TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

EqualityCompass Archive

View 4 posts and 40 comments by EqualityCompass on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
110

I believe all self-harm is included in the 'attempted suicide' statistics too, skewing it further.
/r/MensRights06/06/23 04:06 PM
41

What is really strange is that talk like that is just so normal. If you were to continue and break the stats down by race as well and infer conclusions from that data then these same people would be apoplectic. These are people that will talk about a 'male curfew' from a point of superiority, but then go crazy at the suggestion of a 'Muslim curfew' based upon exactly the same rationale. The strange thing is that the MRM has largely internalised the idea that you shouldn't judge people based upon…
/r/MensRights11/05/23 12:06 PM
1

Can you dm me your postcode so I can check? Thx!
/r/MensRights02/05/23 08:17 AM
3

If it works in the UK I do plan on rolling it out across other countries.
/r/MensRights30/04/23 06:19 PM
1

This doesn't really matter. At the moment either party could pick up a large amount of votes by doing virtually nothing, and nobody can truly oppose the basis of what we are asking for outside a few hardened demagogues. If they knew their party could pick up a few thousand votes by doing something that nobody would really object to, they would. Especially if it is somewhere that is a close race. Remember a lot of votes can be won or lost by a small margin in swing districts. Simply supporting an…
/r/MensRights30/04/23 05:26 PM
3

But that's all of them! 🤣 Indeed. But if there are several thousand votes on the table, and one of them knows they can pick them all up simply by saying something like 'We need to look in to the education gender gap', then they most certainly will. The primary reason they don't care about male issues is that it doesn't affect their election chances.
/r/MensRights30/04/23 02:20 PM
5

That's the plan!
/r/MensRights30/04/23 02:18 PM
2

A few points on the matter: Men getting paid more for the same job is largely a myth. The more you control for the smaller the gap gets. The gap is simply because men work more, they do longer hours at harder jobs. Men are told from birth that if you are poor, you are a loser. Is it possible that the constant messaging and social pressure forces men to work longer hours at more dangerous jobs? Men sacrifice work/life balance for that money. Women largely choose balance over the money - which is …
/r/MensRights23/03/23 11:28 AM
1

Yeah, it's a challenge. I've not written them yet because of this but I think it can be done. I'm considering paring it back to focus mainly on education as that's the easiest one to win. I'm going to give it some thought.
/r/MensRights01/03/23 04:34 PM
1

That's why it's important picking the issues. It's hard to argue that fixing the education gender gap is a bad thing without looking like a monster.
/r/MensRights01/03/23 04:09 PM
1

I used paternal surrender as an example of something that is talked about here that would probably get no public support. Although looking at your post history it looks like you've decided that the idea of fixing issues affecting men and boys is something to be actively opposed. It strikes me as sad that someone would spend their limited time making things worse for another demographic, rather than better.
/r/MensRights01/03/23 04:07 PM
4

Yeah, it's UK based so it will be focused on UK issues. I do plan on branching out if it's successful as it will require heavy customization for each political area.
/r/MensRights01/03/23 03:53 PM
1

Why? As I said nothing is set in stone and the large reason for this post is to have my ideas challenged. What would you do to move things forwards politically?
/r/MensRights01/03/23 03:52 PM
3

The positions are not terribly important tbh - and as I said not set in stone. My main concern is for everything to be politically palatable. Jumping straight in with Paternal Surrender would make the whole thing too toxic to touch, I'm hoping to keep it as 'Nobody can have a problem with this' as possible. The main idea is to mainstream the idea that men even have issues as currently they don't, at least politically.
/r/MensRights01/03/23 03:29 PM
5

See this is exactly the sort of feedback I want. Everything that's clear to me may not be clear to everyone else. The basic idea is to assess each candidate on a variety of issues (which are not set in stone) but are currently: Minister of Men, Education, Circumcision and Criminal Justice Reform. Each candidate would then be assigned a score based upon this. Before each election it would then be indicated which candidate has the highest score, and in terms of a tie it would go to the party with …
/r/MensRights01/03/23 03:10 PM
3

Opinions, mainly. Voices of support. If I finish building it, launch it, and absolutely nobody cares then the whole thing would have been a waste of time.
/r/MensRights01/03/23 02:46 PM
2

Remember there are only two possible answers that explain the education gender gap: Systemic discrimination. Boys are just dumber than girls. There is no 3.
/r/MensRights02/02/23 05:36 PM
5

I'm sure that menslib is great for people that agree with them, but like all other feminist subreddits if you disagree with what they say then out comes the banhammer. At that point it just becomes a sub pontification, which is of no use to anyone.
/r/MensRights23/01/23 09:42 AM
15

Interestingly look at children's TV over the last 10+ years. You will literally not find a science show (in the UK at least) with a male host.
/r/MensRights22/01/23 07:25 PM
12

In which case the name 'patriarchy' simply doesn't apply anymore. At that point it's just called 'society'.
/r/MensRights18/01/23 09:05 AM
20

I don't remember the whole story but he described Pearl Harbor as a response to Japan having their gas supply cut off The apologist streak is a strange one. Japan had their gas cut off because they were 'doing a Russia' to China, mass murdering and raping their way through the country. Most historians consider Japan as being worse than Germany in terms of brutality and war crimes, just lacking in the efficiency. Dresden, Hiroshima, Nagasaki and later on things like the Belgrano, and insisting on…
/r/MensRights17/06/22 07:01 AM
2

No. It's getting worse. The problem is echo-chambers, largely online, that are totally detached from any form of pushback or challenge to their ideas. It's basically like the Fox News Effect - large amounts have been so overexposed to every minor issue getting twisted and blown out of all proportion. If you compare things like the Sarah Everhard murder to Benghazi, it's one unfortunate event that doesn't really mean much that they believe is some massive issue simply because they spent months ta…
/r/MensRights16/06/22 01:38 PM
5

Can I just add that if you are who you say you are then you have virtually no life experience or sources of comparison. Large amounts of the people here have been talking about these issues _since before you were born_. Your solution is also basically 'tell them to man up'. You are literally erasing lived experiences, gaslighting, and actually causing a net-negative to society by minimising and victim blaming a very real problem. Given your attitude you are actually making the world a worse plac…
/r/MensRights15/06/22 09:52 AM
2

Well, rates of criminality, incuding violent crimes and rape, increase approximately 8x for boys from single-mother homes, while girls see no such increase. I'd say an assertion that school results are also probably affected too is likely.
/r/MensRights15/06/22 09:47 AM
7

People across the board have trouble learning things that they are not interested in. The school curriculum and reading lists have been designed by women - and I'll admit a lot is subconscious - based upon their interests. Even the teachers level of enthusiasm is a factor. Poetry? Lots of enthusiasm. Ancient Greece? Virtually none, and again most modules focus on 'women and children' rather than great events. The idea that men and women are interested in the same things is a lie without any evid…
/r/MensRights15/06/22 09:44 AM
9

The interesting thing is when boys face systemic discrimination they have to 'take responsibility', yet when girls face it 'something must be done'. For the last 50 years there has been an active push to help advance girls in education across the board, and no such push for men. Even subtle things such as a reading lists designed by women based upon their interests. I remember doing a module on WW2 and the subject was 'Women and the Home Front'. I did not find it interesting, and this was a cons…
/r/MensRights15/06/22 09:36 AM
13

The discrimination is low level and not that overt, but it is so widespread the effect is cumulatively massive. It is proven that women have an in-group bias, and that women teachers give male pupils fewer marks for the same quality work as boys. Also subjects that were previously male dominated are being forcibly made gender-neutral. For example you wont find a male presenter on a science/engineering show on childrens TV. Add in all the 'Girls Only' coding events and you get the situation where…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/06/22 03:26 PM
12

It's not actually true - there is no evidence for it. It is often trotted out as an explanation for the level of discrimination going on, however. Remember all the explanations given serve the purpose of distracting you from the real reason for the gaps - systemic discrimination.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/06/22 06:59 AM
65

There are only two possible explanations to this: Girls are just plain smarter than boys. Systemic discrimination. There is no option 3. It is that simple. If we are to accept 1 as truth then that opens the door to all sorts of arguments that the feminists simply do not want to have. The "Women just don't have technical brains" gets put on the table. Furthermore if it is 1, how come the problem is getting rapidly worse over the last 50 years? Are boys 'evolving' in to these idiots at sci-fi leve…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/06/22 06:56 AM
3

It's not so much a problem with Feminists. Well, it is, but that is more of an involved discussion. The problem is that Feminists largely have absolutely no problem with the insane #killallmen #maletears contingent who think it's a zero sum game, a contingent with enormous institutional power I might add. It's like asking why minorities have a problem with American Conservatives. It's not that they are explicitly racist, it's just that they largely don't have a problem sharing a political bed wi…
/r/MensRights01/06/22 12:19 AM
5

Actually STEM isn't male dominated. Biology and medicine are specifically excluded from the STEM grouping to achieve the male dominated result. If you were to put Biology, chemistry and medicine back in it would be woman dominated. Remember that a woman that develops a cure for Covid is not STEM, but learning to fix someones printer is.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 12:08 AM
5

While true that sort of argument is easily deflected and the person making the argument can be made to look like an idiot very easily. Also if you graph out the fact that boys are doing progressively worse year on year - are they getting stupider? Also the fact that women give boy pupils lesser scores for the same work as girl pupils is especially proplematic. Things like sexual assault equality, all that's required is someone to stand up and say 'This is what I was wearing when I was raped' and…
/r/MensRights31/05/22 04:50 PM
22

I cannot stress this enough: Focus on education equality. Too much time is spent talking about contentious issues that are tricky to get the public on board with. When you talk about education you are defending children. The traditional counter by feminists is 'well boys are just lazy', which is a horrible look. Remember there are only two options regarding education inequality: Women are just straight up smarter than men. or Systemic bias. There is no option three. And if anyone argues for 1, t…
/r/MensRights31/05/22 12:24 PM
9

Margaret Thatcher.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 04:29 PM
2

Keep fighting the good fight! I am UK based and will be launching in the UK initially, but I do plan on expanding to cover multiple countries at some point. I'll hit you up for help on the Education Issues sheet, if that's alright and I ever get to that point! Personally I think the will is there, but everyone is afraid of the feminist lobby and tanking there chances of winning anything. Maybe they just need a push?
/r/MensRights20/05/22 11:13 AM
1

You're probably right, but that is what I hope to change.
/r/MensRights19/05/22 12:25 PM
3

I'm not sure progress is actually really being made. In terms of political support the MRM still has absolutely nothing. In the UK the last big 'gender issue' that was talked about was men staring at women on public transport. So it's now illegal to look at a woman on a train. Meanwhile the government is not even talking about the education gender gap, circumcision and the violence men face. You'll notice all the mainstream media is doing their absolute best to show Amber Heard in as favourable …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/05/22 08:28 AM
3

Thanks!
/r/MensRights18/05/22 11:22 PM
5

We can turn the system against them. Create a large enough voting bloc and they will be forced to tackle the issues if not doing so means losing.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 11:11 PM
4

But nobody is politically angry. Nobody seems to mind too much and carries on arguing over Kang or Kodos while none of the options even acknowlege a single point of ours exists. I don't think I've seen a post on here about trying to hold politicans accountable pretty much ever.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 10:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter