While I think you're being tad harsh there, I have to agree with you. If the first thing people see when looking at your group is a bunch of hateful conspiracy theorists, that's what they'll think you are. I'm really not sure why I'm still subbed.
Your spelling and grammar sucks. Are you 12? Just because he's not like you doesn't make him wrong? Go fuck yourself. It's people like you who give this movement such a bad name.
India has a rampant false rape problem too. 53% of the cases registered in Delhi were provably false, last year. Considering their current attitude towards rape, I'd be careful about taking those statistics too seriously.
I don't know why you're getting downvoted, you're being perfectly reasonable and level headed, although I can't say I completly agree with you. This is, at least to a degree, a product of modern feminism.
I don't think you understand the concept of a degree. It's not some kind of commodity, it's documentation proving that you you know how stuff works (whatever that "stuff" may be).
It's sad how far down this comment is. The post is little more than a right wing circlejerk about Clinton. I may not be her biggest fan, but that doesn't matter here.
I'd like to ad "Using an argument which can be applied to nearly anything else." Example: Even if guns are made illegal, criminals will still find a way to acquire them. The reason this doesn't work is because one could easily use such logic to legalize everything. (Crack, drunk driving, murder) If you're only justification is that people will do it anyway, it's a shit argument. Edit: I was simply using this as an example. My point was that such argument was a weak one, that's it.