| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| -4 | Men-only poker tournaments don't exist, because they're considered sexist. Meanwhile, women, who can play in both ladies tournaments and 'normal' mixed ones, are busy complaining that...Yes but the intimidation factor is more present for women and to some extent it's a problem of society. We're still teaching gender roles, if subconsciously or subtly. I'm not a fan of affirmative action in general (and this falls under this category in a VERY broad sense) but I'll admit that it is helpful in some instances as long as you're not teaching or reinforcing the already present inequality. That's all about how things like a women's only poker tournament is presented to women. If it's … | /r/MensRights | 26/10/10 04:24 AM |
| -2 | Men-only poker tournaments don't exist, because they're considered sexist. Meanwhile, women, who can play in both ladies tournaments and 'normal' mixed ones, are busy complaining that...But which is more damaging? An incubator of sorts or an environment that, at least at present, seems overtly hostile to female players especially at the competitive level? The article was a woman saying that women only tournaments were a good thing. Not that they created feelings of inadequacy. | /r/MensRights | 26/10/10 04:08 AM |
| 3 | Men-only poker tournaments don't exist, because they're considered sexist. Meanwhile, women, who can play in both ladies tournaments and 'normal' mixed ones, are busy complaining that...With anything like this you need to look at the environment and ask if the women's only tournaments have a useful and distinct purpose. Since poker is definitely a male dominated area and there's still a perception that it's a man's area of the world then yes they do have a purpose. They generate the perception that women can play too and at a competitive level and they also guarantee that there's an environment for women to cut their teeth on the game without having "you're a woman" added to th… | /r/MensRights | 25/10/10 03:43 PM |
| 1 | Does that about sum it all up...No but this is working on it: http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/SavageLove?show=blog | /r/MensRights | 06/10/10 06:06 AM |
| 1 | An X just told me to never visit her work while she's there, but it's Costco, and I love Costco. What are my rights regarding that?Suggestion: Talk to her manager sometime when she's not there and ask if you can work something out so you can avoid getting sued or in legal trouble. If there's a record, even a verbal one between you and her manager, that you didn't intend to stalk her and just wanted to shop in peace then you've got a leg up if she goes batshit on you. | /r/MensRights | 03/10/10 10:34 PM |
| 1 | Married last week... I was troll faced last night. Now what?In the words of Dan Savage: DTMFA. | /r/MensRights | 22/09/10 02:45 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter