TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Evets616 Archive

View 2 posts and 234 comments by Evets616 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

You know those bullshit takes on facebook that pop up on Father's Day where some women can't even let there be one day that celebrates men? You know what I'm talking about, right? The ones where people go out of their way to congratulate single moms on Father's Day? The ones that make the people posting them look like a bunch of bitter assholes with no real point other than to be shitty towards men? That's exactly how this post and all the other posts like it sound today.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 02:26 PM
1

You aren't a parent. You don't have kids and you don't know what it's like to raise them and love that kid. Trust me, it's not the same feeling that you have for your Fleshlight. I think paternity fraud is horrible and would love if testing was mandatory at birth before the father could be added to the birth certificate. Any weaponization of the state through claims should be punishable. But this absolutely toxic, stupid bullshit from people shouting about how they place no value in a parent chi…
/r/MensRights06/05/21 01:15 PM
1

That's some incel bullshit. You have no idea what you're talking about. It's incredibly insulting to all the different types of families that raise kids that aren't blood relations. This type of attitude is exactly the shit that feminists love to point at when they talk about toxic masculinity. I hope you grow the fuck up in case you ever get the chance to have a kid.
/r/MensRights05/05/21 10:18 PM
-16

This kid basically feels that by suing, his dad is saying that there was no value to their relationship because they weren't related by blood. So your mom's a fucking liar and now your dad is essentially saying he doesn't give a fuck about you. Telling the dad not to sue is a desperate plee to not have that relationship upended. The kids are in an awful spot. This sub is so quick to treat these situations like there's no value to the father-child relationship, as if years of raising and loving a…
/r/MensRights05/05/21 04:22 AM
3

Given that this is LeftWingMaleAdvocates, I don't agree with basically any of it. It's just a list of conservative ideas and blames straw-man versions of liberal opinions for problems in the black community while ignoring the very large elephant in the room, institutional racism. I think trying to pin the problems facing the Black community on feminist/left values and ignoring racism is about as conservative as you can get. This isn't just a "bash feminists" sub.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/08/20 02:18 PM
4

What if the man agrees to raise the child by himself but just wants her to give birth? That's why I think both the father and mother should have equal say whether to abort or not I get it. It makes sense on paper. Go watch some youtube videos by women talking about being pregnant, giving birth, and the after-effects of that entire process. Or post a question to a women's subreddit asking. I'd bet you that this has been done several times and you could search for it. Go ahead. Read what women say…
/r/MensRights17/08/20 12:36 PM
3

100% agree on the posted links. There's bias in the system in favor of women receiving either more benefits or less punishments. I really don't think throwing out phrases like "the Left’s catechism of victimhood" does any favors to the points you're making. It doesn't exactly jive with the subbreddit either. The sidebar talks about incorporating male issues into left-wing thought, not shitting on left-wing thought in favor of male issues. Complaining about some culture of imagined victimhood whi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/07/20 12:10 PM
2

well, it sounds like you've found a very convenient narrative that manages to absolve society of any wrongdoing
/r/MensRights24/06/20 09:51 AM
2

so that's a yes
/r/MensRights24/06/20 12:54 AM
2

Are you saying that "black people are more violent" is the explanation for the prisons in America? Do you think institutional racism bears some responsibility?
/r/MensRights23/06/20 05:22 PM
6

What can be done about this? Do we all have to just keep it to ourselves and carry on and hold our noses and vote for Biden? I think it's a matter of which voices get amplified because it suits the needs of the people who control the media. Putting forth the most divisive opinions of the Left all the time just pisses off people whose lives would be changed for the better by the types of policies you mentioned. I think it shows when you look at polling on healthcare reform, military spending, col…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/06/20 06:00 PM
1

I noticed that she didn't list doctors there. I wonder why...
/r/MensRights25/03/20 07:31 PM
1

Sorry, are you trying to use that study to show that the original post is valid and that being trans is 100% a mental disorder? Because your link doesn't do that.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 03:46 PM
4

No one is going around and just cutting dicks off at a moment's notice because they hate men. It's not some snap decision that is done to permanently alter a kid. Even with the people who are very supportive of it, they advocate years of individual and family therapy and reversible transitions to make absolutely sure the kid actually wants to change. here's a great article in The Atlantic about a girl who was on the path to being transitioned and eventually realized that it wasn't actually what …
/r/MensRights17/03/20 03:45 PM
5

Second - I'm willing to place bets that the actual numbers haven't tripled - the reporting has. And will continue to go up as the politically correct types get their own back as men start learning it's OK to report violence and rape against them. I wish that they would have taken the time to make this point. They spend all that time talking about how men are conditioned to not report these incidents but then don't make the obvious comment that we're finally seeing them start to. No thinks that w…
/r/MensRights30/01/20 03:45 PM
7

It's a start though.
/r/MensRights30/01/20 03:42 PM
3

Sure, waste in the system is always an issue. I was just spitballing about what would help deal with people who just weren't using it for their kids at all. Neither is perfect, but I'm significantly less offended by bureaucracy than deadbeats misusing child support.
/r/MensRights29/01/20 07:34 PM
1

Yep, that's a better way of explaining it. Now I'm thinking of how an FSA works with your healthcare. It's tax free money that has to be used only on certain things. And since it's basically a debit card, you can use it to set up things like auto-pay for bills/rent.
/r/MensRights29/01/20 04:54 PM
11

Setting aside the debate over how much and how long child support and alimony should be, you know what might work? Instead of the non-custodial parent's wages going directly to the other parent, what if they were just taken as a special tax that is given directly to the budget of various entitlement programs? Instead of this deadbeat using child support for car payments, she's given food stamps, free school lunch, and perhaps a tax rebate on rent up to a certain amount. This way, money is given …
/r/MensRights29/01/20 02:24 PM
3

You say there's "an illusion" of racial preference. You say that it's crazy to think the police care about race. Study after study show that this stuff happens. When you look at who gets arrested more, or shot more, or searched more, even when you account for criminal history of the person, minorities are much more likely to be stopped, searched or shot. Remember, I just said "after you account for criminal history", so don't reply about how black people commit more crimes, so of course they'll …
/r/MensRights20/01/20 06:18 PM
-18

Had me right up to the last line. There are privileges to color and gender and denying that they exist is just as bad as generalizing privilege to mean that all white men have it super easy. If you were driving and got pulled over, would you rather be white or a minority? I'm pretty sure I know everyone's answer to that, regardless of being in the US or Australia. Would you rather apply for a job with an ethnic-sounding or a "whiter" one? Studies show that for a long while now, you're better off…
/r/MensRights20/01/20 02:07 PM
2

my family always talked about it like this. if it's too hot, "turn the air down" if it's too cold, "turn the air up" season doesn't matter. I still default to talking about it this way, even though my wife annoying asks every single time what I meant.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 01:05 PM
20

Gaps can be a sign of an underlying problem though. Would you agree that the lack of men in children's education is due to systemic biases and negative attitudes about perceiving all men as potential predators? I think that's something we've seen on here repeatedly, men who would like to go into education but don't want to deal with every woman treating them like a fucking pedo all the time. Or even the simple attitude that men aren't interested in or good at dealing with kids. That's a thing to…
/r/MensRights27/11/19 02:48 PM
4

Study from africa basically saying that if you don't use condoms, then you're less likely to get aids or stds if you are circumcised. You know, a totally applicable situation for the western world.
/r/MensRights13/11/19 08:01 PM
1

At best, your argument relies on the fact that men are more desperate to meet women, or more benevolent towards women, which is still a matter of capitalizing on a imbalance of power between genders or gender roles(it's effectively capitalizing on classism). This is wrong. I'm not saying it's right. I think I was pretty clear that I didn't like it. I called it shitty and sexist. I'm also not making an argument, man. I'm describing exactly what is happening. This would be like charging black peop…
/r/MensRights30/10/19 08:37 PM
3

I really don't think this one is discrimination. It's kinda like google and facebook. If you aren't paying for a product, then you are the product. Clubs let in women for free or for less money because more men go to clubs where there are more women. u/Skepnoblade_ made this point too. It's sexist against both genders but it different ways. It treats women like a object that men have to pay to get access to. It creates a bad mindset where once someone has paid to get it and then paid for drinks,…
/r/MensRights30/10/19 12:19 PM
1

First things first, thanks for the reply and I'm glad we can both acknowledge wanting the best for others. People get so caught up with arguing online that concern for others gets lost. We don’t let kids drink or smoke or join the military at 10, you won’t even let your 10 year old get a TATTOO because that’s too permanent, but you’ll let them get rid of their penis? I wouldn't let my kid make a decision like this at 10, no. I try to think about it in terms of knowing myself. How early did I kno…
/r/MensRights24/10/19 07:04 PM
0

https://www.adamconover.net/adding-evidence-to-the-discussion-of-trans-issues-on-joe-rogans-podcast/ specifically, these aren't hormones being given to kids, they are puberty blockers to prevent the onset of adult features that are unwanted. The drug used to do this isn't normally used until 12 or 13 and is used for only to block puberty. From what i read, its significantly easier to fully transition if you avoid puberty rather than having to undo its effects. Conveniently, the drugs used to del…
/r/MensRights24/10/19 05:20 PM
-6

Here's some further discussion by adam conover after that podcast. https://www.adamconover.net/adding-evidence-to-the-discussion-of-trans-issues-on-joe-rogans-podcast/
/r/MensRights24/10/19 05:10 PM
2

I'm very, very sorry that you had to go through that. Not every gay person is a pedophile. There are straight pedophiles too. Regardless of which gender they molest, they're all monsters for doing that to children. I don't know how going through something like that would affect me. It would probably have made me angry too. So I can understand how you would have that hatred for the person who did that to you and then generalize it onto all gay people. It's not all gay people though. The vast majo…
/r/MensRights24/10/19 04:55 PM
-15

citation needed.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 02:32 PM
-8

Stop trying to quicken the degradation and corruption of societies last few remaining morals. do you really think that's what is motivating people? Edit: if you want to talk suicide rates, the people that DO have gender changes are the ones offing themselves. Studies that show LGBT people, particularly teens, have higher suicide rates and attempts specifically say that those "who experience high levels of rejection from their families during adolescence" are significantly more likely to attemp s…
/r/MensRights24/10/19 02:11 PM
-16

do you really think these decisions are made with such little thought?
/r/MensRights24/10/19 01:44 PM
0

Given your other comments, particularly about how we're being erased from history and having our statues torn down in the streets, it's pretty obvious you aren't one of them. ????? You replied to another person saying: We're already being erased from history, with our statues being torn down on the street and in parks, our pictures being taken down at universities, our heroes being replaced by non-Whites or women in fiction, etc. which is why I made the comment. The very term "White supremacist"…
/r/MensRights04/10/19 07:38 PM
0

Self-hating Whites are a thing. Given your other comments, particularly about how we're being erased from history and having our statues torn down in the streets, it's pretty obvious you aren't one of them. You reserve that for those uppity minorities, right? Bit of help for you: if you find yourself upset because statues of traitorous white supremacists are being removed because the country is deciding not to glorify their treason and hatred any more, you should get some help. The fact that you…
/r/MensRights04/10/19 02:44 PM
0

Right, I'm racist and sexist against myself now. Hit me with some more SJW taking points about my internalized self hatred. No one is every going too take any of the real issues we face seriously if people like you keep making extremist comparisons in such poor taste. How the fuck are they supposed to listen to our demands for better parental rights or a serious response to the issue of many homeless men? You think people are going to have a nice discussion with us over the real causes of the so…
/r/MensRights04/10/19 12:52 AM
-2

This is still hyperbole. This portrayal and treatment of Jews in pre-war Nazi Germany was in fact very similar to the portrayal and treatment of White men in 21st century America Saying something like this means that you seem to think there is no basis whatsoever for any of the criticisms of white men, that they are being unfairly scapegoated. Are you honestly claiming that none of the complaints from women and minorities are real? And comparing whites in the US to whites in African countries th…
/r/MensRights03/10/19 06:08 PM
-4

The parallel with the way Jews were portrayed in pre-war Nazi Germany is striking, really. White men are not being scapegoated for the problems of our country as a precursor to rounding us up in detention camps for eventual murder. That's not ever going to fucking happen. Comparing white men to the treatment of the jews in WW2 is pure hyperbole and hurts any chance there is at people listening to the actual good arguments there are about problems we face.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 04:15 PM
17

Like being a Jew in 1930’s Germany Your entire comment is unnecessarily hyperbolic. Statements like that are why people don't take any of this stuff seriously.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 12:44 PM
1

Education is definitely an area where the wheel has spun the other way. More women are have been graduating from college than men since 1995 and the gap now is the higher now than it ever was when men were getting more degrees. I think we'd all agree that if the numbers were reversed, there'd be a massive outcry to help out. But we still hear much more about getting women educated. Maybe globally that works out, but not in the US anymore, not for a generation now. You see some articles but yeah,…
/r/MensRights25/09/19 02:04 PM
6

We're not giving blacks shittier schools, we're positively discriminating in favor of whites by giving them better schools. You don't want them to have good schools?!?! That's almost exactly the argument used by US politicians over the last 50 years as they wrote more laws that created a school system more segregated and fucked up than it was in the 60s.
/r/MensRights24/09/19 06:30 PM
1

Then tell me what I said that is wrong? I was literally describing the attitude of the people instituting these policies.
/r/MensRights24/09/19 06:23 PM
-37

This isn't a zero sum game. Helping someone who needs help doesn't mean someone is hurting you to do it. The statement in the image implies there is a negative discrimination against the specific group already. Without getting into the question of it's actual presence, the point is that the Dutch government believes that women are being discriminated against in some way and this "positive" discrimination is meant to offset that. I don't really know anything about gender discrimination in the net…
/r/MensRights24/09/19 12:33 PM
1

The procedure is to falsify the document, I don't think there's any way around that. If you do the same to your tax documents, I think the IRS will want to have a word with you. I think the big disconnect here is over what the birth certificate is. Before I get downvoted, try to read the whole post. The birth certificate isn't some scientific document describing the physical act that occurred. It's a legal document establishing the legal identity of human being. The state cares less about the bi…
/r/MensRights19/09/19 12:34 PM
34

Here's the full quote from the debate: And finally, my plan is about making sure that, in America's criminal justice system, we de-incarcerate women and children, that we end solitary confinement and that we work on keeping families intact. And as president of the United States, knowing the system from the inside, I will have the ability to be an effective leader and get this job complete. She released her plan for criminal justice reform recently. https://t.ly/RXpp3 Here's a relevant part: Inve…
/r/MensRights16/09/19 06:26 PM
0

It's clear that you pretty strongly disagree with my main argument. You don't believe there's any value or worth to the relationship this man built with his son. The fact that you would try to twist my insistence that there is something of value there into some claim that I'm treating the man like an ATM says a lot more negative things about your stance than it does mine. Either way, we're not going to agree in any way on central point about what makes a father.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 03:28 AM
1

Show me where the guy in this article said that he was going nuts because he hated it the whole time. You're so quick to make comments that I'm naive and foolish for thinking that marriage and parenthood are something other than slavery. You're far quicker to see it negatively than I am to be the opposite.
/r/MensRights04/07/19 03:06 AM
1

He's literally not a parent, that's the point. He literally is. He raised that kid. That's the point. That's what being a fucking parent means. It's not just a dna test. This attitude that so many men have on here that only blood matters is insulting to the families out there that aren't based on that.
/r/MensRights04/07/19 03:02 AM
1

If he didn't give a shit about this kid and is fine walking away? Then fine, he was a shitty parent anyway for caring so little. But there are way too many people acting like it's so easy to ghost this kid after being his dad for 8 years. If he cared and loved that boy, then he owes him more than that.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 08:17 PM
1

yeah, with my kid.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 08:12 PM
1

That makes it okay to abandon him? There's more of a connection there than dna. You parent this kid for years and then just walk away? He didn't do anything to you.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 08:05 PM
0

Ok, you go tell the little boy why the love he feels for his dad is meaningless.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 07:35 PM
0

No one discussed any other connections to children. Sorry, I thought I was pretty clear when talking about the emotional bonds that this man created with his son. The connection I was talking about is from the relationship of being a parent to a child, being involved in their daily life for years. But people who make these arguments never care about the men, just what they can do for others. I'm specifically trying to grasp this dude's situation and all the different things he might be feeling. …
/r/MensRights03/07/19 07:13 PM
1

You're calling a child, who a day before the news dropped, was this man's beloved son, a parasite. That's pretty messed up. They developed a bond. They are family. To act like that should mean nothing to the man or the child is to be willfully ignorant. DNA is not the sole indicator of parenthood.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 05:54 PM
1

You're right, he isn't related by blood. But that doesn't change the fact that he spent 8 years parenting that boy as his own. That relationship with the boy, that emotional investment: those things make that boy his son as much as anything else. Being a parent is more than just a dna test.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 04:57 PM
1

i was going to simply tag you as "crazy red piller" and leave your comments in place but every time I see another one, it's worse. So I guess it's "ignore" then.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 04:50 PM
0

This is what I'm talking about. This type of reply where only biological connections to children are treated as valid. Being a parent is more than just being a sperm donor. You've said that you have 2 bio kids and 2 others that you raise. Is this what you think of those kids that live with you? That they aren't yours and you'd turn your back on them if it went south with your wife? Being a parent is not only about having a biological connection. There are plenty of people with that connection wh…
/r/MensRights03/07/19 04:49 PM
1

Read the sentence you quoted again. I said that I CAN understand the logic. You didn't need to reply with this rape scenario.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 04:38 PM
1

You made some good points in another reply, but in this one and specifically the "FTFY" reply, it really feels like you're repeating the response that I see on here frequently where the biological connection trumps everything and finding out it isn't there instantly invalidates and removes all connections to the kid. I can't wrap my head around this. 8 years of being a parent to this kid, from birth. And so many people say their response would be like "fuck that, i'm out." it makes it sound like…
/r/MensRights03/07/19 03:47 PM
3

Trying to force them to ignore their pain is harmful. I am definitely not trying to do that or advocate that. In reply to statements like yours, where someone says that the pain of betrayal would warp everything so much that they wouldn't be able to be in that kid's life anymore, I can understand the logic of that. Not having gone through any of this and trying to understand, that makes more sense to me. I certainly respect the fact that I can't know what goes on in another guy's head and wouldn…
/r/MensRights03/07/19 03:39 PM
2

You may not agree and that's ok... All I was intending for you to acknowledge was that many do not feel the same way about this that you do. I definitely understand that many don't feel like I do and that my experience is very different from most. I was just trying to understand better. I appreciate you taking the time to reply.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 02:29 PM
5

I bolded some parts that important to my reply. I may well love that boy with all my heart but he's not my son and all I expect I'd see when I looked at him is the cruelty she subjected us both to. I don't much care if that's selfish... I never had any obligation to either of them. I may care for him, and he for me, but he is not my son. He is a boy I raised while a complete shit of a human being lied to us both. If he still wanted contact I'm not sure how I'd handle it. Maybe I'd suffer it for …
/r/MensRights03/07/19 01:34 PM
8

I understand that my view is definitely colored by my experience. If I may, I'd like to ask you a couple follow up questions. I'm trying to better understand your opinion. So let's say you're in the same situation as the man in the article. You've raised your son for 8 years. Regardless of how that 8 years with the mother was, presumably you've had a good relationship with your son. And now here you are, finding out that your wife cheated and your son is actually not your biological child. For y…
/r/MensRights03/07/19 01:13 PM
22

The wife is a terrible person for deceiving her son and husband, no question. I feel awful for the son here. The message that this action by the father sends is that the father's pain and anger are more important than the relationship he had with his son. I fully support the dad's right to go after the mom and divorce her or whatever. And maybe it's just shitty reporting that left stuff out, but I hope to god that he made his son aware that this isn't the son's fault and doesn't make him suddenl…
/r/MensRights03/07/19 12:17 PM
2

Calling people racists, assaulting them for wearing the hats or demanding they remove them is infringing on their freedom. Not good. I absolutely agree. It was never my point to say that people can't wear the hats, simply to try to clarify why people get so upset about them. It's not as simple as some commenters here were saying "it's just a hat supporting the president".
/r/MensRights09/05/19 11:52 AM
-2

It's gotta be tough to do the gymnastics required to be okay with Trump considering how his own words show him for who he is exactly.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 04:49 PM
-4

Really. There were links to things he has actually said. Quotes of his that are recorded and often on camera. Verifiable instances of him being racist and you consider that "nothing" and "a laugh". That says a lot about your viewpoints.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 04:13 PM
-2

Trump is not a racist. https://www.vox.com/2016/7/25/12270880/donald-trump-racist-racism-history
/r/MensRights08/05/19 02:49 PM
-7

Death Threats are never okay. And I know for a fact that obviously there are people who aren't racists who voted for Trump. But the dude has actively courted the support of some people with incredibly toxic ideologies and his ego and his own racism refuse to let him back away from that support (fine people on both sides). Wearing visible support for a guy who is a racist, openly supports racists, not to mention all the shit against women he does/says, signals to people that you support him and h…
/r/MensRights08/05/19 12:35 PM
2

Whatever the actual rate is, the amount of abuse going on is too high and the system needs a hard look at reforming it.
/r/MensRights02/05/19 04:03 PM
1

You talk about this situation of trapping a man and exploiting him for money as the default, as if there isn't another way that things happen. My post was specifically about how a man and woman can decide together than it benefits the family for one spouse to work while the other focuses on the kids. People can and do make that choice every day. They didn't do it through trickery or anything. It was a smart choice financially for them at the time. That happens. You mention the woman divorcing wh…
/r/MensRights02/05/19 03:47 PM
9

There are plenty of people who have kids and it does make financial sense for one of them to stay home with the kids. Daycare costs a fuckload of money and no everyone has family that can help with that. So you have a couple decide that it makes more financial sense for one of them to stay home with a kid or two and the other to work full time. That time out of the workforce does impact a person's future ability to get a job and earn money. For that reason, I don't have a problem with the concep…
/r/MensRights02/05/19 12:24 PM
0

I don't agree with you about not calling those things socialist. I also don't feel like arguing it out. I'm going to link you to another thread where two people argued this topic. I agree with the responses in the post from the user "letsthinking". I'm guessing you'd agree with the OP. https://is.gd/zthWQj I also don't really really disagree with you on capitalism producing better results. I'm guess we'd disagree on where to draw the line about how regulated the system should be.
/r/MensRights03/04/19 08:13 PM
0

Imagine what is happening if trash like Cardi B get chosen to be president. Don't have to imagine; we're living it right now.
/r/MensRights03/04/19 12:11 PM
0

Let me know how much you hate socialism the next time you drive on a public road or require the services of the fire department or police.
/r/MensRights03/04/19 12:10 PM
0

Where'd I make an argument for endless tolerance? To be clear, I believe the state should be tolerant of almost all things that adult consenting individuals who aren't infringing on the rights of others want to do. Generally, tolerance of hate and intolerance isn't good and isn't something I want the US to do.
/r/MensRights03/04/19 12:09 PM
8

If they want to include Stay a Home Moms, I think it's only fair that we include all of the homeless that are disproportionately men (and often veterans).
/r/MensRights03/04/19 11:55 AM
-6

The fact that you're talking about tolerance as a bad thing doesn't exactly make me want to talk to you anyway.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 04:55 PM
-3

accurate? it's an everyman version of Ayn Rand's bullshit.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 04:47 PM
2

You make your call, I'll make mine. She literally references other laws that different states try to pass about women's bodies when talking about her own suggestions. It's not a "call" to make, unless I'm not getting some secret message about how women like this are evil. Have you seen her so-called Testicular Bill of Rights? Yes, I have. It's hilarious and intended to directly reference actual laws that other states have tried to pass. It calls out the ridiculousness of those laws by framing th…
/r/MensRights22/03/19 05:20 PM
2

You're confused, just like they are. When a woman asks, "What makes you think you get to have a say in my body?!" the answer is, "Because you're telling me to pay for it." No confusion here, friend. Judging by the other replies, perhaps just a lack of hatred towards liberals and women. Depending on which woman's health issue you talk about, it's either cheaper to pay for it now versus additional costs down the line, or ridiculous that we don't already "pay" for it. For example, why is Viagra all…
/r/MensRights22/03/19 05:12 PM
0

Why? She's pointing out a legal issue in a way that doesn't harm anyone but sends a clear message to her fellow lawmakers to try and get them to think about a broader issue. They doen't actually want a log of every time a cop jizzes. Shit, this might have nothing to do with women's bodies per se; it could be a response to this story of a police officer in Georgia raping a 15 year old girl after picking her up for a curfew violation. It happened in August of 2018, right before the Midterms. Regar…
/r/MensRights21/03/19 07:18 PM
8

There needs to be a lot less of that shit. Many times, a good message gets wrapped up in shitty behavior any simply causes the people who you're trying to speak with to ignore you. Hell, this place needs to watch that type of thing too. We leave ourselves open to being dismissed.
/r/MensRights15/02/19 05:16 PM
26

It's no different that religious parents shoving their shit down their kids throats, and it's just as bad.
/r/MensRights15/02/19 04:46 PM
1

"take it out on a person" He has spent years caring for and loving that child. The problem here is allowing the mother's actions to warp that into some sort of attack or insult to that man for being stupid enough to take care of the kid. He did those things as a parent and would continue to do so had the mother's infidelity not come up.
/r/MensRights15/10/18 11:17 AM
1

The article made it pretty clear she still loves her dad, the man who had raised her.
/r/MensRights15/10/18 11:11 AM
17

I know this stuff comes up in relation to a general "look at how shady women are" angle on things, but I really think that the words of the father interviewed in this article are important and not often said. Regardless of the genetic parentage, that man that raised those kids is their Dad. He was the one there through sleepless nights as a baby, helped them take their first steps, ride a bike, etc. The life of being a parent is more important than hospital test. I say this from a different pers…
/r/MensRights12/10/18 04:51 PM
1

It looks like they spent way too much money for a lawyer to give them some legal advice and fire off a couple of letters How much is it worth to not be branded a sex offender, be kicked out of college and have your life ruined? Sure, it seemed like a pretty straight-forward case that should have ended this way, even without a lawyer, but would you be willing to put yourself in that position and trust the university officials to do the right thing for you?
/r/MensRights10/10/18 03:46 PM
-1

The article isn't blaming men, the tweets from the Mormon woman do. The article actually does exactly what you just said and calls for a more nuanced view.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 03:08 AM
1

You're like the fifth person to try and make that dismissive argument about hygeine. A variety of products were mentioned. I apologize for not remembering your specific post. That clearly means you can just consider all arguments made as void.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 04:05 PM
0

It is a healthcare issue. Having a period is not the same using deodorant or shaving. It's not being emotional to describe it as different, because it's different. It's not disingenuous. What most of this feels like is a bunch of people being dismissive of women's concerns and making comparisons that come off as tone deaf and insulting
/r/MensRights28/01/17 12:32 AM
1

I honestly haven't really thought too much about what level of government should address anything. My immediate reaction is federal for both men's and women's issues because the examples that pop into mind are national, like general healthcare, or thinking about every state doing its own version sound like a cluster f***. But i wouldn't say that i was trying to make the claim that everything has to be done that way. I'm sure things could be done locally in different cases
/r/MensRights28/01/17 12:22 AM
-1

It's not about being giving free things, it's about a government health policy ignoring the reality of women's health needs. I get what you're saying. We're not talking about honor killings or women not being allowed to drive. No one is claiming that. This one little issue is simply symptomatic of the overall attitude towards women's health issues.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 10:30 PM
1

Hey, I agree. The strong, doc male who never complains or feels is incredibly harmful and drives other issues, like the suicide rate
/r/MensRights27/01/17 10:27 PM
1

Not sure how to respond to that. Of course its a political act. They see danger in this president. I don't think the timing of the protest somehow invalidates anything
/r/MensRights27/01/17 10:25 PM
-1

Oh, so men have no problem setting asside HSA dollars for deoderant, razors, bodywash... oh, wait... we can't either. Dealing with her period isn't remotely the same as a guy buying deodorant, toilet paper, or any of the other insulting comparisons. Feminists are complaining that they don't have even more over men than they already have. Right, because giving women proper medical coverage means that they have to go out and take it away from a man? Again, this angry attitude being expressed, by p…
/r/MensRights27/01/17 10:23 PM
0

There are ways to discriminate and oppress people that aren't laws and that aren't explicit rights granted in any sort of legal document. If you want to hold everything to that narrow standard, you also eliminate a good chunk of the issues facing men today and I seriously doubt you would deny that those exist.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 08:30 PM
0

I don't know how strongly you can say they were jumping the gun when trump signed an executive order 3 days later reinstating a past policy barring US aid from foreign groups that perform abortions. I'd say it's clear they're going to move quickly on their stated intentions
/r/MensRights27/01/17 01:54 PM
2

Still agree. Some definitely have a strong, ideological dislike of "men", sadly all too often but on or later confirmed by actual bad behavior of a man/men in their lives. I'd agree that not everyone reads up on the intellectual underpinnings of the movement. Most people, you see things you don't like or agree with and when someone comes along with a strong, clear message of who's to blame, it makes sense, gives you a target - which is always easier to digest. And yeah, it doesn't exactly predis…
/r/MensRights27/01/17 11:53 AM
2

Okay.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 11:34 AM
1

First of all, i like how you lumped both sides of this argument into the SJW box. That's hilarious given the discussion in this thread. But you're taking about stuff like this right? http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/14/world/meast/saudi-women-disagree-rights/ Yeah, some of them consider it a good thing. Many don't. Many express the desire for equal legal rights. Whether or not they like it doesn't change the fact that one gender is subject to significant legal restrictions. The "some of them like it" …
/r/MensRights27/01/17 10:40 AM
3

That's great. It's just too bad they won't do the same for policies that make men's lives harder and unsafe. Simply refraining from lying about and opposing the men's rights movement would be an excellent start. I agree. Too many of them treat any discussion of men's issues as an attack on women. I don't expect then to happily rush to help, but it'd be nice if they'd just not shout so loud that we don't need help.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 10:17 AM
1

Women don't shave?
/r/MensRights27/01/17 08:49 AM
3

The tax issue is also about income taxes. You can set aside money in an FSA or HSA directly from your paycheck, to be used only for medical and healthcare expenses. That money is set aside, pre-tax. There's a list of approved items that you can use this money for. Feminine hygiene products aren't covered on the list. FSA info on tampons
/r/MensRights27/01/17 08:37 AM
1

Nowhere did I claim that women don't have some massive privileges. I also didn't deny the existence of men's issues. I don't think it would be a valid argument for a feminist to say that since so many men are billionaires or heads of companies or elected to political office, that therefore there aren't any real issues facing men today. After all, if some men can achieve those things, things are okay for all men. That's ridiculous, right? At times, it's rage inducing. I can see you're angry about…
/r/MensRights27/01/17 08:23 AM
2

Yes, I do consider myself one. There are plenty of serious issues facing men, across the board, that need to be addressed by society but either aren't or are actively mocked. The lack of reproductive rights our disposability in the workplace and as soldiers the utter lack of serious mental health programs geared towards men in general but especially veterans gender bias in the family courts and in prison sentence lengths the extremely negative attitudes towards and criminalization of male sexual…
/r/MensRights27/01/17 07:57 AM
1

I think the level of discourse needs to be higher. When I hear feminists use tired, incorrect arguments about why men don't have any issues, it doesn't make me feel more charitable towards them or want to support them. And I think that's what this linked opinion piece essentially does. It doesn't argue against something the right way, using facts and presenting the issue honestly. All that does is make people who don't like the men's rights movement feel even better about thinking every MRA is a…
/r/MensRights27/01/17 07:35 AM
1

I was trying to respond to the points made in the link, so I limited my response. Heck, it was long enough as is. Give me an example of a big issue that was brought up that you would like a response to or an equivalent women's issue
/r/MensRights27/01/17 07:21 AM
-2

Right, and that decades old comment had exactly what to do with this situation right now? Millions of women protested the president because of his demonstrated intentions to introduce policies that make their lives harder and potential unsafe. This thread links to a poorly written article written by a guy who seemingly refuses to acknowledge the existence of any legitimate issues facing women today. I wrote a response saying the guy did a poor job of making a case for his opinion. And here you a…
/r/MensRights27/01/17 07:00 AM
4

I'm gynocentric because I acknowledge facts and called out a lazy, poorly supported piece of writing? I've got no problem with criticizing some of the things women or feminists say. But it should at least make sense and not just attack the issue because it's about women. Like I said at the end of my post, this isn't an either/or situation. Women have some valid issues. I don't have to argue against that just because I'm a guy.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 06:44 AM
6

I would love for you to point out where I made the claim that tampons are more important than a human life. I think you'd be pretty hard pressed to find a feminist quote for that. Once again, just because we have an issue that is potentially much more serious, does not invalidate the existence of one of their issues.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 01:24 AM
87

You minimize the claim in the same way the author does. Someone somewhere else has a claim to a larger issue, therefore, you don't get to complain about your smaller issue. No one is making the claim that this issue is the biggest issue. It is, however, part of the larger women's healthcare issue with is directly being compromised by the agenda of the new administration and as part of that, is a valid point.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 08:04 PM
718

Mens issues aren't addressed adequately, but articles like this will not help anyone take the movement seriously. He makes an absolute comparison between western women and women in states that all would agree are dealing with overt, state-sponsored oppression. The handful of examples he gives are oppression. They are not the sum-total list of all possible forms of oppression. By setting up this list, he attempts to invalidate the whole protest He makes vague claims about what possible reasons th…
/r/MensRights26/01/17 07:32 PM
1

I wasn't in any way trying to advocate for him, just clarify.
/r/MensRights17/01/17 12:43 PM
1

He's saying that he wants women to have the same lack of options that men have. If the only way to guarantee that you don't have a kid is to be abstinent, then both sexes should have that rule. I think that's what he meant
/r/MensRights17/01/17 02:10 AM
2

he was over the age of consent, she was under The article said that he was 16 at the time of the incident.
/r/MensRights16/12/16 12:36 PM
6

That oiled up dude from the Olympic opening ceremony this year? He was on the today show and the female anchors very, VERY, awkwardly applied oil to his upper body.
/r/MensRights05/11/16 10:27 PM
31

I've got a pretty strong sex drive, but on the uncommon occasion when I've told significant others I didn't feel like having sex at the moment, they got PISSED every time. Ditto. It turned into a whole conversation about her and reassuring her that I find her attractive and being there for her needs and how it makes her feel if I say no. Yeah, that's not at all setting me up for shaming if I ever say no again.
/r/MensRights17/09/16 01:09 PM
12

Right? Some sort of title 9 approach maybe?
/r/MensRights10/09/16 04:00 PM
8

I've told this to the last 4 people that called my home asking for Breast Cancer donations. Sorry, I think it's a horrible thing, my Grandmother died from it. But I won't contribute any money to its research when Prostate Cancer is so severely underfunded comparatively.
/r/MensRights03/07/16 08:16 PM
8

Couple had violent past Excuse me? Right? She had a history of assaulting him, but that apparently means that they had a violent past. What bullshit.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 02:04 PM
1

Your version of subtle and mine are subtly different.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 04:37 PM
5

Shit, it's really 30 years. They separated in the mid 80's according to the article. I agree. It's a joke that this wasn't immediately laughed out of court.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 03:03 PM
10

Ways men and women and unequal in reproduction, unless you want to solve these you do not believe in true equality as you're asking for: You say that he's using a strawman and then part of your reply boils down to "rewrite human biology"? That's pretty bullshit. Who the hell argues that men and women should have the same biological involvement in a pregnancy? Seriously, tell me because I've never seen someone argue that we can't have equality until that happens.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 11:49 AM
0

I'm not a fan of hers but what exactly does this have to do with men's rights? We don't have take some weird pleasure in the fact a feminist somewhere is having a bad day.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 05:05 AM
11

I am not sure if its relevant what name we give to it. Considering the extremely negative view towards it, the name probably does matter.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 06:10 PM
1

I looked it up and found this link which sums up nicely statues in all the states regarding the compensation for wrongfully imprisoned people. The actual laws set forth a pitful amount of compensation and often restrict the award based on future conduct or if the person pled guilty. The original link posted in the highest comment was from Washington, which has no statute, so the 500K he got was much more than he'd get in other states, like Wisconsin which caps at 25K no matter what. The only tim…
/r/MensRights30/09/14 05:27 PM
5

Are you honestly saying that we can't compare a man losing 10 years of actual freedom while he suffered in prison to a woman who was misidentified as a prostitute for a couple days? Courts put a dollar amount on their suffering, so yes, we will compare it. Comparing this to a person's salary for their job is actually comparing apples to oranges. Comparing this to the Mcdonald's coffee case, is actually a great example, even though you're clearly misinformed about the case. The woman was legitima…
/r/MensRights29/09/14 04:46 PM
6

I'll remove the gender from this so that it hopefully makes sense. A person is having an affair and breaking their marital vows. Their partner, a person with a good job and no children to support, is purposely staying in the relationship when they clearly hate the other person in order to maximize the revenge they can take financially on the other person by leveraging divorce laws against them. The coldblooded malice of the actions being taken, referring to the a cheating spouse as a non-human; …
/r/MensRights30/08/14 07:31 PM
11

Shut your mouth, bro. ugh, what a twat. If someone takes that tone immediately, I find it's best to just click the back button.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 02:18 PM
-1

You don't think there's any reason why women would create a subreddit to talk about woman specific issues to primarily other women? let me flip your comment a bit. Atheists who would go out of their way to join a sub that, by it's very premise, is meant to discriminate by religious belief, wouldn't typically be the type of atheists who are reasonable or fair minded. There is no reason for a /atheism or a /debateanatheist to exist, their entire premise is that they prioritize atheists(or opinions…
/r/MensRights13/07/14 02:14 PM
3

Lawyer up. See what would count as admissible evidence in court and get someone to record it or get her to talk about it more. At the very least you could have your record expunged. And if it goes well, she could be prosecuted or be liable civilly for this. Don't just vent, you have a chance to fix some things here.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 04:29 PM
2

Don't worry about it man, that user banned me from another subreddit because I followed a link to a story there from this board. No fighting, no off topic posts, just didn't like that I came from a mensrights crosspost. Apparently making a single post that follows reddiquette is considered 'brigading' if you come from here. Oh well, I'll try hard to control my tears.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 04:35 AM
1

No one should be forced to be a parent if they don't want to be.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 10:17 AM
3

It's still really good. They've kept it interesting the entire time.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 05:06 AM
9

Yeah, I've seen this in grad school for a certain science field. The field was split fairly clearly between lab and field work and gender followed that split too. Almost all the people studying for lab work were women and for field work, men. I was one of 3 guys studying lab work out of 40 students. Believe me, there were plenty of sexist rationalizations and comments from the women. "Guys just aren't as good at this type of work." or "Girls are better at detail oriented things." Heck, I got "yo…
/r/MensRights08/04/14 05:34 PM
1

Look up the case. You're wrong on this one.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 05:51 AM
18

At least he mentioned that we need to look at the gaps that men face in life expectancy, education, and workplace deaths. If he hadn't taken the time to mention that, it would have seemed not only misinformed but one-sided as well. /s
/r/MensRights29/01/14 11:43 AM
7

Glass Cellar is my favorite.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 11:37 AM
2

How many zeroes is too many when suing the everliving fuck out of this police department? 9? 10?
/r/MensRights23/01/14 04:03 AM
11

She did a good job of shoehorning in as much bullshit as possible. She even got the 1 in 4 "statistic" in there at the end. Nice.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 04:38 PM
68

I liked this quote from that first link: Blogger Ashley Ashbee, who calls Movember a type of “slacktivism,” puts it perfectly when asking participants, “Does your moustache share information about the importance of screening, or where to get screened? Does it tell you how you can prevent prostate cancer (if you even can)? Does it tell you the symptoms? Does it tell you who’s affected?” That's an interesting standard to hold it to. How many pink ribbons have that info written on the back of them?…
/r/MensRights01/12/13 12:47 PM
7

I love how they ignore the absolute numbers entirely. They follow this paragraph: Among white, middle-aged men, the rate has jumped by more than 50 percent, according to a Newsweek analysis of the public data. If these guys were to create a breakaway territory, it would have the highest suicide rate in the world. In wealthy countries, suicide is the leading cause of death for men in their 40s, a top-five killer of men in their 50s, and the burden of suicide has increased by double digits in both…
/r/MensRights14/11/13 11:48 AM
3

I have a problem in general with telling on some one because that is a child's way of handing things and says you cannot handle it. I actually think the same thing of violence when you're not already being physically attacked.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 05:15 PM
3

Right, because that's totally the same as a private citizen assaulting someone? Clearly, there are defined roles where people are told and trained to use violence. I was not talking about that. The point is that Martin is getting negative comments because he didn't "man up" and hit Incognito or something else. If you think it's acceptable to hit someone to defend yourself, fine. I'm not saying that we shouldn't be able to defend ourselves or stand up for ourselves. But calling a man weak or comp…
/r/MensRights05/11/13 03:34 PM
16

God forbid a man handle a situation without resorting to violence, right? That attitude is why this story is being discussed here and not in r/sports. The fact that you and many people that the writer of the article spoke to resorted to this line of reasoning is the problem.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 01:59 PM
4

this sounds like the same story as that video that was submitted a little while ago of a guy taping his talk with CPS workers. i'm going to look for it. edit: here we go. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1m1zhu/cps_interrogates_a_father_and_accuses_him_of/ both use the same language regarding the pills that the daughter was given by the mother
/r/MensRights01/10/13 12:18 PM
4

The zero sum game idea always strikes me as weird. Most of the time, you'll see an MRA point for some issue and it's construed as men wanting to take away a woman's right in the same issue. It's not a zero sum game and the fact that they take it as such is probably a good part of the reason why men have something to complain about. We're not looking to take their rights away so we can have them back. We want everyone to have the same rights and options. Maybe part of the problem is that they loo…
/r/MensRights27/09/13 01:22 PM
4

If a woman committed suicide by cop after losing custody, the nation would collectively shit itself in outrage and concern. A man does it and people comment on the story with concern for the "mother".
/r/MensRights24/09/13 01:15 PM
5

and she had the balls to cover up and tell him not to look at her. Hilarious.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 12:26 PM
39

This just in: Selfish assholes will use whatever justification they can find to feel better about their behavior.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 03:07 PM
2

And he got called out for a bullshit post by several people. Do you see the whole subreddit standing behind him? I guess what I was really asking was: are there any groups of MRA that espouse the views that most feminists say that all MRAs have? I'm not talking about the random assholes that exist in a mostly normal group. I'm looking for a group of actual hateful misogynists. Like the video. The woman with the hateful signs was up on stage surrounded by a crowd of people who appeared to have no…
/r/MensRights06/08/13 04:34 AM
42

I love the sign that the girl on the right is holding up here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CRWff4gCwTw&feature=player_detailpage&t=49 MRA's say women are dogs that need to be trained. Does anyone have a link to a bad MRA group filled with actual shitheads? Maybe I'm spoiled by r/MensRights, but I've never seen any MRA make the arguments that feminists say they do.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 01:05 PM
37

Ditto. I am shocked at how fucked up the response there is.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 05:35 AM
23

Whoever wrote that has clearly never been in a relationship with a woman.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 03:06 AM
27

I wouldn't call them my friends, but I've always loved riding on the subway.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 11:55 PM
1

I actually just saw Giant running a donation campaign for Prostate cancer recently. That was the only time I've ever seen any business do an event for it.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 02:11 PM
6

nevermind that one comment, the whole post and comment thread there is nuts. the only thing men are good for is impregnation. in mens case, its really true. the evidence that they are good for nothing is that they have destroyed the entire world and everything they do is stupid, violent or wrong. wow, just... wow.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 04:25 PM
44

Ooh, 'glass cellar', I really like that.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 02:40 PM
1

Yeah, saw those too. There are plenty of fucked over fathers that would love to debate them regarding the institutional enforcement of misandry. Their lack of bias is hilarious.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 03:34 PM
8

I wish I had to imagine, but I don't. We've read the pages of links showing exactly how men are treated in this situation. The "nothing illegal" quote blows my mind.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 08:11 PM
2

Yes, men can get breast cancer. It's a very small percentage of reported cases but it does happen.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 12:35 PM
3

I'd also support topless women highlighting prostate cancer. :) Love to see how they'd film that.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 12:34 PM
3

If she's so concerned with people trying to prevent effective AIDS prevention in Africa, I'm sure she's already written repeated about the Catholic Church's deadly stance on condoms.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 11:20 AM
7

The double standard is that if anything has impaired the judgement of the woman in the slightest, then she wasn't able to fully consent and it was rape.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 08:50 PM
2

Better yet, if both people are drunk, its still the man who is blamed, as if alcohol only removes consent from women.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 06:07 PM
0

For everyone involved, I think it's a lot simpler that the result of her stupidity is a youtube video and some embarrassment.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 12:36 PM
0

I'm glad she ran into those guys and not someone who would have taken her up on it.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 02:06 AM
3

molecular biology
/r/MensRights11/10/12 10:48 AM
5

very weird. I walked into my first class in grad school and I was one of 3 male students out of 30.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 04:40 AM
2

Absolutely, that's why I specifically said "lied about the circumstances of the sex they were having". The other person lied about something pertaining directly to the sex itself and its consequences. You might make an argument that when kids are eventually involved, money is a consideration, but you'd probably also agree that lying about your job and finances are not quite the same as lying about whether you have STDs, are on birth control, or if the condom is intact.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 08:22 PM
36

Shit, his partner lied about the circumstances of the sex they were having and once he knew the truth, he would have never done it in the first place. If he was a female, they'd tell him he was raped.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 01:53 PM
0

That's what you got from that book? That the all the men there were just a bunch of dumb white knights duped into protecting the women?
/r/MensRights28/09/12 03:22 AM
2

I was trying to very, very gently say what you did.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 09:13 PM
0

It just doesn't seem like much of an advantage when balanced with the risks. They even said in the article that it's not a large effect. If the net harm and good it causes are basically equal, it's probably not a great idea to force everyone to do it; which is basically what the article said.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 08:43 PM
0

What is there to get worked up over on this? Still, "the degree of benefit is modest enough that you don't have to say everyone has to do it," Freedman said. "It's not like wearing a seatbelt vs. not wearing a seat belt." The entire cost/benefit issue is equal enough that there isn't a general outright medical reason to do it. They're not saying anything new.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 07:18 PM
1

I'm going to grab a couple quotes from the article. A leading organization of pediatricians says the medical benefits of male circumcision outweigh the risks, but they're not enough to recommend the controversial procedure be performed on all baby boys. and Circumcision decisions should be left to parents after weighing up-to-date advice from their doctor and their own preferences and beliefs, the task force concluded. and Still, "the degree of benefit is modest enough that you don't have to say…
/r/MensRights27/08/12 07:16 PM
5

"Men shouldn't feel pleasure from sex because god says so." That was sorta one of the reasons that circumcision got so prevalent in the first place. It was done to discourage masturbation as well as a "treatment" for a whole bunch of stuff that doesn't really have anything to do with your dick. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_male_circumcision#Male_circumcision_to_prevent_masturbation
/r/MensRights27/08/12 07:04 PM
3

I can't ever remember seeing an ad for supporting breast cancer research that ever mentioned helping men too. I'm sure you'll be able to find one searching, but on tv or looking at those "walk for life" events, I can't remember seeing men mentioned at all. I will take care to look for this going forward.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 02:09 PM
2

Right, because there's no way of respectfully informing someone of why you're not giving them a donation.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 09:20 AM
7

You ever want to make a someone uncomfortable on the phone? Tell an operator calling you for a donation to breast cancer research that you're not donating because of the disparity between funding for for breast and prostate cancer.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 04:27 AM
28

Scumbag SRS Calls you a Hate Group Forms a Hate Group against you.
/r/MensRights11/08/12 09:49 PM
1

Kudos on the title. I was fooled and thought, "wow, that's actually a proper reasonable response to the... oh."
/r/MensRights07/07/12 04:45 AM
21

You really want to start a fight? Post the opposite picture on Mother's Day next year.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 05:37 PM
3

unless it's extreme on either end, height isn't really a factor for women. Granted, they've got a whole boatload of stuff to worry about but for 90% of them, height isn't one of them. That's why it's different for men. Average in the US is 5'10". I've heard girlfriends and other women call men that were any amount under that "short", in a negative way. Hell, I've had a girlfriend call a guy short who was 2 inches taller than me. Height is a big deal. Hell, I'd rather be 6'2" and a little overwei…
/r/MensRights09/06/12 03:17 AM
11

I've had a group of women friends actively have a discussion around me about how they'd never date a guy who was even their own height, he had to be taller. They were a range of heights, some a little taller than me, I'm 5'7". And I just sat there listening and none of them even thought about how they were talking. I called attention to it by saying, "yeah, fuck short guys. Who do they think they are?" They all laughed and gave a joking apology about it but they were all dead serious that they w…
/r/MensRights08/06/12 07:19 PM
3

He's the perfect human. Tall = perfect.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 07:15 PM
6

That's a good point you make. Because TALL is associated with all these positive traits, if you don't live up to that expectation, you're probably treated more harshly than if you were shorter.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 07:14 PM
5

Probably not the reason he can't find a job, but it is a reason for not earning as much
/r/MensRights08/06/12 07:10 PM
4

I think that car companies and health insurance companies probably do have good data on the millions of people that are forced to buy their services by the government. I'd have no problem paying more for services if I was in a high risk group as look as that designation was correctly applied to other groups as well and not withheld due to political correctness. Charging for more risk is fine, as long as it's fairly applied.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 06:15 PM
1

At the very least, civil court. Take her for every cent she has left. And then go after the state.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 10:43 AM
10

Wow, that's a really well-thought-out point about the whole issue.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 04:49 PM
47

Absolutely. It's just the complete acceptance of this behavior as perfectly normal and something to be applauded that really gets me.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 04:44 PM
257

The whole "destroy your ex's belongings" thing makes me more angry than a lot of other issues. I know it's not the worst thing a woman can do by a longshot, but rarely do I see one as celebrated openly by nearly all women as this. How many songs have been written about destroying a man's possessions as punishment? And anytime I express this opinion to a woman, it's laughed off and considered perfectly fine.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 03:55 PM
9

And never act like the order is over until you see court paperwork that says so. The baby momma in this story lied and said she got it taken off.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 04:49 AM
1

The question was who is getting the better deal, and maybe to analyze what that deal is. Sorry, I wasn't really thinking of it like that. I was treating as two people mutually deciding on what the most effective allocation of resources was. I firmly believe that if a couple should take everything into account and not just say that the man is an atm. If both people agree that they should both share in the financial and domestic responsibilities as opposed to one person handling one or the other, …
/r/MensRights15/02/12 04:01 AM
1

It is complicated and you make some very good points. I'm not really sure how to respond: which is, I suppose, the hallmark of an interesting question like this one.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 03:49 AM
1

If two consenting adults choose to arrange their lives in that manner, then who cares? If one of them wants to take care of the home and kids primarily while the other earns money, that's their choice. Should we disabuse women of the notion that this is all men are good for? Absolutely, but that we can't disallow the arrangement, in either direction.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 05:56 PM
3

Sorry, I wasn't really clear there. I was saying that, generally, choosing to not strive for a career is a valid choice. You can choose to bounce around until you meet someone to take care of you. If they're cool with that, fine. I see how it looks but I didn't mean to say that it's okay for people to waste tens of thousands of dollars on a career path that you'll abandon at the drop of a hat. Sorry about that. On the flip side, though, if the parents pay for schooling with the expectation that …
/r/MensRights14/02/12 03:45 PM
2

if that.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 03:23 PM
9

I don't think that it's society doing all of this. She doesn't address at all that women self-select to not be ambitious for a career. I know this is an anecdote, but all the women I was friends with in grad school were driven and very smart. And almost all of them were spending all this time and money on education and the beginning of a career as basically something to take up their time until they found a husband and could be a stay at home mom. I just don't think that society should take the …
/r/MensRights14/02/12 01:04 PM
3

I'm not seeing a problem here. The whole point was to be absurd in order to point out what a terrible idea the ultrasound amendment is. It's like that bill requiring drug tests for lawmakers as well as welfare recipients.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 01:29 PM
7

You should let your lawyer know about this. Maybe you can force her to get treatment? Aside from doing it for her sake, perhaps if there is something there that should be treated, it might help with her behavior towards not only you but the kids.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 02:30 PM
6

good luck getting that approved.
/r/MensRights20/01/12 07:14 PM
2

I didn't think that the Penn State riot could be topped. I stand corrected.
/r/MensRights22/11/11 05:04 AM
2

exactly what I thought too. What a simple way to get rid of her.
/r/MensRights17/08/11 02:52 PM
1

I would agree with them too. Rape victims need to be protected from their attackers.
/r/MensRights17/08/11 01:27 AM
26

It's the same logic but I think all of us here would doubt that would ever happen. There would be new laws written yesterday to protect a woman from that scenario if it arose.
/r/MensRights16/08/11 03:50 PM
16

Also, I guess men can't rape their wives because they've had consensual sex up until then.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 05:09 AM
6

on youtube That's all we needed to know.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 05:08 AM
7

I don't know how those insurance workers that deny claims and life saving tests and treatments sleep at night. They probably do it because they don't want to lose their health insurance.
/r/MensRights06/08/11 12:19 PM
5

I'm glad our comments have amused you and you've got the reaction that you came for.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 03:23 PM
6

Thanks for the not so thinly veiled insulting comment on link 1. Though, considering the post itself, it's not exactly unexpected. I'm glad something happened on the internet today that allowed you to feel good about whatever little chip you have on your shoulder for this subreddit and its members. Congrats!
/r/MensRights28/07/11 03:14 PM
3

Even if the course isn't male only, males are given priority in tee times 6 days a week. I caddied for nearly a decade and several courses and all were like this, and any other courses my friends had worked at as well. For example, all the ones I worked at had a "Ladies' Day" where only women were allowed to play. In reality, it was only really one morning. Come afternoon, men were allowed to play as well. The entire rest of the week, 99% of the time, every player was a man. The only women I did…
/r/MensRights11/06/11 06:19 PM
2

Why would any sane man take the risk of being a teacher with the threat of this hanging over their head?
/r/MensRights15/05/11 09:18 PM
17

Sorry, baby. I have to videotape us. It's the law.
/r/MensRights19/04/11 02:44 AM
4

Depends on the field. I'm seeing a lot of biology lab jobs filled with women. Case in point, the Forensic Science grad program I went through was about 90% women for the lab work. Only when it was evidence collection, firearms or photography were there an equal number of men present. At lab where I work, the vast majority of employees are women and all the labs around here are like that. And yes, their behavior was similar to the article. There were one or two guys who were typical douches and t…
/r/MensRights17/04/11 12:55 AM
6

Personality goes a long way...
/r/MensRights28/02/11 07:22 PM
8

I like the part where she only wants them to stop beating the shit out of the guy so that her son isn't traumatized.
/r/MensRights02/02/11 05:48 AM
19

Replace her with a guy. If you knocked a guy out for doing this stuff to you, the judge wouldn't even blink before ruling in your favor. The law would be behind you too. But because it's a woman, I have to say that this guy did the right thing because right now, he's not in jail.
/r/MensRights22/10/10 10:36 PM
1

good for you!
/r/MensRights15/09/10 03:40 AM
3

Seriously... what gives guys? Howabout, I'd rather not have something done to me or my son that could disfigure them mentally and physically simply because someone thinks that it might help prevent an STI. I mean, it's not like you're supposed to be wearing some sort of protective covering over your penis during sex that works way better than cutting part of your dick off. Oh wait... Check out the links here that specifically talk about challenging the results of the studies that did show a redu…
/r/MensRights15/09/10 03:31 AM
2

What do you think would be the impact on our society if we added a 'male abortion' of sorts? Simply saying that we already have one parent households really isn't sufficient because you would have to suspect that the availability of the male abortion would open the floodgates and drastically increase the number of single, unwed mothers out there by an extremely significant number. Especially because men would no longer have a reason to wear condoms or pull out anymore. Instead some may go out an…
/r/MensRights16/06/10 11:54 AM
1

She should have added an Irony tag to her post right next to the * Hypocrisy & Bigotry* tag.
/r/MensRights18/12/09 04:16 PM
13

Somehow I feel that if the genders were reversed, the outcome would have been different.
/r/MensRights15/12/09 04:47 PM
2

I replying that way to show you the error of your logic. I do not advocate taking away any rights of women to their own reproduction. I just think you and others with your argument care nothing for the reproductive rights, or rather the lack thereof, of the other gender involved in reproduction.
/r/MensRights15/12/09 04:17 PM
2

Men and women aren't entirely equal. Women get pregnant, men don't. That's life and if you can't deal with it, never have sex with women. Abortion should be illegal except for the most extreme cases of a threat to the woman's life from the baby. Women get pregnant, men don't. That's life and if you can't deal with it, never have sex with a man.
/r/MensRights14/12/09 03:11 PM
4

Dude made a billion dollars from golf. 'nuff said.
/r/MensRights11/12/09 04:59 PM
5

He absolutely does. I can't wait for it all to come to a head. I don't think Puck will stand by the sidelines forever. Her and Puck seem to make a nicer couple anyway. Plus, I don't think Finn is ready for fatherhood. He is a little stupid sometimes.
/r/MensRights13/11/09 05:06 AM
15

The pregnant girl is quite the bitch. Her actions are in no way portrayed as the right thing to do. She's said that she's saying that Finn is the father because she would be humiliated for cheating on him and feels that he is the better man to be with in the long term as he has the best chances in her mind of getting out of their small town and making a real life. She's a scared little girl afraid of losing the few things that keep her self esteem up, afraid of being trapped in small town hell a…
/r/MensRights12/11/09 06:08 PM
5

Joking aside, that is a very good point. This emotional abuse runs both ways and indeed, there are plenty of females (and males) out there that do not engage in this behavior.
/r/MensRights20/10/09 04:45 PM
2

Damn, I was about to post this. It's hardly "brainwashing" when that's how they actually act all the time.
/r/MensRights20/10/09 04:21 PM
3

The problem you're ignoring is that men are often forced to take responsibility for others actions against their will. If the man doesn't want children and the woman agree but lies or later changes his mind, there is nothing he can do about it to protect himself. Nothing. He has no legal right to force an abortion or abdicate any financial obligations if he never wanted a child in the first place. Hell, the woman could sleep with another man and force the first one to pay child support. But the …
/r/MensRights05/10/09 04:21 PM
2

Coed Softball is the same. In my league this year, guys had to bat from the opposite side of the plate. Also, if you walked a guy, he got 2nd base to penalize teams from intentionally walking. Of course, almost no team has a pitcher good enough to pitch a strike out consistently, so walks were a big scoring tool.
/r/MensRights10/09/09 02:11 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter