TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Erens_rock_hard_abs Archive

View 0 posts and 31 comments by Erens_rock_hard_abs on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

There is no doubt a nonzero number of female individuals that does so, yes. What answer are you really looking for? Is your question satisfied as "yes" if this nonzero number is 1?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/19 04:35 PM
1

This isn't really the gatekeeping that OP is talking about though; OP doesn't seem to talk about keeping females out of it as much as being sceptical that they are really into it and verifying their expertise in a distrustful way.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/19 05:53 PM
1

Another thing is probably that there is just more to do to enjoy oneself. Offspring used to be a form of entertainment. A spouse sitting at home after cleaning had little to do and younglings around would make life less boring; now said spouse can just go onto the internet and watch some BBC gangbang porn for entertainment instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/19 03:58 PM
2

I think most characters in most films are uninterestingly written—I'm not really into the whole gender politics surrounding that and I don't really care about the genders of the characters. I think the problem with films is that they are too short to develop interesting characters; I find that in most films character development feels incredulously rushed because of the running time and that in general series feature more interesting characters for that reason. I'll say though that female charac…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/19 02:30 PM
1

If you're not getting approached by women, you arent attractive enough for it to make a difference. Therefore men should rate themselves as a 1 or a 0, 1 being attractive and 0 being unattractive. Wouldn't it be better to take into account how often one is approached? If an ugly bastard got approached exactly once, does that mean it moves from 0 to 1 henceforth?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/19 10:33 AM
0

For instance, what if you found a guy you were in love with but he wanted to be polygamous since he felt he was a 'free spirt' and wanted to enjoy life to the fullest? Would you accept that? If it was then it wouldn't get married to begin with. I wouldn't do polygamy because I don't do marriage; and that's the only reason; polygamy is binding oneself to even more individuals.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/19 03:00 AM
3

My stance on this is very simple: Currently in almost all jurisidctions anything related to "family and sex" is weirdly exempt from normal contract and liability law; I think it should not be, and should just be treated the very same as everything else related to contract and liability law. So I believe that when all the normal conditions are met like quid pro quo and liability that abortion should be able to be treated as a breach of contract like any other provided those conditions apply; whic…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/19 01:33 AM
1

Never said that there aren't married individuals in the Netherlands; I said exactly what I said: I'm pretty fucking sure that the overwhelming majority of Dutch females has no interest in marriage given how rare they are; and I also know for a fact that marriage inversely correlates with level of education in the Netherlands, just like having children and other forms of traditionalism generally do.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/19 01:17 AM
1

And anyone that signs a business contract under the influence of mind altering drugs is an idiot, and love is a mind altering drug. In fact, given the current divorce rate one might say the most insidious problem with marriage is that people make life-altering decisions while in love. It's a drug- a toxic one at that. And scientifically proven to wear off.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/19 06:40 AM
1

a giant party where she’s the center of attention Because I hate normal loud giant parties, but weddings are increddibly boring, and on top of that it feels super awkward to just stand there with all eyes at you, also it's mad expensive. a contract in which there are literally no downsides (she has no responsibilities) but there are rewards (for her) when she decides to leave Of course there are downsides; marriage is a worse deal for both involved financially; the major problem with marriage is…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/19 06:37 AM
2

So first you say it's to do with intellect, and then you say it's just some primal instinct and there's nothing rational about it? I've no idea whether the average female wants or does not want marriage and it definitely depends on culture; I'm pretty fucking sure that the overwhelming majority of Dutch females has no interest in marriage given how rare they are; and I also know for a fact that marriage inversely correlates with level of education in the Netherlands, just like having children an…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/19 06:33 AM
3

But food and breathing are not psychological needs; they are physical needs; the human bodies dies without it. Recently, the Netherlands adopted this stance and decided that sex is a human right This is so pulled out of context by the international news to dramatize what actually happened. Disabled individuals get a stipend, some of those spent that stipend on prostitutes as is their right; some idiot sued them and argued that they couldn't spend it on prostitutes; the courts were like "of cours…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/19 01:29 AM
1

The same thoughts when I generally hear such generalizing claims about some "identity category": most likely the individual that says it experienced this with some members of that category but is a collectivist, rather than an individualist, and thus needs to apply it to all of them. I can't say these things make me irate or move me any more; they're too common for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/19 01:19 AM
2

It turns out that for pretty much any claim there is a nonzero number of both male and female individuals that made it at one point. All these weirdos that make absolute claims...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/19 06:18 AM
1

"ripped" appears in the title. Which says 'women, without exceptions, found muscular "ripped" men most attractive" Nothing like that is in the paper whatsoever; the paper asserts that there is indeed a between positive physical strength assessment and attractiveness. But this in the text of the OP: (more visible musculature as a result of low body fat) Is nowhere found in the actual research; as said the research doesn't even publish what pictures exactly it used.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/19 06:17 AM
1

Lol, the actual research concludes nothing close of what OP is reporting. First off; the actual data of the research doesn't even include what is rated more or less attractive; the only data published is the relationship between the individual's personal assessment of the strength of the body and the attractiveness thereof which is correlative. There are basically two things the research answers How accurate is the subects assessment of the physical strength of the models based on the pictures s…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/19 04:17 AM
1

I understand the meaning of monogamous well, because that's actually a concretely defined thing. But no, there is no "meaning" of committed, it's utterly vague and as I said; you can see in this very thread that it quickly devolves in semantics debates. You've never given a definition thereof, everything you said is about as vague as "cruel and unusual punishment".
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/19 08:46 PM
0

I can't believe you just think you made it less vague. So it's committed if you both "agree that it's committed"? This is not a circular definition at all...
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/19 08:35 PM
0

And yet in this very thread you already have endless semantics debates going on about what is and isn't committed that aren't debates of facts, but debates of words. The word "committed" is so utterly vague.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/19 06:54 AM
1

Yeah, so okay, extremely vague. Are you seriously telling me your working definition in this conversations goes no further than "an engagement or obligation that restricts freedom of action" Come with an actual concrete operative definition that allows a third party observer to objectively conclude whether a "relationship" is "committed" or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/19 03:18 AM
1

What kind of "consequences"? If you live in a jurisdiction that practices "shared possession" and you're the person with fewer assets the consequences to just terminating the marriage and moving with no prior notice are beneficial to you; because it's split 50/50 after that point, so you stand to gain. If you live in a jurisdiction without such shared possessions then there are no consequences; you get a divorce—which can typically be initiated by one of both parties without a show of fault—and …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/19 01:07 AM
1

Hint, hint: the word "commitment" is a meaningless buzzword with no universally agreed upon definition. Debating over what is and what isn't "committed" is about as meaningless as trying to debate whether an activity is "fulfilling" or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/19 01:03 AM
1

Yes. Why would I be in a monogamous LTR if we're never even going to live together, much less get married? Obviously that would be done by individuals that don't want to live together and get married but want monogamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/19 01:01 AM
0

What is the "package" here, what is the definition of "commitment" here? just that label? Regardless—I've the opposite of interest in procreating, in taking care of a human being, and in marriage. I've also the opposite of interest in language like "commitment", vague terms whose meaning is not concretely understood between the participants.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/19 01:00 AM
7

Why would one need a "relationship" for that though? Every time I see the "advantages of a relationship" I'm like "Okay, I got that, and no relationship, so..." I think what it really comes down to is the one big advantage of "And being allowed to tell an individual that it can't have sex with others.", but that doesn't have as nice a ring to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/19 11:50 PM
1

I think if he was wanting to wear women's clothes I'd have different concerns. I don't consider that activity as being in touch with his feminine side. Surely by any reasonable definition of "In touch with one's feminine side" that is a form of it? Seems to me that's just a way of you saying "I don't like it"; but that's different.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/19 04:51 AM
1

Would you be okay if he wanted to wear a skirt at home? That would be much appreciated; I like loose-fitting garments and skirts are quite loose-fitting. Regardless, experience has taught me that different speakers classify "masculine" and "feminine" in completely different ways with endless gatekeeping and semantics debates about it—it's almost like they're complete buzzwords with no coherent definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/19 04:51 AM
6

Whether it's accurate or not in describing my behaviour has nothing to do with how real it is; and that is exactly the problem I have with this, and the blue pill, and all the other dumb pils, that it's sort of based on the assumption that there is some way "how females think, how females act" and "how males think, how males act" and yadibla. There is no pill, or grand philosophy that describes human behaviour, or the behaviour of most other animals for that matter. That having been said, given …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/19 12:49 AM
1

Doesn't matter; in both cases I would just loophole a literal interpretation of the rules and concede to just calling these individuals my "long term partner" but otherwise not spend any time with them. The objective to me is to not have a "long term partner"; if that is not possible, then I would just as said loophole the loops and point out that it's all a label anyway and still not have one but just label it as such, so whatever actual individual it is is completely irrelevant to my master sp…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/19 09:40 PM
1

Okay, let's say that's true. Why would I specifically think this has anything to do with "pressure from males"? I rarely see specifically males "exert pressure" on very attractive individuals? I in fact rarely see any individual—whatever its sex—do that?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/19 01:47 PM
3

Do you genuinely think this is due to "pressure from men"? No? Why would I? It's a mental disorder.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/19 12:36 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter