TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Erebus77 Archive

View 1 post and 148 comments by Erebus77 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

Erebus77/r/MensRights31/03/12 10:30 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Alternatively an underdog college comedy, kind of like Revenge of the Nerds meets Al Bundy's No Maam.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 04:17 AM
2

Just google "feminism unisex bathroom" and you'll find a tonne of advocacy for them.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 04:14 AM
16

K, I respect your opinion. But hear me out. ...and those groups will have secret handshakes and they will have a dance that they perform on special days. Reducto ad absurdum aside, both Oxford and Cambridge are well known for harbouring numerous secret societies throughout their histories. The infamous "Cambridge Four" ring of spies were born from The Apostles, a society at Cambridge. It is not so far-fetched to imagine a resurgence of underground or secret groups, given the over-legislation and…
/r/MensRights28/09/14 06:19 PM
130

Control. Right now, a fraternity is a place where decisions are made without the supervision of women. This is anathema to them, as they feel that they have the right to supervise men as a gender, and only allow men to do things that they themselves approve of. As the unrelenting onslaught of grasping female hands continues, you will find no bastion of maleness will go untouched. They're already advocating for unisex bathrooms for crying out loud. This, of course, does not negate the male need f…
/r/MensRights28/09/14 04:43 PM
16

So let me get this straight: A woman is dismayed at her flabby, saggy body. Rather than do something productive about it, she decides to attempt to indoctrinate the males that she has under her control -her own sons- into seeing her flabbiness as the norm, thereby benchmarking her own physique as what a "real woman looks like". She's attempting to establish herself as the penultimate woman in her own son's eyes. What vanity!
/r/MensRights13/09/14 07:32 PM
2

Oh I get it. It's ironic. See, the tree is standing in a field of stumps, claiming that because they haven't cut him (her?) down too, that humans can't be bad. BUT WAIT. It's analogy of #womenagainstfeminism isn't it!! What it's REALLY saying is we DO need feminism because i DO blame all men for the actions of a few #yesallwomen!! TIL all men are responsible for the misfortunes of women. Each and every one of you bears the ORIGINAL SIN of being MEN. It is YOU, specifically, individually, who bri…
/r/MensRights09/08/14 12:58 AM
8

Ironic misandry, then, allows feminists to contest the idea that they are radical man-haters, while simultaneously owning the fact that full equality between men and women remains a radical notion. Yes, by behaving like radical man-haters, you are doing an excellent job of proving that you are not radical man-haters.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 11:25 PM
8

I fear that the only lesson she will have learned from this whole ordeal is to commit her acts of violence by proxy, rather than in person. If only she were in a position to ideologically indoctrinate a large number of impressionable young people so as to carry out her will, while maintaining a plausible deniability.. oh wait.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 08:07 PM
10

It starts with: I’ve seen three couples, all weathered Euro-style women of a certain age with nubile twentysomething (or younger) Gambian men, holding hands in the bright sun. And then proceeds to make the distinction of: The trend of female tourists visiting the Gambia for sexual relationships with adult males... Very important that we don't suggest that these sex-tourists are exploiting minors, or trafficking in child prostitution. That's only for those awful awful pervert men.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 07:58 PM
2

Does Harry Potter advocate witchcraft in children? Does The Lottery advocate stoning people to death for shits and giggles? Get a grip. It's a song. Its a song that tells a story. Stories are a way to experience and explore different realities, and different viewpoints, without having to live them yourself. What this shrill kill-joy hasn't conceived yet is that you can tell stories about things, and not be advocating those things. By reading the story that Lynn Parramore has concocted, I was abl…
/r/MensRights14/06/14 01:24 AM
4

I thought the Duluth Model was a domestic violence policy that created a "primary aggressor" scenario that virtually guaranteed the stronger party (usually the man) would be arrested and removed from the house. I think you're referring to the "Tender Years" doctrine, wherein custody is usually granted to the woman because young children need their mother more than their father or somesuch baloney.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 01:31 AM
-3

I'm just pointing out a logical fallacy that seems to be prevalent in feminist circles. I think that putting the power to determine policy in the hands of a group that has almost uniformly experienced -or claims to have experienced- rape, is like staffing the traffic commission exclusively with people who have lost a limb in a car crash. There's bound to be a lack of objectivity. Furthermore, personal experience is not a prerequisite for knowledge or empathy on a subject.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 07:29 PM
-8

It has not escaped my attention that most feminists need to have been raped, in order to legitimise their voice on the subject. It's like a particularly distasteful merit badge that they must earn to gain authority in the hierarchy.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 04:33 PM
30

Because feminists will never never permit men to have a space that is not under their supervision, if not their control. Segregated schooling necessarily implies that men would get a school of their own (albeit about 20% smaller than the womyn's school, college enrollment rates, yadda yadda). These schools would be outside their ability to control and police, and antithetical to their entire movement.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 04:28 PM
5

At the time, it was a relief to be trusted. In hindsight, how can it be, in a he-said-she-said situation, that the accuser is considered to be wrong by default, and the accused presumed innocent? To consider the accuser of a crime to be wrong by default is to accept that the natural state of humanity is innocence. To assume that accusers are correct by default is to assume that humanity is essentially criminal in nature, with innocence an exception to the rule. I know which version of humanity I…
/r/MensRights12/03/14 09:04 PM
0

In some ways yes. It has always bothered me that one stance is "It's mostly women who slut-shame, so therefore it's a non-problem", while another stance is "so what if most violence against men is inflicted by other men, violence is still a problem!". The answer I think is to remain focussed on the problem and how to correct it, and not get bogged down in thinking that once we merely identify the perpetrator, our job is done.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 06:43 PM
13

Here is the argument for the status quo: The draft business world isn't about fairness. At the point where you're selecting citizens by lottery previous training and future potential and basically torturing/enslaving/depersonalizing them, society has determined that circumstances are so dire that fairness goes out the window. Winning is all that matters, because losing would economically doom us all. The draft business world is inherently unfair, and there's nothing you can do to change that. Al…
/r/MensRights09/02/14 11:37 PM
32

Of course they are. They have transcended the need for an actual rape to have taken place, and are able to assign rape statistics to assault, hurt feelings, regret, feeling threatened somehow, and a whole host of other perceived slights. In fact, the field of rape is experiencing an explosion in innovation! Every day, people are discovering revolutionary new ways of being raped!
/r/MensRights07/02/14 06:22 PM
5

Thank you for this; accuracy and logic is important.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 10:03 PM
3

The end result of literally every complaint they have is caused by women, not men. I think this not a good concept to follow through on. There are numerous male problems that are primarily caused by other men, particularly violence issues. Yet we expect compassion and action on those issues, regardless of how they come about. Just because it is primarily women who inflict a certain harm on women doesn't mean that the resultant damage should be ignored. It's a problem like any other. What I take …
/r/MensRights31/01/14 02:07 AM
1

Fashion choices are a symptom of an overall issue: individuality. I believe that men yearn for the right to display their individuality without criticism or disapproval. As it stands, men are meant to have fairly conformist appearances. You can choose between the charcoal suit, the dark grey suit, or even (gasp!) the dark blue suit! Women, on the other hand, are entitled to display their individuality in a multitude of ways, be it radically different hair styles, clothing, eyewear, jewelry, foot…
/r/MensRights29/12/13 03:23 AM
4

They also have no problems disparaging male car mechanics as "grease monkeys" who don't know how to use a computer.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 03:12 AM
0

White feathers during wartime, white poppies during peacetime.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 05:32 PM
3

20 men? What a comprehensive study! Clearly this is a completely accurate representation of the remaining 17,439,980 males in Canada!
/r/MensRights23/12/13 01:06 AM
1

Here’s the thing: discussing one issue does not negate another’s existence (though that concept seems to be difficult to grasp for these particular men). Lets tell the feminists from the UofT that when they riot outside Dr. Miles Groth's talk today! Surely they will recognize the sage words of one of their own, see the light, and "[sit] quietly and respectfully while problems facing men are discussed".
/r/MensRights27/09/13 05:50 PM
7

Perhaps someone should sit her down and explain to her that to most civilized people, being a hypocrite is bad.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 05:57 AM
6

Educate a man and you've taught a man, educate a woman and you've taught a generation. Employ a woman and you provide for a woman. Employ a man and you provide for a family. Both statements imply an appalling selfishness to an entire gender. Both are sexist generalizations.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 08:40 PM
1

First off, she presumes that the only thing that men respect is that another man has "claimed" her. Could it not be that men respect her choice to be with another man instead of them? Could it not be that men respect her relationship status? This is yet another example of the long and storied history of women jumping to the worst possible conclusion in any given situation. To me, "I have a boyfriend" is a polite rejection designed to spare feelings. By saying this, it allows the recipient to bel…
/r/MensRights17/09/13 09:29 AM
287

“No, I really don’t think about (Frank),” she said. “I feel very bad for what happened. I don’t think he’s ever accepted responsibility for what he did. This takes the cake. Astonishing lack of acceptance of her crime.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 04:23 PM
19

They're not angry that he is a man with a happy marriage. It's that he has found happiness that was not portioned out by them. They're angry that he is a man who has nullified all of their power and control. Their disapproval no longer has an effect on him. He is free from their influence and his resources are beyond their grasp.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 12:53 AM
2

It is because women control the social narrative. They are the ones in charge of almost every social environment, and therefore are in a position of power to react in their own best interests in any given situation. If an undesirable man hits on them, he is labeled a creep and a loser, thus maintaining her dignity and high social value. If she is rejected in her advances towards a man, then he is labeled a loser or called gay, thus maintaining her dignity and high social value.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 12:18 AM
4

At first blush this seems like a positive development. However, if you're a pessimist or perhaps prone to conspiracy theories, concerns arise. There's a little alarm bell in the back of my head that's sounding about the fact that a Feminist Women's Center will now have direct control over the health care of men. Will their patients receive the best level of care? Will the staff have the knowledge and training to deal with health care issues that are unique to males? Will health care policies at …
/r/MensRights06/08/13 05:55 PM
1

Patriarchy: the Goldstein to feminism's Big Brother.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 09:28 PM
1

The plantation was a slaviarchy because they got to do all the awesome fun work.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 09:22 PM
2

Well, when you say that you would like to benefit society through affirmative action policies for men, do you mean that in the same way that society has "benefited" from affirmative action for women? It has been deemed that society benefits through having a representational workforce in every occupation. For example, if 60% of an urban area is black, then 60% of the schoolteachers should be black. And if 50% of an urban area is female, then 50% of the doctors, lawmakers, and CEOs should be femal…
/r/MensRights12/07/13 08:09 PM
88

Well I would buy one, and then leave it in the washroom at work. Then I would watch all the women in the office collectively lose their minds as they try to figure out which one of them is the one who's pregnant. Comedy Gold.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 08:48 PM
4

I contend that by wading through thousands of documents looking for words like "fisherman" and "Journeyman plumber", Liz Watson is making a fraction of the difference she would make by ACTUALLY BEING a woman fisherman or journeyman plumber. Women plumbers, carpenters, mechanics, and other tradespeople are more responsible for creating an equal and just society than Liz Watson could ever hope to. I work in a male-dominated industry. The women that I work with take pride in the same title that the…
/r/MensRights04/07/13 01:29 PM
84

Ten weeks after her first daughter was born, Mary, an environmental attorney in Denver, returned to work, taking the firm up on its offer to let her come in four days a week while everyone else remained at five. A month later, Mary found herself exhausted, constantly irritable, and nursing a persistent cough. "I was happy they wanted to keep me enough to be flexible," she said. "But I always felt that the most important decisions were made when I was home relieving the nanny." Instead of providi…
/r/MensRights25/06/13 07:46 PM
4

If you're looking for an educated opinion on men and what they find interesting, why would you ask Amanda Marcotte? She's not a man, has never been a man, and has no idea how to be a man.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 08:29 AM
1

For the same reason that most men are interested in thin, 20-something attractive women. Because they crave it for themselves. Try replacing "privilege" with "status".
/r/MensRights01/05/13 09:37 PM
1

Wait... Christopher Lee narrates random things he finds on the internet?!? ...Can he narrate my grocery list for me? Cuz that would be sweet.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 07:21 PM
7

And they wonder why men are turning their backs on academia and sitting around their basements playing xbox. When presented with this blatant hostility and discrimination, what would any sane person do? I hope this person faces the consequences of what she's done. I hope she is held accountable for her sexist abuses of power. But even if she does, I won't be happy. Why? Because she will never, never think that what she's done is wrong. Even if you sent her to jail, she would still count herself …
/r/MensRights18/04/13 04:36 AM
2

I especially appreciated the comments about how Bill Burr was unusually passionate about divorce and alimony despite having never gone through it himself. Experience is not a prerequisite for empathy. People feel sorry for burn victims, even though they themselves are not burned. People feel sorry for victims of crime, even if they haven't been mugged. Why then is it so unusual for someone to feel passionately about the abuses of the divorce industry?
/r/MensRights12/04/13 08:19 AM
2

"How dare these men not want to spend time with me!? How dare they deny me the RIGHT to sleep my way to the top; to use my sexuality for my own benefit in the workplace!?" So basically, this woman is suing the company because men don't want to spend time with her after work. Because they don't wish to develop a friendly relationship with a litigious woman. What's next; the company will have to institute a "no being friends with each other after work because someone might feel left out" policy??
/r/MensRights11/04/13 08:14 PM
2

I'm sort of torn on this one. On the one hand, the guy is a punching bag for women. ...And he seems to just accept it! It is literally his job. If you were to expand on this and claim that the women in the commercial represent all women, and that the guy represents all men, it is a troubling example indeed. However, the guy is doing a job that helps women defend themselves, presumably from other men. It shows that they understand that not ALL men are the perverts or the flashers or the muggers. …
/r/MensRights07/04/13 07:27 PM
12

I have already written my MLA regarding the matter. I encourage anyone else who lives in BC to do the same.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 04:37 PM
1

I'm really torn on this. Personally, I support the choices of anyone who wants to embrace non-traditional pursuits and pass-times, regardless of which gender, and which gender role, they ascribe to. The problem is this: The message of the video is "It's time to evolve". Great! What you're evolving into is your right as a human, and it's your choice as a human, and no one should take that away from you. But here's how evolution works: Survival of the fittest. It's not survival of the strongest, o…
/r/MensRights25/02/13 05:27 AM
1

The scope of the article is too small. Women And Children First is alive and well to this day. It is practiced before the ship ever leaves the dock. Women represent less than 2% of the approximately 1.25 million seafarers today. One could argue that this statistic is due to discrimination, or cultural biases, or whatever. But I believe that it is simply that fewer women find the challenges of life at sea to be desirable as a career. Over a million men are out there, exposing themselves to deadly…
/r/MensRights10/02/13 11:48 PM
1

This whole thing plays like some college freshman (sorry, freshwoman's) media studies project. Maybe she should have thrown in some more flickery text or out-of-focus faces. Star-wipe to more oppressed women suffering under the tyranny of men!
/r/MensRights10/02/13 07:05 AM
7

Feminism, when distilled down to its dictionary definition, is perfectly acceptable to all but the beardiest MRA. The social, political, and legal equality of genders. Fair enough, right? The problem is that once you depart from that entry-level snippet of feminism, the actual application of the title "feminism" has been perverted into a pro-women, anti-men supremacy movement.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 06:37 AM
2

Feminism is the patriarchy. Feminism the utter reliance on the state, the establishment, and the new social order to create, protect, and enforce their coddled, comfortable lives. Feminism is the grant money that funds their rape statistic studies. Feminism is their domestic abuse industry social workers. Feminism is the Women's Centers on campus, the Harassment seminars, the not-for-profit equality movements, the mandated female board positions, the divorce attorneys, the Women's Health ministr…
/r/MensRights10/02/13 06:16 AM
4

I am slowly starting to realize that women argue in the political arena in the same fashion as they argue in relationships. How often have you, as a man, heard an SO or girlfriend exclaim "You NEVER take me anywhere!" or "God, I do all the work around this house!". To them, at the moment, it really does feel like they do all the work around the house, or that you literally never take them anywhere. But the thing is, you DO take them places and pitch in around the house. Women are using hyperbole…
/r/MensRights26/01/13 07:58 AM
0

God damn. As men we're not allowed to lust after them for their bodies, but as zombies we're not allowed to lust after them for their brains either!?
/r/MensRights24/01/13 10:55 PM
2

Yeah, that would be extremely womanly in fact.
/r/MGTOW09/01/13 03:27 PM
4

Yet another example of the thoughtless biases and prejudices held by the domestic violence industry. I wish I could say that I'm surprised. ...I wish I could say that.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 04:46 AM
9

There is no way that this is not a troll blog.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 07:41 AM
1

You know, if you just read the title of the post, I 'd agree with the sentiment. The way we choose to raise boys in this society is definitely a contributing factor to the frequency of anti-social violent behavior. When I say "we" raise boys, what I really mean is how popular media and contemporary social environments raise boys. I think we need to step back from that and become much more available to our children. Note that I didn't say involved, in the oppressive helicopter-parent way. Availab…
/r/MensRights22/12/12 07:09 PM
50

In a statement, Johnson admitted that she was angry with herself – admitting that when she drinks she gets flirtatious – and apologised to Essex Police and all the real victims of rape. How about apologizing to, oh I don't know, the guys you nearly sent to prison with your bullshit lies!?
/r/MensRights20/12/12 06:41 PM
9

This is the correct answer.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 06:44 AM
6

Indeed, unlike other demographic [sic], white guys as a group are never thought to be an acceptable topic for any kind of critical discussion whatsoever, even when there is ample reason to open up such a discussion. Are you kidding me!? White men, as a group, are criticized and demonized for every social ill under the sun. In fact, any attempt to praise white men for anything, regardless of how insignificant, is met with apoplectic rage and accusations of misogyny and racism.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 10:32 PM
38

Looks like I've got a phone call to make..
/r/MensRights16/12/12 07:58 PM
5

Here here. These people are the ones that enable so much of what we call civilization. Few people will stop to think, as they're munching on their fantail shrimp at the Christmas party, that hardworking men -and yes, women- are out there catching those shrimp on the cold rainy ocean. There are power company employees, ambulance paramedics, bus drivers, air traffic controllers, and a host of other jobs who will be working Christmas day to keep society functioning smoothly. If any of you redditors…
/r/MensRights10/12/12 07:15 PM
7

Do other MRAs agree that Marc Lepine and his crimes should be celebrated? No, but feminists do. Every damn year, the same old trope gets trotted out, and feminists get to have their 2-Minute Hate for men. NOT for Marc Lepine, mind you... For MEN. Marc Lepine is a villain that they love to hate, because he has been perverted into a symbol for what they think they see in ALL men. Marc Lepine = crazy asshole murderer. Marc Lepine =/= Manifestation of every man's dark potential.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 06:15 PM
2

Silly man... Don't you know that "being a woman" IS a job qualification? /s
/r/MensRights02/12/12 10:06 AM
5

"It's all about MEEEEEEEE!"
/r/MensRights01/12/12 05:05 PM
21

What a wonderful example of how men enable women's existence with little to no thanks in return. What would have happened if you had said "No, I'm not comfortable going into an all-women's clinic" and just left that poor old woman stuck?? If it had been me, I would have responded to all the hateful glares with "That's right I'm a man! BOOGIDYBOOGIDYBOOGIDY!!" Edited for spelling
/r/MensRights30/11/12 12:40 AM
3

This woman sure likes saying "rape" a lot.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 02:43 PM
6

"Being a woman" should not be considered a job credential. To do so simply reinforces the notion that men are the default gender, and women are somehow an enhanced version.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 07:03 PM
6

Fake potato is fake.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 10:37 PM
1

‘Don’t you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it. Every concept that can ever be needed, will be expressed by exactly one word, with its meaning rigidly defined and all its subsidiary meanings rubbed out and forgotten. Already, in the Eleventh Edition, we’re not far from that point. But the process will still be continuing long after you and I are dead…
/r/MensRights17/10/12 06:41 AM
12

They tear them down because they might upset some woman. As I have gotten older, I've realized that 99% of men's social role is to make sure that women are contented and comfortable. To upset a woman is to upset the entire social situation. Look at the self-policing that happens when a man gets too drunk and starts saying controversal things in mixed company. Thoughts and feelings that would have gotten a hearty laugh out of a single-sex group are all of a sudden treated with contempt and anxiou…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 03:50 AM
128

I think it's hilarious that when it comes to DNA testing, all of a sudden the baby's consent is important. Chopping off foreskins? Meh. DNA swab? Outrage!!
/r/MensRights09/09/12 05:03 PM
70

It also illustrates womens' willingness to use white-knight muscle to intimidate and bully, and despite how crazy and evil her claims are, they seem to be fine with it.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 04:59 PM
7

If it were me, I would welcome and impartial investigator with open arms. It seems ludicrous to me that an inquisition panel of faculty members would be capable of a fair assessment of the situation, and not have an agenda to push. Even if that agenda is "Protect the university/my gravy-train at all costs" and not "Punish those wicked wicked men I talk about in Gender Studies class", they still stand to gain from one position, and potentially lose from another. Better say he's guilty, "just in c…
/r/MensRights30/08/12 08:07 PM
2

Don't worry, they're coming after video games too. Soon there'll be no place where men can go without hearing the empowering, character-building mantra of "Man up, loser!"
/r/MensRights13/08/12 05:01 PM
1

Ok, I'll bite. This is a question that I've been thinking of posting to r/askfeminists. I haven't because I'm almost certain I will be greeted with open hostility and accusations of having an agenda. However, I feel the overlying premise is sound. My question is: How do women contribute to, and benefit from, "Patriarchy"? You see, this "patriarchy" theory isn't something that was created exclusively by men, and women are just along for the ride. Women mold and shape our society too you know. An …
/r/MensRights10/08/12 09:48 PM
1

I got a message in my inbox saying that I was banned from posting to SRS.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 07:09 AM
1

Don't worry about it. I was banned from SRS a while ago, and I had not even VISITED, let alone posted anything. I think there should be a deally for your Trophy Case for being banned from SRS.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 09:12 PM
1

Waaay ahead of the curve on this one. I saw the self same post on 2XChromosomes a couple days ago, and replied with this, and a shit-storm of epic proportions ensued. SRS got involved too. If anything good came of this, at least I was able to RES-tag a whole slew of crazies so I can ignore them more easily in the future.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 02:37 AM
1

To help answer the first question, let’s look at some statistics. As of April 2012, the Bureau of Prisons established that 10,477 people are in jail for sex offenses, out of a total U.S. adult male population (19 years of age or older) of about 109,188,733 people. In addition, 90% of all reported sexual assaults are committed by men. 90% of 10,477 total sex offenders is 9,429. That means that only 9,429 men out of 109,188,733 adult U.S. men are likely to sexually assault your child (that comes o…
/r/MensRights13/07/12 02:45 AM
3

rhetorical question is rhetorical.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 01:59 AM
14

But that's just it: men are only valuable as a utility to the world, and women can be completely useless at everything and have nothing to offer anyone, but still be valued just for being a woman.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 04:54 PM
3

I think there is a cognitive dissonance here, mostly because the average guy has never ever received an unsolicited comment or advance from anyone. It's simply not a part of reality, and to be asked to sympathise with someone being cat-called is akin to asking a British person to feel sorry for all the horrible perpetual sunshine that Californians have to endure. I can understand it, in an abstract hypothetical way. Too much attention, too many options, too forward; too much. But imagine being a…
/r/MensRights21/06/12 03:37 AM
2

No Women's Centre has ever gotten a lucrative government grant to go around and tell women they weren't raped.
/r/MensRights16/06/12 03:52 PM
26

Watch it buddy! "Thinking" is what starts you down the dark path to rationality and logic! You should feeeeeeeeeel instead.
/r/MensRights16/06/12 03:34 PM
3

If Radfemistan wants to convict me of having a penis, that's fine. There's no extradition treaty between there and reality.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 11:30 PM
5

Yep, happened randomly to me too. I'm struggling to come up with a reason why I should care.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 02:29 PM
1

Get her to pay rent. Seriously. If she is a "tenant" and you are a "Landlord", you have a documented relationship that does not involve co-habitation in a conjugal fashion. Even if it is just $100 a month, make sure that she signs a lease and pays you with cheques. I don't care if you turn around and then hand her $100 for "groceries" or something, but you'll be doing yourself a favour if you CYA right off the bat.
/r/MensRights21/04/12 01:15 AM
1

Is it hate-speech to say that you splitting hairs about a thousandth of a decimal point is pedantic?
/r/MensRights18/04/12 05:22 AM
2

I do not know. I am not a German lawyer. My instinct says that facts (proven, concrete facts) are impartial, and thus cannot express hatred. I believe that in the political environment following WW2, the consequences of holocaust denial were so dire that it was warranted to make it illegal. You disagree. Fair enough; I won't try to change your mind. Edit: I think I a word.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 03:49 PM
1

I think that an excellent example of what I'm talking about is "Friends". It was a running joke in the series that no one knew what Chandler Bing's job was. Ditto for Phoebe; she was just... a person. Contrary to that, a great deal of fuss was made about Joey being a struggling actor and Ross being a Palientologist. By naming Joey a struggling actor, the writers invited the audience to assign certain character traits to him. By expecting him to conform with these predetermined qualities, you are…
/r/MensRights16/04/12 03:32 PM
1

Because secondary characters aren't intended to be rich, well-rounded, fully-explored personalities. They are there to serve a purpose to the main characters of the story. To expect that the narrative of the movie would take time to explain that the guy behind the deli counter is Tony, who likes cycling and oil painting, and who's mom is battling depression, is expecting too much. He's just the guy that hands the main character a coffee. The main character, on the other hand, IS expected to be a…
/r/MensRights16/04/12 02:24 PM
2

Okay. "After an embattled long-distance relationship with his wife Holly (Bonnie Bedelia), John McClane (Bruce Willis) has flown to Los Angeles for a Christmas reconciliation. What he didn't expect was to have to save her life, and the lives of everyone at Nakatomi Plaza. International terrorist Hans Gruber (Alan Rickman) has siezed control in a complex plot to steal millions, and the local police are helpless. With nothing but his wits and his will to survive, McClane is forced to stand up for …
/r/MensRights16/04/12 02:06 PM
1

I understand that free speech is an important human right. However, where does free speech stop and hate-speech start? At what point do the rights of individuals to speak their minds conflict with all moral and ethical norms? Can an idea be so foul, so thoroughly corrupt, that it does not deserve to be a part of the public discourse?
/r/MensRights16/04/12 06:03 AM
0

I think that German history demonstrates why the people who advocate holocaust denial should be segregated from society.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 05:57 AM
11

POINT 2: Looking good 24/7. So, you're pressured to look good all the time, but you only do it for yourself. So who is doing the pressuring? Are you pressuring yourself to look good, and then feeling put upon to do so? How can you feel pressured into doing something that you want to do? I will concede that men are granted a larger spectrum of physique, but women have a vastly larger amount of options about appearance. POINT 3: A gold-digger is someone who selects her partner based on his financi…
/r/MensRights16/04/12 05:37 AM
4

I put forth the following test: 1) Character is the leading male. 2) Character is described by saying who he is, and not what his job is. Examples from reviews taken from Rotten Tomatoes: In 1946, a banker named Andy Dufresne (Tim Robbins).... New York cop John McClane (Bruce Willis).... A paraplegic ex-marine finds a new life on the distant planet of Pandora... For hundreds of years, WALL-E (Waste Allocation Load Lifter Earth-Class) has been taking out the trash....
/r/MensRights16/04/12 02:23 AM
1

I'm not entirely sure I understand your point. Are you saying that your right to cheer for the Nazis is more important to you than your right to live in a fair and impartial society, where people are held accountable for their actions regardless of gender?
/r/MensRights16/04/12 02:02 AM
10

This is how the world should work. Like Germany. Also good about Germany: Christmas markets, public transportation, castles, food, white wines, and economic prosperity.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 10:22 PM
2

Wow, where can I find one of these $283-an-hour government jobs!?
/r/MensRights15/04/12 02:42 AM
0

You haven't shot anyone yet.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 10:44 PM
0

Domestic violence, huh. Sorry, not my cup of tea.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 05:53 AM
2

Good news! When I woke up this morning, I discovered a little red envelope in the corner of Reddit. Turns out that I have been banned from posting to SRS. ...A subreddit that I have never posted to, nor ever subscribed. Apparently SRS believes that my posts are so dangerous that I need to be banned before I even make one. While they're at it, why don't they ban me from UFC fights, Sierra Leone, Tampa Bay Florida, and other places I NEVER EVER WANT TO GO.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 04:04 PM
1

It's not just Carrie Underwood though. Dixie Chicks' Goodbye Earl, Taylor Swift's Picture to Burn... Collectively, they serve to normalize this kind of behavior, and make it appear to be an acceptable option in the event of an acrimonious break-up. These are women that are role models for girls; who are set up by the mass media to be heroes to emulate. Be like Taylor! Be like Carrie! Wear that Covergirl lipstick! Smash your ex's possessions! Girl Powertm !!!
/r/MensRights06/04/12 06:19 AM
15

Fair enough. Revenge: It's a rich tapestry of psychoses.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 05:49 PM
19

Thank you for the reply. The point I was trying to make was that some people will do terrible things to each other when a breakup occurs. If the person is particularly crazy, those things could involve illegal acts, like destruction of property or vandalism. When these crazy people embark on their path of vengeance, they use either their own value system, or their best guess as to what your value system is, in order to choose how best to hurt you. What they choose to destroy can reflect upon wha…
/r/MensRights04/04/12 05:43 PM
172

I remember watching theignoredgender's Misandry in Music video on youtube, and he noted several songs where the singer trashed the man's belongings to "teach him a lesson". I also saw a thread on 2X where the poster searched "ex-boyfriends" and "ex-girlfriends" on google, and posted the results. This all got me thinking about why people do the things they do when they break up. I've come up with some conclusions. Breakups are obviously very hard, and when they're angry bitter breakups people ten…
/r/MensRights04/04/12 04:20 PM
4

I completely agree. People may to use them on innocent individuals "just in case", believing that since they are non-lethal it doesn't matter. The careless and cavalier usage of supposedly non-lethal tasers has lead to a number of deaths. Pepper spray and mace both cause enormous amounts of pain and suffering to people unlucky enough to receive a shot of it.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 07:24 AM
33

Technically, that is a flail. A mace is more like a big metal club. If it has sharp metal spikes on it, then it is a morning star.
/r/MensRights01/04/12 07:24 PM
3

This question seems simple on the surface, but if you think a little bit, it becomes quite difficult to articulate. As a man, I'm proud of what other men have accomplished. However, they didn't accomplish them in the name of men as a gender. It's not like Sir Edmund Hillary stood on top of Mt Everest for the first time and said "Yeah! Man-power!". So while I'm proud that men have done these things, I don't believe they did them as a "man", but rather as a human. I would have to say that the repu…
/r/MensRights29/03/12 07:46 AM
5

I found the language in this article to be incredibly condescending.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 05:34 PM
3

I have a pet theory that I would like to present for critical examination and feedback, if I may. I believe that slut-shaming can be viewed in the context of traditional gender roles, and the abandonment thereof. The traditional female gender role is one of chastity and purity, who rations her treasured sex to only those that truly truly deserve it. The ultra-traditional woman who waits until marriage for sex may view premarital sex as sluttish. Likewise a woman who engages in premarital sex wit…
/r/MensRights14/03/12 02:57 AM
7

We don't know what happened before this video recording started: people don't just have their phone out with record on stand-by in case some shit happens, so maybe he did do/say something stupid or aggravating before the recording started. Quit blaming the victim. Just because she was wearing slutty clothes doesn't mean she deserved to get raped Just because he petted her dog doesn't mean he deserved to get beaten. Emotionally or physically traumatic? I seriously doubt it. You are not the arbito…
/r/MensRights13/03/12 10:04 PM
11

I'm tired of hearing the same old propaganda of "Hey men! Stop raping" and "Men can prevent rape!". Y'know who rapes women? Any guesses? RAPISTS DO. Not men. Rapists. I have it on good authority that most pedophiles are right-handed. When can I expect all the right-handed people to be rounded up and given the "Don't be Pedophiles" speech?
/r/MensRights12/03/12 01:53 AM
19

I can't say I really agree with that language.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 07:02 AM
159

To borrow a line from feminists themselves: Yes, it hurts to surrender some of your privilege. It's difficult when you've had it for so long that you don't even see it as a privilege at all. But trust us, it'll be for the best.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 12:33 AM
3

Exactly. The woman in the article goes on and on about the "lost opportunity" of exchanging her career for the role of child-care. It's not a lost opportunity, it's a changed opportunity. If we were to follow her logic, men should be awarded sole custody of any children during a divorce to compensate him for the "lost opportunity" of being a stay at home dad, because he was forced to go to work to support his family.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 10:19 PM
26

Ginny, a college senior who was really raped when she was 16, suggests that false accusations of rape can serve a useful purpose. "Penetration is not the only form of violation," she explains. In her view, rape is a subjective term, one that women must use to draw attention to other, nonviolent, even nonsexual forms of oppression. "If a woman did falsely accuse a man of rape, she may have had reasons to," Ginny says. "Maybe she wasn't raped, but he clearly violated her in some way." I think that…
/r/MensRights08/03/12 08:31 AM
1

It's human nature to complain about things. Everyone does it. Men, women, children, the elderly, the young, fat people, skinny people; the works. You have to listen to what they're complaining about to know if everything is alright, not if they're complaining. If that is the best that Swedish feminists can come up with, I will shed precisely zero tears for their struggles. How about focusing their energy on raising money for Afghan girls' schools, or poverty relief in Sudan, or fighting the encr…
/r/MensRights06/03/12 06:08 AM
16

Still, I'm not convinced we should focus on What about me, Mom? when (if) your boy asks about girl empowerment. It's about explaining some of the basics, like the historical -- and, let's face it, current -- fight for gender equality. Holy hell. She can't stop. Not even for one second. When that poor little boy asks "am I allowed to be whatever I want to be?" she doesn't say yes, or tell him that he's just as good as anyone, or offer any praise at all. Instead she gets on her soap-box and preach…
/r/MensRights06/03/12 05:49 AM
75

Quit trying to money-shame me. If women can abandon their traditional gender roles and be a slut, I can abandon mine and not provide for them.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 03:30 PM
4

Finally, a feel-good story on /Mensrights! It goes to show you that there ARE some people out there with some common sense and empathy, who truly want a just and equal system for everyone. A fine victory for men and their children in Minnesota.
/r/MensRights26/02/12 04:35 PM
7

I loved the part where she equated "slut-shaming", or disapproval of the willful abandonment of the traditional chaste woman role, with "deadbeat dads", or disapproval of the willful abandonment of the traditional male provider role. I never thought of it that way, but it makes total sense. I have a new retort it seems.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 11:46 PM
6

I am unable to move on financially and start a new family with another woman (I am attractive enough and have the personality to get women quite a bit younger than me), because no woman wants a man that keeps $15,000 a year and goes deeper in debt every month to make ends meet. Here is the poisoned revenge of a woman who feels slighted. Not only is it vital for her to "move on" and have a happy life with her new boy-toy, it is imperative that she ensure that her ex-husband is no longer capable o…
/r/MensRights23/02/12 03:55 PM
8

I was thinking that a retart is a former teen pop star who is trying to make a comeback.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 11:14 PM
14

So... An advertisement that will scan my facial features and then NOT show be the ad. I heartily endorse the spread of this technology! Hopefully in the future I won't have to see any advertising in public places at all. The insidiousness of this technology, however, is the possibility of presenting one dataset to one gender, and another dataset to the other. Imagine if electronic price tags on goods would change depending on if the purchaser was male or female. Imagine if an "open" sign on a bu…
/r/MensRights20/02/12 07:30 PM
0

The "trigger warning" culture in some circles has never sat quite right with me, because I think it is mis-used by people. "Trigger warnings" are something that Critical Incident Stress councillors in the emergency response world talk about. Y'know, firemen, cops, EMTs, Coast Guard, Ground Search and Rescue, etc. Lets say that a fireman attends a horrible car crash. It's a pile of twisted steel, with shattered glass all around, and a beautiful blonde little girl, twisted and ruined and dead in a…
/r/MensRights19/02/12 04:23 PM
16

Well, AlfieRome makes a good point about how it's society that has rendered him helpless in the situation. However, if I were to find myself in this immediate situation, if the 3rd party would come in and make it all about the angry woman instead of addressing the man, it might work. Come in and be like "Hey angry bitch! That shit is not acceptable and you need to chill." The last thing you want to do is focus on the man and say "Are you ok? Did she hurt you? How're you feeling right now?" or "Y…
/r/MensRights19/02/12 03:35 PM
5

I'd just like to take the opportunity to applaud the mother for standing up for her son's rights. Women can sometimes get a bad rap in this subreddit, especially when the courts are involved, so it's nice to hear about one that stands up for what is right.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 03:16 PM
32

It seems like the modern woman is hell-bent on becoming a grotesque pantomime of a man. She gets liberated, educated, employed, promoted, enfranchised, and entitled; ultimately becoming that which the feminist machine campaigns so fervently against. In essence, a man. This is what renders THEM unmarriagable. Rather than becoming something that men want, she becomes something that SHE wants.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 05:58 PM
57

I cannot upvote this enough. The lack of self-awareness that this type of woman has is simply astounding.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 05:26 PM
1

To me, this situation describes an exchange of status. He revels in the status that a hot young woman provides him. He bros it up in the camaraderie of the rugby team, that he worked hard to be a part of. He saw something he wanted, and he took it. A spot on the team, a position at a prestigeous university, a beautiful woman.... She was so excited about the Annual Formal Rugby Banquet, and gaining access to this exclusive event. She basks in the status that her rugby-playing boyfriend provides h…
/r/MensRights04/02/12 03:50 PM
9

male expandability Are you calling me fat?
/r/MensRights31/01/12 10:52 PM
4

...and resist the urge to remind them that unpaid domestic labor has value too, and that women’s denial of that value in the early days of feminism is part of why men and women are in this mess today. That if she was the kind of wife and mother I’d been when I stayed at home, and he’d had to pay her a fair-market wage for her child-care, housekeeping and maybe even home/yard maintenance duties, her income might have been almost as high as his own during the marriage. Okay, so stay-at-home women …
/r/MensRights25/01/12 04:10 PM
2

Great post. I tried in another thread to make the point that the captain is in ultimate command of everyone on board, and some tool took exception to it and I got downvoted. He also advocated bludgeoning the life boat officer unconscious so that he and his family could get the same lifeboat. One point though: even in the middle of the atlantic, someone will come and rescue you. It may take a few days for a responding vessel to arrive, but help will come. The global Search and Rescue system divid…
/r/MensRights25/01/12 03:37 PM
8

Exactly. When evacuating a mass-casualty situation, there are two different orders of priority, depending on whether the scene is stable or unstable. A stable scene is one that is unlikely to degrade into a more life-threatening situation, while an unstable scene is the opposite. There are: Black: dead people Red: serious injuries requiring immediate care Yellow: Injuries that, if left untreated, may become reds Green: walking wounded White: uninjured people In a stable scene, the evacuation pri…
/r/MensRights16/01/12 01:53 AM
4

Thanks for the reply. Like I said in one of my other responses, I'm certainly not defending the actions of this particular crew. Their list of errors is quite long, so I won't try and capture them all here. The WTC comparison is, in this individual case, rather justified. The crew failed to establish control, had no situational awareness, and did a terrible job of keeping the passengers and their own people informed. Electrical problem!? Gimme a break, they knew exactly what had happened. They d…
/r/MensRights16/01/12 01:42 AM
-4

And if it is a life or death situation, neither do you. Quite the contrary. The officer in charge of the lifeboat station has been delegated his authority from the commanding officer, who is legally responsible for everyone on board. When you signed on as a passenger, you agreed to follow the lawful commands of the C/O and his subordinates. If you had tried to separate me from my family I would have punched you square in the face until you were out cold. Do you feel that violently assaulting the…
/r/MensRights15/01/12 04:18 PM
1

It sounds to me like this situation was a giant clusterfuck from the get-go. The crew allowed panic to grip the passengers, leading to some very poor decision-making. Now, obviously in this circumstance the crew let everything get away from them, and none of the above things really happened.
/r/MensRights15/01/12 03:57 PM
8

Disclaimer: I'm an experienced mariner, so I know a little about emergency situations of this type. It sounds to me like this situation was a giant clusterfuck from the get-go. The crew allowed panic to grip the passengers, leading to some very poor decision-making. It seems that everyone thinks they know what to do in a marine disaster. "It was just like the Titanic!!" You don't. Here's some tips. A) When the alarms go off, report to your muster station wearing warm clothing. Bring any medicati…
/r/MensRights15/01/12 02:51 PM
3

I'm of two minds when it comes to the "unsafe" thing... On the one hand, no one would think twice about Blaming The Victim if the victim in question, say, jumped into shark-infested waters. Don't I have a right to swim? C'mon people!?! But if you apply the same logic to a frat party, you're saying that all men are essentially animals, which has some very dark possibilities. Animals can be controlled "for public safety". Animals can be forbidden from certain places. Animals can be rounded up if t…
/r/MensRights09/01/12 06:36 PM
1

TIL I am "the dregs".
/r/MensRights05/01/12 09:26 PM
1

Prospective Perspective
/r/MensRights22/11/11 08:22 AM
3

This woman sure likes saying "rape" a lot.
/r/MensRights15/11/11 03:43 AM
12

One day someone should tell women that there is a difference between their job and their relationships. Half of this article reads like a big What-I-want-in-a-man column. "Support me!", "Value me!", "Pander to my ever-changing whims!"
/r/MensRights14/11/11 08:44 AM
19

No one has the right to define what a "real man" is. We're all real men. If women have fought and won the war against their own gender-stereotyping, then men should do the same.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 04:28 PM
9

There are times when men just don't want to be around women. ...Any women, including significant others. This of course is incompatible to womens' self-image; from the day they're born they are told that they are the light of the room and all men want them, all the time. I'm sure that every guy here has been hanging out with some pals having a good time, and then a woman walks in the room. Do you notice the subtle shift in everything, everyone's posture, the direction their bodies are oriented, …
/r/MensRights10/08/11 04:47 PM
2

Further to this, I remember reading a blog once where the dude solicited the opinions of women on a story about how a wife no longer found her husband attractive due to his weight. The advice that the women commenters gave was then switched around so that it sounded like men giving advice for dealing with a fat wife. These comments were then blind-posted in a second article, which drove the women crazy at how insensitive the "men" were in doling out advice. Does anyone else remember seeing this,…
/r/MensRights06/07/11 03:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter