| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Rules for thee but not for meThat std chart doesnt provide any reasons for the lower std rates. You assuming its because theyre uncircumcised is foolish. Its not simply bacteria, its the type of it. Anaerobic bacteria is between the foreskin and penis in uncircumcised men, and the environment that region provides is perfect for anaerobic bacteria, increasing the chance of HIV. And sure the chance is already low, but you'd be foolish to deny an opportunity to be safer. If you were in a coma and you had a 1% chance of dying, … | /r/MensRights | 04/09/18 12:55 AM |
| -4 | Rules for thee but not for meYou've still given no source to uncircumcision being the cause for lower stds in Europe. What health benefits? Eliminating the chance for bacteria to collect between the foreskin and penis. Lower chance for HIV by 60% according to the world Health Organization. | /r/MensRights | 04/09/18 12:41 AM |
| -5 | Rules for thee but not for meSource for first claim? Because all I've read is health benefits from circumcision, with no one referencing benefits from uncircumcised except more sexual pleasure. | /r/MensRights | 04/09/18 12:21 AM |
| -8 | Rules for thee but not for meUncircumcised is not healthier lmao. What are you on? | /r/MensRights | 04/09/18 12:16 AM |
| -13 | Rules for thee but not for meBut circumcision is good for you | /r/MensRights | 04/09/18 12:12 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter