~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Slam then get punchedTrump was impeached and stood trial in front of a loaded senate judiciary committee which acquitted him for political gain. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 31/03/20 11:14 PM |
| 1 | Slam then get punchedI completely disagree. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 31/03/20 08:30 PM |
| 1 | Slam then get punchedKeep believing a moronic reality tv star mate. Maybe look into the evidence yourself before spouting the lies Donald told you. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 31/03/20 07:26 AM |
| 1 | Slam then get punchedI mean that’s what we’re agreeing to disagree on. As you are incorrect about this. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 31/03/20 06:56 AM |
| 1 | Slam then get punchedThat is simply untrue. Listen, I doubt I’ll be able to change your mind, and I know you won’t change mine. How about we agree to disagree? | /r/PussyPassDenied | 31/03/20 06:42 AM |
| 1 | Slam then get punchedIt’s not though is it. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 31/03/20 06:32 AM |
| 1 | Slam then get punchedRussian collusion was not entirely made up, that very suggestion is what made me sceptical of Crowder in that video. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 30/03/20 08:40 PM |
| 1 | Slam then get punchedSorry no, I wasn’t clear. I was asking for examples where CNN made up - by themselves - completely fake news stories. Not when they received inaccurate information and ran with it, or when they pushed a story because of their political bias. Which is what I’ve seen Trump use as his attacks on them. When he banned reporters it wasn’t because they were incorrect it was because he didn’t like the questions they posed to him and dismissed it as fake news (as if was a complete fabrication) not an ina… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 30/03/20 07:00 PM |
| 1 | Slam then get punchedCould you link me some examples? | /r/PussyPassDenied | 30/03/20 06:26 PM |
| 1 | Slam then get punchedThey aren’t fake news, and I’m shocked somebody who is eloquent and intelligent such as yourself could say that. His job and duty to the American people eclipses the right to free speech, just as you wouldn’t say an individual who lied in court was simply exercising their right to free speech - they’d be sent to prison. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 30/03/20 06:15 PM |
| 1 | Slam then get punchedFreedom of Speech is not freedom to lie to the American public in a position of elected authority. As soon as that happens he is damaging freedom of information. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 30/03/20 04:54 PM |
| 1 | Slam then get punchedAside from all the non transparency and decrying of negative stories as fake news that is. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 30/03/20 03:37 PM |
| 1 | Slam then get punchedNo I was simply asking if you were. I never said you did deny it. I’m just curious, because if you aren’t denying it, then you have no new or pertinent point to make. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 30/03/20 12:17 PM |
| 1 | Slam then get punchedSo you’re denying the assertion that he had banned individuals from his press conferences before? | /r/PussyPassDenied | 30/03/20 10:45 AM |
| 1 | Slam then get punchedWhat on Earth are you cracking on about? It’s easy to prove it’s restriction of information. The President is presenting himself to the press for scrutiny (brilliant) but only the press who he likes and will write about his actions in a favourable manner (not brilliant). Therefore he gives access to some information to only those who he has power and control over and is therefore restricting the flow of information. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 30/03/20 07:26 AM |
| 1 | Slam then get punchedHow does any of what you just said contradict the idea that it is a restriction of the freedom of information? | /r/PussyPassDenied | 30/03/20 06:59 AM |
| 2 | Slam then get punchedIf a President is deciding who does or doesn’t have access to his briefings, and only chooses those who will represent the issues entirely in his favour he is restricting freedom of information. If you don’t have a dramatic view of freedom of information you’ll allow it to be compromised as you’re clearly willing to see happen. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 15/03/20 12:37 AM |
| -2 | Slam then get punchedClearly they don’t, there is an American President who denounces news he doesn’t like as fake and refuses to answer questions from reporters he disagrees with. In the United Kingdom the Conservative party refused to allow journalists from the Guardian and Mirror newspapers into their campaign events, only allowing papers which viewed them favourably. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 14/03/20 07:11 AM |
| 1 | Slam then get punchedYeah right wing regimes always allow the freedom of information /s | /r/PussyPassDenied | 12/03/20 07:08 AM |
| 1 | Goodbye James BondGod the horror, she didn’t take his name. Aaaah!! | /r/MGTOW | 17/12/19 07:27 PM |
| 1 | Goodbye James BondHe’s pathetically ignorant. | /r/MGTOW | 17/12/19 07:26 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter