TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Excellent_You5494 Archive

View 4 posts and 1,033 comments by Excellent_You5494 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,033 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Waste of marketing.
/r/MensRights01/03/25 10:33 AM
3

Like how it shows predatory, violent, and aggressive women. Something only spoken about in places like this, and by the occasional conservative online personality. Quite frankly it could be called pro male, all the male characters but one are relatively sympathetic.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 10:44 PM
3

Well it's not anti male, and it features things about women that show gynocentricity.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 09:21 PM
29

Yes, grass is green. Too bad multiple influential organizations, including the CDC, utilize said biased research. Christina Hoff Sommers and conservatives have said that for over 30 years.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 07:03 PM
4

Arcane is pretty pro male. Lots of aggressive female villains.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 05:00 PM
9

Report them, they can't present if you do all the work. That's practically plagiarism, or something similar. Report the sexism as well.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 04:51 PM
11

I believe naturism is the cure to lust.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/25 10:24 AM
27

No. In the US it's only been 188 years for white guys, 155 for all men 21+ 105 for women 21+ And only 54 years for 18-21 along with women of that age group. So only 1 century. This is common knowledge, one only need to joogle the dates.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 08:41 AM
70

Toxic femininity, all emotion, no logic. You can only be united by hatred for so long.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 03:30 AM
1

Did she say how?
/r/MensRights28/02/25 02:18 AM
14

Thank you for finding the words.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 12:36 AM
1

Mostly this place has been used to fill petitions. Though, i see more on the regular men's rights sub.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/25 11:06 PM
1

Real change requires all of it. There is real advocacy. Petitions Grass root lobbying Etc. Women get so far with their issues because everyone already knows they have them, because they spent a hundred years mostly doing awareness advocacy, the protests, and general complaints. If you want to be more political than awareness advocacy, then makes a grassroot lobby groups. You can ask locally or here, or wherever for members. You'll certainly figure out why awareness advocacy has merit, and it's v…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/25 11:01 PM
12

They were trying to appropriate the word, "misandry," the moment we started using it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/25 09:52 PM
291

It pathologizes males, per the feminist playbook. There is always something wrong with men, they must always be thinking about women, they cannot have their own thoughts and feelings, and opinions.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 09:51 PM
8

We have no idea what you're referring to.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 06:54 PM
1

The reason is because the feminists lobby, who are in power and influential, have labeled men's rights as a hate group hell bent on stripping the rights of women, they say we complain while having all rights and privilege, which we don't.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 05:36 PM
6

He uses too many buzzwords to be serious.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 07:33 AM
1

I ain't got time to sort through all those EO's.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 03:57 AM
1

Well you shouldn't denounce them over one failure. I've only had 1/6 issues left unresolved.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 02:11 AM
1

You just told me it was resolved. No group is going to be able to guarantee a resolution you'd like.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 02:05 AM
-1

As a consumer you can also file a complaint with a business through them, and they will work to resolve it.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 02:04 AM
1

The review isn't the sole goal. The resolution is.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 01:47 AM
2

Sounds like you really can't put it all on the Google review then, you used multiple things as I advise OP.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 01:41 AM
1

A complaint through the BBB is not the same as a review.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 01:34 AM
-1

Did you file a complaint through the BBB, that is what they're good at.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 01:28 AM
-5

You have 100% never tried it.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 01:19 AM
0

Meh, they've resolved several complaints for me, including one against reddit, on a premium account I used.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 12:18 AM
15

They have this thing called, "Citizens Advice." For consumer complaints. Idk if they'd take it, I'd try.
/r/MensRights26/02/25 11:17 PM
8

The BBB has influence with businesses in Canada and the UK. They usually take your complaints right to the company. They aren't just a review service.
/r/MensRights26/02/25 11:16 PM
107

I'd contact the Better Business Bureau and file an official complaint and review. On yelp as well. And contact the Business' management. Definitely report them to your health department.
/r/MensRights26/02/25 10:36 PM
1

No, they haven't. You seem to have. Also, have you ever actually heard or read Peterson outside youtube shorts and leftist hate?
/r/MensRights26/02/25 06:45 PM
2

I call fake news. But there is a reason why kids were not always allowed to testify in court.
/r/MensRights25/02/25 10:49 PM
1

If you're falsely accused the record should be on your side, a prosecutor, a good one anyway, isn't going to waste their time with something that doesn't help them win.
/r/MensRights25/02/25 09:25 PM
4

If we must say we need it, then we must take the title from the men's liberation movement, and deny feminist control of the liberation narrative.
/r/MensRights25/02/25 06:53 PM
11

Medication isn't therapy.
/r/MensRights25/02/25 06:46 PM
2

Subbed
/r/MensRights25/02/25 06:44 PM
-1

Andrew Tate was a pick up artist, he didn't even believe in men's rights. Everyone knows that. Thetinman is a poor example imo. He came here and went on a tirade against roma army because she wouldn't work with him after finding out some questionable information. Like, these people serve a political purpose, but they are no Christina Hoff Sommers, or Warren Farrell, or Janice Fiamengo, or Karen Straughen. Even J Peterson has done more than most of whom you mention.
/r/MensRights25/02/25 06:11 PM
0

No, it's not, it's just not appropriate for this question.
/r/MensRights25/02/25 12:17 PM
-9

It is though, definitely not good for dating advice, especially not this particular question. The users here will be incapable of unbiased answers due the politics involved here.
/r/MensRights25/02/25 11:52 AM
-13

r/askmenover30 You are currently in a political sub.
/r/MensRights25/02/25 11:30 AM
58

It never cared. Even in medieval times it wasn't that your wife was obedient to you, not that that would be good anyway, It was that you were responsible for her. You would be punished if she did anything against the rules, the only real exception that I could find was infidelity, and even then the husband would still be expected to make pennence, she'd just also do it in that case. If she got drunk and belligerent at a tavern, you'd be punished because it was your job to prevent that. It was al…
/r/MensRights25/02/25 07:41 AM
10

Incels can be MRAs, but one is not an MRA simply because they're an incel. You're are not an incel because you don't join the military, you are an incel because you can't get laid, that is the term's definition. Yes, there are probably people in the military like that.
/r/MensRights25/02/25 03:13 AM
6

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/gS2t2uii7b
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/02/25 12:31 AM
3

I like that most of it didn't subscribe to feminist patriarchy theory, at least early on. Though I reject the concept of healthy or toxic masculinity. Masculinity is just masculinity, and every person on earth has it. And what might be considered toxic certainly isn't what feminists say, i cannot read every article to determine the site's full stance.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/02/25 12:22 AM
23

But there were MANY women who both pushed for and voted for Roe Vs Wade to be overturned.. it is mostly women
/r/MensRights25/02/25 12:13 AM
29

You hate men so much that you, a trans person, just threw even the trans men under the bus. Your statement has nothing whatsoever to do with us, or this comment thread. Completely non sequitur.
/r/MensRights25/02/25 12:12 AM
10

Only a single one of your comments stated that; every one before and after was blantant misandry, or other anti male sexism, your very first comment denies a systemic discrimination against males. Even the one comment that was seemingly about yourself alone, had a misandric remark.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 11:55 PM
13

You have made numerous fallacious statements that solely exist to promote hatred of the male gender.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 11:34 PM
12

We do, you are being treated here as an equal, despite your hostility and sexism.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 11:25 PM
12

All non sport or defensive violence is feminine by its nature. This is a perfect example of funding for women, against men. There is no unbiased research whatsoever on androcide. Additionally, you moved the goalpost, your earlier statement was on abuse.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 11:00 PM
28

That's debatable. In fact numerous government and private research has shown that women are the primary abusers.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 10:36 PM
45

dude there is nothing wrong with guys having to support the children they had a part in making are you dense. There is when women can make unilateral decisions that affect men. Good feminists like Karen DeCrow even believed that. women are not lobbying against nutsack/prostate cancer research you fucking tweaker but there are men trying to pass laws that take away women's rights to bodily autonomy They are, they fight for more funding for women's health, and that will likely be taken from men's …
/r/MensRights24/02/25 10:34 PM
54

Child support Alimony That doesn't even begin to mention the anti male language, and male exclusionary language in nearly every other policy. Or the government funding for male research and programs that women's lobbies always fight against.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 10:19 PM
75

They don't need to draft anti male law when they already exist in the law, and there are active suppression efforts to change them from feminists, etc.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 10:11 PM
26

I got banned from guycry for saying we should reclaim the term.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 09:12 PM
18

Lawyer up, and for the love of God, wear condoms.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 06:41 PM
3

Menslib Feminist Askfeminists Twoxchromosome
/r/MensRights24/02/25 06:38 PM
-4

Fake news. The population of online dating sites is like 80% male. And of the other 20, od argue like 2% is female.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 10:28 PM
0

Most of the planet outside the west has male exclusive spaces. Yes, it is still a fight. But feminism certainly doesn't have the power it used to. That is my entire argument in this regard.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 10:14 PM
0

Yes, but after the last few gender crises, I don't think the feminists will have the power they did in the 60s and 80s. Especially not in the US, there it would be a perfect time to make male exclusive clubs again.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 10:00 PM
5

Reddit? No This particular sub? Maybe
/r/MensRights23/02/25 09:53 PM
1

Feminism is, but women are not Feminism. And feminism is not as entrenched as you think, certainly not enough for all your doomsaying and panic.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 09:44 PM
1

You're link about management positions does not prove your point. If anything it proves mine. It is solely a policy issue DEI, not some conspiracy about how women corrupt and take over male spaces, which is your argument.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 09:41 PM
1

My address over the first link still holds against all the others.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 09:39 PM
1

Do tell me why you insist that I haven't addressed your arguments?
/r/MensRights23/02/25 09:37 PM
1

Case in point.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 09:35 PM
1

That just proves you're using nothing but emotion to hold to your arguments.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 09:33 PM
1

I have argued against you in every proper way. You are the one solely utilizing non sequitur and ad hominem, strawman, and circular argument.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 09:31 PM
1

See my other comment addressing this.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 09:28 PM
1

Again sir, you are being obtuse. More non gamer op-eds and arguments don't change my argument, you just refuse to acknowledge my argument. Anita Sarkeesian and Gamergate are more proof that you are incorrect. Both male and female gamers despised and fought against Sarkeesian's activities. I highly doubt you've even looked at game or the culture since tetris.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 09:27 PM
4

Because men are the bourgeoisie, that the proletariat is destined to destroy. They will never see you as human. They refuse to see male issues, systemic discrimination, and feminist hostility because the male is the bourgeois class. They just use the term, "privilege," to hide the Marxist roots. There is no patriarchy in the west. Women have equal power and opportunity to men.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 09:18 PM
1

I've been addressing everything you say. You're just too obtuse to acknowledge my argument and actually debate.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 09:15 PM
1

What you're telling me is that you hate people so much that you believe the first non gamer articles you see. Do you even play games?
/r/MensRights23/02/25 09:13 PM
1

Your point is fundamentally false, and gaming culture alone proves that, from it's earliest existence. You are being obtuse, you have yet to argue why you think your argument is sequitur, you only use the radical feminist denial of male exclusive spaces as an argument, and that is also a non sequitur argument for the idea that co-ed spaces always become women's spaces. You're being feminine, only using hatred as an argument.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 09:08 PM
1

You still haven't addressed Sally and how male groups and male franchises are destroyed on the altar of feminism. Because it has nothing to do with the discussion, it was completely non sequitur. You are trying to use fallacious logic to increase aggression between men and women.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 09:00 PM
32

Report the issue to her boss via email.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 08:58 PM
1

That is completely illogical reasoning. Like saying Jerusalem only has significance to the jews because it's in a Jewish state. Society is not zero sum.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 08:53 PM
1

That is non sequitur. I said gym exclusivity can be decided by policy. I said gaming has never been exclusionary, and shouldn't be.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 08:28 PM
1

Your original position makes non sequitur arguments against mine, everything you say beyond, This is in response to you saying that spaces where men were the majority can't be for men and must be neutral even though as I have shown, neutrality doesn't work. It just becomes for women. Is just further non sequitur nonsense.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 08:26 PM
1

This is in response to you saying that spaces where men were the majority can't be for men and must be neutral even though as I have shown, neutrality doesn't work. It just becomes for women. Stop dodging the question. At no point was that said, it's non sequitur. Gaming is neither masculine or feminine, and it's a recreational business, it makes no sense to be exclusionary, it never was in all of history. OP only spoke about gyms and games.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 06:09 PM
2

Your position basically let's just surrender everything to women. How is that my position? Where on earth did I say that? This is why i call you obtuse.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 04:50 PM
1

Was this one of the interviews of OF models?
/r/MensRights23/02/25 04:49 PM
21

-reads -looks at feminist playbook -hmmmm....
/r/MensRights23/02/25 04:47 PM
3

You're being an obtuse doomsayer is what you're doing.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 04:44 PM
-1

You don't need to make a small church group, every church has a men's Bible study. Women don't invade, they have their own.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 04:39 PM
2

June
/r/MensRights23/02/25 04:36 PM
-3

I don't believe you read my comment.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 04:33 PM
22

Grindr allowing it confounded me.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 08:11 AM
24

Gaming and gym are not explicitly male spaces. They are only majority male spaces. Gyms only become exclusive by policy. Gaming has never been, and should never be exclusive outside of particular online lobbies for friends. That just would not make sense. Join a men's church group, that is an example of the kind of space that men have trouble keeping, and still exists. There used to be all sorts of clubs, non-greek fraternities, etc. You could start your own exclusive club, i do think there's le…
/r/MensRights23/02/25 08:08 AM
9

Feminists have falsely defined the MRM as anti woman and anti Feminist. No researcher in their right mind would take the label. They'd lose funding because it would be gender studies and Feminism controls gender studies. Feminists only do research with the goal of making men the issue for their problems under their version of Satan, the patriarchy. It's highly biased and hate filled. Though there are a few pro-male researchers and groups, as others have mentioned. It's all very grassroot.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 02:11 AM
-1

I think whimsy could be deemed feminine, it's expressive and emotion forward, and it's important to note that everyone does it though. No man can say he's never done something mischievous just because he was amused by it. I define feminity as anything which is emotion forward, expressive, and highly communicative. Expressionist art is inherently femininine because it all those things first, before the masculine. I would not call it simplistic. Shakespearean content is mostly feminine. Shakespear…
/r/MensRights23/02/25 01:25 AM
2

Must of gotten a prickly one. Idk how it works, but it seems like the moderators take turns there, and some are like that, and other don't care about anything.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/25 01:02 AM
1

Keep sacrificing yourself if you want, but why do you want to force men to sacrifice for women. How is that good for society? Why not encourage women to provide their fair share? Stop dodging the questions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/25 12:03 AM
0

Enlighten me 🙄
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/25 11:54 PM
0

No, they broke into the building.
/r/MensRights22/02/25 11:45 PM
1

How so?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/25 09:26 PM
10

That makes sense.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/25 09:00 PM
0

Why does a complex society have to mean that systemic discrimination against men is good? That is exactly what you're promoting. Men should never be made to pay for women, that is conservative, it is discrimination, women are equal, and forced altruism is morally evil.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/25 08:50 PM
126

Men are civilized. There is no debate.
/r/MensRights22/02/25 08:36 PM
2

Nuclear family, no one even remembers what a traditional family was like. Traditional families were the very large groups that are seen in history, the "village." The nuclear family lead to the current state, it was unnatural. That's my uniquely un-feminist criticism.
/r/MensRights22/02/25 07:47 PM
4

Solely by its dictionary definition, not by the feminist idea. Certainly not in the west, and especially not the UK, where you're writing from.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/25 07:27 PM
3

What is your argument here?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/25 07:10 PM
4

A jihaddist government. A foreign invader. A theocracy. None of which require male only executives, legislative representatives, and judges. Feminism's patriarchy is not the dictionary definition. No western government or society is a patriarchy under the real definition.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/25 06:45 PM
6

You're not going to like it, but I'm pretty sure the daily wire has one, might be a movie, idk.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/25 06:31 PM
3

If you believe in the feminist idea of patriarchy, then you hate men, you might not think so, you might not say, "[#]killallmen" but to follow their idea of patriarchy and use the word as they do, is still misandry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/25 06:29 PM
4

Yes, but it's patriarchy solely by its rigid dictionary definition, not all the feminists believe patriarchy to be.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/25 06:27 PM
3

Who is saying misogynists don't exist? What is your argument here? You affirmed the use of feminist hate speech. Patriarchy does not exist, it is an ever-changing all encompassing evil to the feminist, and usually used to make males out to be a bourgeois class, and women the proletariat to destroy them. To affirm its existence is to accept hate speech.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/25 06:21 PM
4

The existence of sexism doesn't prove the existence of some all encompassing satan, mostly used to hate on men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/25 06:13 PM
6

It's your opening dude. On the surface, there is an easy yet incomplete explanation for many young men voting Trump over Harris: it is proof of the patriarchy in action. Some may argue it was young men afraid of losing their masculinity and male privilege and so they refused to vote for a woman in a show of raw misogyny. Some would argue that men of colour are just more sexist. There is no rejection of the concept to counter this statement. In fact, you affirm it. It would be disingenuous to pre…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/25 06:08 PM
5

I don't understand why there are still government benefits for marriage when half of them already don't make it. [#]end tax privileges for marriage [#]end shared finances [#]end alimony
/r/MensRights22/02/25 05:44 PM
5

Extremist claim that we should encourage society to support men. Get out of here my man An extremist hates other sides to a point that they cannot recognize why the other side reaches the exact population the extremist fails to reach. At least be honest who you are, name 5 left wing policies you support as centrist or stop lying who you are. Free healthcare Free education Price control Minimum wages Paternity leave
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/25 10:56 AM
1

Personal improvement is good and empathetic advice for men, especially when it comes to the lonliness epidemic. It is a false narrative, that you extremists claim, to think that it blames men. You will fail to bring men to the left without such advice. Additionally, the mudslinging against conservatives will keep males conservative, men remember who was there in the important times. Conservatives defended men in every gender crisis, ever, and the left attacked them at times. As a centrist, I can…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/25 10:44 AM
4

Patriarchy is a hate word, you should know that in the MRM space, that is not limited to the leftist MRAs.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/25 10:33 AM
-3

What makes you think the conservative advice doesn't come from a place of understanding?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/25 10:27 AM
-7

We cannot sit here and say that we have no power, if that is the take of the L-MRM, then that is why it will fail. The conservatives tell men how to live successfully as conservatives, and it is a viable option. Regardless of how you feel about conservatives. You might not see it as empathy, but i don't see the left telling men anything except, "fuck you," and encouraging nihilism at best, case in point. What exactly do you think empathy is? What would you require?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/25 10:01 AM
-11

No conservative has ever said, "take the red pill." Pill people are progressives, just not in the way liberals want. Conservatives tell men to pull ourselves, at least they give a way to do it. They do care, as they do, and their way has aided many men as verified through millions of anecdotes, even though it doesn't help all. Leftists tell you, "tough shit, ya bastard." Denying that conservatives treat men as human is something that's going to keep men conservative.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/25 09:54 AM
32

I think it's sad that we have to make it about women simply to be heard. I have a feeling you were published, if you didn't self publish as I'm not familiar with the site, because you blamed patriarchy. We shouldn't have to commit hate speech against ourselves, or diminish our own issues by mentioning women's, to be heard. But you're missing the main reason males moved right. It's because the wider left hates them, we are the oppressors, we are the bourgeoisie to them, they cannot see us as syst…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/25 06:17 AM
0

I'm centrist, there is no flare for it What is left wing about making men pay more than their fair share? That is conservative, making men provide.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/25 05:58 AM
5

Life (Looks at conscription laws) Life, mostly.
/r/MensRights22/02/25 04:41 AM
1

What wouldn't they post? The MR sub has a long approval queue, did they inform you?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/25 04:37 AM
1

That's not better for society, women need to pay their share for equality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/25 04:29 AM
1

The problem with most democrat men is that they believe they are privileged oppressors. They don't see anything wrong with the male condition, and the ones who do mostly see it from the feminist standpoint. As a centrist, I don't feel the democrat party deserves help at this point. I mean, the Libertarians don't care about most of it, but at least they know men are not some bourgeois class. But I would would encourage left wing MRAs to make content for the MRM, maybe the democrats will listen, m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/25 04:28 AM
136

The reports serve to keep a record, those are important. You may still go the Civil route. If there is no evidence, then there's little they could bring to a criminal court. This is not just about you. You may feel nothing has been done, but a report was made, that is data, more data showing the plights of men increases the awareness of male issues and rights.
/r/MensRights22/02/25 03:56 AM
1

I said people have a right, not that they always get it.
/r/MensRights22/02/25 03:02 AM
1

Oppressor/oppressed hierarchies are leftist by their nature. Egalitarianism is neither a core of leftism, nore unique to it. Most conservative groups and philosophies believe in equality or Egalitarianism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/25 02:58 AM
1

TLDR https://youtu.be/hcvXpdr0AlM?si=ILHDqwkECXeP6ieF
/r/MensRights22/02/25 02:40 AM
1

Regardless, this situation is not an issue of men. People have a right to do whatever they want with their money.
/r/MensRights22/02/25 02:29 AM
1

Marxism is not egalitarian, it insists there is a hierarchy. Marxists might feel they appropriate it, but the SJW definitely utilizes bourgeoisie/proletariat framework that came directly from Marxism. Strongly influenced by feminism, the SJW often puts themselves as the proletariat meant to destroy the bourgeoisie, the male. There are no other philosophies which contain that notion or Hierarchical idea.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/25 02:26 AM
1

Dating is the means to a goal, not the goal itself.
/r/MensRights22/02/25 02:04 AM
1

SJW is left though, it's just Marxism with extra steps.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/25 12:26 AM
1

Republicans supported men in those years buddy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/25 12:25 AM
1

You are epitomizing the reason Trump won. You are rejecting everyone right of Marx. The SJW movement followed feminism, they made men out to be bourgeoisie, and themselves out to be the proletariat. They deny any actual male issues, and they blame men for the ones they do recognize. It drove everyone to the right.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/25 12:24 AM
1

Women are also told they must nurture. This is not a masculine or feminine thing. This is not a situation in which someone feels entitled to someone else's money.
/r/MensRights22/02/25 12:07 AM
1

Probably do the same things I do now. Talk shit on reddit and act like ima write a book that I'm never going to start.
/r/MensRights21/02/25 11:54 PM
2

No is not an option. You will become a woman. How would you help the MRM?
/r/MensRights21/02/25 11:44 PM
36

FOR THE MEN'S RIGHTS MOVEMENT
/r/MensRights21/02/25 11:43 PM
1

Nevertheless, this isn't a men's issue.
/r/MensRights21/02/25 11:41 PM
1

Those are not exclusive to strangers. If the situation was reversed you'd be complaining that they're sexist because they're making you conform to a male role by providing for your father. This is not an issue of men.
/r/MensRights21/02/25 11:25 PM
-1

Everyone does it, and it's not entitlement. It is morally evil to obligate someone into altruism or charity.
/r/MensRights21/02/25 11:04 PM
3

That testosterone increases aggression.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/25 08:16 PM
6

No, there is a theory which has never been proven, and has a lot of holes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/25 07:58 PM
12

The most aggressive demography in any country or group of people across every time period is young men around the ages where testosterone is highest. That's because society from the beginning has been gyno-centric, and no one bats an eye at female aggression. But there are studies, commonly named here, showing that they are more aggressive.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/25 07:33 PM
1

Faaaaaaaabuuuloouus
/r/MensRights21/02/25 06:29 PM
6

Off the top of my head, it may have been solely a marketing issue.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/25 05:42 PM
0

75% chance to win are good odds.
/r/MensRights21/02/25 04:56 PM
4

This is not a MRM issue, it's not a male issue at all. You can't make her pay, it's her money. She is under no obligation to do so. I'd say, since you're paying the majority share, stop paying and use that money to move him to you.
/r/MensRights21/02/25 04:32 PM
2

Most Women weren't complaining about lonliness until recently. Men were, that is the reason it was considered a male lonliness epidemic, until the last couple years. It pretty exclusively affected males. You are being pedantic.
/r/MensRights21/02/25 04:26 PM
18

He is, in fact, a victim by the word's definition. Admitting victimhood is the first step in healing.
/r/MensRights21/02/25 04:14 PM
54

She abusively projected her misandry until the victims became exactly what she insisted they were. Out her on social media and get therapy.
/r/MensRights21/02/25 04:14 PM
2

I am unsure as to the point of your argument. Lonliness is not a individual issue with the level it's at, and it hasn't been one among males for decades.
/r/MensRights21/02/25 03:58 PM
0

There was a male lonliness epidemic for decades, now it's just a lonliness epidemic. It's been declared in many places, NY, for example.
/r/MensRights21/02/25 03:19 PM
2

I'm not going to bother responding to the incredibly misinformed anatomy you're insisting upon in your first paragraph. Be careful when following guys on YouTube ranting about the world’s state, inflation, wars, or antinatalism. Beneath all that frustration is usually just a man lamenting his rejection by women. These guys aren't dropping any wisdom—they're just pissed off that they got deselected by females. So when you stumble upon those antinatalist or doom-and-gloom channels about corporate …
/r/MensRights21/02/25 08:49 AM
26

That be the ego, yes.
/r/MensRights21/02/25 08:27 AM
2

No one's defending anything in Afghanistan except the Taliban. They took all the military grade weapons from anyone willing to do something. They did it in the 70s/80s too. It's what happens when barbarians are left to their own devices. They fuck little boys and, I wouldn't put it past them to bring back harems and eunuchs. They do not serve your sexist argument.
/r/MensRights21/02/25 08:06 AM
5

"Stole his seed." Just doesn't flow off the tongue very well.
/r/MensRights21/02/25 06:35 AM
4

Please don't write attractive long ass, quotes right at the chest/breat area of t-shirt or tops. Please do not write anything on the boob area of women's clothing.
/r/MensRights21/02/25 06:20 AM
2

Tell them we want doublets and mantles back. While you're at it.
/r/MensRights21/02/25 05:19 AM
6

Do it on MensLib, see how long it takes those feminists to ban you. I got a few comments in today, weren't even bad btw, just a different perspective on masculinity, before they permabanned me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/25 05:11 AM
2

Yes, sky is blue, grass is green. That is page one of the feminist's playbook. 3rd wave feminists are Marxists through and through, and they see men as their bourgeoisie.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/25 04:47 AM
3

Ima need a better TLDR.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/25 04:44 AM
1

If you cannot be professional about it then it's best to keep it to yourself irl. I used to work with feminists and we would have conversations about it. And, while completely unprofessional for our job duties, it was professional for the topics.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/25 04:37 AM
6

Why was this funded, like, I have controversial opinions about circumcision, but why were we funding Mozambique at all? Just let South Africa have it.
/r/MensRights20/02/25 11:10 PM
1

Are you sure you're not just bored?
/r/MensRights20/02/25 11:07 PM
1

There is coherency, you just refuse to understand that you're objectively wrong about the nature of men and women.
/r/MensRights20/02/25 09:30 PM
1

What logic are you using to think those are mutually exclusive?
/r/MensRights20/02/25 09:21 PM
-1

I think he did it himself because he knows he's wrong, a hypocrite, and he's afraid of genuine exposure.
/r/MensRights20/02/25 08:39 PM
22

You're speaking to a choir, go tell the feminists that. They're the ones always going on about PaTrIaRcHy and tOxIc MaScUlInItY.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/25 07:46 PM
1

I find that incredibly amusing.
/r/MensRights20/02/25 07:17 PM
12

-Starts off triggered af -insists they aren't triggered -proceeds to be triggered throughout the video Cope harder bruh, you're why we need to censor pill people, your nihilistic black pill ideologies are objectively false, and harmful to humanity, especially the male gender. It certainly doesn't help the male lonliness epidemic, or the MRM. And I'm someone who's said censorship is evil ffs. The gall of you to proclaim i was defending women, when I was arguing your idealogy, is the peake of trig…
/r/MensRights20/02/25 06:17 PM
1

Hear me out. Gift the money right before they hit that point. Then you might just pay taxes on gifts and they don't get anything.
/r/MensRights20/02/25 05:49 PM
1

Because it's relevant. The child now has half their medical history missing. It's the mother's fault, and it is morally wrong to further force men into something, like creating a database, it should only be voluntary. The child is a secondary victim of systemic discrimination of men by women.
/r/MensRights19/02/25 06:42 PM
0

Because it's relevant, but the focus is men's rights. A child deserves to know if their perceived father is a victim of their mother's paternity fraud. At that point they should ask their mother.
/r/MensRights19/02/25 06:38 PM
0

Yes, it is currently a privilege of women to unilaterally make that decision, by discriminating against men.
/r/MensRights19/02/25 06:31 PM
1

As i told OP, normal men do genuinely care about more than sex. Yall are lonely because all you want is carnal pleasure.
/r/MensRights19/02/25 06:28 PM
1

If a woman makes a unilateral decision to bring pregnancy to term, and the biological father does not, and cannot, share in this decision, he should not be liable for 21 years of support... autonomous women making independent decisions about their lives should not expect men to finance their choice. -feminist Karen DeCrow
/r/MensRights19/02/25 06:20 PM
1

Tell me you've never met a woman without telling me. Where on earth have you gotten the idea that women don't lust after men? That is the most absurd take of you people.
/r/MensRights19/02/25 06:02 PM
11

It should be an option if it's viable, yes. You should also be able to do it on demand. Men should not have to raise children who aren't theirs, not without consent.
/r/MensRights19/02/25 05:57 PM
1

He's likely a black pill person, they all come out around 12am est.
/r/MensRights19/02/25 05:22 PM
1

It's fake because every woman outside the rarer sexualities, also have sex for fun and pleasure and for the relationship. There's nothing to suggest women dislike men outside certain feminist circles. As i saud to OP, if men only committed to romance for sexual gratification, we all would be fucking apes and only other people for mating, that is what animals do. Women would only stick to non humans and objects as well if your ideas were actually true.
/r/MensRights19/02/25 05:14 PM
-2

This false narrative around women is why you black pill people never get laid.
/r/MensRights19/02/25 03:53 PM
4

They just don’t have the same libido for the male body that men have for the female body. I'm saying you are wrong, i have been saying you are wrong from the beginning. You might disgust women because you are driven to romance by sexual gratification. That disgusts the vast majority of people.
/r/MensRights19/02/25 06:57 AM
3

men are so inherently repulsive to women that they must complete a full checklist just to be tolerated. But you're wrong, believe it or not, it is not normal for men to be driven to romance by sex. And women are not some prudes who hate sex. Your entire argument hinges on the idea that men seek romance solely for sex, which is false.
/r/MensRights19/02/25 06:38 AM
1

You're right to what? This video makes the assumption that men are animals solely driven to romance by sexual gratification, not even mating, but just for the cum. It's certainly not pro man, it's not even pro human. If men really were like you say, every one of us would be fucking chimpanzees like the elephants fuck rhinos, and the dolphins who masturbate with fish corpses.
/r/MensRights19/02/25 05:21 AM
-14

Let CS Lewis introduce you to Eros, instead of whatever hedonistic thing you think love is, before you downvote me again. https://youtu.be/YljTz0Kkdvg?si=krhKSNd49xwDqbqc Men don't just love for sex, and the idea that even a straight man cannot get sexual gratification from another man is false, as seen everyday some get it from actual animals ffs. Eros is something that only an individual's Romantic preference can provide however, it is not sex alone. Sex is part of romance in the state of Eros…
/r/MensRights19/02/25 05:19 AM
-26

I am a man, and it's very easy to tell that you're new to philosophy and have never felt love, seemingly any love, not just Eros. If you agree with or made that video. I see you're also active in an anti natal sub, I feel my take on you is spot on, definitely an efilist if not a hedonistic one. Very basic.
/r/MensRights19/02/25 04:53 AM
-22

For the love of God, don't encourage him.
/r/MensRights19/02/25 04:52 AM
-45

That is a shitty take that says a hell of a lot more about you than men. You literally sound like the feminist's stereotype of an incel. Your hedonistic ideas have no place in dating and men's rights. Quite frankly, you're just wrong both morally and objectively.
/r/MensRights19/02/25 04:29 AM
1

No, their dictionary definitions specify superiority. Sexism is not necessarily a belief in superiority. Most anti male sexism is not based in the idea that women are superior to men, though many do believe that. But in the idea that males are in a bourgeois class and that women, the proletariat, are destined to destroy them, by virtue of being the proletariat class. It's hatred for the sake of hatred.
/r/MensRights19/02/25 04:23 AM
1

Both of you are wrong. It is a specific form of sexism that is categorized by the idea that men are superior. Misandry is a specific form of sexism that is defined by the idea that women are superior.
/r/MensRights19/02/25 04:07 AM
3

Ugh, leftist propaganda. Let me guess, J Peterson, Blaire White, Brett Cooper, and Lauren Southern are all Alt-Right sensationalists bent on recruiting men to the nazis. 🙄 TLDR "Alt-right," is basically the leftist version of, "woke." After reading: Everything you have said has been told to men by those called, "alt-right."
/r/MensRights19/02/25 03:51 AM
0

It's only the feminine who act like predators. All violence outside self defense is feminine. It's emotion driven, and completely illogical, ergo it's feminine in nature.
/r/MensRights18/02/25 10:33 PM
0

He's probably a MGTOW, they're the male version of 4b. What would you have this place do? Feminists subs allow 4b post and comments.
/r/MensRights18/02/25 10:30 PM
5

You can't claim to be for equal rights when you want segregation at best.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/02/25 10:27 PM
1

The only good feminists are the ones joining in the fight for men, the Karen DeCrow's, and Christina Hoff Sommers', for example.
/r/MensRights18/02/25 10:25 PM
1

What does this have to do with men's rights or issues? It's very much untrue btw.
/r/MensRights18/02/25 08:48 PM
-13

Were they stumbling, or were you stifling their art? Are you sure you don't just prefer feminine methods? Were the men actually saying, "ugh ugh," because they forgot a line?
/r/MensRights18/02/25 12:49 AM
5

They're not, every woman I've dated has been hunting or fishing. Idk where people get this kind of information, it's completely alien to me, I grew up in the southeast US.
/r/MensRights16/02/25 07:11 PM
7

People got over it, it's just MGTOW for women.
/r/MensRights16/02/25 06:20 PM
5

Then rehash the original argument, it is very circular.
/r/MensRights16/02/25 05:13 PM
3

Strongly disagree, are you calling me old?
/r/MensRights15/02/25 06:21 AM
5

Bruh, do you think young people don't listen to music? Everyone on the planet has heard that song, and only kids might not know the implications.
/r/MensRights15/02/25 05:54 AM
5

Now, if someone be breaking their fingers and wrist in a punch, that actually is technique, like not knowing how to make the fist.
/r/MensRights15/02/25 01:36 AM
1

Yes
/r/MensRights14/02/25 06:43 AM
1

Naturism is empowering.
/r/MensRights14/02/25 06:13 AM
1

You're being downvoted, but that Japanese pornography is a hole other level of depraved.
/r/MensRights14/02/25 04:30 AM
-4

Because, contrary to popular opinion, the vote was only tied to the draft in the 60s, at least in the US, and only very loosely.
/r/MensRights14/02/25 12:50 AM
-2

It happens daily.
/r/MensRights13/02/25 11:39 PM
-41

In her defense, it was likely a lesbian joke.
/r/MensRights13/02/25 07:30 PM
6

Get therapy. Closing oneself off from other people will stunt the grief and social life.
/r/MensRights13/02/25 07:19 PM
12

What would this have to do with men's rights or issues? What would this have to do with 4b?
/r/MensRights13/02/25 04:06 AM
5

https://youtu.be/ZKe8BxvjZIs?si=9DUiYVRsYalQcTiE
/r/MensRights12/02/25 06:45 PM
1

Yes, I don't know where you got the idea that it's from men, anyway.
/r/MensRights12/02/25 06:18 AM
11

No, no let them do it, then sue for copyright. Become the real predator.
/r/MensRights12/02/25 01:26 AM
1

Feminism literally takes from the communist handbook. Even Feminists from communist countries have said, as far back as the 60s, that western Feminism goes too far, and reminds them of their home politics. We are their bourgeoisie, to be utterly destroyed by them, the proletariat.
/r/MensRights11/02/25 03:40 AM
1

Feudalism is not capitalism, that's insane logic.
/r/MensRights10/02/25 07:35 PM
4

Everyone has masculinity and feminity, it's not either/or.
/r/MensRights10/02/25 07:26 AM
1

The proof can be seen in every discourse about conscription, and every politician who has been against it. When the collective hears that conscription might be outlawed, they come to its defense. The only ones who don't have it are ones with no military, and at war collectives always go in its favor. This is common knowledge.
/r/MensRights09/02/25 07:23 PM
1

Every democratic system allows for this via the vote.
/r/MensRights09/02/25 07:03 PM
2

Yes, we were. The larger collective is not against conscription, never had been.
/r/MensRights09/02/25 06:59 PM
3

Because there is no true individualistic society, and a collective has deemed conscription a necessary option. Not some cabal of bourgeoisie. Should that exist, their power still comes from people.
/r/MensRights09/02/25 05:50 PM
11

This is not new information, the narrative of the education crisis has always been that boys have done well in the STEM areas. It's never been considered, "all over." It's still 100% a crisis. The main thing that's needed imo, is for the arts and social sciences to welcome and focus on the masculine, realism, aestheticism, theme forward reading, etc. That is not to say they should abandon the feminine, expressionism, emotion forward reading, etc.
/r/MensRights09/02/25 05:39 PM
10

I think society’s denial of feminine violence is a major issue. Violence is not inherently masculine, masculine Violence is always self defense, criminal Violence is always feminine. To self defend is logical, and pragmatic, to be violent outside this is illogical, emotion forward, and clearly communicative; all criminal Violence is feminine, and it's only denial to think otherwise. This criminal is a, "she." She has chosen the feminine gender, and has exhibited toxic feminity. I quote myself.
/r/MensRights09/02/25 05:27 PM
1

HATRED
/r/MensRights09/02/25 05:24 PM
1

That was objective. It is fact that some feminists do criticize feminism, and they used to be common. Intersectional feminism allowed the extremists to take over. The common feminist either repeats Dworkin's ideas or Hook's ideas, both at least infantilizing males, if not hating males. Common feminism wasn't always sexist, though there were always sexist feminists. When you have an affinity for a movement, you will judge it positively on the whole That is also objectively false, you are can easi…
/r/MensRights09/02/25 05:06 PM
6

In capitalism people can decide that themselves, they need need no collective.
/r/MensRights09/02/25 05:00 PM
7

Men didn't fight for men, that was a major issue. The men who did fight were ignored. And most believed the feminist propaganda that said women had it worse. Saying the truth isn't hatred. Perhaps because it was a different time but if the definition of rape had been changed long ago many men would still be alive today, It was changed, perhaps it still needs changing. This would have been back in the 70s and 80s.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/25 08:01 AM
9

Meh, she fought for men and boys when no one else would in at least 2 crises, so if she held against changing definitions before I was even born, I say it can be overlooked.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/25 07:45 AM
7

TLDR Capitalism isn't anti-left. That attitude is considered extremist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/25 07:39 AM
1

The dictionaries are clear on the definition we're talking about.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/25 06:08 AM
2

Sometimes.
/r/MensRights09/02/25 12:09 AM
16

99% of Feminists are never right in what they say about the patriarchy. Ever. It doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights08/02/25 11:34 PM
14

You're the kind of anti-capitalist the conservatives think of as a stereotype. I doubt you even know what it is. You're acting like a feminist with their patriarchy.
/r/MensRights08/02/25 11:14 PM
18

That's stupid, capitalism didn't always exist, war has.
/r/MensRights08/02/25 10:56 PM
16

Do you want MGTOW labeled as a terrorist group? You're being obtuse. Cartels are violent organizations, whom it can be said have conducted terrorism.
/r/MensRights08/02/25 10:18 PM
54

This cannot be blamed on capitalism. This is a core of society itself. There are no economic and political systems which haven't done this.
/r/MensRights08/02/25 09:47 PM
1

I don't find that surprising for the period.
/r/MensRights08/02/25 09:44 PM
-2

They agreed with it, they are complicit.
/r/MensRights08/02/25 06:38 PM
29

You should read -Who Stole Feminism- by Christina Hoff Sommers. Fair warning, one of the criticisms of against her is that she was against expanding the definition of legal rape, that is seen in this book. It's also something her detractors like to exaggerate, they say she wanted some rape to be legal, but that's untrue, she, like many others in the time, believed that oral sex, for example, was sexual assault different from rape.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/02/25 06:35 PM
19

You won't know unless a woman with short hair gets rejected for the same job. I'm saying that unironically, professional standards aren't sexist if they're equal, they're just irritating.
/r/MensRights08/02/25 05:55 PM
8

You're being toxicly masculine.
/r/MensRights08/02/25 05:51 PM
26

One need not hide the boners, they're natural, and that's why our pants are loose. They're teaching shame. Everything below that is just straight up man hate. The assumption that males are dangerous fools is sexist. I shall read no further than #7. You should be ashamed of yourself. No good sex educator would agree with this. Sue Johanson was one of the first ever to state, "men are allowed to say no." Men need to be told that there's no shame in saying no themselves, not be blamed for criminal …
/r/MensRights08/02/25 05:37 PM
2

It's all over myths, fiction, and non fiction. "Poison is a woman's weapon"
/r/MensRights08/02/25 10:42 AM
1

She was always suspicious of the feminist movement, never proclaimed herself feminist.
/r/MensRights08/02/25 10:19 AM
29

France literally banned it because the government thinks it'll break up too many families, that is very telling.
/r/MensRights08/02/25 06:20 AM
1

I'm still arguing that that's a mindset of one with body image issues.
/r/MensRights08/02/25 03:50 AM
-2

I think that particular kind of discourse is pretty rare, I usually see penis discussions around people being nervous about how to please, or someone finding a size un-aesthetic, hence the comparing to boobs.
/r/MensRights08/02/25 03:38 AM
-3

No, it's definitely body image issues, like women and boobs.
/r/MensRights08/02/25 03:31 AM
1

Wait until you learn about alimony.
/r/MensRights08/02/25 02:03 AM
33

TLDR, So why wouldn’t I want to be a woman? Well that’s gay first of all lmao but I think it’s just the p Would you rather be a gay man, or a straight woman?
/r/MensRights08/02/25 02:02 AM
2

You can not, "gotcha question," a feminist, they're dogmatic about patriarchy, and they'll just end up there.
/r/MensRights08/02/25 01:19 AM
0

As a declaration, nothing more and nothing less.
/r/MensRights08/02/25 01:16 AM
7

Report her.
/r/MensRights08/02/25 12:43 AM
20

She was open to it, but advised caution anytime she spoke about it. If i remember correctly, she compared it to speed dating early on, but even speed dating has more intimacy. Idc enough to look back though.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 09:37 PM
-1

Body image issues include projection.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 09:37 PM
53

By the end of her life, even Dr Ruth Westheimer was critical of online dating.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 08:01 PM
15

It's not, that's just a body image issue some of us have.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 07:37 PM
1

Is neurodiversity a movement?
/r/MensRights07/02/25 04:36 PM
1

Feminism isn’t nazisism, that's too grossly a false comparison. They're mostly communists.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 04:31 PM
12

That's what the lawyer is for
/r/MensRights07/02/25 10:24 AM
1

The answer has always been money. The glaring concern should be why the society is giving women so much privilege as to be able to take the cost of higher education, while leaving the males to trades and menial labour.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 06:14 AM
1

I'm aware of feminism's history. It's more politically savvy to turn an enemy to one's cause. History can easily be forgiven for the potential of a strong block. It is quite literally self sabotage to not even attempt to turn your enemy.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 01:56 AM
3

Up to the 70s DeCrow's style of feminism was popular then.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 12:31 AM
6

I legitimately doubt many voted at all. The Aurelian and Epictetan stoicism commonly seen in the circles doesn't generally create political participation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/02/25 12:26 AM
5

They're neutral. What exactly do you know about the pill people? Where has your experience with them come from? I am the last person to defend pill people btw, but you seem to be coming on with a whole lot of unusual thoughts on them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/02/25 12:22 AM
17

I don't understand how this post gets a pass, but if I censor all the important details telling people where my picture might be from and who said what, it gets removed. Where are these alien cultures that raise boys to feel superior? I've never seen one, it's usually the opposite.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 12:05 AM
-6

It can be argued that the MRM came before feminism. How is this a feminist article? OP did not relate this to men's issues, in order to do so he'd have to show that it's some kind of double standard or that it effects men at all.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 10:11 PM
-13

What does that have to with this article?
/r/MensRights06/02/25 10:06 PM
-17

What does this have to do with men's rights or issues?
/r/MensRights06/02/25 09:51 PM
1

Idk, I'm just saying that's a commonly stated stereotype.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 08:49 PM
0

I don't usually, but if I hear dogma I question irl, I have no shame whatsoever bringing out the personality I exhibit on reddit.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 07:55 PM
3

Feminism allowed the extremists parts of the movement to take control. Every movement has extremists, including the MRM. Most of feminism wasn't hostile to males until the last few generations. It wasn't always fundamentally hostile, and the existence of Karen DeCrow and Christina Hoff Sommers prove that, DeCrow's style of feminism was the most common feminism in the 70s, for example. We are only shooting ourselves in the foot by avoiding the promotion of good feminists.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 06:53 PM
1

If you're not a feminist, you wouldn't be someone who'd go back to feminists with different ideas from the common ones, would you. Why is that even on the table? They have their problems, we have ours. Why shouldn't it be on the table, as it is now, feminism largely works in direct opposition to fixing male issues and promoting civil rights for men.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 06:30 PM
1

Because, unlike the vast majority of modern feminists, these people are actually egalitarian. They recognize the problems men speak on as systemic issues without blaming the men or feeling offended that maybe men aren't some privileged bourgeoisie, and should their feminism become the popular feminism, MRAs, and feminists could actually work together. Sommers and DeCrow even advocat(ed) for men's issues. DeCrow being supportive of financial abortion, and Sommers fighting for boys and men in the …
/r/MensRights06/02/25 06:08 PM
1

Opinion difference.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/25 05:23 PM
1

It is harder to be brave in public, I made a blog for a day before deleting it because I didn't want my name potentially engorged in the controversy of Men's Civil Rights.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/25 05:22 PM
1

masculinity is present in women's bodies That was my argument, yes, part of it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/25 05:14 PM
10

I don't think the MRM is in the position to skip awareness activism, not when male hating feminists solely control the gender narrative.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/25 04:45 PM
4

Social media can be though, spreading awareness is activism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/25 03:42 PM
1

"And?"
/r/MensRights06/02/25 02:14 PM
6

It's actually very progressive, feminism is a harmful and entrenched part of modern society’s infrastructure.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 10:32 AM
12

That can also fall under gossip, yes, to a certain degree. The criteria for gossip really being talking about people, usually negatively, in a group. Whether it is or not doesn't change the objectively feminine nature of the behavior.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 10:15 AM
3

I shall take a guess that you are a feminist, who may have been intrigued by the, "sympathetic," (radical feminine supremacist) bell hooks to check on the men? Usually that's the case when someone comes here defending modern feminism of any kind.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 10:07 AM
3

And?
/r/MensRights06/02/25 10:02 AM
2

And?
/r/MensRights06/02/25 09:54 AM
9

It is objectively feminine behavior. The criteria for feminity is, being attributed mostly to women and, mainly, forward emotion, and social communicative activity, with subtle to no practicality, and lesser importance on the physical. The behavior described is intrinsically feminine because of its forward emotion, social requirements, and complete lack of pragmatism or anything related to the physical. It is behavior that can be seen to fall under toxic feminity, regardless of the gender exhibi…
/r/MensRights06/02/25 09:51 AM
13

Yes, yes it is.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 09:44 AM
29

Because they're all dead, retired, or called conservative by the mainstream.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 09:38 AM
18

Sexist comments as described in the post fall under gossip. Even if it didn't, it is still an exclusively feminine behavior that is exhibited by the majority of women, and few men.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 09:17 AM
4

I don't think pill people even vote, there's too much stoic influence for them to be politically active. I think you give them too much thought.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/25 08:52 AM
17

Bruh, theories are not facts.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 08:47 AM
1

Is it though? My headphones play dnd sessions.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 08:40 AM
3

Measures should be hard, objective, and decided by the justice system equally for everyone. That's why the justice system exists.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 08:38 AM
14

Yes, and ice cream causes crime too because crime increases with ice cream sales. The only fact is that criminals exist, toxicly feminine behavior doesn't change that, it isn't an indication of criminal behavior. Most of it is exactly what feminists want, men showing their emotions and avoiding the stoicism they hate. You're just angry that the emotions contain opinions that can damage female privileges, especially those under the "patriarchy" feminists cry about.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 08:29 AM
75

The funny thing is that most men don't talk shit about women, rarely about anyone. It's part of masculinity. Gossip is toxic femininity.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 08:25 AM
1

That article is about getting comfortable with lonliness.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 06:02 AM
1

What is stoic about that? Just further proves Nietzsche's view of Stoicism to me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/25 12:22 AM
4

It's considered part of the punishment, unofficially.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/25 12:18 AM
127

You don't have to apologize for supporting feminism. Go back and promote the feminists like Karen DeCrow, and Christina Hoff Sommers, and Camille Paglia. It doesn't have to be the way it is.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 12:07 AM
2

Masculinity by definition is made of behavior usually male. But as it is a set of non physical characteristics, it is not exclusive to men, really not so even if we include physical characteristics considered masculine, one of them being muscular, it is not exclusive to males. Even as babies, we see boys tend to be drawn to things that are physical, and pragmatic. Whereas girls we see to be drawn to very social and things that can be seen as emotional. That's what has defined things that are fem…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/25 10:47 PM
1

The original saying is still true though, it's not an observation of the male condition.
/r/MensRights05/02/25 10:29 PM
1

Masculinity isn't physical characteristics, it's behavioral, psychological. Testosterone is the main ingredient that creates the physical characteristics of males. It only lightly effects the behavioral characteristics of masculinity imo.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/25 07:47 PM
2

You clearly don't know what masculinity is. Feminists caused men to seek external validation by separating men from each other. It was Feminists who invaded male spaces and caused the great isolation. Masculinity is natural to males, females, and the non binary. It's what creates the deepest friendships, the strongest loves, and the most beautiful art in human history and society. Aestheticism is intrinsically masculine. Realism is intrinsically masculine. Mathematics All the greatest philosophi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/25 07:16 PM
3

It's called satire you pleb.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/25 04:34 PM
2

Nagging, as i said, and this has been studied the ones who've refused to go to the doctor only went to make their loved one shut up.
/r/MensRights05/02/25 02:04 PM
2

Literally anything else, as I've said
/r/MensRights05/02/25 01:52 PM
7

Same logic women use.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/25 01:51 PM
5

I don't think you're very familiar the topic, or human nature. You will be very frustrated when you meet a stubborn male and try this.
/r/MensRights05/02/25 05:33 AM
1

Not at all, I'm not even sure where you got that quote. The saying is, “No man is an Island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the Continent, a part of the main.”
/r/MensRights05/02/25 04:36 AM
3

Have you ever told a stubborn person that they're stubborn? Newsflash! They have this tendency to double down. Actually, nagging them has been seen as the most effective method to get them to go. But calling it stubborn will 100% make them double down.
/r/MensRights05/02/25 04:29 AM
4

You seemed to miss the point, if I said you are hysteric, you wouldn't go to the doctor, you'd be offended, a normal person would. Telling men they're being stubborn is going to do the same thing, like telling an angry person to calm down. Like anything would be more effective, literally anything.
/r/MensRights05/02/25 03:15 AM
11

They're not though. Up until today they promoted patriarchal norms, and the toxic masculine behavior of ignoring feelings. Like, men were there getting emotional about the sexism we experience, and they censored it because the guycry creator thought it was wrongthink. That is the pinnacle of patriarchy and toxic masculinity. I participate there. Men are better off going to subs that feature true equality like the relationship advice sub.
/r/MensRights05/02/25 03:08 AM
10

It was only today that that sub uncensored the word, "misandry," they are very feminist, men's lib, and quite hostile to the male condition imo. They are against patriarchy and traditional masculinity, yet, encourage toxic masculinity by censoring the ones who don't cry in a feminist manner. Better off going to sex or relationship advice.
/r/MensRights05/02/25 03:03 AM
4

You do have to make friends. Philia, a level of friendship that was fairly exclusive to men, CS Lewis talked about it a lot. In a radio lecture, that is free on YouTube, he noted that it was becoming less and less common for men to have deeper friendships in the 50s and 60s. To take yet another pot shot at feminism, this is about the time men started losing exclusive spaces due to feminist political activities. But anyway, I've found what he says about philia to be true. Male friendships, contra…
/r/MensRights05/02/25 03:02 AM
1

Why do you think leftism is synonymous with Marxism? This only proves my point, people who proport the patriarchy don't see men as human, they see men as the Bourgeoisie, the enemy the proletariat shall destroy in violent revolutions. People like OP refuse to acknowledge systemic discrimination against men, because we are men, and the privileged, the bourgeois. People who promote the patriarchy like OP are nearly always either collectivist authoritarians using it to grift power, or sexists man h…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/25 01:02 AM
9

No, it's ever changing, and the goalpost moves in every argument about it to suite the needs of the sexist proporting the patriarchy. When called out the sexist will default to the dictionary definition and the arguments restart and repeat. It's a boogeyman, and all-encompassing evil, used to hate males, as i have said many times.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/25 12:17 AM
27

We actually don't know the numbers. The victims don't come out, and female predators are impossible to entrap in the dateline style. But I'd guess it's probably 1 in 3 men who've been in an uncomfortable situation with a grown woman while they were underage. Just an observation, from talking to men irl.
/r/MensRights05/02/25 12:12 AM
6

If I told you you're hysteric in this way, would you go to the doctor?
/r/MensRights04/02/25 11:58 PM
11

That is odd, they may have been making sure it really did start at 18 though.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 11:43 PM
22

Feminists are the problem though. Like, they hide behind the definition containing equality, but gone are the days of Karen DeCrow and Christina Hoff Sommers' feminism. Today's feminism has a basis with Andrea Dworkin, Bell Hooks, Gloria Steinem, and even some Valerie Solanas. Men aren't human, they're either infants to be brainwashed, predators, or mutant women (Valerie Solanas quote). They'd rather be mauled by a bear, one of the worst deaths known to man, than be in the presence of the human …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 10:55 PM
1

The detractors of the MRA are usually everything the MRA says they are. Aside from people like Jo Rogan and Ayn Rand.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 10:11 PM
2

Center-Right if you want to get technical. Tis the position of the majority of MRAs in my experience. Your friend sounds insufferable, even most feminists still agree that there are conservative feminists. There's no reason there wouldn't be MRAs across the spectrum. The usual advice is that politics needs to remain professional, one should not be friends with people who only speak about politics, that would be a peer or colleague.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 10:10 PM
5

I don't read tabloids, I have no idea who these people are.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 08:14 PM
31

Pretty stereotypical actually, it's just not popular to say that.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 07:08 PM
17

It's called sarcasm, sir, lighten up.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 06:17 PM
34

Yes... because accusing people of being stubborn is such a proven way to get them into therapy.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 06:13 PM
15

My mother always told me to go Dutch. As in everyone pays their own bills. For starters.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 06:11 PM
1

We are beginning circular arguments.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 05:22 PM
1

They were pretty kinky in the middle ages tho.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 04:01 PM
1

I don't know the whole story, I'm more inclined to say the nunneries are accepting women, and the regulars aren't accepting anyone. This can be for numerous reasons.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 12:02 PM
3

Somers puts the downfall of feminism in the 60s because that's when extremists like Valerie Solanas, Andrea Dworkin, Gloria Steinem and Bell Hooks were active and beginning to take hold of feminism as a movement. Somers herself advocated for everything you mentioned in the time periods. You also didn't address the fact that rote memorization was the norm for most of the history of education and boys did just find, so I don't think it's a recent increase in sitting and learning that's responsible…
/r/MensRights04/02/25 11:12 AM
14

Technicalities don't matter, the conclusion is satirical.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 10:12 AM
3

You seem to have the exact negative idea of masculinity I'm talking about. It does matter, because if it's not biological it can be changed through societal perception, as in my example with the perception of "gifted" children. That is an uphill battle that has been completely bypassed. Christina Hoff Sommers, for example, looked into schools that have a more masculine friendly pedagogy. Guess what? Girls and boys did better all around, they were also more advanced than schools with government s…
/r/MensRights04/02/25 10:09 AM
2

Whether it's biological or not doesn't matter. It's something that happens. The problem is the feminists who want to pathologize boys instead of changing the common pedagogy to increase masculine engagement.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 09:45 AM
2

That's common to masculine minds, yes. They lean towards the practical and physical.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 09:38 AM
3

By perpetuating the myth that it's inherently biologically more difficult for a 5 year old boy to sit still than a 5 year old girl, we make it even more difficult for those boys. We lower our expectations and give up on them. I legitimately believe that what you're saying is harmful. No one here is perpetuating that myth. There is a war on masculinity, it's not just giving up on boys, school has become a place that stifles and promotes the stifling of any masculine mind, especially in creativity…
/r/MensRights04/02/25 09:28 AM
3

Not that it matters, anyone can have masculine or feminine minds, but there's there's only a war on masculinity.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 09:13 AM
41

Exactly, women kill more men every year than sharks do in every 10. Downvote me all you want, but it's true. Sharks are safer than women.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 09:11 AM
9

They've usually been through something and imprint their abuse on everyman, big and popular feminists like Dworkin and Bell Hooks did that.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 09:10 AM
1

I like his view of stoicism, very overrated.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 08:48 AM
4

They do though, have you ever seen kids play? Even in toddlers, masculine creativity can be seen in kids gravitating to shapes and blocks, while feminine creativity can be seen in kids gravitating to dolls. It's not just socialization.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 08:43 AM
31

Either directly through the stomach, or through the back to get to the stomach, they like to pull out the intestines first, which doesn't always kill. Sometimes they'll maul the face first. Grizzlies have been known to take out the intestines and snack on their food, not have it at once. When this bear vs man stuff came out I was completely flabbergasted that some were serious about it. Like, I'd rather drop the soap daily than go through that, I don't think they realize exactly what that situat…
/r/MensRights04/02/25 08:02 AM
29

Feminist Dworkinism is very common. She has an infamous quote about mothers and sons being potential rapists. Yes, to most feminists today you are not human, you are either an infant to be brainwashed or a predator, and to many you're still a predator even if you're brainwashed.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 07:55 AM
2

There is no dictionary definition. As I said to OC, masculine creativity tends to involve rough play and strong imaginations, especially in kids. Masculine creatives tend to enjoy very practical and physical stuff, I'd say that's fairly imperative to the masculine creative. That doesn't mean that a masculine creative will only do physical activities. It's the rough and tumble childhood play that became the basis for CS Lewis' Chronicles of Narnia, he said so himself. Masculine writing tends to b…
/r/MensRights04/02/25 07:35 AM
12

It has an ever-changing definition to suite the needs of feminists to provide an ever present enemy, particularly in men. Imo, such a word cannot be defined, definitions must be clear and relatively static.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 07:09 AM
1

Keep reading
/r/MensRights04/02/25 05:47 AM
1

enveloppement I think i understand how women feel about the word, "moist," now.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 05:15 AM
7

Idk we can get into the thick of it and compare abuses/unfairness/sexualharrassment/inability to independently exist safely but I’m still waiting on more details from you about anything you claim. Why do women do this? This is not a victim victimhood competition. Men are disenfranchised, we have issues that are completely ignored because women are always in front of the politicians complaining about things that, half the time, don't even exist like the wage gap. Masculine creativity involves thi…
/r/MensRights04/02/25 05:10 AM
4

Firstly, what kind of teacher are you? Entomology is the study of bugs, etymology studies words. Patriarchy, literally, by its root, refers to the male gender, and is exclusively used in the negative, as stated. And the feminist "definition" is not common, people outside gender studies and politics don't know it. You are sexist in just using the word as feminists use it. It's not the fault of men or some patriarchy that you can't get a promotion. Don't take your daddy issues out on over half the…
/r/MensRights04/02/25 04:32 AM
5

The solution is the same as it has been, give boys the same special treatment girls have, and change common teaching practices to support masculine creativity, for starters. To be clear, I respected your opinions until you decided to come up on a sub for male rights claiming that the patriarchy is a reason for the male education crisis. Patriarchy being an inherently hostile term against males by its usage and etymology. And in the way you used it, it's undeniably sexist male blaming.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 04:10 AM
7

Especially when you call the the great enemy to unite the women, "pAtRiArChY" and always talk about, "ToXiC mAsCuLiNiTy," both completely undefined and directly tied to the male gender by their very etymology.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 04:06 AM
1

Pizzey was never feminist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 04:03 AM
6

Hooks is just like Dworkin, every boy is either an infant to be brainwashed or a predator. That is literally a paraphrased Bell Hooks quote. The fact that most feminists don't even know who Karen DeCrow is, or who Christina Hoff Sommers is (and many who do dislike her for defending men), is all one needs to know to state that feminism is sexist against men, they'd choose bell hooks as an example of a non man-hating feminist ffs.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 04:02 AM
7

Do men have no right to question dehumanizing rhetoric? You are on a male rights sub? Wouldn't you protest if I said It's safer for men to be alone with a shark in the ocean than with a woman in the sea? Men can be sent to actually die. At the whims of the government, men have no control over women’s anything, that's nothing but fear mongering feminist propaganda.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 03:57 AM
8

Gloria Steinem manufactured the anorexia epidemic for nothing but clout and power, and to hate men, js. She is a radical, man hating, feminist. She is believed to have a hand in the boy's education crisis as well.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 03:52 AM
5

Modern intersectional ideas have protected and made popular the extremists from the 80s, to a point where equality feminists like Paglia and Sommers are outcasts in feminist circles.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 03:49 AM
4

Feminism caused all the left's hatred of men, they're the problem. Why would you need Feminism to tell you that you have value as a human being. Ayn Rand, Emerson, Jesus, Thoreau, Sam Adams, Kant, Nietzsche, literally anyone could have taught you this without yelling against the existence of your gender the whole time. Kant and Emerson can have told you to stop worrying about power and prestige, any number of people could have, CS Lewis, Benjamin Franklin, everyone i already mentioned, people yo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 03:43 AM
5

Because the right fucking listens without being condescending or having a, "you're the bourgeoisie and we don't care," attitude. Or outright blaming men for our problems, and every evil in existence. Etc. The left barely cares in labour issues, and that's all most are willing to talk about with men, some feminists might talk about pAtRiArChY and tOxIc MaScUlINiTy, and they're just sexist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 03:32 AM
2

It's literally been called feminists studies many a time, unironically.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 03:31 AM
6

Women have always been above or equal to men, feminist revisionism doesn't change that. A simple look at historical rules and documents show that. Get out of the feminist bs. Patriarchy is a hostile term used to spread hatred of men as the new bourgeoisie, case in point. This discussion is about men's issues, not patriarchy.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 02:41 AM
6

Patriarchy doesn't exist. It's certainly not a cause of the education crisis in men and boys. This a perfect example of why the Patriarchy doesn't exist. It's an all-encompassing evil used to promote sexism against men. There's book after book, study after study, from unbiased, non-feminist sources, since the 90s stating that boys are disengaged in their education, and it's caused by a lack of masculine friendly pedagogy. Not by their behaviors, that is a symptom, definitely not by some undefina…
/r/MensRights04/02/25 02:23 AM
1

Worse, he's a scam artist. Like his school is an actual MLM Scheme. Technically a pyramid scheme. And he's a terrorist sympathizer who denies historical facts in favor of Taliban propaganda.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 02:15 AM
2

You want to uplift men? Let's talk about wages. Let's talk about body shaming. Let's talk about homelessness and unions and veteran affairs. Let's talk about easy access to birth control and abortion. Let's talk about paid parental leave for everyone. Let's talk about childcare subsidies. I am legitimately, with my whole heart, all about it. But if you want to limit this conversation to a mean post a woman made, you've already lost my attention. You want to address issues that are being addresse…
/r/MensRights04/02/25 02:03 AM
2

Feminist revisionism is deeply pervasive, and when one looks at historical documents and events, you really can't see it, it was obviously worse, but the idea that women had no rights, were slaves, were sex objects, clearly wasn't popular in most of the times. For example, We see in Irish penitentials that the feminist's idea of the dark ages is very false. A woman wasn't a man's property, he was just responsible for her, there are very few penitentials that tell priests to make women go through…
/r/MensRights04/02/25 01:53 AM
3

Grass is also green.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 01:41 AM
-3

I'm not going to call it sexism, there tends to already be more women's shelters and care among the catholics. You know, especially in the nunneries. Like, catholicism has always been big on sex segregation.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 01:35 AM
3

Depends on location, you can fit 3 Indias in the US, my state is only slightly smaller than England.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 01:31 AM
2

A non misogyny version of mgtow is what i imagined mgtow to be.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 01:29 AM
2

That do be called the PTSD buddy.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 12:34 AM
7

Yet if one suggests male only gyms, they are a sexist, even though female only gyms are fairly common.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 12:24 AM
3

Congratulations Keimo, you are only worth 50000$ and an ankle bracelet. /s
/r/MensRights04/02/25 12:19 AM
6

Even in the 80s and 90s when parents were deeply involved, on average, the issue was the pedagogy. Parents have just given up fighting, boy friendly programs and activities are still shut down quickly; from something as basic as recess, to programs equivalent to girls on the run. Feminism's hand in ending these programs can't really be denied, it's well documented, Christina Hoff Sommers discusses it extensively. Even something as small as renaming and changing the rules of dodgeball to somethin…
/r/MensRights04/02/25 12:09 AM
16

Patriarchy isn't real, it's literally the feminist's bogeyman, used to explain everything and anything bad. It's an all encompassing evil that cannot be defined and is used to unite modern feminists by hatred, specifically against males.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/02/25 11:32 PM
9

TLDR, everything has its political uses.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/02/25 11:07 PM
24

Are you advocating for multiple adults in classrooms where there's a pandemic of female on male rape against children? Are you advocating for men to use the buddy system? For men to have each other's backs? Do you tell the people you advocate to that men, masculinity, etc, are threats they need to watch, while ignoring the female perpetrators of the same crimes, which some data proports to be much more equal outside biased feminist sources? Do you promote exclusive spaces for men, safe spaces fr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/02/25 10:19 PM
3

You should try Transcendentalism.
/r/MensRights03/02/25 09:37 PM
2

Too upbeat to be stoic. Especially Aurelian and Epictetan stoicism that too many in these circles enjoy.
/r/MensRights03/02/25 09:36 PM
7

https://www.pediatrix.com/about/for-media/news/debunking-the-myth-that-boys-develop-slower-than-girls#:~:text=There%20is%20a%20common%20myth,Dopwell%20noted. The vast majority of pediatricians, who are the experts in these things. Even the resource that do recognize some developmental differences between 2-18, say it's negligible. Some say girls have a delay up until 6 years old, and even they state very small numbers. It's largely deemed a myth. The only time we hear it is from feminists, and f…
/r/MensRights03/02/25 09:22 PM
9

That's a feminist myth to support female supremacy and keep boys behind. There are few to no experts who agree with it.
/r/MensRights03/02/25 07:53 PM
5

It was a crisis before, it's been a crisis since the 70s/80s. Multiple books have been written, and they're actively suppressed by feminist and women's lobbies. For example: https://youtube.com/watch?v=hj719mKBIB8&si=lC2ZnSvQRIPPR1aY This was written in the 80s/90s, published in the 90s, and updated in the 2000s.
/r/MensRights03/02/25 07:48 PM
8

Feminine friendships are short and shallow anyway.
/r/MensRights01/02/25 11:16 AM
1

Lower the bar for a quick lay.
/r/MensRights31/01/25 02:14 AM
4

Ernest Belfort Bax https://youtu.be/j3dBOydwYfI?si=lMobqxdSHwYr8deK
/r/MensRights20/01/25 07:41 PM
1

Lawyer up.
/r/MensRights20/01/25 02:41 AM
1

Miscarriages come out on their own, that's what makes then Miscarriages. You only need certainly operations for the leftovers.
/r/MensRights19/01/25 03:47 AM
5

Deadbeat dads don't change that there are discriminatory courts.
/r/MensRights19/01/25 02:49 AM
3

I think there's a major difference between art and pornography.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/25 12:02 AM
4

In that case you have the penis, not a vagina you're just calling a penis. It is definitely something you might want to mention by a third date, definitely before sex.
/r/MensRights18/01/25 10:27 PM
67

It's cause a handful of movies made a, "don't drop the soap," joke and few people have actually seen a real depiction, or thought critically, about what actually happens.
/r/MensRights18/01/25 04:28 AM
5

I think you're underestimating your fellow man.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 11:57 PM
3

I think this solution is the same to that problem.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 11:46 PM
11

The solution is more men in college taking education degrees.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 10:49 PM
3

You're reaching buddy, she didn't give you a playboy, it's a novel.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/25 10:46 PM
6

If you get lighter punishment for the same crimes as the counter population, that is privilege. And it happens, in this case, because of the idea that men are worse, an idea perpetuated namely by feminists in today's age.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/25 09:54 PM
6

Being male is making life harder for men, that's the problem with gender studies and social sciences, it's feminist coded to see the male gender as bourgeois. Ergo, men aren't discriminated against and have aren't systemically oppressed. These schools have ignored male issues that feminist don't talk about forever, and feminists deny that there is systemic discrimination, and deny their own role in it. No one's but the left MRAs are asking for benefits, the vast majority of MRAs are centrist or …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/25 07:10 PM
1

But how does this relate to the company?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/25 06:40 PM
5

Toxic masculinity doesn't exist. The traits you describe have been seen in an equal population of women. Toxicity is Toxicity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/25 06:26 PM
1

What is the point of the meetings though?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/25 06:25 PM
2

My female coworker used to call this phenomenon, "the power of the pussy."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/25 06:23 PM
1

Toxic female behavior involves murder and calls for genocide.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/25 06:19 PM
0

They're only 11-12 states who don't have it.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 06:16 PM
3

OP doesn't deserve your hate. He aptly summarized what you've said.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 05:59 PM
1

The ERA is law, did you not listen in school? Has been since before I was born. The vast majority of states already have it. There will be no further effects. We need to add amendments to the ERA for gender neutral language and/or protections for men.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 05:54 PM
2

You are correct, I was going by memories of clickbait headlines.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 06:50 AM
1

You are correct, she is alive. She did, at one point, identify as a feminist however.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 06:48 AM
2

Boo, allow thou clickbait.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 06:22 AM
2

Where were the parents? He was just living with the teacher?
/r/MensRights17/01/25 06:18 AM
7

We know which feminists are with us, and most of them are retired, dead or silent now. Christina Hoff Sommers only gets on Twitter once in a while, and she had that interview last year. Karen DeCrow is dead. Camille Paglia may as well be be retired, and she's a hard-core libertarian type. Erin Pizzey died years ago. Warren Farrell still considers himself feminist. We might count Richard Reeves, but he's more men's lib, and I feel like he's a grifter. Cassey Jaye still speaks on occasion, but her…
/r/MensRights17/01/25 05:02 AM
2

You're refusing to see the discrimination of men, especially by feminists, it is especially problematic as you're in gender studies. Of all schools, gender studies aught to be the one to take the discrimination of men seriously. The school itself is discriminatory because it clearly denies the discrimination the women's lobby's and feminism has perpetrated against the male gender. You have not studied men in gender studies, you studied feminists theories.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 04:45 AM
3

Gender studies is well known to be feminist coded. You have been here for a while, and every week you ask the same things, and are given the same answers and research. And every conversation you end up doubling down on your biases, you are not interested in helping men. We cannot work with feminists like you, mainly because you refuse to take accountability and responsibility for discrimination and other sexism against men.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 01:54 AM
11

Most European countries have strong immigration controls, and enforce them. They have far stricter immigration requirements than the US, and enforce them. The US already has some of the most relaxed immigration restrictions on the planet. We take about 4 times as many legal immigrants every year than the entirety of Europe combined. When we say, "illegal immigration crisis," i don't think the news articles are telling you that it's millions of undocumented immigrants. Like, it's not just a coupl…
/r/MensRights17/01/25 01:49 AM
3

There are issues in the justice system that are clear favoritism in for women. Women are exempted from selective service by virtue of the uterus, men's lives are considered disposable. Women have surpassed men in nearly every aspect of life. Yet continue this idea that men are not discriminated against, most women are feminists, and even use said privilege to keep, or push, men down. You think men are above women because feminists control the narrative around gender, and keep any groups who aren…
/r/MensRights17/01/25 01:25 AM
26

And men are, for some reason, considered the most privileged class by the left.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 01:12 AM
4

So men must continue being the second class beings we've been for milennias because women had to ask permission for stuff 100 years ago? You're doing exactly what OP is complaining about.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 12:53 AM
9

That's untrue In my experience. Europe is only further left on a handful of issues, such as health insurance. There's quite a few issues the US is further left on, like immigration.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 12:21 AM
30

It's not just feminism, feminism is just leftist. It's the left. They all subscribe to parts of communism and intersectionality dealing with hierarchy and privilege, the ol' proletariat vs bourgeoisie. The few leftists who don't believe in this are called conservative by the wider left. Men, as a gender, are considered the most privileged class, men are part of the bourgeoisie to the left.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 12:09 AM
3

We didn't have the same rights, but it was more equal than today. Today women have more rights and privileges than men.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 12:03 AM
-4

If someone is name calling, they are trying to start a fight. This has been a universal social phenomenon across time and cultures.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 09:59 PM
-14

If there's a fight they'd normally be arrested.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 07:41 PM
-5

Normal men don't name call, especially not each other, you need new friends. Only men with unregulated emotions who want to fight do so. It is rare, that's why it's always a spectacle on TikTok. Such people are normally arrested.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 07:15 PM
2

You'd need to do it in high-schools.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 07:14 PM
1

No woman like that deserves a man. That is sexism.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 07:07 PM
7

It's not women, it's modern feminism. And it didn't just negatively effect men. Gloria Steinem, single handedly, fabricated the anorexia epidemic. The current education crisis goes back to the 70s and 80s, and to this date feminist women's lobby groups will sue if they think boys are getting access to exclusive help, while fighting to maintain the exclusivity of things like Girl Scouts. https://youtube.com/watch?v=hj719mKBIB8&si=lC2ZnSvQRIPPR1aY You can also look at the community highlight, wher…
/r/MensRights16/01/25 07:05 PM
22

I think it's a good idea for trans people to identify themselves as trans very early in a relationship, before the first date. You cannot complain when someone freaks out because you identified as someone with a penis or vagina, and they find out you have a vagina or a penis. That's just common sense. It's not just that either, men and women are biologically different, trans men and women, cannot do with cis men and women, the things that cis men and women can do with one another. It's extremely…
/r/MensRights16/01/25 06:53 PM
62

Feminists and Feminist groups have a long history of lies and revisionism for the sake of maintaining control.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 05:25 PM
6

Barbie is a hit or miss, depending on your spot in the political spectrum. Libertarian types seemed to enjoy it across the aisles in the gender wars.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 05:38 AM
17

Warren Farrell said, "gyno-centric patriarchy."
/r/MensRights16/01/25 05:23 AM
-1

I'd still bet money it was mostly sex stuff.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 05:17 AM
2

If it sounds like a sex thing, it's probably a sex thing.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 04:32 AM
1

https://greenhow-hill.org.uk/sowerbytown/old/history/henpecked.html Idk if they were advocating for henpecking, seems like they were in for a boy's night out, away from their wives. Or it's a sex thing, idk.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 03:42 AM
22

Had a coworker who was very outwardly feminist. Like, "men this, men that," and everything. She wasn't a psychopath, she knew what she was saying is sexist. But she was also a self-proclaimed libertarian who hated capitalism. So, very contradictory.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 02:00 AM
8

Reeves replaced Farrell as Feminism's Trojan horse.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 12:18 AM
3

I just got banned from abusiverelationships for being on here. Don't even need to talk about men's rights or issues, it's active censorship, and literally all we're asking for is to be treated fairly, like humans. Appearantly it's misogynistic.
/r/MensRights15/01/25 07:53 PM
14

Masculinity doesn't make one avoid help, that is a feminist myth.
/r/MensRights15/01/25 05:33 AM
-2

It's not revisionism, it's a modern fact, the right may only see people as laborers, but at least they see men and women as equal in the roles they want for them. The wider left really does see males as less than human. The worst feminists are the ones who'd be considered far left, ie Valerie Solanas, who literally called for the genocide of males. The wider left cannot be worked with.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/25 10:34 PM
2

The right has my respect because they see men as people, equal to women. The wider left would celebrate if every member of the male gender died tomorrow. As a centrist, that makes the right far easier to handle. You can't work with a group who sees you as sub-human.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/25 10:20 PM
6

"What gets easier to pick up the heavier it becomes? A woman." "Is google a man or a woman? A woman of course, because it won't let you finish your sentence without making a recommendation." (#) it's not about you "Women are more dangerous than sharks." (#) not all women "Women are like cats, you never know if you're about to hug or get beaten." (#) it's not about you
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/25 08:35 PM
-6

The vast majority of anti male sexism happens on the left wing. They see males as sub-human. Right wingers just don't want penises in women's bathrooms. They see males as bigger females.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/25 08:23 PM
73

Yes
/r/MensRights13/01/25 08:19 PM
6

I don't think you understand what rubber necking refers to.
/r/MensRights13/01/25 08:06 PM
53

Not surprised. Male "beauty standards" are way more insane than womens. The "ideal" male physique as seen in movies, magazines, sports, etc.. is only attainable through intense discipline in dieting, years upon years of consistent weight training, and genetics. And dehydrating oneself to accentuate the abs.
/r/MensRights13/01/25 06:53 PM
26

Women rubber neck as much as men.
/r/MensRights13/01/25 06:41 PM
165

There's alot of gay MRAs, here too. I'm bi, you don't need to be straight to see that men are inferior when it comes to our rights and human condition. All men, not just straight men.
/r/MensRights13/01/25 03:52 AM
26

I nearly had a stroke reading that post, and I'm not seeing how it relates to the title.
/r/MensRights13/01/25 12:42 AM
10

Don't apologize to them, they should have read your post.
/r/MensRights12/01/25 08:32 PM
6

Well corn is a staple food of American cuisine. Thoroughly American, like tomatoes. /s You look like an idiot censoring the word, "porn." I am not anti-porn, relationship Expert, Dr Ruth Westheimer said it's fine as long as everything is consensual and it's not taking absurd amounts of time from one's life, like making people late for work.
/r/MensRights12/01/25 08:28 PM
2

Well corn is a staple food of American cuisine. Thoroughly American, like tomatoes.
/r/MensRights12/01/25 08:23 PM
11

Why do people like you think being forced to work for their place in society is a privilege? Women should man up, and grow a pair. Take care of the boys and we'll be homemakers.
/r/MensRights12/01/25 07:22 PM
7

If they ask conservatives they'll get logical and more compelling answers. Everyone outside Fox News doesn't want that.
/r/MensRights12/01/25 06:05 PM
135

Feminists always be reaching like that. It's always patriarchy, it's their immortal, all encompassing evil that they use to blame us for every problem in existence. We really need to reclaim the word. Literally not a single person is stopping a woman from entering a dangerous job, except herself.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 09:05 PM
1

Remember, men are the ones who NEED a to-go bag.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 08:46 PM
11

Sounds like depression.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 08:36 PM
1

Are some sects of feminist thought harmful? Yes? Are the voices of those sects amplified by the oligarchs as a means to drive wedges between us? Yes. It's the majority. It's every women's lobby. I do both brother. You're just wasting your time here.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 07:44 PM
1

Look up the critical analysis of capitalism/imperialism You cannot deny that it's the sexist and hostile nature of feminism that keeps MRAs on the defensive. You're choosing to ignore the issues that matter. It wasn't "stolen", it was just used as a descriptor to talk about the system anti-social men created to ensure their power. It was a word with positive connotations before feminism, they stole it. Why do you insist on talking down to people here, and not convincing feminists to stop the ant…
/r/MensRights11/01/25 07:35 PM
1

Feminists utilize the language feminists stole to demonize all men. Wouldn't they simply say, "oligarchs," or bourgeoisie if they didn't hate men. They stole the word, "patriarchy," not these special men you talk about. It's feminists who use it exclusively in the negative, a word, by its etymology, is directly connected to all males. So if you want the MRM to work with feminists, you need to convince them, not men.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 07:18 PM
1

It's the feminists themselves who framed it like that, not these bourgeoisie anti-social men you keep going on about. Feminists corrupted the word patriarchy, they are the bourgeoisie in this discussion, no anti-social men did so. A simple look at history proves that.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 07:12 PM
1

Patriarchy itself is a feminist issue, it's nothing but a sexist buzzword. If you want feminists and MRAs to work together, it's feminists who need to change.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 07:04 PM
1

Then go tell the feminists to take responsibility for their own issues instead of blaming and hurting men.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 06:34 PM
1

You want men to exclusively do something about that? That would require that men bow down to, or be enslaved by feminism. That is why feminists are the immediate threat. Feminism is too extreme to do that. Maybe if Christina Hoff Sommers' feminism, or Karen DeCrow's feminism was the mainstream again, but they're not.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 06:29 PM
1

You literally promoted bell hooks.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 06:14 PM
1

Free women free men - Camille Paglia
/r/MensRights11/01/25 06:11 PM
1

Why do you defend feminists then? They are the highest patriarchal institution. They utilize the privileges patriarchy gives them, exclusively, to harm members of the male gender. You cannot come here talking like a feminist, and expect to be welcome.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 06:07 PM
14

As they should be, they didn't even do it right.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 06:01 PM
1

Were they KKK just smokescreens to black people?
/r/MensRights11/01/25 05:56 PM
1

Sounds like something an anonymous email HR would want to read tbh.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 05:55 PM
1

Doesn't matter what you think, your rhetoric and actions speak for themselves.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 05:44 PM
1

BP has very poor philosophies, cannot reccomend. Basically nihilism, strongly disagree with the principles. It creates ideas that enslave the person, certainly doesn't free anyone. You can't help those in it, it's a chosen set of philosophies, not depression.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/25 05:36 PM
1

Yes, it's clear that you think you are superior by spreading awareness of the evils of patriarchy. And when multiple people have explained to you that it's offensive, you just insist upon your superiority. You are so sure about the modern feminist's dogma that you refuse to entertain any other idea.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 05:34 PM
1

You're patronizing is what you are doing, and refusing to listen when others share concerns and issues.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 05:30 PM
1

That's debatable. You'll find no sympathizers among men while you refuse to see the misandry in modern Feminism, certainly not when you encourage it with hostility against men. Not only do you insist on blaming men, a hatred on it's own, you are using the feminist word, "patriarchy," it's sexist and beyond offensive, you might not think you're hating men, but talk like that is hatred, regardless of what you think it is.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 05:08 PM
1

Why do you hate men so much? Why do you defend the institution that, at best, wants to enslave us? You're obviously a radical feminist, ffs, you're blindly promoting bell hooks. Have you ever even heard of normal feminists who actually defend men and fight for equal rights? Camille Paglia Christina Hoff Sommers Karen DeCrow Cassie Jaye Warren Farrell
/r/MensRights11/01/25 04:49 PM
1

Ehhhh this is demonstratably false. It's factually true. Mary I Elizabeth I Elizabeth II Maria Theresa Catherine the Great Margaret Thatcher Indira Ghandi Etc. No, it should be focused on building broad coalitions and community though. I don't like how leftists activist organize either. Yet you refuse to listen to the issues of men, you just blame them, there can't be a coalition under those circumstances. bell hooks calls for women to fight for the rights of men. Bell Hooks was an extreme misan…
/r/MensRights11/01/25 04:35 PM
1

In my experience, they seem to be trained largely on erotica.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 02:33 PM
20

Not really. My parents taught me separate finances are good for equal partnerships. And going Dutch on dates, also good for equal partnerships.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 09:51 AM
2

That sounds like an unprofessional HR nightmare in my field.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 09:45 AM
1

This isn't a feminist sub. We're highly critical of feminism. Many are staunchly anti-feminist. MRM literature includes, but is not limited to, The War Against Boys- Christina Hoff Sommers Who Stole Feminism- Christina Hoff Sommers The Boy Crisis- Warren Farrell The Myth of Male Power- Warren Farrell Free Women, Free Men- Camille Paglia The Four Loves- CS Lewis The Manipulated Man- Estar Vilar The Man-Not- Tom Curry Considering your post history, I'd reccomend you removed yourself from gender po…
/r/MensRights11/01/25 09:35 AM
1

Old news. https://youtu.be/OhFgFDmaXHI?si=ptFZ7aZEZItyMFcU https://youtu.be/zB6h6tzi-oc?si=9Yj1XRdAZb6txqy8
/r/MensRights11/01/25 08:59 AM
8

Never heard of him. Red pills and black pills do often contain extremely unhealthy philosophy, imo. You'd have to be blind to think boys are doing fine in schools, and sexist to think discrimination doesn't have something to do with it. I also don't trust anything written by anyone who writes the word, "attractive," in the same title as, "trump and biden."
/r/MensRights11/01/25 07:40 AM
1

I want you to be a man, use your public speaking skills, and replace that shitty text-to-speech voice.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 07:30 AM
1

Maybe the liberals need to realize that labels matter, and being called gay can cause harm to that person's romantic life if they're not gay.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 07:24 AM
1

Male friendship is the deepest connection. As CS Lewis said, Platonic Love (philia) is the happiest and fullest kind of love. Men can not speak for years at a time, then suddenly meet up and speak with the same familiarity as the last time. It can be very emotional. From what I've seen, women can have that kind of friendship; but their connections, while emotional, are usually extremely shallow.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 07:21 AM
1

And? Who is most likely to send other men to war? Women in government are just as likely as men. Do you think discussion and activism should only be relegated to fighting for some anarcho-communism? That would be completely out of the way for the goal of men's rights. The individual misandry must be addressed first. Any system built, or growing with modern Feminism's idea of men will only not change the condition of men. It must be dealt with.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 07:04 AM
1

But you are, you've stated, at least once, that men hurt men the most. And it's a completely false, misandrist, statement. All it says is that you have very strong biases against the male gender.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 06:44 AM
3

Probably Cassie Jaye's TED talk. https://youtu.be/3WMuzhQXJoY?si=HU_ucpd5Ow4koNxm
/r/MensRights11/01/25 06:39 AM
1

Who owns the business ventures that require uneducated labor? It was the businessmen and women who can use uneducated labor promoting policies to help boys and men in the crisis the most. It was, again, feminists and women's lobby groups who fought tooth and nail against anything that would help boys and men. In gender discussions feminists and intersectionalists hate on men, not the rich, not the rich men, not the 1%, not politicians, they do not discriminate in rhetoric or actions.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 06:29 AM
2

No, it didn't. Feminists lobbies, in fact, fought against legislation, and private endeavors, to help boys in education. If you insist on believing in this idea of patriarchy, then you should know that feminism and intersectionalism are the most patriarchal institutions in existence. They generally contend that men are the most privileged group, and are at fault and deserving of anything bad that comes our way, especially if a non male hurts men.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 06:03 AM
1

Never heard such a phrase.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 05:47 AM
2

Feminism literally caused the current education crisis with men and boys. Js.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 05:39 AM
4

What do elevators, public use of technology, and changing a tire have to do with being male or masculine though? Like, elevator etiquette is clear, first on-last off and stand by the buttons. It's not some masculine philosophy. It's practically a rule in some countries.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 05:34 AM
1

It's not surprising from Libya though. North Africa literally ran the global slave trade hundreds of years before, throughout, and hundreds of years after Atlantic slave trading. Slavery is pretty much like alcohol for them. You can make open markets illegal, but you just created a situation like prohibition in America.
/r/MensRights10/01/25 05:06 PM
1

Androcide
/r/MensRights29/12/24 07:27 PM
1

Why would i fight against an all-ecompassing evil that doesn't exist? And supposedly benefits me if it did? Whereas feminism, and many woman's lobbies, have actively worked against things that help men, solely because they help men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/24 06:39 PM
15

Either affirmative action needs to end, or there needs to be affirmative action for men.
/r/MensRights29/12/24 06:33 PM
3

All the MRM and Menslib literature can be found online, used, for discount prices. Idk how to you'd break the bank. Reeves is a Trojan horse for menslib-feminism. I'd reccomend Christina Hoff Sommers' -The War Against Boys-
/r/MensRights29/12/24 06:30 PM
3

Liars be lying.
/r/MensRights29/12/24 06:18 PM
2

That depends on the feminism. Solanas hated men for the fact of being male. She said feminine men were jealous of women, and called all men defective women. This is common among modern feminist leaders imo.
/r/MensRights29/12/24 06:14 PM
6

That's a lie. You're using the same fallacious statistics they use, and you're making fallacious arguments.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 09:34 PM
12

It's a false belief. Physical differences are highly varied and dependent in individuals. You're making the same arguments evangelicals make to keep women in the kitchen.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 09:27 PM
9

The kind of supporter that tells men we're potential rapists. Isn't worth their weight. You're neither wanted nor needed. Misandry has no place in men's rights.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 09:18 PM
2

That's being pedantic.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 09:14 PM
23

You're just an extremist, why are you even here? Real feminism supported men's rights goals. Karen DeCrow even supported financial abortion. Only people like solanas and Dworkin said the things you and most modern feminists say. You obviously don't see men as human. Feminists have been equating men to animals for decades, but that's just another piece of women's privilege.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 09:05 PM
26

Feminist's revisionism. You keep insisting on your false victim status, it's the reason feminism isn't taken seriously anymore. Women have the most privilege and rights of any group.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 08:51 PM
18

Women are more dangerous than sharks, probably moreso than men in that context. Women have killed 5x as many men this year as sharks have killed people in the last 5. Women abuse and assault men hundreds of times more. Sharks are safer than women. Women are violent. Men are the peaceful sex. We came up with great and good philosophies in history, and male violence mostly happens in self defense. Female violence is most often started by the females. Women are more violent and dangerous than men. …
/r/MensRights28/12/24 08:26 PM
15

Christina Hoff Sommers put all the blame on Gloria Steinem. Steinem utilized sensationalism and lies to get famous, and Sommers isn't wrong. People closely connected to Steinem, Dworkin, and other radical feminists pretty much took over women's lobby groups from Karen DeCrow's style of feminists in the 80s.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 08:20 PM
40

Saying you're weaker than the average man, is not sexist. Saying every man is a potential rapist is blatant sexism. Quite frankly, women are more dangerous than men. We are factually safer alone with a shark in the sea, than a woman at any time.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 08:06 PM
1

Were they hiding it before?
/r/MensRights28/12/24 08:02 PM
4

Cooking fresh foods too. No high processed stuff. The privilege of the pretty does wonders for the mind.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 08:01 PM
1

Teeth, maybe. Fertilizer, probably not. This was not unique to soldiers in the times.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 06:42 PM
3

That is for the individual. God never said we can't make it illegal.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 06:31 PM
2

A fine of at least $10,000 At least five years in prison Lifetime bar on holding any federal office Reparations
/r/MensRights28/12/24 06:27 PM
8

You should read Christina Hoff Sommers.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 06:24 PM
8

"Becoming" Read -Who Stole Feminism- by Christina Hoff Sommers. Shit's been going on since before Gloria Steinem. And on much larger levels.
/r/MensRights26/12/24 07:50 PM
3

Why is there a bounty? Is that even legal? Looks like a student film, are their names not attached?
/r/MensRights25/12/24 09:43 PM
59

Valerie Solanas is taught as a feminist. https://www.khoury.northeastern.edu/home/shivers/rants/scum.html
/r/MensRights25/12/24 09:16 PM
13

It's legal by court order only in France, Germany, Switzerland, and more.
/r/MensRights25/12/24 08:01 AM
3

Remember all. You are factually safer alone with a shark in the sea, than alone with a woman in the ocean.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/12/24 11:29 PM
2

Let me tell you what we tell women and everybody else. "Fool you once, shame on them; fool you twice, shame on them; three, four, etc, times? Congratulations, you have a type."
/r/MensRights24/12/24 06:59 PM
-1

"Right," is a strong word. She makes a lot of claims.
/r/MensRights24/12/24 03:03 AM
-13

They're still around, unfortunately. I despise the stoicism within the movement. Always taking credit for things real activism did, all stoics are like that.
/r/MensRights21/12/24 09:06 AM
2

Just you Barbers only do buzzcuts and black hair.
/r/MensRights21/12/24 08:28 AM
1

Posts go into a queue and must be manually approved, from my understanding.
/r/MensRights21/12/24 12:39 AM
10

They'll get money for the extra years by working no?
/r/MensRights18/12/24 06:50 PM
16

It doesn't work though, neither in castration, nor deterrence. If they're going with something named cruel and unjust by the west, they should just bring slavery back. Beccaria reccomended that as the ultimate deterrent. we can't wait till proven guilty Oh. Nvmd that just goes to show how immoral feminism is.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 04:48 PM
5

Why does Malta need 69 representatives in it's government? It's over 15x smaller than Delaware, they don't even have that much in their entire legislature. Sounds like a waste of taxes.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 07:46 AM
1

It's a yes or no question bruh, that has nothing to do with it.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 06:20 AM
1

On the planet
/r/MensRights18/12/24 06:07 AM
15

We have to complain and write en masse. And complain to the BBB too.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 05:23 AM
-14

It's the stoicism in them. Never fails, can't change them, like the stoics they always try to claim mgtow as the reason for any victory, when it has won zero. But he is right about the school shooter. Edit. Yall can downvote me all you want, but that MGTOW just proclaimed that 45 years of MGTOW stopped feminism, a delusional claim, and such plagiarism is common of the stoic mind.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 04:43 AM
20

People don't write manifestos and commit terrorism just because. She was politically motivated and wanted to be a martyr.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 04:40 AM
1

Stoicism is overrated, especially that from Aurelius and Epictetus. They (stoics) like to say they don't have power when they do. Worst of all, they take credit for people and ideas that other philosophers and philosophies made. Ayn Rand, Cicero, Jefferson, etc. Just because they knew of the stoics, and stoics like their ideas, doesn't mean those people and ideas can be attributed to stoicism and be called stoic.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 04:17 AM
1

Red pill is considered a men's rights group, despite my personal feelings against them. The MRM still doesn't have the tools to counter radical feminists, and your premise that the manosphere, which the MRM is technically under unfortunately, is both more popular, and better at taking down female power is absolutely absurd. No manosphere speakers are popular outside the conservative and normal MRM circles.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 04:00 AM
1

Is this sub representative of men's rights as a whole?
/r/MensRights18/12/24 02:55 AM
1

If anything the MRM made the manosphere to counter radical feminism.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 02:49 AM
0

If you think the manosphere is all self-help platitudes then you probably haven't really explored or understood the width of topics in the community if you believe that is the extent on it. What do you think it is? Because that's literally all the speakers that the manosphere consists of do.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 01:14 AM
3

Conservatives are just as gyno-centric as progressives. The manosphere is popular because it's all self-help platitudes and advice. Not because it bridged some gap between conservatives and the MRM. Most MRAs are conservatives.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 12:52 AM
4

Literally all of that can arguably fall under either conservatism or the MRM, or both. You seem to think Richard Reeves is an MRA.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 12:39 AM
10

Where TF do you think the manosphere got all the information? It's only the MRM and regular conservatives to pick it from.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 12:15 AM
1

Is it not dramatic prose?
/r/MensRights17/12/24 11:33 PM
2

# Believe all men.
/r/MensRights17/12/24 11:13 PM
3

There were exploitative assholes before capitalism
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/12/24 10:53 PM
3

No, we don't. The US dollar is worth less than the Euro, suggesting that we do not, in fact, have the strongest economy.
/r/MensRights17/12/24 06:37 PM
25

Men are not the problem, never were. That idea has always been feminist propaganda.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/12/24 05:00 PM
1

You're not big on freedom are you?
/r/MensRights17/12/24 04:53 PM
1

I'd vote Tulsi Gabbard, she would have won by an actual landslide even before she was pro 2A.
/r/MensRights17/12/24 04:50 PM
0

Deportation, not immigration.
/r/MensRights17/12/24 04:46 PM
5

Mass deportation, not immigration. It's not racist to want the same laws places like England, Ireland, France, and Germany have, and to have those laws enforced. The US has some of the most relaxed immigration laws in the world.
/r/MensRights17/12/24 04:43 PM
14

No. Americans protect our freedoms with guns. French protect their labour rights by shitting in the Seine. Germany also banned home paternity tests.
/r/MensRights17/12/24 04:26 PM
2

Which part?
/r/MensRights17/12/24 04:18 PM
3

You realize that you only see rape cases against women is because men cannot, legally, be raped in your country right? That suggests that it's a common belief. How many men go missing every day? Are mugged? Murdered? Etc. It has always been just as safe for women, as men, across the globe. Wasn't there a case where a woman kidnapped a boy, and HE was charged for rape? Not to long ago.
/r/MensRights17/12/24 04:13 PM
43

Karen DeCrow's feminism was about equal rights. Christina Hoff Sommers' feminism is about equal rights. Camille Paglia's feminism is about equality. Modern Feminism is about hating men, keeping men down, and convincing women that they have no rights or privileges, when they have more than men. Posts pointing out female crimes are important because there's this idea, caused by feminists, that men are evil, men are rapists, #"kill all men" etc. It must be brought to attention that women are just a…
/r/MensRights17/12/24 04:01 PM
5

Shame on you, men have no obligation whatsoever to protect. That was a social contract under the feminist's idea of patriarchy. Rights are not based on oppressions. You're born with them they are natural, "God given." Women are just as safe as men outside after 6. Men are simply taught to be braver. Men, in your country, are actively being denied the natural right to innocence. They are told, in the law, that no woman can commit a sex crime against a male, and no male can be a victim of a sex cr…
/r/MensRights17/12/24 03:53 PM
1

This has nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights17/12/24 03:34 PM
12

No
/r/MensRights17/12/24 01:56 PM
11

That's not how rape works, they could very well still do that. But they probably think you have a penis, yes.
/r/MensRights17/12/24 12:37 AM
1

Your argument is solely based on the idea that this random guy you spoke to on reddit is watching his wife fuck other people due to low testosterone. But he, himself, all but states that he's a pimp.
/r/MensRights16/12/24 04:43 AM
1

Being a pimp isn't normal.
/r/MensRights15/12/24 11:13 PM
1

Because he's a pimp.
/r/MensRights15/12/24 11:12 PM
1

He impregnated her multiple times, successfully. Money is a stronger drug than most. I think you're trying to make a mountain out of a molehill. He is simply a pimp. If anything he has too much testosterone.
/r/MensRights15/12/24 10:41 PM
0

I'm not defending anything. You're making the assumption that a lack of testosterone caused that behavior, and that's bullshit.
/r/MensRights15/12/24 09:50 PM
1

That only started later, and he still made money off it.
/r/MensRights15/12/24 06:29 PM
1

That's not a cuck that I just read about, that's a pimp.
/r/MensRights15/12/24 03:58 PM
1

That's not how subs work, you can post on your own profile
/r/MensRights15/12/24 03:55 PM
1

Idk, testosterone might be the problem there, you don't really see alot of stereotypical low-testosterone guys pimping out their wives.
/r/MensRights15/12/24 03:53 PM
1

He was not the first, nor had he been the last.
/r/MensRights15/12/24 03:34 AM
1

Don't you still have to pay the taxes? Isn't it just a tax break on income?
/r/MensRights13/12/24 05:53 PM
3

In every marketplace
/r/MensRights13/12/24 07:13 AM
1

I don't think you understand what Condescending means.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 06:48 AM
1

It was paraphrasing, and it's the essence of what you told OP. If you were setting an example, it doesn't change that, and it was condescending.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 06:34 AM
3

Where did I say that proletariat/bourgeoisie isn't an actual distinction? That's the argument you have made up for no reason. This discussion has always, from my OC, about feminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/24 06:20 AM
2

Wdym they aren't the same thing? That is literally my entire point. Ayn Rand has nothing to do with this discussion, I do have respect for her and her views. That doesn't change my political views. Moderates are allowed here per the sub rules anyway. What are you trying to get at?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/24 05:54 AM
1

Do you not think that feminists see women as an extremely oppressed class of people?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/24 05:38 AM
1

The only arguments you gave are based on incorrect premises and assumptions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/24 05:30 AM
2

What's poor about the logic? It's fact that the vast majority of feminists today do exactly what I said.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/24 05:27 AM
1

Lol, I'm guilty of, "wrong think." You have become a caricature seen in conservative discussions now. Again, I never once denied class dynamics, only the feminist idea that women are some proletariat, and men are oppressors to be destroyed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/24 05:24 AM
0

You are an extremist sir, capitalism is not inherently right wing, and liberalism has always been a progressive idealogy, often left wing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/24 05:21 AM
4

No, perhaps you misunderstood. The comparison is that feminist see themselves as the proletariats, the oppressed class, and men as the bourgeoisie, the oppressors to be destroyed. That's the dynamic that exists because of false ideas and premises. But I also dislike Marxist ideas about the topic in general, marx did not live in the dystopias he spoke about, no one ever has. Even during the Russian revolution, there was no capitalism, it was an absolute monarchy, the Nobles were the bourgeoisie, …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/24 05:19 AM
-1

According to you. Apparently, classic liberalism is right-wing now. Or anyone who's not a Marxist, communist, or some other authoritarian far left idealogy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/24 05:08 AM
1

You must be a woman, guys absolutely compliment guys. Idk where that feminist myth started.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 04:53 AM
1

Siping?
/r/MensRights13/12/24 04:48 AM
20

The countries who gave women rights first were already on top when they did. It was at the height of imperialism. You've been living under a rock the last 50 years if you've never heard the term, "radical feminism." Or never met a feminist. Why are you so against men fighting for equal rights? No one's saying, "take the rights of women."
/r/MensRights13/12/24 04:23 AM
7

That is the point of the argument, men cannot just suck a dick and get a job. Our merit is worth more because, despite the delusions of feminism, men have lesser value to society, while women will have value by virtue of the sexualization feminists complain about. A man will never rise to fame and do TED talks by going down on a female president, men must make themselves valuable via our work, there is no uterus, we cannot reproduce asexually or monosexually. What you might call objectification …
/r/MensRights13/12/24 04:15 AM
2

Patriarchy is a political-social system that insists that males are inherently dominating, superior to everything and everyone deemed weak, especially females, and endowed with the right to dominate and rule over the weak and to maintain that dominance through various forms of psychological terrorism and violence. When my older brother and I were born with a year separating us in age, patriarchy determined how we would each be regarded by our parents. Both our parents believed in patriarchy; the…
/r/MensRights13/12/24 04:03 AM
1

"All," Is not a word stated in the post. And having relationships doesn't mean you're not disposable to the society. Really doesn't mean you're indispensable in individual relationships either. But generally when people talk like OP it is an existential crisis, not just a feeling of lonliness. As in the issue is deeper. Frankly, it's rude as hell to tell someone in existential crisis advice that really amounts to, "man up." Even if there are nice intentions and you weren't condescending.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 03:45 AM
1

Wow, she took a couple comments to another sub, isn't that against the rules here?
/r/MensRights13/12/24 03:28 AM
8

Monica was in the White House
/r/MensRights13/12/24 03:23 AM
0

Game of life man.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 03:21 AM
6

YOU'RE the one talking about relationships. OP just feels, "disposable, forgotten, and dismissed." It's literally the most common existential crisis in human existence. It's not necessarily about lonliness.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 03:16 AM
1

Isn't that what a dowry is for? Don't they still have those in India?
/r/MensRights13/12/24 03:11 AM
1

They have got to learn how to lobby like Americans.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 03:09 AM
1

Well, idk what game you were on, but the general rules only really involve making reasonable goals and following through.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 03:07 AM
5

Right, you said you're assuming it's about friendship and romance. Which doesn't change the nature of my argument. Someone who feels like they're disposable and that they won't be remembered. Isn't just worried about friendship and romance, both of which they may have.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 02:58 AM
-1

Avoiding it is making you miserable. You can't sit there and tell me you're, "playing the game."
/r/MensRights13/12/24 02:53 AM
7

Point stands. Someone is in crisis, and you lack the empathy needed to even see the crisis. You might be exhibiting what they call, "toxic masculinity."
/r/MensRights13/12/24 02:48 AM
8

You're assuming this is only about romance, straight romance too. -Man in existential crisis. You- "just get a gf ya single NEET!"
/r/MensRights13/12/24 02:39 AM
7

If Ayn Rand can single handedly remake philosophical objectivism with a couple novels and lectures, there is nothing stopping you from self-publishing a Treatise on your idea of men's rights.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 01:06 AM
19

Modern Feminism promotes the idea that women are, essentially, the proletariat and men the bourgeoisie. Their capitalism is patriarchy. That causes division, hate, jealousy, etc. And it's a false comparison. But I'm also in favor of a mixed economy, and lean against the Marxist idea in general, especially when put against capitalism, Marx didn't even live in a capitalist society, he lived in Prussia and England ffs.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/24 12:30 AM
1

I'm sorry all that happened to you man. Definitely hard to trust after all that.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 12:17 AM
-4

Do you understand what the bourgeoisie/proletariat dynamic is? It insist that a higher class exploits the proletariat, something modern feminism insists on. Denying all male experiences.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/24 11:45 PM
1

How did 2 come about? Also, 4, trust should be yielded in stages, we cannot go about our lives as if everyone is out to get us.
/r/MensRights12/12/24 11:35 PM
-5

So you think men have all the power and nothing but benefits at the expense of women? Because that is the bourgeoisie/proletariat dynamic that feminists believe in.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/24 10:30 PM
-11

I don't like to give people that much grace, but there's definitely an argument that the common false proletariat vs bourgeoisie narrative causes the vitriol against men and men's rights. But I'd like to think that people are more rational.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/24 10:03 PM
1

If you think less than 1% of the population wouldn't hoard that specific amount wealth in a Marxist society, then you are delusional. They'd just be the government.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/24 09:56 PM
1

Yes, far more than any other system.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/24 09:06 PM
3

Firstly, it doesn't matter, idk what kind of sexist angle you're trying to create. Secondly, yes.
/r/MensRights12/12/24 06:56 PM
0

Tbf, that is clearly a tabloid, look at everything else on the paper. Hopefully it's a tabloid.
/r/MensRights12/12/24 06:24 PM
5

I don't like him, some of his takes remind me of Sarah dawn more, and I am suspicious of anyone reminding me of her after that shit she pulled with a clip of cher. He speaks in too much platitudes.
/r/MensRights12/12/24 06:13 PM
-4

No, it's not solid at all, under capitalism, the wealthy regularly end up destitute, and the poor regularly climb the ladder. And the replacement, that is so often offered, drags everyone down to the bottom, and keeps everyone down every time.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/24 05:52 PM
1

That is a quote which Hooks agreed with. She doesn't see men as human, seeing some as good doesn't negate sexism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/24 05:48 PM
1

The comparisons to her abusive exes and father start only a few paragraphs into chapter one. And continue throughout the book.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/24 05:45 PM
1

You may find it, but the context doesn't matter, no context would make that ok. No context would make that un-sexist. If she believes men are good, it is only the same way that a golden retriever is better than a pit bull, according to people who hate Pitt bulls. The Christina Hoff Sommers question was on her feminism, not whether she's left or right. However, she is traditionally liberal, as most centrist and conservatives are. Most leftists are as well, though I don't think many would admit it…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/24 05:29 PM
1

A non sexist would not sit there and state that a human male could become human. Or that the group is defective. That they can only become, "more human," (not human) by changing some defect that she saw in her abusive father and is implanting on all the others. How, on this earth, can that be deemed, "empathetic?" A non sexist would not see discomfort in men, and say, "lack of emotions." Or, more commonly from feminists, "emotional intelligence."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/24 05:24 PM
1

Hooks? Yes, when she was writing, Karen DeCrow's feminism was still strong and alive. And some of those protestors disagreed with the little sympathy she gave men, but most thought she was a crazy sexist. That is not the case today, the common feminist is the Hook's feminist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/24 05:19 PM
1

Christina Hoff Sommers is a feminist, she's just not a Marxist who subscribes to some false bourgeoisie/proletariat power dynamics. She is an equalist. In the beginning of The Will to Change, Hooks equates all men with her exes, and abusive father. She further states, male privilege prevents them from becoming whole, authentic human beings She, like Solanas, saw men as defective humans, at best. Note, she never even states that men could become human, just, "more human."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/24 05:13 PM
1

If men started calling female emotions, "hysteria," again, they would rightfully be mad. Hook's feminism is the most common feminism, and it's mainly dehumanizing misandry, she is no sympathetic feminist. Karen DeCrow actually saw men as humans, her feminism died before she did. Christina Hoff Sommers genuinely cares about the male condition, and average feminists protests everything she does. Same with Camille Paglia. Hooks is just like Dworkin, with every example of sympathy she states at leas…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/24 05:08 PM
0

Bell Hooks saw men as less-than-human. She's just as bad as Andrea Dworkin. Karen DeCrow, Camile Paglia, and Christina Hoff Sommers are good feminists, feminists who see men as human, and deserving of rights and fair treatment; feminists who don't think men are abusers, or that the majority are. Hooks is the average feminist, and that's why it's impossible to work with them. They don't see men as human, we're barely dogs to them, quite a few believe we're to be trained.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/24 04:32 PM
3

https://youtu.be/dt7twXzNEsQ?si=VUIakatoLr8dMRfb It's pretty damn close, if not there.
/r/MensRights12/12/24 04:27 PM
1

Firstly, in the opening of -The Will to Change- Hooks shows herself to be a radical feminist, so hurt by the males in her life that she can't see the differences, and she believes that her story speaks for the majority of women against men. She says patriarchy is evil, and men are patriarchy. She states that men are subhuman, she's just a soft spoken Valerie Solanas. "male privilege prevents them from becoming whole, authentic human beings" -The Will to Change Unlike Solanas, at least she though…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/24 04:22 PM
2

It's unavailable even as a treatment for premature births, and high risk pregnancy, and ectopic pregnancy. Because human testing is illegal, even for that reason.
/r/MensRights12/12/24 03:38 PM
1

Patriarchy does not exist, and Hooks is one of the biggest misandrists among the black feminists. She blames Patriarchy, whilst infantilizing men, and taking advantage of her own family. She's no better than any other feminist. The issues of emotions is not male, it is not caused by Patriarchy, it is largely non-existant, and mostly cultural where it is. If someone told you to go the restrooms to calm down while emotional, then it was likely at work, not the time or place to be emotional, and wo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/24 03:27 PM
14

Right, as if these are mutually exclusive.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/24 03:22 PM
6

Did he identify as an MRA? Most evangelical conservatives would not identify as an MRA, and are not MRAs. I don't believe strong language such as, "near total abolition...etc," should be used, most people do want the traditional gender rolls, and each individual and/or couple should decide for themselves. The, "women are wonderful," issues are the reason most feminists hate the MRM, because one focus is pointing out how women victimize men, and that it's extremely common. Intersectionality is st…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/24 03:15 PM
-8

Call it what it is, Marxism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/24 03:13 PM
1

It is available, human testing is just illegal.
/r/MensRights12/12/24 02:59 PM
4

It's not socially acceptable to discuss one's dating life at work, highly unprofessional, and often against policy.
/r/MensRights12/12/24 02:28 PM
7

Id do it.
/r/MensRights12/12/24 02:25 PM
8

Does women stating, "we don't need no man," not indicate that they want men gone? And that statement is very popular, from real life to movies.
/r/MensRights12/12/24 02:24 PM
3

It is banned, the invention already exists. Ethics around these sciences all over the world have long caused the ban on human testing, and demand the euthanasization of any animals used in it.
/r/MensRights12/12/24 02:18 PM
11

Is it wrong?
/r/MensRights12/12/24 02:16 PM
3

Why does this article assume there is not already a working artificial womb? It has been successfully tested in sheep already. We don't need women at all, all we need is an embryo, and we've successfully created artificial embryos in mice. https://youtu.be/DWOmrIpDBNI?si=fnLvPKTXSeMNO62o The technology has been here for a long time, it's the ethic commitees who've banned human testing on this stuff, and demand that the animals used be euthanized.
/r/MensRights12/12/24 02:15 PM
1

It would take alot of force to do that, you're not going to twist them by free ballin.
/r/MensRights12/12/24 12:03 AM
3

Saving that for future arguments.
/r/MensRights11/12/24 11:50 PM
1

Very breezy, but mostly too small, they are not flattering. However, there are still some men's fashion that is similar enough. One can generally get away with wearing a kilt in public in the west. There are also eastern styles, such as this men's kaftan, https://www.amazon.com/Yaohuole-V-Neck-Sleeve-Kaftan-Casual/dp/B091DQW19Z/ref=asc_df_B091DQW19Z?mcid=e99a505b6ced30fca8611650820f1901&hvocijid=4908014485542621415-B091DQW19Z-&hvexpln=73&tag=hyprod-20&linkCode=df0&hvadid=692875362841&hvpos=&hvne…
/r/MensRights11/12/24 11:47 PM
5

https://youtube.com/watch?v=hj719mKBIB8&si=lC2ZnSvQRIPPR1aY https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLGFFi6pRCnCdQTe1iG3Tw4Td9jvhY2w74&si=gU9f45XdE3S3NZJS https://youtu.be/ZKe8BxvjZIs?si=ctJtCSY20CSWQ3Bh https://youtu.be/mn1SK1opX1M?si=hlaWNVffA6Q5ZvlI https://youtu.be/r8Icwgux5c0?si=qQhbbGAnwvA4-CPW
/r/MensRights11/12/24 11:02 PM
8

It doesn't exist, it's a sexist buzzword to push feminist's hatred of men.
/r/MensRights08/12/24 10:53 PM
17

"It's all the inexplicable evil of, 'pAtRiArChY!"
/r/MensRights08/12/24 08:28 PM
0

There was no advice, there were only questions.
/r/MensRights06/12/24 03:49 AM
-3

One could assume that I asked the questions I asked because I'm aware they're not in the US.
/r/MensRights06/12/24 03:18 AM
3

Would it not be obvious?
/r/MensRights06/12/24 01:59 AM
-15

A, "no," would have been sufficient to tell me that you cannot obtain acetaminophen over the counter.
/r/MensRights06/12/24 01:47 AM
11

OTC means it would be on the shelf outside the pharmacy. Over the counter.
/r/MensRights06/12/24 12:48 AM
18

Do they not sell children's Tylenol OTC?
/r/MensRights06/12/24 12:44 AM
5

Whilst women like Riley Reid, and Amy Schumer get thunderous applause for admissions of rape and SA.
/r/MensRights05/12/24 09:04 PM
8

Lighter sentencing for female criminals. It's better to say, "overly hostile sentences for male criminals, compared to female criminals."
/r/MensRights05/12/24 09:00 PM
2

Write the books.
/r/MensRights05/12/24 08:53 PM
6

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discrimination_against_men#:~:text=Discrimination%20against%20men%20based%20on,than%20women%20for%20similar%20crimes.
/r/MensRights05/12/24 08:45 PM
2

I am neither a woman, nor a Karen. Patriarchy is not a new term, it's been stated on national television and newspapers. It saw heavier use in the 90s and 2010s than this decade, so far.
/r/MensRights05/12/24 08:34 PM
12

I understand you're young, you're probably just learning about feminism. But most modern feminists are misandrists, at best they see men as children who constantly hurt ourselves. They often refuse to acknowledge, and often scoff at, the idea of systemic discrimination against men, especially white men, but even with non-white men they refuse to say that it's discrimination based on gender. At worst they see men only as an evil bourgeoisie class hell bent on killing them, which is absolutely lud…
/r/MensRights05/12/24 08:07 PM
8

Were you Amish? Have you been living under a rock? Doing a long term technology cleanse?
/r/MensRights05/12/24 07:55 PM
13

1) men can't cry or show emotion. This is blatantly from the patriarchy, since it wants men to be "strong" by not showing emotion 2) I can't think ok anything else atm but i do know there defo is more, so do y'all get my point That is not a problem with men, most can cry, and it's certainly not some world spanning evil patriarchy preventing it. It is a very hostile word that demonizes men by its usage and etymology, nor does it properly describe the actual hierarchy we live in. When confronted w…
/r/MensRights05/12/24 07:44 PM
1

We don't know exactly when the crime happened, we're just assuming. The only times we know for sure are the store times, and that they police were called at 340.
/r/MensRights05/12/24 07:24 PM
5

They've been like that for a while. Started in colleges.
/r/MensRights05/12/24 07:21 PM
1

It's 8km from the store to the other side of mqabba, less to the closest point. Additionally, while details on a vehicle are sparse, there was still the possibility of a car, the defense is just insisting that the guy didn't drive. There is no evidence all she has is a random WhatsApp account that is supposedly linked to her that sent messages that can be easily faked. Not according to the only source we're using.
/r/MensRights05/12/24 07:11 PM
0

The parents already knew about the cocaine, they reported to the school. On several occasions the minor would threaten her victim at knifepoint, pressing a penknife against her stomach. All this allegedly happened at school. The victim would take money from her father who, subsequently told police that he reckoned the total amount to be €800. The victim said that she would hand over the money to the 13-year-old bully outside her Mqabba home. Sometimes Dalli Balzan was present and the 13-year-old…
/r/MensRights05/12/24 07:02 PM
1

I'm still leaning against him and the gf. The gf stated she was in the same town as him, but didn't know where exactly. Seems to me that it's more than possible for these places to all be close enough for the crime to happen, even with that alibi. Sounds more like old gf is pissed at new gf either way he a pedo The 13yo was the 15yo's drug dealer. The alleged victim had told him how she got to know the 13-year-old at school some months previously. The younger girl once offered her cocaine. That …
/r/MensRights05/12/24 06:45 PM
1

Although she said she identified Dalli Balzan through his voice and tattoo, she could not describe the tattoo. Recognizing a tatoo, in such cases, doesn't necessarily mean that she'll be able to describe the exact tatoo. It could simply be that there was a tatoo on his arm. Voice recognition is more important, the lack of a tatoo description, as a defense, is a desperate attempt to clear a case, imo.
/r/MensRights05/12/24 06:28 PM
2

She had a gun to her head and multiple criminals about her. It's kinda hard to see details in amid an assault. Maybe I know too much about American organized crime, but I'd bet money that there is no footage, or adequate footage, and there will be some loose relations to the store owner and the gang. They were extorting the victim over a bit of cocaine, according to the story.
/r/MensRights05/12/24 06:18 PM
1

She had a gun to her head and multiple criminals about her. It's kinda hard to see details in amid an assault.
/r/MensRights05/12/24 06:12 PM
1

If the courts don't have enough power to check and balance that legislation, then I'd consider it a problem of the justice system as well.
/r/MensRights05/12/24 05:23 PM
1

I think Malta is a nice little country, I'm just not familiar with the court systems. Our courts are much better than the ones in the USA Weren't you sent to jail for having sex with a fellow minor of only a 2-year age difference?
/r/MensRights05/12/24 05:15 PM
3

In that case his innocence will likely depend on whether or not that store had a camera. If courts there are typical of western courts. But I'm leaning against the validity of his alibi anyway, and he's guilty of at least one crime in any case, if not the gang related crimes.
/r/MensRights05/12/24 04:58 PM
8

That depends on where you're starting, no? But, frankly, it's more likely he's lying. Like, the gang was extorting the victim for a while before hand. The likelihood that the victim is lying is very small. The victim was 15, the gf is said to be 13. Did you not even read your source?
/r/MensRights05/12/24 04:35 PM
11

Someone who's not familiar with important details, like the size of Malta, and distances between Fgura and Mqabba may be prone to believe the alibi. But it's not a foolproof alibi, far from it. A 21yo and a 13yo is not even close to the same situation as two minors with a 2 year age difference. He's a pedophile.
/r/MensRights05/12/24 04:30 PM
7

These towns are less than 20 minutes away from each other, that is the alibi he chose, but it's not a foolproof alibi. More likely he's lying, common tactic,.especially with gang members to back him up. Malta is a very small island.
/r/MensRights05/12/24 04:24 PM
11

He was part of a crime, multiple crimes. He was there, part of the larger crime, there were like 5 criminals. How old are you? Do you think you can join your gang buddies in a crime, and get off because you just watched or goaded it on? That is not how that works. And he's a pedophile ffs.
/r/MensRights05/12/24 04:17 PM
17

It was in Malta, that tiny crusader island in the Mediterranean.
/r/MensRights05/12/24 03:52 PM
134

The dude's a 21yo gang member with a 13yo gf, both involved in an attempted murder of a minor. This is not a men's rights issue, that dude is where he belongs. Definitely not discrimination. We are not here to defend gang activities.
/r/MensRights05/12/24 03:41 PM
26

The gays are, "safe," but they're still men. So they'll compare them to chihuahuas instead of retrievers and Pitt bulls.
/r/MensRights05/12/24 02:40 PM
14

They don't get a pass from their own races, those black feminists are worse than most modern white ones, way more extreme, sometimes in really wierd directions, and Korean feminists literally created the 4b movement.
/r/MensRights05/12/24 08:54 AM
9

I don't think it's a father issue, they tend to be harder on boys, according to recent studies. Hence the common, "mother's boy," and, "daddy's girl," phrases.
/r/MensRights04/12/24 01:55 PM
2

Too bad her style of feminism died before she did.
/r/MensRights04/12/24 12:57 AM
1

That's actually illegal whether or not there is a pregnancy.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 10:46 PM
7

Feminist Karen DeCrow supported options for financial abortion. One aspect of equality between women and men is economics. Anatomy has determined that only women have the right to choose natural parenthood. The courts have properly determined that a man should neither be able to force a woman to have an abortion nor to prevent her from having one, should she so choose. Justice therefore dictates that if a woman makes a unilateral decision to bring pregnancy to term, and the biological father doe…
/r/MensRights03/12/24 10:43 PM
3

The likelihood of reversing a Vasectomy without fertility issues is pretty low.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 10:38 PM
1

Most male BC has caused long term fertility issues, and the ones OP mention are still in research phases.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 10:33 PM
3

Yes, historically it effected men more severely, and many trials have ended halfway through. Condoms and abstinence have always been the best options. Though, for female BC, the drugs themselves can relieve other issues often regarding pain, this is not the case for male BC.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 10:27 PM
3

They are, in fact, lambskin.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 09:19 PM
3

No, it's just the name for the system. It's not institutionalized. There need not be a law preventing other parties, in most 2 party systems there are more than 2 parties, there are just 2 major parties who effectively win everything. In political science there is this thing called Duverger's Law that explains why a system like the US remains 2 party, even though there are more than 2.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 06:34 PM
2

CHS described some of those things in her books that are straight out of the fascist handbook, she compared some groups to the red guard and brown coats.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 05:50 PM
3

60-40 women to men is beyond, "inclusion."
/r/MensRights03/12/24 05:47 PM
61

That was one person empathizing, the staff couldn't do anything because of policy to prevent litigation. Honestly, parents obviously nowhere, she was probably a distraction for them to steal things.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 05:32 PM
103

There's quite a few Korean users here. We should be concerned about them outside the feminist issues as well. Martial law tends to come with severe free speech restrictions and conscription. We will likely see Alien and Sedition Acts soon, and possibly impressment.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 05:26 PM
2

Because other parties are allowed to attempt, we're not the USSR or Communist China. It is possible for a third party to win, just highly unlikely. Jo Jorgenson may have won the popular vote if she were allowed to debate, but the Libertarian party didn't meet the requirements, they needed more politicians running for House seats. She was on the ballot in every state, fairly popular among people who knew who she was, and pretty centrist. The Libertarians literally didn't have enough politicians t…
/r/MensRights03/12/24 04:58 PM
2

It is a two party system, multi-party systems require a different way of voting, or more equal party membership. For example, were party membership split 3 ways we may have 3 parties. But that's not guaranteed as the electoral votes must also have a certain number, meaning a third party can't just have the membership, they also need the politicians. And everytime a party has come close to meeting the expectations, Libertarians the last 2 times, the Republicans and democrats increase the requirem…
/r/MensRights03/12/24 04:19 PM
3

The feminists among Republicans actually recognize issues of men's rights, js. CHS has actually fought for the MRM as a feminist, for example. The democrats rely on their pro-labour reputation, but they even abandoned that in the times it counted most. The events of the Trucker Strike are the prime example, where Biden pressured the Canadian government to do something about them, and Trudeau's government decided to freeze the financial assets of the protestors. Democrats are just authoritarians …
/r/MensRights03/12/24 04:15 PM
2

It's called a lobby.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 04:08 PM
5

Well, for example, if you want contraline's ADAM, it's in a trial phase. So we really don't know much except what they've theorized and tested. And you have to be in Australia to even have the option, as it's being researched in Australia, and you have to sign up and be approved for any further trials. It's not currently accessible. So no, it's actually not an option unless you happen to be part of the current trial. Nor is it the best option, abstinence and condoms will always be the best optio…
/r/MensRights03/12/24 04:00 PM
7

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7513428/#:~:text=The%20most%20commonly%20reported%20side,changes%2C%20and%20changes%20in%20libido. All the BC you mention aren't still in their trial phases. Additionally, condoms only have a high failure rate because of human error. Follow IFU's.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 03:41 PM
2

Male birth control has worse problems atm than female bc. Not only does it cause weight gain, lower sex drive, and cause aches and pains. It can also be so severe as to cause or increase suicidal thought, moreso than other medications on the market. Abstinence is, and always has been the only assured bc. Condoms a close second. If you're going so far as to go bare, you're better off going with the cheaper option of lambskin condoms. https://www.trojanbrands.com/en/products/condoms/trojan-natural…
/r/MensRights03/12/24 03:24 PM
1

But your answer is bad. The world is already misandristic, to be misogynistic only confirms the world's beliefs.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 02:47 PM
0

https://youtu.be/7nmr-64XyTw?si=wWeoL_j7bHnWIA5K
/r/MensRights03/12/24 02:30 PM
8

It certainly is not very few irl, you'll see it daily in female dominated spaces, I work in multiple.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 02:22 PM
1

Now you know they're not going to do that. You could have given a realistic answer.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 02:19 PM
0

Conscription was never part of male voting rights until the 1970s in the US. People need to stop with that false narrative, misinformation doesn't help.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 02:14 PM
33

Up to 20 years in prison A fine of up to $10,000 Ineligibility for government employment for five years after conviction Reparations Civil lawsuit
/r/MensRights02/12/24 10:26 PM
2

They were also insulting and condescending about it.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 08:06 PM
8

Wait until you see what he thinks of men's rights. Worse than Ayn Rand, at least she saw all civil rights movements as equally evil. Rogan is a feminist, he thinks men have all rights under the sun, and that all male problems are the fault of the victim.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/24 07:56 PM
0

Conscription has been around forever.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 07:46 PM
1

But my point is merely that you rarely need to punch back to stop a woman from hitting you. Again, that is not nearly as rare as you think. Women are violent. My boyfriend had me completely restrained with one arm behind his back. I’m small, but it makes it very likely to me that most men could pull this off with two hands. Your bf is 1 in billions, and prevention doesn't help men already in these situation. You need to women to stop abusing men.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 07:39 PM
1

It's not nearly as rare as you think it is. Wanting to punch back is not the issue. You're making the case for the idea that men must take assault and abuse, relying on the idea that men are strong and women are weak. It doesn't matter who's stronger, you're blaming victims of violence, instead of telling women to stop picking fights with men.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 07:29 PM
1

Yes, many have, Karen DeCrow, for example.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 07:12 PM
1

Many people recognize the necessity of the armed forces, and a country's need to make sure they have everything. Suicide is never needed in a society.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 07:12 PM
1

Well thank the law that it isn't up to you. Your ideas would make it effectively legal to abuse men.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 07:07 PM
1

Have you ever fought another woman?
/r/MensRights02/12/24 06:15 PM
1

Often no? You can just push her away, restrain her or exit the situation. if it's an option, yes, but rough housing is not fighting. It's consensual.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 06:13 PM
1

Yes, often yes, unless there's another woman who'll do it for you, or a group of people who saw everything to hold her back.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 06:08 PM
1

Self defense can require a punch, no one is out there breaking jaws and noses on purpose. It is an injury risked when you attack someone.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 05:34 PM
1

She's clearly a bigot though, I'm not taking it back.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 03:59 PM
1

She is being generic enough for me, imo, to say it.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 03:48 PM
2

Are you simply assuming that larger people wouldn't feel in danger by smaller ones? Or that proportional force doesn't include enough force to end the assault? You've stated a push would be enough for you, but you've obviously never been in the situation. Most people get up even when they're pushed down, often angrier than before. Yes, should the assailant stop after being pushed down, that would be enough force. But it is perfectly proportional to stop an assailant by actions that would break t…
/r/MensRights02/12/24 03:39 PM
3

Comparing women to dwarfs alone is both racist and misogynistic. But it further goes into how weak they are, etc. It's the very definition of racism and misogyny. She wants to be a victim so badly that she insist men are more powerful, by shitting on little people.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 03:33 PM
1

That is how evidence works, not what the law says.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 03:31 PM
3

Since you're running from the original conversation. I don’t deserve them? I am not attacking my boyfriend. I’m not appropriating dwarfs. I’m saying a dwarf attacking me would not lead to me fighting back full force. I have however playfought him. He wins one hand behind his back. Then I can’t move and it’s just game over. What does that tell you? Well, that if I tried to hit him, it would be a cakewalk for him to stop me. As long as I wasn’t armed. Also: if I hit him, he’s got a teeny bruise at…
/r/MensRights02/12/24 03:17 PM
3

So now you're appropriating, "dwarfs?" You're not the definition of a dwarf, you chose to be with someone significantly taller than you. You certainly don't deserve them, considering you think it's appropriate for smaller people to assault larger people. You got some complex there.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 02:59 PM
4

Damn right it's weird, and I've never known a teacher who hasn't done it at least once within 5 years of their career.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 02:56 PM
4

If that's true, and I doubt it is, then your teacher is odd, most teachers sit people together to set them up, because the teacher is bored. You're acting like it's some historical precedent.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 02:53 PM
5

You don't have any idea how racist and misogynistic your comment is, do you?
/r/MensRights02/12/24 02:50 PM
13

Then not putting quiet girls next to disruptive boys. Teachers have often done this in the past, using the girls as a sort of pacifier. Do you think it’s bad they don’t do that anymore? That's not why that happens, you're up in your head with that.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 02:36 PM
18

Yes, it exists, as feminists use it, to create animosity towards men.
/r/MensRights29/11/24 04:22 PM
5

It's called victim blaming. You never see, not anymore at least, that abused alcoholic mothers are escaping from their drug dealer whom they entered a relationship with.
/r/MensRights28/11/24 09:55 PM
16

Well that's all dating sites/apps.
/r/MensRights28/11/24 06:54 PM
8

Ashley Madison
/r/MensRights28/11/24 05:55 PM
8

You'd have to lawyer up and get it court ordered in France. Even if you're not caught sending out a private dna test kit, it's not admissible in French courts.
/r/MensRights28/11/24 05:53 PM
9

You don't think parents and children have a right to know whether they're biological relatives?
/r/MensRights28/11/24 05:51 PM
11

France also doesn't want wives to find out about any other children. It's all DNA testing, 23&Me and Ancestry is illegal too.
/r/MensRights28/11/24 05:34 PM
20

What are you getting at? France had more bastard kings than England.
/r/MensRights28/11/24 05:03 PM
11

It's to prevent the breakup of families and panic from learning family medical history. Completely unethical imo, but I'm American. https://support.ancestry.com/s/article/Countries-Where-AncestryDNA-is-Available?language=en_US
/r/MensRights28/11/24 05:01 PM
1

It's already called MGTOW buddy.
/r/MensRights27/11/24 04:39 PM
8

It's not true though. The strongest figures of history came up in times of relative peace. And were mostly wealthy nobles.
/r/MensRights26/11/24 06:35 PM
2

And then you have to mute them a thousand times, they may as well be harassing users.
/r/MensRights26/11/24 03:39 PM
2

I'm just saying, The similarities between Biden and Kamala during this election are suspiciously similar to that of Hindenburg and Hitler. -old and sickly president -younger VP who is further towards the extreme political side than the old president -a seemingly hostile takeover wherein the older president was ousted I honestly wouldn't have been surprised if the government and Biden gave Kamala emergency powers.
/r/MensRights26/11/24 04:40 AM
5

Well, at least it’s not as bad as men writing women It's a 100+ yo man stalking a child, AND don't get me started jacob×renesmee. Or the whole jacob×edward×bella bs. https://youtube.com/shorts/y2OonxbwwfQ?si=eMHa2qec9wOVPDVI
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/24 11:59 PM
3

We like our fantasy with a side of romance, not a romance with a side of fantasy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/24 11:56 PM
2

TikTok bro. Marketing is key, Self-publishing is the future.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/24 11:55 PM
6

Feminists, historically, have thrown gasoline onto the fire that is men's rights and issues, and been the direct cause of others.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/24 10:44 PM
13

Ps. No room for rape culture, violence and disrespect of women. Eg, "if she cheats on me, she deserves a belt treatment" or "she wear clothes like a slut, what did she expect from me, protection?" That feminist misinformation is a major reason why so many here are anti-feminist. Such things have not been said among MRA's, wherever you heard that was propaganda at best. Christina Hoff Sommers said that feminists, under women's lobby groups, conducted propaganda campaigns, and questionable researc…
/r/MensRights25/11/24 10:24 PM
3

Be sending the women to the parlor for cakes, while smoking and drinking in the smoking room.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 10:20 PM
5

That's not what this post is talking about. Girl can't even be around her dad when his friends are there, this is some Gilded Age stuff.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 10:04 PM
1

He was denied to entry into art school before WW1, and still worked as a professional artist for a postcard company. It's a satirical narrative that being denied to art school caused his antisemitism, Mein Kampf was written after WW1. Their stories are completely different. In fact, what happened with the democrats this election was closer to what happened in Germany when Hitler took power, nothing republicans have done has come close. WW era German generals, to this date, are considered superio…
/r/MensRights25/11/24 06:05 PM
35

Traditionally, yes. However, the extent you're talking about sounds like a middle eastern, or southern American cultural difference, specifically.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 05:50 PM
0

I think he's going to be seen as more of an Oliver Cromwell character by future historians.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 05:47 PM
5

Cause it's satire
/r/MensRights25/11/24 05:45 PM
15

Feminazi is not equal to incel. Incel means involuntarily celibate, it's a slur to replace, "virgin." Feminazis are called that satirically because groups of feminists, usually on college campuses, would engage in authoritarian, fascist, nazi-esque actions in order to censor people they didn't like. At times it caused violence.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 05:43 PM
5

Follow workplace policies.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 04:06 PM
9

Was tampering with another's drink not a crime before?
/r/MensRights25/11/24 01:44 PM
5

If anything can make you angry enough to break expensive personal items, then you do indeed have anger issues. You should initiate divorce and go to therapy for anger issues.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 12:49 AM
4

Most of the people referenced to as, "incels," don't call themselves incels. Why are you looking here? Why not r/relationships?
/r/MensRights25/11/24 12:43 AM
4

As desperate and lonely. Incel, by its etymology and definition, could be someone who is paralyzed, or had another disability preventing them from entering sexual relationships. as a slur, it's the new, "virgin."
/r/MensRights25/11/24 12:40 AM
1

AAEV is not a dialect the majority know, please speak, "like a whitey," as you might put it in jive.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 12:24 AM
31

What first steps? The article didn't explain anything. Is this program only for male victims of male on male abuse? Because that's what it infers.
/r/MensRights24/11/24 09:12 PM
-1

That's not what 4b is, angry feminazis have been shaving their heads for decades.
/r/MensRights24/11/24 06:47 PM
6

That is sexual assault, yes.
/r/MensRights24/11/24 04:09 PM
2

That’s exactly the same thing they say to men. Why do that?? Is it not working?
/r/MensRights24/11/24 03:56 PM
9

No, they just call for the genocide of over half the human race, by straight up death, exile, and/or ending males as a concept. From Valerie Solanas, https://www.khoury.northeastern.edu/home/shivers/rants/scum.html To Andrea Dworkin, Katherine Mackinnon, Gloria Steinem, etc.
/r/MensRights24/11/24 03:49 PM
1

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLGFFi6pRCnCdQTe1iG3Tw4Td9jvhY2w74&si=M4s6JMARFQjwF3Zf https://youtu.be/hj719mKBIB8?si=6hYeuMlcgpUJ5p-l
/r/MensRights24/11/24 03:44 PM
2

What's wrong with that person's argument?
/r/MensRights24/11/24 03:36 PM
2

The pill people come out at around 6pm EST. And the modern MRM was created specifically because feminism blames men for everything, and denies any arguments for men that aren't, "men hurt because of men." Feminism directly attacked men, they caused the boy's education crisis, they refused to allow male voices in the college rape crisis and MeToo, they support false accusations against men, and when a feminist does support men as an MRA, the popular feminists denounce them as traitors and misogyn…
/r/MensRights24/11/24 03:28 PM
4

Idc, they're the same women who'd rather have their stomachs eaten out by bears, than be in the presence of a man anyway. Remember everyone, sharks are safer than women in every possible way.
/r/MensRights24/11/24 03:16 PM
3

No one knew who he was. He still has less followers than Lauren Southern after she moved to Australia, he was completely inconsequential, the feminists are giving him popularity because, as i said, they latch onto anything and everything, no matter how unpopular, that promotes their world view.
/r/MensRights24/11/24 12:41 AM
30

That is debatable. And if that were true, so what? We really gonna sit here and act like the MRM is majority anti-sex-work?
/r/MensRights23/11/24 01:09 PM
102

It shows that hateful women will latch on to anything, no matter how small or prevalent, and use it to hate men and make everything about them. No one knew who that was or what he said before TikTok man haters decided to take it and say, "see, this is what men want." It's literally feminist propaganda.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 12:48 PM
1

Well what he say? Wtf should I care?
/r/MensRights23/11/24 12:37 PM
1

No idea what any of that means.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 12:36 PM
19

Not necessarily, I know many men, myself included, interested in the behavior patterns of fauna. Like, I don't know about swimming with orcas, and id be that one dude who gets eaten by the filter feeding sharks. But orcas do be having near human levels of society and sound communication, and that is fascinating.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 06:03 AM
26

They still haven't put oral in the definition? But also, in order to be proper and clear, the fbi must explicitly state that MTP is rape. Like, handfuls of people still argue today if oral rape is rape, and not regular SA; though not as commonly as in the 80s and 90s, but clear definitions in courts and law enforcement are needed. And, yes, at least one definition is still gendered. https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/violent-crime/rape https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-t…
/r/MensRights23/11/24 05:23 AM
1

Why is the pay gap question coming up again? https://youtu.be/QcDrE5YvqTs?si=GN8ugSt8w6a72bNb https://youtu.be/58arQIr882w?si=YtHi0cfLYkdxtzeH https://youtu.be/9xgOS43xC4Q?si=Z5JUTt1QHGPdPZDH
/r/MensRights22/11/24 06:34 PM
7

An AMA isn't necessarily an olive branch.
/r/MensRights22/11/24 02:04 PM
3

What kind of feminist?
/r/MensRights22/11/24 02:02 PM
1

https://youtu.be/58arQIr882w?si=YtHi0cfLYkdxtzeH https://youtu.be/QcDrE5YvqTs?si=GN8ugSt8w6a72bNb
/r/MensRights22/11/24 01:04 PM
-1

That's what dating is for
/r/MensRights21/11/24 11:36 PM
2

What does this have to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights21/11/24 04:53 PM
-9

Because a 50/50 chance is still good odds, and the MGTOWS are stupid for insisting it's not, it statistically is.
/r/MensRights21/11/24 02:35 PM
2

Yes, extremely.
/r/MensRights21/11/24 04:16 AM
1

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLGFFi6pRCnCdQTe1iG3Tw4Td9jvhY2w74&si=EpRFHRlKOQPgZdcQ
/r/MensRights21/11/24 03:38 AM
1

They're just like any other crime bruh. That's the problem with feminism, women only lead as victims of rape, and even that's contested, with more and more men coming out daily.
/r/MensRights21/11/24 03:35 AM
2

education levels are horrendous Not compared to men and boys.
/r/MensRights21/11/24 03:28 AM
2

You're post is on your page, there's a red trash can by it, indicating that mods on feminism have rejected it, or left it in the que. But I'd bet money they'll reject it, even it you can prove you're an official graduate researcher.
/r/MensRights21/11/24 03:27 AM
2

That's how open discussions work when your statements are unpopular.
/r/MensRights21/11/24 03:25 AM
2

(I asked the opposite in the feminism subreddit bc I want to see what feminists think of men’s activists) Wanna know the difference? Men's rights isn't authoritarian. We don't censor people. While feminism isn't going to let your post see the light of day.
/r/MensRights21/11/24 03:24 AM
2

I'd avoid the topic of circumcision overrall, trust me, even mentioning the thousands and thousands of continuous studies supporting medical reasons will garner hostility, MRA's are mostly for autonomy there, not parental choice.
/r/MensRights21/11/24 03:21 AM
1

Feminism, by definition and etymology, is explicit to women. Oxford Languages: the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes. Webster: belief in and advocacy of the political, economic, and social equality of the sexes expressed especially through organized activity on behalf of women's rights and interests Cambridge: the belief that women should be allowed the same rights, power, and opportunities as men and be treated in the same way, or the set of activities intende…
/r/MensRights21/11/24 03:16 AM
7

It's all health, not just mental health.
/r/MensRights21/11/24 03:07 AM
1

The bill's name matters, it shows a clear bias.
/r/MensRights21/11/24 02:34 AM
1

A man dressed as Dorothy doesn't have DDs and surgically altered bones, and a surgically altered voice, etc. Would you expect women to be comfortable with Chaz Bono in their restrooms?
/r/MensRights21/11/24 01:45 AM
1

Went on a tangent about turtles for a bit huh?
/r/MensRights21/11/24 01:41 AM
1

So i should be comfortable just because some people are? Just send her to the women's, they won't know the difference.
/r/MensRights21/11/24 01:26 AM
4

Tf they gonna do? I'm not looking hard enough to see if Chastity "Chaz" Bono is there, and I'm not comfortable with Blaire White in the men's toilet, send her to the Women's.
/r/MensRights21/11/24 01:15 AM
2

That is also asking for too much, and it's over board. It wouldn't take all that, Feminists use fascist tactics, they'd know how to circumvent it anyway.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 07:50 PM
1

According to the state we're talking about, it's obviously not a welfare issue. You live in California, can't be surprised when your kids act Californian.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 07:32 PM
1

Technically hormones cause the infertility, but it's still a far cry from an orichectomy or gelding, etc. Frankly the mother should be put in prison for child sex abuse in a rational society Maybe, but I support a state's right to govern itself. As I said, should OP's child decide to detransition, assuming it's a trans issue (which i believe I've heard OP before, and it probably is), OP has abandoned them, when he could be a source of aid in such a situation.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 06:01 PM
-2

Feminism doesn't even need to die. If they weren't taken over by man hating socialists that are the intersectional Feminists. If they didn't collectively see misandry and systemic misandry as the oppressors being put in our place, we could work with them. That's why menslib is the way they are. They're only for men's rights from the feminist Marxist perspective, one that denies any systemic issues against men that doesn't involve blaming victims, one that believes women cannot be abusers and rap…
/r/MensRights20/11/24 05:40 PM
1

Well, he'll have to suck it up and go to the supervised visits until he can get a non biased supervisor. Though the supervisor he gets may already be non biased,he's just refusing to go. He should be able to set up video calls.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 04:48 PM
-4

Well you can easily Google these questions, which involve very controversial issues.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 03:58 PM
-2

I don't care about girls. But it isn't the same as a tubal ligation, hysterectomy, etc, no. Frankly, to equate hormone blockers to castration by gelding, which is exactly what you did, is completely absurd. I haven't even said if I support it or not. But the father cannot say he's doing this for his kid when he's given clear avenues to see them, and refuses to do so because he doesn't want to be censored around his child. Multiple people here have said that they'd rather abandon their kids than …
/r/MensRights20/11/24 03:45 PM
-6

For a biological boy? Yes, most likely.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 02:32 PM
-3

Because you know it's being used for hormone blocking, not to cut one's balls off, which is what castration is.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 02:04 PM
1

Tldr They usually are, just the definition of, "shelter," doesn't necessarily include 1br and 1br. And what does this have to do with men's rights? It wouldn't just benefit men.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 03:53 AM
19

He needs to get a lawyer and get mandated, state supervised video calls without the mother present.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 12:13 AM
32

It might be referencing transsexual related issues. Not necessarily a full gelding.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 11:28 PM
41

Why is he refusing supervised contact?
/r/MensRights19/11/24 10:47 PM
-1

What does this have to do with men's rights? How did this get past the que, while my shark or woman question hasn't?
/r/MensRights19/11/24 10:45 PM
4

They are, laws and figures come up frequently. You came on here blaming victims of the draft, for the draft.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 04:31 PM
1

There's no list. Mr Rodgers, Gordon Ramsay, and Steve Irwin aren't on the list so 🤷
/r/MensRights19/11/24 12:07 PM
100

They're feminists, they'll find the opposite and skew it in a way that supports the hypothesis anyway. That's what the common feminism does. Very Steinemist.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 11:34 AM
12

Selective Service gives men the upper hand? The Tender Years Doctrine only lost favor recently, like the 90s. Most judges spent their entire career with it, and the rule of maternal preference isn't going away very fast. We live in a gyno-centric society that has caused a lack of funding for nearly all male services such as shelters and healthcare. Despite being the group who needs shelters the most. We're punished more often and harsher in criminal courts. Like, there's literally no laws in fav…
/r/MensRights19/11/24 02:27 AM
16

I mean... Indian feminism isn't exactly inclusive and non-violent. Like, lobbies for women there generally support the idea that men cannot be raped, or sexually assaulted, especially by women.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 02:00 AM
9

False. Power has, historically, willingly been shared or given, the violent ones in a movement are always setbacks, never helpful.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 01:45 AM
11

And feminism's first wave is famously known for The Suffragettes, ie. the women who fought for the right to vote, that men had and they did not. They were treated as lesser indivuals with lesser rights and responsibilities. No, they hated one dude who was holding out for a more comprehensive civil rights law, and they hated him to a point of terrorism. They were literally willing to flood a whole town because they hated him. They tried multiple times to assassinate him, and he was all in favor o…
/r/MensRights19/11/24 01:40 AM
17

It helps to show how the people who should be helping men have abandoned them. You've said that you don't see why men's rights cannot work with feminism, and I've given you examples elsewhere. We could work with feminism, but feminism violently denounces any criticism. They violently denounce the idea that men can be victimized, especially by them, and that men should have priorities beyond women. Most feminists today are Steinemists or Dworkinists. DeCrow's leftist egalitarian feminism died lon…
/r/MensRights19/11/24 01:34 AM
1

Yes. But women cannot have acces to men's perspective and experiences. It is men's job to complete feminism with their perspective. And you are very welcome to do so. The condition is to be respectful of the work women have already achieved, and if you disagree on one of their grievances, just argue your position. When men and women tried, this happened. https://youtu.be/BY1H1rZL53I?si=W53MqqpKfHxS7Rk5 And this, https://youtu.be/9Yg-f7fC0Uw?si=LWHnmVynQnfS7sl6 And this, https://youtu.be/hx5x0Ztf…
/r/MensRights19/11/24 01:17 AM
1

That's also June.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/24 12:39 AM
2

When feminism can accept the criticism that feminist Christina Hoff Sommers gave it, then we can talk revendication. When feminism acknowledges male experiences outside of a women centered narrative, then we can talk revendication. People are here specifically because menslib is just feminist man-blaming with extra steps. They're literally the Phyllis Schlafly's of the MRM.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 12:37 AM
103

Men are literally dying, while female Ukrainian, "refugees," are insisting they're the most negatively effected victims. That's what women are being blamed for, appropriation.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 12:32 AM
17

Are you lost rn? What are you on about?
/r/MensRights19/11/24 12:26 AM
2

Mens health month is June International men's day is tomorrow.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/11/24 10:30 PM
33

It was like any other movement, you had your extremists and moderates, and people who only gave lip service, and counter movements, etc. No civil rights movement was as peaceful as modern people say.
/r/MensRights18/11/24 09:59 PM
2

Child support has little to do with this. Parents should have the right to know whether they are the biological parents.
/r/MensRights18/11/24 09:23 PM
16

I think she makes some good points. Though i don't like the implications that we should be empathetic to those feminists. As the free speech proponents stated in the times, "these feminists are using authoritarian tactics to immediately and systemically oppress people, whilst complaining about being oppressed." Like, these aren't victims, they're privileged college students, they should know better.
/r/MensRights18/11/24 09:14 PM
3

Yea, but that costs more money. It should be mandatory.
/r/MensRights18/11/24 08:32 PM
-1

Bro's just making excuses to live with injustices.
/r/MensRights18/11/24 07:37 PM
5

American Association of University Women (I.E. potential bias) They're heavily biased, according to Christina Hoff Sommers.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/11/24 06:53 PM
1

Europe doesn't have as much of a history of presumption of innocence as the US. However, in reality, there is actually a THIRD option; conditional dismissals (voorwaardelijk sepot) — where charges are conditionally dropped by the prosecutor without any formal guilt finding — are treated as though they imply guilt. That is pretty regular, we call them, "plea deals," and they can end with an admission of guilt, or a demand by the courts, anger management class for example.
/r/MensRights18/11/24 06:35 PM
6

Paternity testing is only illegal in France, nowhere else (except israel), though it's illegal to order a Paternity test in another country if it's for something in France. France explicitly has this law to prevent families from breaking up.
/r/MensRights18/11/24 06:28 PM
8

How do tickets work? Will there be a live walk through or inspection?
/r/MensRights18/11/24 06:24 PM
0

Sounds like slavery stoic-pacifist mumbo-jumbo to me, but whatever keeps you happy man.
/r/MensRights18/11/24 06:21 PM
1

Dialectics are the opposite of what's needed. There should be no arguments, men are disenfranchised more and more, we need protection under the law. No engagement whatsoever should be done with an opposing side, such as feminism, it should be all rhetoric and debate, not some synthesis. We cannot work with people who see us as subhuman.
/r/MensRights18/11/24 04:28 PM
1

I don't want to convince people to do that, but it'd be a lot easier than what you're suggesting.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 08:01 PM
1

Convince them to do what?
/r/MensRights17/11/24 07:50 PM
1

But violence is a stupid option, I don't like MGTOWS, but they're right, if every man called out from work tomorrow, the entire world's economy would be ruined. That's enough of a nuclear option, and it's not even close to necessary, the results of the US election prove that men united in politics can drastically change expectations.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 06:47 PM
1

In general, it is job of the larger organization to police this, the colleges have little say.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 06:19 PM
5

The reason men never complained is because we had the right to risk it, it's always been an ever-present risk. That's why women had curfews in college dorms, because they complained about the risks. Feminists literally had to protest, "for the right to take the risk."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/11/24 06:14 PM
24

Bring back recess Turn boys into readers (stop making teens read about depressed teens every year, ffs). Work with young male's imaginations -Christina Hoff Sommers https://ideas.time.com/2013/10/28/what-schools-can-do-to-help-boys-succeed/ https://ideas.time.com/2013/08/19/school-has-become-too-hostile-to-boys/ Stop saying that arts and crafts are explicitly feminine, when the largley masculine sex has been at it for thousands of years, until recently. Example: https://ideas.time.com/2013/10/25…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/11/24 06:07 PM
0

Not every fraternity is a collectivist college cult. This language is harmful.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 05:47 PM
34

There's only like 3 non-greek-letter fraternities left, big ones anyway, and ever increasingly accepting women. Plus a couple greek-letter based fraternities that go beyond college.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 05:42 PM
7

Fraternities by definition, not necessarily greek party life.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 05:41 PM
2

5 second rule- Mel Robbins
/r/MensRights17/11/24 05:06 PM
1

Yes, our states are supposed to function as their own countries, the feds need to mind their business on social matters.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 05:05 PM
11

It came after the US election where people were blaming the male votes for Trump on male podcasters.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 04:13 PM
1

You can only cry more if a man has hurt you, per their agenda.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 04:11 PM
6

So it's not a woman's rights issue either. Someone should tell Gloria Steinem.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 04:03 PM
1

Why? That's stupid, if we wanted to go for extremes we'd all just go MGTOW. Society wouldn't last a day. But that should be a last resort. There's no reason we cannot work with current society to change it. Why would it need to be violent?
/r/MensRights17/11/24 03:42 PM
1

r/mensupportmen This sub is more for politics and actovism.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 03:39 PM
1

That's a law decided by States, the federal government would shut Nevada down if it could.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 03:33 PM
2

Where are these cheap prostitutes? Asking for a friend.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 03:32 PM
1

Always go Dutch, it ensures you are not a victim of gold digging and that people are there for you, yourself. Start a Facebook group, you got catfished.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 03:31 PM
22

Misandry happens irl. Every single day. We cannot go for a walk without the risk of harassment, not everything is the internet's fault, and maybe you shouldn't diminish serious issues. And people don't just show their sexism under the guise of anonymity, did you see The View after election day?
/r/MensRights17/11/24 03:15 PM
18

The Duluth Model, in practice, denies the possibility of innocence, and forces those who profess their innocence into thinking they're guilty. If you're falsely accused, and you're found guilty, under the Duluth Model, you will be made to admit fault. Any benefit the program would offer you will only happen after you admit your guilt. It's legalized brainwashing. It's the same idea behind, "A man may never strike a woman, even in self-defense."
/r/MensRights17/11/24 03:02 PM
1

Ask them about Marjorie Taylor Green and AOC. https://youtu.be/nemcs1OJrcM?si=lV6F6XvB-fSDh3G-
/r/MensRights16/11/24 08:40 PM
4

There're some misconceptions here. Men strive to attain their freedom in a world that imposes its constraints. If a man prioritizes freedom as his master, he may risk losing his moral compass. He could become solely interested in acting solely on personal desire and his own jackassery. And what is wrong with one's own, "jackassery?" Can someone not live for fun? For their own values, and what's valuable to them? That's what freedom is. If a man prioritizes pleasure as his master, he may indulge …
/r/MensRights16/11/24 08:07 PM
0

So you don't know anything about men's rights.
/r/MensRights16/11/24 03:25 PM
3

S Korea has a fairly concerning education gap, point still stands.
/r/MensRights16/11/24 03:13 AM
11

Ok, so you have the Literary skills of a 6yo, good to know.
/r/MensRights15/11/24 10:03 PM
1

Lucrezia Borgia was known for using poison to get rid of political rivals. Yall are acting like this is some sexist, "gotcha." This is a historical video, and clearly doesn't encourage violence against men. Whomever OP is, I believe they're trolling, and yall fell for it. Poison Rings, btw, are unisex, and were common as status symbols among nobles for their craftsmanship.
/r/MensRights15/11/24 10:00 PM
1

Ok? Men also utilized, "poison," rings. It's a historical video, not a misandrist one.
/r/MensRights15/11/24 09:55 PM
14

You're telling me you have one-on-one meetings where your boss just reads a document to you? This is a real thing, and you tolerate it? I've literally never heard anyone describe something like that in my life lmfao What country do you live in? Buddy, if you argue with your boss before she even tells you why you're in the office, then you would not survive in the vast majority of western businesses, politics, or anywhere i know of. That is literally one of the caricatures of what feminists think…
/r/MensRights15/11/24 09:31 PM
27

Grade school goes from 1st grade up to 12th grade, hence we call it, "grade school." Have you ever held a job where employees have meetings? Sounds like you've been living under a rock tbh. This is a practice with any meeting from a one-on-one, to a shift report, to a team meeting, to a board meeting, to the damn senate. You might be handed the agenda before the meeting, you may not, but it's standard practice either way, to go over the agenda.
/r/MensRights15/11/24 08:59 PM
42

It's a grade school project, and, even in workplaces, that's standard practice across fields.
/r/MensRights15/11/24 08:46 PM
-2

That video isn't that bad, that is a video essay with historical evidence. Yall can downvote me all you want, but a video explaining historical uses of these items, and historical advertisements proving that they were, in fact, intended as multi-use self-defense items, is not sexism. Yall wouldn't be complaining if someone posted the same video about the historical uses of tattoos on adulterous women.
/r/MensRights15/11/24 06:16 PM
1

Western Female only colleges popped up because of the demand for spots in education, not safety.
/r/MensRights15/11/24 06:07 PM
7

A men-only university was never considered because men were not victims of this blatant public sexual harassment. There are a handful of male-only universities left. And growing consensus that more are needed because of the education gap. https://blog.collegevine.com/the-last-all-male-colleges-in-the-us
/r/MensRights15/11/24 06:04 PM
225

During science lab our male lab partners read the directions aloud to us, and we had to remind them that we could actually read. That is called leadership, the leader reads the rules as to keep everyone on the same page, both literally and figuratively. Author just wants to be a victim.
/r/MensRights15/11/24 05:50 PM
8

Ok, so why don't we use our communication skills and redirect instead of judging someone's lived experience. What preventative measures would you put in place?
/r/MensRights15/11/24 03:29 AM
123

Mass reporting.
/r/MensRights15/11/24 12:54 AM
2

Are trains not private industries in Germany?
/r/MensRights14/11/24 11:38 PM
5

Why do people keep lobbing JP and tate together? Like, not even close to the same messages and audience.
/r/MensRights14/11/24 11:34 PM
5

There's alot of agents with a, "DEI," attitude.
/r/MensRights14/11/24 03:51 AM
3

I gotta be honest, the idea of divine masculinity is just as stupid as toxic masculinity, albeit less sexist. Like, people hate us because of the penis, not masculinity, the attack on masculinity is just an excuse to hate on men. Even Trans women are hated on much more than trans men, because of their penis.
/r/MensRights14/11/24 03:46 AM
7

That is a perfect description. People have gone on that show, answered all his questions professionally, and he still talks shit about them.
/r/MensRights14/11/24 03:39 AM
6

Lawyer up.
/r/MensRights14/11/24 03:35 AM
-6

Because it's a men's rights sub, and the vast majority of Men's Rights supporters are neither pill people nor mgtows.
/r/MensRights13/11/24 12:48 AM
-25

-checks time About 6pm EST. Yup, about the time the mgtows and pill people come out the woodwork.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 10:59 PM
15

Why would we refute that claim? It's beneficial to men's rights, and true imo.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 05:49 PM
18

Either/or, most anti male sexism is misandrist. Like, literally (and figuratively) comparing us to animals. That is a prime example of misandry.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 05:36 PM
1

It has a more diverse Christian population than Islamic, there is likely a large and powerful lobby of Muslims. There are no laws against growing out men's hair, so a counter-culture movement similar to a reformation or the hippie movements would still be the answer.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 12:32 PM
–

Ethiopia is practically an Islamic state under the Muslim Brotherhood style of Islam, you could only really do it by starting a reformation imo.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 12:17 PM
1

I don't read alot of Nietzsche, prefer Erasmus, another one that modern stoics like to claim with little to no evidence. Or even Benjamin Franklin, who, unlike the others we've mentioned, could be considered a stoic, albeit very different from modern "stoics."
/r/MensRights12/11/24 05:56 AM
17

False by investigation, not even a court.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 05:50 AM
1

Wait until you learn what's closer to 1/64, and not 1/4.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 05:45 AM
1

He hated stoics, with a passion.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 05:34 AM
1

I can't tell if you are being intentionally obtuse, or naturally obtuse.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 05:17 AM
3

In Korea? Idk, never been, just reacting to the comment.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 05:16 AM
1

You're making a lot of assumptions troll bro.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 05:14 AM
5

The ideas of due process and presumption of innocence have been under assault since before the college rape crisis, and I think many, including myself, became aware of the need for a Men's Rights movement at that time. It's still a rough subject, especially in the US after the Obama administration gave quotas and funding to universities that made them go hard against men accused of rape, kangaroo courts and all. It's not just about false accusations, John Adams is probably rolling in his grave t…
/r/MensRights12/11/24 05:10 AM
5

I learned about hagmaxxing last week, that's what young guys be doing.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 05:03 AM
1

It was literally a woman's fault. A 2 year age difference in relationship shouldn't have caused the government to ruin this dude's life. It's a common standard. What are you? Some evangelical wanting him to work 4 jobs (that he probably cant get because of a woman) to pay for child support for a kid hes not allowed to see, and a room at a roach motel?
/r/MensRights12/11/24 04:56 AM
29

You've literally been demeaning at least one person just because he was sexually harassed over being male and around 6ft. You insulted and blamed the victim.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 04:50 AM
26

No, but you clearly do, given your comments.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 04:43 AM
1

Even when I was using an established account, established here and elsewhere, I still had to wait. But the post is up now so, 🤷‍♂️
/r/MensRights12/11/24 04:00 AM
24

What do you think of chubby chasers groping fat women? Or hitting on them when it's clearly unwanted sexual harassment?
/r/MensRights12/11/24 03:41 AM
54

You're really going to sit there and tell us men discriminate in relationships more based on politics than women? Amid the 4b movement of all times?
/r/MensRights12/11/24 02:41 AM
12

I don't know how a post titled like this gets through the que at all, while mine has to wait.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 02:32 AM
2

I don't like stoicism, but it's not toxicly masculine. I dislike it on philosophical points, and their usual actions. Stoics tend to steal the wins of people who actually do the work, or impose their philosophy onto people who never utilized or believed in it, and quite a few people who criticized it, from Cicero, to Ayn Rand, to Nietzsche. They tend to do it among the MGTOWS too, it's why I don't like them. But that's stoicism at the core, not toxic masculinity.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 01:37 AM
31

Lots of hospitals and healthcare companies put stuff up for it. But I was pretty pissed at men's health month being called, "men's mental health month" online.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 01:29 AM
2

That is true, yes, I thought we were talking about selective service.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 01:05 AM
3

We really should be saying, "teach girls not to rape." That needs to be the next hashtag.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 11:16 PM
5

The education system is the institution forcing these things, a leftist stronghold. Not the conservatives. Some people literally have to fill out paperwork to get exemptions on a cultural and religious basis because this, "progressive," institution wants everyone to be the same.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 11:14 PM
3

Those people you mention aren't normally the issue, not as much as others, like 3rd wave feminists. It's certainly not the people you mention enforcing dress codes, which are mainly in grade schools, a leftist institution. The movement is captive to female chauvinists, who want to just emphasize how bad men are. -Feminist Christina Hoff Sommers Let boys be boys! -also Christina Hoff Sommers Literally just speak out like that.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 11:11 PM
8

Narcissus drowned because he was in love with his reflection. Hercules committed suicide. Theseus tripped and fell to death. Perseus died of old age.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/24 10:52 PM
5

Grendel wasn't part of society. It was a monster in a cave. Criminals are isolated freaks, they are not normal people, it's not toxic masculinity that makes criminals do crime. And they're a percentage of a percentage of the population. You're literally just using, "toxic masculinity," to be sexist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/24 10:13 PM
7

Idk if I'd use the term, "demigod," there's a lot tragic endings, I mean, Hercules was fooled into killing his kids, Aeneas lost everything before the final betrayal, Achilles died like Achilles. Enkidu was meant to fight Gilgamesh, and dies after befriending him. Demigod is definitely not the right word choice. Narcissus certainly doesn't fit much of the description. Hero or Knight, might be better terms.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/24 10:11 PM
2

Obama didn't, Wilson, Roosevelt II, Truman, and LBJ did though, obama is of the same group.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 10:00 PM
1

No one fetishishizes gay men like straight women.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 09:41 PM
1

How is it encouraging conflict to say "Are the men of this sub too ashamed to admit they fuck over their fellow man?" They do! I've been in these MRA groups for a decade on and off now, revisiting since I've dropped the batshit ideology some 2 or 3 years ago. The issues that you guys discuss are very real, and the effects on men that you all have concern for are very real. Then it's time to discuss solutions, and instead of admitting that 9/10 societal problems faced by men are perpetuated by th…
/r/MensRights11/11/24 07:08 PM
1

Not really, how are they going to get the skin cells?
/r/MensRights11/11/24 12:25 PM
-3

Beowulf took risks because he believes it was in his own best interests to do so. We was paid out the ass by the Danes. Nothing should be taken literally, it's not telling kids to go out and kill trolls for bragging rights. It teaches a different way to look at the scars one has. Just teaches a non-sacrificial masculinity in general.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 12:10 PM
6

Beowulf, the poem, is Anglo-saxon. Not the character.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 12:02 PM
-22

What state, mine wasn't like that at all, we learned state history and writing until like 8th grade, then I read nothing but books about emo teens until 12th grade, when we finally read beowulf in full, even then we still had to read -Speak- another depressing teenage novel. We only read parts of classic literature from the textbook until my last English teacher in grade school had us read beowulf. In that same chapter, they talked about a city where men had to pay 70 mxn pesos to attend a festi…
/r/MensRights11/11/24 06:34 AM
10

That is false, prove it.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 05:33 AM
2

I don't see an issue with sex tourism, it's prostitution with extra steps, and i don't have a problem with sex work.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 04:59 AM
20

No one likes Julie Bindel. She's a man-hater, and a TERF. Just an angry b@tch in general.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 04:54 AM
20

MGTOW, sort of, mgtows are slightly better, they don't usually use their ideas to impose a vote.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 04:23 AM
11

Historically, neither illegal immigrants, nor refugees were safe from selective service. If it gets to such a point, the border will likely open up completely, and anyone who signs on would be given citizenship. That's what we did to the Irish. There might be propositions to draft any illegal alien caught, and there are, at this moment, benefits for Non-citizens to join up, though there are restrictions. Those restrictions are easily relaxed as needed.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 03:00 AM
1

The over 2 million standing troops who've volunteered. Republicans especially have made sure to well fund the military.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 02:57 AM
1

In reality things like 4b, MGTOW, & Incels are just theories and people apply things however they wish. The issue here with a lot of left leaning women avoiding Trump supporters is strongly based on idealogy, but it's just that many women are heterosexual so their dating life is going to be based on selecting for men. If they were looking for friends or roommates then they would apply the same thought process for women and avoid conservative women for the same reason. No, they're movements, howe…
/r/MensRights11/11/24 12:18 AM
1

Disagree, it's not a zero-sum game. But so long as AA policies are used, it won't be a meritocracy either. Women are perfectly capable of competing in a meritocracy, the left just believes no one should, except the perceived oppressors.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 10:18 PM
0

He's low-brow like Chloe Roma, less entertaining than her too, i don't hold a lot of respect there.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 10:12 PM
4

Assuming you're left of Christina Hoff Sommers, Karen DeCrow, RIP, agreed with many statements of the MRM. Affirmative action for fathers. Gender neutral draft. Etc.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 10:11 PM
1

Christina hoff Sommers Jordan Peterson is alright, not my favorite. Karen Straughen Dadvocate Brett Cooper is alright, doesn't focus on men. Roma Army rounds out the influencer scene, controversial and low-brow. Cloe Roma is her name. There's that one black youtuber, I'm ashamed i can't remember his channel, who talks about black male issues in a way that isn't controversial. Warren Farrell is a common one, he used to be like Richard Reeves before feminism Betrayed him. Janice Fiamengo Honey Bad…
/r/MensRights10/11/24 10:07 PM
2

You think people are having an issue with 4b's celibacy?
/r/MensRights10/11/24 09:48 PM
2

Just so you're clear on what's happening in this post, OP is gay, and reached out here, a sub which has a straight majority. 99% of the the people commenting are welcoming, and hospitable. You're literally the 1% who is encouraging conflicts. It is not the responsibility of men to apologize for your abusers. It is not the responsibility of modern men to apologize for the cultures of the past. It is not the fault of men that many cultures aren't accepting of lgbt people.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 09:43 PM
2

If 4b was just about celibacy, there would be no issues . But they've decided to openly dehumanize over half the human species. They're not about safety.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 09:10 PM
5

The idea is the issue. That they think denying sex would have so much influence over men, that shows they don't find men to be equal humans. If you don't see sexism in a gender reversed statement, that's your perogative, but it is sexist.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 07:41 PM
2

Exactly
/r/MensRights10/11/24 07:38 PM
4

What is the goal here, except to undermine straight men reaching out to lgbt men? Because that is what you are doing.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 07:37 PM
5

The straw man arguments about what I said. -I never said that women discriminate more, I said that gays only face as much discrimination as everyone else. I said that those who are victimized are most often victimized by a hostile environment fostered by their fellow man, which is just a historical fact You are exaggerating, that is not an issue caused explicitly by men, in my experience it's more often women, and it's very dependent on culture. What your claiming is a gross distortion of facts.…
/r/MensRights10/11/24 07:20 PM
5

As a bisexual who knows many an lgbt person, I am correct. You are literally Fear-mongering, you twist my words over a little push back against the narrative that every gay is a victim. You're straw-manning.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 07:14 PM
5

You don't seem to be hearing me, no. If men said, "we're denying females sexual pleasure until they vote the way we tell them to," which is what 4b is saying. Then, I call you a liar, or a fool, if you wouldn't call that sexist. And men are not boycotting sex, simple abstinence is apolitical.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 07:08 PM
5

Not centuries, it mostly started in the 1900s, the, "heteronormative," part at least. Even so, it's simply not the case anymore, no more than the amount of women who hate men, vice versa. Most gays today, especially younger ones, have fear because people like you say things like this, not because of a traumatic, possibly abuse related, event.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 07:04 PM
2

I'd say, second date, not ASAP. Better even after the second date, but definitely not the first date. Ideally in a friendship stage.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 06:37 PM
4

I'm saying mgtow doesn't impose upon women based on their beliefs of women. I'm saying 4b is not isolationist.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 06:26 PM
7

Isolationists don't use make their Isolation a weapon to influence votes. Smart ones certainly don't do so based on sexist beliefs.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 06:14 PM
5

See, this is the problem. You're only acknowledging the false idea that people are complaining about withholding sex, they're not. MGTOWS avoid relationships to avoid the risk of drama and abuse, and only say things along those lines. They're not trying to boycott women into voting a certain way because of a sexist view of women. 4b is attempting to impose upon men under the idea that men only care about sex. The fact that you see this as an issue of intercourse, and not sexism, suggests that yo…
/r/MensRights10/11/24 06:03 PM
7

You don't need chatter when there's video evidence. All saying they didn't like the way men voted, so they're denying sex until that changes. The actual goal is clear, and it's not safety. They're literally doing what pro-life people want them to, being abstinent. Additionally, most pro-life people are women, so 4b women are just choosing to be sexist.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 05:00 PM
5

Women swearing off sex is literally what pro-life people want. Go ask them. Their answer to the question of abortion is literally abstinence. Most pro-lifers are other women. These 4b women are just being sexist.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 04:48 PM
10

It is objectifying because it reduces men to sex objects. It treats men as if we're animals, who's entire human existence revolves around the vagina. They're saying, "we're going to make men change their vote by conducting a boycott of sex." It's the very definition of objectification, they're not seeing men as humans with our own goals and beliefs, they're saying they believe we're only dogs who'll do anything for a handy.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 04:03 PM
29

And Republicans literally want this. They're doing exactly what the anti-abortionists want.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 03:45 PM
3

And I'm not trying to be difficult. I really just want to understand why coercing people into having sex by saying withhold their basic needs is a valid option. pretty scary way to look at entitlement to another person's body. It just struck me like that so I added my perspective. He only said he'd boycott, not get rid of other rights. Literally the main protest method of 4b. The male perspective to 4b is, "idc, possibly offended, I'm not a sex object, I'm a human being."
/r/MensRights10/11/24 03:42 PM
8

Except that is explicitly not the reason 4b exists. It uses a sexist idea of men to state that a denial of sex will make us do whatever they want.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 03:38 PM
12

These 4b women are the epitome of average sexism against men. It's clear they believe men only care about sex, that we must have dog-brains. This disgust among men isn't about the sex, it's about the objectification.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 03:34 PM
8

Do you defend red pill? Mgtow? Black pill? If you refuse to defend our extremists, don't defend theirs.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 03:30 PM
25

There needn't be any counter, they can sit out all they want. Sex isn't a main driver of any man, except those who already agree with them. Their objectification of men is a reason their party lost, and they're just objectifying more with 4b. The best reaction is to shut up and let them cook til they fizzle out or backfire. When an enemy is making a fool of themselves, you shut up and let them do it.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 03:25 PM
1

I'm an MRA. I talk to these people regularly, what you describe as bp is usually in rp. Bp people are more often nihilistic and pessimistic. They don't believe there's any hope, and there's nothing you can say to change their mind, they're rare and most likely of these three radical groups to off themselves. Mgtows are not passport bros, that is also an rp thing. There's a pro-stoicism attitude among mgtows, that makes them ridiculously stubborn, but the nature of stoicism often keeps people hap…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/24 03:09 PM
4

Have you met any member of the human race? We are naturally drawn to the aesthetic.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 03:35 AM
3

Skirts are best for men, healthier. The air flow increases sperm virility, or count, idr, it's supposed to be physically healthier. It's also more comfortable, nothing like the breeze. We should bring back proper tunics. With or without hosen. https://www.pinterest.com/pin/132926626500415820/
/r/MensRights10/11/24 03:02 AM
2

Bible logic stated to stick with whatever tf nice attire was there in any given time and area, specifically in the Church.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 02:55 AM
2

There are long hairstyles considered professional for men today, Kurt Cobain's hairstyle is even considered professional. It's pretty much just the military, even there I'm pretty sure there are exceptions.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 02:53 AM
1

It was some sort of political sacrifice on the republican part. What was, essentially, a federally protected right, was lessened to a state right. Though, the insanity of the democrats may have simply emboldened the Republicans on abortion.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 01:47 AM
1

I voted for Kamala for the democrats position on health insurance. But it really was a win/win for me. I've known some lesbians to vote conservative too, the abortion issue looms over women, even those who disagree with the practice. I mean, I'm mostly pro-life, and even I said the court's decision was politically idiotic. Trump could have turned every state if it didn't happen.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 01:32 AM
7

Don't roll gays in there, LGBT people are split between the parties too. Really women are as well, it wasn't that big of a percentage either way.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 12:22 AM
2

This is far from the same situation as 1930s Germany, and the right haven't been the ones rioting, shooting people, otherwise attempting to silence people who disagree with them, or attempting to assassinate their political opposition. All things from fascist and other authoritarian playbooks. You're Fear-mongering. Who are you speaking to? Neither the individual attitudes among Republicans, nor their policies suggest what you're saying. As far as immigration goes, Republicans just want the immi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/24 12:18 AM
9

Women get custody in 65% of cases. I find it hard to believe that few of them are alleging abuse. Very unlikely.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 07:57 PM
2

No, Vance isn't that bad. He's known to be easy to work with. He's known to be a good parent. He's harder on abortion than Trump. Generally promotes fatherhood and marriage. He's in favor of gun rights. He has the traditional, view of immigration, and supports the European Style laws that all the conservatives support. He's open about puritan views of marriage, but explicitly states that he's not going after lgbt marriages. Like most conservatives, he is against gender transition surgeries for m…
/r/MensRights09/11/24 07:51 PM
12

They don't need to explicitly state that they hate men. It's not just, "some women." Nearly every woman I've worked with, in every field I've worked in has blamed men, to my face, for some thing or another thing completely within their control.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 07:30 PM
17

Less than 2%
/r/MensRights09/11/24 07:21 PM
0

Obama. I'm not sure i agree with that amendment anyway, we went over 100 years without it. FDR died on his 4th term.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 03:30 PM
10

You may as well switch, Republicans may tell you to fix your own problems, but the democrats abandoned the pro-labour policies they probably won you over with. They shouldn't say they're for, "the working class," when they backstab them in important moments, like the trucker strike. I also voted Harris, but all they got at this point is healthcare policy.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 09:22 AM
9

The democrats under biden literally backstabbed the workers, see the Trucker Strike, about the time Biden called on the Canadian government to do something about it, they froze the protestor's assets. That is worse. All the drafts in the US since Lincoln were done under Democrat Presidencies. Both older and newer Republicans are far more willing to avert war than the democrats, the Bush Republicans are Not the heads of the party anymore. Lip service is better than overt misandry. I've stated my …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/11/24 07:36 AM
7

That, "we don't need no man," language is really coming back to haunt them politically.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/11/24 05:43 AM
3

Damn right he's right, they didn't just abandon the working class, the democrats backstabbed them worse than the Republicans ever could.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/11/24 05:41 AM
2

Isn't blackpill just mgtow, but worse?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/11/24 05:38 AM
4

This hasn't been my experience in the US south unfortunately. Most men don't want to talk about difficult topics, will shut you down even. I suspect it's because they have alot of unprocessed grief or fear of the person becoming overbearing and clingy. They'd rather just focus on whatever activity is in front of you or keep it light hearted. Completely disagree. 27 years of the Opposite experience, south of Maryland.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/11/24 05:37 AM
1

You are the rare example. We may have spoken before, this is a fourth-sixth account, idr.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 04:44 AM
1

There is, in fact, a formal definition. https://www.dictionary.com/e/acronyms/mgtow/ You might like this definition, but, aside from you and one or two others I've seen here, every self-proclaimed mgtow I've met fits my, and the wiki, definition, and I've met many. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men_Going_Their_Own_Way
/r/MensRights09/11/24 04:40 AM
1

That's obtuse. There are few groups that self-isolate, I didn't say they did that, i said MGTOWS tend to check out of society, not just dating. And you're conveniently ignoring the rest of the comment. If you call yourself a mgtow, and you participate in society, then you don't fit the definition of a mgtow.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 03:59 AM
1

you may or may not be one of them, but most mgtows don't just avoid dating, they avoid everything that makes society a society, even the politically active ones promoting it here don't seem to realize that most MGTOWS withdraw from every part of society except their personal bubble. It's not a problem until they start coming to political subs to convert people. I despise the stoicism mostly, the rest of us will be fighting and politiking, and, if we lose, the stoicism will make them say, "it was…
/r/MensRights09/11/24 03:49 AM
7

Explain.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/11/24 03:47 AM
1

No, it's foolish. He only believes he has everything against him, because he thinks he knows what women want, when he doesn't.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 03:16 AM
1

What about perception, I've been with both men and women, I'm certainly well below the beauty standards. What do you want to do to OP? Help him self-victimize? He already believes he has everything against him in relationships and sex, and it's just not true, I refuse to validate that.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 03:03 AM
-2

It's about 50/50 with women, and the 50% who weren't pleased just weren't into it, felt like humping air frankly. We're talking about the mechanics of penis size, and whether it matters in pleasure or not.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 02:54 AM
1

I have to warn you, I match energy, and it's rarely wholesome.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/11/24 02:49 AM
-3

What are you, "huh" -ing me about? Have you never heard someone say, "give me that dick!" It's pretty common in pornography, usually it's just, "give it to me," but that's just the same thing.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 02:47 AM
20

Does menslib even let people here comment?
/r/MensRights09/11/24 02:42 AM
1

Modern relationships are common, always keep separate finances. And go-bags, men need them more than women, we're more likely to become homeless and get kicked out the house.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 02:40 AM
2

It was a win-win for me. I voted kamala for healthcare issues. But the Republicans are much better for men, all men. There's a lot of fear mongering, but as an LGB person, I recognize that it's mostly unfounded. They're not taking marriage liscenses, they're not killing gays. They want to make sure sexuality is not taught in schools, and it should be obvious to you if you're a trans person who doesn't pass enough to make women comfortable in the bathroom (i think if you have to pee, you have to …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/11/24 02:33 AM
1

True, but it's a very feminist thing to let people sit in their perception of victimhood.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 02:11 AM
8

I am LGBT, we do have the luxury, just because you're afraid of radical religious people, doesn't mean that they're the ones controlling the Republicans. I've never felt more hate than that from the democrats. And there's plenty of non-white people who have good reasons to support them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/11/24 02:10 AM
4

It was a win-win for me, I only voted Kamala for the healthcare promises. I've voted 3 different parties in the 3-4 elections I've voted in.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/11/24 01:31 AM
0

It's not a problem until they start coming to political subs to convert people. I despise the stoicism mostly, the rest of us will be fighting and politiking, and, if we lose, the stoicism will make them say, "it was an unwinnable battle," and deny that they hurt the cause. But if we win they'll say, "we were right, our way caused this win." Every stoic in history did that shit, and it's the reason i dislike mgtow and red pills the most, they really enjoy posting about Aurelius and Epictetus too…
/r/MensRights09/11/24 01:23 AM
1

The only surveys I've heard about regarding this topic were discussed by Christina Hoff Sommers in her videos and writing. Idk if this is the same, but the questions were reportedly very leading.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 01:16 AM
18

Jokes on you, I'm bisexual, with a preference for men.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 01:08 AM
0

Yall sound like Aquariuses.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 01:03 AM
2

I do when I see something. But you can look at Roma Army to see why you can't find anyone talking, she gets banned and reported for hate speech all the time, and she's a woman. Granted, she can be pretty low-brow about it, but it's still an example. Conservative media won't take people who refuse to make men out to be predators, and joining an established political media group is the only way to securely speak.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 01:00 AM
21

I doubt cat calls have happened since the mid 2000s. At this point you just want to silence people from any noise whatsoever. A guy could be whistling at his own leisure, and you'd fine him 1000$.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 12:56 AM
-3

Every man I've fucked said, "Give me that little dick." It's about 50/50 with women, and the 50% who weren't pleased just weren't into it, felt like humping air frankly. It really is what you do with it, not how big it is. Unless you have a micropenis. I'm 5/7, large body. Have straight hair. Am a nerd. You are fine, it's the confidence.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 12:45 AM
1

No one here said it should be banned, you're self-victimising to avoid the conversation.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 12:35 AM
-4

Basically, yes, you may or may not be one of them, but most mgtows don't just avoid dating, they avoid everything that makes society a society, even the politically active ones promoting it here don't seem to realize that most MGTOWS withdraw from every part of society except their personal bubble.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 12:31 AM
69

Never liked Reeves, he's a Trojan Horse, more a MensLib type. But he's right there, those ads were sexist.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 12:22 AM
10

Im right-of-center, I voted Kamala, it's literally 2017 all over again, and the democrats didn't even get the popular vote this time, they want to wallow in victimhood.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/11/24 12:18 AM
13

The left isn't just exclusionary to men, they're openly insulting. All the Drafts in living memory in the US have happened in times of democrat control. The only thing they have rn is healthcare policy, but we can't trust them, because they used to be pro-labour as well, and they proved they would backstab the workers during the Trucker Strike.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/11/24 12:17 AM
-3

Yes, I was there when MGTOW was becoming popular, and it's considered a bit extremist now because it took up the views I mentioned, it's not just avoiding the dating scene.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 12:11 AM
1

Alright, hit me.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 12:09 AM
2

Why do you think that? People say it all the time. I don't like it, but you're not being censored.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 12:04 AM
-2

I'd be okay with it if it were a movement based on non-stoic, pro-society philosophy, and if it could be assured that it has explicit doctrines preventing red pill ideas, and prevents the views of Estar Vilar, we don’t need yet another radical sub-group out there.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 12:01 AM
0

Yall would be taken more seriously if you stopped spreading that misinformation, js.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 11:56 PM
6

Over half.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 11:48 PM
14

Of course they are, their next president is taking their right to their own bodies away, is a rapist, talks about women like they’re dogs and hung out with 2 traffickers, Epstein and Diddy. The only thing that's true there is the last part, and a whole lot of people have connections to Epstein and Diddy, including Kamala and the large amount of celebrities who supported her. Trump has long been Pro-choice. If a misandrist who wanted to control mens bodys won the election you guys would be losing…
/r/MensRights08/11/24 11:47 PM
11

You're assuming you know which side I take in that, "genocide." And it matters because it shows that men are seen as disposable.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 11:10 PM
1

Those ads were downright sexist, they were the sole way democrats had to reach male vote. Involved in these ads were messages stating that anyone who doesn't vote for Kamala is a sexist. Andrew Tate has literally no influence, not even as much as the, "vocal minority," you're talking about. Trump is only allegedly a rapist, in fact, Stormy Daniels, the main person democrats insist he raped, stated on multiple records that it wasn't rape, and, "they just ran with that." It's only alleged that he …
/r/MensRights08/11/24 11:10 PM
2

Feminists movements started as women entered the workplace and the majority of women began demanding suffrage. Most men agreed, and the media depictions of the men in the period are perfect examples of man-hate. The men supported the women more than the women did. Did you know who Karen DeCrow, or Camille Paglia, or Christina Hoff Sommers were before you came here? Those are good feminists. Today's average feminists largely behave as Gloria Steinem style feminists, willing to throw anyone who di…
/r/MensRights08/11/24 09:04 PM
4

What makes you think they're a vocal minority? If they weren't a vocal majority, Karen DeCrow, Christina Hoff Sommers, and Camille Paglia would be household names among feminists, and we wouldn't be seeing so much hate. Anyone who acts like Steinem, or worse, would be considered extremists, not applauded as heroes. Your party's only saving grace was on Labour Policies, and they abandoned that attitude when it counted most, see the Trucker Strike. It wasn't just feminism, it was your party who ra…
/r/MensRights08/11/24 08:52 PM
3

Gynecologists tell women to go to dermatologists all the time. If it's a concern with your skin, that's literally their specialty, they don't just handle skin tags and eczema.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 08:30 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter