TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Exact_Structure5053 Archive

View 0 posts and 106 comments by Exact_Structure5053 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I have seen these arguments said in this sub and in other places and they are really dumb arguments. My arguments on why paper abortions doesn't make sense is: 1) Men don't face any consequences of pregnancy. 2) I dont want to pay more taxes, then I already do, fixing another person's decision. 1) Men do not face any consequences of getting pregnant and in faxt benefit the most from that aspect as i will explain later. There are many things that can wrong with the pregnancy that can negatively a…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 02:49 PM
2

They should be able to if they didn't want to be parents in the first place and if the state/other person forced them to be one. First, i don't see any good reason why someone should be given this option. If you didn't want to be a parent then you shouldn't have sex or at least have safe sex. Secondly, someone's going to have to pay to raise the child. Children don't just grow on their own. Why should I have to pay more in taxes because someone choose not to be a parent?? That's not my responsib…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 02:31 PM
1

You said a lot of things that were wrong; it's not my fault you're not capable of a substantial response. Take some accountability and be better. Reply back if you have anything substantial to say other than "too many words."
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 03:55 PM
9

grown women who will continue to have children for men that they know ain’t worth nothing. Many of them don’t use birth control and keep the babies for men that abuse them, men who are bums, and men that cheat on them. Like I already said, single mothers tend to be poor, uneducated, and from a broken home. Who then have kids with poor, uneducated men who also come from a broken home. So this whole notion of "choices" is not as simple as you make it out to be because once again, these women aren'…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 12:56 PM
12

Then why they don't? Because women, like men, aren't these all-knowing clairvoyant robots. You keep going back to this notion of "choices." As if that's not all of life. if everyone knew what the right or better choices were, then life would obviously be simpler. the type of woman who is more at risk of being a single mother is most likely coming from a poor background, not very educated, and probably a broken home. The man she's most likely going to end up with is coming from a very similar bac…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 11:44 AM
18

Yeah, if only women were clairvoyant robots; none of this would happen to them. On one hand, men complain that women's standards are too high and on another that women should choose better. Also, single mothers already take accountability by being single mothers. The guy who is not actively raising his child and/or not paying child support is the one not taking any accountability. Sorry, but men aren't children.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 11:00 AM
22

No, men aren't the problem. Don't shift the blame. Try taking accountability Man, I've been on this sub for too long that I can't tell if you're purposely being ironic or if this is genuine.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 10:39 AM
1

Do you mean the consent talk that's required for all incoming freshmen? Doesnt matter if you are "super blue pilled feminists", that talk is a requirement to attend the university. I'm pretty sure that talk included examples of both men and women getting assaulted. I dont know why you are getting offended over it. It's like you guys just make up problems or heavily exaggerated existing examples just to complain about it. No one is going to take you guys seriously, especially if you're getting of…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 10:49 AM
6

Men are killed by the cops and in general more often than women I mean, couldn't this just be because men engage in more risky behavior and therefore tend to have more run-in with the cops? You bring up black on black crime later on, but the only reason for that is because black areas tend to experience more crime. So shouldn't the thing here for men to stop engaging in risky behavior. are subjected to harsher treatment at every stage of the criminal justice system, Hmmmmm, not every stage. The …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 09:50 AM
21

I don't see what child support has to do with autonomy. Child support is the responsibility of parents. Not of men or women. Even if we were to get rid of child support; all of us are going to have to foot the bill. So someone is going to have to pay; i don't see why it shouldn't be the parents. Secondly, the issue you seem to be having is that men can't get pregnant, so therefore, men cant face any physical or social ramifications of getting pregnant. So obviously, men aren't going to be given …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 09:33 AM
2

You literally just explained why she does have unique privileges. Yes, she has the same "unique privileges" as the previous two white male VPs, which were Mike Pence and Joe Biden. Maybe you and I have different understandings of what "unique" and "privileges" mean. I said she got nominated as the presidential candidate despite failing to even make it to the primaries last election. I can't tell if you're purposely trying to miss the point or if you genuinely just don't understand US politics. H…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/24 09:32 PM
6

She got picked as VP because of her race and gender, and now she's the nominee despite failing to even make it to the primaries last election. Bro, Obama literally chose Biden to help him with white democrat voters who were hesitant to vote for a black man. Before this, Biden lost in the Primaries twice. And now, he's President of the United States. Probably only because he was Obama's VP. Mike Pence was chosen to help Trump with white evangelical voters and white moderates. Mike Pence would go …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/24 09:29 AM
7

I don't know why we have to play these weird double speak games like we all don't know what you guys are implying when you say that Kamala is a DEI hire. Talk about gaslighting. You guys obviously aren't talking about diversity or equitable when referring to Kamala. You guys are clearly implying that she didn't deserve her position and that she could only skate by her race & sex and not by merits. Let's not mention the fact that choosing a VP is a political strategic choice. Obama chose Biden be…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/24 09:08 AM
8

I'm pretty sure it's more likely that the paternity test gets messed up than the hospital giving you the wrong kid. Let's not lie to ourselves. You are accusing her of cheating. That's just how it's going to come off as. Also, you get insurance so you don't have to pay as much for basic services if something goes wrong but you're not in a relationship with your insurance company. Do you get a test because you assume your partner is cheating or the hospital fucked up, or just in case? 9.9/10, it'…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 06:49 PM
3

Lol, bro, no one knows your life. For all we know; you could just be making all of this up. Especially since we don't have a her side of the story.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 04:58 PM
1

I love it when I beat you guys down to only one sentence responses. You can't even argue on the facts. Mind you, only one sex was allowed because of the military's discriminatory rules against women and female soldiers until Obama. And the process to change that, you said you didn't care for. Because all you guys seem to be good for is complaining all day on reddit and playing victim.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 04:16 PM
0

Because those "wars" were not true threats to the state and the military had the means to fight it with a volunteer army. And Vietnam was a threat to the state? We didn't need a draft in WW1 when Germany and her allies were already on the back foot. Bro, we were attacked on American soil on 9/11. America had a region wide war in the Middle East; including against the 4th largest military in the world. The fact that we didn't have a draft after 9/11 just proves that Congress doesn't do these thin…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 02:03 PM
2

Not might happen, it has happened. WW1, WW2, Vietnam It didn't happen after 9/11 and the numerous wars we've been in since then. Again, it's not discrimination if it might happen. With that logic, everything is discrimination because laws change. Cool, then women can come die by their millions along with mem. Lol, you think I disagree? First, I love the American viewpoint here. How many civilians died during WW1, WW2, and Vietnam? Pretty sure millions. It's just such an American viewpoint to be …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 01:02 AM
6

I dont see how this discrimination. Men can't get pregnant. Meaning they are not subject to the social or physical risks associated with pregnancy. That right there is a massive benefit for men, so I don't see how this is discrimination. No man has died from giving child birth, no man was discriminated against for being pregnant in the workplace, no man had to face the reality of becoming infertile due to something going wrong. Women given more options due to unique standards isn't discriminatio…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 02:00 PM
8

During times of war??? So men aren't being conscripted right now. I'm sorry, but it's not discrimination because something might happen or else everything is discrimination because laws may change in the future. There is something amusing though of men wanting women to be more traditional but also refusing the traditional "protector" role for men. Also, the great irony is that the military only drafts men because women were forbidden from combat roles and women were discriminated from higher pos…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 01:10 PM
3

Don't see how this is a cucked mentality. I mean, men have personal agency, too. That means they have responsibilities. Honestly, if you're a man and you don't want kids, then you can always wait until marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 05:37 PM
4

I'll admit I like Destiny, so I might be biased, but I always find it weird the narratives that a lot of people spin on this guy. Destiny being blue pilled?? The same guy that defended that streamer who hit his wife because she threw a cardboard box at him? The same guy that went after Walter's (the guy from fresh and fit), baby mama, and accused her of baby trapping when everyone was on her side? It doesn't seem like Destiny fits into your caricature of a blue pilled man who thinks women can "d…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 02:35 AM
0

Tran Dihn and Steven W. Gangestad, the creators of the original study of this hypothesis, already released a new paper in 2022 where they talk about the new and old replication studies and even admit that there's not enough evidence to conclude that women sexual desire differs all that much and that a woman's sexualiry is not well understood enough to display a difference between certain males. So this idea that discussion is getting stifled and no one wants to expose women or whatever is huge c…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 07:29 PM
-1

I think the most important thing to take from the red pill is the dual mating hypothesis. It's so hard to dispute on a logical basis that most people just pull the "those wolves in captivity studies were bullshit" card and don't elaborate. I have no idea what study you are referring to, but it is ironic. You treat this dual mating as a fact and yet label it as a hypothesis. That's not very logical. In truth, there's very little evidence for this hypothesis, and it hasn't been replicated in any s…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 08:37 AM
0

From the wikipedia page about this law: "Briffault clarifies that this rule applies only to nonhuman animals, and not to humans: “There is, in fact, no analogy between the animal family and the patriarchal human family. The former is entirely the product of the female’s instincts, and she, not the male, is the head.” In the chapter where Briffualt outlines his law, he applies it to tigers, elks, lions, zebras, gazelles, buffaloes, deer, monkeys, beavers, lions, birds and other animals, and only …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 12:43 AM
2

How many women do you think offer to work while their husband stays home with kids? Why would I have knowledge of how many women do this?? It's not like I have front row seats to every relationship. The point is that women have the unique experience of having the ability to demand that their partner foot their bills in a way that men do not. That's not what a "unique experience" is. Women have a unique experience of getting pregnant because men can't get pregnant. There are plenty of relationshi…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 10:44 PM
3

I mean, given that she was pregnant for 9-10 months while most likely having to work and taking care of chores; I think she has earned the right to sit on her ass for a month and post baby pics for a year. Also, this is very weird framing. "Financially support you", "pay my bills while I watch TV". You do realize that is his family that he's supporting. Right? Those are their bills and their family.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 10:05 PM
1

I was just correcting you because you implied that mentally ill people didn't have longer sentences. Also, I provided a scenario where both a man and woman can commit the same crime, and details of the case can affect sentencing despite being the same crime. Which you agree that it would. Making both of your earlier points wrong. Furthermore, I don't know why you call my scenario fake. You do realize that statutory rape laws were made because adult men were getting little girls and teenage girls…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 01:01 AM
2

So this is from the wiki page of "sentencing disparity" "The feminists groups argue that giving women lighter sentences is infantilizing, based on stereotyping, and incompatible with gender equality. Natalie Goulette and her colleagues found support for the “evil woman” theory, which suggests that is reserved for certain groups of women who appear to be docile and in need of protection." The answer is zero, because women do not hold other women accountable. Also from the same wiki page: In 2005 …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 11:06 PM
0

Well, no, people with disabilities are more likely to experience victimization, be arrested, be charged with a crime, and serve longer prison sentences once convicted than those without disabilities. For a lot of mentally ill people, incarceration is the default. https://thearc.org/our-initiatives/criminal-justice/ Also, there are circumstances that would require a difference in sentencing. No? Like if we imagine a 25 year old woman raping a 10 year old boy and a 25 year old man raping a 10 year…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 10:59 PM
3

I mean, it doesn't seem like you know anything about the draft. Women were close to signing up in like three different times now since 2016, but social conservatives in the Republican party have blocked it. And yet you seem more upset at feminists then at Republicans who don't care about equality.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 06:36 AM
–

Again, there are not that many female seriel killers or killers in general for men to have that opportunity but it does seem like men lust after female criminals all the same. And a lot of the time, it's not publicized like with male killers. because most men acknowledge how reckless/dangerous it would be to get close to a woman like that. Bruh, Casey Anthony received marriage proposals. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/casey-anthony-letters-include-marriage-proposals-support-condemnation/ But also,…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 10:38 PM
–

Are you serious? Do you actually think all criminals are in jail? Do you think you get in jail for infidelity or lying to your spouse. Just bcz you aren't in jail doesn't mean you are a good person. Also even if people were overwhelming good, there wouldn't be people broken due to failed relationships bcz they were treated bad. Hold on, now. You brought up the crime rate as a counterargument in your last response. So I presented to you the prison population. If you want to change your argument, …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 10:21 PM
–

Men thirst after criminals, but it usually stops at just that: initial sexual attraction. I'm pretty sure if you're thristing after a criminal and doing so publicly, then you want to do much more than just show "initial" attraction. Again. Jodi Arias got letters, too. Casey Anthony dating life doesn't seem to slow down. In fact, it seems to have gotten much better. Again, so many men defend female teachers who graped their students. That's not just "initial attraction." That's having a sex fanta…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 09:29 PM
–

If the overwhelming majority of people were good, crimes wouldn't be record high Lol, bro, what? You do realize that the prison population is 1 million, and some of those are nonviolent offenders. There are 334 million people in the US. Even then, the majority of criminals are typically male. So yeah; the overwhelming majority of people are good, honest people. Jesus, where do you live where this isn't the case? "lack of choice" not a valid argument Again, no one is forcing men to settle for a b…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 09:11 PM
–

Lol, I love this argument of "he had no choice but to settle with a bad woman who destroyed his life." I don't know why so many men on this sub are so content with treating men like childish victims.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 08:39 PM
–

It’s not only women who do it, they’re just more likely to do it. Yeah, because there are a lot more male seriel killers, and most televised and publicized criminal cases have to do with male criminals. But even then; you can easily go social media and see men thirsting after female criminals. There's even accounts on Twitter where people post mugshots of attractive female criminals, and yet there are men in the comments thirsting after them. Or do I need to bring up how so many men defend attra…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 08:36 PM
–

Men aren't helpless victims. They're adults just like women. Even if i were to grant that men lack choice, the lack of a choice isn't an excuse to deny someone's personal agency. And given the fact that the overwhelming majority of women (just like men) are good. honest people, then this "lack of choice" argument is just an excuse to try to paint men as helpless victims. He didn't have to settle for a terrible woman. He chose to. You guys can't go on and on about how women lack accountability an…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 08:26 PM
–

Casey Anthony had hundreds of men simping for her, and apparently, her dating life has never been better. Same with Jodi Arias, minus the dating part. So let's not act like this only goes one way.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 08:09 PM
–

I mean, by your logic; he should have chosen better.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 08:06 PM
–

Except for the fact that in the dating world, men don't get much of a choice aka matches aka dates This just comes off as an excuse and a weak one at that. No one is forcing men to choose the partners they are going to spend their lives with. Either men have personal agency or they don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 08:03 PM
0

this sort of thing is not going to work on women who want to have a relationship. Which is most women. Incels, as cringe as they are, just want to have a relationship. Not just sex. Anyone can get laid; it's not that hard. But he isn't going to have any success being in a committed relationship, which the women you are citing are probably talking about. If the red pill is all about just getting sex then okay, you may have a point but at the same time, they shouldn't complain that the only women …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 08:22 PM
2

Lol, dog everyone is transparent online. That's the main reason for anonymity. If the red pillers were transparent, then the women irl would be disgusted by them. Which is why they are manipulative, as said by you; it would be counterproductive. And manipulating people into sleeping with you is immoral. So what's the cognitive dissonance then? If the Red Pill actually worked, then why do you have to play pretend and manipulate people? That would seem like the cognitive dissonance is with red pil…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 07:45 PM
2

Again, you're not really saying anything. And the red pill exists in other places besides reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 06:13 PM
2

There is no disconnect; this is what the red pill talks about daily. Especially on social media sites like Youtube and Twitter and even in this subreddit. The point is you need to know how society is broken if you want to leverage it to better your standing. Except the Red Pill doesn't know how society functions to give objective advice like that. But also, this doesn't mean anything. You're just saying words. Your standing in society isn't divorced from society. It relies on it. Dating is just …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 05:13 PM
4

this feels like some no true scotsmen fallacy. What would be the point of attacking feminism and calling the West "gynocentric" if it didn't have anything to do with "fixing" society?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 04:10 PM
2

How can you be transparent and manipulative at the same time? If you're being manipulative, then you aren't being honest about your motives because you have some other goals in mind. This means you're aren't being transparent.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 03:57 PM
1

This is such a weird way to view relationships. It's like you guys take the 50/50 thing to literal. Contributions are not just about money or splitting every bill. Unpaid labor, like childcare, chores, making appointments, and so on, are also contributions. Especially for men who work long hours. The whole point of a housewife, for example, was the fact that she was empowering her husband to pursue a career and raise up in the ranks by sacrificing her career to focus on domestic tasks. That in i…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 01:53 PM
6

Okay, this is again. I'm just going by Google: "In 1993, Scott and Bezos married. The following year, they left D. E. Shaw moved to Seattle, and Bezos founded Amazon with Scott's support. Scott was one of Amazon's early key contributors, and was heavily involved in Amazon's early days, working on the company's name, business plan, accounts, and shipping early orders. She also negotiated the company's first freight contract. After 1996, Scott took a less involved role in the business, focusing on…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 01:33 PM
10

she wants to leave you and take half your shit. Why do you guys say this like women don't contribute anything to the relationship? Also, it's martial assets; so it wasn't his to begin with. richest woman in the world became rich with a divorce I just google this but the richest woman in the world is a woman named Françoise Bettencourt Meyers. Who got her some of fortune after, ironically enough, her mother died. "Her mother died in September 2017, after which her fortune tripled with her investm…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 12:41 PM
3

The median household income for a husband is 65k, the wife 35k. The majority of households don't even crack 120k. The hypocrisy is that he wants to accuse American women of thinking in extremes while providing a hypothetical that's extreme.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 10:01 PM
4

It's really weird how american females think in these extremes, it seems to be a cultural issue with you guys Lol, bro, is this not you 2 hours ago on another thread? "What I'm referring to is women who earn say 30k a year and feel entitled to men who earn 120k." Wow, hypocrisy must be a cultural issue where you're from.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 08:55 PM
12

Not really. A gun or a guard dog would be much better.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/24 08:28 AM
1

What this tells me is that age gap relationships are less accepted in say secular and English speaking societies or Jewish communities than, for example, in an Islamic community in Bosnia, or in the Middle East. I think it's more of the case that acceptance of polygamous relationships tends to lead to higher age gap relationships vs monogamous relationships and that countries with a robust education system seem to result in people being married later in life. Which also affects the age gap in re…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 05:03 PM
2

It could be more common than in Western countries like the USA, but it doesn't seem to be a common occurring thing. I'm just going off this graph from pew research: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2020/01/03/globally-women-are-younger-than-their-male-partners-more-likely-to-age-alone/ The average age gap seems to be within one's age group except for places like Africa and Bangladesh.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 04:04 PM
1

Granted, I haven't read the study, but this just seems rather illogical. Wouldn't it be more likely that they controlled for the variables in the groups, meaning that a "single man" is just a man who has never been married? If the study is about marriage, then I don't see why they would add divorced men in and mix with single men who have never been married. It would be like expecting a study about the benefits of driving a car to add penalties of a car crash to those who have never been in a ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 03:12 PM
5

Not just in Western countries. Most countries around the world have small age gaps for heterosexual relationships. The only places that are different is some African countries and Bangladesh. And I'm sure we can find news stories of all types of crazy stuff. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2020/01/03/globally-women-are-younger-than-their-male-partners-more-likely-to-age-alone/
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 02:21 PM
1

Most people use the internet, but that's different from actively engaging in social media communities. The internet is a huge place. In the real world; no one cares about an age gap between a 20 and 25 year old or a 30 and 40 or a 25 and 32.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 02:17 PM
4

I mean, if we are just talking globally, then the average age gap is 2 to 3 years in most countries around the world. The only places that seem to be different is sub saharan Africa and Bangladesh.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 02:08 PM
4

Given the history and reputation of France; that's not surprising
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 05:10 PM
4

Just because you have a basic human right to something doesn't mean you are entitled to that something. Is food a human, right? Is shelter a human, right? Is water? Should we force people to open their homes to homeless people? Should we force people to give their food to starving people? If the father wants to know if the kid is his or not, then he can just get a paternity test. That choice is open to him. He doesn't have to tell his wife about it or anything. I don't think it's a good idea to …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 04:32 PM
-2

This is false. Paternity tests for legal reasons are legal in France. It just as to be court ordered. Private paternity tests are the only thing that's illegal. If you live in the USA, we have similar laws. Private paternity tests can't be used to determine legal matters or child custody. Only a court ordered paternity test can do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 04:22 PM
2

Not really, it would say the opposite. Again, if the evidence was bad, then he would have been released a long time ago. The statute of limitations is about the commencing of the case. It has nothing to do with how long a case may take. For example, Harvey Weinstein was arrested in 2018, and his trial didn't start until 2022. He was found guilty, and his sentencing wasn't until early 2023. That's five years right there, and his case was about a rape charge from 2013. So, the statute of limitatio…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 01:30 PM
3

Then I'll be free to go Edit: Didn't see that last part. That would depend on if they have probable cause or not. If not, then I'll be free to go. If yes, then it probably means I committed a crime, so I would just call my lawyer.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 12:23 PM
10

If I committed a crime, then sure
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 12:12 PM
11

Well, that's a new one. I've never heard of a torture method where the captives are given more and more freedom. Also, it's pretty normal to give suspects more freedom if they don't present a flight risk while awaiting trial. We have a similar system in the US. If the evidence was shoddy and weak; he would have been released months ago. The fact that his travel is still restricted means the prosecutors think they have a strong enough case for a trial.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 12:01 PM
15

He's not allowed to leave the EU. It seems they don't think he's a flight risk. It's not a testament of the quality of the evidence, or else he would have been released months ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 11:46 AM
0

All you have stated thus far is just loaded rhetoric, emotional appeals, and a victim complex that would make a spoiled rich kid envious. You haven't stated any information that would require me to fact check. Honestly, it's really sick that the only reason that you "care" about Ukrainian men is to push your victim narrative about the Western world. You clearly have no understanding of Ukraine's culture, politics, or its people. That's a clear case of virtue signaling from you; again, I don't kn…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 08:19 PM
-2

In your first response, you said that Ukrainian were facing a genocide and in both responses, you said, "women who complain about patriarchy are brought to safety." You're deliberately trying to provoke an image of "oppression" onto men by mischaracterizing the conflict. That's a real appeal to emotion. Again, you are using the appeal to emotion fallacy in this response. I know you guys have zero self-awareness, but at least have the intelligence to not throw around these "fallacies" that you yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 05:29 PM
17

I don't think war is a good counter given how many mass rapes, mass executions, and war crimes have been inflicted on the civilian population in past conflicts. It's really messed up and distasteful to use the suffering of a country that was invaded for no reason as an argument to use against women. Also, the last time there was a real genocide; women, men, and children were not spared. Again, it is rather distasteful.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 02:47 PM
3

I think you may be on to something because despite my liberal leanings or my "blue pilled" leaning (although I don't really like these pills), I've always felt weird, even shameful at times, about making a woman pay for her meal. Even if she would offer; I would still deny her and pay for the meal fully. And I never understood why I felt that way. For me, a lot of my mannerisms and behaviors come from my father, who always paid for everyone when we would go out to eat despite my mom making more …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 09:55 PM
2

I'm 25. Also, I addressed your points. Which points am I avoiding? Nothing you have said has made any sense about therapy. My aunt is a therapist and mostly works with girls and young women, and my dad is a therapist on a military base and mostly works with Air Force officers. And they both say the same thing. I don't understand what's the "feminine process" here is regarding therapy.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 08:42 PM
3

But therapy does both. The therapist can't read your mind; you have to talk about your issues, and then from there, you have to take action to fix those issues. I have never heard of anyone benefitting from a therapist by just talking. I have never heard of this. "Do you want me to listen or give suggestions." How are you supposed to give suggestions if you don't listen? That doesn't make any sense, Also, isn't the whole point of something like the male loneliness epidemic about men not having a…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 08:03 PM
2

Success and failure are not relevant to someone's confidence. The world works of chance; you are going to fail even if you have strong confidence and you are going to have some success even if you're a loser. It's how you deal with those things that define you; not the other way around. How did those winners become winners in the first place?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 07:02 PM
-2

Listen, I'm sorry, but this is rich is coming from this sub. You guys make these kinds of "generalizing" statements about women all the time on this sub. It's just rather amusing and ironic because I thought women were supposed to be the ones doing the gaslighting.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 06:51 PM
0

Okay. So, which one is the feminine process? Talking about the problem or solving it? Because therapy does both. You are supposed to be taking steps to improve your mental state, and you can't do that without talking about it first. All therapists are supposed to do is just give you the tools and methods to take those steps for you to solve your own problems. People can't read minds. You have to talk about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 06:38 PM
-11

How is it generalizing men if it's specially aimed towards this subreddit and further qualifying by saying "most"? That's not a generalization of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 06:30 PM
3

Confidence comes from self-assurance. If confidence comes from success, then everyone would be miserable because you are going to fail at a lot more than you will succeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 06:26 PM
2

The first line of the post is literally "most men on here"...
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 06:20 PM
1

But this doesn't really tell me anything, nor does it address to the original question. First, I was talking about dating; not marriages. Women are more likely to sacrifice their careers to raise a family in marriages, so that stat isn't relevant here. If two lawyers decided to get married and the woman stays home to raise the family; is she nowhere near his field? In general, people tend to date within their own environment, meaning their own workspace, education, and surroundings. It isn't lik…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 10:50 PM
0

I mean, that seems a bit silly, no? How many male doctors and lawyers are dating female janitors or cashier's? They would most likely date other people in their respective field or who's on the same level.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 06:35 PM
6

Well, I can only speak for my personal experience, but I grew up going to private Catholic schools and am currently enrolled in a private university. But man, the number of men that complain so much about "degenerate" women while also saying they want a woman who is a modest and traditional. And yet, surprise surprise, the women they chase after are these "degenerate" women who they see as getting sex more easily from. Also, I would add that a few times when men get rejected or when the dating s…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 01:28 AM
9

Why do you guys keep bringing this point up like feminists control all three branches of government?? Also, I'm pretty sure if the government cared about women's opinions, then abortion would have been safe right about now. Proceeds to do nothing about said problem?? What do you want them to do? Why can't men just organize and demand change? Why do you guys expect women to do everything for you? If these issues are such an injustice, then do something about it instead of blaming other people who…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 01:49 PM
2

https://www.thetransmitter.org/spectrum/link-parental-age-autism-explained/ "That study also suggested that women under age 25 are more likely to have a child with autism than older women. The finding echoed that of several other studies that reported that teenage mothers also have increased odds of having a child with autism." "Even so, the absolute chance of having a child with autism is low even for the oldest parents. The researchers in the 2017 study calculated that about 1.5 percent of chi…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 08:36 PM
7

Divorce rates are way lower today than since the early 1900s. https://www.lovetoknow.com/life/relationships/historical-divorce-rate-statistics "The US has generally seen a decline in divorce since the start of the 21st century." The divorce rate was highest in 1970s when no fault divorce was introduced. So I don't know where you concluded that divorce is "skyrocketing." Marriage rates have actually increased since covid lockdowns were lifted. https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/2024/03/18/americ…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 08:21 PM
3

I somewhat agree, I think the laxity on gender roles has more to do with war than businesses and government benefits. The Great War, for example, did help women secure rights like voting and employment because men weren't there to fill jobs. WW2 also probably helped women secure more rights as well. In comparison, the industrial revolution saw, in my opinion, more distinct and stricter gender roles. I believe that's even where "Housewife" became a more used term. Although, stay at home moms were…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 07:06 PM
4

I think that's the ultimate irony here. They may not have foundation for it, but honestly, I think these Arab dictators are more fearful of their population than in Western countries. Arab dictators have to listen to their people (at least every once in a while) or else face a violent revolt. But also, I think Feminism is more reactionary than ideological. Meaning I believe Feminism wouldnt exist if women were truly happy or satisfied with the situation they were forced in. Unlike Islam. Like I …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 06:39 PM
1

Divorce is forbidden in Amish culture, so that goes without saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 05:31 PM
11

What does it say that every country that gives women more freedoms also tends to do much better in almost every regard, including economy, wealth gap, standard of living, and education? And therefore, tend to be more affluent. I'm just saying the West is the world hegemon for a good reason. I wouldn't call it a "cultural infection" if the people from those countries want change. What I found rather amusing is that the article even says that one of the reasons for some of these legal reforms for …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 05:29 PM
10

"Losing their children" I don't know where this is true, but it's not the US. Is there bias? Sure, but it's not as dramatic as "husbands are under the whip from their wives." To start: https://legaljobs.io/blog/child-custody-statistics "Parents settle 90% of child custody disputes without a judge’s ruling." So this has nothing to do with the courts. "In 51% of custody cases, both parents agree that the mother should have custody." So fathers more often than not give women more custody. I feel li…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 05:14 PM
1

Not all theories have the same validity. But you initially said these were facts. So now you agree these aren't facts? So, the autism link to older materiality is not proven. Also, gravity is both a law and a theory. Lol, so earlier when you thought these were "fact," why didn't you use the "women are wonderful effect" to caveat your sources' findings??? You only thought up this excuse after there were other studies proving that the relationship isn't as clear-cut, has you thought. Even though I…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 01:48 PM
1

I don't have to believe or cope; all the women I know in my life had kids in their 40s and I don't believe there is anything special about them that would make them exceptions except chance. Also, I already said that fertility decreases with age, but I don't think this woman should be pressured to have kids as soon as possible. Obviously. It's harder to get pregnant at a higher age. Everyone knows this. That wasn't in dispute. On the autism point; the studies are mixed on this: https://www.thetr…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 11:54 AM
4

Every middle aged women that I know personally have had kids in their 40s without any issues. My aunt had her youngest at 43. My mom had her two youngest at 45 and 47. One of my professors is having her kid, and she's 41. One of the girls I used to date in high school; her mom had her at 43. And they did it the old-fashioned way. Really small sample size, I know, but I don't think this is an issue for most women. Obviously, I think everyone knows fertility decreases with age; that's also true fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 08:55 AM
4

Couldn't it be argued that women don't date down in income, education, or social status because of the societal expectations to make sacrifices to her career? I mean, it wouldn't make sense for her to date down if society expects her to focus more on family life. it would be incredibly weird if Jeff Bezos was with a woman who was a nobody from McDonald's. That is incredibly rare. People tend to date in their own environment, meaning similar places, income, and social status. I don't know about h…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 09:25 PM
3

The only way to annul a marriage due to cheating is if the spouse never tended to be faithful in the first place. Annulment is null and void and is mostly used when the marriage is under false pretenses or failure to function. That's a good pro tip, but my argument is why does the cheating husband keep 50% while the cheating wife loses everything? So why shouldn't that pro tip also apply to cheating men, and they should also lose everything. So if it's a housewife and everything is in her husban…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 03:04 PM
6

Marriage is not like any other relationship. Do you know of any normal breakup that involves community assets, assets, investment accounts, mortgage rates, loans, unpaid labor, medical insurance, and so on? This isn't like two high-school lovebirds. Your scenario isn't representative of reality. What if the husband cheats on his housewife? Nothing is in her name; it's all owned by her husband. She doesn't have anything. So you would say that she is owned 50% of his assets? Why? Because the flip …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 11:47 AM
7

"You figure it out like a boyfriend and girlfriend breaking up" -So you mean negotiate? Like 100% of all divorce proceedings. Divorce is not "breaking up", it's a legal proceeding. You can't change that. And you can't retroactively declare martial assets to be regular assets. "The problem is you don't get half of my stuff because you cheated" -Oh, so you get to keep everything if she cheats? But she only gets half if you cheat? Lol, why can't she keep everything if you cheat? Why is it 50/50 in …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 09:27 AM
5

Except, the 50/50 is talking about martial assets, so your example doesn't make sense. Just think about this; if a poor person gets married to a rich person; do you think that poor person is automatically entitled to half that rich person's stuff? That's not how that works. The 50/50 thing is done to save the institution of marriage. Because without it; a man can cheat and leave his housewife of 10 or more years, and she would have nothing to her name. Just 10 wasted years.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 08:51 AM
8

I'm confused. What does martial assets have to do with cheating? Also, you can already do this by just getting a prenuptial agreement. Although, I always find out hilarious how so many men will go on and on about sacredness of motherhood and yet also claim that women deserve nothing for all the unpaid labor she had to do or the sacrifices to her career she made for the relationship to empower her husband. Like, let's think about it. If this is so simple, then why haven't the courts gone in your …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 08:44 AM
-4

"Especially if they can't put themselves in the guys' shoes" It doesn't sound like you have put yourself in women's shoes. If you think dating is easier for women just because she can get matches online, then you're in a bubble. You can't demand empathy while showing none yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 05:37 PM
16

Feminists aren't the ones who drafted the bill because there's no party called "feminists." Surprise, surprise; feminists don't run the country and can't write bills into existence. The country is ruled by two parties, Republicans and Democrats. Feminists are a part of the voter base in the Democratic party, so the Democrats have been pushing women to be on selective service. Republicans voter base consists of rural and religious people who think that the role of women is in the house and not in…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 03:45 PM
2

The answer to this question is because the world nor the country is ruled by feminists. Your life is not ruled by feminists either. First, selective service is a political question. Not one about gender equality. The reason women aren't required to sign up is because they were forbidden from a few select military jobs. That all changed when Obama lifted the restrictions. Ever since then Democrats have been pushing to add women to selective service, and the Republicans have been against the measu…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 03:22 PM
-1

To start; divorce is a legal proceeding. And to add to that; just because women initiate the majority of divorces does not mean she's the cause. If the husband cheated on his wife and she filed for divorce, then is that her fault? Not to mention that the overwhelming majority of divorces are amicably agreed to by both parties without the need for a lawyer. With that being said; women are required to file for divorce given that the husband is almost always the breadwinner. The reason for this is …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 12:54 PM
1

First, your math is completely wrong here. I just google where you got the percentage from; and I'm assuming you got it from the CDC. It would be 32.9/100000, which would be 0.0003. But you then have to times 0.0003 with 100 to get the percentage which would be 0.0329%. Secondly, the statistics don't matter here. Statistically speaking, everything is extremely improbable until it happens. Dying from diseases, from a car crash, from murder, from random mishaps are all extremely rare, but we still…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 06:09 PM
3

Because men don't take any risks that come with childbirth and pregnancy. You have to make the argument on why something or someone who is experiencing zero risks alt to having the same or similar rights to someone who is experiencing all of the risks. Our society functions based on the fact that those who experience more risks are given more options. Rather, that be a boss vs. employees or the military vs. civilians or an adult vs. a child. It's just in this case; men face no risk from pregnanc…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 03:57 PM
11

Wouldn't the answer be because men can't get pregnant and, therefore, don't have to deal with the risks that pregnancy brings?? I mean, women have died from childbirth before, and there are other health risks that come with getting pregnant. When it comes to child support; there is no risk involved on the parents' part. And ideally; the money is for the children. Parents do have a financial responsibility to their kids. That's not a plight nor an issue but a responsibility. Especially given that…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 02:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter