TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Existing-Bug-7910 Archive

View 0 posts and 193 comments by Existing-Bug-7910 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

If a husband can’t handle his fair share of household responsibilities or worse, expects his wife to take care of him he’s not a partner, he’s another child. That kind of incompetence is deeply unattractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 01:42 PM
–

Most guys who follow red pill only do so because they aren’t successful with women. If women reject them, that means those women don’t want their attention anyway. Self-improvement is always a good thing but red pill ideology twists it. Instead of taking responsibility, it blames women, paints men as victims, and hides behind “unchangeable natural rules” to escape accountability. That’s selfish Red pill frames women as “evil” because they don’t appreciate men or sleep with them out of pity. thin…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 06:55 PM
3

That makes it even more disgusting. If we go by that logic, “biology” turns men into slaves desperate to fuck anything that moves, incapable of control, and without standards. that’s embarrassing. do you realize this view hurts men too? Some men behave that way, but plenty of men have standards, self-control, and don’t even want sex sometimes. Reducing all men to mindless animals is just as insulting to them as it is to women. It also fuels the dangerous idea that “men always want sex,” which is…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/25 09:17 AM
0

Both women and men deserve blame when they cheat in relationships not exclusive women. there’s no universal rule for what counts as “a lot.” It’s a subjective feeling. How many is too many? Does the number magically change with age? Are some men considered “dirtier” than others? What about cases of abuse? Do I have to live in fear that if I leave a relationship, I’ll be judged for it? It sounds less like a real standard and more like a made-up scoring system designed to control women’s behavior.…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/25 09:01 AM
2

Means it’s just biased gender nonsense. If we assume women can “easily” get sex from random men and want that(they don’t) the missing piece is that ability only exists because so many men are desperate and have no standards. Isn’t it actually disgusting to realize that some men will sleep with anything if given the chance?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/25 08:39 AM
5

The “best” way for a woman to protect her so-called “value” is to stay abstinent. Every encounter carries the risk of being devalued because there’s no way to know if a man has good intentions or if the relationship will last. So why is it that if a woman lets a man enjoy that experience, she is considered “dirty”? By that logic, shouldn’t the man be the one labeled dirty?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/25 08:09 AM
5

Sounds like men get jealous of women’s capabilities and try to tear them down with shame. If effort is the measure for judgment, does that mean attractive men deserve to be shamed too?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/25 07:51 AM
11

Statistics show otherwise single, child-free women are actually the happiest group compared to married women. If a husband dies, women are far less likely to remarry, while men tend to move on quickly. Nowadays, women are more educated and often hold higher-paying jobs. Many men struggle to understand that women can be happy without a relationship because they can’t. That’s the reasons it’s male (not female) loneliness epidemic. Because mens life and mental health dependent on romantic relations…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/25 05:18 AM
20

No one is forced to settle. Men and woman can choose to stay single if they can’t find the right match for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/25 04:56 AM
27

What’s missing here is that relationships aren’t mandatory anymore. Women don’t need to lower their standards they stay single, maintaining friendships, careers, and a life that doesn’t revolve around men. It’s not bitterness, it’s personal peace. Many women know it’s better to be happily single than stuck in a miserable relationship. So by your own theory, 80% of men are just leftovers because women simply prefer being single over them
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/25 04:27 AM
3

Since more men are active on dating apps, it’s obvious that women message first less often than men. But if you’re doing a stochastic analysis on studies with unequal group sizes, comparing absolute numbers against each other isn’t representative.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 12:05 PM
2

They do, compare to men, woman message men they consider as least attractive way more ​ <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 11:30 AM
6

Read the whole study. Cherry-picking or ripping studies apart just to fit them into your personal worldview doesn’t make your point valid. It only leads to delusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 10:30 AM
6

Finding 20% of all men attractive actually sounds really high to me. The study doesn’t even show which men those women considered attractive they could all have chosen different ones based on their individual taste. So the study is no proof at all that women only go for the same 20% of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 10:24 AM
6

The graphic without the full study means nothing. Yes, it’s true that women find fewer men physically attractive, but when it comes to matches and actual relationships, women value many other things beyond looks much more than men do. Men mostly only value looks
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 10:17 AM
3

O get that you’re saying you don’t discriminate and just “watch out,” but the problem is that this mindset itself reinforces the stereotype. When men date younger women, people rarely question their mental health it’s just seen as normal. When women do the same, suddenly it gets pathologized as “not neurotypical.” That double standard doesn’t reflect reality, it reflects how society judges men and women differently for the same choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 01:47 AM
2

Your sad believe is your problem. If men dating younger women is considered normal, then women dating younger men should be too. Attraction doesn’t suddenly become a disorder just because the genders are reversed. What’s actually “not normal” is the way society applies two different standards depending on whether it’s a man or a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 01:29 AM
2

What nonsense. Woman are sexual beings. Men are just incapable to accept that younger men are physical more attractive for woman then older men.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 12:35 AM
3

What makes you believe that it’s different for woman? Woman who date younger men wants them for better looks as well. Simple
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 12:06 AM
17

Women’s special treatment was being kept at home because they were seen as subhuman and incapable of living independently, which was anything but a privilege. In the US they were legally considered property, first owned by their fathers and then by their husbands, and confined to the home to serve. Husbands were legally allowed to beat their wives for discipline and could not be prosecuted for raping them. A married woman’s possessions automatically belonged to her husband. In fact, until the Eq…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 08:45 AM
3

Not everyone gets their dream life. However you can work toward a better one. That doesn’t just mean hustling at work, it includes personal growth, friendships, and fulfillment. Dropping out before you even try, just because there’s no guarantee, isn’t realism it’s refusing accountability
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 08:57 PM
12

totally sane, all women just want to enslave men. Puzzle solved. Because obviously it’s too crazy to believe they just want the basic freedom to make their own dating choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 12:07 PM
7

Honestly, that just sounds really sad. No one but you is responsible for your life. Expecting relationships to carry that weight for you isn’t just unfair. It’s a way to avoid accountability
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 11:47 AM
10

I don’t get it either, and I’d genuinely love to hear some honest insight from men. For me, having a good standard of living doesn’t depend on someone else. I value myself, which means I’m willing to put in the effort to build a life I actually enjoy. You can find fulfilment in so many ways. relationship can be a great addition, but it’s not necessary. Honestly, it sounds pretty depressing if your sense of self-worth depends on whether or not you have a partner
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 11:08 AM
4

And? Relationships and marriage aren’t a necessity anymore, so many women would rather stay single than settle for less. Women can make their own decisions. They go after the guys they actually want based on their personal preferences.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/25 02:27 PM
19

Sins aren’t real. They’re a tool to control societies rules enforced through shame. If your religion demands a certain lifestyle, that’s your deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/25 02:12 PM
14

Sins?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/25 02:03 PM
4

People aren’t products assigning “value” to them is toxic nonsense. What makes someone a good partner depends on compatibility, not some imaginary ranking system or received approaches. Calling others “low value” usually says more about someone’s own insecurity and dating frustrations than it does about the person they’re insulting.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 12:32 PM
5

Everyone has personal preferences when it comes to dating totally normal. What makes someone a ‘high’ or ‘low’ quality partner is subjective. Men are free to exclude women with certain traits, and women can do the exact same. Easy. What really screams bitterness is the urge to insult and devalue women you’re not even attracted to. What’s the point? Is it rejection if no one asked?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 12:03 PM
0

Fr, sharing a home with my ex-boyfriend was exhausting. The emotional labor, the constant reminders to do basic things, totally nerve wracking . Since moving in with two of my (female) friends, life has been a completely different experience. We divide household tasks without drama, support each other emotionally, communicate clearly, and actually respect each other’s space. it feels like home for the first time.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 09:19 AM
9

Babe more has changed since the 1950s than just women getting rights. Crazy some people genuinely believe there’s one correct way to live: there isn’t. Happiness isn’t one-size-fits-all. Just because the traditional model worked for some doesn’t mean it works for everyone. Let people live their lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 03:02 PM
12

And statistically, single women without children are the happiest demographic.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 02:30 PM
11

People are free to date whoever they want. Nothing is stopping men from dating women who willingly embrace traditional roles. Idk why you’re so obsessed with forcing rigid gender roles. Go build your ideal 1950s family if you find a willing partner. But in a free society, women are allowed to prioritize their own happiness. And the truth is: traditional dynamics come at women’s expense.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 01:35 PM
–

Yeah, save some women for the rest of the guys, will you?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 02:54 PM
–

Your post drips with misogyny and hate. You must be such a catch then
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 02:48 PM
–

Is this some weird attempt to guilt women into dating men they’re not attracted to? Being “less attractive” doesn’t automatically make someone kind, respectful, or emotionally safe. Ugly men aren’t saints by default just like attractive ones aren’t automatically toxic. Abusive behavior isn’t about looks it’s about character.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 02:32 PM
6

Wild take, but in a mature relationship, boundaries and expectations like waiting for sex until marriage, should be discussed openly. If that was agreed on from the start, then cheating is a clear betrayal. Me are not entitled to sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 06:14 AM
9

You’d be surprised how attractive it is when a man is emotionally stable, confident in his masculinity, and unafraid to play with femininity. Is a man in high heels really that controversial for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 08:34 AM
6

Some men are under the illusion that just existing should be enough. It’s not. Healthy relationships require both partners to be stable and independent. Expect men do their fair share shouldn’t be this controversial. Wanting emotional support, equality, and shared responsibility isn’t “transactional” it’s the foundation of real partnership. What’s truly transactional is the traditional setup: women doing unpaid labor while relying on men who hold all the power. That’s not romance it’s control.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 08:23 AM
1

Your so-called “experiences” aren’t objective. You’re not describing actual situations or conflicts you’re just listing insults and accusing women of character weaknesses. This kind of internalized generalization is harmful. It blurs your perception of reality and leads to overreaction and unfair judgment.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 08:03 AM
11

decide for yourself what you value in a partner. If you choose not to care, great for you. It’s just not a flex.. And yes, women have other values. We notice effort. We care. If a man could walk in heels and had a collection, I’d be impressed. I’d compliment his skill, not mock it. That’s the difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 07:50 AM
9

There’s no issue here. You falsely assume its obligated to settle. Everyone has the right to decide what they value in a partner. Men can prefer traditional dynamics and women are just as free to say no. Likewise, women set their own standards. Relationships today aren’t about survival anymore, so no one is forced into something that makes them miserable. And honestly, a happy single life often looks a lot more appealing than settling.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 07:37 AM
13

Successful, intelligent women, like men, can have flaws that affect relationships. That’s just being human. Ideally, both partners take responsibility, reflect, and grow. But if you’re not intimidated by successful women, why spend so much time trying to tear them down? You made sweeping generalizations, describe them controlling, hysterical, egotistical, which just reinforces tired stereotypes about “emotional” women. Meanwhile, successful men are treated as flawless by default. Their ambition …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 07:21 AM
5

A privilege is an advantage granted to a select group over others. In my country, equality is a fundamental principle of our constitution: All people are equal before the law. If women’s rights were just “privileges,” that would imply men are excluded from equality which obviously isn’t the case. There’s no military draft here. Men and women can both choose to volunteer. Shared maternity leave for both parents v
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 05:01 AM
3

The level of male delusion never fails to be funny. Instead of growing up and taking responsibility for their own future, some men demand women to fix them, nurture them like babies
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 04:42 AM
18

So if I understand you right, women “benefit” from relationships when they’re dependent on men with traditional rales. Men prefer women who rely on them. Educated women gain too much confidence, so they’re “useless”? If she still wants to date She’s supposed to serve his needs, run the household, and bend to his wishes and in return he “provides” (barely doable with modern costs) and “protects” her… from what? Sounds like a bleak deal. No wonder more women choose to stay single, invest in themse…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 01:30 AM
7

Men need to accept that they aren’t entitled to women’s bodies or labor. A woman’s worth isn’t defined by how much she’s willing to sacrifice for a man’s comfort or pleasure. Having values means respecting yourself knowing you deserve decent treatment and that your body is yours alone to decide over.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 12:54 AM
24

Relationships are supposed to enrich both lives — not just his. Why should a woman date a man who mocks or dismisses her accomplishments? What’s the payoff for her effort, strength, or support if he can’t even show basic respect for what she’s achieved? If he doesn’t value her, why should she invest in him?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 12:27 AM
34

Women with degrees and promotions have every right to be proud of themselves. If you truly weren’t intimidated, you wouldn’t feel the need to downplay or mock their achievements. Most women aren’t looking for a “provider” they’re looking for a partner who pulls their weight. Someone who contributes emotionally, domestically, and professionally. That’s what equal partnership looks like. If that’s not your thing, fine. Date someone who prefers traditional roles. But don’t act like ambitious women …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 11:54 PM
3

What exactly makes you so sure about this supposed power imbalance? Is it comforting to imagine women as weaker? That you have control over them because if you wanted you could hurt them. Men consistently overestimate themselves — 9% genuinely believe they could take on a gorilla or an elephant. So maybe let’s dial back the tough guy fantasies.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 11:04 PM
3

Ah, thanks for the explanation! ☺️ So it wasn’t really men overthrowing society — it was conservative elites, terrified of losing influence, who manipulated both men and women into supporting a religious crackdown. These restrictions were only maintained through brutal force and violence. And even today, there are still women and men resisting them. I’m curious if this is supposed to be a threat.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 10:43 PM
1

Sure, men are on average physically stronger — but that doesn’t mean women would just submit without a fight. Even without male support, women would resist, and the cost would be bloody. The power imbalance isn’t as one-sided as some men like to pretend.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 10:16 PM
0

1950s housewife, what a sad little fantasy. When you’re done daydreaming about your imaginary submissive wife, maybe take some accountability for your own social life instead of demanding woman to fix your life.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 10:02 PM
58

Your entire post proves the point. Intelligent, independent, and successful women directly challenge what some men want women to be submissive, domestic, soft-spoken caregivers. These women live on their own terms, pursue their interests, and don’t rely on male approval. That loss of control is what really intimidates them. Choosing a partner who respects her strength is a reflection of self-respect. Rejecting disagreeing men and dismiss their opinions. These women are living proof that “natural…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 09:34 PM
6

Today’s earth state is nothing to be proud of. Men’s lack of emotional regulation and fragile egos have played a massive role in the current state of our planet. A thoughtful, emotionally grounded leader would seek constructive solutions to build peace, cooperation, and a better life for everyone. Instead, history shows a pattern: anger, wounded pride, and power trips. Instead of collaboration, we got war. Instead of equity, we got exploitative systems. Instead of sustainable progress, we got ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 08:50 PM
5

What kind of “privilege” is it if women’s basic human rights dependence on the mercy of men? Are we supposed to praise men, serve them gratefully, and cater to their needs just so they continue to “allow” us rights? Women have rights today not because men were generous, but because women organized, fought relentlessly, built economic power, and eventually gained legal recognition. Yes, with the support of some men. But those rights were earned, not gifted. let’s be clear: modern women don’t need…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 08:33 PM
8

Cleaning and handling domestic responsibilities is part of being a functional adult. When men do their fair share in a relationship, they’re not doing anything extraordinary they’re meeting the bare minimum. A relationship that lacks emotional, romantic, and physical intimacy isn’t “good”. Those elements aren’t bonuses; they’re what separate a partner from a housemate.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 06:49 PM
5

The definition of a joke is a thing that someone says to cause amusement or laughter, especially a story with a funny punchline. It would love to hear which part of rape fits into this description.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 08:45 PM
–

Who hurt you?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 06:23 PM
–

Engaging in a high-risk lifestyle does not nullify a person’s right to bodily autonomy. No one becomes open to violation simply by virtue of their choices. The nature of the violence — and its psychological impact — remains consistent, regardless of the victim’s background. Accountability lies solely with the perpetrator because obviously he is the one committed it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 09:25 AM
0

Consent isn’t a philosophical concept. If you struggle to read body language or understand consent, reduce the risk: talk to your partner before anything starts. Especially if you’re into BDSM or other kinks, it’s essential to clearly discuss expectations, limits, and boundaries. It requires trust and a safe dynamic. If someone still makes accusations, having clear communication and consent can help prove you acted responsibly. Trust the police and courts to sort it out — that’s their job.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 06:47 PM
5

Prostitutes, porn stars, or simply sexually active women are just as capable of being victims of sexual violence. Their profession or lifestyle is not a blanket consent for abuse. In fact, it significantly increases their risk of becoming victims — not the opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 06:32 PM
1

. If he’s found guilty, he should face consequences, including jail time. But if she’s telling the truth, she’s a real victim. Any money she receives is compensation for her trauma, not “extorted wealth.” it’s justifies. In my country it’s normal that victim of physical violence receive a compensation. Dismissing her pain only invalidates her experience and encourages victim-blaming.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 06:09 PM
-2

Influence, reach, physical strength, support, and credibility give him an advantage. He knows he can exploit the situation. Yet, despite what he’s done, people (mostly men) are quick to defend him, attack the accuser, and throw insults at her. This isn’t about justice. Just look at this sub—people have already prejudged her, ignoring the story and ignore that the trial is not even over. All That’s decrease her credibility and can influence the lawsuit. Which I think is really sad, she is still a…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 05:34 PM
5

No, Her age gave her the ability to give consent- if she wanted to. In this case we have no evidence that she agreed to all that. Her being over 18 is no grand consent.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 05:16 PM
-1

Everyone, regardless of gender, has the right to withdraw consent at any time. If that happens, sexual activity must immediately stop. This is a fundamental right for both men and women. It’s essential to create a sexual environment where all parties feel safe and respected. A single “yes” from the past is no all time access permission.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 05:00 PM
3

Insulting her doesn’t change the fact that she’s a young girl. According to your conclusion, she somehow outsmarted the sad, desperate old nfl celebrity. That narrative doesn’t add up.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 04:47 PM
-3

No one’s suggesting she isn’t accountable for her actions. But we can’t overlook the massive power imbalance between them. He holds all the cards, and that creates a situation where he could easily exploit his position. Another key point is consent. There’s no solid evidence that she gave her consent to everything that happened. His legal team may have texts showing mutual interest, but those messages don’t give him a free pass to act however he pleases. It’s possible she consented to sex in the…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 04:35 PM
2

On one side, we have a former NFL player with money, influence, and power — on the other, a young girl with none of that. She ignores the massive power imbalance, risks everything, and concocts an evil plan?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 04:17 PM
3

What happened to “innocent until proven guilty”? Thought this was highly important in these type of cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 04:01 PM
1

sounds more like paranoia tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/25 08:46 PM
-1

Of course, a woman’s most important purpose in life is to confuse some guys and mess up their lives. But women don’t center men enough to put that much effort into Such an vendetta
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/25 08:31 PM
0

Men have the right to complain as much as they like; maybe they’ll even influence some women to change their minds. I understand the frustration, but you can’t force people into relationships they don’t want. However, women also have the right to their own dating preferences and expect to have the same values. If these preferences exclude a lot of men, they need to be okay with the possibility of never finding someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/25 07:27 PM
2

Im With you. OP wanted examples of how rp generalize women, painting a negative image. I know those are false claims made by the Red Pill communit
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/25 06:54 PM
0

It’s impressive how some men are convinced they’re the decent, good guys who are the poor victims of women’s selection, as if they’re being denied relationships they somehow “deserve.” The truth is, it’s not up to men to decide what women’s expectations are. Attraction is complex and personal, and it’s not something that can be controlled or owed to anyone. But if you always get left out being considered as a dating option, it’s fair to assume that the problem lies in you.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/25 06:44 PM
-1

It’s impressive how some men convince themselves they’re “one of the good guys,” as if being nice should earn them a reward. Women often ignore guys they’re not attracted to, or if something about their vibe feels off, even if the guy thinks he’s doing everything right. It’s not always personal sometimes it’s just a gut feeling or simply a lack of connection.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/25 06:23 PM
4

Hypergamy Women’s value loss with age, used as justification to treat them horribly Accusing all women of character flaws like: Gold diggers Users Emotional & manipulative Never satisfied or loyal Believing women secretly want dominant men “Nice guys” are doomed Most is based on a twisted interpretation of evolutionary psychology and biology in combination with negative experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/25 06:04 PM
0

Wording makes all the difference. When people use positive-sounding words like “praise” or “attention” to describe men harassing random women, it completely downplays how problematic that behavior actually is. It shifts the focus away from the discomfort or violation women experience and tries to reframe it as something flattering — when it’s really not.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/25 05:45 PM
14

If the Red Pill stuff were just about self-improvement — like increasing your quality of life and becoming someone others genuinely want as a partner — fine. But the problem is all those misogynistic generalisation’s about women’s “true” nature. That’s where it turns toxic. It pushes guys to feel resentment toward women, and that often turns into outright hate. And with such a negative view of women, having a healthy, fulfilling relationship becomes almost impossible.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/25 05:36 PM
1

You really think most guys already meet those expectations? There’s actually a pretty big gap between how men and women define what a “decent guy” is. That gap could exist because some men tend to overestimate their value or because women are just more selective. Probably a bit of both. When you combine that with the fact that a lot of men rely almost entirely on romantic relationships for emotional support, it’s no surprise so many are struggling with loneliness.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/25 03:51 PM
5

Thinking your attraction to some random woman gives you the right to shower her with “attention” and “praise” is exactly the problem, you demand access her. In that moment, you’re invading her personal space because that interaction is one-sided and unwanted. Why should she appreciate it? You can’t say this kind of attention has lost meaning when it never had any to begin with. Honestly, if men stopped with this constant “praising” of strangers, women’s opinions of men might actually improve bec…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/25 03:12 PM
16

Women getting “attention” from strangers — whether in real life or on social media — has never been seen as male validation or a compliment. It was worthless from the start. There’s no reason to appreciate that kind of “praise” when it’s really just men overstepping boundaries, invading personal space, or straight-up harassment. Finding someone attractive doesn’t give you the right to access her body or her time.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/25 02:29 PM
7

I can’t believe some men write stuff like this and then act surprised when no one wants to date them. They cling to redpill nonsense because it shifts the blame onto women’s “unrealistic” standards — when in reality, most women just want a decent guy who can take care of himself and treats them like a human being. That’s really not too much to ask from the average man.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/25 12:08 PM
3

I genuinely like who I am. I value most in life is the freedom to build a life based on our own desires. Wanting a world where women can freely choose relationships and families isn’t hate — and it’s definitely not egocentric. Your delusion is your own problem. Believing you have some “higher purpose” doesn’t mean you get to demand a family.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/25 11:05 AM
6

It’s pure ego to think you’re entitled to sex like it’s some kind of reward, and expect women to fuck with guys they’re not even attracted to. If you willingly choose a dangerous job, that’s on you — your own dumb choice, not society’s fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/25 10:33 AM
2

I wouldn’t count on their help. Men can try to include women in their solution plans, but that doesn’t mean women are obligated to play along. The sheer amount of energy men put into avoiding accountability is astonishing. Imagine if they used that effort to actually improve themselves or support each other instead of demanding that others fix their problems for them. You’d think it would be common sense something we all learn in childhood that the only person truly responsible for solving our p…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 03:10 PM
1

Women are not responsible for taking care of a man’s unfulfilled life. In the past, social norms and laws pressured women into marriage. Thankfully, feminism and the empowerment of equal rights have given women the ability to choose partners based on their standards or even reject dating altogether. The male loneliness epidemic is the result of women choosing better partners and recognizing that most men aren’t suitable. While women have a significant impact on the issue, it’s not their responsi…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 11:05 AM
2

I really don’t get where the struggle is. It’s basic logic if you work on yourself (character, education, appearance, etc.), your chances of success improve. Being “average” doesn’t mean everything; people have different preferences, and finding someone who’s into you isn’t some impossible mission. What actually matters for building real connections is character. If you’re bitter, aggressive, or seething with resentment toward women or minorities, then yeah, your chances are basically nonexisten…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 06:46 AM
2

All this nonsense just to avoid taking responsibility. Everyone else is to blame for men’s unsuccessful lives, as if their situation is completely out of their control and others are obligated to fix it for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 03:59 AM
2

I still don’t understand why men expect women to solve their problems and “save” them in the first place. Don’t know what’s the origin of men being delusional. From a young age, we learn that only we can help ourselves. That’s life.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 02:03 AM
1

Imagine blaming your own loneliness on the opposite gender for not taking care of you. It’s time to take responsibility for your emotional well-being. Women are done plying mommy for men-children. Throwing tantrums -crying, whining, and insulting Woman won’t make them care again.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 01:37 AM
5

That should have been the solution from the start. Why this weird fixation on women being solutions? If they don’t care about men’s issues, why desperate rely on them? Men supporting each other shouldn’t feel like a punishment, yet some act as if it’s the last, most unpleasant option left.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 01:16 AM
4

Men need to start taking responsibility for their own issues and finding solutions instead of just complaining that women don’t care. Men are fully capable of building meaningful relationships and social support networks with other men. No one is stopping you guys from supporting each other or even from fucking each other, if that’s what you need.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 01:03 AM
5

right, not worth it. Most men’s expectations in women’s offer of help or provide care often translate to the idea that women should lower their standards and sleep with men they’re not attracted to out of pity. No thanks, lol. Not caring about other people’s opinions is great, but that alone won’t solve male loneliness.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 12:48 AM
–

Looks have no impact on someone’s quality as a partner character does. Being handsome doesn’t automatically make someone arrogant or mean they use their appearance as an excuse to avoid personal growth. Likewise, being unattractive doesn’t guarantee that someone will develop positive character traits. In fact, unattractive people can become bitter, hateful, and jealous due to frequent rejection. In the end, both attractive and unattractive people are capable of playing or hurting you. If that ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 12:28 AM
2

I’m sorry, that’s just sad…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 09:59 PM
9

That’s understandable. It’s painful to be rejected without even having a chance in the first place. However, for women, giving a lot of guys chances can be time-consuming, emotionally draining, and even dangerous. It also goes against the desire for women to be more honest. When they give guys a chance based on a tiny possibility of a spark, it misleads the guys. It creates false hope, only to crush them harder later. Wouldn’t an honest rejection from the start be more helpful and avoid unnecess…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 09:53 PM
12

I agree that many women should acknowledge men’s issues more. They can empathize with the struggles men face in meeting dating expectations. They could listen and, most importantly, not acting dismissive when men express their problems. But here’s the thing having and showing empathy doesn’t mean lowering their standards. Recognizing their struggles doesn’t mean women are obligated to give lonely guys a chance out of pity. Both men and women have the right to set personal dating standards and sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 09:19 PM
-1

No one is stopping you. :) Reddit just isn’t the right space for it, so you’ll have to deal with some backlash. I genuinely support the idea of men creating self-help groups. I can imagine that would really help them cope with lonelinesses, fighting the war together.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 09:00 PM
8

In your comment, you complain way too much about women refusing to take responsibility for men’s loneliness. War? Theatrical dramatic. Who exactly are you fighting against?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 08:16 PM
12

What should woman, according to you, do to help men regarding the loneliness epidemic?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 07:48 PM
–

aaaaand that’s supposed to be a good thing? I don’t see the benefit of staying in toxic, unhappy relationships. No amount of so-called stability is worth desperately clinging to something that’s already failed. Nothing good can come from that foundation.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 06:52 PM
–

lol- the world will keep turning even if humans go extinct. No need to be dramatic. Men’s decreased dating success won’t make them magically disappear or trigger the apocalypse.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 06:41 PM
–

It simply means she prioritizes herself—which is a good thing. Ending a relationship isn’t gender-biased; men leave for personal reasons just as women do. These reasons are deeply individual, and people who aren’t part of the relationship can’t accurately judge whether two people are compatible. That’s beyond our ability. Not sure why you think you’re in a position to judge.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 03:56 PM
-1

The victim mentality here is really strong. Comparing the systemic oppression of Black people to an introverted guy’s lack of dating success is next-level mental gymnastics lol Fairness is for children. Working on ourselves should be about personal growth becoming better people not a transaction for dating success. Self-improvement doesn’t automatically deserve a reward. Life isn’t fair, and nothing is ever guaranteed. There’s no magic threshold that, once reached, guarantees a relationship. Wea…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 01:17 PM
1

If you did these activities with her, they weren’t solo
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 12:05 PM
2

Everyone has their own limits, and it’s not up to someone else to judge them. Attending social events can be draining, but it can also bring joy if you allow yourself to enjoy the experience. Completely rejecting social interactions and staying at home all the time, however, could be considered a sign of mental health issues for many reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 11:59 AM
–

It’s a misconception that ending relationships needs to have a valid reason. That’s BS they don’t need one. people just realize they’re not compatible anymore, and that’s enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 11:52 AM
1

Being introverted doesn’t mean you’re incapable of leaving the house or attending social events. You don’t need to be an extrovert to enjoy gatherings from time to time. The key difference is that engaging in these environments takes a lot of energy for introverts, but it can still be worth it on occasion. Introverts are not limited to indoor,they can participate in social events, though they may need time to recharge afterward.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 11:46 AM
0

Nobody is forced into isolation. Working on yourself is always an option. Choosing isolation is just an easy way to deny responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 11:00 AM
-3

Here’s the problem: introverted guys usually don’t want to date introverted girls. It’s often the opposite. Men tend to rely on the woman’s social circle. They dream of the extroverted girl who pulls them out of their shell, introduces them to new friend groups, and teaches them social skills. An introverted guy dating an introverted girl would likely lead to isolation and misery.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 10:41 AM
2

The world doesn’t need to “work”. Just because I acknowledge some good actions from men doesn’t mean I feel the need to sleep with them or they deserve them. We’re simply discussing whether romantic relationships are necessary for a fulfilling life it’s not about questioning their existence. Why would half the population suddenly disappear? Men are perfectly capable of living on their own and finding their own purpose.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 08:48 AM
0

What I see most with these men is that they’re like toddlers. They want a “traditional” woman but refuse to be traditional men by taking on the responsibility of financial stability. Crying about imaginary “golddiggers” They cherrypick gender roles to justify demanding a submissive wife who fulfills their desires and handles all the household chores alone but at the same time, they expect her to work and pay 50/50. Like a toddler, they want everything but refuse to give anything in return.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 08:40 AM
0

Individual happiness is everything, and everyone is responsible for their own. But if half the population’s well-being depends on oppressing the other gender, then they deserve to fail. It’s a fact that marriage and relationships benefit men but often come at the expense of women. Women tend to be much more fulfilled in life when they’re single.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 08:28 AM
3

No woman with self-respect would want to be the kind of wife you’re describing. If you insist on an equal split of assets, there’s no logical reason why a woman should be “submissive” in a relationship. If it’s just a business arrangement, what exactly does the woman gain from this setup?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 08:14 AM
0

No, statistics have proven that men rely on women for a longer, healthier, and more fulfilling life, while women don’t need men they’re actually much happier without marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 07:45 AM
4

There’s nothing wrong with a woman ending a relationship if she’s being mistreated especially when a man’s behavior has already destroyed it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 07:41 AM
–

II’d recommend having an open conversation with older women let them tell you about the so-called “good old” marriages. I don’t see your point. My government can create policies that improve my life, but having power over me doesn’t strip me of my human rights or dignity. Submissive would. I get what you’re trying to do twisting logic to justify a system where men essentially get personal servants out of desperation. Funny coming from a man, considering you’d be the privileged gender in this sce…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 11:23 PM
–

Yes :) Freedom can be challenging because it requires people to think critically, innovate, and constantly make decisions. But it’s still far better than being property. Nothing feels better than having control over your own life and choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 09:39 PM
1

His reaction to the idea of dinner dates says everything. The way someone speaks reveals their true character using dehumanizing language or immediately resorting to insults is a huge red flag. Calling random women “whores” just because they have preferences is straightup disrespectful, and that kind of behavior shouldn’t be normalized. Let’s be real, this isn’t about getting a free meal no dinner is worth putting up with that kind of attitude. Seeing every social interaction as a transaction is…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 09:24 PM
3

Some people just have awful personalities not everyone is lovable. It’s on them to accept the reality that sometimes wealth is the only thing making them attractive. relationships can function on that basis.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 07:55 PM
-1

No, this is about his choice of words. Perfect example your terms like “female,” “whores,” or calling dating an “investment” to get sex. Reducing women to commodities just because you disagree with them is absurd. Buying someone dinner doesn’t entitle you to their body. If there’s a real connection, intimacy might happen naturally, but it’s not a transaction. If a man doesn’t want to spend money on dating or doesn’t think I’m worth it, that’s his choice he has every right to his own standards. B…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 07:39 PM
5

It’s completely unnecessary to bring children into this. Girls between 13 and 18 mostly idolize celebrities in a childish way, but that doesn’t mean they’re capable of giving consent especially not to a man in his mid-40s
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 06:01 PM
3

Okay, but men reaching their prime has conditions too. Staying attractive, having a career with age takes a lot of work, no matter the gender. It’s not just about age and money. that’s a misconception a lot of guys try to sell. They think that just because they’re older, young girls will magically fall for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 05:46 PM
–

The words you’re using are seriously dehumanizing. We’re talking about girls, children, barely adults. They’re not machines producing goods. Teen pregnancies go against human biology and come with high risks of complications like preterm birth, low birth weight, and health issues for both the mother and baby. It doesn’t help it just creates problems. Just because you see a bunch of posts on Reddit talking about ‘natural’ roles doesn’t make them true. Reddit, especially this subreddit, attracts a…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 05:37 PM
–

Contraceptives only prevent unwanted pregnancies, but the natural instinct or desire for reproduction still exists, which is why women still get pregnant happy . It’s not genetic that most children in the past were accidents; people have sex for simple satisfaction. Natural roles don’t need to be forced or encouraged in the first place. Even in today’s different environment, women would still behave according to their instincts. Oppression is actually a sign that it goes against our biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 04:51 PM
-1

Great example of why high dating expectations are important for women. It’s not about money, it’s about revealing the mindset.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 04:33 PM
–

If it’s in women’s genes then fertility rates wouldn’t have dropped once oppression started to decrease. Women would work and play the traditional ‘natural’ role at home, but the opposite is happening. Instead, women are using their newfound freedom to create lives for themselves outside of those constraints.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 04:11 PM
–

So, according to these so-called theories, women are just genetically programmed to fulfill this ‘gender role’ of being submissive? Like, somehow, it’s in our DNA to play second fiddle, stay passive, and let men take control? Any attempt to break free from these outdated stereotypes is dismissed as ‘unnatural.’ And, of course, when men take advantage of these supposed ‘gene’s’ because of sexual selection, it’s the woman’s fault. Strange how these theories never fail to benefit men, while shiftin…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 03:58 PM
6

I understood your point as taking accountability for your choices and “living with the consequences”, but my apologies if I misunderstood!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 01:53 PM
4

Choosing a relationship or a job doesn’t mean you’re consenting to being mistreated. We can’t predict the outcome of every decision – only time and experience reveal how things unfold. That’s why everyone should have the freedom to change their mind and make better choices for themselves. It’s all part of learning and growing. The idea that we should accept suffering as a form of accountability is completely ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 01:38 PM
9

If you hate or oppress someone because of their gender, that’s misogyny or misandry. The posts you mentioned are from women who have suffered because of men’s harmful behavior. Their anger isn’t baseless, it’s rooted in real experiences. Sharing their stories to warn and protect other women isn’t misandry; it’s a form of self-protection and solidarity. When women start demanding to take away men’s rights then you can start complaining.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 02:41 PM
5

Typical nonsense from attention-seeking girls in their ‘I’m so different from other girls’ phase. Taking care of your appearance isn’t about low self-esteem it’s self-care, and a personal choice. Reducing women to stereotypes or assuming they’re weak just because they prioritize their looks says more about your own insecurities than anything else. It’s not about them—it’s about how you’ve been conditioned to see them. Throwing insults or tearing other women down based on your biases or some miso…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/24 10:06 PM
7

If someone’s gender was your main reason for voting against them, that’s sexist. A choice based on political or moral values isn’t it’s your personal decision, and that’s fine. Everyone has the right to make their own choice based on what they believe in, and those beliefs aren’t universal. But if you start insulting or threatening your political opponent because of their gender, that’s sexist again no matter pf your personal reasons
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/24 02:23 PM
-1

An equal relationship doesn’t mean splitting every bill 50/50. To me, it means that both partners contribute based on what they can at the time. Sometimes that means he pays for the date, and next time I pay. Or if I’m earning more, I’m totally happy to cover more of the costs. I think it shows bad character in a relationship if someone insists on splitting everything all the time. Life doesn’t work like that it’s unrealistic. Relationships should be about supporting each other, not keeping scor…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/24 02:04 PM
0

Victims of a crime, like rape, are excluded from child support because there was no consent involved. These cases are deeply painful, and it’s our responsibility as a society to provide support and stability for those affected. But this has nothing to do with holding consenting adults accountable. When two people willingly create a child, both are responsible for providing for its needs, no excuses.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 10:21 PM
1

Rape is a criminal act, and no one in their right mind would demand child support from the victim. Let’s be clear—girls are raped too. Comparing victims based on gender is not only wrong but deeply sick. Using their pain to push an agenda is unacceptable. But when two consenting adults choose to have sex and create a new life, both are equally responsible for providing for that child. There’s no excuse for trying to dodge that responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 09:58 PM
1

No, men don’t get to make that decision—why should they? Women carry the full risk, whether it’s pregnancy or abortion, both of which can lead to major health complications. If men want to avoid child support, they have options: don’t have sex, use condoms, or get a vasectomy. But refusing to take responsibility after the child is born and denying a child their basic needs is completely unacceptable. Responsibility doesn’t disappear just because it’s inconvenient. Especially when men face no con…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 09:22 PM
2

An agreement like this is total BS. It’s your child, your responsibility so own up to your actions. It’s insane to think men can dodge all accountability yet still demand everything. Child support exists to secure the child’s basic needs. It’s not about the mother, and it’s definitely not up to her to “deny” the child the money they’re entitled to. Responsibility isn’t optional.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 08:39 PM
1

If we know the reason and If problem-solving is supposed to be in men’s nature, then improving their lives should be easy, right? That said, it’s clear they don’t regulate emotions by default—it’s a skill they still need to be taught, learn, and practice. What I’m trying to say is that using “biological” or “natural” reasons to excuse men’s unwillingness to work on themselves only holds them back. It stops them from taking accountability for their struggles and keeps them stuck in unsuccessful p…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 07:32 PM
6

The reality for many men paints a different picture. A lot are struggling with issues like porn and gaming addictions, feeling stuck and miserable. The idea that men are naturally better at emotional regulation doesn’t match the average man’s experience today. Relying on biological advantages isn’t a solution in our modern society. Refusing to grow and adapt only leads to men falling behind in life. It’s the easy way out a way to avoid the hard work of self-improvement. But in the long run, it j…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 06:17 PM
3

We’re all shaped by our environment growing up, and learning how to process emotions is a big part of that. Sure, studies show that male hormones can help with emotional regulation, but that doesn’t mean men automatically have it all figured out. Many men today struggle with loneliness and anger because they’ve never learned healthy coping mechanisms or acceptable ways to express their feelings. Emotional control isn’t something that just happens it’s a skill that needs to be taught and practice…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 05:44 PM
6

Empathy is the ability to deeply understand how someone else feels and acknowledge their emotional needs. But recognizing and expressing our own feelings is just as important for good mental health. The way society teaches men to suppress their emotions is a big factor behind men’s violence and the high suicide rates. Men could really learn from women when it comes to processing their own feelings. And let’s be honest: claiming women are “too emotional” to lead sounds more like a ridiculous atte…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 05:09 PM
4

Playing the victim and blaming the other gender doesn’t help anyone. Relationship problems can only be solved with open, respectful communication. That means taking things like nagging seriously and not dismissing your partner’s feelings as “unreasonable” or “insecure.” Take something like a dead bedroom it’s often tied to deeper issues. Fixing it requires both partners to be willing to put in the work. A relationship can only thrive when both are equally committed to making it better.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 03:51 PM
7

I don’t get why some people act like sex is a wife’s chore. Sex isn’t something anyone owes their partner, no matter the relationship. Expecting it creates toxic dynamics. In a loving relationship, intimacy happens naturally. it’s something both partners want. Demanding it just kills the connection and turns it into something transactional. Relationships should be about mutual respect, not unrealistic expectations.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 03:11 PM
13

When women start nagging, it’s often a last, desperate attempt to save the relationship. It’s trying to be heard. Living with a man who refuses to take on his share of responsibilities in the relationship is exhausting.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 01:54 PM
8

support for a life they helped create? It’s their DNA, their child. Why should they get a free pass to walk away from their obligations? If a guy chooses to sleep around without considering the consequences, he needs to take accountability for his actions. If he’s worried about being “trapped,” maybe he should choose partners more wisely or rethink his approach. Demanding sex without any consequences is not just reckless—it’s delusional. Men already get off easy compared to women, who not only f…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 08:50 AM
1

No, I know what you mean. I just hardly disagree with your solutions.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 09:35 PM
1

Girl, please. Read it again. I never mentioned responsibilities—only what relationships provide for both partners besides sex: love, care, and support. This obviously includes being understanding when one partner isn’t in the mood for intimacy. (And yes, men aren’t always in the mood either, lol)
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 09:16 PM
1

Yeah… threatening your spouse with cheating or divorce is emotional manipulation. The fear of losing the relationship creates pressure, which can lead someone to force themselves to have sex even when they don’t want to. That’s not healthy intimacy—it’s coercion, and it damages trust and connection The words you are choosing are horrible. Relationships are not businesses. Sex is not a good on a marketplace. These are people with feelings. Relationships include Love, affection, care, connection(b…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 08:52 PM
0

“She has to want to satisfy her husband’s need” That’s sounds so horrible. You can’t control want so what’s your solution? She has to force herself? Let him use her body?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 08:15 PM
1

Sex isn’t a service—it’s an intimate experience meant to bring pleasure to both partners. Attraction is essential, and it’s not something we can control. When someone loses attraction, it’s usually not intentional. In most cases, a lack of intimacy stems from deeper issues within the relationship. In a healthy partnership, these problems can be addressed through communication and resolved. Forcing sex is absolutely not the answer. The way you demonize people who ‘refuse sex’ is off-putting. Shou…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 08:08 PM
1

Abusive behaviour is not a flex 💀
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 07:44 PM
1

No it’s not competition. It’s a partnership which should benefit both sides equal, healthy communication is the key. Her reasons are important if he wants a solution.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 06:03 PM
1

Exactly, and the same goes for the wife’s needs they’re equally valid. A man’s needs aren’t more important. If you’re lucky enough to find a partner who shares your fantasies, jackpot! But if he’s not willing to meet her needs, she has every reason to refuse his. Simple as that, lol
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 05:38 PM
3

If men aren’t happy, they can divorce and find new relationships that suit their needs better. The same goes for women. No-fault divorce isn’t biased toward either gender. Some men don’t divorce because they’re afraid of being lonely or not knowing how to live on their own. Studies show that men often rely on their wives for emotional support and unpaid labor. Women, on the other hand, usually have larger social networks and deeper friendships.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 05:12 PM
-2

You know women like sex too, right? They have instinctive sexual needs to fulfill just like men. It’s not a service women provide for men. If a man can’t offer satisfying intimacy, he shouldn’t be surprised when she loses interest.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 05:10 PM
2

There’s no need to get emotional. I’d recommend reading my comments again. Gisele Bündchen was a highly paid supermodel long before their marriage, and she provided for their family too. A marriage based on love requires more than just money. They had different priorities when it came to family life, but they still tried for years. At some point, though, it’s okay to divorce. There’s no need to make one side the villain.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 05:14 PM
2

It wasn’t my intention to justify her cheating — that’s disgusting behavior. :) I’m just trying to point out that status and money don’t guarantee a long-term happy marriage. Winning Super Bowls doesn’t automatically make someone a good husband
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 04:35 PM
0

Lol, you’re missing the point. Long-term emotional connection matters way more than material things. Tom Brady didn’t get divorced because of money — he got divorced because he couldn’t provide the emotional connection his wife needed. He promised to quit football and focus on family, but after years of her waiting and him breaking that promise, she finally left. Oh, and by the way, his ex-wife was the highest-paid supermodel in the world for 14 years straight — she made plenty of money on her o…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 04:09 PM
1

That’s good :) More men should do that if they feel uncomfortable. Men have the same right to bodily integrity as woman
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 07:18 PM
6

If your environment is this way. I’m sorry for you this behaviour is not acceptable. I hope you voiced your discomfort towards her.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 06:59 PM
6

Is a massage needed? The things I said should be common sense. If they want to date, it’s their own responsibility( not womens )to be proactive
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 06:53 PM
7

You can do the same things. Nothing you said is gender specific. Dress up, wear revealing clothing, self care, flirt with consent. If a man approaches in a respectful not pushy way- most of women would react friendly. If she rejects you leave her alone. If the “approach” crosses boundaries you are not entitled to get a friendly response. Approach strangers comes with risks ofc
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 06:33 PM
6

How many times have you seen situations like this? In real life not TikTok, YouTube, or Reddit, it’s never okay to say things like that to a stranger. It’s creepy, crosses boundaries, and is straight-up harassment. A stable guy wouldn’t see that as a compliment. not everyone is as desperate as some of these lonely guys on Reddit
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 06:17 PM
9

Some women might be this way. But the majority of single by choice women just want to be left alone. Male validation has no value, toys are more satisfying, fun dinner nights with her girls, and a friend group who supports each other’s. Men have a hard time accepting that…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 05:05 PM
15

Bro, what? Men can express their sexuality however they want—with their hands or with people who actually consent. If someone’s not interested, leave them alone. Pressuring them isn’t self-expression; it’s harassment. Why should a man’s sexuality matter more than a woman’s right to autonomy, or her physical and mental well-being? No one has an automatic right to love, relationships, or sex. If nobody wants you, there’s usually a good reason for it. Work on yourself, become someone others actuall…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 04:45 PM
11

Criticizing men for their misbehavior towards single mothers isn’t discrimination. I don’t understand why you feel entitled to women’s labour.. If you don’t want to date people with kids, just don’t do it. She already has children, so there’s no need to take on the extra burden of dating a single dad
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/24 12:27 AM
17

😭 crazy right?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/24 12:13 AM
12

Ok and that is bad exactly why? She is mother and rightfully prioritise the wellbeing of her children over some stranger. it’s not the woman’s responsibility to take care of everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/24 12:08 AM
17

Woman choosing relationship partners based on personal preference and experience is not discrimination…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/24 11:51 PM
14

I think using the word ‘discrimination’ was a bad choice. Like I said before personal taste or preferences are not a form of discrimination
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/24 11:48 PM
26

Yeah and? I don’t see the issue. It’s fine to not want to raise the children of strangers. This goes for both men and women. I
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/24 11:45 PM
4

He can. Don’t let your gender define who you are. There are plenty of opportunities out there. OnlyFans, TikTok, etc. Since the market is flooded with women, men actually have a better chance of being successful. You just have to accept that your content will mostly attract other men
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/24 11:41 PM
16

It’s not self-defense if you hit someone back. Dating preferences are not form of discrimination 😭 Their action makes them the aggressor, too. Self-defense is meant to prevent further escalation, while hitting back is just revenge—nothing more. Single dads are often just as unattractive to women as single moms are to men.”
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/24 11:34 PM
8

Idk, I live in a country where prostitution is legal and people with strong disabilities can have a sex companions paid for by health insurance for elderly and disabled people to help fulfill their sexual needs.(Germany) It doesn’t solve anything lol .
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/24 04:56 PM
5

It’s both incredibly sad and hilarious. Sometimes I almost wish I could be that level of delusional. Life would be so easy lol
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/24 04:08 PM
18

I honestly can’t believe there are people who think like this. Loneliness sucks. I totally get that. But thinking the solution is to have the government force women against their will is insane.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/24 03:27 PM
1

I’m happy for you :) with age the gaps are not important anymore. Gender roles are deeper than money, as the older one you also provide stability, safety sometimes guidance and wisdom. sharing finances equally is the right step to break the roles
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 11:44 PM
2

We will see more reserved age-gap couples in the future. :) The old man + young woman dynamic has its roots in the dating scenes of decades ago. It’s the same for gender roles. For men, dating younger women was normal or even a goal. They had to provide and establish stable careers before marriage, leading to men marrying later. On the other hand, women only needed basic homemaker skills. Due to laws, they were dependent on men to take care of them and needed to marry much younger. These roles a…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 11:10 PM
3

True, I think we can basically agree that people date those they are attracted to, regardless of age. I just think it’s problematic to generalize preferences. When I was 18-20, I thought something was wrong with me for not liking older men. So many people pushed the narrative that women only want older men. I don’t know why… Now, I think it was more of a tactic to convince women to get into relationships with older men. That’s my personal reason for not liking such phrases.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 10:52 PM
5

Old men aren’t a catch either. Most age poorly, often worse than women, considering women do a lot of aging prevention, eat healthy, and take their health seriously. The fantasy of old men being wanted by 20-year-old women is a myth sold by Hollywood, rich, and powerful men. Average old guys aren’t included. If they try hitting on young girls, I guarantee they become the group chat highlight, and everyone laughs at them. They come off as desperate old men who can’t keep up with their own age and…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 09:36 PM
1

t’s not about money, dumbass. Society has more facets than just income. Money doesn’t make them respect you, they will never accept you as a part of the inner circle. Social background, race, gender, and religion all influence your social status. Regardless of your income, your skin color alone can be enough to oppress you and slave you. It’s your natural life purpose, you can only be happy by following your biology. Serve, obey or die It’s identical to your desired concept, except you use gende…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 08:55 PM
13

Women already do these things because society expects them to. Women are judged their whole lives by their appearance. Being beautiful is more appreciated than being intelligent. Society paints a picture that it’s necessary for a woman to have perfect hair, nails, skincare, and makeup. When women express the wish that men improve their appearance and start taking care of themselves, it’s not about demanding that men do more than women. They just want to see the same effort. If a woman is always …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 08:24 PM
1

Makes it even sadder. But I it reminds me of the phrase. Lacking in solidarity - that has always been the normal condition of capitalism, the story of all class struggles has always begun with the weak ones, the disconnected ones, and the jaded ones fighting one another and kicking down where possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 08:01 PM
1

Only white cis men are capable of coming up with bs like this. It’s easy to say if you’re part of the privileged group… No one who has experienced real oppression would consider enslaving half the population for their own pleasure. It’s evil, cruel, and insane. We are all human—we feel the same love, pain, and sadness. Why are men’s feelings so important that they justify women’s suffering and pain? This mindset is only possible if you don’t see women as equal humans. Taking some random aspect l…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 03:38 PM
2

Don’t use the term equity as a justification for wanting men to have zero responsibilities when they impregnate a women. Biological women carry the burden of child bearing. Everybody has the control over their own bodies means women decide about abortion or in advance hormone Contraception. The man has the same rights in order to minimise the risk of pregnancy. Use condoms, get a vasectomy or then your fear of pregnancy becomes paranoid just don’t have sex. If you are so dumb and fuck raw, you c…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 07:13 PM
1

It’s not equally - both being drafted or military is completely voluntary what’s equal rights for everyone. It doesn’t help everyone. it’s not comparable. You only increase the hate towards men’s rights. Men being drafted doesn’t justify rape, psychological torture, abuse bodies , capture. What mindset is required for this horrible fantasy to punish women. Most women, me included, would happily Join the military, fight and defend the country.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 05:47 AM
1

I just don’t get what makes you guys come up with such horrible scenarios. This group should be focused on men’s rights—like pushing to get rid of the draft and only having volunteers in the military. But instead, you guys use it to spread hate and let your sick torture fantasies run wild. It’s scary and just verity’s people think it’s really ‘all men.’
/r/MensRights09/06/24 03:21 AM
3

Your conclusion is based on the idea that women have some kind of fixed biological nature to get married and have children. That’s simply not true for most women. Living in peace by yourself is better than settling for less.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 03:23 AM
2

It’s easy to lose yourself in this internal blizzard of online theories and informations, finding the truth became impossible. Untreated paranoia can have a serious impact on your life. It leads to Mistrust and constant anxiety. Healthy relationships and interactions with others will fail due to constant fear of betrayal. It Can course problems with employment and personal relationships!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 08:16 PM
1

The first priority in life should always be well being and happiness. It’s understandable that you feel treated by false accusations cause it’s a topic which got blowed up a lot on social media platforms. It’s easy to get lost in thoughts of fear and frustration. It’s important to recognise warning signs if they become unhealthy and harmful. Paranoia can harm your relationships and environment, because you're unable to trust anyone. Paranoia may cause you to become: Suspicious about everyone in …
/r/MensRights26/05/24 09:07 PM
3

Please start taking your medication again and seek instruction in a facility capable of caring for you, no matter which cave you have hidden in. Some of you need to touch some grass. Creating an imaginary gender hierarchy to justify your mindset of „natural dominating women“ is another lvl of delulu and in a crazy way really funny lol Your „dominance“ can’t help your unsuccessful life. It’s more likely that you become a joke in your environment.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 08:05 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter