TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Equivalent-Run7156 Archive

View 6 posts and 70 comments by Equivalent-Run7156 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
14

Equivalent-Run7156/r/ExRedPill16/05/21 12:09 PM
2

Removed: Specific Situation Equivalent-Run7156/r/seduction21/03/21 12:40 PM
1

ConversationEquivalent-Run7156/r/seduction12/07/22 09:05 AM
1

Equivalent-Run7156/r/TheRedPill16/05/21 12:10 PM
1

Equivalent-Run7156/r/TheRedPill27/03/21 09:31 PM
1

Removed: Assumptions Based on Physical Appearance/LimitationsEquivalent-Run7156/r/seduction16/05/21 12:13 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-4

You absolutely have the right to be anxious, after all 70% of divorces are initiated by women and that jumps to 90% when they’re college educated. Don’t forget that in the overwhelming majority of divorces the the man is required to give his wealth away to the women who abandoned him. So is it really surprising that 90% of divorces are initiated by college educated women? It’s literally a conflict of interest, the women gets monetary gain from divorcing. Generally speaking women desire a man abo…
/r/ExRedPill20/04/23 09:45 PM
1

What a lame way to admit you lost a debate
/r/ExRedPill15/04/23 04:42 AM
1

So do you disagree with the 2019 Swedish study that shows, women on average marry men who have a higher income than themselves. If you do disagree with the outcome of that study, is your disagreement substantive? Or does it lay in your emotional and empathetic prowess
/r/ExRedPill14/04/23 10:15 PM
2

I’m confused, you didn’t refute any of my arguments. Am I alt right or am I just normal? Now if you could, please refute at least something I said.
/r/ExRedPill14/04/23 10:11 PM
2

“Whither hypergamy” (Institute for Family Studies, Jan. 29, 2020): “Hypergamy turns out to be a stubborn thing. It seems that the highly credentialed alpha female still prefers a mate above her pay grade. In one of the most widely cited papers on the subject, demographer Yue Qian compared couples in the 1980 Census and in 2012 American Community Survey. She found that during the intervening decades, though wives became more likely to marry down in terms of educational achievement, ‘the tendency …
/r/ExRedPill14/04/23 09:50 PM
1

It’s only recently where women have been able to get college degrees and high paying jobs, and of course women would rather have a higher status job and higher paying job that’s completely understandable. Women consistently outperform men in school on average. Men have been partnering with higher paid women, simply because the amount of higher paid women is steadily increasing, and earning amount is such a small factor(if not negligible)for men when considering a partner. For example, if women s…
/r/ExRedPill13/04/23 08:09 PM
2

Women want to get the most resourceful man to increase chances of success for the offspring(understandably) most men wouldn’t give a shit if his girlfriend worked at McDonald’s however for women it’s a huge turn off. This is obvious
/r/ExRedPill13/04/23 07:06 AM
0

Women are instinctively much more hypergamous than men due to basic evolutionary reasons. Every piece of evidence points us that way. Most men wouldn’t give a shit if his girlfriend worked at McDonald’s however for women it’s a huge turn off. We see countless examples time and time again, to simply ignore that women tend to be more hypergamous is bizarre.( it’s also not a bad thing, it just mean she has higher standards and wants the best thing she can get)
/r/ExRedPill13/04/23 07:02 AM
2

Women tend to date up in terms of social hierarchy, whilst men tend to date across or below, this is natural. Women instinctually desire resourceful, competent, intelligent men. The more resourceful and intelligent the man is, the better chances of success the offspring will have. It’s completely understandable. A women needs to ensure she gets the absolute best man possible in her reach, because the consequences of birthing kids fathered by a poor, weak and unintelligent man can be devastating.…
/r/ExRedPill13/04/23 06:59 AM
2

Absolutely true
/r/ExRedPill13/04/23 06:51 AM
1

I would also argue that before all of these factors ( ambition money, socialibility etc) are taken into account you are also screened by women about how attractive you are, you’ll need to be a certain level of attractiveness according to her standards in order to get your foot in the door. For example being tall enough and handsome enough with a good enough body. Women’s standards differ but usually you’ll need a prerequisite of looks
/r/ExRedPill22/02/23 07:41 PM
1

Exactly, because being a musician albeit a broke one displays high levels of skill and ambition. There’s something deeply attractive about a broke man starting up a business, sleeping on the couch if he’s restlessly working on something that will provide value in the future
/r/ExRedPill22/02/23 07:38 PM
0

From some quick google searches I can see this dude is a criminal, many women tend to be turned on my criminality. Being an intelligent criminal is a great display of masculinity albeit not ethical, it displays masculine traits, fearlessness, aggression, cunning, disagreeableness etc. for the past millions of years women have always been drawn to the man who doesn’t mind getting into a fight or will not get pushed over easily. Because aggressive men often got what they wanted, whilst pushover me…
/r/ExRedPill22/02/23 07:32 PM
1

Generally speaking the red pill is true, women look for resourceful, competent men with a strong sense of ambition. In any statistical analysis there will always a be outliers outside of the general linear curve. For the average men, the way they can increase their value and thereby get more women is by making a lot of money and becoming physically competent. If a dude tried to become super empathetic and caring, emotional, he would get much less women. Simply facts.
/r/ExRedPill22/02/23 07:27 PM
1

As the saying goes, “Exceptions don’t make rules”
/r/ExRedPill22/02/23 07:10 PM
1

No I’m not even intelligent, you don’t need to refer to me as anything. it’s just common sense and basic math/statistics. You probably just have a low iq which is why you are the top 1% in penis size yet struggle to please your partner, riddled with insecurities. Or an easier explanation is you’re delusional with a sub 5. Cheers
/r/ExRedPill07/02/23 09:12 PM
1

Jokes aside, you see how you’re clearly delusional though right. Like if you genuinely had a 7.5 inch penis you wouldn’t even be able to fit it all the way inside her, it would take a lot of warming up for her, and she would’ve never came across a penis like that before you or after you for that matter. She would also be shocked at the size the first time she sees it. Case closed
/r/ExRedPill07/02/23 09:08 PM
1

So what’s your real size?
/r/ExRedPill07/02/23 09:04 PM
1

Either she has the loosest widest pussy known to man, or you’re simply delusional. Those are the two outcomes
/r/ExRedPill07/02/23 09:02 PM
1

They don’t need to be released, nothing happens if they don’t get released, it just gets recycled within the body
/r/ExRedPill07/02/23 08:58 PM
1

You obviously aren’t 7.5 inches if you are insecure, youre probably sub 5 or got a very skinny penis. For the average women you can’t even fit 7.5 inches all the way inside, it literally takes 5-10 minutes to work your way in her so most likely you’re extremely delusional. Only 1 percent of men have a penis between 7-8 inches so the chances your partner has had or will ever have this penis size, is extremely low. The mass majority of women would never even come across a penis that’s 7.5 inches. …
/r/ExRedPill07/02/23 08:47 PM
1

For sure and I guess my point is that many people are genetically doomed , they never even get a chance to put their foot in the door. So the first step for them is to fix their appearance
/r/ExRedPill06/02/23 09:06 PM
1

Resentment, being lonely for a long time without knowing why, many men that end up doing atrocious acts tend to be ugly, depressed lonely men It’s just obvious what do you think would happen if you consistently told an ugly 25 year old short virgin man that he’s attractive and handsome yet gets no female attention or reciprocation, there will come a point of resentment after so many rejections
/r/ExRedPill06/02/23 08:52 PM
0

Absolutely so I guess the universal truth is that looks matter massively, but unfortunately short men have it worse since women carry so much importance on height, men don’t care as much about height
/r/ExRedPill06/02/23 08:50 PM
1

It’s dangerous for ugly men to be delusional, thinking they deserve a beautiful looking women, it’s genuinely dangerous. Someone needs to tell them they are ugly and need to do something about it
/r/ExRedPill06/02/23 08:21 PM
1

You wouldn’t date a 5’3 overweight man with a recessed chin, round cheeks, thinning hair, negative canthal tilt, 3/10 in looks. All I’m saying is for pretty much every single women you need to reach a minimum attractiveness requirement, from there you can get your foot in the door and the rest will be up to your personality, your smell, ambition etc
/r/ExRedPill06/02/23 08:20 PM
1

This would be the most logical approach for a 27 year old virgin that’s short and ugly, that no women wants to date him. Living in delusion is not a good long term strategy
/r/ExRedPill06/02/23 08:10 PM
0

Could you rebuttal any of what I said? Attractiveness matters, ALOT.
/r/ExRedPill06/02/23 08:08 PM
-1

To be attractive firstly, the only way to get your foot in the door is if she’s attracted to you, unfortunately for many men they are genetically doomed. If you’re short it’s a deal breaker to most women and even if it’s not, you would need to compensate extreme amounts to become anywhere near a 6 foot plus dude. If you’re lacking in the face department, to the point where you’re a sub 5 in attractiveness, the uncomfortable truth that no one will tell you is you need to get surgeries done to hav…
/r/ExRedPill06/02/23 07:42 PM
1

I would still consider myself somewhat black and red pilled. But I do see some flaws in both ideologies
/r/ExRedPill25/03/22 08:59 AM
1

this is what the black pill ideology means, pretty privilege triumphs.if you are undesirable to a greater number of people, it explains you getting bullied for your looks and OP experiencing the unfortunate string of events. Many men are in OP's shoes and what do you expect them to do, we are biologically wired for attraction. when men(or women) cant meet the basic biological requirement of being human, of course he will feel disabled, of course he will feel like a loser, this is the biological …
/r/ExRedPill30/11/21 06:45 AM
2

People forget there HAS to be winners and losers, a reality where everyone is on an even playing field simply doesn’t and will never exist, and it will never be different in the dating market. Generally speaking the black pill holds truth, linearly, most straight women desire a taller man, with objectively attractive looks(prominent jawline, positive/neutral canthal tilt, high cheekbones, etc). Now, this doesn’t mean every single women desires these features, of course there will be the low chan…
/r/ExRedPill28/11/21 09:24 AM
1

Thanks, I hope your growing of the beautiful plant goes well. You have some beautiful plants my friend!
/r/ExRedPill21/11/21 11:32 AM
1

Maybe many men would date a pornstar, but not so many would marry or want to have a kid with them. Or maybe I’m completely wrong, maybe porn stars are the most desireable type of women to marry, it would be an interesting study
/r/ExRedPill21/11/21 11:29 AM
1

But the majority of men also share this feeling regardless if they consider themselves red pilled or not, that’s why the extreme vast incredibly large amount of men wouldn’t date a porn star
/r/ExRedPill21/11/21 11:21 AM
1

It is a cult of ideology and very extremist views, I don’t dislike women for sleeping around, however i wouldn’t want to be with a women that has slept around before and I don’t know why. It’s just a sickly feeling at the back my head if I found out my wife slept with many women.
/r/ExRedPill21/11/21 11:15 AM
2

Just because it was a theory that was made in 1979 doesn’t make it wrong, maybe it’s because that theory is still seen as valid and plausible
/r/ExRedPill21/11/21 11:12 AM
1

Sustenance? Or substance, that’s the word I’m looking for
/r/ExRedPill21/11/21 11:11 AM
1

Hey I’m only 19 ✌️ maybe when I’m older and wise like you my theory with have sustenance. It has some evolving to do for sure. But I wouldn’t consider myself red pilled
/r/ExRedPill21/11/21 11:11 AM
0

You didnt read the wiki page? Not sure which wiki page you were reading man, same wiki page i sent you btw "This hypothesis suggests that women concealed ovulation to obtain men's aid in rearing offspring. Schoroder[14] summarizes this hypothesis outlined in Alexander and Noonan's 1979 paper: if women no longer signaled the time of ovulation, men would be unable to detect the exact period in which they were fecund. This led to a change in men's mating strategy: rather than mating with multiple w…
/r/ExRedPill21/11/21 11:08 AM
1

Thats why humans devloped feelings of trust, love, connection and jealousy
/r/ExRedPill21/11/21 11:07 AM
1

I dont need to be around it to know its a great minority compared with couple marriages. if you dont believe couple marriages are the majority im going to withdraw from this discussion now...
/r/ExRedPill21/11/21 11:05 AM
0

Thats cool man, and neither have you. See someone elses words without explanation mean alot. at least explain how im wrong instead of half assed comments. at least im tryin!
/r/ExRedPill21/11/21 11:03 AM
1

you straw-manned me, i never said stalker i said if men don't see their women fornicating with another man they will believe the child is theirs how does that mean stalker
/r/ExRedPill21/11/21 11:02 AM
0

Dude, you are bringing up extreme minority, of course there will be abnormalities of any sociological idea or even any population there is always the minority, we go off the general linear averages that gives us the clearest indication. absolutely by in large couple marriages are the most common by a long shot. homosexuality isnt viable for evolution, why does it exist? abnormalities of the general linear direction!
/r/ExRedPill21/11/21 11:01 AM
0

Im not red pilled by the way, paternal investment theory aligns perfectly with my synergy theory and whole theory tbh, its part of the reason i started connecting these dots
/r/ExRedPill21/11/21 10:58 AM
1

There is one theory, ive seen it somewhere i can research it if you want the reference. Apparently in early stages of human life the child more often looks more similar to the father to create a connection and a motivation to look after the baby and for the father to be certain its his. Other than this is doesnt really matter that the father has no concrete evidence its his, as long as he hasnt seen his women sleep with another man he is convinced its his child, which explains the resentment men…
/r/ExRedPill21/11/21 10:56 AM
1

Well to me, the great majority is Men and women work together to survive, idea of marriage backs this up which is common among almost every country and culture
/r/ExRedPill21/11/21 10:52 AM
1

"Paternal investment hypothesis" ​ there is a massive section on the whole theory i said, read that if youre interested
/r/ExRedPill21/11/21 10:50 AM
1

"another possibility (regarding humans specifically) is that while highly specific signaling of ovulation is absent, human female anatomy evolved to mimic permanent signaling of fertility.[16" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concealed\_ovulation
/r/ExRedPill21/11/21 10:49 AM
1

Of course there are outliers, dont act silly. Linearly though what I said would be the case in general
/r/ExRedPill21/11/21 10:47 AM
1

Evolved to synergise, meaning men and women often worked together to produce a more effective and efficient environment to bring up the offspring. Aka( hunters & gatherers) A lot of times in the animal kingdom the male would leave the female and she would be left alone to survive with the offspring which reduces chances of survival.
/r/ExRedPill21/11/21 10:43 AM
-4

Firstly, women that sleep around are looked down upon by alot of men, regardless if they associate with red pill communities, this is apparent without needing science. Secondly, the average man would rather a virgin partner than a partner that has slept around. The basis of my argument sits on these 2 assumptions, if you disagree(which I would be surprised) then fair enough, we simply disagree. If you agree though, If these two points remain true, the assumption that men have a desire to spread …
/r/ExRedPill21/11/21 10:40 AM
1

The reason expression of ovulation doesn’t exist in humans is because of safety, men and women evolved to synergise. If women had an expression of ovulation the men would most likely leave them until ovulation period started, making survival harder. When there is no expression of ovulation, men simply can’t tell when she is ovulating therefore to the man, she is always sexually available and fertile, because he doesn’t know better. This is a well known theory.
/r/ExRedPill21/11/21 10:35 AM
-1

By the way when I say push the human race further I mean in solely for the mission on spreading one’s genes on and increasing population levels
/r/ExRedPill21/11/21 10:12 AM
-1

I didn’t provide science that’s correct, I have no idea if this is proven and it’s all just my theory, and you have every right to believe in wrong, and I’m double vaccinated :D. To me this is the most logical explanation as to why a lot of men have these ideas and it makes sense to me as to how it would help push the human race further. What’s also interesting that I’ve connected is in the animal kingdom particularly the big cats and apes dislike other males fornicating with the females and sho…
/r/ExRedPill21/11/21 10:11 AM
1

Care to expand?
/r/ExRedPill21/11/21 10:06 AM
-2

Care to expand, I’m all for admitting I’m wrong!
/r/ExRedPill21/11/21 10:05 AM
1

I’m not saying it’s rational, it’s irrational actually. But this idea is natures delight, warranted for evolutionary reasons which men didn’t have a say in, they just find themselves with this subconscious dislike for women that sleep around, it explains why they think this way. Why do men think it’s ok for them to sleep around: It is because of mens deep rooted desire for genetic diversity and producing their own offspring, they want to spread their seed as much as possible and don’t believe it…
/r/ExRedPill21/11/21 09:29 AM
0

Sure we could say more red pillers than blue pillers dislike women who sleep around, and the smv lowering actually is true for many men regardless if they associate themselves with red pill. If you asked an average man if he’d rather marry a virgin or a women who’s had sex with hundreds of men, I would argue over 90% would take the virgin. Knowing this we can draw the conclusion that the red pill SMV lowering idea isn’t exclusive to the red pill ideology, many men think this way subconsciously. …
/r/ExRedPill21/11/21 09:21 AM
2

Dumping him will only fuel his red pilled extremist views, but then again that isn’t her problem
/r/ExRedPill21/11/21 09:11 AM
1

Rejection is made up by 2 main factors, looks and personality. These can be categorised into smaller subcategories to get a more in depth understanding like height, facial aesthetic, ambition, neediness, agreeableness, humour etc. This is ultimately what it comes down to, and unfortunately no one has a choice in what personality they acquired and how they look, of course you can change your personality to a degree but you can’t change your neurology, some are neurologically different which affec…
/r/ExRedPill21/11/21 09:09 AM
-11

Women who enjoy sex are looked down upon by blue,black,red and purple pilled individuals you aren’t relating anything relevant to this red pill discussion by saying that. Men inherently dislike women that sleep around due to biological and evolutionary reasons, also fuelled by sociology.
/r/ExRedPill21/11/21 08:55 AM
1

That’s a great stretch and a stupid conclusion, with a gigantic generalisation, red pill has some extremist beliefs but not even close to a belief in rape, some men that you consider blue pilled rape women, and some men that are black pilled never rape and are respectful to women, it’s just the belief structure that is different. A man with normal functioning emotions and morals that is red pilled and can’t get laid would either go MGTOW or pay for sex, a red pilled belief structure doesn’t caus…
/r/ExRedPill21/11/21 08:52 AM
1

True
/r/seduction21/03/21 07:49 PM
1

True, I appreciate that
/r/seduction21/03/21 07:49 PM
1

Im 19 and she’s 20 actually lol. But thanks for the reality check, I’m taking this all too seriously you’re right. I’m meeting up with her tomorrow night and I’ll let you know how it goes
/r/seduction21/03/21 07:48 PM
2

Thanks! I’m meeting up with her tomorrow night I’ll let you know how it goes
/r/seduction21/03/21 07:47 PM
1

No not a fake account, just pics of me in peak conditions with the perfect angles and lighting
/r/seduction21/03/21 07:46 PM
1

Lol! I’m meeting up with her tomorrow night I’ll let you guys know how it goes, thanks for the advice
/r/seduction21/03/21 07:45 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter