TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Exiili Archive

View 0 posts and 26 comments by Exiili on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Well. this is a quick way to make sure men never discuss their feelings or thoughts. I'm looking forward to the next edition where she's crying about how her new boyfriend is emotionally distant.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/08/21 03:13 AM
4

And this surprised no one. What is weird for me is that the technology exists now. We can produce this, it's not even hard. But for some reason no one seems to care? Pharmaceutical companies are willingly letting millions upon millions of profit go untapped. Why is that?
/r/MensRights23/06/15 05:17 PM
1

I miss the times when the internet wasn't serious business. While dark in essence, he does have the point. No one is safe, everyone gets abuse, deal with it. If you don't like it then ban the internet, because that is what you must do to be safe from seeing all the abuse.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 04:47 PM
–

Can you tell me when it's ok to have sex with a woman if they're treated as children in courts? Wouldn't that make me a pedophile no matter what I do?
/r/MensRights03/06/15 01:53 PM
–

I don't know how this is relevant. It's statistics, men drive more. Predominantly all truck drivers, garbage drivers, even taxi drivers are men. So wouldn't it make sense that if not only do you drive to work, but your work is driving around, you would get pulled for a breathalyzer more? the point that is hidden somewhere between the second and third paragraph is that drunk driving is about 8% in both sexes.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 12:54 PM
11

I will be angry until the day I die Tumblr users in a nutshell.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 04:13 PM
1

Point taken. It's just me not being a non-native English speaker, they both translate to quite the same thing. So I've never bothered with the nuances. I just automatically understood them as the same.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 09:07 PM
–

Because people think they must. You can't ignore a rowdy backlash when you try to market something, it's been an accepted fact for decades now. Though internet is teenzy weenzy different in a way that it hates everything, enjoys outrages and never ever changes the first kneejerk opinion. It'll take about 20-30 years for the marketing and pr people to switch to a younger generation that had to live with this shit, so as not to care so much about anonymous internet assholes that are not going to b…
/r/MensRights08/05/15 08:37 PM
–

How is it different? People don't use latin anymore for anything else than to appear smart when pointing out the differences between two families of crawfish and medical eye operations.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 08:03 PM
–

Of course, she has the right of an artistic expression. Though the lawsuit doesn't touch her at the least. She isn't a party so every rough std ridden lie can be focused. And when Nungesser wins the suit against the university, he can continue on with a court order that he was right. Then there is only tears she can do about the perjury. I applaud him. He's much smarter than me, I would've tried to get a defamation sue to stick. But he's going all the way. Edit: it's not a criminal suit against …
/r/MensRights26/04/15 08:20 PM
–

You're right. Also I can't believe I spend like 20 minutes looking at forensic hair DNA analysis studies only to find out that I am an asshole in the end.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 06:20 PM
–

Am I just an asshole for thinking there is DNA on the hair and it would be infinitely more valid to use that as the evidence instead of "these 2 hairs seem to look the same." Defenders should jump up on their game and take out their own ball hair and the arm hair of a random guy on the street and present it as evidence. Then when it's accepted, because well it's some curly black hair, looks the same to me. Tell where the evidence came from and how flimsy the prosecution's case is if it only rest…
/r/MensRights20/04/15 05:19 PM
1

The thing is that video is about an year old, and there was a multitude of videos before it. I can see how he just wanted to gloss past things and say "all these things are debunked in my previous 10 videos, so this is retarded." He did caught a lot of flak for it though, nowadays he methodically provides sources for the information he uses and provides counterarguments mostly, even to the most inane things. Some still are just in wtf territory and should be reacted as such. I guess I want you t…
/r/MensRights17/04/15 10:46 PM
7

This just in: British upper class white woman defends muslim child rape gangs. Because it's the politically correct thing to do.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 10:24 PM
–

I'm not a UK resident so I don't know all the nuances. But did not your parliament have a huge scandal of pedophile rings consistent of politicians who were protecting eachothers asses just a while ago?
/r/MensRights17/04/15 09:19 PM
3

Hahaha. The biggest category even in mtgow forums is about women. Ten times more than finances, 25 times more than hobbies.
/r/MGTOW14/04/15 07:33 PM
7

Bottling it all up will just kill you, likewise letting it all go will destroy your relationships. Obviously the only choice is to get a qualified psychologist or a psychiatrist and pay them to listen to you. I say qualified, because they need to have a MD. They need to have seen some shit. So they do not just blow you off, like "psychotherapists" or other therapists can.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 07:14 PM
8

Why would they care? I though men were obsolete.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 04:05 PM
–

It's not satire, it's scary. There is like ~600 of these videos over two years in the channel. Most of them with hardly any views at all. It's like watching documented insanity play out in slow motion: Edit: I was gonna link something, but fuck giving this person any more attention.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 03:34 PM
3

It's a 10-hour-old throwaway account with this as the only post. The only explanation is that the person wants to start some shit.
/r/MGTOW23/03/15 02:55 AM
3

Mods are asleep. It will not be there tomorrow.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 12:39 AM
–

What is Neo-conservatism? Isn't that an oxymoron?
/r/MensRights26/02/15 11:01 PM
2

I agree if with "fighting" you mean reporting the biased edits to the mods in order to ban the people who would plague the greatest online intellectual collective with propaganda. It's not hardly the first time this has happened, just google feminist wikipedia Edit-A-Thon.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 08:49 PM
3

You are mistaken. "To distill down Gamergate, it is essentially female cultural imperialism (in the form of SJW's) invading a male space." This has never been the issue. The issue is corruption inside gaming journalism and gaming publishers in general. It doesn't matter what the fuck Anita Sarkeesian says about video games. Whatever she screams, is of no consequence, as the games she mutilates are boring and will not be bought anyway. We have 2 decades of marketing information on what kind of ga…
/r/MensRights21/12/14 12:26 AM
–

Until you realize the correct answer to the question was "false."
/r/MensRights19/08/14 11:08 AM
–

If you see the posting history, it's not your typical trollop here. It's a genuine person who thinks that that feminism and men's right's movements are not at all intertwined. I agree in the slight that all the #twitterwars is not really relevant. But it's all politics in the end. To op: I would go on a tangent on how the movements are bound together. But this person summarizes my troughs pretty well and adds in quite a lot of things I didn't even consider. Instead of stealing his argument, I'll…
/r/MensRights18/08/14 02:50 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter