TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

EvilGamerKitty Archive

View 0 posts and 71 comments by EvilGamerKitty on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Unfortunately, you do have to have this talk with your son, because if he does physically retaliate, he's going to get the cops called on him.
/r/MensRights27/03/10 04:10 PM
1

That seems to be the more typical form of body dismorphia among males. Probably because "men are big and muscular" and "women are small and willowy". Bah.
/r/MensRights21/03/10 10:52 PM
2

I mean niche group as in groups that are not solely concerned with equality for everyone. Niche as in "everyone but the humanists". As far as I can tell, MR in general accepts gay men. There's no problem with gay men being a part of MR. Gay men can find just as much support as straight men here, should either of them have issues with gender discrimination.
/r/MensRights19/03/10 04:47 AM
1

Right now, men's rights doesn't really seem to have another niche group that is willing to offer it support. Other groups see men's rights as a non-issue, usually citing things like "the patriarchy" or saying "straight white guys have it all, you don't need any help!" So you suggest that men's rights go out of their way to support issues that have nothing to do with gender? I think that the fight right now is about whether or not the movement even should exist. Until they gain legitimacy there, …
/r/MensRights19/03/10 04:31 AM
1

I expect it to be applicable to approximately 50% of the population, and even more if you consider people who are affected by the issues of men in their lives. Look, men's rights is in its infancy. When gay men are discriminated against, they already have an established movement that is there to advocate for them. I expect that's why the LGBT movement leaned on feminism heavily to start with. Feminism was stronger than them, so they used feminism's support. Men's rights is hardly even recognized…
/r/MensRights19/03/10 04:12 AM
6

I have yet to see any MR posts dealing with that. Then maybe you should submit this kind of content.
/r/MensRights19/03/10 04:03 AM
0

I don't expect people to support issues that don't affect them, generally.
/r/MensRights19/03/10 03:53 AM
5

If a man is facing an issue that hinges on whether or not he is a man, then it is men's rights, no matter what his sexual orientation is. For instance: gay man wants to teach elementary school. A female applicant that is less qualified, not as good with children, etc. is hired instead of him, because "all men are child molesters". (It's not usually as obvious as that, but you get the gist.) That is men's rights. However, if two gay men want to get married, and they can't do that, it isn't really…
/r/MensRights19/03/10 01:29 AM
8

If they are finding unequal treatment because they are a man, that is men's rights. If they are finding unequal treatment because they fuck men, that is gay rights. Now, there's some overlap in there, I'm sure, but that seems to be the skinny on the situation.
/r/MensRights18/03/10 10:05 PM
8

If you can point out the difference between removing the foreskin and removing the clitoral hood, then by all means, do so. Also, that you are a man is irrelevant to this discussion, since that does not make you a spokesperson for all men.
/r/MensRights17/03/10 05:36 PM
9

It is men's rights. If you were to perform an exactly analogous surgery on a female, that would be FGM. Perform the same surgery on a baby boy, and that's "normal". That's a double standard, and men seem to be getting the short end of the stick.
/r/MensRights17/03/10 05:27 PM
8

Someone once told me that when two people are drunk, the man is the rapist because he's the one doing all the thrusting. I asked them who the rapist was if the woman was on top. I did not receive a response.
/r/MensRights10/03/10 06:21 PM
25

My outrage is more about the disparity between the genders. A 14 year old girl having sex with a teacher over 30 is being molested, but a 14 year old boy in the same situation is lucky. Why can't people admit that it could be either one, and that goes for both genders?
/r/MensRights10/03/10 05:16 PM
11

I think there's also the belief that a "real man" would be able to stop a woman from having sex with him. After all, he "should" be bigger and stronger.
/r/MensRights10/03/10 05:10 PM
3

Those are actually quotes from two different people. The first is from a detective, and the second is from the judge.
/r/MensRights27/02/10 04:21 AM
0

I agree completely. If you yourself are not using a form of birth control, any child that results gets you no sympathy from me.
/r/MensRights24/02/10 08:26 PM
2

I don't see any reason to think men will be less forgetful, either, and plenty of women forget the pill. Good on you for never forgetting it, but other people aren't that good at doing something at the same time every day.
/r/MensRights23/02/10 03:13 AM
9

Part of me wishes that you punched her the fuck out... in the end, your method was better, though. Kudos to you for taking the higher road.
/r/MensRights22/02/10 01:19 AM
5

Honestly, I don't give a shit if it's real or not. Is it seen as "normal" today? No? Then it doesn't affect me. Why can't people realize that the world today is not the same as the world 40 years ago, or even 150 years ago? Why do we need to bring up shit that that happened then as if it affects individuals today? It just doesn't. The End.
/r/MensRights15/02/10 01:13 AM
6

Actually, in both of your examples, people would call you an addict. There is a theory about carb addition floating around out there. It's true, other people only care about your addition if they find it offensive. But you should care about your own addiction if it interferes with your life and you can't stop. That's the line between enjoyment and addiction. When it interferes with other parts of your life and you are unable to control yourself, you're an addict.
/r/MensRights14/02/10 08:51 PM
3

That's a pretty good use of a cantrip right there.
/r/MensRights13/02/10 05:20 PM
7

The crux of most anti-circumcision arguments is that it is not the parents' right to modify their child's genitals. We don't let parents amputate a fingertip off their baby. We don't let them give their son a Prince Albert. But right now, we allow them to remove a piece of their child's penis. An exactly analogous procedure on a female, removal of the clitoral hood, is seen as barbaric even when done to older children. Why are baby boys different?
/r/MensRights12/02/10 03:15 PM
17

Just to preempt any outcries, the bill DOES allow for genital "changes" if the person is able to legally consent or in "immediate medical need with no less-destructive alternative treatment available". So no one's taken away the right of any man or woman over 18 to cut up their genitals all they want. Yay freedom!
/r/MensRights12/02/10 08:16 AM
4

Right, but in this case you were infringing on the right for the store to decide they don't want to serve him. They get to do that. It is not your right to demand service of any business.
/r/MensRights11/02/10 08:01 PM
1

Well, now we're getting less into gender issues and more into "societal problems". I'm pretty much with you on that, though. Plus, adoption is a lot more emotional than most people believe it to be. Biology wants a woman to love her baby unconditionally, whether she has decided to give it away or not.
/r/MensRights11/02/10 09:29 AM
1

First thing I noticed here was my typo. =P Now I feel like a putz. Anywho, I was mostly reacting to the fact that child support was being equated to abortion. No matter how you slice it, they are not even remotely the same action, and it would be a bad thing for this community to head in that direction. I'm of the opinion that the male should be able to give the child up for "adoption" to its mother. Now, I also believe there should be some consequences for this, so as not to take the decision l…
/r/MensRights11/02/10 09:23 AM
7

Technically, yes. But I would not advocate that anyone (male or female) do this without their partner's consent. Unless, of course, it would be hilarious.
/r/MensRights10/02/10 08:36 PM
2

Well, if she actually feels like having sex, she might not be taking it. Fake edit: this is a joke, because one of the side effects of taking hormones can be reduced libido. I always found that amusing.
/r/MensRights10/02/10 08:13 PM
4

If the solution involves removing the child from both parents, then both parents have to agree on it. If the mother wants the child but the father wants nothing to do with it, he should be able to give it up for "adoption" to the mother, with the idea that if he tries to be in contact with either of them before the kid is 18, there are repercussions because he gave up 100% of his parental rights. If the mother gets the kid during the week and Dad only gets him on the weekends, then Mom should be…
/r/MensRights10/02/10 08:03 PM
2

I agree with that. But you equated a man being forced to fork over money and a woman being forced to undergo surgery. It is not equal. I apologize for using that to assume that you would be for a man being able to terminate without his partner's agreement. I see that too often, and I did a little mental leap here. For the record, I don't think anyone should be able to terminate a pregnancy without agreement from the partner (with some exceptions for if the partner has skipped town, so to speak).
/r/MensRights10/02/10 06:47 PM
2

Under safe haven laws in almost all states, the father can give the child up as well. There are only four states that specifically say it must be the mother. If a safe haven location not in those four states doesn't let a father leave his child there, they do not do so with the backing of their government. Other than that, I agree with everything else you've said. Let the father give up the child to the mother, as if it is an adoption. Maybe include something like a restraining order until the c…
/r/MensRights10/02/10 06:36 PM
2

Even a broken clock is right twice a day. ;)
/r/MensRights10/02/10 06:29 PM
4

Men can get dragged into paying child support. How is that any different? It's not a medical prodecure that risks your life. Yes, child support for a kid you never wanted sucks your life and livelihood away, and something needs to change so that doesn't happen. But if you want more rights, and answer is not to take away the rights of others. I see that decried here all the time when it's a feminist that says it. Why is it OK when a man wants to do it instead?
/r/MensRights10/02/10 06:24 PM
2

I think it's still better than staying with an abuser. I agree, the legal system is set up so that a man trying to escape is "at fault", but I can't imagine that living with someone that beats you is any better than that.
/r/MensRights04/02/10 02:36 AM
11

Try to look to the cause. It’s possible that some women just don’t realize what they’re doing. Maybe they’ve been brought up in an environment where this kind of behavior is considered usual. Some people live their entire lives in an atmosphere of mutual combat on a regular basis – we’re talking about long-term marriages of many years. If that’s the kind of family she had growing up, perhaps she’d be willing to get some counseling, if she knows she’s causing harm to her husband or children. None…
/r/MensRights03/02/10 11:28 PM
4

In other articles that I've seen on this study (you've already been linked to it once here) they made an important connection that this article glosses over. They said that 1/3 of women who are victims of abuse have had their birth control sabotaged by their boyfriend. Now, I can see why a person who already exhibits control over their partner in a physical way would want to "trap" them with a child. It's not about wanting a baby, it's about wanting control (especially if you think your partner …
/r/MensRights01/02/10 11:59 PM
10

No, because women are the only ones that go to the doctor when they suspect a pregnancy, and the researcher is a doctor.
/r/MensRights26/01/10 10:50 PM
1

Yeah, I just really liked that one study I read, and didn't save the link for it. I thought it was amusing, because a feminist linked it to me to try and prove that the wage gap does exist, and the study she showed me pretty much said otherwise. It had some great visuals, too.
/r/MensRights25/01/10 10:47 PM
7

OK, female that has been in a technical field here. There is only one job I've ever had where I felt that being female was a factor in anything that happened in the workplace. That job, since it was a student position, was about 50% foreign students. The very little discrimination I got came from them. Also, studies that say that women earn 75% of what men do usually don't account for variables other than "sex" and "job description". Occasionally they include years of experience. They don't incl…
/r/MensRights25/01/10 10:04 PM
5

You're right. The problem isn't the words themselves. But there is a double standard surrounding them. The actions that make a woman a slut or a whore would make a man a player or a ladies-man. I think some people see the words as perpetuating the double standard. Edit: Yes, the double standard goes both ways, and yes, women perpetuate double standards just as much as men. OP specifically referenced "cunt," "whore," and "slut," which are commonly seen as words used for women. Please don't read a…
/r/MensRights24/01/10 02:50 PM
13

For protection with future women: any "agreement" that you have could easily get thrown out by a judge, since it will be "in the child's best interest" to get money from you. The only way I know of to prevent child support payments is to not conceive. The only effective method I know for that is to use birth control that you are responsible for. For men, the simplest solution is usually to wear a condom. For your situation now: it's possible she didn't intentionally try to trap you. For the sake…
/r/MensRights23/01/10 03:20 AM
9

I'm not really a fan of the argument that circumcised men get less pleasure than intact men. It's incredibly difficult to prove, and many circumcised men refuse to believe it anyway. Of course, it could be true, but it hasn't been an effective argument in my experience. That said, this article proved to me that circumcision is not "at worst, harmless." This pic is what did it for me. Honestly, that looks fucked up and painful. It's like the doctor was drunk when he did that. I look forward to th…
/r/MensRights22/01/10 04:59 AM
10

Funny, it reminds me of every romantic comedy I've ever heard of.
/r/MensRights18/01/10 06:10 AM
13

And to say that PUA's and MRA's have anything to do with eachother is very wrong. Totally agree. They are entirely different communities. The only similarity I see is that they are both made up of men. And honestly, if a PUA's deception is rape, then so is makeup, spanx, cosmetic surgery, and sexy clothes. After all, if that man knew what you looked like without it, he might not have had sex with you. One is saying what women "like to hear," and the other is presenting what men "like to see." Ne…
/r/MensRights17/01/10 02:34 AM
3

I am completely for my partner installing a urinal... as long as we also get a bidet. I figure as long as we're installing "unique" plumbing, we may as well go the whole nine yards.
/r/MensRights16/01/10 07:39 AM
1

I think it's pretty much all been said already, as far as advice. I'm so sorry you had to go through this. I really hope this gets resolved without marking up your record in any way. And please remember that not all females are like this. I'm sure some day you'll find a girl that's right for you... it's just obviously not this one.
/r/MensRights16/01/10 04:29 AM
11

Because boobies are cool! Didn't you get the memo?
/r/MensRights12/01/10 04:13 AM
2

Ask that of the innumerable females out there who chuck a tantrum when the man insists on using a condom, then employ their mind games and emotional manipulation to coerce him into abandoning the idea. Some time later — oops, I'm pregnant, honey! And the second she throws that hissy fit, you leave. She is not the kind of woman you want a relationship with anyway, because she is insane. And now that you're not having sex with her, she can't have your baby! I probably should have clarified, I don'…
/r/MensRights11/01/10 08:47 PM
4

As one of the commenters on r/equality mentioned, I would rather see "gender studies" than either "women's studies" or "men's studies", because a large part of society is how the two interact with each other. I could see studies of either gender being more of a focus within that department, rather than separate departments of their own. That said, this appears to be a step in the right direction for equality.
/r/MensRights11/01/10 08:15 PM
2

I don't see it that way. In my relationship, we use the pill and condoms together, because it's less likely to have a child that way, and it has nothing to do with trust. Sometimes a pill gets missed, or the condom breaks, or what have you, and in those cases, we've got a backup method going. I don't see how recognizing that your partner is human and can make mistakes will ruin your relationship.
/r/MensRights11/01/10 06:06 PM
2

It was a figure pulled out of my ass, based on the rest of my comment.
/r/MensRights10/01/10 11:26 PM
2

Look, I just took the original points made by KoNP and pointed out that they can be avoided without much more effort. I personally place my own well-being first. That is all I have suggested that others do. I do not condone birth control sabotage, and I do not blame men that fall victim to it. Everyone must do everything within their power to protect themselves, and if that means using your own condoms (even if your girlfriend is on birth control), then so be it. If she can't understand that you…
/r/MensRights10/01/10 11:22 PM
3

That is not what I'm saying. I'm saying that although some women do try to have a child without their partner's consent, most of these situations can be avoided with a little extra effort. I don't really understand your last sentence. If a woman deliberately sabotages birth control, then there is no loving relationship, no matter what the man is doing. In another comment here, I mentioned that my position here is more analogous to a man saying to a woman "you would decrease your chances of being…
/r/MensRights10/01/10 07:52 PM
7

I don't disagree with the majority of your points, and I'm not sure why you think I do. (The only thing I do disagree with is what happens from an accidental conception, and that's possibly a larger can of worms than what was originally being talked about.) I'm just saying that there are some ways that you can try to protect yourself from a woman trying to get pregnant without your consent. I don't see my argument as any different than a man saying to women "of course rape is never to be condone…
/r/MensRights10/01/10 05:49 AM
1

I certainly don't think they should be necessary, either. I also don't see my post as blaming men. I was pointing out that the situations that KoNP made can be avoided without too much effort. Really, I don't know if there should "blame" involved in the conception of a child (unless there was direct sabotage involved). In the end, if you have been having sex, you are responsible for any child that results. It's simply the mature thing to do, and it equally applies for both genders.
/r/MensRights10/01/10 05:04 AM
1

While I don't agree with oxamus, 9 times out of 10 the man is in charge of whether or not he fathers children. A woman can't poke holes if you keep the condoms on your person. If you use condoms, it matters much less whether or not she's on the pill. If she cheated, there's always DNA testing. As for the sperm donor issue, you could of course not donate, but I sincerely hope that the case you're talking about is a fluke. If it isn't, then for your own safety, you should never donate sperm. Of co…
/r/MensRights10/01/10 03:25 AM
2

Why do guys have to be included in this and why do they care? Because breast cancer can affect anyone. It is not a "female disease", though women are prone to it more often. Even if it did only affect women, that means that a man can lose his wife, girlfriend, aunt, mother, grandma, best friend, etc. Is it that hard for some people to understand?
/r/MensRights10/01/10 12:19 AM
2

I am of the opinion that, if you don't like fucking hugs from kids, then you shouldn't fucking work around them. I find your choice of expletive amusing.
/r/MensRights05/01/10 09:51 PM
3

Their study suggests that fetuses may have long term memory, which they admit is contradictory to current information. They also admit that their study doesn't show very strong statistical evidence to support their claim. And finally, the memory they refer to is habituation, which is implicit memory, not explicit memory. I'm not pro-circumcision, but the title does not accurately affect the study.
/r/MensRights25/12/09 03:15 AM
4

That was a really well written and thought out post. But... there was one sentence I take issue with. Look up "common-law" marriage, a law that allows a woman to force a man to marry her. Common-law marriage does no such thing. Here is a quote from the Law Encyclopedia. A common-law marriage has three basic features. When a common-law marriage is challenged, proof of the following elements is a critical consideration. A present agreement to be married. The parties must announce to each other tha…
/r/MensRights23/12/09 08:36 PM
3

through guilt-trips or nagging I think that's where the distinction is made. Your example doesn't use guilt or nagging (at least, I wouldn't see it that way as a female). If you kept asking over and over for twenty minutes, I suppose that could be nagging, but that would also mean you're an annoying boyfriend. =P
/r/MensRights23/12/09 07:10 PM
1

I didn't really give a shit... I would much rather have showered in front of other girls than stink all day.
/r/MensRights22/12/09 11:15 PM
1

Well, when I was in high school, we weren't allowed to shower after gym because "someone" might get embarrassed. Well "someone" did get embarrassed anyway. I had pretty bad B.O. as a teenager and was constantly made fun of for being smelly. Edited for clarity.
/r/MensRights22/12/09 10:59 PM
1

According to the lawsuit, Weiler and others are uncomfortable with the flimsy curtains on the shower doors and men using the toilets without closing the door. Apparently some disagree.
/r/MensRights22/12/09 10:37 PM
0

No, I don't think it's fair. Overall, I was expressing that I don't think women are given preferential treatment on a large scale (though it does still happen in some places) and that if your sentiment was true across the board, I would have a decent job right now.
/r/MensRights22/12/09 08:29 PM
6

There's only one problem there: no one but the potentially raped can tell you if there's trauma or not, and you can't argue with them.
/r/MensRights22/12/09 05:11 PM
5

Not rape, I agree, but still the sign of being a sucky person. Including when women do that very thing, with the implication that you're not "man enough" if you don't want to have sex 24/7.
/r/MensRights22/12/09 05:10 PM
1

I do look outside of the town I live in, up to about 1 hour's drive away. I have a somewhat new house and don't want to move away from my and my boyfriend's family, so moving isn't a good choice for me. I'm not starving to death, I'm not behind on the mortgage, I'm just jobless.
/r/MensRights22/12/09 04:37 PM
2

I'll buy that most women are sexually assaulted. I've been assaulted twice, and I'm only 22. Now, I wouldn't call either of those times a rape, and I didn't lose more than a night's sleep over them, as they were minor incidents. I postulate that most men are assaulted as well, but society tells them that the assault is "OK" because "they wanted it". Hmm, this sounds rather familiar, doesn't it?
/r/MensRights22/12/09 04:16 AM
-1

And thanks to affirmative action laws, if a woman applied, her application would go to the front of the line. There are times when I wish that was true in my town. Then, I'd have a job.
/r/MensRights22/12/09 02:15 AM
1

This isn't the way the law is going to work, of course, but as long as she had sex with anyone else during the approximate time of conception, she lied and therefore committed fraud. She told one man that he was definitely the father, when she could not know whether or not he was. She doesn't have to know who the father is, she just needs to know that there was more than one potential father.
/r/MensRights22/12/09 01:53 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter