TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Extension-Humor4281 Archive

View 2 posts and 290 comments by Extension-Humor4281 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Actually I think it isn't useful at all. Its the opposite of useful because it conditions people to see these types of views as only being held by extremely stupid or extremely racist or sexist people. you see the same crap on The Boys, where they straw man all the people concerned about immigration as nothing more than a bunch of closeted White supremacists.
/r/MensRights13/05/26 04:07 AM
20

I mean that's basically where we are right now as a society. late boomers, gen x, and now millennials, all venerated single motherhood as peak female empowerment while simultaneously shaming men for not wanting to be fathers at whatever arbitrary time the woman decides.
/r/MensRights27/04/26 04:30 AM
32

So they want 90% of men, and single men at that, to bankroll women going after the top 10% of men and having kids with them. Well at least now we really see the end result of feminism. women making tax slaves of all the undesirable men, using them to fund their hypergamy with the tiny minority of super desirable men.
/r/MensRights27/04/26 04:27 AM
1

CNN hasn't had credibility for a long time, especially when it comes to any leftist hot button topic. There are entire threads devoted to cataloging all of the outright lies and misinformation they have pedaled over the last decade alone.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 06:54 PM
1

From the moment I saw the initial headlines around this, I knew the numbers were being hyperinflated by militant feminists to justify their "rape culture" narrative.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 06:53 PM
7

Glad somebody called out this BS. I also like how you highlighted how when men treat women the way they treat other men, women view it as sexism or antagonism. The reality is most women don't understand what it is to live as a man, and when men treat them the way they treat other men, suddenly they realize how it feels to not have pretty privilege or have people take your feelings more seriously because you can cry more openly without social stigma.
/r/MensRights17/04/26 03:51 AM
12

My hypothesis about this is that, since women tend to be more frequently bisexual than men, Butch lesbians see men as inherent competition. Whereas gay men don't view women as competition for the attentions of other gay men.
/r/MensRights17/04/26 03:46 AM
1

In that case, I apologize. to respond to your question at face value, what is happening is likely the same thing that happens in most other communities that are heavily impoverished. Cycles of parental neglect, abuse, alcoholism, drug abuse, and violence.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 06:26 AM
1

Are. you implying that because men are the majority of murderers, male victims are somehow less important than female victims? Or perhaps that the male victims are somehow at fault simply for sharing the same group as the perpetrator?
/r/MensRights15/04/26 07:18 PM
1

Leftist governments love appealing to women and their issues because women as a group are overwhelmingly more likely to favor greater government control.
/r/MensRights15/04/26 07:16 PM
24

I legitimately laughed out loud when I got to "men need to pay 50% of the bills." Like damn, it would be sweet to pay that little compared to what we pay for now. 😂
/r/MensRights12/04/26 03:41 PM
6

I mean, relative to the sum total of recorded human history, the housewife is certainly not something that only existed for a brief period. As far as humanity goes, it's borderline the default state of women. Granted in the ancient world, things like cooking food involved a lot more steps, like foraging, processing, storing, etc. It was arduous time consuming work, equivalent in importance to what the men did in the tribe. That's not even getting into things like craft work.
/r/MensRights01/12/25 05:09 AM
4

Exactly right. Inclusivity when it comes to mail spaces, but exclusivity when it comes to female spaces.
/r/MensRights27/11/25 02:42 AM
1

I'm surprised it's not a more frequent talking point that men are expected to respect women's bodily autonomy despite having had their own bodily autonomy violated from the moment they were born.
/r/MensRights20/11/25 11:59 PM
0

Yeah, I was with him until he dropped that last line in that paragraph. That's nothing more than feminist smear garbage. I've yet to meet a true in cell who thought they were entitled to sex, only that they thought it was unfair that women can find sex and companionship so easily and Men like them are basically ignored. I lament the fact that I don't have a million dollars, but that doesn't mean I think I'm entitled to it.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 03:09 PM
3

I feel so bad for women who actually love, appreciate, and speak up for the good men in the world.l and in their lives. These hateful ideologues are always trying to make them feel like traitors to their sex.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 09:34 AM
3

Reminds me of all those articles about in cell culture and how it was of primary concern because of its alleged relation to the extremist pipeline. Not, you know, because men are lonely, miserable, and having less sex and fewer relationships than ever.
/r/MensRights15/11/25 07:58 PM
3

I think men should be as respected as women. But I guarantee some feminist will find a way to see this as a sexist statement.
/r/MensRights15/11/25 07:56 PM
15

To be fair, there's also a selection bias at play here in that this is only applying to those who have already been convicted of rape. Whether or not the statistic applies to the greater population of those accused, that's open to speculation.
/r/MensRights15/11/25 05:27 AM
8

You have to consider that, for all the talk in countries like America and the UK about the supposed feminization of modern men, men in Germany have been going through that transformation since the end of world war II. Any notion of pride, aggressive confrontation, or traditional masculinity has been beaten out of them on a cultural level. German men don't protest because German men as a group are conditioned from birth to be passive, quiet, compliant, orderly, and non-confrontational. Of course …
/r/MensRights13/11/25 03:36 PM
18

Because Germany is a feminist shithole like most Western countries these days.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 06:31 AM
5

Honestly, I'd be prepared for a lot of skepticism and even a bit of hostility from some of the men on this forum. There are a lot of people here who have been very ignored or screwed over in various ways by either women in their lives or by society at large. So there's likely to be a certain amount of defensiveness here, even though it definitely seems like you are coming from a place of empathy. I do want to say that I really appreciate you taking the time to explore this subject, especially as…
/r/MensRights11/11/25 05:17 PM
11

I do think it's worth clarifying here that being subject to societal gender norms does not indicate patriarchy. I do believe that you are well intentioned with the data that you are trying to collect here, I just think it's worth pointing out that you'd probably have better luck gathering meaningful information if you simply focus on societal expectations and their effects, rather than classifying your demographic as "men living in a patriarchy."
/r/MensRights11/11/25 05:06 PM
14

Maybe the author is in a place like Afghanistan. If that's the case I'd give them a pass, but also say that theyd probably have better luck asking this on a forum related to that specific country.
/r/MensRights11/11/25 04:58 PM
42

Was about to say, the entire premise of this research is flawed for this very obvious reason.
/r/MensRights11/11/25 04:57 PM
0

If anything, the above poster highlighted how showing domestically capable dads wasn't really a thing unless it was an actual plot point of the show.
/r/MensRights01/11/25 01:19 PM
3

Agree. If men can be forced to take paternity tests in order to establish paternity, then women should be forced to comply as well.
/r/MensRights27/10/25 09:44 PM
-3

Nailed it. She's no ally to men.
/r/MensRights08/10/25 10:13 AM
-1

My thoughts exactly. She does only spouts the most superficial manosphere talking points, including garbage like what you'd hear from Andrew Tate. She's actively damaging the cause of men's rights with her grifting.
/r/MensRights08/10/25 10:11 AM
1

Conservatives think men shouldn't need help; liberals believe men don't deserve help.
/r/MensRights31/08/25 09:04 AM
1

Real heroes
/r/MensRights24/08/25 07:47 PM
-5

Yeah I really don't see an issue with choosing the gender in the embryotic stage when you already have three kids that are boys. It's not wrong to want to have a girl too.
/r/MensRights22/08/25 04:02 PM
13

They probably think their daughters will all grow up to be childless successful career women.
/r/MensRights22/08/25 04:00 PM
23

Women also consistently demonstrate a hiring bias in favor of other women. So women dominating HR means that men are getting phased out of the job market simply for being male.
/r/MensRights22/08/25 03:58 PM
2

There are egitimately so many apologists on Facebook talking about how she was acquitted of any charges. Of course all these women are conveniently leaving out the fact that the only reason she wasn't charged is because her man explicitly refused to press charges because he "didn't want to feel like a victim."
/r/MensRights18/08/25 08:32 PM
3

I'll definitely say that many people, especially on the internet, grossly misuse the word misogyny. Misandry, on the other hand, I feel is actually used pretty appropriately because it is generally used to highlight explicitly anti-male laws and programs pushed by feminists, laws which discriminate and punish the majority of men by generalizing them based on the actions of a few. That's barely even getting into the outright war on notions of traditional masculinity and how feminists have been at…
/r/MensRights15/08/25 06:26 PM
8

The irony of laws like this is that it basically ensures men will have even less interest in single moms.
/r/MensRights12/08/25 05:31 PM
1

That's not even getting into the reality that so many of these men don't even find out about the fraud until they're into their 40s and 50s and can't easily date anymore. Imagine missing your prime dating and or child raising years because your partner lied to you. Even if you come out the other side financially stable, you've missed out on the ability to use your prime adult years to enjoy your relationship and raise kids.
/r/MensRights12/08/25 05:25 PM
15

It's pretty jarring honestly the amount of feminists I've met who truly seem to view anyone who opposes their beliefs as less than human. Like they have no issue with the idea of their political opponents losing their jobs, being ostracized from their communities, and being forced to basically live as paupers simply for believing the wrong things.
/r/MensRights10/08/25 02:21 AM
1

You do realize that the field of psychology has existed far longer than the current feminist infiltration of it, right? Saying that therapy is useful is not some piece of feminist propaganda.
/r/MensRights09/08/25 04:54 PM
4

No, basic psychology and sociology. I'm not talking about feminist theory or any of that garbage. I'm talking about the average person walking around on the street and how utterly clueless they are about their own formative experiences that formed their present day habits. Man who go into therapy wanting simple solutions are basically a problem in and of themselves, because they don't realize that they are the problem. But the core of why that problem and those behaviors exist can stretch back y…
/r/MensRights09/08/25 02:58 AM
-2

Except that many men don't actually understand what they're problem is. They understand symptoms but haven't ever discovered the true "why" that drives their issues over and over.
/r/MensRights09/08/25 01:31 AM
-5

Therapy isn't supposed to GIVE you the solution. It's supposed to help you find it by getting to the core of what's really wrong in your life.
/r/MensRights09/08/25 01:30 AM
1

Men are the ones who pioneered and developed modern clinical psychology. You just need to find a therapist that doesn't center their methodology around flawed, biased concepts like race and gender theory.
/r/MensRights09/08/25 01:29 AM
1

Exercise is not a substitute for therapy though. It won't fix underlying issues and destructive thinking traps. Use both exercise and therapy so that you're setting yourself up for positive change, both physically and mentally.
/r/MensRights09/08/25 01:27 AM
10

I've gone to therapy with two different therapists over the last couple decades. Both times I specifically opted to find a male therapist. Both times helped me get through very low points in my life and helped me get re-centered enough to be productive in my job and in my personal life again. I know it's tempting to write off therapy as pointless because of how fem centric it has become, especially with the unscientific BS that pervades the APA now. But a good therapist, and especially one that …
/r/MensRights09/08/25 01:25 AM
20

It's times like this where I care less and less that PBS is losing funding.
/r/MensRights05/08/25 08:55 PM
13

I know it's a generalization, but I do think it's a pretty accurate one that you made. Men view danger as inherent to life, a sliding scale of risk versus reward. Manny women generally view danger as something to be avoided entirely.
/r/MensRights05/08/25 08:00 PM
10

That's actually pretty much the common approach in the western world, disadvantaging the majority and ignoring their will in order to placate a small minority in society.
/r/MensRights29/07/25 03:50 PM
2

The most amusing thing about the revelation of this app and all its content leaking is that it basically highlights and unique example of toxic femininity. A bunch of passive aggressive, bitter, conniving shrews who conspire to destroy the reputations of people they don't like and get them ostracized from society.
/r/MensRights29/07/25 03:49 PM
3

They embrace the elements of patriarchy that expect men to cater to all her needs while having a high-paying job and buying her a house for all those kids she probably won't even have.
/r/MensRights26/07/25 10:11 PM
1

^ This is the real answer. Pin this comment and close the discussion.
/r/MensRights26/07/25 10:08 PM
4

Women support themselves for obvious reasons and men support gynocentrism in order to feel more manly and protective.
/r/MensRights25/07/25 10:44 AM
2

Yes, but at least before there was the pretense of equality of the sexes and impartiality in the justice system. Now they're just flat out telling men that legally our lives are worth less than those of women. Honestly it's kind of liberating because at least now I won't ever have to feel bad for any calamity I read about in Italy. After all, half their population doesn't matter anymore, right?
/r/MensRights25/07/25 10:42 AM
37

Been hypothesizing that for a while now. Men and women also simply have different standards for what "clean" is, in my admittedly biased experience. Women will frequently hyper-fixate until a space is absolutely spotless, whereas the guy will clean away dirt with soap and water and call it good. Obviously there are exceptions to this on both sides, but I'm just speaking generally.
/r/MensRights21/07/25 05:37 AM
2

I'm glad somebody saved me the time of talking about this in detail.
/r/MensRights18/07/25 04:02 AM
5

Calling one of the most iconic natural landmarks in the U.K. "just a tree" is wild, dude. Like I'm pro men's rights, but these dudes are capital A-holes who deserve real punishment. The issue isn't their sentence. It's that female offenders get off with lesser sentences for more heinous crimes.
/r/MensRights16/07/25 01:36 AM
4

One thing I hope you'll keep in mind, and I don't mean this as some kind of snide "gotcha," is that women abuse more children (in the United States) than men. Now mind you, when you control for the number of single-mother households leading to increased chances for women to abuse, the gender split might be roughly even. But the point is that societal perception of who the abuser usually is (men) doesn't line up with reality. https://www.statista.com/statistics/418470/number-of-perpetrators-in-ch…
/r/MensRights04/07/25 03:04 AM
2

I second this. He's doing an incredible service to these children by providing them with a supportive, caring male role model early on in their lives.
/r/MensRights04/07/25 02:57 AM
9

I'd say this thread covers it pretty well. https://www.reddit.com/r/NoStupidQuestions/comments/11n102b/what_is_a_tech_bro_and_why_does_everybody_seem_to/
/r/MensRights01/07/25 04:35 AM
13

But what is a tech bro? It's simply a man who is passionate about technology. That's definitely not what most people consider to be a tech bro.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 02:09 AM
2

No, life not going your way is a normal part of life. Your issue is the fact that you can't manage your anger when life doesn't go your way. You don't have emotional resilience and so you default to anger when you are met with obstacles. Exploring your emotions and the processes that drive them through therapy can help you mitigate those instinctive reactions.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 09:37 PM
2

You're getting into semantics and missing the point entirely. Your issues are your feelings and your feelings are your issues. Actions are what follow both. You can't simply change your actions and expect your issues to resolve themselves.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 07:50 AM
-2

Many people want easy solutions without realizing that their feelings are the root cause of their troubles.
/r/MensRights29/06/25 08:54 PM
10

Patriarchy "theory" is basically just a euphemism for "gendered societal norms" but which places the implied blame squarely on men's shoulders. It's not even a theory in the scientific sense, but rather a nebulous sociological concept to which feminist can ascribe blame for basically everything wrong with society in their view. I greatly disagree that therapy isn't for men, however. Feminist-centric therapy isn't for men, yes. Find a therapist that doesn't root their model of healthy male behavi…
/r/MensRights29/06/25 08:52 PM
2

Well look at this in terms of numbers. Whenever a child is born in the United States, it's nearly always because the mother wants it. So if there's one parent in this scenario who might not want the child, it's almost always going to be the man, simply because he never had a say it it to begin with.
/r/MensRights27/06/25 04:46 AM
2

Would a man meet the beautiful woman and not date her because of her job? Never. There's one exception to that: sex workers. For obvious reasons.
/r/MensRights24/05/25 01:49 AM
4

This goes right along with how the term "dad bod" has slowly morphed from "dude who used to lift but now has a beer belly" into "jacked dude whose BMI isn't quite low enough to have an eight pack."
/r/MensRights21/05/25 06:54 AM
45

Isn't it though? At any given time there are a finite amount of jobs, a finite number of homes available to own, etc.
/r/MensRights06/05/25 05:09 AM
2

From a marketing perspective, misandrist feminism is something women love and men tolerate. Men's rights is something men somewhat like but women absolutely HATE. It's easy to see why corporations keep siding with the man-haters.
/r/MensRights06/05/25 02:48 AM
2

I wish I could upvote this a hundred times.
/r/MensRights06/05/25 02:45 AM
3

TLDR: The budget doesn't have enough money and all these other groups had to get their cut first. Unfortunately that's likely to remain the case going forward. The state tends to listen to the groups that complain the loudest, and frankly men aren't advocating for themselves and their sons in any large numbers.
/r/MensRights29/04/25 05:35 PM
49

You nailed it. When your pain becomes a competition between you and your partner, it's already over unless they both take a step back and learn how to communicate better.
/r/MensRights29/04/25 05:14 PM
30

Buddy, if your wife is talking to you like that over such a lighthearted everyday comment, she has much deeper issues with you than she's letting on. When women start casually minimizing your issues or disrespecting you like that, it shows they don't love you anymore, not in the way that a marriage needs. Considering talking about it with her and seeing if you can get to the bottom of what's troubling her. Their might be something else in her life going on that is causing her a lot of stress. St…
/r/MensRights29/04/25 05:11 PM
12

It's a small mercy that he was only in jail for a month and not actual prison.
/r/MensRights07/04/25 07:33 AM
15

Pretty much this. If you ever doubt misandry exists, just look at the comment sections for any video in which a woman gets ultra-violent with a man over something mundane.
/r/MensRights15/03/25 09:54 PM
1

Seeing the lack of awareness when it comes to men's utter lack of reproductive autonomy. Historically, women were subjected to social mores like "if you didn't want children, you shouldn't have had sex." Today we all clearly understand how absurd this statement is. Having sex is not consent to become a parent against your will. Yet today men are literally held to that exact standard, regardless of what protective measures they use or agreements they have with their female partner. She can unilat…
/r/MensRights15/03/25 09:44 PM
9

Was waiting for someone to post this
/r/MensRights11/03/25 11:08 PM
282

France basically legalized cuckholdry by making it illegal to get paternity tests without a judge-mandated court order.
/r/MensRights07/03/25 05:41 AM
25

Insult to injury is that men pay the majority of all taxes in most countries, even when you factor out the rich people. Yet men get the least amount of years during which they can benefit from state benefits.
/r/MensRights01/03/25 03:09 AM
11

I've pointed this out to folks multiple times. Nearly everything they claim men conspire to do against women are things that women are proven to do against men. Women complain about "good ol' boys clubs" while they themselves conspire to create women-only spaces and communities within organizations that serve to only advance women through networking and preferential treatment. Women complain about "locker room talk," despite the fact that I've never heard men discuss the intimate sexual quirks o…
/r/MensRights27/02/25 01:52 AM
1

I know France gets mocked a lot still for essentially being effete surrender-jockeys because of WWII, and I've always considered this largely unfair. But damned if the men in France aren't the biggest bunch of cuckholded wimps on planet earth for ever allowing this kind of thing to become law.
/r/MensRights26/02/25 08:55 AM
1

They don't want us to have agency. They just want us to pay for their children, regardless of where they come from.
/r/MensRights26/02/25 08:53 AM
6

She really didn't though. She got suicidal because she didn't know how to live without having powers or being the avatar. Then they immediately gave her airbending powers and she's back to kicking ass. Total wasting growth opportunity.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 07:06 AM
22

To be fair, Korra got lots of criticism when her character was released. Not because she was female, but because she was an entitled, abrasive brute of a character.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 08:40 PM
67

Best part is either the boy who was raped or the husband who was cheated on get to pay child support for the next 18 years.
/r/MensRights21/02/25 03:02 AM
4

From my own anecdotal experience, most of the "sex traitors" who recognize that double standards exist but play into them in order to make themselves feel more manly, are the ball cap jock types. So clearly this isn't a trend that's universal. I've seen so many of those types basically shame the more effeminate "soy boys" and "incels" for being whiny and just not fit enough or attractive enough to attract women. They also double down with the traditionalist slogans such as "a man's first duty is…
/r/MensRights16/02/25 11:24 PM
18

The amusing thing is that white women are the overwhelming recipients of such grants, despite them "being in the same hot tub as white men," to quote Bill Burr.
/r/MensRights09/02/25 09:49 PM
3

They'd have to want white men on their side to even begin heading in that direction.
/r/MensRights09/02/25 09:42 PM
10

Interesting thing here is that I see two men immediately moving to physically move their own women away and shield them from the attacker. They're prioritizing the safety of their own women at the expense of the stranger. The only guy who acts against the mugger is the older guy who is by himself.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 09:23 PM
1

Women who orgasm from penile penetration alone might be a minority, but I don't think anyone will argue that it's almost always with an average-to-above average penis size. There are simply physical limitations to small penises that make penetrative orgasms more difficult to achieve. Things like sufficient girth to encourage stretching the vaginal wall to stimulate more nerve endings appropriate length to properly encourage G-spot stimulation are both significant factors in this. Obviously we ca…
/r/MensRights07/02/25 09:13 PM
38

Pretty accurate. Men rarely even talk about women when women aren't around. We're too busy doing other things that are enjoyable. Women, on the other hand, seem to make it a habit to routinely shit-talk the men in their lives. Frankly the whole thing comes off as female projection. They think men routinely engage in the same petty gossip they do and it bothers them.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 09:10 AM
25

This article is rich, considering that I've been the one who provided the bulk of the emotional support in basically every romantic relationship I've ever had. I can't count the number of times I've had to sit through cry fests, emotional breakdowns, and general venting about their day at work just so they could continue being functional.
/r/MensRights28/01/25 10:18 AM
19

Anyways, all of that to say that please do not think that feminists do not want you to have your own spaces. Many definitely don't, because they see male-only spaces as a threat to the advancement and inclusion of women.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 09:58 AM
18

Social media drowns women in attention, most of which comes from very horny, very desperate men. Anyone drowning in attention from the opposite sex is going to develop a very inflated sense of their own desirability, to the point where they'll see the majority of people out there as undesirable. It's not even really a problem with women. It's just simple numbers. The more options you have, the more selective you can afford to be. In the old days, women still got attention, but the numbers were m…
/r/MensRights23/01/25 02:55 AM
6

What stay at home mum only has laundry to do? Who said they only do laundry? It was an example of a chore . . . Did you know a newborn needs feeding once every two hours, and they can suckle for 45 mins? That is literally an hour on, an hour off. Indeed, I did. Newborns are incredibly taxing, which is why both parents should be heavily involved with it as much as they can. Most women in relationships aren't caring for newborns though.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 12:03 AM
13

Depends on their personal preferences and how efficiently they work. My experience with several female partners is that they 1) took far longer to complete the same chores, compared to me, and 2) had their own "additional" chores which they felt were necessary but which weren't part of our shared responsibilities.
/r/MensRights22/01/25 07:16 PM
9

Studies like this one aren't very helpful because they depend too much on self-perception. A man can feel like he's doing less because he spends less time doing work, but he might be working more efficiently and overall getting more done in a shorter amount of time. A woman might casually do laundry throughout the entire day and then count that as an entire day of work. Without actual quantification, these studies are next to meaningless. EDIT: By the way, Ok-Dragonfruity-1592, I can still see y…
/r/MensRights22/01/25 07:13 PM
1

a lot of the women who have gotten on board are unfortunately crazy leftists, who are only supporting this because they feel it strengthens their “pro-choice” stance I mean, they'd be hypocrites if they didn't.
/r/MensRights20/01/25 03:25 AM
24

Because they're horny, have no self-respect, and are conditioned to view women as victims who need their help with everything.
/r/MensRights20/01/25 01:58 AM
20

While the Male MC is the only guy who is 'respecting girls' and 'sees the female love interest for more than just her body and instead loves her personality'. It's also no coincidence that said male character is also the smartest, strongest, and most "deep" of all the male characters on the show, and when he displays toxic traits it's alright because he's got a "dark past that haunts him." Women like this hold attractive men to a completely different standard to everyone else.
/r/MensRights20/01/25 01:55 AM
42

Was thinking the same thing.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 08:31 PM
8

Many right-wring conservatives base their social stances on the traditional notion that women are weak and that it's up to strong, righteous men to protect them. In this vein, they derive their sense of masculinity and status from how useful and protective they are being to women. That's why you see so many "macho" men shit talk other men when they bring up double standards that disadvantage men. They're more interested in getting women and being seen as traditionally manly than in any kind of e…
/r/MensRights13/01/25 09:07 AM
5

His daughter has always been a influencer grifter riding his coattails anyway. Plus with his massive alt-right fan base it was only a matter of time before she linked up with an utter tool like Andrew Tate. Plenty of average, normal men out there felt that Peterson's simple "start by cleaning up your room" mantra resonated with them and helped lead them towards greater personal accountability. This side of what Peterson espouses, I've always been supportive of it. The other side of him? The one …
/r/MensRights13/01/25 09:04 AM
6

Right? 18-year-old girls are being groomed and conditioned by their friends to sell their bits on Onlyfans by the time they're right out of high school, yet THIS is what people consider "justice"?
/r/MensRights12/01/25 01:47 AM
10

There are so many reaches in this article, the author should dub themselves "stretch armstrong."
/r/MensRights04/01/25 08:24 AM
10

Not considering someone human is dehumanizing them.
/r/MensRights30/12/24 08:57 AM
1

Uhh . . . what?
/r/MensRights28/12/24 03:27 AM
1

Dude those guys know exactly what they're doing when they're wearing skimpy shit like that.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 03:15 AM
1

You aren't wrong, there certainly are
/r/MensRights28/12/24 03:04 AM
2

One thing I've never understood it how women are literally biological predisposed to feel colder in their extremities, due to their higher core temperatures. This is why women in offices spaces are usually the first ones to complain about it being too cold, and visa versa for men being too hot. So now this brings us to skimpy, skin-tight gym attire that is almost exclusively worn by women. Women talk about how they hate being objectified in the gym, yet simultaneously refuse the baggier or more …
/r/MensRights26/12/24 09:13 AM
2

Signing away half your retirement benefits to some rando you met within the last year ISN'T worth it.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 12:07 AM
40

The only time it's really worth it as a man is in one of two scenarios: 1) The man makes substantially less than the wife, in which case he'd make beaucoup alimony in the event of a divorce. Granted you're a gold-digging dirtbag if that's your sole reason for marriage (same as with any woman who does it). 2) A man has a wife and children he absolutely wants to make sure aren't screwed over in the event of his death. Marriage makes them the automatic inheritors of all his money, assets, and life …
/r/MensRights22/12/24 01:54 AM
11

I kind of want to go join that subreddit just so that I can get myself banned from it. Also, you should reply back with that exact phrase they gave you so you'll be unbanned.
/r/MensRights26/11/24 06:47 AM
1

Worth pointed out too that the only reason Brock Turner had that initial sentencing was because he came from a rich family who could afford a top shelf lawyer. Just another "affluenza" case.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 12:48 AM
413

if I were the guys kid, I'd honestly probably go through an entire arc where I grow up just with the sole purpose of emptying an entire magazine into that piece of shit officer.
/r/MensRights18/11/24 01:41 AM
23

Is there a joke or some kind of pop culture reference here I'm missing? Or is this just good old fashioned sexism?
/r/MensRights17/11/24 04:14 AM
12

Don't ever meet her alone. Ever. Save every text you get from her. If she starts spinning up lies then those will be useful. I'm not sure if your state is a two-party consent state when it comes to recording phone conversations. But if you're in a one-party state (only one person needs to be aware the call is being recorded), then record every phone conversation you have with her. Especially useful if you can get her to admit she threatened to accuse you of SA as a means to keep you away from yo…
/r/MensRights14/11/24 05:14 AM
4

The title of this sums up the entire problem. It shouldn't be focused on winning men, but on making life better for them in the same way they supposedly care about making life better for women. Men aren't some fickle rabble that you can just win over to your cause when it's convenient. They're real people with real concerns and real issues.
/r/MensRights13/11/24 08:30 AM
5

Guaranteed this person is on the payroll of some insurance conglomerate. The amusing things it that it's completely possible to put governors in the cars of every german citizen in order to limit the top speed. But these people don't actually care about speeding. They care about the insurance payouts.
/r/MensRights13/11/24 02:25 AM
71

While men and women both succumb to peer pressure in different ways, women are far* more susceptible to the threat of being socially ostracized. This is why they constantly resort to shaming tactics against men, and why it rarely seems to work.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 02:47 AM
1

That's like saying we aren't cutting off the breast, just the nipple. It's bodily mutilation being performed on a BABY.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 09:41 PM
5

You know they won't be.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 06:01 PM
2

Unnecessary. Just find a dapper chap who thinks you have pretty eyes and you're golden. #MANtrimony
/r/MensRights09/11/24 06:00 PM
2

Give me solid immigration and international trade policies and I'll vote for you in four years.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 05:51 PM
1

Bernie was probably as close as we could have expected. DNC wasn't having it though.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 05:49 PM
2

No doctor in the Western World would cut off a woman's clit if they cried "religious reasons." So I think we can all agree that bodily mutilation of children who can't consent is wrong. Boys deserve that same protection.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 05:44 PM
239

How tf does a high schooler groom another high schooler? And you guys are two* years apart? That's it? The grandmother is an absolute moron. It also blows my mind that someone can be labeled a sex offender of minors when both they and their partner are in high school.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 05:40 PM
2

You literally asked "who said men don't need any?" I answered your question.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 06:21 PM
3

Have you spent much time on the internet in the last two decades? Go to any leftist forum and try talking about how men have no reproductive rights. You'll have a wall of screeching feminists calling you an incel and saying that you should practice celibacy if you aren't ready to be a father. Yes, they literally use the oppressive social standard to which women used to be held, then unironically try to impose it on men.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 06:09 PM
13

Trump just won the popular vote partly because women turned out in unprecedented number to support him. You think they're out to take that away?
/r/MensRights08/11/24 07:57 AM
11

The problem is that legal paternal surrender isn't a thing and likely never will be. It's too convenient to have men subsidize the unilateral decisions of women so that the state doesn't have to.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 07:56 AM
69

This is pretty much it. They'll keep giving it up to the dudes they claim to hate (macho, cocky, fuckboys), meanwhile they'll treat the leftist nice guys like crap because they're the only one who will put up with it. I live in a leftist state, and leftist boyfriends are either generally dead inside with self-loathing or they're even more batshit than their girlfriend is.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 07:53 AM
25

Wouldst thou like to live HYPOCRITICALLY?"
/r/MensRights07/11/24 05:29 PM
1

I wish we were in public so I could slow clap this.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 07:21 AM
2

Bingo. The traditional "manly man" is really just a tool for the state and for women, defined solely by his utility to others. It's no more empowering than a woman being praised solely for her ability to churn out babies.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 07:16 AM
2

It's also no coincidence that the term "incel" started getting used more or less immediately after the 2016 election. Dems wasted no time creating their alt-right boogeyman in order to gaslight any man who disagreed with the mainstream feminist narratives.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 07:14 AM
6

Option 3 is really just a private way for you to verify. Then once you know it's not yours, you can find another legitimate way to challenge paternity. It's easier to double down in litigation if you know for sure you aren't the father.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 08:30 AM
4

Bruh, trying complaining on here about literally ANYTHING from the perspective of a man. You'll very quickly have people coming out of the word work to tell you how women have it harder, your struggles are your own faults because men have all the power, you're just a whiny incel, etc.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 01:25 AM
1

Slavers didn't hate black people. But they sure as hell didn't respect them or value them beyond anything other than simple tools of labor. Hatred isn't necessary for one group to treat another like crap.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 07:55 AM
104

There is no candidate that's best FOR men's rights. No candidate will ever make that their platform. The closest you'll come is a candidate that doesn't seek to advance women at the expense of men (ie affirmative action and DEI policies).
/r/MensRights26/10/24 06:26 PM
11

"Partners" can mean casual partners. So you have 80% of women only interested in the top 20% of guys. Simple numbers is that the 20% of guys have partners, and lots of them. The average man has none.
/r/MensRights24/10/24 02:17 AM
36

Oh you're wanted, as silent, obedient "allies."
/r/MensRights21/10/24 11:21 PM
1

That's a convenient way to claim that women aren't in power even when they literally are the ones in power.
/r/MensRights17/10/24 04:29 PM
39

This. The kind of people who quibble over referring to females as female aren't the kind of people you're ever going to be able to fully appease or satisfy. Biological reality doesn't matter to them anyway. it's all just a label they want to claim.
/r/MensRights17/10/24 05:49 AM
14

But if men are the ones with supposedly fragile egos, shouldn't kings be the one inciting war to prove themselves? This article also clarifies that queen's were more likely to be attacked than kings when single, but were more likely TO attack than kings when married. Pretty much in line with what the article says. Unmarried queen's are seen as easier conquests, but married queen's are more warlike because they know their husband and allies would support them. https://www.iq.harvard.edu/files/iqs…
/r/MensRights16/10/24 04:05 AM
15

I feel like everyone who stayed to fight in Ukraine should be free of taxes for the rest of their lives, in addition to special social services to help them recover. Let all the folks who fled pay for the cushy lifestyles of everyone who put their life on the line, willingly or unwillingly.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 04:35 PM
12

Jesus that's disgusting. I can't even imagine the sheer amount of confirmation bias that went into the writing of that.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 04:32 PM
16

Typical vet wife that views her husband's sacrifice as "her service."
/r/MensRights15/10/24 04:30 PM
2

Well, Mr. Bancroft says that these men, who often have their feelings easily hurt, are actually manipulating women with those hurt feelings. Honestly sounds like she's just describing stereotypical female behavior. Weaponizing your hurt feelings to manipulate your partner is something so many men have experienced from their female partner at some point in their relationship.
/r/MensRights10/10/24 02:23 PM
2

"Incel" is just a meaningless term used to gaslight men into silence. "He's upset about something, he must hate women." "He's upset about something, must be because he just can't get laid." It's just a tool women use to shut men up.
/r/MensRights09/10/24 04:09 PM
3

It's not about sick days. It's about how men literally do get worse symptoms than women when we get sick, due to our different immune response.
/r/MensRights09/10/24 04:34 AM
3

Very likely. As a guy, I don't even mention being sick until it's literally too bad that I can't work normally. "Feeling slightly under the weather" isn't something most guys do. We're either well enough to work or we're "really fucking sick." So from women's perspective, every time a man gets sick, it looks like we're being dramatic. But that's only because we generally never complain about the tiny colds.
/r/MensRights09/10/24 04:33 AM
3

According to an embarrassing number of people, the exception now disproves the norm.
/r/MensRights09/10/24 04:28 AM
1

They can't help the bleeding. But I'll never excuse a woman for being too weak to open a jar. It's 100% their fault if they refuse to ever do anything physical and consequently are rail thin and weaker than a prepubescent boy.
/r/MensRights09/10/24 04:27 AM
5

I'm not kidding when I say that your colleague (and you for that matter) could file for sexual harassment and win overnight. Making any kind of sexual reference to a coworker like that and spreading it around the office is no joke. Minimum that chick could get fired and maximum your company might be on the hook for compensation of some kind, considering no one else stopped her from doing it or talked to her about it after.
/r/MensRights09/10/24 04:25 AM
7

How about the fact that a woman can literally put any man's name on a birth certificate and he's automatically liable for support, along with recompense for any other benefits the mother applies for? Even better? If paternity is called into question, BOTH parents must agree to a DNA test being conducted on the child's blood. The father can't ask for one by himself on suspicion the woman is lying. This automatically forces the supposed father to enter into court proceedings and ask a judge to com…
/r/MensRights09/10/24 04:14 AM
13

It's good to share boy's problems but talking about it overly has even led to a few people thinking boys are dumb and pathetic losers, or that even girls are superior to boys. Anyone stupid enough to believe that isn't going to be convinced otherwise one way or the other. Hell, they're likely the same people with pre-existing biases towards boys, just like the teachers who give unfair marks.
/r/MensRights09/10/24 03:55 AM
12

They arguably deserve it far more than most "asylum seekers" whose countries just have shit economies.
/r/MensRights07/10/24 06:44 AM
11

So Russian men decide they DON'T want to support an authoritarian war-mongering state, and the EU's response is to say "uhh no, go back and be our enemy instead"?
/r/MensRights07/10/24 06:44 AM
21

mostly for cis women to virtue signal and cosplay as being gay Can we rope the non-binary chicks into this category?
/r/MensRights03/10/24 02:53 PM
2

"Nearly a decade"? Was the writer born ten years ago?
/r/MensRights01/10/24 07:15 PM
14

In instances where a m/f couple commits a crime, the woman nearly always gets off easier because she's an accomplice or because she claims she was under duress.
/r/MensRights30/09/24 02:55 AM
96

Was just about to post on this! An excerpt: It was forced to shut in May when one affected patron sued the gallery for gender discrimination and won. But on Friday, Tasmanian Supreme Court Justice Shane Marshall found that men could be excluded from the Ladies Lounge, because the law allows for discrimination if it promotes “equal opportunity” for a marginalised group. It's amazing how explicit they can be about discriminating against one group in order to advance another.
/r/MensRights27/09/24 04:31 PM
2

Parents, let this be a lesson. If you're on you're way out, sign over your holdings BEFORE you pass. For example, I co-own everything my dad owns that it valuable. When he eventually passes (heaven hope that's a long-ass time from now), no one else will have control over them. Not his ex-wife, not her kids who chose to be estranged from him, no one but me. Don't leave it up to biased courts to decide what happens with YOUR hard-earned assets.
/r/MensRights26/09/24 05:28 PM
4

I am extremely suspicious of that ever being an excuse for bad behavior The thinking behind this is that adults overlooking the reckless/aggressive behavior of boys when they're young, without disciplining them or restricting their behavior, leads to adult men that don't know how to moderate their aggressive behavior. There IS a grain of psychological truth to this, but this isn't the meaning of "boys will be boys."
/r/MensRights26/09/24 04:41 PM
19

True. The origin of the idiom also isn't English, but Latin. The term "boy" was originally rendered as "child." So the phrase really is saying that "kids will do stupid things." It has nothing to do with boys, specifically.
/r/MensRights26/09/24 04:14 PM
55

Statistics in education have shown for a while now that young girls get punished far less severely for the same offenses in school. So if anyone is getting taught from a young age that the rules don't apply to them, it's girls. From our earliest years, boys are getting set up to fail, while girls thrive in a system that generally caters to their learning style. https://www.seattletimes.com/education-lab/same-behavior-problems-hinder-boys-more-than-girls/
/r/MensRights26/09/24 03:31 PM
7

Absolutely agree. They deserve basic respect and decency like any other person who works a job.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 04:33 PM
4

Lawyer up, don't contact her ever again or she'll file harassment/stalking charges against you and it will look worse. The evidence (or lack thereof) is on your side. Rape is incredibly difficult to prove (this obviously works against victims frequently as well), and in this case that's to your benefit. You didn't do anything wrong, and having consensual sex with someone isn't a crime. Just let your lawyer do the talking and you'll be fine. Be extra conscious of any actions your college takes ag…
/r/MensRights25/09/24 03:53 PM
67

Other words, "I marketed myself as an object, then was surprised when people treated me like one."
/r/MensRights25/09/24 03:49 PM
3

I've spoken to quite a few self-described feminists over the years who readily support changes that help men in the way women have been helped over the last few decades. Things like boys failing/not finishing school/college at rates in line with women, suicides overwhelmingly being men, the draft, etc. Plenty of women out there see them as a problem just like MRA's do. So I honestly agree in the assessment that the average feminist is likely really just a woman who is egalitarian but who probabl…
/r/MensRights23/09/24 02:55 PM
16

Oh cool. There was a long stretch where it seemed like Karen rarely appeared in their videos anymore. It was mainly Prim and Hannah guest starring.
/r/MensRights22/09/24 07:02 PM
45

For those who didn't bother starting the video, the creator, Allison, has been a men's rights activist for many years now. If you've ever heard of Karen Straughn (famous Canadian MRA), they used to do videos together.
/r/MensRights22/09/24 05:58 PM
2

Never stops being funny how the first thing some people do is imply the only reason a man has a dissenting opinion MUST be because he can't get laid. XD Don't worry, I'm doing just fine, buddy.
/r/MensRights19/09/24 05:47 PM
37

Supposedly doctors are much less likely to take the complaints of female patients seriously. Granted, the easy explanation for this is that women are much more likely to go to the doctor and complain about literally everything that bothers them physically, whereas men will usually hold off until they're either dying or having something about to fall off. So doctors don't have to question it when a man complains about pain or weird sensations. So it's definitely a double standard, but one that is…
/r/MensRights18/09/24 06:11 AM
462

Because women benefit from certain double standards which have existed for so long that society doesn't see them as a double standard at all. Tell a man to be celibate if he doesn't want to be a father equals putting the patriarchy in its place. Tell a women to be celibate if she doesn't want to be a mother equals female oppression. The amusing thing is that ALL the men I talk to don't want be ability to keep a woman from having an abortion. What they want is to not be held accountable for a cho…
/r/MensRights18/09/24 12:22 AM
2

ask for a raise and justify it. If hey say no, ask why. what have you not done that your co-workers​​​ have? don't even phrase it like a gender thing, because that will just put them on the defensive. start looking for another job immediately and get a good idea of the range that other companies are offering for your position. you almost always lose out on salary gains if you stay in one job too long, because your position tends to lag behind market demands until it needs to be filled by a new p…
/r/MensRights14/09/24 01:54 AM
4

"Emotional labor" isn't a thing. Everyone deals with stress. Men just consider it part of life.
/r/MensRights08/09/24 08:03 AM
6

As far as what the articles are saying, the father was the one who bought him the weapon and who was instrumental in basically assuring the police that the boy wasn't a problem, after all the threats he made previously. So he got the boy a weapon and kept law enforcement from spotting a likely shooter when all the signs were there. I support tearing down double standards, but the the dad is CLEARLY the one who enabled the boy to do what he did.
/r/MensRights08/09/24 08:02 AM
5

Or how women always have some brother, father, cousin, whoeverthefuck waiting in the wings to threaten physical violence to any man that breaks her heart. Yes, a women's emotional state is worth more than a man's literal physical safety.
/r/MensRights08/09/24 07:58 AM
1

The obvious answer here is that gas hasn't been a major threat to our forces in a long time. And even in the few cases it has, we expected it an planned accordingly. If we fight an enemy known to use gas as a weapon, we can shave. Otherwise there's no purpose in being clean shaven all the time. Don't even get me started on the idiocy of being "gas mask ready" when we're stateside. It's just another random thing for old crusty leaders to hem young soldiers up over.
/r/MensRights30/08/24 08:08 PM
1

If the boy is underage and he's raped by a presumably adult woman, no he wouldn't go to jail. HOWEVER, if she got pregnant by him, he'd be on the hook for child support once he turned 18. Here's an article with a number of such cases in the US as well. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/09/02/statutory-rape-victim-child-support/14953965/
/r/MensRights30/08/24 07:24 PM
5

The secret of so-called "equity" programs is that they don't boost female recruitment in male-heavy professions. They just reduce male recruitment until the numbers are equal. So to get to 50% women in a given profession, they have to actively discriminate against a significant number of male applicants.
/r/MensRights30/08/24 06:07 PM
1

You do realize the overwhelming majority of jobs in the military don't involve direct physical combat, right? Why should the military handicap its numbers by cutting out 51% of the US population when they could fill a wide variety of roles?
/r/MensRights30/08/24 06:04 PM
1

I always loved that movie, because you had a mentally tough woman who wanted to prove she was able to do one of the toughest male jobs. Even the other female politicians in the film saw it as nothing more than a publicity stunt, but the main character committed to following the exact same standards as the men. It's a shame that example didn't catch on in the US military.
/r/MensRights30/08/24 06:01 PM
1

Except that you have literal Special Forces, the most combat-saturated units in the entire US military, who have beards and long hair. So if gas masks and long hair aren't an issue for people in their circumstances, it's nonsensical to claim it's an issue for the rest of the service.
/r/MensRights30/08/24 05:50 PM
1

At the very least, I'd say women should get buzz cuts in basic training just like the men do. The entire purpose of it is to help shave away your civilian identity and make you a soldier. What does that say about the women going through basic if the military never forces them to abandon their own vanity for three months?
/r/MensRights30/08/24 05:47 PM
2

It absolutely is, and there's no sound argument that it isn't. Women can even use crap like lipstick and colored nail polish in uniform while men can't. How the hell is that supposed to enhance combat readiness or quality of life? It isn't. It's just a gimme that they gave to women so they could recruit more women to the military.
/r/MensRights30/08/24 05:46 PM
8

I mean this IS literally the country that only defines rape as forcible penetration by a penis. Men can only be victims of other men, never women. Pretty convenient for all those female predators who can't seem to stop preying on young boys.
/r/MensRights28/08/24 04:43 AM
4

Honestly this approach is in line with how women, as a general whole, operate in a social setting to solve problems. When solving problems, they don't take personal responsibility to solve or neutralize the problem. Instead they reach out to others in order to generate collective action/outrage, so "the group" can fix the problem for her. Men on the other hand are raised with the expectation that real men solve their own problems, because you simply can't rely on others to do it for you or even …
/r/MensRights27/08/24 05:03 AM
1

My point was in response to your assertion that women have it different because they're more likely to have stalkers. My addition to that is that women tend to have stalkers because because of their specific reactions to threats. it's also again worth pointing out that men are more likely to be the victims of violent crime. That also tells me that women's feeling of security is not in proportion to their likelihood of experiencing violent crime.
/r/MensRights26/08/24 04:25 AM
1

Being frank, wearing headphones, looking at your phone, things that make you look like you aren't paying attention, etc. . . those make you a bigger target. People that look alert and don't shy from momentary eye contact (don't stare at people, obviously) are less likely to be mugged.
/r/MensRights25/08/24 07:54 PM
1

There's a Roman proverb: "opportunity makes the thief." I think this also applies to this discussion. Women are considered easy targets, not because they're smaller or weaker (small men aren't considered easy targets), but because most of them don't know how to channel aggression and ATTACK. When it comes to "fly, fight, or freeze" women tend to run or freeze up, both of which predators are prepared for.
/r/MensRights25/08/24 07:36 PM
34

It never stops being amusing when women say things like "men don't have to worry about feeling unsafe walking home at night." Like excuse me, I'm more likely to be the victim of violent crime than you are.
/r/MensRights25/08/24 07:28 PM
17

I'd say the primary difference between men and women is that men understand and accept that self-defense is a personal responsibility. Society is not going to be there to save you when someone jumps out of the dark at you. Just because men accept this doesn't mean we magically feel safe. Hell most men I know are VERY threat aware when we're walking alone at night. It just means we don't see feeling unsafe as some societal problem, but rather the nature of walking alone in an isolated area at nig…
/r/MensRights25/08/24 07:25 PM
10

Totally agree. It goes both ways. I think it just gets highlighted on the female side more because the "division of labor" almost always seems to focus on work INSIDE the house. Work outside the house frequently is outsourced to specialists and contractors, so it often gets not factored in, even though the man is frequently the one paying for it.
/r/MensRights04/08/24 08:09 PM
75

I think a large part of the idea that men "expect"women to handle certain chores stems from the following scenario: A chore needs doing, but man and woman disagree on when and how. Women usually wants it done sooner and to more intensive standards. Because man didn't see chore as worth doing yet or to a certain standard, woman decides to just do it herself because it would bother her to wait longer or accept the way he does it. Man accepts this and woman now routinely does that chore. Woman now …
/r/MensRights04/08/24 05:40 PM
5

I'd also leave him off the birth certificate. If the mother decides to keep the baby and then later ends up on welfare, the dad can be on the hook to the state for child support, regardless of whether or not she asks him for it.
/r/MensRights02/07/24 05:15 AM
1

I second this. Get the video evidence and have the cops get involved. This might seem dramatic, but you could have died from a hit like that, especially if you blacked out and fell to the ground and hit your head.
/r/MensRights18/06/24 04:06 AM
1

Army here, no they don't. Stop spewing nonsense. The only posts that allow junior enlisted to move off-post are those that are lacking in barracks accommodations. Aside from that you nearly always have to be married or a single parent.
/r/MensRights04/06/24 03:53 AM
2

This is really it. If you aren't an idiot and take advantage of everything the military has to offer (college, certifications, rank advancement, etc.) then you WILL be solidly middle class with a retirement in your late THIRTIES. People live to their nineties now. That's 2/3 of your life with a decent paycheck that never stops coming. As a veteran, you're also entitled to the VA home loan program, with zero percent down and competitive interest rates.
/r/MensRights04/06/24 03:49 AM
1

I imagine most of those are just trash accounts that don't do regular content. I'd like to see the figures for people who post weekly content.
/r/MensRights04/06/24 03:44 AM
1

"men tend to be selfish and use women to move forward in their careers" In what way does any woman help a man move forward in his career? If anything, single men tend to advance further in their careers because they don't have a woman competing for his time.
/r/MensRights01/06/24 07:11 PM
2

I'm definitely not downvoting you, and it's perfectly fair to ask for sources if someone make claims. This is a fairly recent study, but there are plenty of others that have been done over the years. https://ifstudies.org/blog/better-educated-women-still-prefer-higher-earning-husbands This one talks about the idea that high-earning men are seen as valuable, even across various income and education levels. Though it's worth pointing out that higher-educated women don't value a man's salary QUITE …
/r/MensRights27/05/24 11:11 PM
1

My point wasn't that there isn't an earnings gap t that any such earnings gap is the result of a mixture of personal choice and selection bias. Moving on to the latter point, I'm not going to discount your anecdotal experience, but statistics indicate the opposite on the whole. it's worth pointing out that perhaps you associate with the type of women that don't focus on that sort of thing, creating an inherent selection bias both in your friends and in the type of partners your friends go after.…
/r/MensRights27/05/24 10:52 PM
31

Excet that the majority of working women in urban areas outearn their male peers. The majority of the working population is in cities. Ergo, the majority of young work men earn less and aren't desirable bachelors. The average woman working full time works less hours than men. Roughly 8 hours per week, in fact. That easily accounts for any hourly earnings gap. Salay gaps come down to negotiation and frequency of job changes, neither of which women favor.
/r/MensRights27/05/24 12:10 AM
2

Honestly I'd copy down this policy and post it anonymously on the internet for all to see. They'll get called out pretty quickly for discriminatory practices. Harassment is harassment. Period.
/r/MensRights26/05/24 07:15 PM
164

Men are super easy to win over if you're even a halfway attractive woman. It's not porn that's driving male loneliness, but rather female hypergamy. Women are going to college and making lots of money at unprecedented rates. Statistics show that women at every income and education level prefer men who earn more money than they do. By simple math*, that means that if the average woman makes more money than the average man, then most men simply aren't eligible bachelors in their eyes.
/r/MensRights26/05/24 07:13 PM
24

The military is having a historically-low period of recruitment. So it's definitely not the military. I think men are just realizing that college is a waste for the majority of degrees. Even computer people can just take certificate programs and make good money in half the time it takes to get a BS, for a quarter the cost.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 07:45 PM
7

Women judge most men by the actions of the best and worst. They hold the top tier men as the standard, which is why most women aren't interested in "average" men for dating purposes. They also hold the worst men as what average looks like. So if you're not a 10/10 top tier man, you're basically a creep in their eyes by default.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 07:36 PM
10

That now has carried over into the field of psychology, with male behavior being seen as emotionally stunted compared to the uncorked emotional vomit that women prefer.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 07:34 PM
17

Very true. Most things women complain about are behaviors I've seen so many women exhibit over the years. Objectification? Ever seen how women act when talking about dudes like Chris Hemsworth? Don't even get me started on what women do to men when they think they can get away with it. Good ol'boys club? Ever seen how women act in the office, with their networks of "empowered women in the workplace"? Violence against partners? Statistics already proved that women are the large majority of unilat…
/r/MensRights25/05/24 07:32 PM
3

The key clarification that needs to (apparently) be made to most people is that being anti-feminist isn't the same as being anti-woman. Nor does it mean that being anti-feminist means being anti-women's rights. Like jesus christ ladies, most of us aren't trying to send you back to the kitchen, barefoot and pregnant. We just want to live our lives without society shortchanging us so others can advance (preferential hiring to women) or discriminating against us in the legal system (eg. prison sent…
/r/MensRights17/05/24 03:56 PM
2

Wikipedia is an open source encyclopedia that ANYONE can edit. Not much of a surprise that a bunch of butthurt feminists go on there and add misogyny to the list of attributes.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 03:51 PM
2

sure there are. But they aren't the majority by any stretch
/r/MensRights12/05/24 10:21 PM
6

Many women mistake "adherence to social norms and pressures" as maturity. They care about appearance, whereas most guys don't give a shit past a certain point.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 09:12 PM
3

That's your own standard though. Your partner isn't obligated to share it.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 09:11 PM
5

"Some men purposefully do a shitty job cleaning" It's also possible that they clean to their own standard and women don't like it. So it's a "shitty job."
/r/MensRights12/05/24 09:09 PM
9

Now translate this attitude to the workplace and certain things start to make sense.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 09:08 PM
7

We had a split sink and I straight up banned her from using the right side, because otherwise she's fill it with her pots and I couldn't ever do my own dishes.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 09:06 PM
13

"I used to leave a spotless house for a 10 hour day of work (including the commute), only to come home to a house that looked like a tornado went through it and a pissed off girlfriend who wanted help to clean up her mess." This was my last relationship to a tee. I did dishes and wiped up counters right after I used them most days. But of course, whenever it's Sunday and time to clean up the kitchen, whose mess do you think I'm being expected to contribute 50% to clean? Hers.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 09:05 PM
11

I'm pretty convinced at this point that what you describe is the reason for the whole "women do so much unpaid housecleaning labor" concept. Women project their own cleaning standards onto men and then resent men for not adhering to them, without ever considering what HIS baseline concept of cleanliness is.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 08:57 PM
1

You couldn't say the same for women and fear of men. Women's fear of men has nothing to do with the actual threat of a man. Women are just scared of everything, whereas men are actually likely to get attacked by men they get in heated arguments with, and no one will help you in public.
/r/MensRights28/02/24 07:49 AM
4

I normally have a live and let live view of people using/making porn. But I hate how OF has basically validated women treating men like ATM's while they get to buy a home at the age of 18-20 for doing nothing but show tits.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 01:14 AM
4

I agree with this. Feminists need men to do the hard labor that allows their echo chamber of a life to persist. Red pillers can just do their own thing until a more traditional woman wanders into their life and offers something real like a good partner to have kids with.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 01:12 AM
2

The main problem with women's preconceptions about red-pilled men is that they largely stem from what OTHER WOMEN tell them to think. These other women paraphrase and misrepresent what red-pill pundits actually say much of the time. This is how you get BS like "pewdipie is a white supremacist" or "JK Rowling hates trans people." It's all reactionary garbage stirred up by people who don't want you to have an opinion of your own, so they get other women stirred up with lies.
/r/MensRights18/02/24 09:56 PM
28

If "having no self-respect" means dating someone below the top 90% of men, then yeah I guess you're right.
/r/MensRights17/02/24 02:13 AM
33

If modern women didn't have men to complain about, they'd have no identity at all. Men have hobbies and interests that they're passionate about. They joke with each other, have friends, do projects. Women seem to just go through life finding ways to complain about things and then tie those things back to men.
/r/MensRights17/02/24 01:48 AM
39

"Acceptable" dick is entirely subjective to the woman. They might not like their choices, but that doesn't mean they don't have many.
/r/MensRights17/02/24 01:22 AM
90

Exactly. "Single" for women just means "not monogamous but still getting sex and dates whenever I want it."
/r/MensRights16/02/24 09:08 PM
13

People with no self-respect look to sycophants for approval. That's why OF creators think what they do is a flex.
/r/MensRights15/02/24 05:20 AM
54

Spot on. Here's how it likely goes for women like OP describes: Girl starts OF and (if she's halfway attractive) makes good money in no time. Immediately starts realizing that no one is buying her "content creator" job title as anything respectable or desirable in a partner. Copes with feelings of shame/regret by externalizing feelings onto men, accusing them of insecurity at the idea of a woman out-earning them. It the end though, she's getting far too little attention from the men she wants an…
/r/MensRights15/02/24 05:19 AM
16

And giving just a straight answer takes less effort than adding passive-aggressive snark at the end. Yet here we both are.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 03:01 AM
14

It's not his job to google why a doctor/nurse tells him to do something. He's entitled to ask the purpose of any instruction they give him, since they're supposed to be the experts. The nurse either didn't know the answer (which means she's a poor nurse), or she was just being an ass to you.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 02:48 AM
1

American women who bitch about this.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 04:39 AM
6

It might not be the sole metric. But if everyone hates the manager, that is most certainly going to impact motivation and performance. No one can please everyone, but most of your workers should feel generally positive about you if you're a fair and effective leader.
/r/MensRights30/01/24 02:18 AM
11

Or height shaming, or dick shaming, or ick/creep shaming, or calling them in incels . . .
/r/MensRights29/01/24 10:16 PM
24

"Incel" is the weirdest insult in our era. Our society spends all this effort to remove the stigma of women sleeping with whoever they want, and usually only the top 10% of men, and yet they turn it around and shame all the other men for not getting laid.
/r/MensRights29/01/24 10:13 PM
18

I think about this every time women complain about people not liking female bosses because people perceive it as bitchy or domineering. I'm like "no, you're just a poor leader and don't have the self-awareness to recognize it." I've had just as many poor male managers as women. The difference is that women blame sexism for people not liking their leadership style. Men just accept it and go, "oh well, I don't care if everyone likes me."
/r/MensRights29/01/24 10:10 PM
2

Birth control is not just the woman's responsibility, you should take steps too especially since nothing is 100%. Also, if you haven't already, get yourself checked as you never know. You're under no legal obligation, that's great. The moral one is on you to handle though. If a man lies about having a vasectomy, a woman can sue him for rape. You're damn right it's rape the other way around.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 07:35 AM
3

It's true, actually. If a man lied about having a vasectomy, a women could absolutely take him to court over getting her pregnant. Fuck women who lie about being on birth control, but like don't LITERALLY fuck them, okay?
/r/MensRights24/01/24 07:34 AM
1

You didn't ask for this, and I promise that staying around for the sake of the child will make you miserable because of the fact that you'll always need to do it at the whims of the mother. Tell her you're leaving and do it NOW. With any luck, she'll get an abortion when she realizes you're serious and won't be trapped into a relationship with her.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 07:30 AM
2

Women already do the former, as is their right. The second case isn't even an issue in the United States as far as I know, unless you wanna provide statistics on that.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 05:37 AM
15

you're incentivizing avoiding being a part of your kid's life by allowing dudes to keep their money No, it's incentivizing mom's to think twice about choosing to get pregnant from a guy they can't financially and legally trap. Men opting out of fatherhood they never agreed to in the first place isn't a problem to begin with.
/r/MensRights22/01/24 11:22 PM
26

Easy solution: Legalize abortion in all states. Sorry pro-lifers, I agree that it's killing a human life, but we're just gonna have to bite the bullet with this one. Abolish child support for any children resulting from a pregnancy to which the father didn't consent. (Children born from mutually consensual pregnancy still receive support in the event of a separation.) Women now have to choose between two paths: Get pregnant without the father's consent and have NO entitlement to any financial su…
/r/MensRights22/01/24 11:17 PM
5

Didn't mean to invalidate your experience, by the way. Only wanted to highlight that it's different for everyone, even if there are trends in the larger scale.
/r/MensRights19/12/23 07:48 AM
3

Pretty standard honestly. Abusive men don't usually tolerate women who hit back, so most female victims will simply cower rather than escalate. But women who strike first will likely push many men to push/shove/smack them in return, leading to bi-directionality.
/r/MensRights19/12/23 07:43 AM
7

Nearly everyone who has abused me (without punishment, I might add) has been a woman.
/r/MensRights19/12/23 07:42 AM
4

"A final analysis examined the association between dominance by one partner and partner violence perpetrated against a partner in dating samples using data from the IDVS. Male dominance scores were not found to be predictive of male partner violence perpetration; however, female dominance scores explained 47% of the variance of female partner violence perpetration. " ​ This is really telling. Men in the dominant positions are no more likely to be violent than any other. Yet dominant women are fa…
/r/MensRights19/12/23 07:37 AM
15

And yet you're willing to mess with your endocrine system potentially resulting in long term consequences such as truly permanent infertility and even death to hope for a "reversible" hormonal birth control for men. Who's "you" in this example? I'm not getting a vasectomy nor putting my faith in an experimental hormone altering drug.
/r/MensRights19/12/23 04:26 AM
23

1/10 failure rate is not in any way good in the medical field, especially for something as significant as your ability to have children.
/r/MensRights19/12/23 03:58 AM
0

That has nothing to do with academia and everything to do with a shortage of men in the field and a female-centric model for analyzing emotions and behavior.
/r/MensRights29/11/23 03:33 AM
2

Democrats are pro establishment and Republicans are pro corporations. Neither give two lonely sh*ts about men's issues.
/r/MensRights27/11/23 10:36 AM
0

The problem with censoring MRA forums is that when you eventually DO get a niche board that survives, it invariably draws all the most extreme and vindictive members of the MRA community and concentrates them into an echo chamber. The only way to ensure true diversity of thought is that have ALL forums be 100% open. No more feminist boards in which any man who disagrees is permabanned for "harassment" and no MRA boards that jump down the throat of any woman with a dissenting opinion.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 12:26 AM
1

That's the reason for women dominating medicine, teaching sociology, languages, biology and chemistry first. Roughly 53% of medical students are female. That's hardly dominating, especially when you consider that men comprise 2/3 of physicians as of 2021. Again, same approximate representation, just coalesced in different areas of the field. Women are heavy in the middle jobs, men are more at the top in this case. Also I fail to see how biology and and chemistry have anything whatsoever to do wi…
/r/MensRights23/09/23 09:28 AM
2

Unless you work in a highly physical job, your physical weakness compared to men is in no way holding you back from competing with them.
/r/MensRights12/09/23 06:56 AM
4

Pretty much. Work sucks, so bragging back and forth with our friends about our little victories is both validating and motivating.
/r/MensRights12/09/23 06:55 AM
10

The casual bragging that guys do is generally just about getting validation and kudos, rather than any kind of ACTUAL competition. Men know this, because it's how we communicate. But I can see how it can seem competitive from the outside.
/r/MensRights12/09/23 06:47 AM
7

I firmly believe that the only people who truly hate women are . . . yeah, other women.
/r/MensRights12/09/23 05:43 AM
4

If patriarchy sucks for both men and women, then it's not a patriarchy. It's just society. Plus the only truly privileged people in society are rich people, i.e. <1% of men. Women can complain about how crappy women had it a century ago, but that's all it is, the past. Women today, in the first world at least, are the most privileged and protected class of people in existence. They're the beneficiaries of the majority of social welfare programs and affirmative action policies, despite overwhelmi…
/r/MensRights12/09/23 05:30 AM
7

I would even argue most men fall into that, I honestly never once thought about mens rights or the issues mens face until I was in my late 20s and how hypocritical society is towards men. The irony of using that as an insult is that it's basically ugly-shaming men for not being attractive to women. What happened to body positivity? Guess that's only for women and those who claim to be women. Same thing goes for the "probably lives in his mom's basement" insult. Notice how we never levee that ins…
/r/MensRights12/09/23 05:09 AM
2

The biggest problem with incels is that they get irate and actually try to engage with the crazy women who only spew ad hominems anyway. They'd be better served by just working on themselves and leaving the entire gender privilege debate behind. It's never productive for anyone.
/r/MensRights12/09/23 05:06 AM
2

So if I'm understanding this correctly: Your instagram is set to private, meaning only people you approve can see it. This girl's friend somehow gained viewing access to your instagram, which means: a) she's already on your approved followers list and just took a look at your page on behalf of this other girl, b) she looked at an archived version of your instagram from before you made it private, or c) she hacked into someone's account and viewed your content. If it's scenario a or b, that's a b…
/r/MensRights11/09/23 10:03 PM
1

One of the most liberating things to ever happen to me was the realization that you will never change the mind of these types of feminists. You'll never convince them are aren't part of the problem. You'll never convince them that the patriarchy doesn't exist. You'll never convince them that masculinity is healthy and it's only behavior that's toxic, behavior that's shared by both men and women. Now I just live my life and try to be the best version of myself.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 07:53 AM
0

Or the average 18-35 American woman . . .
/r/MensRights25/08/23 07:43 AM
3

One thing you can always be sure of in a debate about feminism, is that sooner or later someone will cry out with the "no true feminist" fallacy. You can list off a hundred different individuals and sects within feminism engaged in disgusting, toxic stuff that actively harms men in society, and it will be explained away with "oh but that wasn't REAL feminism, obviously."
/r/MensRights25/08/23 07:22 AM
3

these are a result of men preaching the power of masculinity as oppose to the passiveness of femininity which has resulted in men being incredibly persecuted under the patriarchy. Every time I see feminist complaining about the lack of female CEO's, I think: Go start a company. Oh, you don't wanna do that? Okay, work 80+ hours a week and be an absolute money-driven sociopath. Oh what's that? You want work/life balance? Good luck with that.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 07:14 AM
4

If a society heavily disadvantages the overwhelming majority of men and women, with only a slant <1% of men at the top reaping the rewards, it's not a patriarchy. It's an aristocracy.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 07:07 AM
1

"TLDR; mensrights seems to present itself as a ‘men have it bad too!’ Movement rather than a movement with any real goal, " There are plenty of MRA's out there lobbying for actual change to the issues that affect men. Their words just tend to either fall on deaf ears, or get drowned out by the "women have it worse" crowd. Look up any thread on this site relating to paternity fraud, conscription, insurance discrimination, double standards in dating, legal/criminal bias against men, etc. and you'l…
/r/MensRights25/08/23 07:05 AM
1

Anywhere is better than less-developed countries. Compare the US to other first world countries and it doesn't look so great. Lack of medicare, sky-rocketing housing prices, and salaries that are years behind inflation all make it harder than in any other developed nation to have a home and raise a family. But hey, at least a few sigma grindset sigma-alpha-zulu males can work hard and maybe become millionaires with lambo's and youtube channels.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 06:42 AM
1

Except for Seattle. It really IS worse here because of the gender imbalance caused by Amazon/Google/Microsoft importing tens of thousands of mostly male tech workers from other states. Women here are the most entitled and feminist of any state I've ever visited, including California. Oh, and they totally f***ed the housing markets, so good luck following the normal pipeline of college-job for a few years-buy house-acquire family. When my dad was my age, he was able to afford a house ten years ea…
/r/MensRights25/08/23 06:38 AM
1

Someone once told me that landlords are actually providing a good public service, because they provide housing opportunities to people who can't afford to buy one. I honestly was flabbergasted at how someone can be so smug yet so devoid of rational thought.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 06:30 AM
6

Agreed. There's definitely state-supported legal inequality, especially in family court, but that's not the same thing as being oppressed.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 07:10 PM
9

Ever notice how women hate when men call them words like "sweetie, cutie, hon, etc." but as soon as you disagree with them about something, they give you that smug demeanor and start giving you the "Oh sweetie, who hurt you? Educate yourself because I don't have time to."
/r/MensRights28/04/22 07:09 PM
11

They think so resolutely that they're in the right that anyone who disagrees with them SURELY is simply hurt and emotionally acting out. The utter arrogance.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 07:08 PM
7

The best part is they don't even risk anything to get it. They just complain loudly enough until white men give them what they want. White women never had to get into mass fights with police or attack government offices to assert their civil rights the way black people have. What's even more hilarious is that women's rights followed shortly after the rights of the average American male achieve recognized basic voting rights. Except women didn't even need to register for the draft in order to get…
/r/MensRights28/04/22 07:06 PM
11

Every time I hear women talk about how oppressed they are, it's always about how they don't "feel" welcome in male spaces or about how society made them "feel" growing up. It's never about what's ACTUALLY denied to women, which is pretty much nothing at this point.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 07:03 PM
8

Until the support networks for these sole parent families get to a point where it can actually support these children sure Easy to justify since it's 100% the woman's fault for having a kid she couldn't support. Violating men's parental and financial autonomy because women can't control themselves isn't fair or just.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 06:59 PM
7

Easy solution: 1) Make birth control widely legal and free. (pro-lifers have to bite the bullet on this one, sorry) 2) Assume any birth is going to be aborted unless otherwise agreed-upon. 3) If a child IS born (100% woman's choice and responsibility), it is then up to the man if he wants to assume both parental and financial responsibility. 4) If a man and woman agree beforehand that they want to have a baby (via some kind of legal agreement), the man is completely jointly liable, even if he ch…
/r/MensRights28/04/22 06:57 PM
-5

This reminds of of that period a few years back when liberals were talking about "respecting" middle eastern culture. You know, the cultural that ACTUALLY is a patriarchy, unlike the egalitarian paradise we live in here in the West.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 06:50 PM
1

I'm of the opinion now that many feminist white women subconsciously view minorities as a weapon to wield against white men. They lump themselves in with the oppressed, so they can then freely throw ideological punches at white men with impunity. Seems to have worked so far, considering that white women receive the bulk of all Affirmative Action benefits.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 06:44 PM
1

I'm a white dude who grew up off-and-on homeless, surrounded by addicts, wearing thrift store clothes, and the cheapest food you can imagine. It never ceases to amuse me when pampered, middle-class white women who had daddy pay for their college smugly "educate" me about my white male privilege.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 06:42 PM
1

Women cause inceldom on their own. It's literally in the title, "INVOLUNTARY celibate." Women create incels by being hyper-selective and only going after the top 10% of men. Most incels will never become misogynists though.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 06:37 PM
2

Exactly. Most feminist articles these days don't seem to be about encouraging women to venture into new areas and try new things, but to criticize men for making women "not feel welcome in male-dominated spaces." It's utter BS, because women view any space with a male majority as being "dominated" by men. That has nothing to do with men and everything to do with cowardly women not having the willpower to pick a career and do it without having the office softly encourage them.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 06:35 PM
3

The primary pitfall of feminist thinking is that even if women achieve absolute parity and equality in all things tomorrow, there will STILL be unquantifiable effects of generations of women having lived under the so-called patriarchy. TLDR: women will always be victims, even when they aren't, or even when they're in a superior position.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 06:32 PM
0

Research has shown that the reason women GENERALLY aren't as violent isn't because they're more gentle, but because they're more afraid of consequences. Mind you, this disappears when it involves people they AREN'T afraid of, like children or men whom they know won't hit back. ​ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3826207/
/r/MensRights28/04/22 06:28 PM
2

other taking away all of your rights as a father taking away your children is the most violent act I can imagine. I can endure every other type of violence if it meant that I could be a father. And they top it off with the equivalent of indentured servitude:a modern form of slavery!!!! SMFH Every time I meet a person under 30 who spouts that venomous divisive BS, I just think "fuck your feminist mother for screwing you up so badly."
/r/MensRights28/04/22 06:26 PM
2

Pretty typical. The "strong, empowered women" always seem to need big daddy government to make the people they don't like go away.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 06:24 PM
2

I can't imagine what she would have said if you dropped the bombshell on her that white women are the primary benefactors of affirmative action policies.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 03:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter