TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

FUPA69 Archive

View 0 posts and 38 comments by FUPA69 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

If you're referring to a physical activity that doesn't involve flexibility or shoving a child out of your cunt, it's always been an insult. Men tend to be better at almost anything physical. That's just how things are.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 06:10 AM
-6

The enactment of rape fantasies is legal.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 06:43 PM
-3

It was my teenage fantasy...
/r/MensRights27/10/14 03:27 PM
1

Don't assume what I would do. I would say exactly the same thing. I've actually said that in previous comments in both this thread and another.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 05:22 PM
2

That's the whole thing. You have yet to define what society considers to be a "real crime." Some of the things that are defined by society as "real crime," are real crime. Murder is a "real crime." And, frankly, piracy is not a "real crime." But there are no actual guidelines from anybody that define what Society actually condones. Society is not the way to define this kind of this thing, it is the same entity that condemns theft (take a candy bar from your nearest 7-11, see what happens as thef…
/r/MensRights03/10/14 05:19 AM
0

The short answer is yes. If you want to read further, do so like I did.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 05:08 AM
1

Immoral is a synonym for unjust. And if you didn't oppose the system, you wouldn't feel that the fact that the system generally awards the women in a sexual assault or custody case to be unfair. This applies to the law in a universal sense. In fact, it is worse in other places than it is in the US. And simply attacking my sanity is an ad hominem fallacy. Didn't we both just get the post a few days ago about that kinda stuff?
/r/MensRights03/10/14 05:02 AM
4

Then neither is the fact that men are blamed in almost every sexual assault case, and rejected in almost every custody case. That's just Society, right? Of course Society is right, why change anything? What Society decides is the "real crime," yeah?
/r/MensRights03/10/14 04:53 AM
-2

And that's still not the point.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 04:42 AM
-3

If you sound like a clone, it's hard to distinguish. Regardless, if you want to speak of a societal contract, let's discuss. If you want to talk about your contract, I will assume you mean the US constitution. If this is the case, you were meant to take up arms against the current government in the face of the current laws, which you believe to be unjust. Where are you? Where is the change you embody? There are so many instances of what you would consider unfair, there are so many examples of pr…
/r/MensRights03/10/14 04:37 AM
2

Actually, if you're going to use anything that you refer to as "society" in an argument, it should be from a scholarly, peer-reviewed source. Otherwise, I am free to interpret it as I may. For all you know, I'm a female Hamas agent from Iraq. This is the internet. You'd better be able to cite what you say. Secondly, you're the one that spoke on behalf of the "public" in the first place. You legitimized the use of the phrase. If you didn't want that, it shouldn't appear in your primary arguments.…
/r/MensRights03/10/14 04:13 AM
-8

You're still arguing from a point that the majority of society would back. Nothing about what you are saying has changed. If you, as an individual, cannot argue why any of these things are particularly immoral, you're not actually saying anything different from what you were originally. Also, at this point, you are still using obscenities and ignoring the fact that sentences are usually begun with a capital letter. Seriously, "u dun yet?"
/r/MensRights03/10/14 03:52 AM
1

What you fail to do is provide a reason other than what you have stated originally. It's all about the same thing. Society agrees that they can't do something. And please try to refrain from obscenities, I know it's hard when you're wrong, but it still doesn't make you right.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 03:30 AM
2

because we, as society, have deemed them incapable of making those decisions rationally you didn't say that?
/r/MensRights03/10/14 03:16 AM
0

Again, I agree. But again, I must say, this is all based on beliefs that simply don't have much to do with me. I agree with what you say on principle. The differences you have listed tend to be statistically correct. And in the situations that you described, these are harmful issues. However, all I can base my response on is how I would react and feel. If 16 year old me were to be approached by two attractive women such as these, I would participate in the sexual activity willingly. That's all I…
/r/MensRights03/10/14 03:08 AM
-2

You wanted to argue about what society holds to be true. I complied. Sorry that hurts your feelings.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 02:33 AM
-9

Do you really mean to silence me simply because we don't agree on a definition? And I'm not sure that you want to base an argument on what our society has agreed upon, because, according to what our society agrees upon, males should never be awarded custody, and should always be paying child support. According to what is agreed upon by society, if someone is drunk, they cannot consent to sex because, they can't comprehend the ramifications of that decision, because they were intoxicated. Unfortu…
/r/MensRights03/10/14 02:08 AM
-1

That's not the point. If the girl wanted it, then there is still no basis for a real crime. Any public outrage toward this occurrence is a societal problem. Doesn't mean that the men in the reversed scenario actually committed any real crime.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 01:24 AM
-3

And something I'd never prove. Regardless, the entire situation is hypothetical, as I'd fuck my boss and be happy about it, as this student was with his teachers. If he were literally raped be a couple of male teachers and wasn't happy about it, a simple rectal exam would prove plenty. It's not the same situation.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 12:13 AM
-8

Being under 18 and being unconscious are not the same thing. If you want to make the age out to be such a huge factor, the age of consent should be 25, the average accepted age at which people's brains are said to be done developing.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 11:40 PM
5

No, but if my boss wanted to fuck me and I said no, I bet I wouldn't be working there much longer. The imbalance remains.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 11:38 PM
-1

Look, all of that is well and good, and I agree with your points. At the end of the day though, this kid doesn't have a problem with what happened to him. If he were a girl and felt the same way, I would say the same thing. The fact that other people do doesn't change my argument. That's society's problem. All I know, is that regardless of what combination of genders of the participants in this particular case, I don't believe the adults should be prosecuted simply because of the age of the "vic…
/r/MensRights02/10/14 11:37 PM
0

Psshh. I'd fuck my boss right now. Doesn't mean it was rape.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 11:28 PM
2

There's another post with a headline that states that they were caught because he was bragging around school.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 11:05 PM
-2

It's not about any of that. It's whether or not it was considered by the "victim" to be a violation. If they don't feel bad about it, neither should anyone else. If they might later, extend the statute of limitations. Then people just need to be careful about how they decide to interact with minors. It puts that responsibility on the adult in the situation without needlessly prosecuting someone that didn't actually hurt anybody at the time.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 10:51 PM
23

Statutory rape is a legal concept. Willing participants are willing participants.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 10:36 PM
33

"They got busted when the student started bragging at school." Doesn't sound like the rape I normally hear about.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 10:14 PM
5

I'm willing to bet he was just fine with this. I know I would have been. Just saying.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 10:12 PM
1

You can't tell me what to do! You're not my dad!
/r/MensRights07/08/14 03:58 PM
0

This cannot be serious. I am a man, and I am aware of the divergence in terms of gender equality, but this: This is fucking stupid. Sometimes, a guy thinks of his little girl as royalty. In fact, seeing as she is a princess, he must be the king. So if anybody's gonna be pissed off, it's the feminists. You're just looking to be butt-hurt about anything you can. Please focus on real issues, for the love of God, or this movement is doomed.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 08:28 AM
1

They do realize that this literally embodies the title of the book, right? Is there really such a mental disconnect here? Why are people like this? I don't want to live on this planet anymore...
/r/MensRights17/06/14 07:41 PM
3

You're right. My statement is still correct.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 07:53 PM
4

He had actually dropped his gear and had knives in both hands at the time of the shooting. Not that the shooting was necessarily justified, but your title is pretty misleading.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 07:20 PM
3

I mean, in the last one's case, it's suicide. Feminists lol
/r/MensRights25/03/14 05:56 AM
2

So close, yet, so far.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 05:04 AM
6

Exactly how many baby-mamas do you have?
/r/MensRights08/07/13 02:44 AM
-12

Directed by M. Night Shyamalan.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 06:12 AM
4

I sure as fuck don't.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 10:17 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter