TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ExtremeFirefighter59 Archive

View 1 post and 20 comments by ExtremeFirefighter59 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
212

False AccusationExtremeFirefighter59/r/MensRights13/02/25 06:49 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
13

Why isn’t this woman being charged with making false allegations of rape given the video clearly shows she gave consent? The man was punished correctly for making the video and showing it; now it should be the woman’s turn. There needs to be consequences for false allegations.
/r/MensRights05/06/26 09:50 PM
5

I’m struggling with how “beyond reasonable doubt” can be shown in this case.
/r/MensRights09/04/26 02:03 AM
17

Oh I know; was just highlighting how stupid the criteria are. Even a straight white male could identify as non-binary for the job.
/r/MensRights28/02/26 08:53 PM
22

But the white gay men can just identify as non-binary. That’s how this shit works.
/r/MensRights28/02/26 08:18 PM
12

The weird thing about rape cases that is different to other alleged crimes is that often the only evidence is the word of the alleged victim against the alleged perpetrator. So you have one person effectively saying “I am a victim of rape” and another saying “I am a victim of false accusations”. Yet the police will frequently prosecute alleged rapes on this basis but will never prosecute the false accusations without other substantive evidence. So a two tier justice system. The UK requires “beyo…
/r/MensRights05/02/26 08:55 PM
13

I doubt she will get much support from feminists because when cases like this are proven, it seriously challenges the narrative of “believe all women”. I agree with you that it was scary what might have been. Without the phone recording, he would have almost certainly been charged and gone to trial. It’s crazy that someone can be convicted on just the word of another person without a single piece of corroborating evidence. How can that possibly be “guilty beyond reasonable doubt?” The biggest na…
/r/MensRights18/01/26 09:20 PM
71

Plenty of evidence that they are not that rare. “We found that the recent consensus among sexual violence academics and women’s safety advocates that evidence shows that almost all sexual assault allegations are true, and that false allegations are extremely rare, is itself false. There is no robust way to determine the prevalence rate of false sexual assault allegations.” https://www.alrc.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/158.-J-Papadimitriou-and-T-Nankivell.pdf
/r/MensRights12/10/25 01:37 AM
11

The difficulty is determining the truth
/r/MensRights11/07/25 01:16 PM
2

Time to hit the gym and lift heavy.
/r/MensRights11/05/25 11:13 AM
3

The research tends to use only those cases where the police prosecute for false allegations which are obviously very hard to prove. Many people are found not guilty in court but the police do not prosecute their accusers as the system is biased. A recent sexual assault compensation scheme introduced in Australia had a majority of claimants were likely false accusations according to the police. https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/seven-arrested-over-1b-fake-sex-abuse-scam-in-sydney-20250213-p5lbr…
/r/MensRights10/05/25 09:05 AM
65

This is he said she said. If he now reports them to police for fake allegations, will they be prosecuted? Of course not even though the evidence is the same word vs word.
/r/MensRights08/05/25 10:31 PM
7

There is a high bar which is “beyond reasonable doubt.” The challenge, I believe, is that juries are too willing to believe the uncorroborated testimony of the alleged victim. I do not see how solely this evidence can be considered “beyond reasonable doubt”. Obviously, this makes rape cases hard to prosecute where the only issue is that of consent but we rightly use “beyond reasonable doubt” to try and ensure we do not send innocent people to gaol. I believe this concept has been corrupted in ra…
/r/MensRights07/05/25 11:22 PM
3

In how many of those 5,651 cases was the man found not guilty? These are all possible false allegations. It is worth noting that many alleged rapes are about the issue of consent in that the parties agree that sexual activity occurred but differ as to whether the woman consented. Often the only evidence is the woman’s word as to what occurred. The police will still prosecute these cases. However, where the man is found not guilty, the police will not then prosecute the woman for false allegation…
/r/MensRights07/05/25 11:13 PM
2

The article states the research was scenario based so the survey participants are given scenarios where the man earns more and scenarios where the woman earns more. So the conclusion that women are less satisfied when they earn more than their partner is based on the responses given by women in the scenario where they earn more rather than actual experience of women in this situation. This implies women do not like the idea of this subversion of traditional gender roles and presumably will there…
/r/MensRights06/05/25 09:27 PM
14

I think the issue is that, unlike most other crimes, the only evidence is often the word of one person against the word of another person. Sometimes the alleged crime is many decades old. Personally, I don’t see how the word of one person can be considered to be evidence beyond reasonable doubt given the many miscarriages of justice where a woman has misidentified their alleged rapist or simply made up the claim. The opposing view would be that this approach effectively makes rape unable to be p…
/r/MensRights13/02/25 06:12 PM
2

How many people can put up $1m bail? That’s bullshit when the only evidence was her word.
/r/MensRights19/01/25 09:27 AM
85

Hard to believe he was convicted in the first place. Stupid jury. “Malkinson was identified by the victim in an identity parade. Several key details did not match the description of the perpetrator: for example, she described the attacker as being three inches shorter than Malkinson, with a hairless chest, and no tattoos. Malkinson had chest hair and prominent tattoos on his forearms. She also said the attacker would have a “deep scratch” to his face, which Malkinson did not.. There was no DNA e…
/r/MensRights15/01/25 12:16 PM
9

This sentence is a joke when you consider the sentence the guy would have faced if convicted. Not to mention the impact on him personally if being falsely accused.
/r/MensRights10/01/25 02:01 AM
17

The article says she was due to be released at the half way point of her sentence in February so she has been released a month earlier than the half way point. She has served about 4 years because she was held on remand (i.e. in prison whilst waiting for the trial). Still four years is totally inadequate for what she put those men through.
/r/MensRights06/01/25 10:02 AM
18

Interesting how they proceed with the case on the basis of two people’s word against two people’s word. Will they now prosecute the two women for making a false complaint on the same basis? If not, why not?
/r/MensRights02/01/25 11:41 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter