TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ExcitingEnergy3 Archive

View 0 posts and 64 comments by ExcitingEnergy3 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Hate to be the devil's advocate here, but that's not true. I don't understand how guys/men operate on this: men will bust a nut in a hooker/whore, and then claim it's not work? That's BS, and it shows. I get this sub is all about calling out women, but let's keep it real: lots of guys have issues with logical thinking. Lots of men would do anything to bed a hot woman — so if she's making $ off of it, that doesn't mean it's not work. Try talking to a sex worker, and UNDERSTAND how much prep has t…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/01/22 01:41 AM
2

Sorry, but being friends with your ex, in general, isn't a good idea.
/r/seduction08/01/22 02:09 AM
1

Being short (subjective, since men's height vary by country) is (generally) a setback when it comes to women. One can debate how much, but that's subjective. As always, different women value different things, but one that I consistently note cross-culturally (I can speak four languages, and lived in 4 countries at an age of < 30) is that if you want the good-looking ones, $ can be a deciding factor. The value of $ also increases in patriarchal cultures (such as the one I come from), such that be…
/r/seduction08/01/22 02:04 AM
1

Things like “ if you’re ugly you need to be rich” No bro, that's true to a large extent. I don't like to get into pointless and trite arguments, but to deny the value of financial stability/wealth is borderline insane, no offense intended. As for inner confidence, the least $ can do for you IS increasing your confidence. ($ is a signal to women that you can beat the odds and rise up the social hierarchy. It lends you social status, which leads to increased attraction levels from women. But it's …
/r/seduction07/01/22 09:55 PM
0

I don't understand what you mean by hypergamy is fake. The idea is that women will typically date equal or up (in the social hierarchy). Men will often date/marry down (because they're forced to). Both genders are "hypergamous", but it is NOT symmetric. It's asymmetric (else most men would have been polygamous in ancient times, which they weren't).
/r/ExRedPill27/12/21 03:31 AM
1

And $300K is not less than 3% IIRC.
/r/ExRedPill22/08/21 08:47 PM
3

Yes, that's like DUH right there. Only some men are rich (very few). Men get better with age implies that their financial and social status gets better as they age (obviously assuming things go well). Nitpicking just for the heck of it isn't going to help you here.
/r/ExRedPill21/07/21 12:45 AM
1

It's obvious from the first paragraph that you're married. That's OK. I'm not interested in marriage so no debate. As for not understanding, it means "I don't think this concept is valuable". Many cultures that the RP men think are "conducive" to men are actually highly misogynistic and "men lead" there (to use the RP term). You can explain what that means to you, but be assured I typically don't take married men's advice too seriously. (Your marriage maybe good, but that's just on the face of i…
/r/TheRedPill08/05/21 01:23 PM
1

The first two are against your point of view. Kids being expensive is empirical, not "I think so". The last paragraph is more like a comment in passing, since I never see men in non-Western cultures talking about "leading" (I'm not Western).
/r/TheRedPill08/05/21 12:33 PM
1

Correct. Dating in the Western world is sexual capitalism. (In the US it's hyper-capitalism, both economic and sexual.)
/r/TheRedPill08/05/21 01:50 AM
1

Most men in LTRs I know aren't "happy" or talking of "infinite rewards". As for creating "replications", sure. If you're pro-natalism. Some aren't, and even those who have "replications" know it's effing EXPENSIVE. Don't understand the "leading" in LTR, but I guess that's just an RP thing. I really don't understand what "leading" means, but that's another debate for another time.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/21 01:35 AM
1

Most people mistake an aimless life for "nihilism". You were aimless, not nihilistic. (I see why you used that word, but just saying). Congratulations on coming out so far ahead in life.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/21 01:24 AM
1

Don't bother with what IF. You can't control many things. So be it. And yes that's an extreme position as I see it.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/21 01:16 AM
1

Most people I know are married, but the divorce rate is still 50%. You know less than you think you know. I know several average Joes in relationship, yet there's rich good looking men who can't get a girlfriend. And so on.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/21 01:11 AM
1

Thanks to aspies like you who've limited vocabulary, the word "incel" has lost its meaning. Just like "woke" and "Nazi". Don't post BS comments like this if you don't agree with the OP.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/21 01:09 AM
2

Yeah I get mad when idiots like you chime in.
/r/askTRP12/02/21 07:04 AM
3

O I'm sorry I didn't know I was dealing with a fucking blue pill idiot who gets tRiGgeRreD over the use of the word pussy. And then proceeds to show their homophobia by calling me "gay trashie" along with using physical stature as a pejorative. What a small small world full of morons like you with bloated egos on here lecturing strangers. SHUT THE FUCK UP. As for he betrayed his allies, I'm not here for your dumbass history lessons. OK? Don't try to teach ME about those cliches like diversity an…
/r/askTRP07/02/21 06:35 AM
3

How is that a negative? Napoleon wasn't lying - he was slaying shit and pussy. On the contrary, people will label anything a short dude does Napoleon cOmPleX (when they don't like it). Aware of the term, applies to some situations- just making it clear it's like a useless term because of overuse in the wrong ways (just like "toxic masculinity"), if that makes sense.
/r/askTRP07/02/21 05:24 AM
4

As for the "Napoleon complex" never got that term. How is that a negative is beyond me. But somehow we're here and if a bitch thinks you're "acting out" cuz you're "short and trying to make up for it" hard next. (Unless you're acting like an arse for no good reason).
/r/askTRP07/02/21 12:10 AM
2

On probabilities, you're right.
/r/askTRP07/02/21 12:08 AM
12

On this forum, if you're not "spinnin' 'em plates" or not "smashing 'em HB 8s/9s" i.e. "literally drowning in P" then you're an "incel". The problem with dimwits (and most really are that) on this forum is the twisting of the concept of fucking. It's a notch-count race, just like "who's making the most $, bi**ches?" That kinda stuff. If you're defining stuff like that, then yeah, you're gonna feel like an incel too. Most don't get this - so here we are. I'm not from this culture, and most of us …
/r/askTRP06/02/21 11:52 PM
11

Sorry to disappoint you, but I'm barely 5'6''. Don't know how you got those numbers - you a data scientist bruh?
/r/askTRP06/02/21 08:29 PM
1

If you think academics are fighting for "Chad leftovers" then I think you're not operating on planet Earth. FWIW - if you're replying to me, you have to be clear so that I can respond in kind. If you rant like that idiot was doing, then I'd have to block you too. I don't have patience for people who don't understand how the real word works.
/r/askTRP06/02/21 06:51 AM
0

Academics don't "bed women" in their prime. Sorry, but you're an idiot who doesn't know shit - neither business or academia. I BLOCK idiots on here - and you've shown plenty of evidence you are one.
/r/askTRP04/02/21 01:35 AM
1

By your logic, no academic or businessman should be married or be in a relationship. But plenty are. Also, if you think this way, you need some help.
/r/askTRP04/02/21 12:57 AM
8

FWIW - being a criminal isn't an exciting background. As for stable, it depends. If you go for graduate school, don't expect to start a career before 26-27. Possibly 30. So yeah that's probably stable, and "boring". That's just how it is.
/r/askTRP03/02/21 11:50 PM
7

COVID is a cunt. I thank you for being so eloquent.
/r/askTRP03/02/21 11:48 PM
3

Good for you - but this is where you ask questions. Lectures on the other subreddit, please.
/r/askTRP03/02/21 11:47 PM
1

There's a distinction to be made between "he calls her a slut/bitch" and "not giving an eff". Not giving a fuck is not necessarily a consequence of having too many options - it is a consequence of "having a life". Which could mean anything.
/r/askTRP01/02/21 04:57 PM
9

Because most women are mentally unstable as well as emotionally. No sensible girl would want to be treated like that. That's it. All this "o but he has options" is almost entirely untrue.
/r/askTRP31/01/21 09:23 AM
2

Hey - happy to help. PM me if you'd like.
/r/askTRP28/01/21 03:59 AM
2

THIS.
/r/askTRP14/01/21 05:19 AM
1

MainStream Media (MSM)
/r/askTRP14/01/21 05:18 AM
3

"Money" is subjective - looks you like don't make much or don't have plenty just like he doesn't "fuck much".
/r/askTRP11/01/21 07:55 AM
21

Classic example of misunderstanding what game really is - and yes it earns men a bad rep for no reason. Next time, maybe try and understand why those feminists are "so bitter and angry". Really- some introspection needed. Not dunking on anybody here or trying to "defend" those "crazy feminazis" but yeah. Game really is an explosive when used being by an amateur - and understandable why MSM disparages it. Having said that, my suggestion is to think before you leap, and try to observe if you're do…
/r/askTRP11/01/21 06:39 AM
3

Women never actually want a guy to be vulnerable - there are exceptions of course. Also, most men don't really understand being "vulnerable", incl. I'd argue TRP sphere. I get why it's discouraged, as part of maintaining "mystery" aka power dynamic (which is the real aphrodisiac for women, manifested in various manners) but there is a crucial distinction between vulnerability and being a crybaby moron.
/r/askTRP11/01/21 06:32 AM
4

Glad to see someone who agrees that yes, a "playah" lifestyle has a "cost" (i.e. emotional labor). Needs to be posted in the blackpill crybabies' subreddit.
/r/askTRP11/01/21 06:29 AM
12

You need to decide if I'm a gay or a slut you low IQ turd. The least you can do is to learn some more interesting words and not act like you're epileptic. Fuck off.
/r/askTRP09/01/21 03:31 AM
15

You just blew your cover man - that's why I say that all those who claim to "be getting laid" are just peddling hot air. You clearly are so worked up by a comment of mine that you ended up calling me gay - as if being gay is somehow bad. What a retarded mindset to have.
/r/askTRP09/01/21 03:28 AM
-7

No I believe this by reading both liberal and conservative media outlets and magazines. Not everyone is "swayed" by the media as people on this sub seem to believe.
/r/askTRP09/01/21 03:26 AM
8

The OP is hilarious - ngl. Dude, if you have options as you claim here, you wouldn't be asking this question. You'd be securing "new leads".
/r/askTRP09/01/21 02:00 AM
-13

Being secure in your beliefs is different from being a deluded idiot like most right-wingers typically are. And yeah, dunking on RWs for a reason - since most people think the left is the home of all evils.
/r/askTRP09/01/21 01:58 AM
1

Typically you learn to not saying the wrong things and not fucking shit up is by being a loner and learning to keep quiet. It's hard work - you can be a macho dude working at the US National Guard and still being a "bitch" as you said. Alpha is a mindset game. You've got the optics perhaps not the frame. My two cents: stop seeing her as much as you can, and see what happens. If she breaks up with you, so be it. There's more out there (if you really ARE in shape, and work a good job, you should b…
/r/askTRP27/11/20 12:31 AM
2

I'm glad it helped - if I may suggest " Wont lie tho, she still gonna go into my mysterious box of "Wtf just happened" and gonna spend time trying to find reasons even if there isnt one" lol. " is probably not a good idea. Speaking from experience, (or lack thereof), if you've got exams, I'd focus on those rather than securing a solid plate or musing about why you lost it. I've been in the fortunate position to have taught STEM majors to people from various backgrounds - at top US schools - and …
/r/askTRP27/11/20 12:05 AM
1

Was always like this bro - it's TRP after all.
/r/askTRP26/11/20 08:08 AM
2

Looks aren't really in the eyes of a beholder - entirely. (This is obv a phil discussion: aesthetics). Is beauty *objective* ? By objective, it is typically meant not in the cosmic sense, but on a systemic scale (i.e. what features are considered attractive by a vast majority of humans). We all know a strong, masculine jawline and a symmetric, V-shaped body is *objectively* attractive, no matter what. So yeah, it's not entirely objective but there's some baseline. E.g. Almost any girl would appr…
/r/askTRP26/11/20 07:21 AM
1

You're doing aite if you bangin' her (not this specific chick, any). FFS - how else do you think prophets/kings got top-shelf poon and LOTs of it? Yep - they claimed to be "prophets". (Biggest lie a man could tell). On the contrary, you don't get to sleep with her, that's bad. FWIW - this advice of "be yourself" and *in your face* kinda alpha is just a load of hot garbage. You gotta be somewhat agreeable, but not entirely (if that makes sense). That's at least how it is where I come from - you g…
/r/askTRP26/11/20 07:14 AM
2

Alpha is a mindset, not a demographic. Most rich dudes are boring, and beta (sexually). There's no one kinda alpha to be clear.
/r/askTRP26/11/20 07:10 AM
4

If you're young and broke: looks (FWIW - tall dude with shit face is NOT good looks. It's a package. Does include dressing but we're keeping that in status for now). If you're "mature" (think 26+) then status + money carry somewhat higher weight than looks (which would include dressing and physique). Hopefully makes sense. (It's not either/or, it's a combination with different weights for each variable dependent on context, age range and chick's archetype).
/r/askTRP26/11/20 07:09 AM
2

Hey bud - you're ONLY 22. Sounds trivial but honestly don't go for any LTR (I had one that lasted for 6-9 months at your age, never got into a serious rel after that). FWIW - you need to *learn* to be alone. Put some work into your finances (most likely shoddy at this age), if you've done college, even better, means you can fetch high-end 5 figs/low six-fig salary from the get-go. Work for a few years, then go back to graduate school (even if for a Master's). You'll observe uuge changes in your …
/r/askTRP26/11/20 07:02 AM
1

Yes they're almost all the same - across the spectrum (Confession: I've seen/dated women as young as 18/19 up to 32/33, including single, divorced, married (!)). Yes they're all the same: they thrive on attention, they can be petulant, and they typically like trash talk (no chick likes a rant on Hayek for example, if that makes sense). The problem may extend outside of intersexual dynamics i.e. chicks talking trash ALL the time, and in my experience, this is true for the average American lady. T…
/r/askTRP26/11/20 06:54 AM
4

Best way is to ignore IMO. Chicks have a habit of doing this even IF a "relationship" is going "great". They basically operate on "cycles" of emotions cuz that's how they're wired (no big deal - it's just bio at the end). Along with ignoring her (AND keeping yourself busy) you may wanna consider "exploring" a lil bit - always tell fellas "keep hunting". We read about "plate theory" all the time on this sub and elsewhere in the manosphere, but it's basically basic pscyh: people need to feel "secu…
/r/askTRP26/11/20 06:50 AM
11

Guy near 30 here: yes, your friends group WILL dwindle as you approach thirties. (Coming from a non-US/NA/EU/Western culture, this starts to happen as early as 25-26.) My 2 cents: Develop a hobby or two outside work (I'm assuming you work: FWIW, I am a graduate student so kinda used to being "lonely" if that makes sense). You can always go out on your own - buy yourself a nice drink (i.e. upscale liquor), watch a movie by yourself, read (I read tonnes while I was working and lived alone away fro…
/r/askTRP26/11/20 02:22 AM
-1

Here comes another intellectual parroting anti-science garbage.
/r/askTRP24/11/20 04:22 AM
1

Didn't expect fucking morons with such stances on COVID on this sub - but hey, this is a gift that keeps giving. Keep it up, TRP idiots.
/r/askTRP24/11/20 04:21 AM
1

No '10' "genuinely" wants to fuck anyone. Most are trading their looks for $. And they're used to it. Get real.
/r/askTRP30/08/20 12:24 AM
3

Their jobs are also not high statues. You're definitely not an engineer. Not even close I'd bet, which is why you spouted this bull.
/r/askTRP09/08/20 01:13 AM
0

" through a long LTR with plenty of sex that they're worthy of marriage. " That's the most stupid thing I've come across on Reddit in a long time - not surprised I found it in the TRP.
/r/askTRP04/08/20 05:14 AM
-3

If someone is in that situation, they deserve to die. Sorry, but to even think of suicide just because of "female" is pathetic to the point of being indescribable.
/r/askTRP18/07/20 10:06 PM
2

Nobody is stopping anyone. It's all about evidence. But that doesn't mean the world made in 6 days is the same scale as evolutionary biology. Religion has NO evidence backing it, science has tonnes. and it keeps building up. Baseline models rarely change. Newtonian mechanics is still valid.
/r/askTRP16/07/20 06:41 AM
2

Dude. stop. You're confusing dynamism of science with relativism. The earth is NOT flat. That's something that hasn't changed. The earth is round > the earth is a sphere and then to be more precise a spheroid. In science, you get less wrong. Doesn't mean it is a fairy tale.
/r/askTRP16/07/20 06:31 AM
0

I only checked his tone. This is a public forum, not his mom's basement. I generally stay away from commenting here because I know there's a lot of insecure peeps around here. Keep out of this as you have nothing to do with it.
/r/askTRP27/06/20 06:33 PM
0

You gotta check your tone there fella. "Great fucking living" Yes for a turd like you with a low bar, sure. Keep it to yourself.
/r/askTRP27/06/20 02:07 PM
2

That's a bit too personal to ask, and that too on a public forum (IMO). I suggest you look up income percentiles in the United States. Any income above $100K is considered decent, and is probably the top 14% in the nation. $200K+ is where you're considered to be doing reallly good, and $500K is godly. (Not going into seven figures, as that's probably the top 0.1%).
/r/askTRP27/06/20 06:38 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter