TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Expensive-Space-3000 Archive

View 0 posts and 16 comments by Expensive-Space-3000 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

For most animals procreation and childbirth is nowhere near as difficult though. They still care for their offspring.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 09:54 PM
1

That's a win for women as they can then more easily find the men who actually want to develop relationships rather than use you like a sex toy. Only a win that these men are honestly out of dating pool.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 09:39 PM
1

So to spesific women, and in the past to other women too.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 07:59 PM
1

So I gave examples that there have been societies that prevented women being pregnant. China still does that to Uyghurs.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 07:55 PM
1

They can just procreate with any man of their choice? I don't think so.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 07:36 PM
1

I gave other examples where it was governmental policy.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 07:34 PM
1

They absolutely did. Even one of my relatives was practically forced to abort her child as the family did not approve it. Wasn't that uncommon in old times.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 07:23 PM
1

You know women also lose their children if they are pedos?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 07:22 PM
1

What about birds? They are mothers too.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 03:45 PM

In the past there were even greater "sacrifices and suffering" as more women died during childbirth. Did invention of new medicine take away from motherhood?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 03:38 PM
1

You'd still need the permission from authorities, children for example would not be handed out to pedos.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 03:27 PM

They are still living beings so not just anyone could have them. Just like today it is in fact community, experts etc who decides who can adopt, and politics decide if lgbt people can adopt and so on.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 03:23 PM

Only a minority of women care about that control and more so in societies with few safety nets or opportunity to make their own money. In rich European welfare states far less women want to be gold diggers. It isn't that pleasant "career" at all no matter how much "control" you think a woman has that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 03:11 PM
1

Mere consent of woman isn't even enough in most societies. The community also has a say. Children are taken away from abusive women too.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 02:58 PM
1

There would still be regulation of course and in a democratic society children would not be handed out to just anybody but the community would have their say in certain standards. Just like not just anyone can adopt.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 02:56 PM

Women would still take care of those babies and be mothers lol, I doubt most men would be as interested. And even in medieval times there were nuns, women were not sent to chattel slavery even if they did not have children. Besides this is only an artificial womb (and of course would have regulation just like adoption) not an artificial sex slave or something like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 02:49 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter