TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

EternalArchon Archive

View 0 posts and 49 comments by EternalArchon on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
19

The quotes don't really even do it justice. The way she flippantly describes sending people to dungeons for thought crimes is so disturbing.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 03:16 AM
4

NY isn't Cleavland, but here just behind the Correctional Officer union, the teacher's union is by far the most powerful political organization in the state. They basically own and run the democratic party here. They hand picked the NYC mayor for his anti voucher views. They got guaranteed pensions written into the state's constitution and are exempt from both personal social security tax and employer tax, which is about 30% less in taxes.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 04:02 PM
19

That being said, while the government guy was right to argue how dangerous that station was, he was arguably still wrong to handle it the way Which makes it quite a layered and intelligent criticism on government intervention. You'd be surprised how often an in depth analysis of the costs and benefits result in this outcome
/r/MensRights19/07/16 03:50 PM
98

Well the people she sued had to pay a ton of money in legal fees and had their name dragged through the mud. Companies will now be extra careful when firing women. It also means, however, they might be worried about hiring them too
/r/MensRights31/03/15 12:31 AM
2

the Steubenville rape case), his argument was “Well, she shouldn’t have been drinking so much.” Holy shit this is so fake
/r/MensRights25/01/15 07:48 PM
8

The response will be A) a series of insults- you hate the poor, old, the young, black, brown, and green people B) taking words out of context - "Hey this guy is proud that white people were good at slavery!"
/r/MensRights10/12/14 02:20 AM
1

if you're not subscribed to /r/TumblrInAction/ do so now It's not at all about "pushing back" as much as putting a comedic spotlight on the utter idiocy. I crack up reading it so often.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 01:19 AM
44

The term I like for this is "Neo-Victorian"
/r/MensRights18/06/13 02:37 PM
5

while feminism claims to have worked very hard to dismantle all of these individual and society-wide assumptions about men and women, if you scratch the surface of their ideologies and their efforts, what you find is all of those assumptions human societies have always held, dialled up to 11. I think this is a very good summation of GWW's work, and in fact, her whole brand of anti-feminism and what separates it so astronomically from the knee-jerk 'Traditionalist' camp. Feminism is the monster t…
/r/MensRights29/04/13 08:10 PM
1

This is insane because even if Group A has more power than Group B, power is the LEAST equally distributed and time constant attribute in the whole world. Even if its sexism plus power.. well a woman can be sexist, and a woman can have vastly more power than a man. That definition not applying to a woman only makes sense if one is an extreme collectivist and can't see people as individuals. And with gender, you're basically grouping BILLIONS of people through out different societies, ages, finan…
/r/MensRights26/04/13 05:11 PM
2

I can understand focusing on systems or institutions, but at a certain point this becomes collectivist to an extreme where sympathy for an individual(and his or her injustice) vanishes.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 04:54 PM
6

If misandry doesn't exist, that means there isn't ONE PERSON in the WHOLE WORLD who hates men. How insane do you have to be to believe that?
/r/MensRights26/04/13 03:19 PM
1

if they break that trust I am in no way to blame Again, you keep hearing blame where none is put forth. Telling people to be careful of how, when, where, and with whom they drink is not blaming. You suggest it may be an ineffective piece of advice, but if so, that wouldn't be blame, that would be bad/stupid advice. Redefining all good or bad advice as "blame" is a mentality of immaturity. Prosecuting the victim, as is done in some Muslim countries, that is blaming the victim. Or saying the victi…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 07:41 PM
3

I'm not saying we should blame victims, I'm saying encouraging good behavior isn't victim blaming. There is no other crime in the world where reasonable suggestions to avoid that crime will get you called a 'that-crime' apologist/supporter. The Thailand analogy fails because there was no major aprori knowledge. The individuals made 100% rational choices before hand. A better analogy would be an arsonist setting fire to a building, and a Jane Doe inside being passed out drunk and therefore burnin…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 06:53 PM
4

And they don't see how self-destructive this is. By conflating serious issues with lesser issues, they are assuming people will take the lesser issues more seriously. However, the reverse is just as likely. They want to broaden the focus of concern, but don't understand this can dilute it. Reminds me of the anti-pot education. When you equate pot with heroin or crack, you get some people turning away from pot because of the fear-mongering. However, you get some people who see pot as a mild drug …
/r/MensRights24/04/13 05:47 PM
6

"what were you wearing" "how much did you drink" One of those questions is stupid and the other is completely legitimate. People who drink too much are easy targets and more likely to be victimized in almost every way possible: raped, robbed, murdered, etc. Now saying, "you were drunk, so its totally your fault" is crazy talk. However, "if you weren't drunk, this wouldn't have happened" is a true statement in many cases(of course not all). Someone robbing a house is the one morally responsible f…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 04:34 PM
6

Okay, that makes more sense
/r/MensRights24/04/13 02:31 AM
10

If I read this right, she seems bothered by the FEMALES, not the males. Jealous/creepy looks from frumpy office chicks who "want a cookie", but don't have her, er... elegant figure.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 01:37 AM
0

Especially when they go bonkers over a guy like Farrell. That guy's like a nicer version of Mr. Rodgers Anyone who hears the hatred spewed over that guy and then hear him speak for 5 mins can see the truth.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 02:33 PM
36

Stuff like this sucks being a libertarian. Legal equality with a restricted government means not using the power of the state to close down Male-Only spaces AND Female-Only Spaces. But if you're going to have Gender-Equality laws, I can't expect people to let only the feminists use that power
/r/MensRights19/04/13 09:35 PM
1

Equity = Cosmic Justice
/r/MensRights08/04/13 03:36 PM
14

The main issue is that fields with heavy gender (or any specific subgroup) imbalances develop a culture that is hostile towards outsiders. I'm not saying this is 100% wrong, but this is a massive claim about human behavior on mass and requires massive evidence in turn. "A man becoming a Kindergarten teacher" I would assume will be more likely admonished by external rather than inside the group sources. In fact, I've never ever ever ever ever ever ever heard anyone talk about how female kindergar…
/r/MensRights07/04/13 06:44 PM
5

You're right, added /s syntax for clarification
/r/MensRights07/04/13 06:27 PM
28

"Hey can you help me with this?" "No fuck off, I don't have time asshole" "Hey can you help me with this?" "Sure, no problem!" = hostile, creepy, and demeaning. The vast majority of women I've talked to who don't go into STEM do it because STEM is way more difficult than any liberal arts degree. Proofs by induction, three dimension calculus, and Fourier transforms are way harder than writing a paper on undocumented workers. (its the same reason most MEN don't get STEM degrees or drop out). But a…
/r/MensRights07/04/13 06:11 PM
20

Yes you have a 100% fair reading of my comment. I was totally discussing the decision theory of academic majors and not the misconceptions of a female's treatment in STEM. /s
/r/MensRights07/04/13 05:56 PM
42

Or he's seen how moderately attractive women can literally get guys to do their work for them in STEM. In the very least they get an absurd amount of patience in getting help or having things explained to them.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 04:22 PM
1

I'm really not understanding what you're arguing here, and I don't want to put words into your mouth. But it seems like you're suggesting one person's self-identification is more important than another person's disagreement with that self-identification. If so, why? AKA: "I don't think you're a robot, because X, Y, or Z." is wrong? That would mean an individual is inherently obliged to agree with something they honestly believe is a self-delusion in another person. Theres a BIG HUGE difference, …
/r/MensRights06/04/13 08:17 PM
10

Like, if you identify as one thing, that's what you are, PERIOD, and it's offensive to contest that. Isn't that kind of a silly statement? If I identify myself as a robot it doesn't make me a robot does it? In fact, if it were true that one's self-identity of gender is what you were, "PERIOD", then why have sex change surgeries? Isn't the existence of a sex change surgeries paramount evidence that even people with 'contradictory gender' find physicality to be immensely important to the discussio…
/r/MensRights06/04/13 01:09 AM
15

immigration, lol! Yeah MRAs are always talking about immigration policy /s
/r/MensRights05/04/13 11:19 PM
386

For those who don't know why he's getting slammed, Joe Rogan said he didn't think transsexual women( who used to be a man) should be put in the MMA ring with women. He believes a sex change doesn't do enough to make up for being born a man in terms of reaction times, bone structure(like hip placement), muscle memory(muscle grown prior to change), and other differences. This is a hilarious debate, because he's essentially being insulted for not wanting a man to unfairly beat up female opponents. …
/r/MensRights05/04/13 07:26 PM
1

Yeah so I read cannabisextracts as cannabis sextracts and became very confused
/r/MensRights04/04/13 05:51 PM
9

To take a rather extreme example- Osama Bin Ladin was a Muslim. Are all Muslims like Osama? Of fucking course not. However, many people would say Islamic ideology shaped his actions and views. Saying, "Well Osama was crazy and an outlier therefore we can't/shouldn't call him Muslim," doesn't work either. These women believe 'objectification' is victimization to the level of rape. While extreme, yes, where did they get this idea? A Crazy-Feminist, Crazy-Christian, Crazy-Muslim, are all particular…
/r/MensRights03/04/13 08:04 PM
80

I don't know what's up... I've tried showing my Offical Male Privilege card to the scary homeless people around town but it doesn't seem to work? It's almost like they're more motivated by an addiction to crack cocaine than participating in the Paitriarchy Conspiracy Against All Women!?
/r/MensRights30/07/12 07:15 PM
4

Partially, but SRS also mob raids other subreddits and attacks single comments. A facebook or blog post or news article are all written with separate levels of mind fullness and respectability, but each far greater than a comment to some cat picture. They post insulting replies and then down vote anyone trying to explain themselves rationally, taking advantage of the fact negative posts are hidden. They even link to comments deep in a conversation. They arent just pointing things out, they organ…
/r/MensRights25/07/12 07:45 PM
4

You are right, but I doubt its going to stop. Hear me out. MRM sites, or a subreddit like this, are the only place in our entire society where anyone can question the obvious manipulation and bad logic of certain brands of femenism. MRM wants to be a tight group with narrow goals, but that's going to be tough, because there is no doorman. I'm not saying this post isn't nessicary or good... But you better expect to have to keep repeating it. In the outside world even uttering the possibility that…
/r/MensRights25/07/12 06:47 PM
0

Be careful not to confuse evolutionary purpose with mental intentionality. are solely for the purpose of increasing the women's sexual appeal. Of course, but that doesn't mean they're personally aware of why they're doing it. Just like a man who enjoys training his ability to hunt aquatic creatures thinks he's 'going fishing to get out of the house.'
/r/MensRights18/07/12 11:35 PM
3

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fXGs_7Yted8 According to PBS Offbook on reddit, SRS is a pro-feminist group that wants to bully the 'sexist bullies'
/r/MensRights18/07/12 02:23 PM
4

Hmmm, I stumbled into this thread/subredit and I'm nooooo seductionist... but I always crack people up and I've studied humor. Watching a ton of standup seemed to help me a lot. The periods of my life where I watch the most is where I seem to be the funniest. Its werid though. You'd be surprised how sometimes a random joke you heard just seems to flow out from nowhere. Its kinda creepy, it just, happens. I suggest watching it and not just listening to it, body language blah blah blah. There are …
/r/seduction18/07/12 12:21 PM
1

The post on /r/gaming quickly became a shitstorm with the SRS butthurt training fray, frostrune herself posting to defend herself Oooooo drama post wheres the link? I want to read it! ... I'm a bad person aren't I?
/r/MensRights18/07/12 10:30 AM
4

I really like the quote I felt a lot of pity for Karen... she is getting way too angry over a simple image... on the internet. Lashing out over and over and over and over again like that? Seems like she needs help.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 09:55 AM
11

You people don't get how 4 Chan works. They love pissing people off, and "rustling jimmies" aka getting a rise out of people. Period. They post pictures of black guys dating white women on racist blogs. They post "Aryan" brotherhood logos on African American sites. They spend all their time pissing each other off, and love teaming up to piss others off. Will they make it look like menrights people attacked femenism, of course. Its way less funny to them unless they do that. They get to piss off …
/r/MensRights18/07/12 08:16 AM
11

Comedians aren't having a conversation with you, they're doing a set. Yelling at a comedian on stage is like interrupting a play mid action. Its not only hurting the comedian but everyone else who is trying to watch. Its not only rude, its fucking insane- What is he expected to do? Not continue the play? Try to come up with 6 months of material on the spot? Do people not know this?
/r/MensRights17/07/12 12:28 AM
1

How the fuck does this get written? Its under "opinion." Do the authors submit the article? Are they chosen by someone? Do they get paid? I also want free money for doing nothing! Do these people know if they could prove that RAPE is too AWFUL to be FUNNY they would WIN A FUCKING NOBEL PRIZE? That literally goes against two centuries of research on humor
/r/MensRights17/07/12 12:13 AM
2

Okay I get having extra bank account just in case. Hell, just in case some kind of identity theft occurs it might be a good idea. But whats with the whole Ron Swanson Buried Treasure?
/r/MensRights16/07/12 11:59 PM
1

Virgin shaming is a good name, but it doesn't capture the whole story. This is way more key: we couldn’t get laid if we tried Virgin only comes up very often here, I think, because Feminists consider most other words which also infer an inability or lack of desire to sleep with women as major no-no words: faggot, dickless, ball-less, etc
/r/MensRights16/07/12 11:51 PM
4

how can they demand the same money? Yuck, demand money? "Tenis" makes money through sponsorships, not through what someone demands or deserves. I tried to explain this to a feminist the other day. Engineers don't make more money than other people because some mystic force called society 'values' engineers and scientists in dem' teevee shows. Engineers can build stuff, like iphones, that people want to give up their money for. Compartive-lit majors rarely create products or services that people s…
/r/MensRights08/07/12 03:16 AM
1

There is a saying: Good things prove God, bad things prove the Devil- all things prove religion. Okay well I actually made up that saying, but I'm doubtful her ideology has any falsifiable elements at all. Any criticisms can be easily twisted to justify her beliefs.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 02:02 PM
1

Weird, people really didn't like your answer, yet no one else was willing to answer me.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 01:13 AM
2

what does triggering mean?
/r/MensRights17/06/12 02:31 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter