TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

EthologicVestige Archive

View 0 posts and 58 comments by EthologicVestige on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-4

"cut off their head and shit in their neck for it" is actually based on an obscure quote I hijacked. No hate, just hearty disagreement.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 02:04 AM
-8

I don't know why you're trying to argue sense here, they've already made their minds up, that asking not to be groped is somehow misandry. To the MRAs; Nice work. This is totally an issue of men's rights, as important as prostate cancer, male victims of domestic violence/ rape being dehumanised and bias in custody cases. Groping and sexually harassing is not acceptable in western countries. If someone did it to your spouse, you'd want to cut off their head and shit in their neck for it. For thos…
/r/MensRights23/04/13 11:14 PM
13

I don't speak for all MRA obviously, but here is my take. Just as well. Your take is wrong. Historical revisionism is an intellectual crime. Lines like women were equal to us a long time ago when there was a lack of technology and decided to take the easy way out are as ludicrous as saying that cats decided to be cute so they could be domesticated.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 09:19 PM
8

I agree with you about STI testing Quick point there. Many STIs are symptomless and cause permanent infertility in women. In men they present symptoms, and so detection is simple and screening isn't necessary; and after treatment fertility returns to normal. Of course, heterosexual men benefit from there being fewer women walking around without realising they are carrying an STI. While men will usually present symptoms fairly soon, and thus seek treatment, it's no fun getting it in the first pla…
/r/MensRights10/04/13 09:58 PM
4

How the actual fuck does anyone sit through 12 mins of this? I hate to give a misogynist tips, but could you please cut the videos to 3 minutes or less? Nobody is as much in love with your voice as you are!
/r/MensRights09/04/13 01:01 PM
3

Where the fuck did you get that from? Way to twist what I said. I'm on OP's brother's side here, that's why I'm offering advice to OP. I didn't say the mother is a victim of circumstance anywhere, and I fucking defended the father. I even said that it's wrong that she won custody. I didn't say the decision is proper- I said the authorities hands are tied. Nice work, strawman-ing in a thread like this.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 12:44 PM
2

With regard to this, that's really terrible. I'm from England, and I worked at a carehome for 11-16 year olds, during the baby P scandal. I'd listen to my friends comment on it and ask me, "do you ever get anything like that?" And my answer was "Every fucking day". The British public is oblivious to the tens of thousands of abused children. The newspaper headlines actually make it sound like a rare event. Believe it or not, what happened to your nephew could actually have been a lot worse. Some …
/r/MensRights09/04/13 12:06 AM
3

Now I'm sure you know just how fucking FREEZING England is. I sure do. This was a very famous winter, for being EXTRA FUCKING FREEZING. That's EVERY English winter. Carry on. (sorry, the English in me must comment on weather)
/r/MensRights08/04/13 11:49 PM
0

I had a circumcision as an adult, and know how sex was before and after. Here's some things more people should know. A circumcised man has about 10% the sexual sensation of an uncircumcised man. Multiply what you feel by 10- that's what uncircumcised men feel. This isn't true. You have 2,500 nerve endings every cm<sup>2</sup> of your fingertips, but rubbing them together won't bring you to orgasm. Men's sexual pleasure comes from stimulating nerves connected to specific parts of the genitals, pa…
/r/MensRights08/04/13 08:13 PM
15

Couldn't swallow the red pill, huh? try the blue pill...
/r/MensRights08/04/13 02:36 PM
7

Regular feminists claim that false rape claims account for 2-8% of reported rapes, depending upon the source being cited. You can go into any feminist sub and ask, and they'll quote, parrot-like, 2-8%. It's a figure universally accepted by anyone not quoting Kanin's widely discredited 1994 report.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 07:09 PM
1

Just edited my post to include a link.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 02:18 AM
4

You missed the part about how his own defence lawyer advised him to plead guilty, so he'd get 5 years, rather than risk losing in court and getting 40 years. Being a teenage black male facing a white jury, he took the decision to plead guilty so he could be free in his 20s rather than see half his life pissed away. Only in America... the rest of the world doesn't do justice this way, y'know. EDIT: An interview with Brian Banks and his lawyer. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-18266118
/r/MensRights05/04/13 01:43 AM
8

Well, as with any court case you can attempt a legal defence any way you see fit. To be honest legal systems are sufficiently inconsistent that such a case could go either way. my argument is that an adult that freely consents to taking drugs which lower inhibitions understands and consents to those consequences. There's a difference between consenting to take drugs that will lower her inhibitions and consenting to having her consent changed. If he said to her "would you like to take some drugs …
/r/MensRights04/04/13 06:14 PM
20

Under English common law, a situation like this would be subject to the reasonable person test. OP would have a hard time convincing the jury that, as a reasonable person, he could not see how her position of consent had been altered by the application of drugs. He would also need to justify why, if he wasn't sure if she was consenting, he couldn't stop and wait until some other time when she is sober before having sex with her. By all means he could take MDMA with her (although that of course i…
/r/MensRights04/04/13 03:20 PM
24

Uh huh... good thing men never kidnap anyone for ransom...
/r/MensRights02/04/13 01:18 PM
1

Manwomanmyth is created by an unbalanced guy with serious issues about women, the videos generalize and stereotype women constantly. I find them pretty offensive as would most reasonable adults. This thread is on 11 points as of me typing this. Your own comment just got downvoted. Apparently this sub is a little short on "reasonable adults". Have an upvote back for replying respectfully. But you think that because the video is stupid and illogical it means you can make an even stupider and less …
/r/MensRights02/04/13 01:15 PM
4

The fact that you tried to compare this circus of stupidity to a legitimate issue like racism shows you lack all perspective. The fact that this circle of stupidity comes up at all, and that this video is using it to justify why women shouldn't work, shows a lack of perspective. From the billion working women in the world, he finds one he disagrees with, as evidence that all women shouldn't work. (presumably he'd rather we lived in some third world hellhole where 50% of the workforce is kept in …
/r/MensRights02/04/13 10:34 AM
5

miserable pieces of shit like you Sorry, my mistake. Not a hate group at all.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 10:26 AM
1

Toxic blacks and the stupid white men who employ them. Why do the whites who start up companies feel this obligation to employ coloured people, when they clearly only cause problems, and expect all the rules to be bent around their needs? Employers open themselves up to a multitude of liabilities when they employ somebody coloured; will they sue for racial harrassment? Will they sue if they aren't promoted? Whites are unable to say "NO" to blacks. They think if they just give a little more, they…
/r/MensRights02/04/13 08:58 AM
2

Seriously? This has nothing to do with either feminism or men's rights. It's like saying colour blindness is a reason for needing men's rights, or erectile dysfunction.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 06:32 PM
1

Good for you. Nobody should take that.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 01:08 PM
0

I love your posts. They always bring a smile to my face.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 12:49 PM
1

It's made Norway into the best country in the world.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 10:22 PM
-8

It's a feminist blaming all men's problems on the patriarchy. The patriarchy isn't men, it's society's disposition to the idea that men are stronger, smarter but expendable, while women are weaker, incapable but nurturing. Because women are seen as more nurturing, men are less likely to win custody battles. That's an example of the patriarchy helping women and hurting men. The tragedy is, that this patriarchal view has been in place so long it's actually started to become self-fulfilling. Women …
/r/MensRights31/03/13 10:26 AM
1

Upvoted for reddiquette.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 10:05 AM
-8

I'm sure you've all noticed the increasing number of feminist trolls posing as MRAs. Just thought I'd address you trolls directly. Hahaha. This is r/feminism. This space is to discuss the issues that women face. This is not a space for you to preach or defend your ideology. In fact, your doing so is counterproductive because your end up antagonizing real feminists by invading our space and once again trying to make it about you. Just leave. If you want us to have a better opinion of MRAs then cl…
/r/MensRights31/03/13 09:36 AM
5

Sorry, I was replying to Really? I realise your ban was different.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 11:21 PM
15

SRS has strict rules against interrupting the circlejerk. This occasionally leads to perverse situations where an OP is completely wrong on a subject, and the whole sub can see it, but nobody can point it out by posting. Instead they just downvote it away. Still, their sub, their rules. SRS practices what it preaches. There are other feminist forums you can go to for arguing.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 10:54 PM
1

She didn't get the guy sacked. Jeez. She pointed out that he was making tasteless jokes, and the conference threw the guys out, in accordance with their policies. It was PlayHaven that fired him in a knee-jerk, nonsensical decision. Has anybody criticised them, even though they did it? No. Why didn't anonymous go after PlayHaven and demand he be reinstated?
/r/MensRights25/03/13 12:36 AM
0

r/MensRants is thataway.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 06:21 PM
11

OK so let me get this straight. Women choose to denigrate most men and have sex (80%) with only a few (20%) men and this is all men's fault? Run that by me again. Explain how that is men's fault or hurting women. It looks like it is women's fault and hurting men. This is gold. You do realise that all this means is that most women find good looking men attractive, right? That the alternative is some magical world in which everyone finds everyone else equally attractive. Of course, men have never …
/r/MensRights20/03/13 04:37 AM
42

Maybe because most MRAs spend their time trying to downplay or deny serious problems affecting women, like rape, instead of focusing on genuine issues affecting men. Maybe because most MRAs spend their time trolling feminist youtube videos and attacking women's shelters that save women's lives, instead of focusing on genuine issues affecting men. Maybe because most MRAs spend their time attacking and demonising feminism, like it's the forces of evil bent on a vast, male genocide, instead of focu…
/r/MensRights20/03/13 04:07 AM
4

The fact that they are feminist precludes the possibility of them being for mens rights. I mean, look at just the name of the ideology: FEMinism. I like quoting comments like this, just in case the poster realises how stupid it is and tries to delete it.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 12:28 AM
1

I'm actually well within the rules of this subreddit. I don't know who's voting, but I've always abided by reddiquette myself. If I downvote someone it's because their post is abusive, against the rules or irrelevant to the topic. Pretty sure none of the subs have linked here, I found my way here all by myself.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 06:16 PM
0

Well if you at least recognise the appalling suffering women endure in large parts of the world, where women are sold into slavery, not allowed out of their homes without a male guardian present, denied education and property rights, that's a great start. If there's one thing I can't stand it's those apologists who call it part of their culture/ religion, expecting it to be respected. Hitting on women doesn't make you a rapist. I would disagree with any feminist who said that; mainstream feminis…
/r/MensRights18/03/13 06:14 PM
4

You can argue that the MRM is about arguing for legal and social equality, but when large swathes of the members of this movement are openly and proudly misogynistic, you're in a dubious position to claim that a movement is guilty by association from having extremists self identify with it.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 05:40 AM
5

Well my thought on this goes more the way of consent. Where a person hasn't previously consented to being exposed, the default should be that it isn't ok. Every person's experience is different, and every circumstance is different. What if it were a group of intimidating, burly, homosexual men (I'm assuming you're a heterosexual male), and you didn't know the extent of their intentions? Are they going to leave it at that, or are they going to come over to 'try their luck' with you? I realise it'…
/r/MensRights18/03/13 04:15 AM
4

I don't know what this article is talking about when it says that nobody has heard of the Delhi rape. The whole world knows about it in brutal detail. It has been the number 1 most read article on BBC news website for weeks now; and sub-stories about the protests, about the victim's fight for survival and death, the accused found hanged in his prison cell, etc have all been among the most read articles.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 01:48 AM
6

Well, I realise you're asking MRAs, but for what it's worth I'm a feminist and mine is 2. You're damn right I'd be angry if men did this to a woman, and I'm just as angry at women doing this to a man. This commercial is dispicable. Question though; are you serious about 1 being your first choice? You'd be ok with people ripping off your clothes in public, so long as women have to take that too?
/r/MensRights18/03/13 01:19 AM
3

Perpetrators of crime should always be held to full account for their actions, but this case says as much about the crass stupidity of catholic dominated society where divorce is heavily stigmatised and requires onerous hoops to be jumped through in order to obtain. That anyone should feel like they should have to stay with a violent individual is a tragedy. In this regard I think men's rights activists and feminists are in agreement.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 12:56 AM
0

Don't be so stupid... the CPS isn't in the business of covering up statistics.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 09:10 PM
1

You're an awful human being for not censoring the username and where it was posted.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 02:56 AM
6

I haven't recorded every conversation I've had with men. But you have my word on it that the men I've spoken to all called for women everywhere to be raped and enslaved. Since I didn't video it, you'll have to assume my claims are legit. right? I've talked to them on multiple cases, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 01:03 PM
7

Oh, well that settles it then. Because evidence is for pussies.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 12:51 PM
11

What??? Nobody ever said catcalling is rape. This video refutes an argument that hasn't been made. The video basically just said that a girl on tumblr said, like, when she was asked if she'd ever been raped, that, she, uh, was like, telling about all the times she's, like, been catcalled. No dice. No credible feminist source, beyond perhaps the odd 14 year old blog commenter failing at argument, has ever seriously claimed that catcalling is rape.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 11:51 AM
0

Saying that men's earnings have gone down as women's earnings have gone up is like saying that as I pour my beer into a glass, the beer in the bottle decreases. Fewer women were earning in the 70s, and those who were earned less. Men HAD to earn more in order to support their unemployed housewives. It's hardly a scandal that in the modern world, where both husband and wife typically work, that the man earns comparatively less. As a household income, it's probably gone up. But in real terms, the …
/r/MensRights09/03/13 07:05 PM
1

dying hundreds of times over to save the royal princess might actually be far more damaging to men if you really think about it. I don't want you to ever be able to undo the stupidity you just did.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 06:26 PM
9

Why the fuck should TEDx staff or any other individual on Earth have to read the kind of abuse being thrown around about this? Shut up about free speech, you don't have any on a privately run website. I'm fed up of the sense of entitlement going around. You don't have the right to post anything, let alone hate-speech. The constitution, which only applies to Americans anyway, only protects against the government limiting speech. A website is fully entitled to turn off comments, because "fuck you,…
/r/MensRights09/03/13 06:23 PM
2

And you wonder why she turned the comments off, with such brilliant, reasoned debaters as you.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 06:05 PM
1

The daily mail is increasingly earning a reputation for simply making news stories up. here here here here here i can go on all day. It's called "click-baiting", tricking people into viewing the article and generating more advertising. It ought to be fraud, but unfortunately there's no law against them making up fictitious stroies off the top of their heads. TL;DR? if you read an interesting daily mail story, google it to see if any other news websites have reported it. If not, it's BS.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 10:41 PM
1

Find a non-daily mail source.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 10:28 PM
-4

Not or. This was the comment section on her previous video. Check for yourself... there weren't any intelligent, reasoned responses. Just anti-semitism, "slut", "whore", "get back in the kitchen", threats of rape/murder, etc. People accused her of keeping the comments in that previous video open in order to discredit her legitimate detractors. Now everyone's angry that it's closed. Mark my words, if she decides to allow comments on this video, it'll be filled with such vileness that any intellig…
/r/MensRights08/03/13 09:37 PM
-4

The next video is part 2, in which she moves on to the damsel in distress trope in modern videogames. You're welcome. I expect it will include obvious modern videogame damsels in distress such as: Beatrice in Dante's Inferno, Santiago's wife in Gears of War, Isaac's wife in Dead Space, the president's daughter in Metal Gear Solid 3 and Resident Evil 4. There's prolly Nintendo games too, but I don't play those.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 08:31 PM
5

You know full well why the comments/ ratings were disabled. Her kickstarter video received thousands of abusive comments, as brigaders from reddit, 4chan and every other dark hole of the internet poured in. Along with vile language, there were calls for her and other feminists to be raped, killed, etc for expressing an opinion. How any decent man, men's rights or not, could justify such a reaction is beyond me. Don't like what she has to say? Then explain in a reasoned, fair way your points of d…
/r/MensRights08/03/13 07:41 PM
23

What the hell? This image is saying that men AREN'T hidden rapists at heart. How have you gotten the exact opposite message??? Read it again. It's saying that those people blaming a woman's appearance for her being raped assume that men are all baying rapists, who's urges are only contained by women covering up. This image is a defence of men, saying we're not like that- not an attack on them. And yes I am offended, when people make the "provocative clothing" defence for rape, saying the attacke…
/r/MensRights07/03/13 01:22 PM
3

Yawn. Not sure why, as a feminist, I'm even trying to help you guys out here. But if you can't recognise the same troll saying anything to get your upvotes, somebody has to help you out. If something seems too good to be true, it's probably the same troll with the same tedious writing style.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 08:02 PM
1

Relevant.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 07:17 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter