sane man marries a western woman given promiscuity and biased laws What is the issue with promiscuity?
/r/MensRights31/01/22 10:27 AM
-2

According to kesha, she took pills given to her by Dr Luke and blacked out. She woke up naked in his hotel room the following day. She was 19 years old and he was 33 and her employer in a strange city where she had no family or friends. Might not be rape. But it's certainly gross behaviour.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 10:18 AM
2

How do you know how many soldiers are feminists. There are likely many male feminists that are serving in armies and many that have died in war. Are you saying feminists prefer the kitchen? Or women?
/r/MensRights31/01/22 10:13 AM
-7

What makes you think a culture that is more tolerant of a woman being hit would fare better in a war? Is there any reason to believe men that prioritize women over men are any less able to fight in wars?
/r/MensRights30/01/22 06:02 PM
11

While there are obvious discrepancies in the justice system. Taking two stories and comparing them doesn't make that much sense. As can be seen here And here And here And here Men are ruled criminally not responsible too. The difference is in sentencing OVERALL that matters. Individual cases can be influenced by one judge or one prosecutor or one mental health professional. The overall is what tells the story.
/r/MensRights30/01/22 03:22 PM
-1

But isn't that exactly the same bull shit we complain about with feminism? Should we be exactly like the people we are against?
/r/MensRights30/01/22 02:41 PM
1

So you disagree with the mens rights movement because it's specific to men? They only fight for one group and you've made it clear you don't believe thats okay.
/r/MensRights30/01/22 02:37 PM
-3

So feminism isn't for equality because they have never fought for equality for men? Is mens rights against equality because they have never fought for equality for women? Your logic is heavily flawed. Is black lives matter against equality because they have never fought for white people? You can be for equality and only focus on one group.
/r/MensRights30/01/22 02:22 PM
-10

So when a man marries a woman and she ends up making a false allegation against him, it's his fault for choosing her and putting out? This is just pure victim blaming right? Why?
/r/MensRights30/01/22 02:17 PM
-2

It's possible that the hundreds of millions of feminists that see feminism as equality are wrong. Hundreds of millions of them being male. But it's also possible you evaluate feminism by the extreme examples of hate and not by the core principles of its followers.
/r/MensRights30/01/22 02:11 PM
-6

If you compare this to the message of modern feminism, which is taught wholesale throughout society, there is no comparison. According to them men don't have value. Men are evil and are to blame for every ill society has. This is not the message most people get from feminism. The vast majority of the population believes feminism is about equality. How can such a huge portion of people all get the opposite opinion of feminism that you have? What can possibly drive you to be so confident that it i…
/r/MensRights30/01/22 01:48 PM
-25

Do you also blame men that are constantly rejected on dating apps because they are clearly 'shooting out of their league'?
/r/MensRights30/01/22 01:03 PM
-41

There's no stat that says most women have crazy demand or that women encourage ghosting.
/r/MensRights30/01/22 12:52 PM
1

I think thr knee jerk reaction of 'this is women's fault' when that obviously isn't isn't case should be called out. People flock and give upvotes without ever having to answer the question 'how is this woman's fault'. It's a concerning mindset to mindlessly blame women for something that isn't there fault and I believe that notion should be challenged.
/r/MensRights30/01/22 12:52 PM
-59

Most men and women on dating apps are very reasonable people that just want to start communication with people outside of their day to day life. Most women don't have crazy demands, most men arent playboys looking to lie to women, and women do not encourage eachother to ghost men. Your views of what dating apps are like seem like someone that just reads horror stories about dating apps and has never actually been on one.
/r/MensRights30/01/22 12:47 PM
-3

Lol. Link to a time you called out misogyny please. I would be very impressed.
/r/MensRights30/01/22 12:10 PM
-13

Do you think 'MRA posts like the rest of us' are posting mean generalizations about women? Because if so.... yikes.
/r/MensRights30/01/22 11:51 AM
-1

Yeah, but you said "It's not the dating apps that bring out the worst in men, it's the women on those dating apps." You didn't say women pick men that are already the worst. You said women bring out the worst in them. Which implies it's something women are doing wrong that leads to men treating them badly. Did you mean to say 'women choose men that are already the worst and then don't like the outcome' or something like that? And do you think women should start matching with more unattractive gu…
/r/MensRights30/01/22 11:49 AM
-8

Right. But how is it women's fault that the men on there are 'the worst'? When a woman chooses a man if he is 'the worst' and treats her poorly, how is it her fault?
/r/MensRights30/01/22 11:46 AM
1

360 would mean I'm back where I started.
/r/MensRights30/01/22 11:44 AM
4

I did an experiment. I got Tinder gold and set my preferences to all genders. After one day, I got 30 likes from women and only one of them was attractive. And all she was doing was promoting her OnlyFans. 30 women and you found them all unattractive? Is it possible your standards are too high? It would be ironic complaining that women's standards are too high while simultaneously saying EVERY woman that liked your profile wasn't good enough for you. You deserved to be made fun of for this nonse…
/r/MensRights30/01/22 11:43 AM
-15

Does Jordan Peterson encourage sweeping generalizations about women like Women are extremely sensitive and downright tyrannical. And Women really do get threatened when somebody challenges the gynocentric status quo. I assumed Jordan peterson had more sense than that and avoided making such mass generalizations. I've never actually seen anything but I imagine he's smart enough to make his beef with gyocentric society, not just targeting women with insults because he would come off as a misogynis…
/r/MensRights30/01/22 11:39 AM
-27

How exactly are women in dating apps brining out the worst in men by choosing partners? I get that you feel it's women's fault but how do you feel it's women's fault? What are they specifically doing to bring out the worst in men?
/r/MensRights30/01/22 11:29 AM
0

The 10 percent 90 percent thing is such BS. If you have a good personality, you will find someone. You won't be picking a different girl every night, but you shouldn't want to anyway. The desperate need to blame women for your struggles in dating instead of just keeping your head up and focusing on you isn't healthy and it only magnifies the problem. If you blame women for your problems with women, that resentment will make you far worse with women because it can make your attitude toxic. Compla…
/r/MensRights30/01/22 11:27 AM
9

She told me that MRA is against feminism and when I said "I didnt know that, but if thats the case, I'm more a feminist then", Being anti feminist is an integral part of being an MRA according to anyone other than mens lib.
/r/MensRights30/01/22 11:13 AM
6

Well, there are significantly more male murderers. And murder is very gendered in terms of who is committing it. You can't really just claim the opposite when all the stats prove that wrong. Did you actually not know this or are you just trying to peddle misinformation.
/r/MensRights30/01/22 03:45 AM
-3

Lol. No one thinks all men oppress all women. Some homeless man isn't oppressing Oprah. That's not even close to what feminists think. Lol.
/r/MensRights29/01/22 08:54 PM
1

If you're confident, we could arrest them and charge them. But I still think it would be better to have evidence before convicting someone.
/r/MensRights29/01/22 06:07 PM
-1

If the people here are so reasonable, why are the 'reverse feminism' comments so upvoted and mine so downvoted? Kinda seems exactly the same as feminist subs to me.
/r/MensRights29/01/22 06:07 PM
0

Of course people accused of rape. Only a psychopath would want to lock people up without evidence.
/r/MensRights29/01/22 05:51 PM
-1

'Grievances' is a pretty broad term. Complaining about unequal treatment in child custody is valid Complaining that women are selfish and narcissistic and only want to date assholes is not valid and it should be called out.
/r/MensRights29/01/22 05:30 PM
-4

Complaining about women has become a focal point and the mods can't get to all the 'here's another thing I don't like about women' posts right away. And people latch on because deep down that's what many of the people here want. As can be seen here
/r/MensRights29/01/22 03:43 PM
-6

Why not just call them witches and see if they sink in the ocean? Evidence must be there. Your push to charge people without evidence is messed up.
/r/MensRights29/01/22 03:37 PM
2

If 'the clear' is you need evidence to lock lock up. Yes. Yes I do. Innocent until proven guilty is pretty important.
/r/MensRights29/01/22 03:32 PM
1

I guess the justice system can just use you to listen to everyone's story and decide who is lying and who is telling the truth. No evidence required. Just lock people up based on their ability to tell a story. You realize how foolish that is right?
/r/MensRights29/01/22 03:32 PM
-6

Yeah. If there is evidence they are false accusers, they should go to jail. But there isn't any evidence.
/r/MensRights29/01/22 03:25 PM
1

Not sure I understand your point. I believe there needs to be evidence to arrest someone for a false accusation. Do you disagree? I think all crimes require evidence to charge someone.
/r/MensRights29/01/22 03:24 PM
3

Yes. I do oppose that. It doesn't make sense.
/r/MensRights29/01/22 03:00 PM
2

So you trusted the word of the alleged assailants spouse over your own child and that's common sense to you? Wow.
/r/MensRights29/01/22 02:56 PM
-45

Right, but do you have any evidence that they lied? Or is this a guilty until proven innocent situation that men are accustomed to? You'd think people supportive of men's rights would want innocent until proven guilty...
/r/MensRights29/01/22 02:54 PM
3

Yes, and an investigation to follow. Are you saying children that accuse adults of inappropriate behaviour should be ignored? Wtf?
/r/MensRights29/01/22 02:33 PM
-13

So you want to imprison these men without any evidence they committed a crime? And that feels like a step forward in mens rights to you? Really?
/r/MensRights29/01/22 02:32 PM
1

Lol. So you really don't see a difference between 4 people with proven contact claiming abuse and an anonymous internet person claiming abuse This is embarrassing for you.
/r/MensRights29/01/22 02:23 PM
0

I don't know what you're trying to say here. I believe male victims of violence should be supported, not arrested without evidence. I can't understand why this is a controversial take.
/r/MensRights29/01/22 02:19 PM
-21

Nah, it's a failed point your trying to prove. If 4 people in real life accused me of pedophilia it would very the same. The ramblings of an anonymous stranger are a but different. Trying to say they are the same makes me think you don't really understand this at all.
/r/MensRights29/01/22 02:05 PM
-114

No investigation needed, you didn't like his story so let's lock him up for decades for making false allegations. This is why male victims are dismissed. People don't care about men.
/r/MensRights29/01/22 01:56 PM
-18

Did they even investigate? Or did they just see it was male victims and dismiss it altogether as the justice system does?
/r/MensRights29/01/22 01:46 PM
-7

50 years ago, when women were 100 percent reliant on their spouse, or in countries where that still exists now, domestic violence rates were and are much higher. That power dynamic really allows abuse to go unnoticed and silence victims. So a patriarchal society absolutely creates more abuse. That's obvious to everyone. Luckily, our society is a billion times less patriarchal than it was 50 years ago.
/r/MensRights29/01/22 01:45 PM
-186

This wasn't a false accusation. There's no evidence the boys lied. Just no evidence that he did it. Putting 4 men in jail for decades because they reported abuse that MIGHT not have been true is pretty dark and not very supportive of male victims.
/r/MensRights29/01/22 01:41 PM
-21

Quotes from comments on this post alone: "Until men start telling women to stop being selfish, they'll continue to act that way." "It's not your fault women are entitled" "women don't want to be treated equally. They want more. They don't care how. And if you deny them they'll find something to damage you." "Women want the perks of being a man will maintaining their perks of having a vagina" And we still wonder why people think this sub is misogynistic? It's the fact that these comments are upvo…
/r/MensRights29/01/22 01:33 PM
0

I think you'll find too many people here want to see white people as being the victims for an article about racism against black people to get much traction. As one can see from this top comment
/r/MensRights29/01/22 01:02 PM
-34

The fact that four men made these allegations against him and it still wasn't enough to convict him is proof how the justice system does not take male victims seriously.
/r/MensRights29/01/22 12:50 PM
-13

I don't think ANY feminist believes that men hitting women is an attempt to support the patriarchy. They believe men hitting women is a SYMPTOM of the patriarchy. No man gets mad at his wife and says 'I'll support the patriarchy by hitting her'. That doesn't exist and no feminist thinks that. He just hits her. And that hit, reinforces to that woman that she is controlled by a man. Which is a symptom of the feminist theory of patriarchy. This is akin to saying someone with covid is coughing to su…
/r/MensRights29/01/22 12:41 PM
5

But out of all that, didn't you get a daughter that you love?
/r/MensRights29/01/22 03:35 AM
-20

The system isn't rigged because the women you claim are so terrible aren't interested in you. Your attitude is toxic. That's the problem. Not your height. Your bank account. Your lifestyle. Or your clothes. It's your attitude. It's bad and misogynistic.
/r/MensRights29/01/22 12:43 AM
-12

I think a lot of issues likely come from your clear disdain for women and victim complex. Many can pick up on that sort of thing.
/r/MensRights29/01/22 12:26 AM
-2

Right. And I think giving people a fair and honest shot makes more sense than blindly being led by statistics. When it comes to employment passion matters fare more than statistics.
/r/MensRights28/01/22 01:24 PM
-1

So even though a man may have spent his whole life dreaming of being a vet. He has to be assumed as lesser because other men don't want to be vets. He is far more qualified...however it's fair to assume otherwise because of what's between his legs. I disagree.
/r/MensRights28/01/22 12:55 PM
-3

Yes.
/r/MensRights28/01/22 12:54 PM
1

There aren't. And there should be.
/r/MensRights28/01/22 12:44 PM
1

Right. So you feel it is fair to say men are less qualified humanb resources managers or vetrinarians and assuming they are less qualified in the hiring process is fair? Because that seems wrong to me.
/r/MensRights28/01/22 12:40 PM
-3

Doesn't the prosecution drag it out? It's not really the alleged victim that controls how the prosecution works.
/r/MensRights28/01/22 12:29 PM
1

Women make up 66 percent of university applicants. So by your logic, men aren't as capable as women because you're pulling from a smaller talent pool. Are you comfortable saying men are less capable in the majority of university graduate fields? Or is it only women yiu feel that way about?
/r/MensRights28/01/22 12:20 PM
6

That's why I said the comments aren't representative of this sub.
/r/MensRights28/01/22 12:12 PM
-6

Right but is there evidence of that? Or have you just decided women in stem are less qualified because that's what you decided was true? Women in stem being less qualified is a bold accusation. Can you defend it? Or is it just you don't like women and you FEEL they aren't qualified?
/r/MensRights28/01/22 12:04 PM
-9

This sounds a lot like you are saying the current definition of abuse is wrong and you want to make things that qualify as abuse now not qualify as abuse. Do you believe men convicted of abuse should have their convictions overturned because many of them weren't real abuse? Doesn't that sound a bit crazy to you? Or are you saying the layman's use of 'abuse' is wrong and the legal definition is fine?
/r/MensRights28/01/22 12:03 PM
-36

Do employers often run into situations where there are no qualified women? That would be a very small fraction of employers that would have to deal with that. Women are 66 percent of graduates. Their qualifications are as good as mens in most scenarios
/r/MensRights28/01/22 11:54 AM
-37

No one is obligated to hire someone that is unqualified.
/r/MensRights28/01/22 10:35 AM
-16

Often times, what people see from this sub is the misogynistic comments that are posted in other subs. So yes there are hateful people here, but there is also valid information. It's very unfair for an entire sub to be represented by misogynist views that don't represent the majority of the sub. Much like it's unfair to judge all feminists based on some angry misandrist tweet.
/r/MensRights28/01/22 10:30 AM
6

Harvey weinstein isn't really a mens issue. It's more of a rapist issue. And most men aren't rapists.
/r/MensRights28/01/22 10:19 AM
-66

Every company is itching to be more diverse because they are underrepresented when it comes to women. If women are so underrepresented in companies, is it really an advantage to be a woman? If women had an advantage wouldn't they be equal in companies at least?
/r/MensRights28/01/22 10:18 AM
-10

Mens rights is just about equal rights but everyone assumes its about misogyny. Just like feminism is about equal rights but many assume it's about misandry. Those committing misogyny in mens rights groups aren't real mens rights activists.
/r/MensRights28/01/22 10:13 AM
-12

Did they actually say they had it worse than men? Or were they just out protesting for their safety and you took that personally? Different people support different things. These women chose to try and help improve women's safety at night. If you're offended by women trying to improve their safety, life must be exhausting.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 08:28 PM
-25

This seems very 'men have it worse so how dare women organize and try to deal with assaults on women.' The take back the night March was about pushing society to do better at protecting women walking at night. Something we all want. So why be mad that women arranged that?
/r/MensRights27/01/22 07:40 PM
-13

I think a lot of people are uncomfortable with the idea of police taking the phones of someone and going through them because they reported a crime. If 16 year old boys being molested by their teacher knew their phones would be confiscated and searched, they may be less likely to report their victimization. That's a rough violation of privacy that many would find embarrassing.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 06:51 PM
-2

Ansari is the creator. He chose not to be in it. Are you saying he fired himself based on false allegations?
/r/MensRights27/01/22 01:03 PM
7

But the moment they beat a woman feminists will just eat them alive instead of protecting him Uhhh...yes? Do you think feminists should protect those that assault women? Wtf? Should MRAs protect men that hit women if they are MRas? Obviously not. That's crazy. There's no advantages to siding with feminists, they'll turn on you in an instant. Siding with feminists doesn't mean you can assault women. Is that the advantage you feel Okeefe should have?
/r/MensRights27/01/22 12:50 PM
-5

All the examples found were men too. Can men be judged by this group of trouble makers? Or just feminists?
/r/MensRights27/01/22 12:29 PM
1

If you compare victimization surveys to the number of men charged with rape it's pretty clear the odds of being jailed for rape are incredibly low. That's math. But I guess that limits your ability to claim to be the victim and so you want to push back on that math.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 12:27 PM
-24

So no, there isn't any reason to assume me feminists commit more crimes than non feminists and no, you don't have any proof to back up that claim The number of people that think their feelings can be said as facts is too Damm high.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 12:23 PM
0

Right. Which is why I assumed 50 50 to be fair. Did you think most rapes reported are false and it's higher than 50?
/r/MensRights27/01/22 12:21 PM
-41

If these were all white people, does it mean there's a problem with whites? For every feminist that does something stupid, there's 100 more that didnt. Is there any reason to believe feminists offend more than non feminists? Any evidence to support it? Because a handful of articles shouldn't formulate your opinion on millions of men.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 12:11 PM
-3

It was your claim that said the equal number are proven true as false which is why I used that number. But even high estimates of false claims don't approach 50 percent which is why I used a VERY safe number and certainly not one based on an agenda. If I was pushing an agenda, I'd use the FBI estimate of 8 percent instead of 50.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 12:08 PM
-15

If there's 100 reported rapes, 5 lead to conviction. If only 50 are real. Then it's 5 convictions out of 50 'real rapes'. That's 10 percent.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 11:57 AM
-39

Is that something that is common? I imagine there are very few examples of that. Who are you talking about?
/r/MensRights27/01/22 11:43 AM
13

She was arrested for putting up signs that say "'no men in women's prisons' and 'humans never change sex' were reported as being offensive." That doesn't seem any more or less offensive than things Matt billon said and he received a huge amount of support It's essentially the same comment that everyone defended in this post
/r/MensRights27/01/22 11:37 AM
-19

If we go with your assumption that the same amount are proven false as true, it means 10 percent of guilty rapists go to prison. If 10 percent of guilty rapists go to prison. Which means if you rape someone, you have a 90 percent chance of getting away with it. Those odds must be much higher when you aren't even guilty.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 11:37 AM
0

I have never and will never say believe all women. It's a foolish statement. Listen and understand all women is a better statement.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 07:58 AM
0

began in 2006 with Tarana Burke, research it. And Brian banks was accused in his junior year. 2002. 4 years before me too. And Aziz went on a bad date. She didn't sue him or press charges as far as I know. She just said he was a sex pest on a bad date. Is she not allowed to say that for some reason? Blaming me too for false allegations before me too was a thing. What's the point? If anything, it proves me too changed nothing and this was always an issue. So if nothing changed, how did meToo brin…
/r/MensRights27/01/22 07:39 AM
0

You think we should believe all men? Bold card to play.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 07:31 AM
1

Googled it and found dozens of articles. All of whom were respectful of his victimization. A handful of angry tweets doesn't really mean the entire movement of millions of people is a problem.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 07:31 AM
0

Aziz still has a successful career. He was kinda a dick on a bad date. No one thinks he's a monster. It's just a bad date. That was a case of mistaken identity in which police used bad physical evidence to make that person look guilty. Blaming me too for something 30 years before me too isn't practical. Brian banks was 4 years before the metoo movement. I don't know anything about Tawana brawley Your conflating metoo with false allegations, mistaken identities, and wrongful convictions. They are…
/r/MensRights27/01/22 07:25 AM
-1

Who was destroyed by the me too movement?
/r/MensRights27/01/22 07:21 AM
1

Who told them this movement isnt for them? Some random Twitter account? Wouldn't that be like blaming the mens rights movement for one misogynist tweet?
/r/MensRights27/01/22 07:20 AM
-27

Less than 5 percent of rapes reported to the police result in a conviction. Which means if you rape someone, there is a 95 percent chance you get away with it. Is it really that many people that are going to prison over false allegations of rape? I believe more murder trials are overturned than rape trials so how do you know people are going to jail falsely for rape? Is it just a feeling you have?
/r/MensRights27/01/22 07:00 AM
0

99 percent of people accused of sexual assault will not see a court room. And there are social repercussions too that matter. But again, do you think saying MeToo needs to end and women need to stop discussing their abuse is the right move? I don't. I think that would be crazy. It's awesome that women are discussing some of these situations because it helps other women feel like it wasn't their fault. Men not being taken seriously for sexual assault claims have nothing to do with MeToo. At all. …
/r/MensRights27/01/22 06:48 AM
1

Yep. There are many of them. But the overwhelming majority are just tweets about a shitty situation where they felt violated. This makes it clear that these things happen to many women and that the women that suffered are not alone. Most stories are Not a personal attack.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 06:38 AM
-8

This seems incredibly made up to perfectly try to paint a picture but I'll play along anyway. The bias against men was not new. It didn't start during the me too Era. If you think bias against men started in 2006, you haven't been paying attention. So IF that perfectly convenient story depicting every sterotype in existence is accurate, it could have happened long before and long after MeToo. So blaming a bunch of women talking about their assault for that nonsense is.... odd.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 06:33 AM
2

But what's the alternative? Either women discuss their assault or they don't. I think it's better that they do discuss it and normalize that their assault was not their fault. Bow society reacts by cancelling people should not mean women need to be quiet about their assaults. Youncsn say society overreacts. But Disney firing an actor for allegations does not mean that woman needs to suffer in silence. You can blame Disney if you want, not the woman that told her story.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 06:30 AM
-3

Is there any evidence at all to support the idea that MeToo increased false allegations at all? Even one small iota kf evidence to support that theory? Or did you just decide it was try and then repeat it as fact?
/r/MensRights27/01/22 06:25 AM
-9

So it helped millions of women but because you feel it didn't help men it's bad? How so. I think men and women all agree that women being helped after an assault is a good thing. We just need men to be helped too.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 06:24 AM
-8

Shit. Whoever said that sucks. Not sure who it was but theyre trash.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 02:59 AM
-6

The majority of stories reported don't even name the accuser. Many just have their relationship at the time. So I don't think it's about publicly accusing people. Have you ever actuslly searched #meToo on Twitter and read these women's stories? They aren't trying To get anyone in trouble.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 02:49 AM
-6

How do you feel the movement got out of control? You mean the people in the movement? Which people? Or the entire movement somehow got out of control?
/r/MensRights27/01/22 02:02 AM
-21

The meToo movement made millions of women discuss their abuse. This made many women have the courage to come forward and tell their story. Many men too felt more comfortable coming forward. All victims should discuss their victimization as this can be very beneficial in terms of grappling with the feelings associated.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 01:53 AM
-7

Are men and women considered equal threats? Wouldn't it make sense to base your force on the strength of the person you are subduing rather than gender?
/r/MensRights26/01/22 11:35 PM
-12

These posts are just so baseless. It's the same baseless claims you see feminists make about MRAs that have no actual support behind them. Just petty people casting stones where they know everyone will upvote.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 11:21 PM
1

Perhaps women are a mixed group that all want different things. It's possible that they all aren't one entity that thinks and acts together. That would explain why some women want one thing and others want another.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 11:11 PM
-13

No. But pushing back against the idea that men and women contribute equally is a really weird thing to do for someone that believes men and women are equal.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 07:59 PM
-9

This is a very simplistic way of looking at sales. Salespeople have 1 goal, to make money. And if you think someone is going to waste your time and won't buy, you will ignore them to favour customers you think are more serious. It's a very difficult thing to beat out of salespeople because unconscious biases exist for everyone.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 07:11 PM
-11

"The issue is with feminism, not women " says the guy that just openly said women Contribute less to society. "Women, for example, pay less in taxes than they receive from the state over their lifetime, so men as a group subsidize women as a group, I'm not sure how you interpret this as equal contributions. And women retire earlier." - techineuro
/r/MensRights26/01/22 06:59 PM
-21

Would anyone here be okay with a woman telling a man that sexism they experienced was invalid? So does it make sense to tell women that issues they face are invalid? Are we so confident that this sexism doesn't happen? Is there a reason people are so confident or have people just decided it doesn't happen because it doesn't fit in with the narrative they want to be true?
/r/MensRights26/01/22 06:55 PM
3

Men and women equally contribute to society. So any dated societal views are the fault of men and women. And there are millions and millions of women that donate time and money to homelessness, rehabilitation, the innocence project and other charities that help majority men. There's no reason to believe most women don't empathize with men.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 04:36 PM
3

I believe society at large is responsible for mens issues. That's men and women. You seem to think women don't have empathy for you but I believe the vast majority of women do have empathy for men. I can't imagine why you feel differently.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 04:00 PM
3

I don't believe that women don't have empathy for men. That seems like an unfair generalization.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 03:37 PM
1

That's fair. But its obviously tough to determine if society favours women or disfavours men. An easy way to frame that debate is whether men should be punished less or women should be punished more. But this depends on your stance on mass incarceration as much as gender. Society is a hell of a thing.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 03:14 PM
1

But isn't this a chicken and egg situation? Whether the root cause is attitudes towards women or men the results are the same. I certainly don't think anyone can possibly empirically prove which attitudes started this problem. Just where it ended up.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 02:58 PM
3

That makes sense. It's not that their parents abused substances. It's that their parents consumed substances and abused them. Tricky wording but that explanation makes it clear. Thank you.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 02:44 PM
1

Men aren't oppressors just because attitudes towards women are one of the reasons for their problems. That's a jump that doesn't make sense. If attitudes towards women are giving women advantages in certain areas, men are not the cause. All of society is the cause equally.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 02:42 PM
-2

I don't think it's anti men to say the issues men face cannot be blamed on women so much as societal views about women.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 01:54 PM
1

That's fair. You think the men in power are anti men and that leads to discriminatory practices against men. Thats a fair point that I did not consider.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 01:53 PM
-10

I guess you have to decide if you blame the people asking politicians for laws or the politicians that pass them. As we have seen huge increases in female politicians, we have also seen huge increases in the number of shared custody orders. It kind of seems like increases in female politicians and judges have been helpful.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 01:28 PM
-19

For thousands of years men made other men fight in wars and gave men longer prison sentences. Which discredits the idea that this problem developed based on discrimination against men since men were making the calls. You could argue rich and powerful men don't see men as being worthy of empathy. But that quickly overlaps with a class debate as much as gender.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 01:07 PM
0

What do you mean by trapped by an ex willing to use the system to destroy you?
/r/MensRights26/01/22 12:18 PM
1

Women don't control the courts, schools, and colleges. Those sound like societal problems. And false accusations suggesting there is a problem with women would mean rapes suggest there is a problem with men. If you want to be mgtow, more power to you. But I still don't see what the issue with women is.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 11:57 AM
0

Why are women an issue?
/r/MensRights26/01/22 11:47 AM
-8

Society has the conception that women are emotional, weak and best suited for child raising. So they favour women in child custody hearings, don't make them fight in wars, don't think they can handle prison, and there are more mental health programs available.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 11:40 AM
0

Boys are 3 times more likely to have a parent that uses drugs? How can that possibly make sense? What social reason would cause parents of boys to be 3 times more likely to abuse drugs? Am I reading that stat wrong?
/r/MensRights26/01/22 11:32 AM
34

People assume men are less trapped in relationships because the vast majority of men make more money than their spouse and are physically stronger than their spouse. However emotional abuse can make you feel small and incapable just like physical abuse.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 11:30 AM
-11

The effort that goes into proving men are more oppressed on mra subs and women are more oppressed on feminist subs is sad. Life isn't easy for anyone and everyone has issues. Making it a contest doesn't help anyone and looks sad.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 11:26 AM
1

Why can't we not start living without woman in our life? I mean just ignoring them don't get near them or start talking with them. Are women really the problem? Or is an unfair society the problem?
/r/MensRights26/01/22 11:19 AM
-1

Men are killed more in accidents where they are speeding. But who is to say if men should speed less and take less risks or if women should speed more or take more risks.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 01:52 AM
-58

general public will likely view him as a victim/hero. In most toxic relationships, they are both toxic. I doubt this one was any different.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 01:31 AM
-98

Johnny Depp on his wife "“Let’s drown her before we burn her!!! I will F*%$ her burnt corpse afterwards to make sure she’s dead.” He's no wife abuser... but he's also not the best person and maybe he should be cancelled.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 12:58 AM
-21

People don't seem to have issues with generalizing women Is it only wrong when women do it?
/r/MensRights25/01/22 11:51 AM
-24

Is it possible you just notice the interracial couples more since they bother you? Because they certainly aren't the majority of couples in TV and commercials.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 10:53 AM
-10

What comments offend you? The whole section? I don't see any that are that bad.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 01:55 PM
1

I didn't see anywhere in the article that says men should be forced. Because no one thinks that.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 01:54 PM
-15

I think they feel that way about any man that's awkwardly walking too close to women or attempting to hit on them in times that aren't appropriate. Regardless of race.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 12:06 PM
0

Who is he?
/r/MensRights24/01/22 11:49 AM
-25

You're right. But attacking the woman is a far more common response than actually thinking about a situation. So I'd expect downvotes on this.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 11:27 AM
-1

Do you think there is a stigma that IVF means you are less of a man? Or is it Katherine emotional reasons you are talking about?
/r/MensRights24/01/22 11:20 AM
-1

Sigh. Literally everyone knows you can't force people to do IVf against their will. But if your need to feel attacked by this article means you need you need to feel that's what women want... I guess that's fine.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 11:19 AM
-4

Why would a man want a child naturally but IVF isn't beneficial to them?
/r/MensRights24/01/22 11:06 AM
0

The article is about people that seek IVF. Just too late. You seem to not understand it at all
/r/MensRights24/01/22 11:03 AM
-1

It says the average couple tries for 5 years before seeking IVF despite likelihood going down after 2. Meaning eventually the men and women ARE seeking IVF and they agree to do so as a couple. This article is saying do it sooner so that you won't miss out. The desperate need to feel like a victim is causing you to look at this as though men are being forced into IVF and literally no one is doing that.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 11:00 AM
0

That's not what ANYONE is saying. They are saying IF you are going, go sooner. Not that the man has to be decree from the king, do what the woman says. Relax man, not everything is an attack on men.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 10:52 AM
0

No one wants to force men to do anything. Just seek IVF sooner if you as a couple decide that's what you want to do. Waiting 7 years and then going for IVF has bad results. If you're going, go after 2. Stop trying to find a way yo male yourself a victim because they discussed that men can be resistant.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 10:49 AM
-1

Marriages are shared. Decisions are decided together. If she wants IVF and he doesn't, they come to an agreement together. The point is not to wait too long before seeking treatment if that's what you end up wanting.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 10:48 AM
-6

I'm fully against women knocking men unconscious and putting them through IVF treatment. This article is about removing the stigma of IVF for men.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 10:39 AM
-31

But he wants to have a child too and IVF doesn't make him any less of a man. That's a stigma that we need to overcome. Not cater to.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 10:38 AM
-37

Uhhh what? These are 2 people that want to have a child and it is not happening the natural way. This article is saying men can be resistant to go to IVF but it's better to go sooner rather than waiting years. What does that have to do with women trying to change you? Yikes.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 10:32 AM
6

I really don't think everyone that has made a sexist comment online is arrested. That might be an exaggeration. MgTOW was around for years and none of them were arrested.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 10:27 AM
3

But the same people in the same society are heavily downvoting these posts. Seems like society is correctly grooming the majority to think this is disgusting
/r/MensRights24/01/22 10:26 AM
-17

The article was about constant negative interactions with men due to their inexperience with women in a social setting. They aren't afraid of men, they're tired of dealing with negative interactions with them. Do you believe they shouldn't be allowed to talk about those interactions and to do so is akin to racism?
/r/MensRights24/01/22 10:25 AM
-44

Many men have trouble admitting they need help with IVF. How is it 'male hating' to discuss this?
/r/MensRights24/01/22 10:22 AM
8

There is a massive misconception that male gaze means leering. Male gaze is about female depiction. Not just leering at a woman creepily.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 10:21 AM
3

The bias when it's your own gender is appalling. This person was raped on video too and people were mad at the victim for some reason
/r/MensRights24/01/22 02:44 AM
-9

Right. But there has been movies made before the MCU that were horrible in regards to how they portrayed women. Not having any character at all. For example, everything Michael Bay has ever done.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 01:48 AM
-10

The male gaze is about the depiction of women in art. Not how some random dude looks at some random women. There are many definitions if you type it into Google.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 01:41 AM
-33

It's the same callousness that slave owners had except slave owners had jobs and societal worth. Suggesting women have no jobs and no societal worth. Comparing women to slave owners and saying they are oppressing you. This is one of the most upvoted comments And people seriously ask questions like this about why the mens rights movement is seen as anti women? Is this for real?
/r/MensRights23/01/22 05:01 PM
-3

The marriage strike in India isn't related to men? What?
/r/MensRights23/01/22 04:00 PM
7

I find it interesting that the most upvoted posts are the ones denying OP's feelings and the ones that actually want to help the OP overcome these feelings are towards the bottom. Looking at sexual assault as a pass / fail test of legalities is not very supportive. Criminal or not, this person's experience should be validated and their emotions acknowledged. Callously explaining to get over it because it doesn't meet legal criteria is bad advice and reactions like that are the reason that victim…
/r/MensRights23/01/22 01:19 PM
1

Just did some reading about the author of this. Not sure she is the most reliable person. She lied about her credentials and then....this. "Arndt has been a source of controversy for several years, particularly for her speaking tour arguing there is a “fake rape crisis” at university campuses, her book #MenToo, and most recently for a 2018 interview conducted with convicted paedophile Nicolaas Bester. Bester was jailed for grooming and repeatedly raping his 15-year-old student. After being relea…
/r/MensRights23/01/22 11:15 AM
0

This data shows sexual assault reports to police for the last 8 years in Australia. Every year they were between 15,000 and 18,000. The same figures you are questioning. It's a pretty bold claim to suggest that the government got it wrong 8 years in a row and only you know the real stats. I think it would be helpful if you posted where your stats came from.
/r/MensRights23/01/22 11:04 AM
1

These figures are in line with the figures questioned. What makes you so confident that your figures are more accurate than those of the Australian government? I guess the question is where are you getting the number that only 2,549 incidents of sexual crimes were reported when every other article says its close to 15000?
/r/MensRights23/01/22 10:14 AM
-7

Yes. I said marital rape was bad in a complex conspiracy to accuse everyone of thinking it was good. Then they downvoted my post not because they support marital rape, but because everyone knows the complex reasons I posted it and have therefore downvoted it. It's not that you were wrong about how people will upvote, it's the advanced conspiracy you've created in your head. That's all.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 11:16 PM
-1

Could be. Could be that people want marital rape to stay legal. After all, Saying rape should be a crime shouldn't provoke people so I can't see how it would be seen as an attempt to provoke.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 10:59 PM
-7

Not really. Seem to be collecting downvotes. Just slower.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 10:53 PM
-7

I'm not trying to label anyone as anything and I have NO problem with men choosing not to get married. That's none of my business.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 09:50 PM
0

I dunno. I'm not a feminist. Not really my concern.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 07:40 PM
-12

Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code says that sex acts with a woman against her consent is classified as rape. However, there is an exception made to this law if the woman is the man's wife and older than 18. We can all agree that this 'exception' to rape is disgusting and immoral and the high court in Delhi is currently deliberating whether nor not to overrule it. Let's all hope that they get rid of this exception entirely.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 07:40 PM
2

No. They wouldn't. Protesting rape laws is only for rape supporters.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 07:31 PM
3

As of now, there's an exception in Indian law that says you can't be charged with rape if it's you're wife that you are raping. That's gross and that exception needs to be removed. I think we can all agree with that. Here's hoping the Delhi Court agrees too.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 07:20 PM
0

Lol. You're really reaching here. If I defend any aspect of feminism, I'm a rapist? That's really what you're saying? Haha.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 07:19 PM
1

No problem.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 07:13 PM
1

Anyone demanding to be allowed to rape is a rapist. Gender doesn't matter.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 07:10 PM
-8

He asked how cone women are allowed to force people to pay child support. And I'm saying women can't force people to do anything. The government does the forcing.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 07:04 PM
1

No. Being pro rape makes you an idiot. And the opinions of an idiot get dismissed immediately.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 07:01 PM
0

Maybe. But maybe everyone assumes the men not getting married were alright with marital rape and people are happy for the reduced marriage rate.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 06:44 PM
1

Nobody called women in India pro-rape when they demanded women be allowed to legally rape men. (And minor boys too) Why didn't you call them pro rape? That's clearly pro rape.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 06:32 PM
1

I didn't say it was invalid. I said it was poorly done and it made hundreds of millions of people think many men in India are pro rape. It set any progress by decades.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 06:19 PM
2

Nothing. I'm questioning the people that think protesting in response to makeing rape illegal is a good idea to get people on their cause. It's not.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 06:14 PM
2

Disagree. There are many reasons. But the fact that not being able to rape your wife is one of them, really calls into question how legitimate the others are.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 06:09 PM
2

Did you support feminists when they did it in other countries? Do you support men doing it now?
/r/MensRights22/01/22 06:09 PM
-1

Yeah. Probably just a coincidence that the marriage strike happened the same time they court was hearing about marital rape laws. I'm crazy to think they are linked together when the timing is exactly perfect and countless people openly admit it...
/r/MensRights22/01/22 06:00 PM
2

What does any of that have to do with protesting laws against marital rape?
/r/MensRights22/01/22 05:58 PM
-2

I have made literally zero statements about race because I'm not dumb enough to make clunky comparisons. You just want to talk about race to avoid talking about the real issue. Marital rape being legal.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 05:57 PM
1

Nah. That's what thr protest are about. Delhi high Court is hearing the case right now.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 05:56 PM
-1

We don't need to argue. We agree. We want the courts to remove the exception allowing Men to rape their wives. Protesters be damned.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 05:53 PM
2

Nope. Men can protest anything they want whenever they want. I just don't think laws against raping your wife are what they should protest. Just my opinion. Clearly many people disagree with me. And you seem to as well.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 05:50 PM
1

I asked you a question because I was curious what your answer would be. Not sure how that equates to anything you said. But I suppose you're angry and lashing out now.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 05:47 PM
0

There's nothing in this law that changes the requirement for evidence to convict someone of rape.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 05:44 PM
0

Leaning really hard the extreme accusations instead of rational discussion of the issues again. If you just want to come up with creative insults, this bores me. I prefer to understand why people would protest striking down an exception for rape. That's what interests me. Not what creative insults you come up with.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 05:42 PM
1

So the marriage strike is unrelated to the current discussion in Delhi Court about striking down an exception regarding marital rape? Is that your stance?
/r/MensRights22/01/22 05:38 PM
-97

I see. Women control women's groups and women's groups control politicians and the media and therefore women are to be blamed for everything. It checks out. Carry on.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 05:34 PM
1

Lol. I'd love for you to link that comment so everyone can see. It. Take your time.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 05:32 PM
0

Lol. Yes yes. The 'I'll make outlandish claims to distract from a real debate' mentality. I guess making said outlandish claims is far easier than rational discussion.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 05:32 PM
-114

So then shouldn't we blame women's advocacy groups? Not 'women'?
/r/MensRights22/01/22 05:28 PM
0

Right, but right now the high court in Delhi is deciding whether or not to strike down that exception. Many are protesting that decision. But me and you agree it should be struck down.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 05:26 PM
-1

Men put up with it for centuries and it's just sheer and utter coincidence that they started protesting the same week a Delhi Court was hearing an argument to make marital rape illegal? I dunno. Kinda looks more like people don't want rape to be illegal. Which is.... yikes.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 05:22 PM
-2

Good. Then we agree with the change in legislature in India.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 05:19 PM
-1

No one seems to. Sexist laws have been on the booms for centuries and Men weren't striking until they found out they couldn't rape their wives. Then all of a sudden it's a huge deal. Weird timing isn't it?
/r/MensRights22/01/22 05:14 PM
0

So as of now, there is an exception for rape in India if it's your wife and she is older than 18. Would you leave that exception in the books or would you get rid of that exception? I am 100 percent confident that you won't answer with one of those two options. You'll detract and talk about other issues because you can't answer honestly. Yes or no, do you remove that exception?
/r/MensRights22/01/22 05:12 PM
-5

Right. But how many women do you think will be legally raped in those few generations? You cool with that?
/r/MensRights22/01/22 05:09 PM
-1

I never objected to equality. I want it to be illegal to rape your husband too. That's equality.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 05:05 PM
-2

I think the argument was lost the moment you sided with keeping it legal to rape your wife. Lol. Because if you ask 1000 people on the street if that should be legal, 1000 say no.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 05:02 PM
-1

Yeah I guess. If you want to be exactly like feminists... which I can't see why you would.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 05:01 PM
-146

The state makes the laws about who pays child support and who doesn't. Women don't collectively make that decision.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 04:48 PM
0

Lol. The classic 'you're racist' when you lose an argument is always a telling sign. You tried and I respect that.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 04:43 PM
-3

The exact same number of men that will be raped if the law is passed. It won't affect male rape rates at all. It only increases female rape rates if it isn't passed. So really, your choices are simple. Less women get raped and the same number of men. Or the same number of men and women. I want less rape so I choose less people. Which makes me wonder why you choose differently.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 04:36 PM
-19

And how many women will be legally raped in your pursuit of equality? Would you tell them it was worth it?
/r/MensRights22/01/22 04:14 PM
-29

Better no one votes than just one race and better everyone is raped than just one gender? Interesting perspective.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 03:41 PM
-1

Gross right? But keeping it legal to rape women if you are married to them really doesn't save that problem.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 03:39 PM
0

I'm guessing you didn't bother to research the changes in the law at all. It's getting rid of an exception. It isn't a new law. You're just mad because you want to be, not because you actually researched.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 02:37 PM
1

Then this law changes nothing. Weird thing to be upset about if it changes nothing.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 02:25 PM
1

So how many women are you willing to let get legally raped while politicians and law makers drag their feet on equality? 5? 10? 1000? 10000? How many women can be raped until you feel like passing the gender biased law to protect them? For me, that number is 0. But you seem to have a different number.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 02:18 PM
0

...there is nothing in this law to suggest rape does not need to be proven. It's the same judicial system as every other crime in India.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 02:16 PM
1

Agreed. But it isn't. And women getting protection from rape is better than no one isn't it?
/r/MensRights22/01/22 02:08 PM
0

I don't support it. I support men and women having the same protection. And every time either gender gets more protection from rape, I'm happy.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 01:59 PM
-1

And you're saying the strike is about gendered rape laws? Rape laws in India were gendered for the last 100 years and there was no marriage strike. But all of a sudden they want to make raping your wife illegal and marriage strike. Are you saying that's a coincidence and the two aren't related? Because that's a bold claim that requires some proof.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 01:58 PM
-1

Rape laws in America are one sided. Do you believe they should be overturned and rape should be legalized? I would think not as only a psychopath would want rape to be legal. Advocate for men to be protected, not women to be defenseless.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 01:51 PM
-60

Would it not make more sense to protest the lack of laws protecting men from rape? Rather than protesting the laws that protect women from rape? I believe men and women should have equal protection under the law. Marital rape should be a crime no matter what genders are involved. However there were no marriage strikes last year when men had no protection under the law. The protets started as soon as the government attempted to make it illegal to rape your wife. Something that is obviously such a…
/r/MensRights22/01/22 01:04 PM
-5

Somehow, feminists got the idea that it being legal to rape your wife while she's desperately tries to fight back but is not strong enough to fight you off, is somehow an attack on women. Where would they get that idea...?
/r/MensRights22/01/22 12:01 PM
-8

Couldn't you say the same about all rape laws? Should all rape be legal because it's possible it could be used against someone? Crimes should be illegal and the justice system should sort it out fairly. Arguing that it shouldn't be a crime to pin your wife down and rape her as she sobs is not something any man should be fighting for.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 11:41 AM
-3

So...you're against all rape laws? Or just this one?
/r/MensRights22/01/22 11:23 AM
-5

"The definition of rape codified in Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code (“IPC”) includes all forms of sexual assault involving nonconsensual intercourse with a woman.[2] However, Exception 2 to Section 375 exempts unwilling sexual intercourse between a husband and a wife over fifteen years of age from Section 375’s definition of “rape” and thus immunizes such acts from prosecution." Wait...it's legal to rape your wife in India? Wtf?
/r/MensRights20/01/22 01:08 AM
-1

The article suggests she should have divorced him sooner because they weren't good as partners. She should have realized she can't change him and quit sooner.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 12:33 AM
-2

Turning Western men into pseudo-women hasn't worked out too well for us, has it? You think western men are pseudo-women? All of them or just the majority? Is insulting men as a group something mens rights should be doing?
/r/MensRights20/01/22 12:22 AM
-8

I don't understand your point. Are you saying it's women's fault that male feminists are in power?
/r/MensRights19/01/22 01:06 PM
-3

This looks like genuine outreach to help men with their mental health. It has 3 upvotes. I'm starting to think actually helping men isn't the primary concern of most people here. Try posting it again but with the title 'feminists are evil'. That should garner more attention.
/r/MensRights19/01/22 01:04 PM
-13

Women are only 30 percent of the political landscape in America. If feminists are passing laws that hurt men, 70 percent of the law passing power is men. Even if only half of those men are feminists and every single woman is a feminist, it's still majority men.
/r/MensRights19/01/22 12:38 PM
-16

The feminists in power are mostly men right? What do we do to stop men from hurting other men? How so we hold them accountable?
/r/MensRights19/01/22 11:26 AM
4

I believe spaces like this can feed off of anger sometimes and I believe seeing a contrary opinion once in a while is good for people. I haven't changed anyone's beliefs, but I do believe people should understand contrary viewpoints or situations in which they are being biased or hypocritical. Being confronted with things like that forces us to review our own biases. Me included. People have changed the way I think with some well worded arguments. Others just get upset and call me a cuck. Easy t…
/r/MensRights19/01/22 11:10 AM
-35

I see. If you don't think the same as everyone else, you are a troll. Perhaps someday you'll get the echo chamber you want where you never have to see different opinions.
/r/MensRights19/01/22 10:56 AM
-47

How is this trolling? I think it's a pretty fair question how a man could become such a man hater. Did we not want to ask that question just so we can pretend it was a woman that did this? Is that why I'm a troll?
/r/MensRights19/01/22 10:45 AM
-8

So it's not really his fault that he hates men. It's Ingrained in society. So we shouldn't blame women rot tweeting to kill all men either. It's more of a societal thing.
/r/MensRights19/01/22 10:41 AM
-2

The fictional representation of what a feminist is on this page is fascinating. I've met thousands of feminists ad most identify as feminist and never anyone that espouses the views that all feminists have according to this sub. It's interesting.
/r/MensRights19/01/22 10:22 AM
0

Yes.
/r/MensRights19/01/22 10:15 AM
-62

Meanwhile the man that tweeted this isn't punished at all. Just horrible And it begs the question, why would a man tweet to kill all men?
/r/MensRights19/01/22 09:52 AM
-12

Most feminists are supportive of men's rights (the concept, not this subreddit). However many people have created this idea of what a feminist is and they are all man hating psychopaths that want to reduce men to 10 percent of the population. Meeting feminists in real life is VERY different than the fictional representation of feminists people seem to have created here.
/r/MensRights19/01/22 09:48 AM
-46

Twitter user also has other classic tweets like; 'Yall still paying 50 dollars for pornstar promoted fleshlights while I stick my dick into the eye of a hurricane for free' And 'I need a bunch of hookers and cocaine'.
/r/MensRights19/01/22 12:02 AM
-21

So whenever a woman does anything wrong, it's feminisms fault? People are blindly upvoting and that's fine...but people must realize how foolish that thinking is.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 10:59 PM
-56

I still often see women shaming men for crying or opening up emotionally.. There was a topic posted in this sub in the last week about how a woman lost all respect for a man she was romantically interested in, all because he finally opened up and dared cry in front of her... What does that have to do with feminism? Feminism isn't responsible for every woman's actions.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 08:55 PM
-3

Yeah, 50 percent of the population retiring 1 year earlier is the same as everyone retiring 35 years earlier. It must be nice for corporations and governments to have so many people on their side instead of looking out for their own interests.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 02:53 PM
-10

Not everyone is so cavalier about the government taking away things that make their life better
/r/MensRights18/01/22 02:19 PM
-3

Wanting men to retire earlier makes me a feminazi?
/r/MensRights18/01/22 02:14 PM
-14

Men weren't doing anything either. Do you expect women to fight battles for men when not even men will?
/r/MensRights18/01/22 02:03 PM
-12

And if they raised it for men and women to 66, you would be fine with that? Based on life expectancy? Or would you protest?
/r/MensRights18/01/22 02:02 PM
3

No. Not sure if you're misunderstanding. I'm against sexism so I want the retirement age for men to be moved to 64 for the sake of equality.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 01:49 PM
-98

So the men of Switzerland should protest to get a 64 retirement age. Then the men will live better lives. Women being bumped to 65 doesn't help men.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 01:44 PM
2

I never said it wasn't sexist. It's clearly sexist. And the solution is to give the same benefit to men.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 01:44 PM
2

I'm not getting this analogy.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 01:37 PM
-6

Goal post stats. Men should be offered the same advantages women get. We agree on that. Removing those advantages from women does nothing to help men.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 01:29 PM
0

Women were protesting raising the age of women's retirement. They were not protesting the current age of men's retirement. Women were protesting a law that makes their life worse. If men held a protest to say they should be able to return at 64. I like to think many women would show up. We all lose when we chip away at advantages in petty competition. Men deserve the same rights as women and taking those rights from women doesn't help men at all.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 01:28 PM
-25

I'm no feminist. I just think we should help other men to make mens lives better. Not make things worse for women so that both men and women have no privileges.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 01:19 PM
-1

No what does it have to do with the retirement age in Switzerland?
/r/MensRights18/01/22 01:18 PM
-17

Yeah. Feminists suck. What does that have to do with this though?
/r/MensRights18/01/22 01:13 PM
1

I don't get to decide. The government does. And people should protest when the government sides with corporations over people. Like in this scenario.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 01:12 PM
-2

I don't think most countries could handle that.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 01:04 PM
-2

Yeah. Letting people stop working at 64 is socialism and the world will fall apart if we do it. Makes sense
/r/MensRights18/01/22 01:04 PM
-60

Do you think they should remove the man tax or add a woman tax? I think remove the man tax is the obvious answer. Adding a tax to women doesn't help men.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 01:03 PM
-149

I'm all for equality. Making everyone's lives better. Not the equality where we make half of the lives worse.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 01:00 PM
-40

This law does NOTHING to help men. At all. It will however have a negative impact on women. This group should be about helping men live lives as easy as women. Not making women's lives as bad as mens. The race to the bottom mentality is toxic.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 12:41 PM
-417

Don't we all want advantages for men and women? Or no advantages for anyone? Women had an advantage in retirement. Shouldn't men have that too? Is this a mens rights group to help men live better lives? Or an anti women privilege group to make sure women live worse lives which has no effect on men at all?
/r/MensRights18/01/22 12:38 PM
2

Depends if you feel the right to retirement should come at 64 or 65. I tend to side with people and say 64. But many side with corporations and say 65. I like people more than corporations.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 12:33 PM
1

There's an earnings gap. Men earn more than women. And men shouldn't be punished for that just in the name of equality.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 12:32 PM
-12

Exactly. Which is why it would be total BS if they were docked pay to make it even with women. No one should be punished just to make things equal.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 12:27 PM
-29

I didn't say anything about a wage gap. Men overall make more than women. That's a fact. And if men were told we are paying you 9 percent less to make it when with women, that would be BS.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 12:22 PM
-57

Feminists wouldn't protest lowering mens retirement age to 64. So its not equality they have an issue with. It's rights being taken away from them that both men and women should have. If employers lowered all mens pay match women's pay, men would protest. Would that mean those men are against equality?
/r/MensRights18/01/22 12:05 PM
0

Feminism is no more a hate ideology than mensrights. They both spend too much time whining about the other gender.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 10:44 AM
-3

I guess to be a real man, you have to take up multiple seats while women stand. Pretty clear to see what's toxic about that kind of masculinity
/r/MensRights18/01/22 10:18 AM
0

Nah. Feminism doesn't mean every man is an abuser. That's just what you've decides it means so that you can be mad at feminism.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 10:13 AM
3

Yeah. But i meet hundreds of people a year, many identify as feminist, none are crazy. It's easy to judge by quotes from 20 years ago or a tweet from some pyscho. But most people are fine. And millions of them feminists.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 03:20 AM
0

Probably most of them. As opposed to a minority of feminists that are shitty. If I found 10 misogynistic quotes from incels that support mens rights, would it mean mens rights is a hate group?
/r/MensRights18/01/22 03:04 AM
1

10 examples of feminists being jerks versus 200 million Americans that identify as feminist. I dunno... My position is that all movements have shitty people that say shitty things and feminism and mens rights are no different.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 02:58 AM
-1

Over 200 million people identify as feminist in America. So no... it's not that many. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/07/07/61-of-u-s-women-say-feminist-describes-them-well-many-see-feminism-as-empowering-polarizing/
/r/MensRights18/01/22 02:49 AM
-3

Its literally the definition of manspreading. Manspreading" or "man-sitting" is a pejorative neologism referring to the practice of men sitting in public transport with legs wide apart, thereby covering more than one seat. A public debate began when an anti-manspreading campaign started on the social media website Tumblr in 2013; the term appeared a year later. Wikipedia
/r/MensRights18/01/22 02:26 AM
-4

Yeah. People that do that stuff suck. But luckily it's very few people.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 02:18 AM
-4

When someone needs to sit down next to me, I can sit with my legs together to only take up one Seat. Are you not able to do that?
/r/MensRights18/01/22 02:14 AM
-2

If a woman is putting her bags on the seat and people want to sit down...yeah... I I'm going to hate on them. That's a jerk move.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 02:04 AM
-4

Dunno. The original poster was bragging about it. Which is weird.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 01:55 AM
-10

I'm a man. And I sit with my legs open. But manspreading is when you're being a jerk and other people want to sit down.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 01:43 AM
0

And yet no young women feel this way. Or at least shockingly few.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 01:42 AM
-21

I don't spread my legs on the subway so women can't sit down and then mock them for calling me out on it...and so I'm a white knight? I'm not getting it.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 01:42 AM
-1

I never condoned calling it manspeading. I called out the guy that says he does it. Because it's a jerk thing to do.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 01:41 AM
-1

There are bad apples in every bunch. That's for sure.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 01:30 AM
-1

Which one do you have issue with?
/r/MensRights18/01/22 01:29 AM
0

Female dating strategy are very ANTI feminist. Not sure about the others.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 01:26 AM
0

Asking what the problem was isn't a deflection. It's a request for clarification. I can't discuss every line in an article.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 01:24 AM
0

No one is seriously suggesting a male curfew. Not one person.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 01:11 AM
-2

What did you have issue with in that article?
/r/MensRights18/01/22 01:10 AM
3

That was a better article. That women seems like a feminist and seems like she's blaming all men. Excellent one example out of hundreds of millions of feminists.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 12:01 AM
3

You posted five examples of people doing horrible things to boys. But none of them were feminists as far as I can tell. Do you have more info to suggest they are feminists? Or do you just call them feminists because you don't like them? Are feminists a women you don't like?
/r/MensRights17/01/22 11:59 PM
-1

This was a character in a fiction book.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 11:51 PM
-33

Manspreading" or "man-sitting" is a pejorative neologism referring to the practice of men sitting in public transport with legs wide apart, thereby covering more than one seat. A public debate began when an anti-manspreading campaign started on the social media website Tumblr in 2013; the term appeared a year later. Wikipedia
/r/MensRights17/01/22 11:34 PM
-35

Aren't 'people who take up more seats than one' the enemy? Male or female, if you do it, you suck. Trying to gender selfish behaviour like hogging seats is weird.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 11:21 PM
2

What? I was never abusive and oppressive. Most men aren't.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 11:20 PM
-16

Right. I'm still looking for an example of feminists saying all men need to change. Because I don't think anyone is saying that.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 11:19 PM
-4

I guess made up arguments are easier to handle than an actual person questioning your viewpoint. Seems you're better equipped for the made up kind.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 11:03 PM
-16

That logic is heavily flawed. Even of there is a patriarchy and even if men are oppressors, it still doesn't mean all men need to change. Did all white people need to change to end slavery during the Civil War? No. Many white men fought for the north. Only the racists needed to change.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 11:02 PM
-8

There nothing there that's feminists telling all men to change. Imagining fake arguments isn't a mens rights issue.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 10:51 PM
-88

You purposefully take up more than one seat on busy subway trains just to be a jerk and feminists are the bad guys in that story?
/r/MensRights17/01/22 10:47 PM
-60

So why are you demanding that all men have to change because of what a tiny minority of men do? What feminists are demanding all men have to change? Is anyone actually making this statement or is this something made up to prove a point on reddit?
/r/MensRights17/01/22 10:42 PM
-5

Domestic violence and rape Breakdown of gender in violent crime
/r/MensRights17/01/22 09:03 PM
1

We don't have kids and we have a cleaner that does most of the work. Neither of us do that much housework.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 08:52 PM
-8

How do you tell when research on violence is 'feminist research'? Do you have to Google the author? Is it just based on whether or not you like the results?
/r/MensRights17/01/22 07:59 PM
1

Nah, she does more. But I work longer hours so it balances out in the end. I'd say it's about 70/30 for housework but I work 45 hours a week and her 35 and from home. Don't really see how that's related though.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 07:02 PM
0

Looks like you're doing the same. I guess childish finger pointing isn't a very popular opinion.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 04:57 PM
2

Assuming the best or worst case scenario is a fools errand. Every situation is different. Some complaints are justified and some aren't. But OP did not say unjustified women should stop complaining. He suggested all women should. And I think that's dumb as many have valid complaints about imbalances in unpaid labour.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 04:53 PM
-3

This comes off more as a embarrassing 'nuh uh, You are!' Then an educated response. You'd don't need to get so defensive just because people are discussing an area men as a group need to improve on.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 04:48 PM
0

Lol. I guess we just have to decide who knows more about it. The thousands discussing it in sociology, or your interpretation based on your need to be mad at women.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 04:27 PM
0

And yet, of all the thousands of articles discussing it...no-one has ever mentioned wanting to be paid for it....
/r/MensRights17/01/22 04:20 PM
4

I don't understand this. You think an expectation of equal share of housework is misogynistic?
/r/MensRights17/01/22 04:19 PM
-4

... wow. It's labour that you don't get paid for. It's unpaid labour. Literally no one is asking to be paid for housework. I'm sure you have housework too. And if you share a house with a wife and you are doing 30 hours of unpaid labour a week and she is doing 5...and you both work full time jobs. It's an issue. Obviously.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 03:40 PM
-13

No one is asking to be paid for unpaid labour. You don't really understand this issue.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 03:31 PM
-7

Where does it say its about stay at home moms? It just says 'women'.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 03:29 PM
3

I think most people got the vaccine because it was the scientificly proven thing to do. Not due to fear and threats. Men should get the vaccine and not be cavalier about their health. Pushing the idea that those that chose to get it are catering to fear and threats and any less manly than anyone else is exactly the problem the article is discussing.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 12:52 PM
-21

Most women work full time jobs. I think most people complaining about unpaid labour are the women that get home after both them and their husband's work 8 hour days, and yet they are responsible for child rearing and cleaning. Because everyone would hate that. Edit: downvoted for not assuming the worst about the woman with issues with unpaid labour? I'm a man and I don't like when my wife expects me to do more housework than her since we both work. Is it really so bad that women don't like it ei…
/r/MensRights17/01/22 10:14 AM
-26

Grr... women don't like being responsible for cleaning the house after their 8 hour work day. Let's be mad at them!
/r/MensRights17/01/22 10:10 AM
-15

How exactly is childish insults about women related to mens rights? Not even pretending to hide the hate for women anymore...
/r/MensRights17/01/22 03:34 AM
-1

So businesses right now just have extra staff they don't need out of the goodness of their hearts and if they have to pay people fairly, they will stop doing that? I'm not sure you are correct.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 12:00 AM
2

Or businesses could be forced to pay people what they are worth without the negotiating. That's better for everyone.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 11:52 PM
4

If you don't care what anyone else makes, why do you care if it's discussed?
/r/MensRights16/01/22 06:04 PM
6

Right. And we agree this advocacy for women is a good thing. We both support it.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 06:03 PM
-3

I accused no one of anything. I'm glad we agree that this initiative for women is a good thing. Though I think some may view it negatively.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 05:55 PM
5

Why would an employer feel the need to pay you the same as someone that works 2 thirds as much? Salary sharing won't do that. Why would it. Perhaps you're getting paid less than the person that works 2 thirds of the hours. Wouldn't that be bad?
/r/MensRights16/01/22 05:54 PM
-6

I never said this was anti woman. I said I was for this initiative and to be against it doesn't make sense. If you feel attacked by that statement I can't help you.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 05:50 PM
9

You didn't. I'm just seeing if we all agree that initiatives supporting women like this are good things and hopefully ones supporting men follow suit.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 05:49 PM
18

It's not. But by sharing this information, employers will be forced to pay women and men more equally since numbers will be public. A huge win for equality.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 05:35 PM
-45

This man admits to having oral sex with her but claims he never had actual sex with her. And yet she ended up pregnant. I imagine millions of men would say the same if it meant they could not pay thousands in child support. The man in question certainly claims he was only receiving oral sex but the judge thought otherwise.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 03:52 PM
-3

How would being open about salaries hold you back?
/r/MensRights16/01/22 03:36 PM
-2

This is obviously not real. At least make the rage bait believable
/r/MensRights16/01/22 02:11 PM
-14

I don't go on women's subs. But I'd say that's a pretty stupid thing to say wouldn't you?
/r/MensRights16/01/22 01:33 PM
-2

Having a preference for gender is perfectly acceptable. I'm not sure who told you that but they are not the majority. Check out this reddit thread discussing exactly that. People are very supportive of those that prefer boys
/r/MensRights16/01/22 01:32 PM
-15

It makes more sense to be FOR male advocacy than To be AGAINST female advocacy. As advocacy for things like equal pay for equal work is a good thing for all genders.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 01:12 PM
0

99% of women will accuse you of being a creep if you're not a beautiful man Most men aren't beautiful and they are happily married. Me being one of them. If 99 percent of women you meet are calling you a creep, but most men are happily married...is it possible you are the problem in this equation? Potentially the views that women are 'antagonistic' towards you and you use words like 'pussy privilege'? Could people not like you for that reason and it has nothing to do with your looks? I don't kno…
/r/MensRights16/01/22 12:47 PM
0

It does qualify, when women and society label us "violent rapists", Women and society? Aren't women part of society? Aren't men that label men as violent rapists just as much of a problem? If you have issues with people that think a certain way, address that line of thinking. Not the gender you've just randomly chosen to blame for your problems. It's like feminists saying 'men are trash because so many men are misognyists'.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 12:18 PM
-2

That's fair, the empathy gap and internalized misandry are social issues that can fairly be called mens rights. Even if not legal rights issues. Though I still think the diatribe about how bad women are doesn't qualify.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 11:08 AM
-17

They're swinging from the branches here. They always come flying in whenever you make a good point to call you a sexist. Is This an example of a 'good point' Is it so bad to be called out when you are being blatantly sexist?
/r/MensRights16/01/22 11:06 AM
0

20 to 30 percent of rapes in India are based on a promise to marry being retracted. It is legal for a mam to change his mind but if prosecution can prove a man lied right from the start, he will be convicted of rape. This is because India is very conservative and a woman with previous sexual partners is not viewed the same in society and will therefore have a harder time finding a marriage. Promising to marry and lying about it on purpose is obviously incredibly damaging and devastating to a wom…
/r/MensRights16/01/22 10:56 AM
-1

Women are so self-absorbed and they know they're the "prize" in society's eyes. Relationships are all about them -- entertaining them, paying for their gifts and going out, making them laugh, making them feel beautiful, and I can go on and on. How often do you see them try to make a man feel good? No, they'll tell their fat friends about what queens they are but hardly ever do it for guys, even when those men do it for them. 'Mens rights' isn't why you are getting depressed. You didn't post anyt…
/r/MensRights16/01/22 10:46 AM
20

That crime had as much to do with misogyny as all the posts here about women committing crimes have to do with mens rights. Nothing. People just like rage bait and feeling like a victim.
/r/MensRights15/01/22 09:26 PM
0

Except different genders have different reasons for drugs, homelessness, violence, and every other societal illness. One size fits all programs aren't efficient. That's why programs that target specific causes are more effective. Some help men. And some help women. Some help minorities and some help the rich. Fighting addiction to prescription pain medication is different than crystal meth. Just like targeting male domestic violence is different than female. Targeting violence from females would…
/r/MensRights15/01/22 03:00 PM
0

I didn't 'gotcha' I'm genuinely surprised to hear that you are against programs targeting male homelessness.
/r/MensRights15/01/22 02:49 PM
0

Is advocating for a policy that helps male homelessness sexist? Are you against shelters for men because they exclusively help men? Helping one gender is fine. You just need other programs to help other genders. You're exactly like the feminists that protest male shelters because they are against anyone getting help that isn't them.
/r/MensRights15/01/22 02:31 PM
1

I'm very guilty of viewing men and women equally. People just don't like that for some reason.
/r/MensRights15/01/22 02:24 PM
-10

Is it frustrating that a post about a woman not liking cargo pants got twice as many upvotes on a mens rights subreddit than something actually related to mens rights? Random woman hates cargo pants
/r/MensRights15/01/22 10:44 AM
1

Lol. Dodge the question because you can't bring yourself to say sexism against women should be called out. If you refuse to say sexism should be called out, you're part of the problem.
/r/MensRights15/01/22 10:40 AM
1

So you agree that we should call out men that say sexist things? Or we should support men that say sexist things? I'm clearly not understanding so just answer that question.
/r/MensRights15/01/22 10:33 AM
-2

Not at all. You just said we should side with men that say horrific things as feminists side with women that say horrific things. I disagree. I think people that say stupid things should be called out regardless of gender
/r/MensRights15/01/22 10:30 AM
-2

Women's rights pages take on and do well, despite them saying truly horrific things about men. You know why? Because at least they all know what side they're on. Not sure why we can't do that. So you want to side with men that say horrific things about women just because they are men? Uhhhh... that's not good.
/r/MensRights15/01/22 10:28 AM
-16

The phrase is said more often on this subreddit than any other subreddit around. If it bothers you, this may not be the ideal spot for you. Perhaps you would heal better avoiding the phrase.
/r/MensRights15/01/22 10:26 AM
-14

Grrr. Women bad! I wonder why people think this sub has issues with women.
/r/MensRights15/01/22 02:44 AM
-46

About 77 women tweeted #KillAllMen and people have been complaining about it ever since to feel victimized by it. It's really nothing to pay attention to.
/r/MensRights15/01/22 01:45 AM
-1

Yeah. I support initiatives to reduce women being assaulted so I am for male rape.... that makes sense. They hyperbole makes me wonder how in touch with reality you are.
/r/MensRights15/01/22 12:02 AM
6

More than feminist types though, I have seen men groveling for approval which makes my blood boil. Are men not feminist types?
/r/MensRights14/01/22 07:21 PM
-2

She's an obvious stalking psychopath. Hardly a free pass. He just sucks too.
/r/MensRights14/01/22 01:32 PM
-17

I guess. Seems weird to go so far out of your way to defend this guy.
/r/MensRights14/01/22 01:26 PM
-2

I posted stats. The fact that you don't like them is not proving me wrong.
/r/MensRights14/01/22 01:25 PM
-3

So did you have any evidence that domestic violence is australia is not gendered. Or do you feel you know best and don't need any statistical backing to make such claims? I'm happy to read anything you can find.
/r/MensRights14/01/22 01:07 PM
-16

'Creep' is not a jailable offense. 19 year olds are not off limits, but if you cheat on your wife whom you have 2 kids with, with a girl you met when she was 17. Yeah, I don't think Creep is an unfair analysis. Do you?
/r/MensRights14/01/22 01:05 PM
-4

Wow. The downvotes for stating the obvious seems pretty weird. Obviously this dude is a creep.
/r/MensRights14/01/22 01:03 PM
-20

Do you have any stats to suggest my stats are incorrect. Or do you just decide the stats in Australia because you know better than everyone? Im happy to read opposing views but dismissing stats because you don't like them seems like a poor approach to analysis.
/r/MensRights14/01/22 12:11 PM
0

It's what modern women do. Anyone that complains about 'modern women' as though they are one entity usually has too many issues with women to view these things fairly.
/r/MensRights14/01/22 11:42 AM
-28

According to the stats in the article I posted, women are twice as likely to be victims of domestic violence. Wouldn't teaching that it isn't gendered be lying?
/r/MensRights14/01/22 11:35 AM
43

Yes. Of course. I wouldn't employ a female teacher caught sleeping with students either. However colleges all get to make their own decisions as this is not a law. Just a rule.
/r/MensRights14/01/22 11:17 AM
2

If this division of roles is what makes people happy, do you agree that courts should assign custody rights based on this? Or would you prefer we remove these gender expectations altogether? Should employers be more hesitant yo promote women based on their stereotypes? Or should we remove these expectations altogether?
/r/MensRights14/01/22 10:52 AM
88

He lost his job and she was still not jailed 42 year old teachers always lose their job for sleeping with 17 or 18 year old students. No university wants that risk with one of their faculty.
/r/MensRights14/01/22 10:13 AM
-35

Domestic violence rates in Australia are significantly higher for women and the government is trying to address that. Is trying to create support for victims of domestic violence really that bad? Why? What will be the negative outcome of putting women that have been abused on domestic abuse panels to better understand how to help people in that situation. Women are more than twice as likely to be victims of interpersonal violence in Australia. There's no reason to be mad that the government want…
/r/MensRights14/01/22 10:00 AM
12

"Women should be the primary caregivers of children and men should be the primary breadwinners." This article is more tradcon BS. PEOPLE should do what makes them happy. Not be assigned a role by their gender.
/r/MensRights14/01/22 09:53 AM
-4

So when a man works, he's supporting his family. When a woman works, she's not making her family a priority? You must realize how flawed your logic is.
/r/MensRights14/01/22 12:53 AM
-5

I don't think this person would have raped a man. So this victim was undoubtedly chosen based on gender.
/r/MensRights13/01/22 10:09 PM
-12

So he was just as likely to have raped a man? That's a pretty bold statement. I imagine gender played a role there.
/r/MensRights13/01/22 06:32 PM
-10

The feminism obsession with pushing women to workforce and foregoing motherhood is a blessing. Other ethnicities and religions, where family and children are a priority are going to replace European ethnicities The idea that you can't work and have your family be a priority is insulting to men everywhere. Most men work. Are you saying their family is not their priority? Could that be why women are favored in custody battles?
/r/MensRights13/01/22 01:10 PM
-54

Acts like this, while not illegal, are certainly immoral. And the fact that, only when they are done to men, they cause little outrage You would be hard pressed to find someone that thinks this is okay. Not sure what more you want.
/r/MensRights13/01/22 12:44 PM
72

What crime would it be if a man convinced a woman to get her tubes tied and then left her? This is disgusting behaviour but the rights are the same for men and women. It's not illegal to encourage your partner to do something. Although the article reads like someone telling a story certainly not a real thing. Author seems to know every discussion had in this person's marriage which is...odd.
/r/MensRights13/01/22 12:22 PM
-2

Do you not also wonder why so many fathers kill their children? Orbdo you only wonder about mothers?
/r/MensRights13/01/22 11:16 AM
6

"You can hear and see tons of news stories about mothers killing their children. Statistics aren't 100% correct, either." You have to appreciate a comment that uses the news to cite their case and then proceeds to diminish statistical analysis. As though watching dateline is a better way to analyze societal trends than statistics.
/r/MensRights13/01/22 11:01 AM
1

Canada had similar results.
/r/MensRights13/01/22 10:25 AM
-3

This study found similar results
/r/MensRights13/01/22 10:21 AM
-12

This study found that men and women kill their children in equal rates. Are you sure it's very different? Or are you just basing your knowledge on the many stories posted here about women killing their children?
/r/MensRights13/01/22 10:20 AM
10

Is blaming feminism for every woman's bad actions any less sad than blaming patriarchy every time a male does something stupid? The obsession with blaming feminism every time a woman makes a comment people don't like Is fascinating. Edit: I posted multiple articles about how fillicide rates are fairly even between men and women... but I guess blaming feminism is so much easier than analyzing data.
/r/MensRights13/01/22 10:17 AM
-12

Or not talk about the race of a coworker you barely know. Is that really so hard?
/r/MensRights12/01/22 09:43 PM
-8

Most false accusers don't want to go to court, but will still accuse someone in front of other people or tell people that "(person's name) (did this)" to get people to demonize this poor dude and completely destroy his social life. Isn't this just assuming this person is a false accuser without evidence? Shouldn't someone be convicted of a crime so heinous before we assume they are guilty of it? Or should we assume guilt until proven innocent.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 09:18 PM
-26

The article also mentioned the innocent bystander concept be expanded to intervene if a woman is encouraged to have children. The article said to intervene if someone is saying 'half Asian babies are the cutest' to an Asian person upon finding out her husband is white. It has nothing to do with encouraging someone to have children. It has to do with not saying racially insensitive stuff. Which is pretty good advice.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 08:57 PM
-11

I see. White men are being forced out of Hollywood and are simultaneously the most successful group in Hollywood. That makes sense..
/r/MensRights12/01/22 06:07 PM
-13

76 percent of the population and 85 percent of the highest paid actors and actresses. Hard to argue white people are being driven out when they are clearly overrepresented in the highest earners.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 02:45 PM
-5

76.3 percent.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 02:37 PM
-22

Of the top 20 highest paid actors and actresses. Only 3 weren't white. It's pretty hard to argue Hollywood is 'driving out white men' just because a few more films have minority lead actors. See
/r/MensRights12/01/22 02:24 PM
-2

No, we agree. Feminism doesn't advocate regarding circumcision. Just like mens rights doesn't advocate against female genital mutilation. I don't see a problem with either.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 02:18 PM
-2

If women, in a desperate attempt to look as feminine as possible, were actively hurting themselves. I would call that toxic femininity. Why wouldn't you? There are some examples of that, just not very many. Even things like spending so much money on makeup could be construed that way, but a woman stops wearing make up and society thinking she's depressed and not effective. So it's a double edged sword there.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 01:06 PM
-3

And to be clear, feminism is a shadow organization that controls the UN right? Every time the UN feeds a starving child, that's feminism right?
/r/MensRights12/01/22 12:28 PM
-3

Lol. Even when the man is arrested, charged, and convicted, people here try to blame the woman. You can't make this stuff up.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 11:36 AM
-7

Men never try to act tough in front of other men? Society is the root cause of men pushing to he more masculine. And society is composed of men and women. Trying to blame women for it while simultaneously saying it doesn't exist is weird.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 11:33 AM
-3

So men are taught to hide their emotions to display their masculinity to women. This hiding of emotions hurts men but they do it anyway to be masculine. The push to achieve masculinity in front of other men and women has become toxic. What should we call this type of social push for masculinity despite negative results?
/r/MensRights12/01/22 11:32 AM
-3

That article says it should be offered to adult males. I have no problem with that. Do you?
/r/MensRights12/01/22 11:03 AM
-2

So you feel feminism is obligated to campaign against male and female genital mutilation or they are a hate ideology? Do you feel mens rights activists are obligated to campaign for prostate and breast cancer or they are a hate group? Do mens rights activists need to protest against female homelessness or else they are a hate group? Obviously not. The lengths people go to just to be offended is crazy
/r/MensRights12/01/22 11:01 AM
1

She also said "there are MANY instances where I would EXPECT and APPRECIATE a display of grief in the form of TEARS and even SOBBING from a man" I'm not sure she knows what she wants.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 02:27 AM
-12

I dunno, this guy only got a manslaughter charge for doing it. And this woman was charged with murder. Proof
/r/MensRights12/01/22 02:05 AM
-15

There is nothing in that article supportive of the practice of circumcision. Why did you post it?
/r/MensRights12/01/22 01:41 AM
-37

Feminists feel the same way about forced parenthood responsibilities as they feel about forced genital mutilation. As long as it's not happening to women, they don't care. Feminists are against circumcision. Have you never asked a feminist? Proof
/r/MensRights12/01/22 12:49 AM
-13

You don't think it's because women wanted women to be believed when they come forward with a sexual assault? You think it was about hurting men on purpose?
/r/MensRights11/01/22 05:57 PM
-12

Which women wanted that? All of them?
/r/MensRights11/01/22 05:55 PM
0

Agreed. Feminism and MGTOW aren't much different. Which is why I'm surprised people support MGTOW
/r/MensRights11/01/22 02:00 PM
-1

It's naive to pretend that MGTOW was simply about men doing their own thing and wasn't rife with people that hate women and wanted to discuss that hate. See?
/r/MensRights11/01/22 01:48 PM
-3

Societal views.
/r/MensRights11/01/22 11:55 AM
-6

All my posts were asking for clarity. I'm trying to listen. How do men not exist?or not have opinions? Or not trust their wives?
/r/MensRights11/01/22 11:43 AM
-6

You misunderstood the article. It's not that you can't mention them together. It's that you can't compare them in terms of oppression. Although in backlash from society for opinions, they are easily comparable.
/r/MensRights11/01/22 11:40 AM
-16

This thread is pretty clear that men today barely exist, don't have opinions, and have no self respect. This is the man hating I would expect on FDS but the negative generalizations of men here is not good to see.
/r/MensRights11/01/22 10:50 AM
10

I have a lot of opinions but don't often face backlash. But yeah, I guess opinions about women or minorities often come with backlash if they aren't the status quo.
/r/MensRights11/01/22 10:41 AM
-44

Men don't exist today? How so? Edit is no one able to explain this? Clearly people don't like my opinion but no one is saying how men don't exist anymore. Is this just more tradcon men aren't men BS?
/r/MensRights11/01/22 10:29 AM
6

I don't think anyone in my life would ever encourage a woman cheating to 'fight the patriarchy'. Seems like the garbage on FDS but not real life.
/r/MensRights11/01/22 10:29 AM
12

My understanding is that women and men cheat at equal levels. So I imagine it was always like that. Then again, women would have been less likely to cheat when they were dependant on their husband for income and didn't make their own money. So maybe women do cheat more now that they aren't as dependant.
/r/MensRights11/01/22 10:23 AM
-35

I think there are many men with opinions today. I don't know why you would think otherwise. Do you feel men are so insignificant now that none of them even have opinions? Because that seems kind of insulting to me.
/r/MensRights11/01/22 10:15 AM
-31

You think its strange when a man trusts his spouse today? Why?
/r/MensRights11/01/22 10:13 AM
-16

Meth head smokes meth is not a mens rights issue.
/r/MensRights10/01/22 04:12 PM
-25

Isn't that just being sexist to fight sexism?
/r/MensRights10/01/22 03:40 PM
-28

Does this raise awareness about women's nature though? Or just this one person? Can all women be judged by this woman? Is that fair?
/r/MensRights10/01/22 02:10 PM
-5

Lol. The effort you out into not liking me is Impressive. Is it so offensive to you that people have to justify their opinions?
/r/MensRights10/01/22 11:38 AM
0

He specifically said that a man would he arrested in this scenario I just reiterated it to see if he realized how wrong he was when it was repeated.
/r/MensRights10/01/22 11:32 AM
-4

The article didn't say whether or not the father even wanted custody. Perhaps he would have had a paper abortion if he had the option. And you think a man who's friend leaves a child at a wrong home would be in jail? Really?
/r/MensRights10/01/22 10:22 AM
-5

Yes, this woman is stupid. But what does it have to do with mens rights? Is every stupid action committed by a woman a mens rights issue? Obviously not. Does this woman's actions have anything to do with women in general? Obviously not. This is one stupid woman doing something stupid so how does it have any relation to mens rights?
/r/MensRights10/01/22 10:13 AM
-30

Is there something to do with mens rights here? Or is this more of a 'women are bad, see?' Type post?
/r/MensRights10/01/22 09:56 AM
2

Is this about men's rights at all? Or is this just rage bait because a woman did something stupid?
/r/MensRights10/01/22 09:55 AM
-9

What does this have to do with mens rights? These 'look women doing bad things posts' are getting tiresome. Does a man doing something bad say ANYTHING about men as a whole? No.
/r/MensRights10/01/22 09:46 AM
4

It's like people are so obsessed with being masculine that they will literally say and do things that are poisoning society for men. People are so desperate to be seen as masculine that they will say toxic things.
/r/MensRights10/01/22 02:36 AM
-6

Woman consents but later claims she didn’t feel she was able to say no, and this argument is all too often accepted and men found guilty when everyone involved agrees consent was given. All too often? Really? I'm skeptical you can find a single example of a man being found guilty in these circumstances. Just one example. I get that it's easy to feel this way with the doom and gloom but this is not something that has happened.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 08:19 PM
13

You can't consent when you are 15. It doesn't matter who initiated it.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 07:15 PM
-45

Cool. But man or woman if you're taking pictures instead of helping, you suck.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 07:11 PM
-23

Not sure what that has to do with anything.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 06:56 PM
-64

Most men aren't expected to shovel after a 12 hour night shift. 99 99% of men don't even work a 12 hour night shift. Taking pictures instead of helping is purposefully begging the internet to hate you.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 06:53 PM
1

Right. But I'm 35 now and spending time with 25 year olds is... not great. They're still so young. I'd much prefer to be with someone my own age. I suppose everyone is different.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 06:45 PM
-2

Why does women's sexual marketplace value as they age? Don't they too acquire resources and experience making them more valuable partners?
/r/MensRights09/01/22 06:10 PM
1

Does discussing minorities in these conversations suggest minorities are inherently oppressed and subjugated to white people universally?
/r/MensRights09/01/22 12:03 PM
-23

Showing how minorities suffer in relation to wages, Healthcare, and incarceration really shows how noticeable white privilege is. Well written article.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 11:54 AM
-5

No one going to call out the obvious sexism? Sigh...
/r/MensRights09/01/22 11:40 AM
9

The article you posted did not say that 71 percent of physical violence is initiated by women. I think you misunderstood. Though it did say "1.5 million women and 835 000 men are physically assaulted or raped by intimate partners in the United States annually" I am guessing the quote that confused you, was "Among relationships with nonreciprocal violence, women were reported to be the perpetrator in a majority of cases (70.7%)". But this is not 71 percent of ALL cases. It's 71 percent of cases o…
/r/MensRights09/01/22 11:33 AM
-9

I think the SPLC just hates misogyny. As we all do.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 02:58 AM
1

Men have one single fault and he does not get dates from women. In fact, he is treated like a contagious disease. Is this true though? Or is every single married man in the world literally perfect? The hyperbole can be a bit much here.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 02:52 AM
-11

The article you posted about the manosphere says "It has also been associated with online harassment and has been implicated in radicalizing men into misogynist beliefs and the glorification of violence against women"
/r/MensRights09/01/22 02:50 AM
-13

The SPLC describes the manosphere as "The so-called "manosphere" is peopled with hundreds of websites, blogs and forums dedicated to savaging feminists in particular and women, very typically American women, in general. Although some of the sites make an attempt at civility and try to back their arguments with facts, they are almost all thick with misogynistic attacks that can be astounding for the guttural hatred they express. What follows are brief descriptions of a dozen" I think they mean th…
/r/MensRights09/01/22 01:51 AM
-1

" there IS a war on White men " " I think the level of violence carried out by males AS males and Whites AS Whites will stay at the same low level that it is at now." Seems that's exactly what you said so i don't see how "there is a war on white men but don't think white men will respond with anything violent." Is a misrepresentation. I think you're just kind of angry now and looking for reasons to be angry. But it's that angry white man persona the article was warning against.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 12:43 AM
-1

So you agree there is a war on white men but don't think white men will respond with anything violent. I hope you're right.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 12:32 AM
-10

So you DONT agree that white males will be more violent as the war on them continues?
/r/MensRights09/01/22 12:07 AM
-7

The shooter said ""Aggro white males ARE violent & will be more violent as they are made irrelevant by a country that HATES them" before his spree. I think anyone that thinks like that is a threat to society. And that's exactly the thinking of someone that believes there is a war on white men.
/r/MensRights08/01/22 11:50 PM
-20

Seems like they are blaming toxic online spaces that are rife with misogyny and racism perpetuating the idea that there is a war on white men. Like this Or this
/r/MensRights08/01/22 10:47 PM
5

Out of the 625 case studies regarding abuse of adolescent girls, 27 percent were done by the father. The highest percent of any other individual relationship. It's certainly not never happening as it's happening for too frequently. Though as the article states, it is far less talked about. Article
/r/MensRights08/01/22 06:03 PM
-16

The main issue with this, imo, is that it's another avenue women have made that allows the subject to complain about society, probably the "patriarchy" in many cases, while also secretly bragging about their own good looks or success with the opposite gender. But wouldn't that be two different groups of women? One complaining about how the patriarchy offers advantages to pretty women due to women being viewed primarily by looks, and the other group bragging about their good looks and success wit…
/r/MensRights08/01/22 02:33 PM
-2

Not even just feminists that do it, a lot of men do it too. Wouldn't that just be male feminists that do it? Or are feminists only women?
/r/AntiFeminists08/01/22 10:21 AM
5

What I don’t understand is why my school didn’t expel the girl I think because they need proof to expel someone.
/r/MensRights08/01/22 02:28 AM
-4

I never said there was no sexism against men in the family court system. I simply gave the statistic that things are getting much better. I don't know why that offends you.
/r/MensRights07/01/22 11:03 PM
-5

In the most recent year data was available in Canada, over 53 percent of contested cases resulted in shared custody. This is certainly moving in the right direction as the majority of men fighting for custody will get shared custody. Proof
/r/MensRights07/01/22 10:22 PM
-12

Being attracted to someone because of their youth or their money is perfectly normal.
/r/MensRights07/01/22 08:27 PM
-9

Let's be real. Do you think when Chris Brown beat tf outta Rhianna she was just making a sandwich in the kitchen? If only she was in the kitchen making a sandwich she wouldn't have been assaulted... This is some next level misogyny. It's not even covert anymore.
/r/MensRights07/01/22 06:36 PM
-10

This is truly terrifying and should be deleted.
/r/MensRights07/01/22 06:34 PM
-1

You've experienced that all women will despise you for displaying emotion? You can't possibly have met all women so how could such a large generalization be someone's lived experience?
/r/MensRights07/01/22 06:33 PM
-22

If it should be that men are forbidden to follow an escalating conflict to its apex and conclusion, women should be forbidden to escalate that conflict in the first place. Translation: If it's illegal for men to hit women, it should be illegal for women to make men mad.
/r/MensRights07/01/22 05:36 PM
-2

But wouldn't you assume the gender that represents the VAST majority of suicides is the gender that has more trouble controlling their emotions? Or the gender responsible for the majority of violent crime? What stat indicates women have a harder time controlling emotions?
/r/MensRights07/01/22 11:41 AM
-3

This was OPS story. And his parents were together. How is his mom spending 99 percent of the time with him, a fault of family court?
/r/MensRights07/01/22 11:16 AM
-5

People don't react when a woman hits a man because people assume a man can take care if himself and advocate for his own rights. If a woman hits a child, people react. So it's not that women are allowed to hit. It's that no one cares when men are hit. Which is an obvious problem.
/r/MensRights07/01/22 11:14 AM
1

Except the issue is women are against taking a name that ISNT an identifier of their paternal lineage. They are specifically being asked to change away from their name identifying their paternal lineage and many women don't want to. Also, if 99 out of 100 times a child is with their mother, is it really a surprise to anyone mothers get more custody rights?
/r/MensRights07/01/22 10:44 AM
-12

I wish I didn't go look at that. Gross.
/r/MensRights07/01/22 10:14 AM
-12

1 in 8 people think women are too emotional to hold office. I think there is still pressure on women to control their emotions. Proof
/r/MensRights07/01/22 10:05 AM
-23

The vast majority of women will not despise you for discussing your feelings assuming your feelings are not offensive to women. This is an unfair generalization that is not based on any facts.
/r/MensRights07/01/22 10:01 AM
1

Is incel anyone who is involuntarily celibate? Or is incel anyone that identifies as an incel and engages in the subculture of misogyny and hatred for women that incels are known for?
/r/MensRights07/01/22 12:24 AM
-6

How exactly are women depriving you of the right to enjoy life for 21 years? And do you think women instituted the draft? And women aren't responsible for circumcision. Are there even female mohels?
/r/MensRights07/01/22 12:11 AM
-46

The power of a king! Although not enough power to loiter in a store since they always run away before the cops get there.
/r/MensRights06/01/22 11:32 PM
-8

I understand the metaphor. I think its stupid and comparing your lived experience to that of slaves is offensively dumb and dismissive of generations of suffering.
/r/MensRights06/01/22 10:08 PM
-14

Comparing women to slave owners during slavery? Really?
/r/MensRights06/01/22 10:01 PM
-10

What rights do specifically women hold the keys to?
/r/MensRights06/01/22 10:00 PM
2

There's no statistic that shows every child raised by a single mother is not good. It's not a fact and thinking it is concerns me. My wife was raised by a single mother. Do you have a statistic that proves she's not good?
/r/MensRights06/01/22 05:35 PM
8

I guess this being misogyny is a better descriptor. That's fair.
/r/MensRights06/01/22 04:57 PM
-3

Someone said something positive about women and you are immediately trying to refute it. Why is that?
/r/MensRights06/01/22 03:05 PM
-7

Does someone who is so against single moms that they say they are literally incapable of raising good children not count as an incel? Is there a better term for that person?
/r/MensRights06/01/22 03:03 PM
-11

Single mums don't nurture good children implies 100 percent of children aren't good. Not they are more likely to be bad.
/r/MensRights06/01/22 02:39 PM
1

Those are well thought out criticism and I appreciate those insights.
/r/MensRights06/01/22 02:38 PM
-12

Single mum's don't nurture good children it's just the facts I mean this is some crazy incel stuff right? Why is this being upvoted?
/r/MensRights06/01/22 01:38 PM
2

I'm hypocritical because I believe this study should not impact judges, juries or public opinion of others women? Not really. I think it's hypocritical to think it should affect people's view of a gender.
/r/MensRights06/01/22 01:36 PM
-3

Is there proof she is a liar. Or is this a guilty until proven innocent type scenario?
/r/MensRights06/01/22 01:34 PM
0

Challenging social/societal preconceptions in regards to fathers being considered as equally viable parents? I don't think .00009 percent of the population changes my perception of the other 99.999991 percent. I'm surprised you feel that it should change perception.
/r/MensRights06/01/22 12:15 PM
-1

This post that was just made contradicts a lot of what you said. How sure are you? Reddit link
/r/MensRights06/01/22 11:47 AM
-13

Other people's actions should have NO EFFECT on family court rulings. You agree right? So why should the people that kill children have any effect on rulings?
/r/MensRights06/01/22 11:27 AM
0

What I'm saying is that sometimes the mum is the better parent, sometimes the dad. Sometimes both. Right. So each case shoukd be evaluated based on the information available and some woman killing her child in another country has NO bearing on that ruling.
/r/MensRights06/01/22 11:25 AM
-20

What preconception does this challenge? We are dealing with. 000009 percent of the population. How should that small of a sample size challenge preconceived notions? It would be like saying men being serial killers should be considered in family court since twice as many men are serial killers.
/r/MensRights06/01/22 10:59 AM
-1

So you feel these women that murdered their children is a reflection on all women and the courts should take that into consideration? Do you feel a man that rapes a woman is a reflection on all men and shoukd be considered in future rape trials?
/r/MensRights06/01/22 10:57 AM
-13

Question 41e on the NCVS, the most common victimization survey in Canada, is 'have you been the victim of a rape, attempted rape, or sexual attack'? You're attempts to dismiss it as biased without even knowing what it says you've already made your mind up on what you want to believe and you just tell yourself what you need to to maintain those beliefs. That's not a healthy outlook. But i suppose what can you expect from the guy that said this
/r/MensRights06/01/22 10:22 AM
-13

So you don't believe all the victimization surveys that say men have been raped either?
/r/MensRights06/01/22 10:16 AM
-13

Is there any evidence that this was a false allegation? Or is it just as possible this woman is being sued for telling the truth?
/r/MensRights06/01/22 09:58 AM
-9

There is 0 evidence to suggest the rate of false allegations is higher than the rate of rape. Most rapes are reported in anonymous victimization surveys. Why would millions of people lie on a victimization survey? And why would that data be repeated every year running the same survey? Pushing the the idea that there are more false accusations than rapes cannot be backed up by facts and is a downright foolish thing to say. Making outlandish claims to discredit rape victims isn't what mens rights …
/r/MensRights06/01/22 09:57 AM
7

"Bae showed up at a recent feminist rally​​ dressed as the Joker from “Batman” comics and toting a toy water gun. He followed female protesters around, pretending to, as he put it, “kill flies.”" I don't think shooting women protesting discrimination with a water gun and pretending to kill them should be deemed as progress. Seems more like a regressive step backwards in that it makes the mens rights movement look like unhinged psychopaths. Dressing up as a murderer from a movie and pretending to…
/r/MensRights06/01/22 09:51 AM
-44

Does this really have anything to do with mens rights or is this more of a 'check this out women are bad' post?
/r/MensRights06/01/22 09:46 AM
-4

4 articles with multiple studies showing the family court system is not biased in favour of women. One showing that 91 percent of custody decisions are made without even using the family court. Another showing judges usually side with the father when women claim that the father is abusive. Another saying "A Massachusetts study examined 2,100 fathers who asked for custody and pushed aggressively to win it. Of those 2,100, 92 percent either received full or joint custody" I imagine this stockpile …
/r/MensRights06/01/22 09:39 AM
-8

I only read 1 of those articles but they don't come to that conclusion at all. Are you just believing what people are saying without bothering to read the article?
/r/MensRights05/01/22 10:33 PM
-10

This says 46 percent of adult men in prison for any crime were abused by a female. And that 78 percent of adult women I'm jail were abused by a male. That's not quite the same as your claim. And the second article was just that abused people are more likely to sexually abuse people. No mention of gender. I don't know of any of those really prove your claim. Did you read them? Which of the studies should I read?
/r/MensRights05/01/22 09:56 PM
-1

That would be a very Interesting statistic. Specifically women that abused them? Not just abused in general? Do you have a source for this?
/r/MensRights05/01/22 08:55 PM
0

I guess it's easier to just make accusations than actually defend your position that I'm a liar or explain how any of the comments you posted are lies.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 07:52 PM
-1

Yeah. None of those are lies. Just things I said that you don't like. I'm sure you understand the difference. I get your upset that my opinion is different than yours but just claiming I lie seems kind of childish.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 07:27 PM
-14

Lol. The post is suggesting it wasn't slut shaming but you're just leaning right in with a pro-slut shaming stance eh?
/r/MensRights05/01/22 07:03 PM
-1

Well, you'll have to provide proof of a lie for me to agree with that statement. My post history is public, help yourself
/r/MensRights05/01/22 06:57 PM
-4

I didn't lie or misrepresent anyone. I asked a question that was unnecessarily loaded. A question can't be a lie or misrepresentation. Those need to be statements.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 06:47 PM
-4

It was an obvious joke based in ambiguous wording. And calling someone out for saying this is acceptable. Everyone should call that person out. The first link you posted was a admittedly loaded question that was probably unfairly phrased. Though I don't have a problem with laws against misogyny.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 06:23 PM
-1

And after they turn 18 you can't abort them anymore? Cutting it off at the 72nd trimester seems a bit lax.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 04:56 PM
-12

"Seeing how "hoe phase" has a lot of room for interpretation: If it includes hookups with people you actually engage with and know, this is very different from sleeping with guys you barely know. I, personally, would not be impressed if my GF (assuming you ever want a relationship again) spent time sleeping with random guys." Do you tend to grill new partners about how well they knew all their previous sexual partners? Because if not, you'd never get this information so what would it matter? If …
/r/MensRights05/01/22 04:43 PM
-7

Burn on them. That will show them for... wait what did they do? Just be women? Is that why we are insulting them? Because...that's probably not okay.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 01:46 PM
1

Posts about women like this have nothing to do with mens rights. It's just a jumping off point for the misogynists. Without knowing these women at all comments like, "I can see some ugly women is gonna get very jealous of them." "Wait, these are considered attractive?" "The one on the right is a dude..dude" No context about who these women are, anything they've ever done, or anything. And obvious insults thrown at them. Why? Because....they're women and an article made them mad. Pure rage bait f…
/r/MensRights05/01/22 01:44 PM
-5

I'm all for holding ALL corrupt CEOs accountable. Which is exactly what the author wants. Isn't that the definition of equality?
/r/MensRights05/01/22 12:55 PM
-12

I don't know, the new York times article specifically said "She should be held accountable for her actions as chief executive of Theranos.". It's hard to argue they are saying women can do no wrong when they are specifically saying she should be held accountable.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 11:05 AM
-11

He was found guilty. The verdict was appealed and a panel of 3 more judges found him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 10:50 AM
0

Some considered it hate speech when it was against white men. I guess it's free speech now that it's against women? Hate speech vs free speech
/r/MensRights05/01/22 12:21 AM
-5

Women need to open their legs more and serve men is not 'someone's truth'. Its vile hate.
/r/MensRights04/01/22 08:00 PM
-22

Hard to get an army of people to follow you without hate speech. Hate speed is a noxious weed that should be removed. Not defended.
/r/MensRights04/01/22 07:51 PM
-23

How much did Hitler do beyond saying words? Inciting violence and hate speech are very real crimes.
/r/MensRights04/01/22 07:42 PM
-26

No one should be defending this guy. He's human garbage and what he said was not only false, it was also morally reprehensible. Probably for the best if we condemn hateful men like this instead of defend them.
/r/MensRights04/01/22 07:12 PM
-1

Just to clarify. Liberals you talk to are for mass incarceration and extra sentences based on offenses done by men of the past? Who are these liberals? Lol. No one says this.
/r/MensRights04/01/22 02:08 PM
-5

anytime some slack jaw points to the disparity of races in the prison system There IS a disparity of race in the justice system though. It's quite clear and statistically proven. Why would someone be a 'slack jaw' for pointing this out?
/r/MensRights04/01/22 01:35 PM
-7

So you believe that every time a man has sex with a woman, he is a little less dateable each time? And that men with minimal sexual experience are the most appealing? Interesting.
/r/MensRights04/01/22 11:01 AM
4

You aren't racist for citing statistics. You're racist for bringing race up for no reason other than to be insulting when no one was discussing race.
/r/MensRights04/01/22 10:50 AM
-6

Wait... so what women say and what women want are different? That's a FACT? No it's not. It's a useless generalization. And body count doesn't matter. You're just hung up on dated principles of purity for women
/r/MensRights04/01/22 10:49 AM
-17

This is just a list of senseless generalizations and is not good advice. What women want and what women say they want are two different things This isn't true of most women. Body count matters and if she flakes or gets offended when ask, RUN!!... No it doesn't. Last but not least; If she came from a single parent household and leans left politically then she'll most likely be the sort of woman that will divorce grape you without even batting an eye. Being from a single parent household or your p…
/r/MensRights04/01/22 10:19 AM
25

This is all good advice but 'they should not see themselves as victims' raises a tricky issue. If a woman sees herself as a victim of a patriarchal society, she becomes less dateable. But if a man views himself as a victim of gyocentric society as in this post, is he less dateable as well?
/r/MensRights04/01/22 10:06 AM
-12

Hitting on anyone in their place of business is not appropriate. They shouldn't have to juggle a customer / service role and a personal role. It is very awkward to dance that line and putting anyone in that position is a bad call. Maybe feminism ruined women in the west. Maybe you deserved the glares and the woman from North Africa could use a little more feminism.
/r/MensRights03/01/22 08:13 PM
-26

Wow.... this probably should be downvoted. A lot. Yikes.
/r/MensRights03/01/22 03:25 PM
-12

Here's the link. https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/people/article/3155871/south-korean-women-fight-back-disillusioned-young-men-seek-cancel He's a famous you tuber. I imagine it's online, though not in English. And the fact that people don't like my opinion doesn't mean I'm lying. I've never lied and almost always back up my claims with proof.
/r/MensRights03/01/22 01:06 PM
-24

Bae Ing-gyu is one of the leaders of thr anti feminist movement with over 300,000 followers. He showed up to a rally against hatred for women dressed as the joker. He shot women with water guns and screamed that he was going to kill all the feminists there. When shooting them with water guns, he made them run and told them they are finally getting some exercise. This is not a good thing. This guy is a psychopath and makes the anti feminist crowd look like violent unhinged lunatics.
/r/MensRights03/01/22 10:25 AM
8

No. I don't think the post i linked was sexist at all. In fact, I'd be surprised if anyone other than you finds it sexist.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 08:52 PM
-8

So you believe this is a sexist post that suggests female suicide is acceptable? And that thousands of men upvoted this sexism?
/r/MensRights02/01/22 08:39 PM
-13

So you believe that ANY conversation about helping male homelessness or male suicide rates is inherently sexist against women?
/r/MensRights02/01/22 08:27 PM
16

Saying violence against women is unacceptable DOES NOT in ANY way mean the pope is saying violence against men is acceptable. When someone says domestic violence against men is disgusting, are they inherently saying domestic violence against women is acceptable? Obviously not. When someone says male homelessness is a problem, they are NOT saying female homelessness is acceptable. Too many people read into things in a way to purposefully be offended.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 08:17 PM
-41

"They have shown up whenever women rallied against sexual violence and gender biases in South Korea. Dozens of young men, mostly dressed in black, taunted the protesters, squealing and chanting, “Thud! Thud!” to imitate the noise they said the “ugly feminist pigs” made when they walked." Anyone showing up to rallies against sexual violence to call women fat should probably rethink their actions.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 07:29 PM
-2

When I posted this the top comments were a supportive of this clown. Luckily now, everyone has come in to say that this is stupid. I'm certainly glad we are mostly on the same page with this post being dumb.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 03:23 PM
-2

What in this comment generalized this sub? And I did not make this post to get karma. This is a weird conspiracy theory style comment when all you needed to do was acknowledge that you feel the post was inappropriate.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 03:06 PM
38

Can someone explain to me how some dude making rude generalizations about women on a dating app is related to mens rights? Can someone else explain why people are celebrating this behaviour? This is the trash you see on FDS but with men. Thats not a good thing. It's embarrassing.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 02:13 PM
-6

I see. You feel women on feminist subreddits and men on male subreddits should never be called out. Isn't this just asking for an echo chamber though?
/r/MensRights02/01/22 01:06 PM
2

So if I wrote an article and titled it 'why do men violently attack women?'. You wouldn't find that sexist? Really? I mean really?
/r/MensRights02/01/22 11:52 AM
-3

I had minimal complaints with the article. It's the click bait title I said was sexist. Because it obviously is.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 11:50 AM
-3

Lol. There is few things more telling then hundreds of upvotes to holding women accountable...and straight up downvotes for holding men accountable. As if sexism and mens problems are only on women to fix and men aren't part of the system at all.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 11:49 AM
9

You think in 5 to 10 years, feminism will be viewed as we view nazis now? That's.... pretty crazy and quite obviously never going to happen.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 11:47 AM
-5

Nothing. Why just call out women though? Shouldn't we call out all bad behaviour?
/r/MensRights02/01/22 11:45 AM
-23

Unnecessarily sexist click bait titles don't belong here. Would anyone here be okay with an article on FDS titled 'why do men cheat and gaslight women?' Obviously not. Because it's blatantly a sexist title. And so is this.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 11:38 AM
5

I consider it the same as when I'm called a white knight If standing up for a gender upsets you, you clearly have issues with that gender. Anyone calling someone a pick me or a white knight has issues they need to work out.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 11:27 AM
-32

People do get arrested for it Or here Or here But like most assaults like bar fights, cops do not usually press charges.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 11:04 AM
-31

Perhaps mens rights would get more support if people weren't writing diatribes about 'calling women out on their bull shit' and 'bringing women back down to reality'. That just reads as having issues with women and nothing you do with supporting men.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 02:06 AM
-3

The pope said not to abuse women...and you got offended. You really have to ask some tough questions about yourself if saying not to hit women offends you.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 10:49 PM
-6

Most gendered violence is inflicted on women. And black people are disproportionately hurt by the justice system. Those are facts whether you like them or not.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 10:38 PM
-12

Shouldn't the name of this group be 'humans rights' and not mens rights? Wouldn't that be more humanitarian? No. Focusing on specific groups that need help is perfectly appropriate. And getting upset over it because it's not your group is why the 'all lives matter' people get made fun of.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 10:25 PM
-1

The pope says he doesn't think people should hit women. It's strange what people choose to get upset over.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 09:46 PM
10

It was deleted because it was a direct copy of a post from less than a day ago. One that is still up and wasn't censored at all. Seen here Everyone wants to be a victim. Also, which of These comments were angry?
/r/MensRights01/01/22 08:10 PM
-5

Everyone here agreed that the woman doing this was entitled.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 05:59 PM
-5

You're against BLM too? Yikes...
/r/MensRights01/01/22 03:12 PM
-2

Why do people think shameful and childish generalizations about women counts as mens rights?
/r/MensRights01/01/22 03:08 PM
-2

You continue your crusade to get violent woman batteries out of jail as soon as possible. If you think that's supportive of men's right, you don't care about men. You just hate women.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 03:06 PM
-1

It specifically says if gender is determined to be a motive. It doesn't redefine it to all violence against women. Are you lying or did you not read it? "From Saturday 1 January the definition of gender violence will be broadened to include the murder of any woman or children in which gender is deemed to have played a role."
/r/MensRights01/01/22 03:04 PM
1

No. The motives determine likelihood to reoffend. Motive is important in sentencing. Ignoring it is a very very bad idea.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 03:03 PM
-3

Does saying violence against women is wrong mean you think violence against men is okay? Obviously not. Does saying we should have domestic abuse centre's for men mean you think we don't need domestic abuse centre's for women? Obviously not. People looking for a reason to be offended will always find it.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 03:03 PM
-9

Strawman argument because you got caught trying to defend men that hit women. Embarrassing.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 02:59 PM
-7

GBV is basically defined as something men do to women and requiring worse penalties for men only. This does hurt men. Obviously you don't care. You mean it requires worse penalties for men that violently hurt women? Is that a problem for you?
/r/MensRights01/01/22 02:46 PM
-12

There's nothing in that article about sentencing men and women differently. But somehow I'm the one lying? Why make something like that up?
/r/MensRights01/01/22 02:36 PM
2

What exactly did the pope do or say to suggest he is caught up in 'false misandry'? We all agree violence against women is wrong. How is the pope wrong for saying it?
/r/MensRights01/01/22 01:59 PM
-3

So once you hit 40, neither gender gets together because the only need is to reproduce? Wrong. And you know that's wrong. Relationships are for FAR more than reproduction and your belittling the female role to spitting out babies is just as reductive. Be better.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 01:55 PM
-21

Fighting against gender based violence doesn't hurt men in any way. Women face gender based violence at far higher rates than men do around the world and speaking out against it should not be viewed as a negative. https://www.unhcr.org/gender-based-violence.html Men face violence too. No one disagrees with that. But gender based violence is a particular type of violence that is socially created and needs to be stopped by prominent speakers in society. The pope included.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 01:51 PM
-5

Anyone who suggests women have a 'sell by date' is not looking for a partner to share their life. They are looking for a piece of meat to enjoy. It's a disgusting analogy that screams unhealthy views of women.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 11:54 AM
-23

Apparently I’m donwplaying “actual” rape and I’m also an apologist! Good ol’ Reddit logic! Does it count as 'reddit logic' when No one agreed with this person and everyone else agreed that it was a horrible act? Seems 'reddit logic' was that this wasn't rape but a horrifying and immoral act. One person's dumb opinion doesn't really represent reddit.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 11:47 AM
15

These men all agreed that men care about how many men women have slept with.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 03:48 AM
-1

The definition of femicide is killing of a woman based on her gender. Which is EXACTLY what Spain is tracking now They WERE tracking femicide incorrectly. Now it's correct.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 01:46 AM
1

There is zero evidence they are doing this and that's not what the article said at all. Making that up so you can be the victim is weird.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 01:39 AM
0

How is calling it femicide when someone particularly targeted gender misleading and biased? It's literally the exact same criteria as hate crime laws in every country that has them.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 01:16 AM
-4

But you realize that's just a conspiracy theory right? As in, there's no reason to think they would do that because it doesn't help anyone. You're just randomly deciding this is bad because you're afraid of it for some reason. If data collection in Spain scares you, life won't be easy.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 01:04 AM
-6

There's nothing there to suggest they will purposefully misrepresent violence to portray a sense of men murdering women. This is just an assumption you're making. This is no different from when they decided to track hate crimes.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 12:27 AM
0

There are more male murderers than female murderers everywhere in the world. That can't possibly be a surprise to you.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 12:00 AM
0

Of course I wouldn't be against male homeless initiatives.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 11:49 PM
-1

Well, the very small number of female murderers would be an indicator. But you're right.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 11:46 PM
-23

Would you be against a program targeting male homelessness? Focusing on the areas that are bigger problems makes perfect sense. There should be more male homelessness programs.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 11:01 PM
0

Whereas killing a man is apparently not much of a crime. Killing a man carries a murder sentence in Spain and is one of their harshest penalties for crimes. I don't know why you would think the state feels otherwise.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 10:33 PM
-10

If you have evidence to suggest misandry murders are a problem in Spain and the data should be meticulously tracked, I'd be interested to see it
/r/MensRights31/12/21 10:32 PM
-34

Oh it's not not gender neutral. Because Spain has decided misogyny is leading to more crimes than misandry. Not sure if that's true but that's certainly the opinion of legislators in Spain.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 10:16 PM
0

Correction, any man who kills a woman I'm which gender was determined to be a motivator. Much like killing someone because they are black carries harsher sentences. Killing a woman just because you hate women carries a larger sentence. I'm not sure people who kill women because they hate women are a group people should be defending.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 10:14 PM
1

There's nothing in the article about jail time or that killing a woman will get more jail time than a man. Why do you think this is the case?
/r/MensRights31/12/21 09:51 PM
-54

Spain, according to the article will now count any murder of a woman by a man as femicide even if the murder wasn’t due to victim’s sex Except that's not what the article says. The articles says 'From Saturday 1 January the definition of gender violence will be broadened to include the murder of any woman or children in which gender is deemed to have played a role.' Edit: the mob has spoken. Misquoting the article to make it look like an attack on men gets upvotes. Direct quote from the article …
/r/MensRights31/12/21 09:50 PM
-15

Police in Spain have changed how they quantify statistics regarding men that murder women based on gender. Does this really matter for mens rights? I can't see how this is a problem for any men other than potentially convicted murderers that may face more time because of their targeted hate.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 09:12 PM
-3

Sigh. Okay. I'll adjust. If a man tells a woman that her husband is having an affair...and she kills him. Who is to blame? The woman that killed him, or the man that told her about the affair?
/r/MensRights31/12/21 07:45 PM
-95

Clearly women are more violent. Of 30 murderers, 29 were men and one was a woman.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 05:54 PM
-5

If a woman kills her sleeping husband because he was cheating on her, she never would have done it if he didn't cheat on her. Does that mean the murder is his fault? If only the man did what he should have done and be faithful, the woman wouldn't have done what she did. So by your logic it's his fault. You're responsible for your own actions. Trying to blame some idiot woman because you went and got a shotgun to start a pissing contest is embarrassing. You're accountable for your own actions and…
/r/MensRights31/12/21 05:28 PM
2

I see. It's not HIS fault for being a violent pit bull. It's HER fault for keeping a violent pit bull around. I reiterate, the lack of accountability is astounding.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 02:21 PM
-9

Millions of people get into custody fights every day. It's one of the most common arguments in the world. But in this case, without any proof, you just know deep down that she orchestrated all this on purpose? That doesn't seem like a stretch to you?
/r/MensRights31/12/21 02:15 PM
1

If they can prove she directly manipulated him to kill the guy yeah. But if all they can prove is that she was disobeying a court order.... obviously not. An accusation like that requires proof. Did she tell him to go get the gun? To brandish it? To get up in his face? Certainly not on the video.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 02:03 PM
20

It's a complete and utter lack of accountability. Imagine getting into a fight, going inside to get a gun, coming back outside, screaming at a dudes face while holding a gun, and then shooting the ground near the guy...and when he fights back, it's somehow your girlfriends fault when you kill him. The lack of accountability is astounding.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 01:58 PM
15

True. They seem to only include homicides done by the intimate partners in the intimate partner homicide stats. They never include murders done by other people.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 01:19 PM
-14

I read the original post. I wouldn't want to name my baby after a man that banged his coworker the whole time I was pregnant either.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 12:56 PM
-25

2 men fighting over a shotgun and posturing for 10 minutes... but somehow it's the woman's fault? That's some serious mental gymnastics that I'm having trouble understanding. The idiot that went to get the gun could have easily not done that. The idiot that didn't leave when the gun was brought out could have easily walked away. There was AMPLE time for either man to walk away from that situation and neither did. And somehow it's her fault because she was acting like a bitch? She should be punis…
/r/MensRights31/12/21 12:30 PM
8

People are shitty and do things like that all the time . Check this example out
/r/MensRights31/12/21 03:49 AM
-1

Yeah. People and groups are complicated so it's important to view them holistically instead of by individual actions.
/r/MensRights30/12/21 05:34 PM
-2

Wasn't it also feminist organizations in countries like India and Israel that raise literacy rates among women and provide safe access to sexual health?
/r/MensRights30/12/21 05:29 PM
0

Uhhh. What. I specifically said neither gender should be victim blamed. Is equality only for feminists now?
/r/MensRights30/12/21 04:05 PM
1

Telling him men should be taught not to be violent wouldn't be good. Obviously.
/r/MensRights30/12/21 02:51 PM
-10

What evidence do you have to suggest these studies were done by feminists? Just that you don't like the results?
/r/MensRights30/12/21 02:04 PM
-3

Right. But when a woman goes into a police station with a black eye, you must understand how saying 'well perhaps we should teach women like you not to be violent so your man wouldn't have to hit you' is not the appropriate response. I
/r/MensRights30/12/21 12:46 PM
-8

I don't think otherwise okay for anyone to hit anyone . My issue was with you blaming women when they are hit hit saying the best way to prevent violence is to tell women they were asking for it
/r/MensRights30/12/21 11:59 AM
-1

But you said the BEST way to prevent violence against women was to correct female behaviour. Isn't that exactly the same as saying the best way to prevent violence against women is to teach women to act right so men don't have to hit them? That doesn't seem messed up to you?
/r/MensRights30/12/21 11:48 AM
-18

Woman hits man. Hits man again. Hits him again. And again. And again. Slaps him. Punches him. Kicks him. Throws a shoe at him. A dish. A cup. Punch. Slap. Hit. Finally, the man says "ENOUGH!" and slaps her. Wails! Cries! Tears! Shrieks! Sobs! "How can he do this to poor little me?" she sobs. "I'm just a little woman!" The best way to prevent violence against women is to teach women not to hit. Wow. You're just openly saying the women being hit were asking for it and it's their fault eh? This is …
/r/MensRights30/12/21 11:20 AM
-18

I dunno study from America said twice as many women experience physical violence. You can not believe the study if you want. I just think picking and choosing which data to believe is a bad approach.
/r/MensRights30/12/21 11:13 AM
-8

Like how Paul elam represents mens rights more than anyone here? And everything he says is the true mens rights?
/r/MensRights30/12/21 11:09 AM
-11

Well, I guess it's the thousands of feminists from reddit versus one woman that everyone disagrees with on this topic. Who represents feminism more?
/r/MensRights30/12/21 11:01 AM
-5

Lol. I posted proof that feminists Support the idea that men can be raped. Not much of a debate when the proof is posted. One woman you don't like saying otherwise doesn't amount to proof... obviously
/r/MensRights30/12/21 10:58 AM
-17

But according to this data from victimization surveys, women are victims of domestic violence more. How do you determine which one is more accurate? Or just decide which one to believe based on what you want to be true? This one from america shows that when only talking SEVERE domestic violence, women are FAR more often the victims. With all this data, how do you decide what to believe?
/r/MensRights30/12/21 10:47 AM
-11

Defending obvious criminals and downplaying their crimes is disgusting. This was another example of the same thing Do you have any links to articles you feel downplayed her crimes? The ones I looked up made it clear that she was an integral part of the abuse and not just a facilitator. The women that testified at her trial made it clear she was very very guilty.
/r/MensRights30/12/21 10:08 AM
-7

Perhaps 'feminism' encompasses many people with many opinions and it's not quite as easy to just say 'feminists think that'
/r/MensRights30/12/21 09:52 AM
-63

Feminists said the exact opposite here. Perhaps feminism is a bit more complicated than reducing it to a handful of women.
/r/MensRights30/12/21 03:11 AM
-95

How exactly is feminism teaching little girls that they can't rape anyone? It's an easy enough claim to make but I don't see the connection here.
/r/MensRights30/12/21 01:50 AM
10

The majority of teenagers on r/teenagers made it very clear that they've a been taught that sexually assaulting a man was wrong. I'd say that's a good thing.
/r/MensRights30/12/21 01:40 AM
1

What do you think teenagers on reddit should be doing to stop rape?
/r/MensRights30/12/21 01:06 AM
-21

True enough. Though, it's possible this poster is just a troll. As you can see
/r/MensRights30/12/21 12:18 AM
11

Are they being made to think that though? Because the overwhelming majority said men can obviously be raped Top comment on post
/r/MensRights30/12/21 12:01 AM
-22

How is this a false allegation? Doesn't there need to be proof it was a false allegation to make the claim that his accuser lied?
/r/MensRights29/12/21 09:23 PM
4

One woman's dumb opinion doesn't show 'female nature'. This is just as dumb as a feminist saying she was attacked by a man and that shows 'male nature'. This Is embarrassing. Delete this.
/r/MensRights29/12/21 06:03 PM
0

posted something about how all men bear responsibility, using the phrase “not all men, but enough.” Are you really saying all men bear responsibility when you literally say 'not all men'. The argument is not all men are violent, but enough are that precautions need to be taken. It's literally exactly the same as This post
/r/MensRights29/12/21 12:41 PM
-1

She was a 7 year old girl at the time. I can't imagine locking her up now for it is legal. After all, it was her that cleared his name. If we started locking people up, they'd never get their name cleared as people would just stay silent.
/r/MensRights29/12/21 11:23 AM
1

Actually, judges rarely believe the abuse claims in family court. Proof here
/r/MensRights29/12/21 11:21 AM
-1

This sounds dangerously close to suggesting the solution to body shaming men is public stonings. And obviously that's insane.
/r/MensRights29/12/21 10:49 AM
0

What do you want to say but would get cancelled on tiktok for saying? What male issues aren't allowed to be discussed there? That's pretty messed up.
/r/MensRights29/12/21 10:22 AM
0

Here's an idea.. maybe Feminists should get off their butts and take the misandrists within their ranks to task for their negative behavior and tell them that they need to do better.. Maybe then they will listen? Right. If left unchecked, a movement can very easily become a problem if they refuse to call people out when speaking negatively about a gender. That's why the people on this sub that call out the bad comments are the real heroes.
/r/MensRights29/12/21 10:18 AM
-5

Well it did. When women complain about the hookup culture I just laugh. You created it. First you said feminists created hookup culture. The you said women created it. Seems a lot of people have trouble differentiating feminists and women because they see both groups as the enemy. It's not a very healthy outlook.
/r/MensRights29/12/21 02:06 AM
29

FdS is hate filled garbage. Why would you want to engage in a male equivalent to that dumpster fire?
/r/MensRights28/12/21 11:46 PM
-1

'Any new hires after the new laws' So you just assume all women and minorities at executive levels are not as capable at their jobs as their white male counterparts? Isn't that kind of messed up?
/r/MensRights28/12/21 05:17 PM
-6

But how do you know which women at an executive level are quota hires and which are earned?
/r/MensRights28/12/21 04:57 PM
-8

How did me interpreting this comment that someone else made justify violence?
/r/MensRights28/12/21 04:56 PM
-6

What? I don't think insulting abusers and rapists is insulting to black people. No one does. This was a weird comment.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 03:03 PM
-12

What line of reasoning? I never justified any form of violence.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 03:02 PM
2

People say this because many jurisdictions define rape as being penetrated with a penis. And this man wasn't penetrated with a penis so he doesn't meet the legal criteria for rape. He was undoubtedly sexually assaulted though. Whether or not the law is fair is debatable but much like you can't call someone that committed manslaughter a convicted murderer, you can't call a sexual assaulter a rapist. At least not without the potential blowback if you're a media outlet.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 12:30 PM
-25

People should be truthful. But how is the fact that women are believed something women do to men? Studies suggest in a board room, men are believed more. Is that men treating women badly? No. Obviously not. So society believing women is not women treating men badly. It's society treating men badly and men and women are equally blamed.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 11:34 AM
2

I spent a month in Madeira and it seemed very tradcon and hyper religious to me. But it's always different as a tourist or a local.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 11:09 AM
-29

Again, the biggest problem is not that it happens - the problem is the massive double standards held by society which often (not always, but too often) assume that all accusations by women are true, and excuse women's behaviour in situations like this. Is this something women do to men? Is it women's fault that society believes them? How is the societal view of men something 'women do to men'.?
/r/MensRights28/12/21 11:06 AM
-7

None of these are things women are doing to men. They are things women get away with that men don't. Women don't control what society tolerates any more than men do. And women definitely don't make sex assault laws or create most gym policies. The post was about how women treat men. Not how society as a whole treats men.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 11:04 AM
4

Isn't this entire post a genrtalization of how women treat men? Even saying it is so bad how women treat men, that it would be seen as terrorism if men treated women that way?
/r/MensRights28/12/21 10:54 AM
-1

Never lied about my position. You just assumed my position based on a request for more info. And you're so desperate to be mad at me that you've tripled down on assuming my position despite me telling you otherwise. If people that think differently than you bother you so much, the internet may not be the place for you.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 10:21 AM
-4

I don't think they cancel you for a mistaken identities and accidentally going along with a police frame job
/r/MensRights28/12/21 10:17 AM
-7

I didn't call out any idea. I agree that shorter lesson sentences are better. I just wanted this person to clarify their stance. Clearly you don't like me but assuming my position and then getting argumentative doesn't help anyone
/r/MensRights28/12/21 10:13 AM
-33

How do 'women treat men' that could be construed as violent misandry and terrorism? Women treat men just fine in my opinion with some women being psychopaths. Just like men treat women just fine with some men being psychopaths. So how do you feel women treat men that is an issue? Edit: I'm anticipating a lot of downvotes here but also for no one to explain how 'women treat men' that is an issue.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 10:10 AM
-13

Where did I say equality was illegitimate? I asked them of simply letting criminals out of prison earlier was helpful to men. Its a pretty fair question. The response being that most criminals are non violent and drug offenses and I agree that they should all get out of jail sooner. That would be a win for men.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 10:06 AM
-104

The link above is about hating abusers and rapists. Not all men are abusers and rapists. If you think insulting abusers and rapists is insulting all men, you don't have a very high opinion of men.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 01:57 AM
-162

More of an anti-rapist view. Commenter was fine with a rapist having their junk caught off. It's unclear how she feels about men in general. Very clear that she hates rapists.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 01:50 AM
-66

Won't letting all men out sooner just mean more criminals on the streets? Is that a win for men?
/r/MensRights28/12/21 12:52 AM
-3

Guys can have their own gym. Just because someone hasn't opened one doesn't mean it's illegal. Though I don't think there's enough men that give a damn about females looking at them to make that a profitable business.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 02:17 PM
-4

Most mras blame feminism when they don't like a new James bond movie. Let's not pretend criticsm is all legitimate. It's the illegitimate criticism that I call out. I leave the legitimate criticism alone. Proof
/r/MensRights27/12/21 11:25 AM
-2

Right and your the type of feminist that doesn't like feminism. Not sure you should be answering questions directed at feminists. But I guess you'd rather go to another sub and play the victim rather than make your comments where you should. If you cared about debate, you'd follow the rules. You just want to say victim and say feminism bad.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 11:13 AM
-5

I don't defend feminism. I think making every post about feminism detracts from mens rights. I'm not a feminist but I don't believe whining about feminism being an invisible boogeyman does anything for men and I believe it's bad for the movement and men.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 11:08 AM
-9

So you're a feminist that doesn't believe feminism helps women?
/r/MensRights27/12/21 11:06 AM
-27

Supporting feminism.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 10:42 AM
-13

Can't you relay all those points in a comment that isn't a top level comment to abide by the subs rules? Or is that a problem for you? No one wants to silence you, just reserve top level comments for feminists that actually support feminism.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 10:39 AM
-1

So you too are a feminist? Why do you support feminism?
/r/MensRights27/12/21 10:38 AM
-10

So you are saying you are a feminist? What makes you identify as feminist with all the problems feminism has? Why are you on a mens rights sub when you are a feminist? The two don't have any common ground. Also, you should really reevaluate identifying as a feminist, it's not helping men.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 10:23 AM
-58

This is a site to ask feminists questions. If you are not a feminist, you shouldn't be answering people's questions. That's the entire point of the sub. If you went to a 'ask a doctor' subreddit, you'd want a doctor to be asking your question. At a 'ask feminists' subreddit, it should be feminists answering your question. Getting upset over a subreddits rules is not why MRAs struggle to find common ground with feminism. Edit: if you've posted in antifeminist like OP has, trying to say you are a …
/r/MensRights27/12/21 10:11 AM
-23

'People like her are the cultivators of toxic masculinity'. Sounds like she's dirrctly blaming her for toxic masculinity. Not the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 10:03 AM
16

I think women know that statement is vile. What makes you think otherwise?
/r/MensRights27/12/21 09:53 AM
-59

Wait... do you think for feminism to be about equality and be beneficial to men...they need to be addressing every single problem men have on a global scale? There's no need to desperately try to make every article about feminism.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 12:41 AM
9

In lebanon, women married to foreigners cannot pass their citizenship to their children. This has deprived many families of Healthcare and rights most nationals would have. Men are able to marry foreigners and pass their citizenship to their children but women legally are not. Not to mention women are twice as likely to be illiterate than men in Lebanon. Doesn't mean women are treated like shit but there are obviously some problems there.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 07:52 PM
0

This is embarrassing. Comparing a word that makes some men upset to a word that was used to oppress and enslave people for centuries is so beyond tone deaf that it's sad.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 06:57 PM
-2

The top comments on that post were : "She double-dipped" "Normally, I'm against smushing cake in people's faces, but in this case I'll make an exception" "gross and entitled" "Fun fact! This also qualifies as r/trashy" "What a bitch" "Yeeeeeeah, I'd be walking around and tossing it in her face. Money well spent." "She should pay for their cake and his meal" The response on reddit was to hold a dumb idiot accountable for her actions. What you MEANT to say, is that you combed through comments unti…
/r/MensRights26/12/21 03:50 PM
3

What do you feel should have been said in the comments that wasn't?
/r/MensRights26/12/21 03:14 PM
6

There's 1200 upvotes on "YTA. Kids have been KILLED because of parents doing this. Knock that shit off. Wtf is wrong with you" Does that sound like it's just a minor mistake to you?
/r/MensRights26/12/21 03:08 PM
3

Everyone is in agreement that the mother is the asshole here. Not sure what more you wanted beyond that....
/r/MensRights26/12/21 02:53 PM
-5

I think mens lib shuts down dialogue on feminism because when left unchecked, every third post is 'feminists say that men should be eradicated' like it's a fact. The reality is there are hundreds of millions of feminists that range from psychopaths to logical humans and these 'feminists say' posts are just petty bickering. If you look at the posts and comments here, the conversation about men obviously takes a back seat to the conversation about feminism and women. Posts about women killing thei…
/r/MensRights26/12/21 02:26 PM
-10

So you can stop fucking around with us and leave us at peace for once Isn't the whole problem that women are leaving 90 percent of men alone and not fucking around with them? Didn't women ready stop fucking around with men?
/r/MensRights26/12/21 12:09 PM
-12

So in this story... the thirsty men making inappropriate comments to a cosplay woman are the good guys. And the other guys that are telling men not to be hypersexual towards a woman that didn't ask for that are the 'white knights' that need to be stopped? If white knights are just people that tell men when they are being a bit too much, are white knights really a problem?
/r/MensRights26/12/21 06:27 AM
-2

What if women aren't having their needs for a rich partner met? Should they be attacked and demonized for hypergamy or treated with compassion?
/r/MensRights26/12/21 01:34 AM
-11

I dunno, this post was pretty much exactly that "when 27% of men in their 20's haven't had sex as an adult and you realize you're probably doing better than at least 50% of men and your dating life is still trash, it gets to a point when you have to realize the problem isn't men needing to work on themselves, it's a serious sexual power imbalance that is creating desperate men and shitty, entitled women who never have any pressure to grow up and develop as people."
/r/MensRights26/12/21 12:18 AM
1

Forced envelopement is sexual assault. Forced pentration is rape. They are both crimes punishable by imprisonment they just have different names. If calling them both sexual assault is seen as equal, than many countries are equal under the law. Like Canada and Australia which have removed rape as a crime altogether and just use sexual assault to cover everything.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 06:46 PM
-3

Yeah. I guess calling out an entire gender for things only some men do is a bad call. You just seemed very supportive of calling out women for things only some women do which is why I asked. Seems weird to be okay with one and not the other.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 04:42 PM
-5

The OP has the balls to call out women on their shitty behavior. How did you feel when Gillette did a commercial calling men out on their shitty behaviour? Was it sexist? Or werre you impressed with their 'balls'?
/r/MensRights25/12/21 04:25 PM
2

I thought British law's definition made it impossible for a woman to meet the legal definition of rape. Can she plead guilty to it anyway? British law makes it impossible for a woman to meet the definition of rape..on her own. Rape requires sexual penetration with a penis. Which means a woman cannot be charged with rape unless she has a penis. However much like hiring a hit man will get you a murder charge, facilitating a rape can probably get you a rape charge. It's not that women can't be char…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/12/21 04:03 PM
1

I dunno. Feminists seem to say the exact opposite. Are you sure? Proof
/r/MensRights25/12/21 03:05 PM
3

Where was sexism called out in that post? Also, what did anyone do that was sexist?
/r/MensRights25/12/21 02:57 PM
0

I dunno. People seem pretty triggered over mansplaining and manspreading and those are words containing 'man'. In fact, almost 1000 people upvoted This post saying that those terms made them want to commit suicide.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 02:06 PM
-8

But insults weren't hurled at the people saying these things. They were hurled at women collectively. Wouldn't it make more sense to attack the people saying these things instead of women as a whole?
/r/MensRights25/12/21 01:57 PM
-11

I see. So its shitting on men if some woman tweets it. But if a man does it its okay. What if that woman tweeted it because of something sexist she saw? Does that make it okay? An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 01:42 PM
3

Graham Morant was convicted of this same thing. He's not famous all over the internet at all. But he did get a 10 year sentence.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 12:48 PM
-5

I never disagreed. I'm just clarifying that you feel making prejudicial statements is okay in this case. It's fine if you do. I'm not here to judge.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 12:24 PM
-5

I see. So its prejudicial but in this case it's okay to be prejudice.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 12:21 PM
-19

People really liked the comment 'I guess that means I like women, but without the ‘wo’!. Seems like people really like shitting on women too and are happy to applaud.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 12:18 PM
-7

One of the top comments here is the exact same joke. Seems like this type of humor is what everyone likes.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 12:15 PM
-7

I think the immediate comparisons between feminism and the KKK might tell you that not everyone has a firm grasp on the real world.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 04:26 AM
-3

The law is gender neutral. Man or woman, if you penetrate someone with your penis, you're going to jail for rape. This conviction proves that.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 04:08 AM
2

What about women that look like men? Should they be called men too and expecting otherwise of you is absurd? Or do you need to do genital inspections of all those close calls to make sure you aren't calling them the wrong one? What's orwellian is letting the state determine what gender you are instead of choosing yourself. Just call people what they would like to be called. Like you would with their name.
/r/MensRights24/12/21 10:10 PM
-5

Then this conviction is a sign of equality as they clearly have no problem charging a woman with rape when she meets the criteria.
/r/MensRights24/12/21 08:17 PM
9

The term 'rape' in the UK is reserved for forced penetration without consent. In this case, if this woman was charged with rape, it means that she forcibly pentrated a mouth, vagina, or anus, with her penis. It has nothing to do with who the victim is and everything to do what what was done to them.
/r/MensRights24/12/21 07:34 PM
-4

So you believe she is a murderer even without enough evidence to convict her? Does the not guilty verdict mean nothing to you and you still feel she is guilty?
/r/MensRights23/12/21 07:01 PM
-5

Why does he have to be 'the one' to be the main character. That's like saying the wizard of Oz is the main character in wizard of Oz. The most powerful person isn't the main character automatically.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 05:49 PM
0

They didn't have to. They chose to because they thought it would be a cool story and a surprising twist.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 04:01 PM
1

I don't think most people are okay with adult women sleeping with mid teenage boys. Most people find that pretty repulsive.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 02:53 PM
7

Yes. Neither of those people should be defended. Anyone preying on 17 year olds should not be defended. Regardless of their genitals.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 02:36 PM
5

Agreed. But I fail to see how defending Franco has anything to do with that.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 02:32 PM
-7

She 'got away with it' because the judge ruled that there wasn't enough evidence to convict her. Is innocent until proven guilty no longer a thing?
/r/MensRights23/12/21 02:31 PM
3

Franco actively tried to hook up with a girl he knew was 16. It's documented and there's pictures to prove it. It's not crazy that a man can get cancelled for being a predatory scum bag. It's very easy to search the proof on Google. Franco even admitted and apologized for it.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 02:28 PM
-18

I don't think Neo is a side character. Just because he wasn't the one doesn't mean his spotlight was stolen. I imagine he has more screen tine than anyone.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 01:56 PM
-11

What about the franchise neutered Neo? You didn't have anything of the sort in your synopsis. And Spiderman is about a man. The matrix is about a concept. Comparing them aren't the same.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 01:36 PM
-23

A man being the hero was okay but when a woman becomes the hero it's not okay to you? And it ruins the franchise? Why? Trinity was very cool in the originals but her being the hero ruins the franchise? Seems like a bit of an overreaction to be so obsessed with gender that only neo can be the hero of those movies or else the franchise is ruined.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 12:59 PM
-2

People did the same thing here. I don't know why people go out of their way to defend murderers. There was even 5 upvotes on This comment Saying the murder was 'not going too far'. This one literally says you can't blame him for killing his wife and ex girlfriend. Wow...
/r/MensRights23/12/21 10:16 AM
-15

Perhaps you were downvoted because 'can you imagine if the genders were switched' didn't add very much to the conversation. It might not be misandry that got you downvoted. It may just be that people on many subreddits are tired of people arguing about gender.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 12:12 AM
-10

Any logical person would say this result doesn't mean the r@pes didn't happen. No one will ever know what happened behind closed doors and assuming it happened without evidence is just as dumb as assuming it didn't happen without evidence.
/r/MensRights22/12/21 06:57 PM
-3

I've never posted anything on FDS. That subreddit is for fools.
/r/MensRights22/12/21 04:17 PM
-6

Right. But this is comparing men falsely accused of rape to women being raped. Both are horrifying so precautions are necessary.
/r/MensRights22/12/21 01:32 PM
-6

If asking people to support their opinions is considered hateful, what you want is an echo chamber.
/r/MensRights22/12/21 01:08 PM
-6

Just pointing out obvious hypocrisy of complaining about women celebrating violence against men when you have a documented history of celebrating violence against women. But yeah, I guess calling me names is easier than rational discussion.
/r/MensRights22/12/21 12:57 PM
-11

That all makes sense to me. Although he said she said doesn't lead that conviction in 95 percent of rape cases but thats not the point here. You agree that treating men on the street as potential rapists is fair too though right?
/r/MensRights22/12/21 12:44 PM
-22

Those aren't the same. But the comments here are not limited to situations of undressing and I think you can see that.
/r/MensRights22/12/21 12:42 PM
-55

Isn't treating all women like potential false accusers a discriminatory practice? Would this be any different than treating black people different than white people? That was the argument put forth when it comes to treating men like potential rapists. Seen here
/r/MensRights22/12/21 12:24 PM
23

Then your views are consistent and I respect that. And I agree with you. The phrase, better safe than sorry comes to mind. Extra precautions can hurt feelings. Not enough precautions can be devastating.
/r/MensRights22/12/21 12:15 PM
-6

So would you say This comment that you made on pussy pass denied is any different than celebrating the man in your post being hit?
/r/MensRights22/12/21 11:55 AM
-85

I'm not understanding your point. You're saying in today's social climate, assuming women are false accusers is okay but assuming men are potential rapists is not okay? Your point is that with social climate the way it is, it does make sense to pick and choose?
/r/MensRights22/12/21 11:47 AM
-60

I just don't see a difference between people celebrating in your post and people celebrating women getting punched on pussy pass denied. They both seem like trash people to me. So we agree that the people in your post are trash. And I assume we agree that the pussy pass denied people are trash for doing the same thing. So this isn't an argument. I believe we've found common ground.
/r/MensRights22/12/21 11:27 AM
-80

I'm not trying to get pussy. I'm happily married. I'm just pointing out problems with logic. But I suppose insulting me is easier than defending logic.
/r/MensRights22/12/21 11:20 AM
-165

Most people on this subreddit are against treating all men like potential rapists so it's surprising to see everyone supportive of treating all women like potential false accusers. Either both are okay or none are. It doesn't make sense to pick and choose.
/r/MensRights22/12/21 11:18 AM
-132

Can you imagine a group of people cheering on assaulting a woman that they feel deserved it? Wait, isn't that exactly what pussy pass denied is and it has 600,000 followers that celebrate every punch?
/r/MensRights22/12/21 11:13 AM
2

So you're against all hate crime laws? It's determined by a judge and jury if hate caused them to commit the crime. And if there is no other motives visible.
/r/MensRights22/12/21 11:06 AM
1

You're misunderstanding the intent of criminalizing them . You won't get arrested for a sexist joke. It would be mean if you commit a crime against a woman solely because you hate women, the charges against you would be greater. Like hate crime laws. If you're motives are pure hate for a race, sexuality or gender you should go to jail longer. As you are far less likely to be successfully rehabilitated.
/r/MensRights22/12/21 11:02 AM
11

I don't know Chris Noth. But it seems as though the people that do are immediately believing the accusations against him.
/r/MensRights21/12/21 09:27 PM
-44

I'm against body shaming women for no reason. That's makes me a decent human being. Not a troll.
/r/MensRights21/12/21 11:24 AM
-3

You're lashing out now because you obviously got caught body shaming. Unnecessarily. Saying you'd still mow down is an obvious attempt to say her vagina shape is lesser and you should be embarrassed about this post.
/r/MensRights21/12/21 11:00 AM
-7

Would still mow down Meaning despite the hairy meat curtains, you'd STILL mow down. Which obviously means you're describing it as a negative and now realizing you were body shaming her are,desperately trying to pretend you weren't.
/r/MensRights21/12/21 10:52 AM
-1

You said despite the hairy meat curtains you'd 'still' mow it down. Which is a clear indicator that you don't like hairy meat curtains. Trying to walk it back now and say it isn't an insult is sad.
/r/MensRights21/12/21 10:50 AM
-38

So you'd be okay with women mocking a man's penis shape? No So don't mock a woman's vagina shape. It's a pretty simple lesson to treat others how you want to be treated. No one wants to hear their vagina described as 'hairy meat curtains'. And I think you know that.
/r/MensRights21/12/21 10:48 AM
-11

So because trash media outlets body shame men, we are supportive of body shaming women? That seems petty and sad to me.
/r/MensRights21/12/21 10:35 AM
-91

Did Billie Eilish do something wrong? Is that why her emotional issues are being met with childish insults? Or is she just guilty of being a woman and therefor everyone is upvoting attacking her for being open about her issues?
/r/MensRights21/12/21 10:21 AM
-2

This was a pretty on point summary of what just transpired.
/r/MensRights21/12/21 10:13 AM
-13

You think male violence is caused by their mothers being neurotic? That's a bold approach. Have you seen any studies of such or is this just something you think is happening?
/r/MensRights21/12/21 10:07 AM
-3

By any objective metric I should be a top tier catch except that, despite popular misconception, women are actually more shallow than men and 80% of them are only interested in rich white guys with 6 packs. And many still think they have a God given right to marry up. Perhaps a 'top tier catch' doesn't make negative generalizations about the vast majority of women.
/r/MensRights21/12/21 02:25 AM
-4

Right. Which is why targeting the laws themselves makes more sense than targeting the media in these scenarios. The media doesn't have a choice because of the laws.
/r/MensRights20/12/21 12:23 PM
-20

That's because that's how the law works. It's not because of the media. The media can't just call things rape when it doesn't fit the legal criteria.
/r/MensRights20/12/21 11:32 AM
-1

Why is it so hard to understand???? I’m so sick of this double standard that media is pulling out of their aaa when it comes to boys, all they are saying is that kids can consent when they say “well the boy wanted it” Do you have examples of media saying kids can consent and that 'the boy wanted it'? That's a pretty repulsive thing to say about whichever media outlets that said it should be outed as being garbage.
/r/MensRights20/12/21 10:22 AM
37

This woman is. Not sure if all of them are.
/r/MensRights19/12/21 09:23 PM
-6

But he didn't say everyone should buy a poppy. Or everyone should support the troops. He said 'you people that come here'. Singling out immigrants was a bad call. Trying hard to defend it isn't great either.
/r/MensRights19/12/21 01:27 PM
-13

"You people that come here … whatever it is, you love our way of life, you love our milk and honey, at least you could pay a couple of bucks for a poppy,” Where did he say anything about people that don't pay their part?
/r/MensRights19/12/21 01:23 PM
-24

Calling someone baby in the workplace seems far more inappropriate than asking someone how big their middle finger is in a discussion about middle finger size...
/r/MensRights19/12/21 12:34 PM
8

Or 'man cave' could mean that the man owns that area and the rest of the house is shared. I have a 'man cave' type room set up and it has a lot of my sports paraphernalia decorating the walls. The rest of the house we have art and pictures that we both like for decorating. I don't think having my 'man cave' means the rest of the house is my wife's. The assumption that owning a man cave means your wife owns every other room is flawed. It's simply not the case in most partnerships. Sometimes, I th…
/r/MensRights19/12/21 11:43 AM
-21

They were discussing how long middle fingers can be advantageous in cricket and the reporter asked 'how big is yours' asking about his middle finger. And you want cancel culture to make sure she never works again? Why so vindictive about such an innocent question? Sometimes I think people in society today are just looking for things to be offended about.
/r/MensRights19/12/21 10:56 AM
0

Do you feel this woman proves something about all mothers? Do you feel bad stories about men proves something about all men? I don't think a single person's actions has any bearing on the entire gender.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 04:19 PM
0

And to sympathize, I need to accept misogyny and accept comments about how all women are bad? I disagree.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 03:55 PM
1

Because I'm not a feminist. Why would I go on a feminist subreddit?
/r/MensRights18/12/21 03:52 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter