TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Erdenaxela1997 Archive

View 4 posts and 175 comments by Erdenaxela1997 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

I don't see how this could be a misunderstanding. If someone makes derogatory comments about a man who plays video games, they are wrong. If she meant "a man who plays video games all his free time," then that's what she should have said. It would be a "misexplained" statement, not a "misunderstanding."
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 12:03 AM
–

That's not disagreeing.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 11:55 PM
–

There's nothing hidden in the subtext, that's the point. If you invent what you want to refute, then you're not really debating; you just want to be right about something you know is wrong, but you're immature enough not to realize it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 11:23 PM
–

Sometimes a guy can be an idiot, and then they become compatible. I don't know if two idiots are compatible.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 11:18 PM
–

I agree. And men should be more selective and avoid those women. I know being alone sucks and sometimes a woman who isn't worth it is the only option, however a woman who isn't worth it is worse than being alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 11:16 PM
–

I find it strange that alcohol and drugs aren't as detrimental as video games.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 11:15 PM
–

They would be smart to avoid those men, but we're not talking about them in this case.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 11:14 PM
–

Me neither, and I don't think anyone here is arguing that hobbies should be based on consumption. I think a lot of people are commenting on situations unrelated to the post, just like you did.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 11:13 PM
–

Who are you debating against? And what are you disagreeing with? You're going against something that nobody here is arguing in favor of.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 11:12 PM
–

I tend to trust what people say and not assume what they "mean." Except when they do Motte and Bailey, but that becomes clear from the connotation. Anyway, I'm not a mind reader; if the person thinks the problem is addiction, then they should say the problem is addiction.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 11:09 PM
–

I don't know. You're wasting your time making a comment that has nothing to do with the subject anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 10:05 PM
–

In your first comment, you summed it up as "not liking video games." I don't want to have to keep insisting that you read what you want to disagree with.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 09:23 PM
–

I'm happy about your relationship and I agree with everything you said regarding opinions. Including about men talking about nails and such. My wife likes to spend hours chatting with friends at the hair salon; I don't participate, obviously, but I don't think that's immature on her part at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 09:21 PM
–

The answer is vague. And that's the most precise answer I can give you.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 09:19 PM
–

The title represents the content of the post. But it shouldn't contain all the details, otherwise it wouldn't be a title, it wouldn't be an abstraction, it would be the post itself replicated twice. The post DEVELOPS the title. But you weren't able to read the third word of the title and you've already formed an opinion, so what's the point of joining the conversation? I don't even see the point in responding to you, so I'll stop here.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 09:13 PM
0

Convince me of what exactly? That connotation is irrelevant? That attractiveness should matter? I didn't quite understand your question.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 09:08 PM
–

I don't think most women fit what I described. I'm talking about a specific subset.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 09:06 PM
–

And you simply ignored the "hate" part. Choosing to read only what suits you. "Hate" is literally the third word. Besides, the title isn't everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 09:05 PM
–

You really need a straw man to feel like you're right. You're giving a rehearsed speech, which would be correct if delivered elsewhere, but is absurdly wrong here.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 09:03 PM
–

Because of their busy schedules, not much. Sometimes they're too tired for that too. It's just that at the end of the year, they can find some extra time.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:59 PM
–

My point is more about the hate itself. And about what to prioritize. Not every priority is intelligent.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:58 PM
–

I wouldn't judge a woman for rejecting someone hardcore in any hobby. The problem is more about using that as a shortcut to "maturity".
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:56 PM
–

There are some characteristics that are prioritized. Genetics and resources are the main ones, and everything else (morality, personality, hobbies) comes after. I think this conversation makes more sense when it comes to average men because: Ugly and poor men don't stand a chance anyway; they can have all the positive characteristics a woman listed, and she'll still reject them; Men with attractive genetics and a good wallet don't need to follow the rules; they can play video games and still att…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:52 PM
–

I think this might be more of a US thing than a religious issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:46 PM
–

:(
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:45 PM
–

Lucid. I think you're right about everything you said. But that also applies to people who scroll or post a lot on social media I have a problem with that. Especially watching funny, short YouTube videos and reading other people's discussions on Reddit. I have to actively refuse to watch them. That's my biggest drawback in that regard.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:44 PM
–

I think that in the US, because games are cheap, this might be more true than in other countries with weaker currencies.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:41 PM
–

Videogame are isolating. They're actually worse than gambling because at least gambling contributes to the local economy and usually have to donate a portion to important causes. That's simply false. Video games bring people together. Getting together to play video games is no different than getting together to go to the movies. Your hatred is based on a straw man argument. The only way you'll admit that is by debunking it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:40 PM
–

This isn't really true. You should really have one athletic thing and one creative thing in your life besides your consumer habits. I have. In this case, the problem would be the lack of some hobbies, not the presence of others. There was a lack of nuance in the reading. A person can go to the gym and play video games. They can also read books and ride a bicycle.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:37 PM
–

It could be. In that case, it would be more of a semantic issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:33 PM
–

My ex was a gamer, I had no issue until it took over his life, refused to come to the hospital when our 4 month old was in the neonatal because there was a dragon raid on. By then it seemed more like an addiction This is very bad and it's very sad to read this. If I was single again I would date a gamer as long as it wasn’t to that level. In the same way I would date someone who drank as long as it didn’t take over their life A wise policy. Sometimes it's difficult to differentiate between a cas…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:32 PM
–

You don't necessarily disagree, you just don't know how to read. What I pointed out went far beyond "not liking something." You think you disagree with what's written simply because you misunderstood and adopted a milder version of what I'm pointing out.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:30 PM
–

The four of us who play are Protestants.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:28 PM
–

I don't know why you somehow classify that as "masculinity." I know some women fit what you described, but why would that be "masculinity"?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:28 PM
–

It's kind of sad to dislike something because of the connotation it carries. It would be less bad to enjoy it in secret. And video games are also good tools for socialization; in fact, I really like local co-op for that reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:26 PM
–

The key is moderation, for any hobby. And I wasn't talking about "a woman having the right to reject someone because of a hobby"; everyone can make whatever choices they want in life. The issue is that some choices are simply not intelligent. Before a hobby, there's a whole host of priorities to consider.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:24 PM
–

A Victory Royale is more important than an orgasm. And isn't it the same thing? Just kidding, hahaha. But honestly, I'd say any addiction is bad. When I was single, I had already decided I wouldn't date an alcoholic woman, but I never called women who drink socially "immature."
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:22 PM
–

That's without even mentioning a number of games filled with sexual scenes. There are many games that, when I have children, will be banned from my house while they are young.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:20 PM
–

That summed it up well.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:19 PM
4

For someone who is no longer a child, you should know how to read.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:19 PM
–

What I said goes beyond simply "not liking" it. Any hobby that hinders your life and the lives of others is a problem; I don't think video games are in a special category, either positively or negatively. My problem is when it becomes a shortcut to declaring oneself mature, and also an attempt to pass moral judgment on others. For example, pointing out that liking a hobby you don't enjoy makes you immature.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:15 PM
–

What I said goes beyond simply "not liking" it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:12 PM
–

The thing is, there's a difference between liking something and using it as the defining characteristic of your personality. My wife, my friends, and I enjoy playing games, but before the game we have countless other priorities, like work, studies, family, laundry (this reminded me that I forgot the white clothes on the clothesline, I'll go collect them). I would also have issues with a woman who spent all day on any hobby and pressured me to participate with her many times. But casually I would…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:11 PM
–

My wife and my friend's wife are definitely beautiful women who could have a choice. In fact, I know many of the options they both had. Some simply enjoy playing games, others simply enjoy the indirect results of it. Women like to socialize, and video games are a great excuse for that. I, personally, prefer local multiplayer games for this reason, which is why I chose the Switch instead of Playstation or Xbox.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:06 PM
–

This seems like a very interesting and curious way to start a relationship. Good luck to you both.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:04 PM
–

I've heard something about it, but I haven't looked into it in depth.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:01 PM
–

In practice, women hate a man who is submissive to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:00 PM
–

This can also be said about modern music, modern videos, and even modern food.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 07:59 PM
–

And if that makes me boring, I'll live. Honestly. That's not really a bad thing if you know how to handle it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 07:55 PM
–

She can't admit it directly. That's why she uses the connotation of "gambling addiction" to detract from it. Addiction to anything is bad, so labeling something she dislikes as an addiction makes it a valid target in her mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 07:53 PM
–

I struggled with addiction to that game for a while. It didn't last long, and I was single. Gaming addiction is something that destroys relationships (that's why I stay away from LoL these days). However, you and she playing in a healthy way is something that benefits the relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 07:51 PM
–

Tabletop RPGs aren't something I enjoy. But if my wife liked them, I'd play with her, maybe I'd even start to like them. My problem with it is that the players' schedules never match up, and it ends up being stressful to organize, feeling more like "work" than "playing." But if it was just to show up and play, I'd definitely go.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 07:50 PM
2

It's not something I'd want to try. In fact, I'd rather I never had to try. I work with automation (it's actually just part of my job, so I'm not that deep into it) and I know that many things are automated in aviation. Maybe I could do it, maybe not. With current technology it should be technically easy, but it would also be difficult to keep a cool head in a real situation, which would hurt the chances.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 07:47 PM
-1

Yes, but he was ranked 462nd in the men's category, and now he takes female hormones.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 07:31 PM
-1

For me, it will depend a lot on the connotation and the context. The attractiveness of the stranger will not weigh on how strange it is. That's the difference I'm highlighting; for many women, attractiveness would matter, not be the absolute factor, but it would positively influence their decision the greater it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 07:01 PM
-1

Just look at what happens when mediocre men put on a wig, take female hormones, and compete against women in sports. Will Thomas was ranked 462nd in men's swimming, and became number 1 in "women's" swimming, even after nerfing himself with hormones. If a healthy man doesn't become top tier in any sport against women, he simply hasn't trained enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 06:59 PM
2

I'm not going to fund what YOU'RE trying to test. Do it yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 06:53 PM
2

I'm not bragging about anything. It's just a fact, any healthy man, with a few years of training, would beat her. I'm not bragging, it's just a biological reality. I'm just a healthy man, nothing more than that. And who here is saying I can land a plane without training? Your analogy is wrong. With training I could land a plane, do you want to sponsor me while I train that too?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 06:30 PM
6

And you're going to sponsor me for two years so I can train? Are you going to organize the competition as well? Or is your challenge just meaningless rhetoric? I know the answer, I'm just being rhetorical.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 06:26 PM
3

You need a man. If men stopped today, you would lose a lot of essential services. You just don't care about them, that's all. And any healthy man, including ME, would beat professional female athletes with enough preparation, which can be done in just 1 or 2 years of training. My not beating her TODAY in something for which she has prepared for her entire life is no demerit for me, she also wouldn't beat me in what I do and in many other things regardless of the time you gave her, and you wouldn…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 06:12 PM
11

It depends on the context. In some contexts it's important to mention, in others not. And as more and more men are competing in women's sports categories, it becomes increasingly necessary to mention the physical differences between men and women. This is something the "Save Women's Sports" movement does a lot, and they are right. It's also important to counter feminist nonsense that women are better than men at everything, that women don't need men, and a lot of other false rubbish where men us…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 05:44 PM
0

Just as you agree that 2+2=4. But as we've seen, this is very difficult for some people.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 04:07 PM
4

2 + 2 = 4 ... I disagree
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 04:06 PM
1

I think this works, but only if done the right way, not the way women want it done. If you're an average-looking guy, understanding women (based on what they do, not what they say) will help you a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 03:52 PM
0

It's a shame that's not true. Not often is it "maybe," "insist more," "wait in line," "another day." I always interpreted "no" as "no," and for that very reason, sometimes I was considered a guy who "gives up at the first obstacle" or "at the first no" and therefore "undeserving." Of course, it was better that way for me, and maybe that's why I'm with a better woman now, but at the time I was young and stupid. But even today, if I were single, I would still interpret "no" as "no," but this time …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 03:49 PM
-7

Well... You know where a lot of people live. And the difference between: How creepy! He knows where I live! and: How interesting! He even knows where I live! Is how attractive the guy is.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 03:44 PM
6

Married Red Pill A lot of people are Red Pill, but don't like the label.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 02:45 PM
3

Being a man is biological; you could never learn to be one.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 02:42 PM
1

Strangely, this made a lot of sense to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 09:47 AM
6

I didn't write anything in Spanish, and Reddit has automatic translation anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 04:05 AM
10

If the analogies were exactly the same, it wouldn't be an analogy, but an identical situation. We compare the variables that matter. You simply don't know what an analogy is.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 03:56 AM
6

In all cases, the guy being muscular will make him look better than the non-muscular version. This may be insufficient if the guy is really really ugly, but muscles can take some guys out of incel status and give them a girlfriend. Even a guy with a slightly ugly face and average height can acquire a "wild" beauty, which can be attractive to some women. Muscles also save many bald people
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 10:27 PM
4

Well... many things are not impossible. Just look at natural bodybuilders. Of course, many will have to quit their job as an accountant and find a way to earn money without working to achieve some shape, but it's still not impossible.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 10:24 PM
7

If the chocolate/pizza analogy didn't clear things up for her, then I don't know how else to explain it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 10:21 PM
15

This is sad. It should work as a "no" for women, but it has the opposite effect. That's why there is no man who "doesn't cheat due to lack of options", because if the man is married, then he will have other options, therefore a faithful man is faithful because he wants to.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 10:17 PM
1

I understand. But let's not get into the definition of "lying", especially when there is a language barrier. And it seems that you agree regarding the effects, regardless of any moral judgment that the word "lying" could carry.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 10:01 PM
1

Eu não quero nada. Você poderia simplesmente ficar quietinho. Se não se interessa, é só ignorar ao invés de fazer um chilique sobre isso. Além disso, usar a tradução automática não seria você traduzindo algo para mim, mas sim o Reddit traduzindo algo para você. Você nem sabe sobre o quê está falando.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 09:58 PM
1

You are sure
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 09:14 PM
19

In my experience it worked. I've been skinny, I've been fat and I've been strong. The only thing that increased my attractiveness more than muscles was my wedding ring.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 09:13 PM
15

And why should something irrelevant support what I said? This is about what women like, not what they don't like. If I said that women like chocolate, would you post pictures of pizza that women like as if that somehow upset me?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 09:12 PM
8

You're just adding irrelevant criteria, it's not a "selection". I also didn't say anything about 9/11 here, that doesn't make me selective.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 09:07 PM
1

Eu errei na hora de de Colar. É muita putaria para dar uma informação, era só ter avisado, não precisava ser um imbecil. Também bastaria clicar em "traduzir". E sim, agora estou fazendo de propósito, mas só com você, por ser um idiota.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 09:06 PM
0

In fact, it is correct to do as I did, isolate the variables. A man with money provides "security", but we are not talking about money here, so "money" is a variable that must be isolated. Just like "facial beauty" or anything else. The variable under discussion here is muscles.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 09:03 PM
3

The truth is the truth. The lie is the lie. It does not depend on consciousness or intention. If what is said reflects reality, then it is true, otherwise it is a lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 09:00 PM
10

Does liking "A" make you dislike "B"? Mentioning this would be irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 08:59 PM
8

Yes, I addressed this type of guy in my post. Are you able to understand what you read?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 08:58 PM
1

hahahahahah. It seems like the most extreme example of what I'm saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 08:54 PM
-1

O post original está em Inglês. Todo o conteúdo está em Inglês. Você está reclamando apenas por ser um cara chato. Por isso o "bad faith arguer" no seu rótulo
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 08:52 PM
20

A body like this guy's, at his height, is very difficult to maintain naturally. He needs A LOT OF DEDICATION
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 08:51 PM
-2

Because that rule would be idiotic. As stupid as a rule to ban English from a sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 08:47 PM
18

Many who are given as examples of "Pretty boys with some muscles" are guys who live off their bodies and take steroids, like the guys listed in the post for example.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 08:45 PM
0

Didn't you read the third paragraph? And this is not an individual analysis, but a general trend.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 08:44 PM
–

Você está defecando pelos dedos.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 01:40 AM
4

What is de "D" and the "L"? Why not "CG"?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 12:53 AM
8

What fuck is this? DL??
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 12:48 AM
0

A subclass of murder does not negate the nature of murder. What differentiates it from today is the lack of technology. Whether the place of death is the womb or a volcano, it doesn't change anything. A fetus is not a child, just as a teenager is not an adult.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 09:02 PM
-3

This issue of abortion will always be a problem; for hundreds of years we threw unwanted children into volcanoes. There are tribes that have been burying children alive for hundreds of years. Killing a child has always been a thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 03:44 PM
2

Não são os arquétipos que importam, mas as variáveis. Você correlacionou variáveis equivocadamente e chamou de arquétipos, mas esqueceu que a mulher não ser promíscua não necessariamente indica falta de libido, pois pode indicar também grande auto controle.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 02:52 PM
1

That's still much more specific than "in this subreddit". You're talking as if you're referring to a huge sample.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 02:39 PM
2

These guys only take the risk because they have no other option. They don't feel any "good vibes." It's like being starving and eating something that risks being poisoned; you didn't feel a "healthy food vibe," you just felt you needed to eat.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 02:13 PM
0

Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot, Fidel, Lenin, Kim, etc., etc., etc. Including Hitler on the list doesn't proportionally add that much to the number of deaths, since he's not even the worst on the list; there are many worse than him. Those I mentioned easily add up to 100 million victims, even without Hitler.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 09:38 PM
-1

Are you so wrong and such a terrible debater that you need your opponents to be flat-earthers and anti-vaxxers to win? That's not a virtue, that's shameful.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 04:41 PM
1

No one has killed more in this world than the left; with enough power, leftist men kill a lot. The fact that they behave in an emasculated way in the expectation of gaining vaginas doesn't mean they are peaceful, it only means they are weak.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 10:47 PM
8

the most violent men have sex
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 10:43 PM
–

It's about not being artificial, like an AI, nor supernatural like a ghost.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 04:13 AM
-1

None. My wife is bisexual, so wisdom teeth wouldn't be a problem for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 04:00 AM
1

Unless it's that visceral attraction given to only a minority of men, then the signals will be ambiguous, because women are terrible communicators. Especially when you're a guy that women are unusually attracted to. I only became clear about these signals after I got married, became more attractive, and they became frequent. Even if I were single, I wouldn't approach her, as there's always room for a plausible refusal. If I were, either the woman would have to be explicit about what she wants, o…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 10:39 PM
11

If the man is explicit, you have the power to send him straight to jail. That's why I think crossing the line slowly and waiting for a reaction is justified.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 10:37 PM
5

Female psychology is not a guarantee of truth. They may think that way and be wrong, and in fact they are, because most violent acts are committed by sexually successful men.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 10:25 PM
1

Not that you should let strangers flagrantly disrespect you either obviously, but it’s not really the same at all I think it largely depends on the degree of disrespect. If it's minor and comes from someone I'll never have to deal with again in my life, I might let it go to save myself stress and energy. But in all scenarios, it's something a partner isn't equipped to handle.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/25 02:11 AM
14

I find it interesting how you ask a question for clarification, then you create your own answer to the question, and then judge the moral character of the answer you yourself created.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 04:01 PM
17

It depends on how attractive the man is. The same woman who was constantly beaten by her handsome ex-boyfriend breaks up with her current average boyfriend just because he spoke loudly. The same woman who was cheated on dozens of times by her handsome ex-boyfriend breaks up with her current average boyfriend just because of a suspicion of infidelity.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 02:59 PM
3

It's simply a definition of the nature of the relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 06:25 AM
1

OP is the one who validates rape when using the argument of natural selection. Because in this case, rape would be adaptation. The one who is best adapted wins and passes on their genes.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/25 06:33 AM
0

When I see the number of single mothers out there, it seems like women are making poor choices. When you're stupid and make bad choices, it would be better if your parents chose for you. That's how it was when I was a child and it worked; I think that should extend to women until at least age 35.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/25 06:32 AM
1

Either you live in a country that is economically better off than I am.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/25 11:12 PM
2

I think you're right. But the situation I'm referring to is the second most common.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/25 11:12 PM
1

That would be another matter. In this case, the younger woman would be a "victim of pedophilia," even though she is over 18.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/25 11:04 PM
2

A lot of people call 20-year-old women children or teenagers when this happens, you can see it right here in this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/25 11:03 PM
0

Most people, men or women, in their 40s have not yet achieved financial stability.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/25 11:02 PM
0

You can't tell how much income a woman has just by seeing a random couple on the street.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/25 11:01 PM
3

I understund your point
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/25 10:51 PM
5

An older woman also doesn't want "old fart" or "hanging balls," but in this case, the same judgment doesn't apply.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/25 10:23 PM
1

You're not the only one. You don't seem to know the difference between "necessary" and "sufficient."
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 06:42 AM
5

The men in this subreddit haven't even existed since the world began. The oldest ones here must be 50 years old at most, which is well under a billion years.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 06:39 AM
6

A person who can wait has far more control than someone who cannot. The slave to their own desires, however, truly lacks control.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 06:36 AM
2

I don't know if it's a sincere belief or if it's a woman trying to shame a man she can't have. I find it hard to believe that anyone genuinely thinks that a 35-year-old man who is with a beautiful, promising 25-year-old woman is a loser, while a 35-year-old man who is with an indebted single mother of 40 is a winner. 9.9 out of 10 times, women prefer the first man to the second.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 03:27 AM
1

An older, successful man has many gold diggers after him, and many of them are older. Therefore, even if it's a transactional relationship, it's still better to be with a younger, fun, and vibrant woman than with an older, frail one. The idea that older women are more virtuous and would be genuinely interested in him rather than his money is a myth. I was born quite poor and am now well-off, and both in my personal experience and observing the people around me, older women value a man's career m…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 01:36 AM
4

This is very sad, but it's true. I've seen it happen quite a bit: lonely, almost virgin guys, when they start a promising career, get involved with older women and/or women with children. It's sad because they are the type of men these women rejected 10 years ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 01:26 AM
2

That's true, but often women who measure a man's worth by how much sex he gets say that older men who attract younger women and sleep with them are losers, and that's incongruous.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 12:18 AM
1

Beta Bux
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 03:11 PM
–

Her brother isn't "dudes (plural)". She was talking about her brother; drawing a conclusion about "dudes" based on her account is a huge logical leap. I find it very difficult to say this in a short sentence in English, hence the explanation. I used Google Translate because I'm mentally exhausted right now to try writing it in my own words in English.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 03:30 PM
–

Her brother not is "dudes"
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 03:17 PM
–

True
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 03:11 PM
2

I don't know English at a level that allows me to grasp the nuances of what is being said, but giving gifts is often a reflection of love. "She didn't even mention love" doesn't make sense, because doing things for someone and giving gifts are, in both cases, the language of love.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 05:39 PM
5

They speak to signal virtue. They want to appear virtuous, not superficial. Judge them by what they do, not by what they say.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 01:45 AM
-1

Men are going to revolt against that sort of regime. They won't. Men support this type of situation; they are the first to mobilize against the accused, even resorting to physical aggression. Many men support this thinking it will never happen to them, and believing that supporting it gives them credibility with women. In reality, if one of these men is innocently accused of sexual assault and suffers the consequences, I think it's fair, because that's what he sows. I feel sad for those who suff…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 02:34 AM
19

You're right. Although I make an exception for religious women, who, on principle, advocate sex only after marriage. However, the others, who see contracting sexual services as something morally different from casual sex, are just hypocrites.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 01:47 AM
–

Women also have casual sex with men who don't like them.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 06:28 PM
2

They don't have the power because men don't have the same variety of options. A man "choosing" better can mean giving up on having a family altogether if his only two options aren't good. A woman choosing better simply means choosing a nice guy among several other nice guys. It simply means choosing, while she's young and attractive, the guy you'd want to choose if you had children with someone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/25 11:11 PM
–

An average man needs to dedicate himself to the relationship if he wants to keep a younger woman, because she has so many options that any small mistake on his part causes the line to move and someone else to take her place. Older women, however, tolerate so much wrongdoing from their husbands just so they can maintain the relationship. I can understand. It's what happened to me in my career. Before the pandemic, the IT sector was horrible, and no one hired remote workers. I put up with any shit…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/25 03:06 PM
1

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 09:25 PM
9

I'm married. In my experience, single women or women in bad relationships simply adopt appearance standards they don't meet, and to achieve this, they have to sacrifice good personality standards. Furthermore, such a woman tends to feel superior even to men she doesn't qualify for.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 09:25 PM
2

True
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 03:28 PM
–

True
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 11:18 PM
–

Women also think they're more attractive than they actually are. And they think this much more than men, because many of them see themselves with makeup and think it's part of their beauty. Women often don't understand why the men they sleep with don't commit to them. You specifying "men" in your post is kind of pointless, when both men are like that, and women are more so.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 11:17 PM
3

It's even easier for him, being physically attractive helps a lot in getting a job, selling things, closing deals, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 04:18 PM
1

I mean this is all fairly basic but practical advice to become more physically attractive, which is 100% something you should do if you're struggling with dating. What about this advice do you think is bad? That was MY advice. You want me to disagree with MY advice?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 02:19 AM
1

Unless she wants to have children and cant provide for them That "and..." is completely unnecessary. To have children, you already need a man. Even for a woman to exist, you need a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/25 09:50 PM
1

Even when I was single and rejected by women, I would occasionally be approached by a gay man. It happened less than once a year, but it did happen. But after I started dating/engaged/married, the men disappeared, and women appeared. It's not always the case, but I don't have to do anything for some interested women to show up.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 03:09 AM
–

> tall, handsome man with a good job If you are like this, there is no need for a strategy, just exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 03:06 AM
19

when many men cant even properly wash their ass Men like this are the ones who don't need to be different. Women who complain that "hygiene is the bare minimum" are still sleeping with these unhygienic men because they're good-looking.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 10:22 PM
0

So it's actually a great example of a woman being forced to do something she doesn't want to do because a man is incompetent. Rose’s family is fictional. Fiction can only serve as an example within its own fictional universe, not in the real world.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 06:45 AM
1

The sinking ship is only the basis for the main story of the film
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 06:36 AM
3

Henry Cavil and Chris Evans are different men
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 11:23 PM
18

I have a group of friends with 5 women, 3 of whom are overweight and 1 of whom is single and NOT OVERWEIGHT. She has a child and is physically attractive, but she can't seem to find a relationship. I frequent several such environments, and there are many overweight women who have no trouble finding a partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 11:01 PM
6

"go to the gym" it's super practical advice. There's an instructor there, and they'll give you the details of the exercises after analyzing you. The trainer is the one qualified to delve into this in depth, not me.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 05:22 AM
13

Guys Women Like: Hot Bad Boy Guys; Hot Nice Guys; Hot Gentle Guys Clean Hot Guys; Dirty Hot Guys. Guys Women DON'T Like: Ugly Bad Boy Guys; Ugly Nice Guys; Ugly Gentle Guys; Clean Ugly Guys; Dirty Ugly Guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 04:42 AM
2

Moisturizing your face isn't the same as washing your face. You can have a super clean face and dry skin.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 04:17 AM
2

Because they mistakenly believe what women say much more than what women do.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 02:01 AM
2

Of course, a woman who wants to fake it likes it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/25 01:03 AM
–

They want to be sexualized by Chad. If a man she's not attracted to sees her in a sexual way, she'll hate him and consider him a creepy pervert.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/25 12:34 AM
1

They're not handsome, tall, or wealthy, but they have good personalities and are interesting people, making them suitable friends. They're not ugly enough to be considered repulsive, and they tend to be helpful and kind. He has characteristics that a woman would appreciate in a friend, or as a future husband if everything goes wrong for her, but because he's not physically attractive, there's no romantic prospect.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/25 06:55 AM
1

I think they tend to have worse personalities because they can get away with it more easily. However, they are mistakenly seen as having better personalities because of the Halo effect.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/25 06:51 AM
1

Irrelevante para a analogia. E reprodução é um instinto básico, tal qual sobrevivência, mas ainda irrelevante para a analogia
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 10:22 AM
2

You moved the goalposts to answer me.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 09:39 PM
1

If you are hungry, you have a greater motivation to eat something from someone's trash can. Now if you are fed up, this would be unthinkable. Eating food from the trash can seems like a bad decision, but not everyone has the same freedom to make that decision.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 09:37 PM
1

And if you're an ethnic it's that much worse. Is there anyone who is not of any ethnicity?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 09:33 PM
3

Exactly. And honestly? I consciously do the opposite because I know how much good looks make someone overestimated in competence and character. When I see someone very attractive occupying an important position, I already suspect whether the person is really competent to occupy the position, and how much the Halo effect of people helped them get there.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 09:31 PM
2

Women who aren't shitty women either want to stay single or quickly exit the dating market. The men who suffer are fighting for the leftovers, which are low quality women. It's not that they reject women who are worth it, it's that women who are worth it have better options in looks and money, while women are used for sex by men who are more physically attractive than the nice guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 09:25 PM
0

Exactly like those other women don't have other options. Those other women have other options.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 09:20 PM
4

The "wedding ring" effect is real, and since getting married, I've started attracting women I never did when I was single. The "cute friend" becomes, for some women, a viable partner when he commits to another woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 12:16 AM
1

Why must looks and personality be mutually exclusive? Who said that? I don't understand the expectation that women should literally tie ourselves to life with men we don't think are hot. I'm telling her to do just the opposite. To get involved with an attractive man with a good personality while she can, and not wait for her children and Cronos to force her to sacrifice her own standards of attractiveness. Curious why you say that? Because this creates a tendency to get involved with committed m…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 12:14 AM
3

Sometimes I do it when my wife wants it, even if she doesn't want to, because it's my moral obligation. Although after a little provocation from her, I usually start to want it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 12:08 AM
1

Escolha o cara com a personalidade que você procuraria se tivesse 2 filhos, mas com a aparência que você procuraria quando ainda não tem filhos. As a married man, I say that pre-selection is a terrible way
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 11:41 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter