| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Big Facts.This isn't how we deal with any crime. There has to be realistic evidence to bring a case to court. Imagine what would happen if someone was brought to court for every accident. This just isn't how things work. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 04/10/20 05:46 PM |
| 1 | Big Facts.This is the basis of every western law system. Innocent until proven guilty. The trial of bitter waters is completely the opposite. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 04/10/20 05:33 PM |
| 1 | Big Facts.The state does force them to carry to term, or be tried for murder. Follow up, how do you suppose we treat women who experience miscarriage? And if it's different than abortion, how can you actually tell? How do we treat people who have been raped? Miscarriage is an accident. We believe people unless we have reason not to believe them. Thank you for admitting you support murder (as you define it) when you're ok with it. I did no such thing. Your little points weren't even beginning to be catch-a… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 04/10/20 03:42 PM |
| 1 | Big Facts.Fathers don't kill their children due to financial stress as often as mothers kill their children due to other stressors. It has nothing to do with sexism and has way more to do with statistics.Fathers actually very rarely kill their own children and do so for very different reasons than mothers. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 04/10/20 03:40 PM |
| 1 | Big Facts.So you whole heartedly support the state forcing women to carry a rape baby to term? No. The state cannot force anyone to do that. If that person chooses to perform or induce an abortion on their own, then legally and morally they should be tried for murder. It is double homicide in every western country to kill a pregnant woman. You whole heartedly support the state forcing women to carry infants with abnormalities incompatible with life to tern? If a child isn't going to live postpartem, then … | /r/PussyPassDenied | 04/10/20 03:16 PM |
| 1 | Big Facts.I'm not lying. It is immoral for parents to abandon their children. That's the point I'm making. However, our laws cannot incentivize people to do even more immoral things. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 04/10/20 02:44 PM |
| 1 | Big Facts.As unfun as it is, murdering another human is not moral. Obviously things like ectopic pregnancies weigh one life against another, but two wrongs don't make a right. Additionally, it wouldn't work legally to say argue that rape would be an exception because that would encourage women who wish to have an abortion to make false claims of rape. Obviously this is a nuanced argument, but it follows the same vein as this argument: If someone killed my mother, am I morally justified to kill their mom? … | /r/PussyPassDenied | 04/10/20 02:28 PM |
| 1 | Big Facts.These laws exist to prevent mothers from murdering their children. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 04/10/20 02:16 PM |
| 1 | Big Facts.And a fetus cannot reproduce on its own either, cannot even survive on its own, Neither can a 4 year old and no one is advocating post-birth abortions. The reproduction part of the scientific definition of life refers to a being's ability to, in a proper environment, achieve these things, not to be able to do them at all times. We also don't call sterile people not-alive. If you want to present an argument, you have to actually talk about the topic at hand. If your argument is that people who ca… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 04/10/20 01:39 PM |
| 1 | Big Facts.Of course. I'm not a conservative. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 04/10/20 01:29 PM |
| 0 | Big Facts.It absolutely does not. We eat animals because they are not humans. We don't eat humans because they are humans. Does that need to be made explicit? So a human fetus shouldn't be eaten because it is a human fetus. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 04/10/20 12:22 PM |
| 2 | Big Facts.You guys are so far up you ass, you've reverted back to a worst version of a STEMlord. The entire world of ethics is contained within philosophy. Other social scientists won't touch it because it would reveal many things that we do out of convenience are indeed morally indefensible. A whole lot of people successfully argued that abortion is moral. You know, real scientist . You cannot scientifically argue an ethical statement. That's hilarious. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 04/10/20 12:22 PM |
| 2 | Big Facts.If you remove a two month old fetus from the uterus it will cease all biological functions since it is not yet an independent life form. We've actually survived babies who have been born more than 120 days early. This is not a logical defense of the position that abortion is moral. You've just argued that life must be independent to be valuable and then arguing that just because the mom doesn't have to take care of a newborn means that it is somehow more of a person. This logic makes no sense. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 04/10/20 12:20 PM |
| 1 | Big Facts.Prove it. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 04/10/20 12:17 PM |
| -2 | Big Facts.No. They cannot reproduce on their own. The ability to reproduce is a requirement to be considered alive. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 04/10/20 12:16 PM |
| -1 | Big Facts.Semantics. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 04/10/20 12:16 PM |
| -1 | Big Facts.Sperm are haploid cells, not diploid cells. I had no idea I had to be so pedantic. Sperm cannot reproduce on their own, thus they do not meet the scientific qualities that describe life. Good lord. Can you make a real argument? | /r/PussyPassDenied | 04/10/20 12:16 PM |
| 1 | Big Facts.Do you genuinely believe this to be a logical argument? | /r/PussyPassDenied | 04/10/20 12:14 PM |
| 2 | Big Facts.is comparable to the personhood of a sperm or an egg. A zygote is in every possible sense just as alive as an egg or sperm, and it has just as much capacity (maybe less than a sperm) to do anything related to personhood. This is just patently untrue and belies a misunderstanding of how difficult conception actually is. And then what about zygotes that don't imbed or ectopic pregnancies, should we as a society be doing more to catch those and turn them into viable pregnancies? Considering that ma… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 04/10/20 12:14 PM |
| -1 | Big Facts.The man's right is to not have sex. The child didn't ask to exist, but if the parents chose to force that, the parents bear that responsibility whether they want him or not. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 04/10/20 12:03 PM |
| -5 | Big Facts.A single cell has life. I have no idea what science class you went to. And no, your analogy is false. It's really stunning to me that people don't actually have informed views on this topic. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 04/10/20 12:01 PM |
| 1 | Big Facts.also have to argue that all forms of birth control are indefensibly immoral, and to some extent that waste any sperm or egg is indefensibly immoral. No, you don't. Only a fertilized egg would be a person. If there is no conception, there is nothing immoral. Few contraceptives anymore allow an egg to become fertilized. Condoms, the pill, iuds, none of them involve fertilization. The argument is about the personhood of a fetus, at every stage of development. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 04/10/20 12:01 PM |
| -2 | Big Facts.Learn a bit about philosophy of ethics and come back. The only people to successfully argue that abortion is moral are those who also argue that infanticide is moral. Your argument here is equivalent to the following: Abortion is moral because sometimes miscarriage, e.g. involuntary abortion, is natural. The counter argument is, accidents that kill people aren't immoral, but murder is. The argument of abortion sits firmly in the personhood of the fetus. If you're not arguing about whether or not… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 04/10/20 11:57 AM |
| -11 | Big Facts.Yeah this is incorrect. Abortion, much to people's dissatisfaction, is indefensibly immoral without endorsing infanticide. It is not the child's fault that two adults wanted some happy fun time. The reality is, if you want to have casual, unsafe sex, you accept these risks. The child should be financially cared for regardless of whether or not you want them. They did not ask to exist, the parents forced them to. There are plenty of ways to ensure one doesn't have a child. That's where the buck s… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 04/10/20 11:28 AM |
| -13 | Nobody complements me on my looksWhy did you call her they? Her pronoun is she/her, transphobe. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 15/06/20 12:11 PM |
| 14 | Mary-Kate Olsen DENIED emergency divorce amid COVID-19 court closures despite claiming she's 'petrified' her estranged husband will block her from home and ditch her belongingsHow do you know he represents women in all the cases he works on? Someone HAS to be a divorce lawyer. You're being a child here. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 15/05/20 12:04 PM |
| 1 | Entitled teen girl punches kid and gets fucked.Looks like they're at fat camp. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 26/09/19 02:44 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter