| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Socialists marxists BTFOWell, most businesses are started by the individual founder applying his savings and seeking debt from a local bank. As the company grows, more sophisticated equity finance would be sought from venture capital firms, generous angel investors and eventually the public stock market in an IPO (most companies don't get this far, though). Under a more socialistic system, the initial founding of a firm would be about the same. You would probably see more people teaming up to pool their savings togethe… | /r/MGTOW | 09/12/17 04:54 AM |
| 5 | Socialists marxists BTFOIf it's invested wisely in maintaining a sane society, taxation isn't bad. Are you okay with capitalists taking the vast majority of the value of your work, and only leaving you with what they call the "market rate of pay"? The folks sitting around conference tables in executive suites aren't doing the real work. They're the welfare leeches. They even got the government to give them special low tax rates on their income because it's "capital gains" instead of hard-earned wages. | /r/MGTOW | 09/12/17 04:28 AM |
| 2 | Socialists marxists BTFOI agree that our current system is a mixed economy (mostly capitalistic, with strong centralized welfare programs). And yes, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot and Castro were pricks. No disagreement here, actually. Lots of suffering and death due to their "revolutions" and subsequent oppressive regimes. What bitter pill am I supposed to swallow, exactly? What "wrong" am I admitting to here? | /r/MGTOW | 09/12/17 03:58 AM |
| 5 | Socialists marxists BTFOSocialism =/= welfare. It's about the workers owning a share of the firms they work at. If you are familiar with employee co-ops, then just imagine socialism as having all companies being co-ops, where the company profits are shared by the workers. The same hiring/firing privileges against lazy people would still apply. | /r/MGTOW | 09/12/17 03:45 AM |
| 0 | Socialists marxists BTFOThere's been a lot of attempts here to package economic socialism/communism with the "cultural marxism" (which isn't a thing). If you hate intersectional/third-wave feminism like a lot of folks here do, that's fine. I hate it too. But Karl Marx literally said nothing about feminism and some folks here are trying to put them all together as leftist boogeyman. If free markets are so great, then what's MGTOW's excuse for withdrawing from the sexual/dating marketplace? | /r/MGTOW | 09/12/17 03:42 AM |
| 0 | Socialists marxists BTFOThe free market of dating rejects a lot of people, and MGTOW is a collection of people who, by no fault of their own, were not seen as valuable in that marketplace. You don't have to like socialism, but preaching about capitalism if you don't own much capital (hint: if you aren't a hedge fund manager you're not a capitalist) seems odd. Defending free markets when the most important marketplace in life (sexual attraction and romantic relationships) is fucking y'all over. It just seems odd, like d… | /r/MGTOW | 09/12/17 03:40 AM |
| 4 | LiberalismSounds like you encountered a proud neoliberal in the wild. | /r/MGTOW | 06/12/17 03:40 AM |
| 11 | My experiences regarding Male-Female relations in the post ‘#MeToo’ worldWomen don't understand men's reaction to #MeToo because in a woman's view, men only begin conversations with women for platonic, nonsexual reasons (and that any "spark" of attraction/compatibility emerges during these conversations, lol) In reality though, 99.9% of times men initiate conversations and friendships with women is for the purpose of staring a sexual relationship. Women think social interactions are mutual partnership, but men see it (correctly) as a pursuit. Now the #MeToo is sendin… | /r/MGTOW | 02/12/17 09:08 PM |
| 2 | The Bell Tolls For Me | TFMSounds like TFM is a fucking socialist | /r/MGTOW | 13/10/17 07:12 PM |
| 1 | Typical Female Post On Finance Reddit.Yeah, having advanced statistical and mathematical acumen > traditional financial knowledge now. The parts that aren't being automated are the social networking aspects, and you have to be born and raised in Greenwich or Manhattan's wealthiest neighborhoods to be successful hobknobbing with rich clients. There's just no longer room in Investment Banking for ambitious middle-class people with a dream. | /r/MGTOW | 12/09/17 05:31 AM |
| 1 | Typical Female Post On Finance Reddit.Finance is only good outside of the top colleges if you're also majoring in accounting or applied mathematics, to either become a CPA/CFA or a quant/financial engineer. If being an Investment Banker in Manhattan is your goal, you have to attend a very prestigious university (not even all Ivy League grads are safe) to get anywhere. It's all about the nepotism and legacy hires on Wall Street. | /r/MGTOW | 12/09/17 05:27 AM |
| 3 | Typical Female Post On Finance Reddit.You better be going to an Ivy League school, or near-Ivy (Stanford, Michigan, UC-Berkeley, Chicago). Don't expect to get a shot at Wall Street without having been to one of these campuses. Even then, it's 99% about kissing ass and networking than how well you do in class. | /r/MGTOW | 12/09/17 05:25 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter