TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Extension-Moose-4662 Archive

View 0 posts and 257 comments by Extension-Moose-4662 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

I stand corrected. One woman. One woman in the history of the world has actually been prosecuted.
/r/MensRights16/03/24 01:05 AM
–

I feel for you. I really do. It’s a shame women have so many options to end their parental obligation and men have only one or two, at most (abstinence and condoms). But … If you decide to play Russian roulette with someone, you can’t say you didn’t consent to being shot, even if they told you they were all blanks, Mr. Baldwin. Yes, there absolutely should be a way for men to terminate their parental obligations, like women have, but there isn’t. So you know the rules going in and you bust your …
/r/MensRights15/03/24 03:18 PM
–

AFAIK there are already laws that cover things like stealthing, poking holes in condoms, coercive sex...and make them sexual assault. Maybe for men, but certainly not a crime for women. No woman will ever be prosecuted for poking holes in a condom. IMO when you have sex you consent to being a parent because you realize it's a possibility. I agree. And yet, women believe they have the right to have sex with impunity without consequences of a child if they don’t want one. Why doesn’t the same rule…
/r/MensRights15/03/24 03:07 PM
–

And women have the choice to keep their legs closed. Why does it have to come down to abortion?
/r/MensRights15/03/24 03:03 PM
–

Imagine someone saying such a thing to a pregnant woman.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 02:59 PM
–

Sex definitely causes chemical reactions in men’s bodies that are very addictive.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 11:01 PM
5

They do it because they’re starving … If only they knew about these things called jobs.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 10:59 PM
–

The real definition of woke is "aware of and actively attentive to important societal facts and issues". Fine, let’s accept that definition as a place to start. But it’s incomplete. Those “societal issues and facts” only involve defending the oppressed from their oppressors. And white straight men are defined as the oppressors in all cases. So while this subreddit is concerned with societal issues and facts, they are the wrong societal issues and facts to be considered woke.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 10:31 PM
–

Because frankly, having a day to celebrate half the world’s population is stupid and entirely unnecessary.
/r/MensRights11/03/24 12:57 AM
–

How many times have you heard of women saying "I can change him" or "I can change his mind" when they have been told point blank "we are not getting married, we are not bf/gf" That’s when they “forget” to take their pill.
/r/MensRights10/03/24 12:23 PM
3

Six feet tall, a six-pack and a six-figure salary…where many are also hoping their date is endowed with a trust fund, They always leave out the 4th requirement: six inches. A trust fund isn’t all the endowment they expect.
/r/MensRights10/03/24 12:22 PM
3

Usually followed on with claims of how men make sexist jokes about women all the time and women are simply expected to take it.. Except, women don’t take it. They don’t accept it at all and will get men fired over it. Either we all laugh at jokes or none of us do. You can’t have it both ways ladies.
/r/MensRights10/03/24 12:17 PM
7

Yes of course. The definition has expanded tremendously since Clarence Hill. I’m just saying that was the birthplace. That’s when most people became aware of it and there has followed a concerted push to make men feel guilty about it ever since then. You used to be able to tell dirty jokes casually, because you are all adults. Now you can’t because women are present. They said they didn’t want to change the workplace, just be accepted, then, like cuckoos, they made themselves at Home and started…
/r/MensRights08/03/24 09:59 PM
11

I remember it was the first time any of us has ever heard it pronounced ‘Harris-ment’ instead of ‘her ASS ment’
/r/MensRights08/03/24 03:16 PM
–

Well before then. Sexual harassment, in its current form, was birthed by Anita Hill in the 1990’s in the Clarence Thomas hearings. That began the expansion of the definition to include a “hostile work environment” which, as near as I can tell, means whatever the fuck the woman wants it to mean. Concurrent with this change has been the massive expansion of the definition of sexual assault / rape too. They are determined to water down the definition in order to make every single man a rapist event…
/r/MensRights08/03/24 02:43 PM
16

Feminism may not = left wing, but they hang out in LOTS of the same places, and they have LOTS of the same friends. There is significant overlap between their agendas
/r/MensRights08/03/24 02:35 PM
8

It’s like a bingo card of woke shit.
/r/MensRights04/03/24 04:38 PM
16

Also, that video likely was VERY cherry picked. They probably interviewed hundreds of People and showed the 10 guys that didn’t remember their kids birthdays. Or maybe some of those guys were playing dumb to be funny. Anyone taking that video as proof that men don’t know their kids birthdays is stupid.
/r/MensRights04/03/24 04:37 PM
–

“Sector leading results” !! What the fuck is a nine-day Fortnite?
/r/MensRights04/03/24 04:26 PM
3

You won’t get banned here for expressing an opinion. It’s not at all like feminist subs.
/r/MensRights01/03/24 03:28 PM
1

Does she have an OF? Soliciting DMs is a tell tale sign
/r/MensRights01/03/24 03:25 PM
12

Interesting. The very first post I see when I go there says: Do men age out of their s*xual perversion? Why are men perverts and does it change. And I saw exactly no one call it out or disagree. Absolutely zero misandry over there. What a beacon of fair mindedness and objectivity.
/r/MensRights29/02/24 06:12 PM
10

Off topic … conscription age is 18 - 40? That seems like an enormous age range. I would assume it would be more like 18 - 25
/r/MensRights28/02/24 09:39 PM
7

But they aren’t. People are free to choose their own career paths, men and women alike. No one is assigned a career regardless of their sex.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 08:06 PM
8

So an all boys school is paying women triple what they pay men to teach? Yassss! Slay queen! Grrrrrrrrrrl power! Equality! Bullshit
/r/MensRights27/02/24 05:17 PM
3

There’s also an earnings gap between Taco Bell employees and brain surgeons, but you hardly ever hear about that, do you?
/r/MensRights27/02/24 05:05 PM
1

That’s a woman problem then. Her peers are the other women in the room. If they don’t respect each other, that’s their problem.
/r/MensRights26/02/24 11:24 PM
2

Sorry man, not trying to pile on. Maybe file a complaint with the bar association? Good luck
/r/MensRights23/02/24 11:21 PM
1

Do you have a lawyer? Because it doesn’t sound like you do. If you do, then they aren’t a very good one. Man it’s been 5 years! They are growing up and you are missing it. You need to take the offense to her. I’ve never been divorced and I am not a lawyer, so I am about as ignorant as you can get on the subject, but damn dude, it really sounds like you are being too passive here. You’ve got to start pushing HARD for visitation. Good luck man
/r/MensRights23/02/24 10:38 PM
2

Don’t get me wrong, there are some great aspects to the “trad” movement. But thinking men are smart enough to actually run a family is probably one of the dumbest things I’ve ever heard. Yeah, that video was just a joke. There’s no real misandry here. /s
/r/MensRights23/02/24 08:22 PM
5

“Maybe me a sandwich, honey. “ “Lighten up, it was a joke. “ I’m sure this would go over well
/r/MensRights23/02/24 08:21 PM
53

The lunatics on TikTok aren’t the real problem. The problem is the relatively “normal” women who have had the rot seep into their brain. They think they don’t hate men or carry biases, but they just accept the misandry as a normal part of life. They never get questioned or made to feel like their feelings are wrong so they assume they are right because they live in an echo chamber.
/r/MensRights23/02/24 08:12 PM
16

This is really the only way to fix the problem. Innocent until proven guilty has to actually mean something. Protecting the ID of the accuser while blasting the accused’s name and face everywhere should stop until an adjudication of guilt.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 12:31 PM
19

She’s a feminist first and a mother second. She’d rather teach her son ideology than how to be a man. I wonder where her loyalties lie.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 01:55 AM
21

If a woman accuses her son of raping her, I wonder who she’ll believe.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 12:58 AM
45

There’s very few sub Reddits where you can speak freely without getting banned for going against the hive mind.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 12:29 AM
1

You also have to account for the fact that Men and women are different. I’m sure boredom sets in but most women are naturally more domestic than most men are. Men are less content with living a life indoors than women are. That’s not a pro or con against either. I’m just recognizing that most women seem to adjust to home life taking care of kid’s and house better than most men do.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 05:58 PM
2

Congratulations. You have chosen happiness instead of misery. Feminazis have decided to be miserable and offended at every turn of life. They see men as the enemy which is such an awful way to go through life.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 10:26 PM
1

Maybe simp or white knight?
/r/MensRights20/02/24 10:24 PM
4

Or just respect. Or maybe we’d settle for not hate.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 10:22 PM
6

At the very minimum, I think you deserve to know if your girl has slept with any of your friends, relatives, acquaintances or coworkers. A man shouldn’t be put in a position of unknowingly being friendly with his Eskimo brother. It’s emasculating and humiliating for a woman to do that to a man. As for an overall number, I guess that’s up to the woman to reveal or not. But I firmly believe if she does decide to answer the question, it must be honest. The correct answers are 1) the truth or 2) I w…
/r/MensRights20/02/24 06:07 AM
2

Just world <> real world unfortunately. But of course, I agree with you in principle.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 12:44 AM
6

Oh FFS are you even serious right now? Is there ANY way in which women aren’t the absolute victim of everything?
/r/MensRights19/02/24 11:25 PM
4

Normally I’d agree. But if they don’t provide any men’s rooms then they get what they get. And besides, I shit at work about 2 times a year … maybe. So I pretty much always use the seat up position.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 11:20 PM
3

You aren’t living in reality. If you would truly behave the way you are suggesting, and aren’t just keyboard warrioring, then carry extra money for bail when you go to concerts. You aren’t going to win an argument with the shrews who would block you from entering the men’s room. They are imbued with entitlement and the police will back them up. I guarantee.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 11:18 PM
9

The problem I’ve seen is when women take over a bathroom, there’s usually some old harpies standing guard and not allowing men in. They literally steal the men’s room. If they coexisted I’d be ok but kicking me out of MY space is beyond the pale. You might ignore the Karen, but you very well might be going to jail for using a women’s room.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 10:31 PM
16

I would definitely be leaving those seats up.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 10:29 PM
-1

Men know what is expected of them. They know to get into the yoke. They know they need to be ambitious to attract women. They know they are beasts of burden. Women know they can choose what they love because they’ll be able to find a back stop to really pay for stuff.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 05:38 PM
8

Yes but. Yea but. Refusing to accept any thing anyone says, and instead telling them why they are all wrong is not good faith. Telling them that men are the root cause of whatever problem that they are complaining about is not good faith. They may have honest disagreement with a few details, but not acknowledging any of the issues as valid is not good faith.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 05:33 PM
17

So far, every response I’ve seen from you is argumentative. That’s not “in good faith”. You may not argree with everything people say here, but rebutting each and every response to your question is evidence you aren’t here to learn. You are just here to argue.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 05:00 PM
18

Let me rephrase your comment: Women hating men is all men’s fault.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 04:57 PM
18

If a woman doesn’t want a child, she can: not have sex use birth control have an abortion abandon the baby at a hospital, church or fire station put the baby up for adoption require the man to pay for it A man can: not have sex use birth control A woman has zero financial obligation to that child if she does any of those things. Even setting aside the question of abortion, why are women allowed to abandon or adopt their baby and have no financial obligation? Men can’t do that. A woman has infini…
/r/MensRights19/02/24 04:52 PM
1

Gas station lighting Oh wait, that would be very bad
/r/MensRights19/02/24 12:53 PM
8

Men of the past knew this because it was an acceptable topic of discussion. Female hysteria is a real thing. Feminists in the 1980s rebelled against the use of the term and made it go poof. This is the scary part. Not just about the term “hysteria” but so much language and concepts that get destroyed by the language police. Orwell was dead on. They work so hard to control the language because they know that is the key to power.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 07:21 AM
3

And do you go in those women’s sub’s and tell them they are full of shit too or just here?
/r/MensRights19/02/24 07:15 AM
14

Yes, men do deserve that. But the world isn’t fair. And men live in the real world.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 07:08 AM
7

I’ve always loved this quote from King Longshanks in Braveheart: “Not my gentle son. The mere sight of him would only encourage an enemy to take over the whole country. So whom do I send?”
/r/MensRights19/02/24 07:05 AM
5

I am not saying this happened to me nor didn’t. Wait, so she doesn’t do this? This makes no sense. It’s like in Stripes when the guy says he enlisted in the army in case he got drafted. The sergeant says, “son there ain’t but draft no more” and the private says “there was one?”
/r/MensRights19/02/24 06:44 AM
8

How do people get to be such pieces of shit? I mean, was she like this as a child? What happened to make her become this deranged? On another note, I hate it when people (98% of the time women) are talking and trying to maintain their crying through effort. Near the end, just before they arrest her, she is trying so hard to create tear’s and cry while talking to the cop to elicit sympathy.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/02/24 01:46 AM
9

And it’s the only thing he should do with her.
/r/MensRights17/02/24 01:31 AM
6

Women treat feminism like a cafeteria plan. Take what they want. Leave the rest. Maybe change their minds tomorrow.
/r/MensRights14/02/24 09:02 PM
15

“Real feminists” have fought tooth and nail against equal child custody for fathers. “Real feminists” have fought tooth and nail against reforming alimony laws to make them not permanent. “Real feminists” don’t give a shit about men’s issues. They are not fighting for equality. They pay it lip service only.
/r/MensRights14/02/24 09:01 PM
6

Do you have an expectation not to have your image posted with creepy sexual innuendo?
/r/MensRights13/02/24 08:24 PM
11

That doesn’t change the fact that a man photographing a woman in public and posting it with virtual drool running off would be considered stalking. But this is fine
/r/MensRights13/02/24 08:23 PM
3

Priceless
/r/MensRights13/02/24 06:05 PM
2

I think this is spot on. Misandry is definitely rampant on Reddit, as is radical liberalism that despises and censors any conservative speech at all. However, just keeping it real, there’s a fair amount of misogyny too. And You are right, men keep each other more grounded when they are being unreasonable. Women have no such Governor on their thoughts and speech. Men (most men) can look at the World and realize it’s fucking fantastic to be a man most of the time. However it’s not all rainbows and…
/r/MensRights13/02/24 06:04 PM
1

Temptations can be avoided. Some people will cheat, no matter what obstacles are in their path. Some people will never cheat. Ever. Some people — probably a plurality — will cheat if the opportunity presents itself in too enticing, and risk-free a package.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 11:05 PM
9

You are tragically naïve. Cheating is rampant by both sexes. Going out and getting drunk without your spouse and dancing in a club with the opposite sex is a nearly guaranteed recipe for disaster. How many stories have you read about people cheating with their “platonic” opposite sex friends? It’s one thing to trust. It’s another to invite trouble by an overly permissive nature.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 12:39 PM
10

But what was the source of her mental illness? What did a man do to cause it? Or was it a hormonal issue over which she had no control whatsoever and was the true victim here? She probably was being manipulated by a man into doing it. It’s sad how this poor woman was mistreated. Who can really blame her for her actions?
/r/MensRights12/02/24 12:29 PM
1

Trans is a real tough one for feminists. They want SO hard to be liberal but advocating for trans rights means less protections for real women. It means real women will never win a sporting event again ever. It means real women will never have their own locker rooms free from men. It means men will be crowned “woman of the year” at least half the time which basically means men are better at everything, even better at being women. They are in a pickle.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 09:19 PM
4

Not once has a mens rights group tried to take away from women's rights. You aren’t thinking like they do. To them it’s a zero sum game. If men get problems solved for them, it is always at the expense of women. Men want equal child custody decisions — that subtracts from women’s child custody Men want equal funding for men’s shelters — that takes away from money for women’s shelters. Etc. It doesn’t matter that there are many many examples of women’s issues hogging all the resources from men, s…
/r/MensRights11/02/24 09:15 PM
2

It’s obvious when you look at a skeleton whether it was a man or woman. But modern scientists are playing along with this make believe that it’s phobic to recognize this. They pretend that men who think they are women can get periods and need Pap smears. They pretend that men can get pregnant. It’s insane and not based on science at all. It’s 100% ideology.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 09:23 PM
6

Science has succumbed to an agenda. Science is perfectly objective. Scientists are not. Today scientists suppress facts that contradict their world view. Test results that confirm they are wrong are silenced. No one has a problem with science, it’s the distortions and lies that people object to.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 08:47 PM
6

Easy. You are in r/MensRights. If you can define “man” without using the word “man” in the definition or referring to anything other than a persons sex, you might be on the right.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 03:10 PM
50

Exactly. Republicans / conservatives are pretty much exactly where they have always been. It’s democrats moving waaaayy left that just creates the illusion that republicans are moving right.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 03:26 AM
179

Women are becoming more liberal because they live and die based on social media.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 02:56 AM
1

They don’t just “forget” to take their pill. Anyone saying otherwise is gaslighting.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 08:05 PM
6

Margot Robbie is objectively hot. But … there are many many women I would take over her who are not as glamorous and objectively gorgeous as her. She just isn’t “cute”. I mean there are some women who may not even qualify as beautiful but there’s just something about their face, personality, mannerisms that make it so I can’t take my eyes off them. I’m drawn to them because they are cute. Margot doesn’t activate that for me. The fact that these women were so incensed about men’s opinions is craz…
/r/MensRights09/02/24 02:25 PM
6

It’s a very poorly kept secret that women sometimes use pregnancy to manipulate men. When the idea of someone “forgetting” to take their BC pill comes up on Reddit, the ladies all clutch their pearls and say they would never do such a thing, but they nudge nudge wink wink at each other when a friend suggests they did it / are thinking about doing it. “Men are never ready” they tell each other. “He’ll love the baby when it gets here”
/r/MensRights08/02/24 03:55 PM
1

I guess it was the “… not the man’s fault” that made me think you were forgiving him. It seemed pretty clear to me that you were excusing his behavior. In what context would it not be his fault?
/r/MensRights08/02/24 03:05 PM
10

if you have then it's a medicial failure and not the man's fault. Setting aside the question of whether this was a false accusation because he did or didn’t have it, it sounds like you are saying that having unprotected sex without disclosing a positive HIV status is ok? If I misinterpret, I apologize. But I don’t give a damn how good any medicine is, it’s not fool proof. If you have an STD then you have an obligation to disclose before unprotected sex (edit: frankly the duty to disclose exists …
/r/MensRights08/02/24 12:34 PM
1

Where did I say or insinuate that he thought he was? I’m just making the comment that his behavior is not acceptable. And from his response, he agrees.
/r/MensRights08/02/24 12:41 AM
-4

That doesn’t make you a hero or a saint. Quite the opposite
/r/MensRights07/02/24 05:55 PM
3

The critical part of CRT as I have ever heard it explained is that color blindness (or sex blindness, as is the case here) is no longer acceptable. It’s not enough to be fair to everyone equally today. You have to put your thumb on the scales in the opposite direction because people were treated bad a long time ago. It’s contrary to every belief in fairness I’ve ever heard. So for this post, treating women fairly is simply not enough. We have to grovel at their very (literally it seems) to atone…
/r/MensRights07/02/24 05:54 PM
6

How it started is irrelevant. How it currently is is all that matters.
/r/MensRights07/02/24 05:50 PM
-5

How? 🍿
/r/MensRights07/02/24 04:21 PM
28

This is 100% the entire basis of CRT. Bad things happened to my great great grandfather, therefore I deserve special privileges.
/r/MensRights07/02/24 04:19 PM
10

Common sense needs a comeback. Sanity needs a comeback
/r/MensRights07/02/24 04:18 PM
42

Women see this and think it is their birth right to have men grovel at their feet. They carry this “divine feminine” attitude throughout their every day life and we have to deal with it. This guy is a fucking piece of shit.
/r/MensRights07/02/24 04:14 PM
6

Another year. thanks
/r/MensRights06/02/24 08:09 PM
1

I feel like there’s a comment buried in there that is very confusing.
/r/MensRights06/02/24 03:39 PM
16

It stops when they say it stops. And every time a man asks the question, the finish line gets moved back 1 year.
/r/MensRights06/02/24 03:36 PM
16

Misandry directly leads to mental health issues in men, who are very over represented in suicide statistics. I think misandry is a huge fucking problem.
/r/MensRights06/02/24 03:34 PM
12

I agree. It wasn’t meant to be a serious discussion of manspreading, just an example of how biology is never an acceptable excuse for men.
/r/MensRights06/02/24 12:48 PM
1

You do you
/r/MensRights06/02/24 12:46 PM
79

Women use biology to try to justify their egregious behavior all the time - PMS, postpartum depression, baby fever, menopause, you name it. There’s always a reason their bad behavior isn’t their fault. But if men try to say the size and shape of their external genitals cause them to have to sit differently on a subway, it’s obviously sexism and male entitlement. If men get super horny as teens and make a dating mistake, tough titty. There’s never a reason biology can be used as an excuse for men…
/r/MensRights06/02/24 05:53 AM
16

I think Trump mostly stands by what he says, policy-wise. He’s not a good human being but he may be the only one willing to stand his ground and not be bullied into backing down. They call him names, insult him, indict him, sue him, impeach him … he doesn’t give a fuck. He’s like the honey badger. I think if anyone is likely to stand up for men’s rights it is definitely him. He doesn’t allow the left to use their word soup against him. He ignores their perversion of the English language to suit …
/r/MensRights06/02/24 05:49 AM
23

Trump gave us DeVoss, who canceled the “Dear colleague” letter. There are much worse things for men to do than to vote in the best interests.
/r/MensRights06/02/24 05:19 AM
2

I’m sorry. What about your surprise was “pleasant”? This looks about 90% same old shit, except for the men’s mental health question
/r/MensRights05/02/24 06:58 AM
50

Don’t defend yourself because if you do you are victim blaming…..speechless This is what defies belief. Brand is being muzzled against defending himself in the court of public opinion, meanwhile “Jane Doe” enjoys her anonymity and has no need to speak publicly about it. The burden of proof is (or should be) on the one who levels the accusations. It’s time to reconsider this anonymity thing. Either they are both made public or neither are.
/r/MensRights04/02/24 03:24 PM
-4

I don’t see how that’s a guarantee at all. You think she’s going to admit that the sex was paid for?
/r/MensRights04/02/24 02:50 PM
1

What does your username mean?
/r/MensRights04/02/24 02:07 PM
27

I thought in England there was a law that friendly text messages — even sent after the fact — couldn’t be used to demonstrate consent. It’s all fucked up.
/r/MensRights04/02/24 02:00 PM
–

She somehow has to prove that any contact was non-consensual, In a just world, yes. In this world …
/r/MensRights04/02/24 01:59 PM
-11

And where’s the guarantee they won’t do the same thing?
/r/MensRights04/02/24 01:57 PM
5

I think misandry is caused by misogyny Yeh, I guess men had it coming to them. Do you realize how long of a leash you are being given here to blame men for the ills of the world? A man would have been banned after the first post if they said a similar thing in a feminist group. Likely an overall Reddit ban. I’m done with you. You pretend to be open minded and fair then push the knife in men’s backs. No thanks.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 01:48 AM
6

Exactly. This fiction that black men get shot on sight is insidious. There are literally thousands of interactions with police every day that go peacefully, or are dealt with professionally. Probably tens of thousands. The very very very few that tragically involve a shooting are big news when they happen. They are provoked / justified shootings 99% of the time based on the actions of the person. And the coverage is magnified a whole lot more if the person is black which makes it appear pervasiv…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/24 02:55 PM
1

It’s funny that everyone knows what “Baker Acting” someone means though, LOL. Good old Florida sunshine laws This woman is clearly unstable
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/24 02:49 PM
5

Not all heroes wear capes, but if you do, I won’t judge. Thanks
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/24 02:10 PM
22

Stop. A MAN would’ve been on the ground
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/24 01:51 PM
16

After watching her other video, please tell me she has released some new material. Please tell me she has a greatest hits compilation that we could watch. When is a new video dropping?
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/24 01:49 PM
54

Is Baker Act just a Florida thing or is it national? This woman needs to be Baker Acted because she’s clearly mentally incompetent.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/24 01:04 PM
2

The ass kickings don’t always just fall from out of the sky
/r/MensRights02/02/24 12:51 PM
10

The problem is, you say you aren’t blaming men, then go on a tirade about how every woman you know has been assaulted or harassed by men. You can’t just say you don’t blame men then shit all over them by lumping them all together. Participate in the victim Olympics somewhere else. You sound like a typical misandrist.
/r/MensRights02/02/24 03:34 AM
7

I’m sure r/fourthwavewomen would applaud you for this point of view. You should go share it with them. Blaming men isn’t appreciated here.
/r/MensRights02/02/24 03:15 AM
18

I think misandry is caused by misogyny, mentally ill women with a past of abuse and bad experiences with men usually end up hateful and bitter towards men This is just blaming men. Again. You think men haven’t had bad experiences with women in their past that affects their perception of women? Or is it only women who are allowed to hate all men because a few screwed them over?
/r/MensRights01/02/24 09:55 PM
11

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/iRznrbCiou
/r/MensRights01/02/24 09:53 PM
1

Can someone explain why people call it “grape” instead of rape? Or “seggs” instead of sex? Or any of the other ridiculous euphemisms. What’s with that nonsense?
/r/MensRights01/02/24 02:26 AM
2

Ugh! Wear a fucking condom, you nimrods!
/r/MensRights31/01/24 03:09 PM
9

It’s definitely a controlling mechanism. They use it to put men on the defensive and guilt them into “behaving”. They also get pity when they are <sCaREd>.
/r/MensRights31/01/24 02:45 PM
1

I agree the testing should be mandatory. I agree the number is probably MUCH MUCH higher than anyone ever lets on. I do NOT agree with 70%. That's absurd. If that were true and the truth ever came out, there would be blood in the streets. Guys would be killing each other and their wives. It would be like The Purge out there.
/r/MensRights30/01/24 08:20 PM
–

FFS
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 08:02 PM
143

A man raising his voice by two decibels is sO sCAry!!
/r/MensRights30/01/24 06:43 PM
0

If women are loved unconditionally, from whom do we need protecting? No one ever said all women are loved unconditionally by all men. If women were loved unconditionally and all we have to do is love you back, why do so many men insist on asking women what they bring to the table? Because feminists are killing the golden goose. By treating men so badly for decades, men have begun to fight back by demanding some of the same things women demand.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 05:28 PM
-2

All they have to do is love me back. Men have to provide and protect and prove their value as a man, in addition to loving back.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 03:53 PM
-1

Sex? Oh no. What a terrible thing for a wife to be expected to provide her husband.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 03:45 PM
0

Yes, expected. No one said it was expected on demand. But without sex, you are just roommates.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 03:25 PM
-2

Sex? Oh no. What a terrible thing for a wife to be expected to provide her husband.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 03:16 PM
-2

The quote doesn’t mean every single woman, pet and child is loved unconditionally. It means none of them have to earn their love, it’s just given. Men have to earn their love to be valued.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 03:14 PM
2

It’s a Chris Rock quote
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 03:11 PM
-1

A woman who lives with her parents still and has no job or prospects of finding one will still find a man to love her, no problem. A woman who can’t have kids will still have no problem finding a man to love her. A man with these qualities will be very very lucky if he finds a woman to express any interest in him. Women don’t have to bring anything except themselves. Men have to earn love. That’s what the quote means
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 03:11 PM
13

Oh come on now. Women consistently low ball the number and like to say it’s only 1% of kids or something, but 70% is kooky. It’s not 70% or anywhere close to that. Let’s be realistic here. The actual number is probably more like 15 - 25% — and that’s appalling enough without having to wildly exaggerate the number like 70%.
/r/MensRights30/01/24 01:09 PM
45

In a logical world you are absolutely correct. But feminism has destroyed Logic and common sense. In this world, in a post generalizing negatively about men if you say “not all men” you get told to STFU because that means you are part of the problem. But generalizing negatively about women is blatant misogyny. Sometimes the only way to beat fire is with fire.
/r/MensRights30/01/24 12:54 PM
39

Yep. This one’s for recreation, not procreation
/r/MensRights28/01/24 05:16 PM
10

Exactly. OP got this ass backwards. A lonely woman requires a meeting of the minds to figure out how we can fix the tragedy and an outpouring of sympathy. A lonely man is a loser incel. He needs to fix his shit if he wants a woman. He owns this problem.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 05:13 PM
1

There’s more than one definition of whore.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 06:45 AM
23

Boy this thread really drew out the lurking women, didn’t it? Seems to have touched a nerve
/r/MensRights28/01/24 06:43 AM
9

Rock on, King
/r/MensRights28/01/24 06:42 AM
14

…women are happiest when they are single and childless and many older women are choosing to stay single. Ok so this thread doesn’t apply to you so just move along? If you are happy being alone and childless then just be happy and go away. Why are you butting in?
/r/MensRights28/01/24 06:33 AM
76

Right? They turn their noses up at you then expect you to be there waiting for them after they’ve fucked their way through half the town.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 06:29 AM
3

What a dipshit. How are you gonna “create life” without a man?
/r/MensRights28/01/24 06:01 AM
1

Show me where the hell I excused the whore’s behavior? But her being a whore doesn’t make your behavior any more acceptable.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 06:00 AM
9

Your definition of “toxic” masculinity is governed by where you are in your cycle. When you are horny, there’s almost nothing an attractive man can do that would turn you off.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 04:03 PM
5

Not at all a fan of guys who knowingly fuck another man’s woman.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 03:59 PM
9

Ain’t that the truth. And if you refuse to help, you’re an asshole.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 03:57 PM
6

They are trying to bring men’s masculinity down to their level so they can compete
/r/MensRights27/01/24 03:56 PM
16

Oh boy, Kelly Carlson’s fans were hopped up about that. Can you imagine if Taylor Swift is ever required to pay alimony? They’ll riot in the streets
/r/MensRights26/01/24 12:01 PM
3

A feminist icon!
/r/MensRights25/01/24 09:43 PM
6

Outrage for the murderer Bryn Spejcher?
/r/MensRights25/01/24 09:42 PM
2

Fucking patriarchy always screwing things up for women.
/r/MensRights25/01/24 09:39 PM
4

You are absolutely right about two things: mothers are horrified to learn how the system is stacked against their sons, and the situation is getting worse every year women are the best chance to fight back. Anything men say is ignored or mocked and the complainer is just called an incel. But I still say you are very much the exception to the rule. Most women are believing the social media nonsense that they are fed nonstop about how evil men are. They truly believe they alone are victims. Even t…
/r/MensRights24/01/24 09:16 PM
6

The fact that you haven’t been banned yet is a testament to this sub. There’s no chance in hell a similarly stupid hateful comment about women wouldn’t result in a ban on twox.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 09:03 PM
8

Poor girl. She was minding her own Business and this guy forced her to take a bong hit. Then she was so overcome with guilt at the accidental stabbing that she tried to take her own life, poor dear. It’s obvious the patriarchy caused this to happen. Too bad that misogynist judge gave her community service.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 09:01 PM
4

Is this article about the murderer Bryn Spejcher?
/r/MensRights24/01/24 08:58 PM
6

You are wildly optimistic. Women have no reason to want to help the men’s rights movement. Acknowledging that men get the short end of the stick in anything implies that women are privileged in some areas. Of course, we know this is very true, but feminists can’t allow this to happen. Women are the victim’s and always will be. Men can see the logical arguments made by women that they were oppressed in the past and Men helped to get rid of those factors. Women do not acknowledge any of the men’s …
/r/MensRights24/01/24 04:38 PM
2

So that’s the way it is now. Give us Oscars or else we will call you misogynistic.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 02:51 PM
1

Seriously. 10, maybe 15 years ago, the idea that sleep touching your long term sexual partner was wrong would have been heartily laughed at. This is what feminism has done.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 02:14 AM
–

The idea that people in a long term relationship, who have sex consistently, can think they were assaulted because their partner touched them in their sleep is just silly. I don’t even know what to say about that. Something that you would very willingly do awake isn’t wrong. This is just part of the amazing, ever-expanding definition of rape that wants every man to feel like a rapist, even if they aren’t ever charged. So to answer your question, yes, you were “raped” based on the new and improve…
/r/MensRights20/01/24 01:51 AM
4

Exactly. She became accustomed to a certain lifestyle? Well I became accustomed to the sex. Why am I required to use my body to earn her money but she’s not required to use her body to relieve my blue balls?
/r/MensRights20/01/24 01:46 AM
6

What a King Kemehameha beeotch
/r/MensRights19/01/24 08:44 PM
14

Then it’s a rigor pay gap, not a gender pay gap. No one forces women to take the easier jobs. That’s like saying there is an experience pay gap. Well no shit. People with more experience in the same job earn more. There’s an age pay gap. Well no shit. People who are older have more experience, more seniority, are better at their jobs and occupy higher level positions after promotions. There’s a hours-worked pay gap. No shit. You work more hours, you get bigger pay. There’s a credentialed pay gap…
/r/MensRights19/01/24 04:10 PM
26

It’s an interesting dichotomy. In today’s society, they are clearly dominating every aspect of life in a modern world, but still tenaciously cling to the idea that they are eternal victims. So much so that men who dare to point out their obvious dominance are mocked and scorned. Women have all the power but believe, to their core, that they have zero power. Are they pretending not to see it or are they truly blind?
/r/MensRights19/01/24 06:49 AM
6

I feel like this cop was not entirely right here. He should be required to identify the reason he pulled her over. And requiring her to get out of the vehicle seemed unreasonable. I mean, she wasn’t cussing at him like I see so many others do. And all she was doing was using her brights — which is very very annoying — but his actions seem excessive to me. I’m usually pro cop in the majority of cases but I’m not here
/r/PussyPassDenied18/01/24 10:01 PM
2

Too bad you're not Euripides … As immortalized in the classic joke “Euripides trousers, you menda deez trousers“
/r/MensRights16/01/24 08:51 PM
2

Older males (45+) I feel attacked! LOL
/r/MensRights16/01/24 08:49 PM
1

Thank you!
/r/MensRights16/01/24 08:37 PM
1

And I feel like you didn’t even read the article that I’m referring to.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 08:32 PM
11

I am not condoning it at all, but I don’t think it deserves jail time and sexual assault conviction unless it’s a recurring thing.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 04:55 PM
9

Comment
/r/MensRights16/01/24 04:46 PM
2

Who most embraces social Marxism? Liberals
/r/MensRights16/01/24 04:46 PM
9

Grabbing a butt is clearly wrong. There’s no valid way to argue that it’s ok. I totally get it. However, is it a crime worthy of a life altering / destroying sentence? I mean, come on. It’s a fleeting physical contact that deserves a slap on the Face and harsh words. Why does someone deserve to have their life destroyed for it? It doesn’t really seem like the punishment fits the crime.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 04:44 PM
1

Think of it in liberal terms. He was “protesting” the systemic misandry and if you aren’t upsetting people then it’s not a proper “protest”. He was mostly peaceful.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 04:26 PM
11

Baby daddy is a IV drug abuser who has vegetation on his heart valve. I’m sorry, but WTF?!
/r/MensRights16/01/24 04:21 PM
-1

Liberalism is a literal religion at this point. If you violate any of their constantly evolving tenets, you are an evil doer and anything they do to you is justified.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 04:13 PM
2

Yet another in the amazing, expanding definition of rape. They won’t be happy until they can call every man a rapist for one reason or another. If you are having sex with a man only because he’s rich, then you are a whore. Your motivation is his money. If you are having sex with a man because he’s a doctor, it’s because you think he’s rich and you are a whore.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 03:58 PM
-1

Mental illness is widespread and growing. Of course you should be respectful to other people. If Steve wants me to call him Rebecca, I will. If Rebecca says she’s getting married to Sheila / Simon, I’ll congratulate him / her. I’m a nice, polite person. I want everyone to be happy and lead the life they want to lead. But they can never make me actually believe a man changed into a woman because he wanted to. Or even because he got an operation and cut off his wang. He’s a man. He was born a man.…
/r/MensRights16/01/24 03:53 PM
2

I mean if you have sex with the express purpose of getting pregnant and a man lies about being snipped I can see it. But just being in a relationship with a guy without being told he was snipped is no problem.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 03:46 PM
6

This is cancel culture. You violated the groupthink and therefore you are an un person to them. It wouldn’t matter if you cured cancer tomorrow, you are unworthy of recognition. The idea that people can have and express different ideas and hold unpopular opinions and still be accepted as a human being is a dead concept. Liberals have instigated this behavior in the last 15 - 20 years. They want to destroy families so they tell their adherents that if your parents are conservative they have to be…
/r/MensRights16/01/24 12:40 PM
3

Ever heard of Country Club Threads?
/r/MensRights14/01/24 03:28 PM
-9

Her face, yes. But that body is righteous
/r/PussyPassDenied13/01/24 12:25 AM
1

Slammin body
/r/PussyPassDenied13/01/24 12:24 AM
3

I can hear the response already: “Men worry we’ll take their stuff. Women worry that men will take their lives”
/r/MensRights11/01/24 08:03 PM
4

Spoiler: she’s not afraid of men. She just gets a high from the street cred being an abused woman gets her.
/r/MensRights11/01/24 08:00 PM
2

A man raising his voice two decibels will cause some women to turn on the waterworks on cue. It’s so fucking manipulative.
/r/MensRights11/01/24 07:56 PM
3

I think that’s exactly what men are doing. Trying to help their partner by delaying their own gratification.
/r/MensRights10/01/24 05:28 PM
1

Of course, you aren’t wrong, but your concerns would be laughed off in any other forum. Very insulting
/r/MensRights10/01/24 02:55 PM
10

Sex problems are always blamed on the man. Too fast? PE. Too slow? Porn addiction. Too small? His fault. Too big? His fault. She doesn’t come? He’s a bad lover. She’s not wet enough? He didn’t do enough foreplay. She’s not in the mood? He doesn’t do enough chores around the house. There’s literally no sex problem that is ever blamed on the woman. Ever.
/r/MensRights10/01/24 01:19 PM
38

So the ONSs get the freaky deaky stuff and the husband / LT BF gets the starfish. Nice
/r/MensRights10/01/24 01:15 PM
42

We are told that men come too quickly for women, therefore men are actively trying to find ways not to come. Tell me again which ones are the selfish ones in bed? Why don’t we ever discuss why it’s taking women so long? There’s two people, why is the assumption always that the man is the problem with sex? Always
/r/MensRights10/01/24 01:10 PM
5

Just to clarify, I am not, in any way, denigrating the ability of women to have participated in the project, nor their contributions supporting their husbands who did work on it. I’m just saying that I doubt this idea that they actually were integral to the project and have somehow been whitewashed in the movie. That implies that sexism is worse today than it was then! No way!
/r/MensRights09/01/24 04:31 PM
218

I think it’s much more likely that Oppenheimer is historically accurate. There’s a make believe in her article that women worked alongside men, side by side on this project and their contributions have been whitewashed away. I don’t believe that. Not that some women couldn’t have worked on the team, but I really don’t think they were allowed to. Sexism at the time would have prevented it (which was very wrong, of course). It’s wishful revisionist history to add women to the process in any sort o…
/r/MensRights09/01/24 07:19 AM
1

Our national legislature is "more diverse than ever" and it's still 75% white. You dumbass. According to the last census, the US was 75.5% white. If Congress is 75% white then white people are underrepresented. I’m done talking to you.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/01/24 09:48 PM
1

Why is it such a tragedy if lawmakers make space for elected white people to meet with one another? See how that sounds?
/r/PussyPassDenied08/01/24 09:33 PM
1

You are talking nonsense. White people were neither invited nor allowed at this party. That is blatant racism. Whether black people decide to come to Republican events is entirely up to them. They are more than welcome to come and join the Party and the festivities. You are being willfully obtuse.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/01/24 05:31 PM
1

Your juvenile attempt at humor is unfunny. Any one and everyone is welcome to join the Republican Party. Literally everyone is invited.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/01/24 04:12 PM
1

Please explain which part
/r/MensRights08/01/24 04:09 PM
11

Then what is it?
/r/MensRights08/01/24 12:25 PM
1

So then a whites only party would also be ok?
/r/PussyPassDenied08/01/24 06:25 AM
2

About the same time they decided being “color blind” was insufficient and negative discrimination was necessary to right the wrongs of the past. This has become an integral part of CRT.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/01/24 06:23 AM
2

“It is my intention to foster a city that truly lives its values and provides space for all communities to come together …" … except for the whites
/r/PussyPassDenied08/01/24 06:20 AM
1

So Pee Wee Herman would have been happy to know about this.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/01/24 06:08 AM
1

But normally in those movies there are lots of men fighting and losing to the bad guy first, so they must soften him up for the heroine to come in and kick ass.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/01/24 05:52 AM
1

I’m all for making them have consequences to let them understand the pain. The thing is, someone squeezing my butt doesn’t traumatize me. It’s not something I’m going to need therapy for. It’s a big old nothing burger. Truth be told, it affects women the same way. They just have convinced us all that it affects them horribly. I AM NOT advocating for doing this. It’s very obviously wrong and horribly uncouth behavior. But the idea that a person becomes a registered sex offender for something as m…
/r/MensRights08/01/24 02:38 AM
8

For some reason, sex is the one and only thing that doesn’t apply to.
/r/MensRights08/01/24 02:34 AM
147

Yeah that’s pretty standard these days. The witches on The View can laugh when a man’s penis is cut off without fear of repercussions, then cancel any man who makes a joke about domestic violence against women. They literally believe they are superior and more deserving of life and rights than men are.
/r/MensRights07/01/24 07:36 AM
2

It’s cool. Sarcasm is hard to convey in writing but I thought I had slathered it on thick enough to shine through. I love Canada but the US bashing gets to me sometimes.
/r/MensRights06/01/24 09:32 PM
1

Dude. If you can’t read the sarcasm dripping off every word of my post I don’t know what to say.
/r/MensRights06/01/24 09:18 PM
2

I know this is a lie. First of all, Canada is not the US, therefore it is pure and perfect and a simply wonderful place to live all the time without exception. Second, you have universal healthcare which everyone knows is infallible and the only true indicator of being a civilized, first world country. So nice try, bucko, but I know you are all living in luxury and splendor in the great white north.
/r/MensRights06/01/24 09:14 PM
2

Several years ago I was at a fireworks display in my town waiting in line at the port-o-lets to urinate. I overheard a woman behind me talking to her friend say that “men shouldn’t even be allowed to use these bathrooms when women are waiting in line”. The audacity of that bitch! I was younger and didn’t say anything but this was when I learned that women really think of us as subhumans. In hindsight, i probably should have asked her where the hell she expects us to urinate.
/r/MensRights06/01/24 09:11 PM
5

This is one of the reasons I’m not an organ donor. I know the chance is probably minuscule, but I’m not taking it on faith that they will try everything in their power to save me if they think a woman would be a better use for my liver.
/r/MensRights06/01/24 09:07 PM
16

A functioning penis is FAR more important to a man’s health than a breast is to a woman.
/r/MensRights06/01/24 09:05 PM
1

Uh YEAH she is
/r/MensRights06/01/24 12:24 AM
5

Really surprising the numbers aren’t even more skewed
/r/MensRights05/01/24 09:41 PM
61

Men who don’t want to shave are an “ick” to women. Men who want their women to shave are an “ick” to women. I can’t see any double standard here.
/r/MensRights05/01/24 05:01 PM
4

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/acid-attacks-rise-katie-piper-b2431988.html “It also found the number of female victims exceeds male victims for the first time in a “worrying trend” of increased acid attacks on women.” For the first time, in 2022, female victims eclipsed male victims and they are flipping their shit about it. Nobody cares when it was mostly men but now that women are affected, we can’t have that!
/r/MensRights05/01/24 12:52 PM
8

I don’t understand how the Star Wars story is misleading. She said those things so she is an obvious misandrist. She hasn’t taken them back so she still believes them. She is the director of the next Star Wars movie. Therefore the strong likelihood is that it will be filled with feminist drivel and will suck.
/r/MensRights05/01/24 04:32 AM
6

And women are most often the aggressors in acid attacks.
/r/MensRights05/01/24 04:24 AM
2

Irrelevant. Has she said she no longer holds those views?
/r/MensRights05/01/24 04:23 AM
3

Right? Who gives a shit if she’s a woman? It’s the intentional disrespect to men that’s the problem. It’s the planned obsolescence of men that is the problem. It’s the double standard of being able to get away with saying this while a man would be cancelled that’s the problem.
/r/MensRights05/01/24 04:23 AM
1

What difference does it make when she said it? She hasn’t disavowed the sentiment since then.
/r/MensRights05/01/24 04:20 AM
2

Damn that hits hard
/r/MensRights04/01/24 04:55 PM
5

I feel like women have been absolutely dominating pop music for years (even decades).
/r/MensRights04/01/24 04:22 PM
28

https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/bihar-woman-throws-acid-on-man-for-refusing-to-marry-her-arrested-101702407960299-amp.html https://www.ekathimerini.com/news/1196311/woman-attacks-ex-husband-with-acid/ And this one is the best: Alarm as acid attacks soar by 69% with more women than men affected for first time “It also found the number of female victims exceeds male victims for the first time in a “worrying trend” of increased acid attacks on women.” Why is it a “worrying trend” that wom…
/r/MensRights04/01/24 12:46 PM
20

What movie are they discussing?
/r/MensRights04/01/24 12:39 PM
1

Again, I don’t know how you can quantify such a thing but based on how many times I’ve seen women say they aren’t sure they’ve ever even had an orgasm — these are women in their 20’s even — I’d say it must be much harder.
/r/MensRights31/12/23 07:03 PM
1

I don’t know how to quantify how hard it is for a person to orgasm but yes, I think on average it’s much harder for women.
/r/MensRights31/12/23 01:05 PM
12

Why is this men’s problem at all? It’s much harder for women to orgasm, so is it really surprising they don’t orgasm as much? Isn’t this an expected result?
/r/MensRights30/12/23 10:22 PM
1

If you believe sex is important and matters, then a woman (or man for that matter) who casually gives it away to anyone and everyone for multiple one night stands is not behaving in a manner that values sex
/r/MensRights30/12/23 09:54 PM
7

Sex matters but body count doesn’t matter? That makes no sense whatsoever. I’ll not try to attempt to enumerate all the ways things are defined as rape nowadays. Whatever list you can make will be outdated by lunch. The list has expanded exponentially in the last 50 years.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 02:57 PM
14

would you want to watch a movie with someone you didnt invite that broke into your home, hold you down on the couch hurting you and threatening to kill you if you fight against them? This is the classic definition. “Legitimate” rape, as it were. No one anywhere on the planet disagrees that this is a horrific crime because it involves force and violence and bodily harm. Modern definitions are much much more liberal. I’m very much on the bandwagon that it is a horrible crime, but then again I thin…
/r/MensRights30/12/23 02:24 PM
16

Here’s what I don’t understand Over the last 50 years we have been told increasingly that sex is meaningless. A high body count is trivial. To women, sex has no more significance than sitting next to a person on a bus. It’s ridiculous for men to even care how many men a woman has slept with. Over those same 50 years, the definition of rape and sexual assault has expanded exponentially. So much so that most men could be labeled rapists in some shape or form if you allow feminists to control the d…
/r/MensRights30/12/23 01:29 PM
4

Because standard response: it’s different
/r/MensRights23/12/23 03:23 PM
2

What were they thinking when they created the patriarchy? Geez, what a boneheaded move /s
/r/MensRights21/12/23 04:41 PM
16

Do all women cheat on their husbands? No but enough do that it’s better to assume they all will / do. Better to be safe than sorry
/r/MensRights20/12/23 07:52 PM
1

... Women dont see the men not on top as having value.
/r/MensRights20/12/23 07:49 PM
4

Exactly right. Men are born. Feminists choose to be feminists. Not everyone is born the same, but if you decide to adhere to a school of thought, it’s likely that you share their core beliefs. Generalizing a sex is extremely different from generalizing an ideology.
/r/MensRights20/12/23 07:47 PM
3

Because that’s what the article is about
/r/MensRights20/12/23 02:38 AM
6

Amazon and Google better fight this. If I was in Australia, they’d get thrown to the garbage if this passes and I damn sure would never buy one again.
/r/MensRights20/12/23 01:50 AM
5

If you constantly have to explain why a term doesn’t mean what it plainly sounds like it means, it’s a bad term. If the people you are ostensibly trying to help by using a term are offended by the term, it’s prima facie evidence that the term is bad. Men are the only ones who are told to suck it up and get over it if they don’t like the term, which, ironically, is about the most toxically masculine thing I’ve ever heard.
/r/MensRights19/12/23 05:28 PM
8

This is it exactly. If I “deadname” or “mispronoun” someone intentionally it’s proof I’m toxic. I’m supposed to be sensitive to names / labels that people feel are hurtful. However, telling someone the term “toxic masculinity” is hurtful is met with derision. If the real objective was sensitivity to how it makes me feel, they’d stop using the term.
/r/MensRights19/12/23 05:23 PM
2

It used to be that women would “forget” to take their pill when they decided they wanted to get pregnant. Now men will “forget” to tell their girlfriends / wives that they do take the pill until they decide they are ready to be fathers. It’s a beautiful world.
/r/MensRights19/12/23 04:31 PM
7

Who cares? Some bad men do bad things. Some bad women do bad things. The important thing is that the bad things are also happening to men. Don’t pretend women are the only victims.
/r/MensRights16/12/23 09:00 PM
2

Exactly. This isn’t a pro choice / pro life question. It’s basic math. 45% is definitely a “fairly large percentage” to agree with anything.
/r/MensRights16/12/23 03:11 PM
14

Find someone. I’ll wait
/r/MensRights15/12/23 02:57 AM
28

No. No one would agree with you. You are objectively wrong. There is no circumstance in which 45% is not a “fairly large percentage”. He didn’t say majority. Hell I’d even say it is a very large percentage.
/r/MensRights15/12/23 01:51 AM
13

For some reason, women believe men currently have the right to kill their babies and women do not. I guess? I mean, they keep saying men have a reproductive right that women don’t have so I think that must be what’s going on.
/r/MensRights15/12/23 01:34 AM
35

That’s just daft. In fact you are the only person who would not define 45% as a fairly large percentage.
/r/MensRights15/12/23 01:29 AM
6

I just don’t think your analogy works. A construction paper sign is nothing like the real thing. She was apparently using a real government issued ID of her sister, so presumably there’s a resemblance that made it look passable. He was legitimately tricked and that has to be balanced when determining guilt. However, it is a little hard to think of an 11 year old passing as 16 if you talk to her for more than a minute. 11 is pretty immature usually, unless she was extremely precocious.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 07:57 PM
33

Try r/fourthwavewomen or r/witchesvspatriarchy on for size
/r/MensRights13/12/23 07:37 PM
15

Women are taught from a young age that generalizing men is just fine but men doing it about women is all wrong and misogynist.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 07:35 PM
8

As far as I can tell, she divorced her husband because he was ok with brown sheets? Did I read that right? On another note, I really need to finally watch Mad Men.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 07:20 PM
8

If you’re speeding and your defense is “I didn’t know that was the speed limit” it does not invalidate the crime, But they don’t put up fake speed limit signs to trick you, do they? I agree it kind it defies belief that you wouldn’t realize it was an 11 year old. So in this case I think you may be right. But in other cases it may not be so obvious.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 06:53 PM
3

I agree. Thanks
/r/MensRights13/12/23 03:55 PM
6

What about good women?
/r/MensRights13/12/23 02:06 PM
1

Was this a relevant fact in the case?
/r/MensRights13/12/23 02:04 PM
18

Your construct is nonsensical. She can’t believe all those things and not be a misandrist. They are mutually exclusive.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 03:31 AM
28

If being sexually attracted to a nice set of hooters is wrong, I don’t want to be right.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 04:02 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter