~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Marriage is just a way to give women a sense of security by holding a man’s assets at gunpoint.But for answer number one, many women are willing to have sex and get with pregnant with a man without first demanding marriage as long as he is sufficiently attractive…in fact, since it’s the modern era, when modern women get married, their husband isn’t the first partner they’ve had, which means that he has to provide so many guarantees and conditions for something that someone else got for free… The likely truth is that she would rather marry the one that she’s actually attracted to, but she … | /r/MensRights | 05/10/25 11:35 PM |
| 46 | Marriage is just a way to give women a sense of security by holding a man’s assets at gunpoint.Fear of losing assets, plus fear of having to truly admit that not only is his wife not into him, but likely that he will go a long time without another woman unless he commits by offering assets with the state as an enforcer again…and having to admit that he’s not attractive enough to actually be treated well | /r/MensRights | 05/10/25 11:30 PM |
| 35 | Marriage is just a way to give women a sense of security by holding a man’s assets at gunpoint.Right? And the funny thing is the more he compromises, the more he unattractive he becomes to the woman (not like it mattered much in the first place since he lacked the looks or status or “dominance” to be sufficiently attractive to her in the first place)… All this conforming for far more headaches than what the men she was attracted to got to have in her PRIME YEARS (those men don’t have to hear complaints about toilets seats, or not doing certain chores a specific way, and actually got roman… | /r/MensRights | 05/10/25 11:16 PM |
| 38 | Why do so many men have “male feminist” vibes?And I’m guessing that one of those types downvoted my post. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/25 02:34 PM |
| 12 | If countries were truly misogynistic, there’d be a bachelorette tax.Men are conscripted with the logic of defending the country. Society says that we can’t conscript women because they’re not as strong, and historically society’s didn’t draft women because they were seen as necessary for maintaining the population through birth. However, no one in the modern world is forcing women to have babies by law or applying a bachelorette tax that only applies to women to equalize male conscription. So there’s a system that effectively tells men that they have legal oblig… | /r/MensRights | 12/02/25 07:22 PM |
| 29 | Onlyfans relies more on male loneliness then it does male lustBecause if they did such things, women would do every thing in their power to tear it down… | /r/MensRights | 07/01/25 12:44 AM |
| 5 | Onlyfans relies more on male loneliness then it does male lustA lengthy and empathetic education campaign is the only answer. The mainstream won’t do it, because the top men benefit from neutered competition and women benefit from this, and many men are all too happy to kick other men down just to feel a sense of superiority. So it’s going to require someone who’s both aware of the problem and willing to be empathetic…it would be better if the educator were already a celebrity… | /r/MensRights | 07/01/25 12:37 AM |
| 7 | Onlyfans relies more on male loneliness then it does male lustThe men getting into this aren’t exactly stupid in the cognitive sense, (if it was just lust, they’ve seen free porn before) they’re just socially and biologically conditioned to be so desperate for female validation that they’re no longer capable of seeing a trap for what it is. It’s no different from a starving person seeing an oddly colored water bottle in a desert. Their brain just sees “water” and starts lapping it up without even considering if it’s poisonous. Evolutionarily, desperation m… | /r/MensRights | 07/01/25 12:35 AM |
| 21 | Onlyfans relies more on male loneliness then it does male lustWasn’t there a Japanese woman named Mai Watanabe (not an OF girl, but similar mindset) that extracted millions from men and specifically target men who were lonely, were only valued at work like a cog, basically any man who would be emotionally compromised? She specifically made a guide to other women seeking to extract money in the same way to avoid men with loving families, friends, or fulfilling social hobbies. These women know what they’re doing. | /r/MensRights | 07/01/25 12:29 AM |
| 4 | Onlyfans relies more on male loneliness then it does male lustGood on you for admitting that it’s a problem; it’s basically a digital drug. It’s easier to fall into this trap because when men shame other men for this (as people shame those with drug addictions) it paradoxically makes them more addicted to their drug because they now need it to cope with the negative emotional backlash of society. (“I can only turn to weed/“only she can provide me hope”) | /r/MensRights | 07/01/25 12:27 AM |
| 22 | Onlyfans relies more on male loneliness then it does male lustNo doubt, from men in dead beadrooms | /r/MensRights | 07/01/25 12:24 AM |
| 7 | Only fans girls be likeIt’s not just lust (these men know porn is out there) It’s lust+loneliness…all humans get lonely, but with men who are often more lonely because of society’s disregard for them, combined with their own sex drive, it creates a unique problem. When these men see women creating an illusion of being personally sexual for them (which porn doesn’t do), the loneliness stops his brain from being logical about it….as another commenter said, it’s a sad situation | /r/MensRights | 31/07/24 12:31 PM |
| 31 | Korean men resist feminism because conscription breeds male solidarity.See, while what you’re saying makes sense on the surface, you’re forgetting that simp shaming already exists. But when people are shamed for their vices, they don’t stop doing the vice, they just go somewhere they can’t be shamed (think of drug addicts.) You won’t see many men openly simping for women in public, but they have no issues liking Instagram photos, agreeing with feminist propaganda, and buying OnlyFans subscriptions. Shaming only serves to boost our own sense of superiority over thes… | /r/MensRights | 14/05/24 10:41 PM |
| 1 | Why are men who don’t commit to women “immoral”, but not women who use men for free food and attention?!Not saying I like it, I’m just saying that I can understand how easy it is to not care about others’ feelings when money, meals, and free attention are the reward for not caring. | /r/MensRights | 24/04/24 10:16 AM |
| 2 | 'Sugar Baby Riri' gets nine-year prison term over romance scamWhile I’m not completely happy either (prosecutors wanted 13 years) it’s hopefully at least enough that she’s not youthful enough to pull this trick again. Don’t know why the other replier had to be harsh, though. | /r/MensRights | 24/04/24 09:59 AM |
| 2 | 'Sugar Baby Riri' gets nine-year prison term over romance scamIf this were the West, she’d be called a girlboss and get no consequences. If men exploit loneliness they’re scum, when women do it, the men should have “known better.” (People don’t understand how emotionally compromised lonely people are; it’s the same desperation that leads people to drink visibly dirt water.) I’m not sure that 9 years is enough (the prosecutors wanted 13), but hopefully, it’s enough that when she gets out, she won’t look young enough to pull this trick again. | /r/MensRights | 24/04/24 09:55 AM |
| 6 | Why are men who don’t commit to women “immoral”, but not women who use men for free food and attention?!Maybe I should have been a bit more clear in my post, apologies if it wasn’t already. Typically, in dating, a man is looking for sex/a romantic relationship, and a woman is looking for exclusivity/marriage. There are men and women out there that have no intention of providing these things to the other, but see no problem with letting the other believe they might get these things so that they can keep having casual sex with no commitment (if male) or free food/emotional support (if female). This … | /r/MensRights | 23/04/24 08:45 PM |
| 12 | What real leverage does a guy have in modern relationships?This is exactly why I think men shouldn’t marry. It’s exhausting to do that 24/7, and she’d still leave if she though there were some guy better | /r/MensRights | 23/04/24 06:20 PM |
| 21 | Why are men who don’t commit to women “immoral”, but not women who use men for free food and attention?!That is certainly true (well half-true, because the gynocentrism that they support has noticeable effects on our lives: drafts depending on your country, circumcision, social assistance disparity, the general empathy gap). My specific point, at least in this scenario, is that if we let women take advantage of men, then they shouldn’t complain (nor should white knights, WHO THEMSELVES GET TAKEN ADVANTAGE OF rush to their defense) when the top tier men they want do the same thing to them that they… | /r/MensRights | 23/04/24 05:59 PM |
| 7 | Why do white knights throw men under the bus?!The point is that it NEVER works. Wooing/courting is just simping by another name, unfortunately. Most women, especially in the west, only care about three things. Looks (and you have to be at least an 8/10 to have a chance; dating apps prove that they’re far more selective than men), social status (high prestige jobs or celebrity), and a domineering, charismatic personality; you must have 2 of the 3. Otherwise, you’ll be no different from the many others “courting” her with dates which just end… | /r/MensRights | 07/03/24 03:50 AM |
| 58 | Why do white knights throw men under the bus?!EXACTLY. Women hate men that risk their lives for them without her “earning” it. It shows that a guy is willing to devalue himself for her sake, which just seems desperate. Women aren’t exactly stupid, they know that these guys don’t defend other guys. It’s not much different than simps who spend all their money on a girl that isn’t their girlfriend, or having other signs of commitment (a child, domestic cohabitation/help, etc.) Like if you’re already willing to put yourself in danger for her as… | /r/MensRights | 06/03/24 08:28 PM |
| 48 | The most exhaustive incel study to date, releases its findings...“Just be White” | /r/MensRights | 04/03/24 01:42 PM |
| 15 | The OF simp phenomenon is the same social evil as gambling addictions. And our society doesn’t see it that way.Mutually beneficial? In a world where women use AI chatbots to send messages to the men subscribed to them? Don’t mistake it, the men aren’t getting anything more than what they would get from an AI girlfriend. And even in the case of the others, consider this. What a simp gets, is insincere attention that will never blossom into anything he actually wants, and what the woman gets in return is actual money that can be used to better her life. The simp gets stuck in a desperate fantasy, and these… | /r/MensRights | 14/01/24 11:23 PM |
| 2 | People who mock lonely men are absolutely distasteful.Men’s rights supporters are shamed in person all the time. Many already fear ostracism. The ones who aren’t already brainwashed into self-loathing don’t do it because they even understand what they’re hating on (thanks to feminist propaganda), they simply hate themselves and “men’s rights” things because greater society shamed them against those things. The ones who are educated enough against the propaganda don’t feel shame, they feel resentment that they fear expressing, but it doesn’t change … | /r/MensRights | 17/12/23 01:03 AM |
| 2 | People who mock lonely men are absolutely distasteful.I wasn’t being literal; I just used those as the most stereotypical examples that society typically mocks | /r/MensRights | 17/12/23 12:21 AM |
| 3 | People who mock lonely men are absolutely distasteful.Popularity doesn’t determine inherent rightness (see feminist ideology) nor does unpopularity and shaming serve as an impetus to determine wrongness (see the members of this very sub). Many of us here face would face a lot of backlash in real life if we expressed the ways men are backlashed. Heck, we would be shamed just for having emotions. Does that make our experience inherently wrong? No, rather it just pushes us to find spaces that accept our views. A simp is likewise not going to be change… | /r/MensRights | 17/12/23 12:21 AM |
| 7 | People who mock lonely men are absolutely distasteful.My post generally doesn’t apply to myself. But if you’re talking about other men, I just explained why it’s not that simple for them. Even within those domains that you mentioned, male “friendships” can often remain in a very superficial and event dependent circumstance, which doesn’t permit actual connection. Finally, the tone of your writing seems aggressive, as if you need to defend yourself…might you be one of those who like to mock the lonely? | /r/MensRights | 16/12/23 06:33 PM |
| 3 | People who mock lonely men are absolutely distasteful.Except this doesn’t work when the internet is concerned and people aren’t answerable to anyone. Anyone with ideas that are shamed in person can easily go online and be validated. For example, an atheist lives in a town where he’s shamed for his beliefs. Sure, he’s still an atheist, he simply hides in person, and then proceeds to join multiple atheist forums online. A better deterrent would be education with a dose of empathy. | /r/MensRights | 16/12/23 05:28 PM |
| 2 | People who mock lonely men are absolutely distasteful.Every exact situation is different, and the thing is that shame does nothing constructive, unless the goal is to feel superior to those men. The shamed men will just hide away or avoid spaces where they’re shamed, and ironically will end up strengthening whatever parasocial bonds they already have. | /r/MensRights | 16/12/23 05:11 PM |
| 3 | People who mock lonely men are absolutely distasteful.I’ve personally never suffered from this issue, but I have at least experienced the kind of loneliness that makes it possible to understand men who do. | /r/MensRights | 16/12/23 05:10 PM |
| 5 | People who mock lonely men are absolutely distasteful.Aren’t double standards amazing? /s | /r/MensRights | 16/12/23 05:09 PM |
| 3 | People who mock lonely men are absolutely distasteful.It’s just amazing in general how difficult it is for people to imagine mental suffering that they haven’t gone through | /r/MensRights | 16/12/23 05:07 PM |
| 3 | People who mock lonely men are absolutely distasteful.The power of a gynocentric society at work. | /r/MensRights | 16/12/23 05:07 PM |
| 19 | People who mock lonely men are absolutely distasteful.It definitely does, but I prefer not to think of them as “weaks”…from another perspective, one could find it “weak” that people even feel loneliness. We didn’t choose to be born a species whose brains punish us for not meeting social conditions. At the same time, there needs to be a way to convince the men that the parasocial relationships they’re spending into are one sided and hurt them in the long run. But as long as loneliness is a thing and companionship (platonic, sexual, even familial) is… | /r/MensRights | 16/12/23 08:00 AM |
| 21 | The specific criminalization of FGM but not MGM is proof of Western gynocentrism.I’ve seen you in other comments. Why are you obsessed with this thread? | /r/MensRights | 05/12/23 11:57 PM |
| 39 | The specific criminalization of FGM but not MGM is proof of Western gynocentrism.That link is known to contain pro-circumcision propaganda. Would you call an FGM survivor with similar emotions “obsessive”? Fuck out of here with your false sympathy, you’re only here to feel superior to us. | /r/MensRights | 05/12/23 11:32 PM |
| 2 | Japanese Men, Men's Rights In Japan - 4ma15, A Voice Synth Musician Says He Will Die And Delete All Of His Songs If He Doesn't Find A Girlfriend.I actually agree…yes, he’s in a pathetic position, but kicking him down further only serves to make ourselves feel superior, (which is natural, since men are more competitive) and it would do nothing to actually help him. Insulting people with words like “simp” tends to make them defensive and double down, which is the last thing we want, collectively. | /r/MensRights | 04/11/23 03:45 PM |
| 7 | A feminist assaulted me for using this subreddit.What could he possibly have done? If he fought back, the many white knights that outnumbered him would have beaten him up. And even if he didn’t, the fact that woman have so much social power means that she can report him and win, even if she started the fight first. | /r/MensRights | 10/10/23 05:43 AM |
| 1 | There is no male solidarity.Viewpoints like yours are precisely why I made the original post in the first place. Everything that men suffer that’s mentioned on this subreddit as a whole chiefly stems from the lack of empathy shown because of society’s absurd notion that they’re inherently disposable until proven otherwise. In that case, where does a woman’s value come from? The potential to give birth? Potential useful usefulness means nothing to society when it comes to men, so why do we afford women that empathy, especia… | /r/MensRights | 09/10/23 07:42 PM |
| 2 | There is no male solidarity.Hmm…in the sense that men are practically required to sort out their problems, I can understand this to a point. Though, a lot of the responses seem like gender-roles mixed with hyper-individualism. However, empowering as it may be to think otherwise, there are problems that people cannot solve on their own. For example, without coordination and cooperation the way that feminists have done, the status of men is doomed to worsen. Depression isn’t something people can easily get over without help.… | /r/MensRights | 09/10/23 06:38 PM |
| 1 | There is no male solidarity.But men are half of society, so I’m not easily understanding why there’s a lack of empathy even among men | /r/MensRights | 09/10/23 06:25 PM |
| 6 | There is no male solidarity.I can agree with the point you have, but I’m failing to understand what the presence of female in-group bias has with the lack of male in-group bias (or rather, solidarity). | /r/MensRights | 09/10/23 12:37 AM |
| 6 | There is no male solidarity.No need to get hostile, I apologize for my accusations; it wasn’t clear whether you were agreeing with me or criticizing me, and in cases where it’s not clear, I assume the worst since that’s what people naturally do. | /r/MensRights | 08/10/23 11:29 PM |
| 7 | There is no male solidarity.I am not espousing self-hatred, I’m simply pointing out areas where men as a group aren’t showing solidarity in ways that may harm their collective interests. | /r/MensRights | 08/10/23 11:11 PM |
| 2 | Are men becoming obsolete?Well see, until you clarified that, I didn’t know it wasn’t meant yo be an insult. Even now, it feels like you’re here to look down and insult rather than actually try to counter the point I’m making: the growing obsolescence of men. The physical proof I’m referring to is make genital mutilation, which at least proves that organ harvesting is in vogue. I suppose there will always be a demand for that; it’s only a matter of time until society decides to go father and go after vital organs. And th… | /r/MensRights | 26/04/22 04:42 AM |
| 3 | Are men becoming obsolete?I don’t necessarily have to be brainwashed, I and many other men carry physical proof of men having no value as a constant reminder. And I don’t see how insulting me about my appearance which you haven’t even see is helping your point. | /r/MensRights | 26/04/22 04:09 AM |
| 1 | Are men becoming obsolete?Fair point. The white collar thing reminds me that it’s typically the powerful that set the standards for “value” in society (though I wish the non-powerful would stop judging others on value that shouldn’t even be relevant to them specifically, it’s messing with my mind), and I suppose there doesn’t need to be value at all. Now whether society would stop punishing those who can’t live up to arbitrary, power-defined values, that’s a topic for another day… Thank you. | /r/MensRights | 26/04/22 04:04 AM |
| 2 | Are men becoming obsolete?I’m not even close to feminist, I have major issues with that ideology… But I can’t help but wonder, especially as I think about the historical function of men and women, and how the power and distinctiveness of men is vanishing in of things like economic equality (not saying this is bad) and automation. | /r/MensRights | 26/04/22 03:46 AM |
| 1 | Are men becoming obsolete?It’s true that many white collar careers are not valuable to the majority of people, but they are valuable to the few people that hold the money needed to live. And for this reason, it’s “valuable”. As long as what you are appeals to the many or appeals to the powerful, it has valuable. But if we reach a point where it’s not necessary to either (like automation), then what’s the value for men? People want 2 things: reproduce themselves, and make life easier. When automation threatens to make one… | /r/MensRights | 26/04/22 03:43 AM |
| 1 | Are men becoming obsolete?But automation can do exactly this. “Not having a skill to offer” means that whatever you might be, society doesn’t value it. Future automation can reduce construction workers to people who don’t have skills to offer. For example, if driving was very expensive to learn, it would be an even more valuable skill to learn than it is now. In a similar vein, being able to read words is not a valuable skill because nearly every adult can do it, it’s practically obsolete. To some, a VCR is valuable, but… | /r/MensRights | 26/04/22 03:40 AM |
| 1 | Are men becoming obsolete?But new things tend to make the old obsolete. In the same way that DVD players are being done away with by advances in modern computer technology, I wouldn’t want to be operated on by a doctor with outdated medical practices (such as thinking lobotomies are valid) or thinks that random animal extracts will cure certain ailments without empirical evidence. Both a doctor from an older era and one from modern times can still be called doctors, but the newer one trained in refined modern knowledge r… | /r/MensRights | 26/04/22 03:30 AM |
| 1 | Are men becoming obsolete?What kind of shop do you mean, like a sweatshop? If in time, automation happens, there’s going to be a mass amount of starvation and homeless due to people who have less options for social value | /r/MensRights | 26/04/22 03:19 AM |
| 1 | Are men becoming obsolete?Easier said than done; the moment you stop evaluating yourself on the potential value that you have to society, you will be starving and homeless. That stress internalizes and motivates one (at least myself) to think in such terms. | /r/MensRights | 26/04/22 03:14 AM |
| 1 | Are men becoming obsolete?I suppose this would be ideal, but our current world obviously doesn’t (and I’m not sure it ever can) reflect this. In our world, humans are valued for what they do, or for what they have (beauty, etc). Simply existing is not enough, and socially we prove this by punishing people (homelessness, starvation, ostracization, etc.) for not providing the things society values. The most common measurement of value is money…for example, medical workers for doing valued labor, or models for their beauty … | /r/MensRights | 26/04/22 03:02 AM |
| 1 | Is it fair for me to say that feminism is redundant in America?I was originally going to make a post that covered the Western first world, but I chose the US because I’m more knowledgeable of feminism’s effects here (I’m American) as well as bringing up anti-male problems that aren’t as strong of an issue in other countries (like MGM, though I’m aware that unfortunately, no country bans it by law even if they’re already culturally disinclined) | /r/MensRights | 07/07/21 04:36 PM |
| 3 | The fact that MGM exists is proof that our society is not “advanced”.Oh no; don’t worry about it, haha. The reason I did that was simply to make it clear that my post was being America and West-centric, because I already know that people in this country default to the “FGM is worse”. I didn’t want to seem like someone who only cared about MGM, though I suppose if I’m already on this sub, then my mentioning FGM is probably redundant... | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 02/04/21 04:46 PM |
| 0 | The fact that MGM exists is proof that our society is not “advanced”.That is true...though I pointed out that it is a major incentive. Though capitalism is certainly not responsible for MGM’s origin, I believe that it’s the strongest incentive for it continuing. Even if we somehow strip culture and religion, humans can never part with easy profit... | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 02/04/21 03:38 PM |
| 8 | The fact that MGM exists is proof that our society is not “advanced”.See apparently, the foreskin (especially those belonging to newborns) contains special cells and properties that create highly effective face creams. Because of how valuable they are, hospitals sell these foreskins to cream companies for a lot of money (though I’m not sure of how much). An article describing the industry is here And here, you can see some public figures joking about getting a “penis facial” from the foreskins of Korean boys (another country high in MGM, thanks to the American in… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 02/04/21 02:16 PM |
| 11 | We live in a patriarchy...*A patriarchy where women are legally protected from genital mutilation, while men are told to get over it. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 15/03/21 12:40 PM |
| 1 | Circumcision shouldn’t be allowed for consenting adults either.I have no clue whether your partner meant any harm or not, but this just shows how scary (and likely deliberate) ignorance is regarding our own anatomy. For all the nonsense we learn in school, not one word is given to important matters like this. Even if they did., they’d spout pro-circumcision propaganda. I’m so sorry for your loss. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/21 01:24 AM |
| 4 | Circumcision shouldn’t be allowed for consenting adults either.No more of a removal than the baby’s when his is cut without his choice. Though I will admit, my views have changed since the original post | /r/MensRights | 24/01/21 10:23 PM |
| 4 | How to get over feeling like a victim over circumcision?I asked how to get over my issues, not forgive. I said I’d be open to forgiveness if my mother was capable of expressing remorse. To be fair, given how I was treated by my parents over the years, it’s really hard whether their choice was for MY best interest, or THEIR best interest in feeling good about obeying ridiculous social norms. | /r/MensRights | 10/11/20 08:45 PM |
| 6 | How to get over feeling like a victim over circumcision?I’ve never even been to Africa. Even if this were the case, how in anyway can you declare this safe with SIDS being more common among circumcision victims (yes, victims — your refusal to see it as such is the reason this madness is able to continue to this day)? | /r/MensRights | 10/11/20 04:21 PM |
| 0 | I figured out a way to get Americans to support intactivism!So there’s absolutely no basis for it? There are no extremist groups in the US? | /r/MensRights | 18/10/20 04:41 PM |
| 1 | I figured out a way to get Americans to support intactivism!Admittedly, I made this post with ignorance to the American ways. To my understanding, the US is a racist, right wing country, and both major parties are racist (with republicans (or “conservatives”) being outward and democrats (or “liberals” )being closet racists, that, though would outwardly be against things like heavy policing of minorities, would support it if shit hit the fan to protect their privilege. These ideas were written with those stereotypes in mind. But the fact that you seemed s… | /r/MensRights | 18/10/20 11:47 AM |
| 2 | I figured out a way to get Americans to support intactivism!Fair enough. I’m against both American parties, so unfortunately, I’m only going off my (admittedly ignorant) stereotypes of them. | /r/MensRights | 18/10/20 11:35 AM |
| 2 | I figured out a way to get Americans to support intactivism!Fair enough; I apologize for my crude stereotype (I’m not in support of either party, so the stereotypes are all I have). Perhaps I should have used the term “typical ultra nationalist” rather than trying to tie any specific attribute to any party. But you still can’t deny that at the very least, all I’d have to do is paint both parties in a negative light to the other to gain support. | /r/MensRights | 18/10/20 11:30 AM |
| 4 | I figured out a way to get Americans to support intactivism!That’s why I only targeted the right with the idea | /r/MensRights | 18/10/20 12:18 AM |
| 4 | I figured out a way to get Americans to support intactivism!My apologies. I just imagined that that would work since I always imagine complaints of “Zionist Jewish globalism” from the most extreme. | /r/MensRights | 18/10/20 12:10 AM |
| 3 | I figured out a way to get Americans to support intactivism!You’re proving that at the very least, I can make up some story about how circumcision is a Democrat conspiracy and it would work, seeing how you were quick to point out the faults in my broad assumptions for the republican side, but not the other. Irrational tribalism is definitely the best appeal. | /r/MensRights | 17/10/20 09:19 PM |
| 3 | Why do many men have Stockholm Syndrome when it comes to their circumcision?Not necessarily, but I’m trying to get the ones who are specifically in denial whenever the issue is raised. These are the same types of men that would circumcise their child in the future so that they “look like [them]”. Secondly, recognizing that a problem exists is an important step in solving it. Willful ignorance allows the status quo, and if takes “men feeling bad” about a legitimate issue, it just might be worth it. | /r/MensRights | 01/10/20 11:28 AM |
| 4 | Why do many men have Stockholm Syndrome when it comes to their circumcision?That sub full of people worshipping deformed anatomy...ugh | /r/MensRights | 01/10/20 12:31 AM |
| 5 | Why do many men have Stockholm Syndrome when it comes to their circumcision?With regards to the first premise, I apologize; perhaps I should have asked “why do many circumcised men refuse to think of circumcision as an unethical issue?” Regarding the second, I’ve DEFINITELY seen men make constant excuses about their circumcised status, usually citing how better it was (that it was done before they could decide) or that there are “health benefits”. Heck, if you follow this thread long enough, I bet that you’ll see such comments eventually. | /r/MensRights | 30/09/20 11:39 PM |
| 6 | Why do many men have Stockholm Syndrome when it comes to their circumcision?And it’s this mindset that leads them to allowing their own sons to be cut. sighs I guess it was very easy to accept my circumcision because I never had a good relationship with my parents, nor am I very trusting of people, so I’m not against the idea of accepting that the for-profit medical industry and the “argumentum ad populum” mindset of my parents’ culture would allow that to happen. | /r/MensRights | 30/09/20 11:35 PM |
| 2 | Why do many men have Stockholm Syndrome when it comes to their circumcision?Why do the sides that “want to give rights” and “like what happened to me” have to be sides at all? Both can be done at the same time. | /r/MensRights | 30/09/20 08:59 PM |
| 8 | Why do many men have Stockholm Syndrome when it comes to their circumcision?Perhaps it’s understandable, but it’s because people are in denial that nothing meaningful can be done. How can we solve the problem if so many people refuse to see it as a problem? | /r/MensRights | 30/09/20 07:47 PM |
| 6 | Why do many men have Stockholm Syndrome when it comes to their circumcision?Ah, I see; it’s much simpler than I thought | /r/MensRights | 30/09/20 07:12 PM |
| 4 | Why do many men have Stockholm Syndrome when it comes to their circumcision?Cognitive dissonance of what exactly? (I genuinely am not sure)...is it the possibility of “man being the master of everything that happens in his life” being a lie that they’re trying to avoid? | /r/MensRights | 30/09/20 07:08 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter