TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Esailija Archive

View 0 posts and 136 comments by Esailija on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

No, the conclusion is not true if you can only show it follows from its premises. You also need to show all the premises to be true as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/15 08:48 PM
2

No, the conclusion is not true if you can only show it follows from its premises. You also need to show all the premises to be true as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/15 08:39 PM
2

Now you are even making more preposterous assumptions. Very very few women want to just have as many one night stands as possible and most of them seek commitment. Assumption with no basis in reality. Men often just go out and try to get laid so his SMV is his league. Assumption with no basis in reality. He can however, get friendzoned by a chick way out of his league just like a slut can fuck above her league. Assumption with no basis in reality. Do you understand you can't just make a claim li…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/15 07:30 PM
1

You are saying "Some people are just more attractive than others" means or makes it easy to conceptualize "Women can fuck above their league". That doesn't make any sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/15 05:24 PM
1

Why does saying unrelated thing x make it easier to conceptualize bullshit y?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/15 04:56 PM
1

Some people are just more attractive than others Ok but this useless truism doesn't support or imply anything you said.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/15 04:38 PM
2

No I did not argue for any change in policy. according to Jean Piaget according to one psychologist who died in 1980 vs current knowledge.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/15 04:27 PM
2

This assumes some kind of universal objective ratings for people. I.E. x is a 40th percentile woman while y is a 50th percentile man. Need I point you to any "ratings" thread to show you how obviously bullshit assumption that is?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/15 04:13 PM
1

The neuroscientific consensus is that the brain generally develops until at least well into 20s. You are admitting to be probably literally retarded.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/15 03:56 PM
2

Are you saying objective ratings exist or are that you are incapable of logic as none of the stuff you say makes sense if ratings are subjective?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/15 09:47 AM
1

That wasn't a claim but a question...
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/15 07:38 PM
1

The burden of proof is on the one making the claim, so there is obviously no such implication.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/15 07:08 PM
1

I did not make any assertion, I questioned yours.I am not your personal search engine, you can find mainstream science's position on whether social sciences are a cult or real science easily yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/15 02:31 PM
1

Some of us have actually worked in academia. Vague and misleading. Also, if you think academia is a cult why would "working in it" it make you more qualified?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/15 02:05 PM
1

Anything that has been labelled "soft science" has been given that label for a reason. Labeled by whom, where and when? What were their credentials? It was ad hominem that was an inverse appeal to authority. This is awkward, you know those are actually valid arguments? It's only when the authority is irrelevant or when the personal 'attack' is irrelevant that the usage is invalid. Also you did not provide any credentials and were probably maximally misleading about them.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/15 12:38 AM
1

Do you mean all social sciences or some of them specifically? Also "well look, it's obvious!!!" is not even an argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/15 12:08 AM
0

No, but thanks for telling me what I think. Your psychic powers should serve you well getting rich. If you don't think that, then don't write as if you do. Don't need psychic powers.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/15 12:04 AM
1

What are your credentials to assert out of hand what is a real science or what is not? If you are a philosopher of science, where can I read your work?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/15 11:59 PM
1

I see you still think that satire is mutually exclusive with counter argument. As for those comments, they mean TBP isn't a opposite of TRP (such an opposite I.E. niceguys, are just as misogynistic) , not that the mockery doesn't contain valid counter arguments.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/15 11:56 PM
1

Where does TBP specifically claim not to be a counter-argument?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/15 11:42 PM
2

Satire or counter-argument is a false dilemma as I just showed you, both are possible at the same time
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/15 11:35 PM
2

Perhaps you mean inspired?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/15 11:34 PM
1

Yes a lot of psychology theories are unproven (much like a lot of Red Pill theories) You are confusing 2 different concepts by using the same word for them. Scientific theory, (knowledge built by applying the scientific method) which you mean when talking about "psychology theory" is completely different from "theory" (ideas, hypotheses) which you mean when talking about "Red Pill theory" Also, a scientific theory is never proven. It stays valid until it's disproven.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/15 11:23 PM
-1

TRP is based on psychology like Avengers 2 is based on a true story.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/15 11:21 PM
3

If it's just a 'general trend' (whether such a trend even exists and to what degree and with what level of variation are of course without any evidence) why would it be 'inapt, self-serving and not very believable'? Probably because you don't mean 'general trend' but "AWALT!!!".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/15 11:07 PM
2

If you are referring to: These chemicals coursing through my body "making me submissive" must be weak as fuck, by the way, because they're not working. The argument in this satire is that human behavior isn't controlled by hormones even close to the extent that TRP seems to think it is. For instance, it's completely ignoring any other factors that affect behavior that could offset the effect of estrogen to be submissive (if there even was any evidence for that, the OP just linked to source which…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/15 10:17 PM
2

Do you not understand that those sources do not support your claims? For example, a source says 62% that women have rape fantasies. But your claim was not that 62% women have rape fantasies, your claim was that women are turned on by being overpowered. Do you understand that there is a difference between fantasizing about something and something actually happening to you in reality?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/15 09:53 PM
2

Btw what you described is actually a pretty good description of pseudoscience, the arch-enemy of science.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/15 08:14 PM
2

I'm not having a meta-argument with you, life's too short And I am not having argument with someone who has no idea what the words they use mean. Like you could have googled but still you trusted your ignorance more? That's hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/15 07:48 PM
4

Ratings are subjective Then your comment makes no sense, how are you not seeing that? Because ratings are subjective then "that's a 4 fucking a 6" is just as valid as "no way dude that's a 6 fucking a 3". So you can't say this will make a 4 woman think she is a 6 because it is just as valid to say that this will make a 6 woman think she is a 3.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/15 07:47 PM
0

You are assuming that such a thing as "4" or a "6" even exists. But they don't. That's just your rating of the people. How would those numbers be determined? Look at any looks rating thread here, there is never anything resembling a consensus. And they use pictures to rate, where 90% of the attractiveness depends on how the photo is prepared and taken.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/15 07:34 PM
2

Can you tell me in your own words what you think 'scientific' means?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/15 07:16 PM
1

BP method: what she tells you. RP method: assume she is lying and make up a number that makes you feel less insecure
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/15 05:38 PM
2

CuttleFishGame - This eBook teaches you all the secrets you need to attract women of your dreams. Based on sexual strategy proven in the animal kingdom. Get a copy now before we run out! Reminds me of a comment in red pill where someone said to kill the children of a single mother to make her horny (lions do this). Poe's law though.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/15 03:49 PM
1

RPW side bar says that RPW agrees with red pill's description of female nature. That includes: Women need men more than men need women Women are depreciating assets Women rely on men to be emotionally stoic [W]omen need men for their logical minds and stoic consistency Women are irrational and inconsistent To say that red pill doesn't describe women as inferior is just denying the concept altogether, basically saying that no matter what "I am not inferior because such a concept doesn't exist".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/15 03:13 PM
5

That is the mainstream definition... literally the first sentence on wikipedia: Feminism is a range of movements and ideologies that share a common goal: to define, establish, and achieve equal political, economic, cultural, personal, and social rights for women. Just curious, where the hell do you get your "mainstream" definitions from?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/15 01:20 PM
5

And completely different sexual behavior happens in other species, why cherry-pick certain species over others?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/15 12:49 PM
6

Because that's really causing serious physical harm to women everywhere. psychological harm doesn't real Which has been debunked numerous times. just like evolution has been debunked numerous times, by cranks of course You mean the phrase that originated from the idea that men being raped in prison was just part of the rehabilitation process and should be expected/normalized? (See Rape Culture 1975 documentary for coining the phrase) cool story but words and phrases are just identifiers for conc…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/15 11:43 AM
6

A spider = animal A human = animal therefore spider = human
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/15 11:25 AM
13

The conclusion that 10% of men are having 80% of the sex is not supported or even hinted by this study, that is entirely made up in your head. At best the study supports conclusions like "80% of men put bad pictures on OkCupid". I didn't look up the "study" though, what are the conclusions that the "researchers" provide?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/15 11:14 AM
1

So what exactly is your argument? That a movement's principles are x but all of its members actually fight for not x?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/15 10:26 AM
9

Do you mean those movements are principled on virgin shaming or that there are people who virgin shame but also identify themselves as members of the movement? Do you also realize that red pill is principled on traditional gender roles, it's not just some people there that think that way?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/15 10:05 AM
12

Virgin shaming, slut shaming, and all gender double standards come from the traditional gender roles that redpill not only does nothing about but is actually actively reinforcing. Do you know who is working against traditional gender standards and roles? Then you know who is working against virgin shaming.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/15 08:51 AM
1

If "making more" means the other will have no financial responsibility that means 24% of the time men have no financial responsibility. And this number is raising rapidly, it was only 6% in 1960.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 01:00 PM
1

And from that you conclude, that the woman has no financial responsibilities? That's your synthesis, not supported by the source you cited.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 11:11 AM
1

Please cite secondary sources that are published in a peer-reviewed journal that back up your claims.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 10:12 AM
1

What main question? Do you realize the difference between what text you have written and what is in your head? So the wife isn't responsible or accountable for anything in the marriage? She is responsible and accountable for exactly the same things the husband is. These responsibilities are covered in law.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 09:47 AM
1

No I said you are not entitled to have sex with your spouse, not that it's not a huge part of marriage. If a guy marries because he thinks it entitles him to sex he needs to update his knowledge of the law.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 09:35 AM
1

People who don't view RP as rape manual are already RP as fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 12:08 AM
2

No just checking that blackpill meant what I thought it meant.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 08:43 PM
2

That's still basically way too high to blame your virginity on it
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 08:36 PM
2

How would you rate your looks on a scale of 1-10?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 08:23 PM
2

As far as I can tell, blackpill is even more extreme reality denial than TRP then?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 08:16 PM
4

If all I get from marriage is some sort of right to financial support from a wife, of what benefit is that to me when I can support myself? And what if you suddenly can't? For example what if your boss finds out you are a red piller and get fired? (j/k, do you even work bro?) Do you in general live in some kind of fantasy world where you are completely ignorant of the fact that your future is not 100% guaranteed? Then there is (this list is not exhaustive): Marital tax deduction Joint tax return…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 08:04 PM
4

That doesn't make any sense, those benefits are exclusive to marriage (as opposed to unofficial relationship or lesser forms of officially recognized relationships). A man cannot provide those benefits on his own no matter what. If a man wants to immigrate or emigrate, that can be done without marriage. Marriage simply isn't necessary. You completely misunderstood. I meant that if you are not married then your SO will not be officially recognized and the whole process is harder because she is ba…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 07:51 PM
5

The legal and financial benefits of marriage have great value to a man. Financial and immigration benefits of marriage are great value to a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 07:45 PM
3

a man can and should support himself So can and should a woman, it's not 18th century. Legal benefits are of no value to a man That's just. what. I don't even.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 07:41 PM
1

The benefits are the financial and legal benefits I just told you about.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 07:35 PM
3

You probably need to talk to a lawyer to get an exact idea about what one is entitled to in a marriage. All I know is that no developed country has a law that entitles one spouse to have sex with another. If by support you mean financial support, I believe in many countries there are laws that entitle a spouse to get financial support from another. Then why should a man marry? Exact details depend on the country but typically you get a lot of practical benefits regarding finances and official re…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 07:26 PM
4

That's an easy one. How about no?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 07:15 PM
3

Nobody, so nobody is in breach of any contracts.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 07:13 PM
1

she is in breach of the marital contract LOL there is no such thing as a marital contract where the other party agrees to be a human sex toy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 07:09 PM
0

Saying that marriage has no meaning now because raping your spouse is illegal directly implies "men should be able to rape their wives". Can you hamster about these? http://i.imgur.com/WZf2fyU.jpg http://i.imgur.com/8aoPYSi.png http://i.imgur.com/jrzEdpD.png http://i.imgur.com/9fTqYzk.png http://i.imgur.com/I64RwW9.png http://i.imgur.com/lQq3BL0.jpg http://i.imgur.com/Ti0X6Yh.jpg http://i.imgur.com/dS2DpEp.jpg http://i.imgur.com/l3Ijaj3.jpg http://i.imgur.com/0EJxoNY.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 04:27 PM
0

...and then in the same breath says that marriage has no meaning if you cannot rape your spouse. You are one of those people who think saying "I am not racist but [insert racism]" makes you not racist?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 04:20 PM
0

For instance: http://i.imgur.com/7Vr2QaE.png. From the head moderator, no less.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 04:02 PM
-1

Examples: http://imgur.com/a/bGiiW https://imgur.com/a/nrSCv http://imgur.com/a/SLSyy http://imgur.com/a/ms9c6 https://archive.today/T84oN https://archive.today/m2RDR Note that these examples are not some exceptions but heavily upvoted without controversy and made by endorsed trp contributors, that means the community endorses them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 02:42 PM
-1

Just to be clear - you accept that everyone else, when made aware of it, will very likely think that red pill is a rape manual (or equivalent) and now you are asking why it matters?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 02:22 PM
0

But you are. Why would you resort to bullshit JAQ attacks?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 02:16 PM
-1

Why would I ? How else do you know what non-redpill people think?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 02:10 PM
-3

Yes, not everyone. Just Amazon, Kickstarter (don't you hate it when companies are run by delusional people), Asheville community and lots of women who have had contact with red pillers. Please show red pill to your mother, sisters, co-workers, boss etc and see what they say. Everyone around you will be shown to be delusional. Remember, it's not you, it's them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 01:22 PM
-6

It's not just me, pretty much rest of the entire world views TRP as a rape manual when made aware of it. So rest of the world is delusional. Now what?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 11:42 AM
-7

Are you asking how rape manual implies rape?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 11:30 AM
-3

You seem to be at the very least a purple pill if not a clever trp troll. Blue pill does not think that abuse and harassment are 'not that bad' and definitely doesn't think that rape merely has a potential to harm people.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 10:15 AM
1

You are one of those people who think saying 'I am not racist but...' makes you not racist, aren't you?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 10:00 AM
-6

Lol as long as it's not happening to you? So as long as it's someone else getting raped or abused or at the very least harassed, it doesn't concern you? Wtf am I reading? Oh and you are comparing getting killed to getting laughed at? That's psychopathy level of fucked up.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 09:53 AM
0

Lol. Do you have specific examples? It doesn't make me ignorant if I don't believe your outrageous claims that you simply just assert as if it was so (this isn't red pill)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 09:18 AM
3

TBP is there to make fun of red pill which is supposedly some magical secret that makes guys more attractive to women. Pointing out that it obviously isnt so is one of the most effective ways to make fun of it. It also causes denial mechanisms creating even more stuff to make fun of. Outside that context, I really doubt that TBP is insulting virgins like you claim. If you have defined something as what only a man does then why do you ask if it's masculine?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 01:41 AM
-3

What does sexual success mean? Sounds like a pretty fucked up way of thinking. I know you are a virgin and this is hard to believe but I assure you putting PIV doesn't mean anything and is not something to strive for to the extent that calling it a success is warranted. Do you have success in brushing your teeth or taking a piss?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 01:24 AM
1

True thats pretty shameful
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 01:08 AM
5

When you judge people by their gender rather than as individuals, that shows internalized sexist thought patterns. Also saying manly man is not helping. 'manning up' Is also considered sexist, since it reinforces that masculine means brave (good) and feminine means cowardly (bad).
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 01:00 AM
-1

Yes those comments can be reported as they appear.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 12:22 AM
0

I dont think that was satire comment, the TBP sub is not free of bigotry and you will occasionally see legitimately sexist, racist etc comments there despite the irony (commiting a form of bigotry while mocking another form).
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 12:16 AM
1

Why would you think he is a feminist (rhetorical question, I know it's because you don't know the meaning of the word)? He is showing a blatantly sexist attitude, something very unfeminist indeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 12:04 AM
1

So all men are just supposed to read women's minds when they ask them out, or else they're creeps? What the hell? This is pretty revealing. You actually think you need to read someone's mind to be able to tell if they're attracted to you? If you are into "self-improvement" that is definitely an area where you need to work on a lot. And before you talk about "continuing advances", we've already established that this was in no way implied in any of my posts, so I have no idea why you would assume …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/15 01:07 PM
1

We were talking about men who merely approach/flirt with women generally, and you've somehow decided they are all creeps They are if there is no attraction. Being told to fuck off is not the only sign of there not being any attraction, in fact it's probably the result of ignoring multiple lack of attraction signs. They give you a much larger supply of options to choose from, options that men don't have Men can have a large supply of people they are not attracted to approaching them as well. Seco…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/15 12:38 PM
1

I just explained you what a creep is because you were ignorant about it. And now you are back at starting point. Adavances from someone you are not attracted to do not make it any easier to have sex or relationship. I brought up homosexuality because of the blatant double standard where you expect women to have sex and relationships with people they are not attracted to but don't expect the same from men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/15 12:28 PM
1

Apparently every guy women don't like is a creep Almost getting there. You also need to make sexual advances despite lack of attraction to be a creep. Just like a straight guy would consider a gay guy continuing advances even after telling them they are straight.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/15 12:12 PM
1

There is no effective difference. The flaw in your comparison is that you don't obviously consider the woman in your example impossible the same way a straight guy would consider it impossible to be with another guy or a woman would consider it impossible to be with a creep. It works like zero multiplication. 0 0 = 0. But also 100 0 = 0. Exactly the same result.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/15 12:04 PM
0

An easier time to getting gay sex and relationships, yes. Obviously the assumption in the thought exercise is that you are not gay, which means there is not any difference in the easiness of getting sex and relationships - the difficulty level will stay firmly at 'impossible'. Think you can disconnect from your homosexuality just for the duration of the thought exercise?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/15 11:53 AM
1

I didn't comment about whether threatening to leave relationship is abuse or not at all. The fact that the source is scoped to man-to-woman abuse doesn't make it wrong, that's just simply illogical. The entire point was to show how a woman might not just be "free to leave" despite unreasonable relationship "terms" in man-to-woman abusive relationships. I am not saying you are abusive at all but at worst it makes you sound abusive when you say that she would be free to leave. At best it makes you…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/15 12:24 PM
1

I just think too high income inequality makes it harder to have a relationship of equals. Like if one makes $25k and the other makes $150k, it's just hard to imagine that not causing any problems. But I personally have no experience of relationships with such a high income inequality.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/15 10:29 AM
1

As a guy I would definitely prefer same level of education and similar income. I would not even compromise on the education.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/15 10:12 AM
1

I agree women are harassed way more. That is not the same thing as having it easy, quite the opposite. Imagine if every gay guy (something you are not attracted to in the same way women are not attracted to creeps) started offering you sex. Would you now think you have easier time getting sex and relationships? Now leave your house and start building beliefs that are based on reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/15 09:32 AM
-1

I really doubt you have ever left your house
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/15 02:01 AM
1

You really have a weird idea of what goes into getting an advanced degree. I assure you there is no work devoted to improving your banter.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/15 12:15 AM
0

What is so crap? IMO it all depends on how much she makes. If she makes at least around $100K as well, then the requirement for $100K is reasonable. I assume some of the other stuff is blown out of proportion by the OP's red pill delusions.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/15 10:58 PM
5

A lot women seem to think that having this stuff makes them more attractive for some odd reason. What makes you think women think that?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/15 10:45 PM
2

Except that non-alphas are not getting fucked very much, by definition. At best that means women not into alphas are lower sex drive and/or are less promiscuous. Note that this whole argument is being made in a complete TRP fantasy land frame which is the only place where the concepts of alpha and beta male exist in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/15 09:53 PM
2

Well given that they are not into alphas, they would be fucking non-alphas.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/15 09:28 PM
1

I obviously meant fuckable women. Let me make it clear now: An alpha being able to "easily fuck fuckable women" does not tell you anything about fuckable women's preference of alphas in general. For instance, a small portion of fuckable women could be into alphas and fucking them and it would be true that alphas can now "easily fuck fuckable women" but it would also be true that most fuckable women are not into alphas. You need to prove that this is not the case. (You could be unconsciously assu…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/15 09:19 PM
2

So now you're saying a women isn't fuckable if she isn't into alphas. That doesn't make any sense at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/15 09:04 PM
1

She is free to leave if she does not like the terms of the relationship(and so am I). I'll probably regret assuming that you are simply just ignorant and uneducated about this. Here's lots of other reasons people stay in abusive relationships despite the abuse. One can physically beat their SO every day and he or she will not end the relationship despite obviously not "liking the terms". So saying "she is free to leave" is just plain wrong and doesn't mean you are not being abusive at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/15 08:46 PM
1

I frequently see TRP posters saying that what women say they want and what they really want are very different Well the exception is of course when women appear to be saying something vaguely confirming a TRP idea when the speaker and the TRP interpreter have completely different definitions for words.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/15 08:15 PM
2

You think this is something that changed over the past 20 years? Yea people just stopped doing science 28 years ago. You are completely missing the point. Besides it's a primary source of one study and doesn't define "dominance" as anything like TRP would define it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/15 07:57 PM
3

An alpha being able to "easily fuck women" does not tell you anything about women's preference of alphas in general. For instance, a small portion of women could be into alphas and fucking them and it would be true that alphas can now "easily fuck women" but it would also be true that most women are not into alphas. You need to prove that this is not the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/15 07:40 PM
3

So you have no idea what abuse is yet you are sure you are not being abusive? Nice case of being too stupid to know how stupid you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/15 03:24 PM
1

No I don't agree, that's pretty fucked up if you really think that.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/15 03:08 PM
1

For instance the fact that people who would not get a mental illness diagnosis if subjected to evaluation universally agree with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/15 01:49 PM
1

Since we are just going in a circle. And I think most people would kill someone if it would somehow benefit them and they knew they were unlikely to get caught. Lol. What the fuck?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/15 01:44 PM
1

So you don't understand what the words "entirely subjective" mean? Why would "entirely subjective" mean "based somewhat on biology but otherwise on preferences"? It means whatever you want it to mean that's what makes it entirely subjective I.E. arbitrary.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/15 01:39 PM
0

I am not asking about other people I am asking you. I thought you were agreeing with me that entirely subjective morals don't make sense (which they don't). And if you don't agree with entirely subject morals, you must think that there are some objective morals. However, if you don't agree about murder (the kind I just described, not the exceptions) being objectively immoral, what would be the things that you agree are objectively immoral then?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/15 01:27 PM
0

So you don't agree that cold-blooded premeditated flat out plain murder is objectively immoral and that anyone can just subjectively decide for themselves if it's right?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/15 01:08 PM
-1

If you agree that murder is objectively immoral then you agree that men are objectively less moral since men commit way more murders. But this isn't useful since you cannot judge an individual just by the demographic they belong to.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/15 12:58 PM
-1

Because entirely subjective and entirely objective are the only possible choices? So if I point out how entirely subjective morals doesn't make sense then I must be advocating for entirely objective morals? No other possibility?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/15 12:26 PM
-4

Entirely subjective morality is impossible. If you can just arbitrarily decide your morals as it suits you it is not different from not having any concept of morality at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/15 10:16 AM
1

Purple is just a balance fallacy and without flairs it would be impossible to tell the difference between red and purple posters.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/15 10:19 PM
2

Please continue in the belief that there is no real knowledge about social dynamics and that you are therefore justified in believing some arbitrary bullshit originally made up to sell ebooks to desperate misogynist virgins.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/15 08:28 PM
3

Well if social dynamics were scientifically testable, there'd be a lot less room for debate. You mean like sociology and psychology? Oh right, they utterly destroy any validity of RP so they cannot be real science. And they are mainstream but Real Truth can only be discovered by a group of conspiracy nuts.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/15 10:24 AM
0

Except that "AWALT" is a fundamental assumption of red pill. Without this assumption (or if this assumption is false) literally none of red pill makes sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/15 10:07 AM
3

Video games etc are not the same as human beings (why am I not surprised I need to tell this to a RP apologist?). Video games are products that are sold. The rating system on them is supposed to create more sales by giving an illusion of accurate judgement.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/15 09:08 AM
2

Beyond "exceptionally ugly", "average" and "exceptionally good looking" it's just subjective and pointless.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/15 08:50 AM
1

You are taking 'wont fuck right away' to mean 'won't fuck ever' and don't even seem to notice it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/15 10:53 PM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_fallacy
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/15 02:36 PM
2

real science is too beta
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/15 08:45 AM
3

A moderator forced my "true colors" on me so I suppose I can reveal that yes it's supposed to be a parody.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/15 08:43 AM
5

You are sayimg radical feminism but you left out "radical" in the OP. Radical feminism is as related to feminism as carpet is to a car.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/15 03:59 PM
3

Wow there seems to be many flaws with this non-existing concept that you have mislabeled as feminism. If only you could find real people actually subscribing to these strawman ideas you would surely have an interesting and fruitful debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/15 03:46 PM
4

At TRP we are not concerned with the traditional and outdated concept of 'evidence'. We have completely eliminated the unnecessary concepts that traditional science burdens itself with. We only concern ourselves with observation and hypothesizing. When forming a hypothesis we are extra careful to make it untestable (in the traditional scientific sense) and impossible to falsify. This not only makes the hypothesis inherently strong and stable, it also eliminates the need for laborious and tedious…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/15 12:32 PM
1

It's not really pedantry. Besides here are some things you can try to disprove that there is no absolutes: Try jumping from the top of a, say, 500m tall building. You are guaranteed to die. Try obstructing your breathing until you die. You are guaranteed to die. Try having your friend chop your head off. You are guaranteed to die. Try living long enough. You are guaranteed to die.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/15 11:26 PM
1

Because dealing in absolutes will always end with you being wrong. This statement itself is dealing in absolutes, so it's refuting itself. Because nothing is absolute. Making the absolute statement that nothing is absolute refutes itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/15 09:05 PM
2

TRP does this with women If your out group is women then you are by definition a misogynist. while TBP does this with TRPers Given the above this means TBP is anti-misogyny.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/15 01:52 PM
2

Come down with the flu. Drink your own pee every day for 7 days. Are you cured? Then drinking your own pee cures the flu. If not, you did it wrong and you should repeat the experiment.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/15 12:56 PM
2

First you have to proof that rp hierarchy is flawed. "rp hierarchy" is asserted without evidence therefore it can be dismissed without evidence
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/15 12:43 PM
2

I'll use [a] television show ... as one example for the argument I'm about to present. I think you already revealed the most obvious reason for the mockery
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/15 11:59 AM
2

It's not a personal attack but an objective and accurate description based on overwhelming empirical evidence
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/15 11:23 AM
3

Except that the majority of society is composed of women. So then, in a democracy the majority will make the rules and that's women. If you are talking about the US, the "rules" are made by the congress which is 80% male. And then there's also the constitution which puts some limits on the rules you can make. Even if not, most if not all developed nations are constitutional and representative so there is no tyranny of the majority of the society directly.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/15 01:35 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter