TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Fabulous-Zombie-4309 Archive

View 0 posts and 272 comments by Fabulous-Zombie-4309 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
28

Since abortion was legalized that is exactly how it has been used.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 03:47 PM
0

If we treated allegations of SA like we treated claims of UFOs or Bigfoot, do you think they'd get it?
/r/MensRights23/05/24 04:57 PM
1

To walk the user down the (twisted) operating logic in the stupid Man over Bear meme. It's taking their rough premise (which we grant only for the sake of argument) and show that they're operating irrationally. Not a big surprise, mind, but still worth observing.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 04:56 PM
1

The guy who they didn't find attractive.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 04:54 PM
2

Thank you for making this comment and exposing the fatal flaw in your 'reasoning'. You conclude your comment by saying, essentially, all bears are dangerous, and I'd rather be around them because having to exercise judgement around men is just too much fucking intellectual work for you.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 04:49 PM
2

So a so-called 'Public Health' organization is worried that talking about men's health (during men's health week) is going to overshadow Pride and Juneteenth? Dude, name and shame.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 06:53 PM
2

Rollo calls is the 'Sisterhood Uber Alles', seems plausible that it is an evolutionary response.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 04:47 PM
3

It is indeed a sexual strategy for a certain class of men.
/r/MensRights17/04/24 01:23 PM
16

https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-toxic-femininity-5222736 It's used to blame men for women's behavior lol
/r/MensRights15/04/24 04:40 AM
16

1) Toxic femininity is literally understood to mean the traits of women that cause women harm; being overly critical of themselves, too trusting of others, etc. 2) Nobody uses toxic femininity in the real world. If you were to do a lexis nexus search my guess is you'd see a 1,000:1 ratio of uses of 'toxic masculinity' v 'toxic femininity'.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 04:38 AM
1

Care to explain?
/r/MensRights08/03/24 08:41 PM
1

When did that sub become FDS? If RedPill and MarriedRedPill got banned there's no reason that r/boysarequirky shouldn't be treated similarly?
/r/MensRights08/03/24 06:49 PM
1

All relationships are transactional. The healthiest ones are where the transaction is hidden to both parties conscious self.
/r/MensRights08/03/24 06:48 PM
1

Grindr came before Tinder because men are innate problem-solvers and Grindr was much more legal/safe than going cruising in public parks and adult book stores.
/r/MensRights06/03/24 07:24 PM
19

She was a left-wing anti-israel nut, this will get ignored immediately.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 04:25 PM
1

End violence by not propagating single mommies and punishing offenders harshly.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 07:42 PM
1

It would be a vacation to merely keep house, which all single men do by default lol
/r/MensRights09/02/24 07:40 PM
12

Yeah people don't understand this is women's nature. Inch = mile. Solipsism and hypergamy are powerful evolutionary forces.
/r/MensRights07/02/24 05:27 PM
9

Bobby go take the trash out, mow the lawn, help dad clean the gutters, carry the groceries, put up the holiday lights, catch the mouse, etc etc etc
/r/MensRights07/02/24 05:26 PM
3

I am raising my son and daughter to understand that the ultimate endpoint in any confrontation or disagreement is physical violence and to remember that when they want to run their mouth. My ex wife used to talk to me in a way that you could tell nobody had ever checked her and she'd laugh it off when I pointed out that she was lucky that I was not a violent person. I'm a big fan of kids getting their ass whupped at least once before high school so they learn the lesson that words can come back …
/r/MensRights07/02/24 05:26 PM
2

It is incredibly uncommon, friend. This is a bit of a meme among women but is classic Apex Fallacy.
/r/MensRights06/02/24 05:09 PM
1

I think he sounds like a volcel who doesn't want to looksmatch. If he's 5'5 and bald he's pulling 6s or very very very short 7s.
/r/MensRights06/02/24 01:13 AM
1

From the beach in a non-extradition country lol
/r/MensRights05/02/24 10:25 PM
29

Yes, because the attorney will let her know you're not fucking around and aren't an easy mark. If she's bullshitting and you have a lawyer it increases the likelihood that she'll backdown and 'remember' who else it could have been that knocked her up or just admit the falsehood. If you go in without a lawyer you're asking for full-on ass grape.
/r/MensRights05/02/24 10:24 PM
2

Your relationships would be functional if you could develop an honest appreciation for your male counterpart and tune down your innate solipsism. Bonus points if you can look the other way if a man has the occasional indiscretion but is otherwise present in the relationship and treats you well.
/r/MensRights05/02/24 10:22 PM
1

You're Apex Fallacy'ing all over yourself. Men want ready access to sex with a woman they find appealing and peace. That's it. Men want sex and peace.
/r/MensRights05/02/24 10:21 PM
1

It's a stand-in term as I believe that people know, innately, who is on their level in terms of SMV. For sure women use more variables to assess men than men do women, but I think most people understand what I'm getting at.
/r/MensRights05/02/24 10:20 PM
2

Of course, I get it. I personally think of porn the same (though I am guilty of that sin), which kind of highlights the 'need' for sex. This is actually why I usually use this line of argumentation with folks who want to declare all things that are 'needs' as fundamental rights. The folks who want my taxes to pay for their abortions would never be OK if we made monthly visits to a brothel a human right, either.
/r/MensRights05/02/24 05:18 PM
2

Interesting call out Prostitution has risks that are less of an issue in sugar relationships. Prostitutes are frequently seeing new johns for sex they haven’t met before, whereas sugar babies are taking time to select a single sugar daddy. Prostitution has a higher STD risk, is often illegal and may include a pimp. It sounds like some of the things the article says about sugaring are probably driven by prostitutes labeling themselves as sugar babies. As an aside, I think it would do well if we g…
/r/MensRights05/02/24 05:01 PM
3

Oh, well that declaration isn't binding and is just more commie social engineering. Go out, do your job, quit bitching. Be better than this my guy. Nobody is arguing that sex is a right (I suppose you are because you think other core aspects of human need are 'rights') what most of us want is just to legalize prostitution so men can get their needs met without having to bed down horrible women who will ruin our lives or risk our personal freedom and safety.
/r/MensRights05/02/24 03:58 PM
8

Oh boy someone hasn't read up on testosterone, have they?
/r/MensRights05/02/24 03:56 PM
1

Women's mating strategies are innate (as are men's), they have not changed. The size of the pool has changed, but the strategy has and will always be the same. AF/BB.
/r/MensRights05/02/24 03:47 PM
1

Regressed isn't the right word. They're optimizing for nature. Men can and should do the same! So what if it's harder, the rewards are: 1) Having a lot of money 2) Being able to protect yourself physically 3) Living longer 4) Never needing to tolerate standard fem BS
/r/MensRights05/02/24 03:46 PM
-2

The 5'5 balding guy can absolutely still get women, but he has to work harder. Ho hum. Either do the work or don't. 6'3 Chad dudes barely exist. Don't fall into the standard feminist apex fallacy. .66% of all men in the US are 20-40yo, unmarried, 6 foot or taller and make $100k or more.
/r/MensRights05/02/24 03:45 PM
1

This is tradcel kyrptonite.
/r/MensRights05/02/24 03:42 PM
2

So you'd commit child abuse rather than just work on yourself so that you can accept your looksmatch?
/r/MensRights05/02/24 03:40 PM
3

Eliot Rogers wasn't an incel, though. Homie was a volcel.
/r/MensRights05/02/24 03:38 PM
4

Of course food isn't a human right (which should tell you how something can be a need but also not something that is a 'right' or entitlement).
/r/MensRights05/02/24 03:37 PM
6

We have an innate, evolved urge to procreate. Sex is absolutely comparable to food for the vast majority of human beings, especially adult males.
/r/MensRights05/02/24 03:36 PM
8

Swift, Mensa member she is not, argues that women making more money is an affront to 'patriarchy'. What she ignores is that a woman with a pot of gold traveling along the road at night is as good as gone without the men enforcing the laws and rules of the society such that she is able to even accumulate her fortune in the first place. Ladies, it has always been and will always be, patriarchy all the way down.
/r/MensRights15/01/24 08:07 PM
7

https://www.forbes.com/advisor/legal/divorce/divorce-statistics/#sources_section Lots of data there and it seems properly cited (though I can't comment on the quality of the sources because there's over a dozen footnotes), but I do kind of chuckle at this level of 'analysis': "Women often carry more of the mental load in a relationship, and also take on a primary caregiving role for children. The added burden they face—especially when they feel their support system is lacking—could help to expla…
/r/MensRights10/01/24 03:47 PM
28

Women do it for attention, men do it to get the job done.
/r/MensRights10/01/24 03:29 PM
32

The funny thing is that women on average treat transwomen the way they do bi-sexual men. They'll often LARP as allies but are usually repulsed when in close social interactions.
/r/MensRights09/01/24 08:47 PM
14

My son is on the spectrum and this scares me to no end. He's very 'normal' in general so I am not expecting it, but I monitor his internet access and try very hard to keep this crap from him.
/r/MensRights09/01/24 08:46 PM
8

Of course the Schrier book got pulled from Target for a time. They know that this is a mental health crisis, they don't care.
/r/MensRights09/01/24 08:45 PM
20

Also hit that self-delete button, IIRC.
/r/MensRights09/01/24 08:43 PM
2

The issue is that blue-pilled folks always read intent into this stuff, which is incorrect. Women just ARE. They're the embodiment of living in a natural state and it is rather fascinating how much men show capacity to evolve from their natural state in contrast to women. Women don't always think "I will only date men for money", they just go with their instincts which, shocker, lead them to pursue a dualistic mating strategy.
/r/MensRights29/11/23 08:35 PM
-4

Nope, this is loser thinking.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 03:38 PM
2

The thing to take from this is when she says "Everybody's happy with it" what she means is "it's ok for you to exist in the world so long as you don't ask anyone out. Just fade into the background and pay for society and we're cool. Ask for a date and you should be pilloried.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 03:21 PM
5

It is better positioned as DIE because that is what organizations that adopt its dogma do.
/r/MensRights13/11/23 08:40 PM
15

The best nugget here is that both these people sound like absolute morons. She's a mentally-ill lunatic and he's a leftist who tweets things about how it's good that police die.
/r/MensRights31/10/23 12:35 PM
1

Ok so you are again playing dumb - you see first-hand that promiscuity correlates positively with anti-social traits?
/r/MensRights04/10/23 04:42 PM
1

You want to know why they're called fuckboys? Because they fuck lots of women. It's literally in the name. Women LOVE fuckboys, that's why they keep fucking.
/r/MensRights04/10/23 04:40 PM
1

So you have the evidence that high promiscuity in women is comorbid with anti-social personality traits, right?
/r/MensRights03/10/23 04:57 PM
1

Again you keep missing the point, it's not that they innately prefer promiscuous men, it's that they innately prefer men who CAN be promiscuous. This predilection for social proof leads to women being less disgusted by 'fuckbois' than men are of 'thots'.
/r/MensRights03/10/23 04:56 PM
19

Women prefer men who can sleep around, and the disgust factor is far far lower for women when considering partners who have been promiscuous v men. Social proof is the big factor there, the idea being that a man who can/has slept around on his merits is clearly a winner. This is also why women are so disgusted by men who see prostitutes, as it 'doesn't count' and is viewed as an end run around their hypergamous nature.
/r/MensRights02/10/23 06:51 PM
16

Yep. My ex and I had a really bad history of conflict in our relationship (got together in early college) and we never learned how to fight, were very childish in how we approached stuff, had altercations that turned physical and threw all kinds of awful insults at one another. Sad shit. During the divorce, she had filed a made-up PO against me in which she claimed to be afraid for her life but not once but several time during the early separation period she came to my new house to sleep with me…
/r/MensRights20/09/23 01:04 PM
1

Bro have you SEEN how women live? None of them cook or clean.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 05:37 PM
35

The sooner we all understand there is no such thing as a satisfied woman, the better. This is why I am committed to never cohabitating again. This way I have my own space and time and she gets to 'miss me' which should increase compliant/pleasant behavioral traits from her. I dated a woman once and the first trip we took together I decided I was going to take a nap after driving the 12 hours to our destination. She got upset saying that she never would have gone on the trip if she knew I'd want …
/r/MensRights15/08/23 03:56 PM
5

From an evo perspective it makes sense - idle men = danger. But we've evolved (largely because our forefathers worked their ass off to build a safer, abundant world) and women still have some innate programming they can't/won't let go.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 03:34 PM
22

I was a SAHD for two kids for a total of five years, one with special needs (Autism). 6-18 months was hard. The rest of it was absolute cake and is one of the best times of my life even if it led to my eventual divorce. When women say being a SAHM is hard, they're full of it unless their child has severe special needs. I was out of the house most days with my child at therapy and doctors and still had time to come home and cook and clean before my ex even left work. Hell, its not like being a SA…
/r/MensRights15/08/23 03:32 PM
59

From their perspective a man with a hobby that brings him pleasure (and can cost a good amount of $) is a man who isn't properly focused on all the things she wants him to do for her. Solipsism is a hell of a drug.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 03:25 PM
37

It's literally the Black Panther for white women. Not just in terms of the plot of the movie but the 'cultural event' which is hilarious because it's putting $1B in the pocket of the very company that is set up as the bad guy in the film.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 03:35 PM
3

Can you re-phrase? I'm not sure I understand your comment.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 03:06 AM
45

The reason they do this is two-fold: 1) it taps into the male desire to be seen as a protector, and 2) it de-emphasizes the reason violence is so scary for women, the fact that they are physically much more vulnerable than men. This allows them to both feel good about themselves by not acknowledging their inherent inequality re: physicality (which they need to deny because nobody wants to vote for leaders they see as weak) while also maintaining persistent victim status. Zero accountability.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 03:17 PM
25

Nothing should terrify us more than men who default to emotion. Look at the way women act as 'nurturers' and being 'emotionally open' and imagine that with a healthy serum testosterone level. It explains why fatherless homes lead to violent boys.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 03:14 PM
3

Roe merely leveled the playing field for men and women in the states that had restrictions tougher than Roe and Casey. Women still have bodily autonomy. In literally every state if they say they were raped they can get a free abortion.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 09:32 PM
10

He's talking about jewish people.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 09:28 PM
3

Are you familiar with the concept of War Brides? Put simply, white women have actively worked to undermine their birth rates and have bought into the idea that demographic shift in the US is inescapable and are looking to retain a seat at the table as being a Fellow Traveler with other 'oppressed' groups.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 09:26 PM
1

If my job is to build the most effective and capable military, I want zero women anywhere near it. Since Vietnam (in the US so forgive for the US bias) there hasn't been a draft and we've lost under 20k troops in combat in the last 51 years. The idea that we need to equalize military participation is exactly what is making our military not be combat-ready. I'm with you that men are essentially disposable when it comes down to conflict and protection, but that's ultimately just nature. It is as i…
/r/MensRights01/08/23 03:36 PM
1

The same thing nature does.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 03:26 PM
1

I think you might be the dumbest person I've ever seen brigade here.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 03:25 PM
1

When the film ends, does it critique the existing system in Barbieland? No. What we get from it is that maybe every night doesn't need to be girls night. That's it. That's the change. No Kens on the Supreme Court, no Kens in houses. Just homeless and back on the beach. Did you notice how there's not a single fat Ken? Theres a fat barbie, a wheelchair barbie, a trans barbie, but no fat Kens. Why?
/r/MensRights01/08/23 02:57 AM
1

Their patron saint is featured in the movie as Alan, played by limp-dick Michael Cera.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 02:54 AM
1

Wait did you just say Ayn Rand, noted objectivist/anti-statist, is a Nazi? Herself a jew?
/r/MensRights01/08/23 02:53 AM
1

100% are solipsistic. Feminism is just a flavor of tea, but all women drink it.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 02:52 AM
2

Meritocracy.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 02:49 AM
1

"opposite of our own" Elaborate.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 02:49 AM
1

Men are accessories in real life. The movie affirms that.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 02:49 AM
1

What house did Ken go back to that evening? Was there any empowered Kens doing work other than being guy-candy? Yeah. Didn't think so.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 02:48 AM
1

It really is fucked, isn't it?
/r/MensRights11/07/23 08:53 PM
7

Been there, done that, have the involuntary sectioning, a diagnosis I had to agree to in order to be let back in my own home, still got the divorce. Be happy you have distance between you, I guess? I'm 2 miles from my ex.
/r/MensRights10/07/23 08:26 PM
1

Ok makes sense. Just was curious because I've seen bait and switch arguments about this before and am always skeptical of this stuff.
/r/MensRights23/06/23 05:56 PM
3

Also anyone who has dated in the last decade or so will tell you that the average woman is completely inept domestically. Further, the average mother PREFERS to spend her time with kids. It's kinda bullshit to cry about doing more with the kids when that's what you specifically prefer to do. I know I preferred to change diapers and play with the kids over cleaning up after my ex and constantly doing chores around the house.
/r/MensRights23/06/23 05:35 PM
3

One thing I've never been completely clear on is whether the average wage used to calculate the 'gap' includes salaried workers or not. Women work less no matter if they are paid hourly or salary, so I can imagine it working out that salaried women are paid more than salaried men as expressed by an hourly rate of hours actually worked, if that makes sense.
/r/MensRights23/06/23 05:33 PM
2

The irony is these are women who had their dads around, by and large. I'm beginning to realize just how much the moms of the last three generations secretly hated the men they chose to marry and have kids with.
/r/MensRights17/06/23 05:04 PM
1

That's commie talk, son. Early birds catch worms and all that. Go take a free course in sales, practice selling yourself. Develop skill. Profit.
/r/MensRights17/06/23 05:03 PM
3

A colleague of mine is talented and smart and has been very active in asking for more money. Her current position is kinda locked in so I told her to come join us in technical sales. Women crush sales roles in general and even more so selling to nerds. She'd do great. She comes to a trade show, and I have to basically push her to do floor demos. She bitches and whines, does it, likes it. Does well at it. Three months later we offered her a position, same pay model as is standard for presales, $1…
/r/MensRights17/06/23 05:00 PM
13

Pretending to be afraid is a great way to control men. They “quiver” when a man raises his voice so he has to always guard against expressing his emotions. And she’s bottled him up and has the upper hand. This is such a great point, and also highlights the hollowness of the "men should be more emotional", as if emotional men are anything but a threat to the rest of us.
/r/MensRights16/06/23 03:30 AM
19

A while back JBP and Camile Paglia had a conversation about this and JBP brought up that men know, on some level, that conflict with other males has a final destination at violence. So it behooves men to consider prior to engaging in conflict their ability to either reason another man down or ultimately be able to defend themselves. Women don't innately understand that escalation ends in violence and are far more likely to run wild with their words because they are protected from the consequence…
/r/MensRights16/06/23 03:29 AM
13

My ex loved to use cameras and recordings as threats. I recall one time I was asleep in bed next to my then five yo son, she woke me up to berate me about something like not taking the trash out, not even caring that our child was sleeping there in bed. I went downstairs to get the conversation and noise away from him and then she whipped the phone out "say it to the camera that you called me the n-word, you just called me the n-word in front of our black son" (I'm white, she's mixed-race, our k…
/r/MensRights16/06/23 03:23 AM
3

Yeah similar to lying to police is not a crime until you're sworn in.
/r/MensRights24/05/23 06:54 PM
-3

Close - women are more emotional and lead with emotion because...that is woman's natural condition, on the average.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 07:50 PM
2

Group sexual assault is also a non-entity in the US.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 05:47 PM
3

Go watch the videos of her at parties on YouTube, the woman is clearly there for the attention and brags about being the town bicycle. Boys - if its too good to be true, it probably is.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 05:44 PM
3

You should go see her talking about her first sexual experiences as a 14 year old. Girl is certifiable so of course she's judgement-free.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 05:43 PM
3

Incentives are so far out of balance, there isn't really a thing he can do. If he sues her she isn't able to pay him for the money he lost let alone the reputational damage done. So maybe that Seinfeld bit where the guy was sentenced to be their butler isn't a terrible idea? lol
/r/MensRights09/05/23 05:38 PM
42

Kotaku just posted a front-page article mocking a former incel who finally got laid and it seems pretty clear to me the reality is that there is little to no empathy for men and their sexuality.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 04:21 PM
5

A lot of guys deal with this reconditioning of their libido after toxic relationships. A buddy of mine says his wife is constantly complaining about their lack of sex but she always brings it up after another six-hour argument/complaint session.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 04:32 PM
1

You know what kind of women are deeply involved with religious orgs? Born again virgins, that's who. You're better off opting for a low to no mileage woman two or three rungs below you in terms of SMV or just get used to jerking off.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 04:29 PM
6

Something to chew on here - if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. Getting propositioned by a woman you and your wife both are attracted to with a threesome on vacation is essentially winning the lottery type of odds. Ask yourself - what if this is a setup? What if this is a scam? At best, at absolute best, this woman is an insane person, possibly a cheater (and we know the best way to get out of being held accountable for infidelity is to allege assault), or a scammer and is going to…
/r/MensRights05/05/23 04:13 PM
8

But the real clanger is that this reveals an entrenched culture of misandry, a belief that men are less human than women. These feminist pigs place so little value on men, masculinity, and fatherhood, they really believe that any available male, or any male who meets the requirements of the mother, can replace a real father (living or dead). Fathering is reduced to animal husbandry in feminist dialogue. This needs to be said over and over and over again until men wake up to this point.
/r/MensRights01/05/23 01:26 PM
3

ehh i'd be careful with this. In most places (I think OP is outside US) self-defense comes with some general expectation that the person tried to remove themself first before responding, and/or that the response was proportional. Let's be honest, if a judge sees a 5'2 woman slapped or pushed a 6'2 man, and that man responded to it with a hard backhand, most people will view the response as being disproportionate because of the size/strength difference.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 03:30 PM
1

In the RP/Manosphere its common to see discussion about passing shit tests but at my age and my relative station in life (already have two great kids, have a good job and some money) that I don't give af about 'passing' a test. You play games you get demoted/dumped.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 03:28 PM
2

The number one thing you need to hear (like really, listen and internalize) is get as far away from her as possible. No contact (or as little as is reasonably possible, if there are children involved) and stay out of her orbit. You fucked up each and every time you didn't leave when she treated you like shit, you fucked up when that escalated to violence, and you royally, royally fucked up when she showed you she'd involve the cops and you stayed. Now you responded and you're a man facing a woma…
/r/MensRights20/04/23 03:25 PM
1

Passport Bros been taking a page out of Eat Pray Love and Stella Gets Her Groove Back forreal.
/r/MensRights10/04/23 11:09 PM
1

Ok you just explained racial profiling. Feel good about yourself?
/r/MensRights21/03/23 07:42 PM
13

Once you see the code in the matrix, it is hard to avoid seeing it everywhere. The signaling thing is dead on, coupled with the incentives in society for being a victim. For boring-ass white women being a victim of sexual trauma is a way to be accepted into the non-white male club now (and it isn't just straight guys, gay white men are lower on the totem pole than 'victims').
/r/MensRights21/03/23 07:41 PM
1

There is no way in which repeated complements lead to trauma unless that person is already a few french fries short of a happy meal. Frankly this is why we need to look at repealing the 19th.
/r/MensRights21/03/23 07:38 PM
2

All respect to poster, but there is a clinical definition of trauma and it requires quite a bit more than just say so. The challenge with psychology, at least as it is practiced now, is that people just make up symptoms because many of the symptoms are similar. I had hoped that a plague would shock some people out of the navel-gazing "my truth" mentality, but no luck there.
/r/MensRights21/03/23 07:36 PM
2

I think you misunderstand my point, or maybe I didn't communicate it clearly - it is absolutely women's nature to behave this way, and it is men's nature to fuck anything that moves. Odd that in a 'patriarchy' one is criminalized and the other is protected.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 02:26 AM
3

I'm saying marriage is a hostage situation.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 02:24 AM
2

Alimony (properly referred to Spousal Support in the US) can be either permanent (typically long-married, never-worked spouse) or restorative (when the spouse who doesn't/hasn't worked can work and is given support for a finite period of time, typically a year). Child Support is a scam and is mandatory, you will be paying it no matter what if you make more money/have kids less than 50/50. Even if you agree to a lesser amount should your ex refile for an adjustment they can sometimes seek back su…
/r/MensRights08/02/23 12:52 AM
1

That's marriage, dude.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 12:49 AM
-2

It is 100% in women's evolutionary benefit to react negatively to men showing signs of weakness.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 12:47 AM
-1

It is NOT conditioning from society. It is evolutionary psychology. Weak men = death.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 12:46 AM
7

Yep. DeSantis is a politician first and foremost, he his not based in the way many hope he is.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 12:45 AM
4

It is all they do. Hip thrusts for the camera because some influencer told them it makes your booty bigger.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 08:14 PM
7

Because it isn't bigoted. It might be out of fashion, but it confers no hate.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 04:45 PM
4

I belong to a powerlifting/bodybuilding gym and then the regular "family" gym and my fellow meatheads are just nicer overall. The 'family' gym has a weightroom that is overrun with a dozen college-aged women all standing in line for benches and racks to do their species' only exercise, the hip thrust.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 04:43 PM
8

Yeah I've noticed that lately, too. My boss/mentor and I will hit up the cigar speakeasy when we're in town together and have noticed a lot of women in these spaces. On one occasion a woman was asking the proprietor if they couldn't limit the number of patrons so as to make it 'less smokey', I shit you not.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 04:39 PM
19

Because women ridicule men when they discuss their problems, because women demand accommodations and special treatment in men's spaces, and because women introduce a level of chaos to male-only spaces that fundamentally changes the dynamic of an environment. Any place there are men and women, there will be some reversion to hierarchical performance, peacocking, etc. Its drama drama and sometimes you just want to get away from that.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 04:35 PM
1

Do you still consider yourself to be a 'radical left' persona? I'm very curious about how you got RP'd, it seems like there is probably a lot more men that dealt with the nonsense despite being 'allies' and I wonder how many realized this kind of groupthink is in the DNA of left/collective political theory.
/r/MensRights02/02/23 08:04 PM
2

Honestly I suspect your grasp of the English language is developing, hence the strong response. 'Coming out' implies that a person is revealing something they've hidden. Men in the US (and I assume globally in many countries) have to hide their feelings about the MRM and male/female dynamics because our culture here in the States *IMMEDIATELY* labels you as a toxic, potentially violent misogynist the moment you say "hey maybe we should pass a law that presumes shared custody in divorce cases?" T…
/r/MensRights02/02/23 07:59 PM
1

Acting like what? The vast majority of women fall into the meat of the bell curve that prioritizes masculine traits when selecting a mate.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/23 04:55 PM
1

You're talking about living for the 1/99 odds, which is asinine.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/23 11:13 PM
6

Careful of speaking in absolutes, but I think you understand that I'm pointing out the principle, even if it doesn't happen all that much in the wild.
/r/MensRights16/01/23 09:04 PM
1

When people hear things that make them upset and they can't argue with, they often respond emotionally and dismissively. Its an evobio thing. Fascinating.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/23 09:03 PM
1

This is pretty classic personalization/emotional blackmail. Its sort of like saying that if my obese cousin Barry found out I called him obese online, wouldn't I be sad? Is it true or is it not? Women have exponentially larger pools of possible sexual partners than men do, it makes no sense to personalize it and make someone feel guilt or shame for pointing out moms and granny probably got down back in the day.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/23 09:02 PM
1

Bzzzt. Women are never happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/23 08:57 PM
1

A small percent of the population of males decides to transition to live as women. How can there be men who want to be women and others who want to be men?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/23 08:57 PM
1

The super-majority of women loathe 'submissive men', this is why so-called 'gamma' males piss them off so much.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/23 08:56 PM
1

Honestly if you consider the rate of single-motherhood, odds are that mom and grandma were in the streets years ago. We just didn't see it memorialized forever on the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/23 08:55 PM
1

The standard distribution comes for us all, hon. Women make 80% of household purchasing decisions and are most active on social media. Stop with this "NAWALT". It doesn't need to be all to be many or most.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/23 08:54 PM
1

Are you advocating men look for romantic partners within their own family units?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/23 08:53 PM
4

Girlfriends are universally > wives. Never get married, because marriage signals to a woman that she has won and can stop playing the game.
/r/MensRights16/01/23 08:35 PM
8

An unemployed/low-income man is absolutely getting benefits from being married. An ugly man who strikes out 99% of the time with women is benefitting from regularish access to a woman, an so on.
/r/MensRights16/01/23 08:33 PM
20

Yep, ghost-hunting 1000%
/r/MensRights11/01/23 04:35 AM
6

Is this a bit?
/r/MensRights11/01/23 04:35 AM
3

It is a lie.
/r/MensRights11/01/23 04:33 AM
-8

You ARE sexual objects.
/r/MensRights10/01/23 02:24 AM
0

So you're a woman? /s
/r/MensRights10/01/23 02:17 AM
12

BJJ gonna stop getting sucker-punched with a bowling ball my G?
/r/MensRights08/01/23 07:14 PM
7

Keep telling 'em until they get it. There is no such thing as 'toxic masculinity' because masculinity is not toxic.
/r/MensRights08/01/23 07:13 PM
11

The general legal standard is that you can use one level above to end a threat. This is why people get shot by cops all the time, if you swing on them with a pipe there's not much else they can do but shoot you. If its pushing and shoving you can get a punch or two to scare them off but if they come back for more you can escalate until the threat ends. Of course the problem is how people will interject if its male on female, which is why arguing with a woman anywhere (but especially in public) i…
/r/MensRights08/01/23 07:13 PM
14

So if a dude swings on me and keeps coming after me I can't beat the brakes off of him? I gotta stop or am I allowed to put him to bed?
/r/MensRights08/01/23 07:11 PM
25

If she is swinging a 10 pound bowling ball at me, she's getting dropped until she's out. Full stop.
/r/MensRights08/01/23 07:10 PM
1

That is *not* what makes rail workers a de facto protected class in the US, m8. That Congress can intervene in their labor dispute and award benefits unilaterally based off of rules from the early 20th century is what accomplishes that. The idea that workers should have rights to benefits and compensation beyond what they can themselves negotiate is a sign that labor unions are just another cartel worth busting.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 08:46 PM
1

We do have worker rights; and rail workers are essentially a protected class in the US.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 03:59 PM
1

Why do they harp on sick pay when the proposed bargaining agreement includes an expansion of the PTO policy?
/r/MensRights30/11/22 03:59 PM
2

Do you think humans have the right to defend themselves?
/r/MensRights29/11/22 04:38 PM
1

This is a math problem, friend. If we assume that behavior is distributed across a population somewhat evenly, the number of mass shooters should be committed roughly 1:1 with representation in the general population. In this example, white men commit somewhere around 50% of all mass shootings, while whites are 65% of the population. This means whites are *underrepresented* if we're comparing via race. Of course multivariate analysis is preferable, so if we drill down by race and sex we do see t…
/r/MensRights29/11/22 04:30 PM
2

The vast majority of mass shootings in the US involve criminal-on-criminal violence. Criminals using illegally-obtained guns to commit illegal acts. Let us make more things illegal and that'll work, I'm sure of it.
/r/MensRights29/11/22 04:18 PM
2

You try finding a 'stable' relationship with the 304s the young boys are dealing with now.
/r/MensRights29/11/22 04:16 PM
2

On a per capita basis mass shooting incidents happen at similar or worse rates in the Eurozone.
/r/MensRights29/11/22 04:15 PM
1

happened recently Re: #1, it is also possible that too many men are surviving into adulthood that in our evolutionary past would not have made it past adolescence. Consider the number of weak, ineffective men you know in your own lives that you know could never have survived what our forebears did. Not a happy thought, I know, but to me it indicates we need to do *more* to teach young men healthy masculine behavior, as opposed to the approach we've taken the last half century.
/r/MensRights29/11/22 04:12 PM
2

It is absolutely a known side effect of many SSRIs that suicidal ideation and dissociative thoughts get *Worse* when you begin treatment, and only improve when (if) you get to some kind of standard level in your blood.
/r/MensRights29/11/22 03:54 PM
1

I agree it is probably the most darkly rational of all the pills one might take, even if I think we should resist it in general if there's any hope for a healthy future. One can still be RP-aware, be vigilant, be self-sufficient, and not succumb to the darkness.
/r/MensRights22/09/22 04:35 PM
3

I would argue women that deny their committed partners sexual access are being abusive and partners have a right to expect their monogamous partners to make that a priority (both directions) and if you withdraw sexual access you should simply exit the relationship. Makes no sense to force someone to give you all the things you want (commitment, attention, resources, etc) and you not provide them the one thing they need.
/r/MensRights22/09/22 04:33 PM
1

Which is essentially all of them.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 01:02 AM
1

Nature is a major source of 'expectation'. Not masculinity. Masculinity is a response to the natural need for men to protect the vulnerable as we evolved to do.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 01:02 AM
2

Toxic masculinity, defined by the academy, says "these things make men bad". Toxic femininity, as defined by the same people, say "these things make women victims (and its patriarchy's fault). There is no such thing as 'toxic' masculinity. There is toxicity, and there are specific ways in which men are toxic, but there is no aspect of masculinity that is toxic.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 01:01 AM
1

https://www.forbes.com/sites/karinagness/2016/04/12/dont-buy-into-the-gender-pay-gap-myth/?sh=56e0736b2596 The linked article breaks down the fallacious number put forth by the Obama Administration, and demonstrates that the poster above was correct. It was not 'decision-adjusted', it was simply median earnings for men and women.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 12:56 AM
8

Lift weights, learn to defend yourself. The world owes you neither understanding or love.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 01:24 AM
1

I mean, I’ve seen some guys here saying that women should actually embrace submissive roles and not consider it oppression. That’s not an attitude I’m here to champion Women tell men what they should do all the flippin' time. A suggestion isn't an order.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 01:22 AM
1

If the shoe fits, man.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 01:21 AM
0

Its a hack documentary, it did nothing to actually understand TRP and MRAs were all too happy to let TRP take the beating and the bans from platforms like Reddit.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 01:20 AM
1

Do you have a custody order? Does said order not include rules around parent/child communication? Where is your lawyer in all of this?
/r/Divorce_Men17/08/22 04:01 PM
1

Refusing to use a $12/month app (that is free if you meet income requirements) is not exactly reasonable, especially considering it means the Courts, attorneys, etc. can all access the info w/o having to go through hours of billable work.
/r/Divorce_Men17/08/22 04:00 PM
1

Beg, borrow, steal. Ok, not steal, unless you count borrowing from my 401(k) and losing time in the market for the measly 2% I get when I pay it back. Borrowed $10k from an uncle, I could ask for more but he's got dementia and I'd feel better if his money was spent on his own care than my shitty divorce. Pulled about $20k out of retirement, most of it via 401(k) loans but some was from a ROTH I had to clear out anyway because my ex and I make above IRS limits for ROTH contributions.
/r/Divorce_Men15/08/22 05:53 PM
2

How will having sex with her brother help things?
/r/Divorce_Men11/08/22 05:18 PM
1

If the rest of this jizz-wich wasn't the obvious troll, this was the dead giveaway: I'm under the impression that the second I leave I'll be swimming in assorted cooch by the end of the week.
/r/askMRP04/08/22 05:16 PM
2

If you make no money you don't need a will or a durable power of attorney, my man.
/r/Divorce_Men29/07/22 02:06 PM
1

So basically the government socially engineers benefits that the taxpayer pays for. That's what you're afraid of losing? Wifey can get a job, m8. Also: some of those rights apply to non-married persons. Like custody, for example. I have a right to see my kids if I'm married or not.
/r/Divorce_Men29/07/22 02:05 PM
4

Look there isn't an IQ requirement for this sub, ok? lol
/r/Divorce_Men29/07/22 02:01 PM
1

Do you think kids should be given puberty blockers?
/r/Divorce_Men29/07/22 01:55 PM
1

Please list all the 'marriage rights'. We'll wait.
/r/Divorce_Men29/07/22 01:54 PM
1

The answer is hell no but religious folk have a strong aversion to seeing reality contradict church doctrine. Bro needs Rational Male Vol4 to understand just how much the Church is captured and gynocentric.
/r/Divorce_Men29/07/22 01:54 PM
5

The funny thing is the court will order you to use an app (usually Our Family Wizard) for communication, which has a whole-ass payment/expense module inside it and it allows for approvals/receipts, etc. It would be so much easier to set it up using that or something like SAP Concur or Expensify and then require reimbursement as opposed to just adding to the other parent's bottom line.
/r/Divorce_Men29/07/22 01:52 PM
1

A durable power of attorney will cost you like $400.
/r/Divorce_Men29/07/22 01:50 PM
1

Bro the losers at Reddit banned the (positive, helpful) TRP sub.
/r/Divorce_Men29/07/22 01:50 PM
7

Red dot does that for you lol
/r/Divorce_Men29/07/22 01:49 PM
4

When I lost my job and was on unemployment for a few months while sorting out a few offers the State decided the kids were worth an extra $14 a week in unemployment compensation. In divorce, they've decided the kids are worth $700 a week. Funny, innit?
/r/Divorce_Men29/07/22 01:49 PM
2

Yep this is why I remind TradCons they're part of the problem, too. Its these allegedly 'pro-family' policies that they push to give tax breaks for married couples, kids, etc. Social engineering via the tax code is BS.
/r/Divorce_Men29/07/22 01:46 PM
1

They've gotten better, actually. It used to be much worse. The concept of alimony has largely disappeared from Western legal theory. Spousal Support awards are generally time-locked now.
/r/Divorce_Men29/07/22 01:43 PM
5

Otherwise, they will walk. Let 'em, there's billions out there.
/r/Divorce_Men29/07/22 01:42 PM
2

If you were to set it up as a financial investment, getting married is like playing Gamestop and Tesla options you bought high on crack at 2am. There can be an upside (every time I look at my kids, I pull back from thinking that I wish I never met her) but man that downside is steep.
/r/Divorce_Men29/07/22 01:41 PM
5

As Rollo calls it, the Sisterhood Uber Alles.
/r/Divorce_Men29/07/22 01:39 PM
2

Not for nothing but...uh... mom is 41?
/r/Divorce_Men29/07/22 01:39 PM
3

Yeah this is something that I try to remind myself. I have only seen my kids once this summer (this week's vacation got messed up when I came down with Covid) but when I had the kids on Tuesday my son kept saying that he didn't want to go back to mom's the next day and that he thinks she's trying to stop them from seeing me. It can be very hard keeping calm in those situations but I realize the kids are watching.
/r/Divorce_Men24/07/22 05:55 PM
2

Whatever the outcome is, which is most likely bad.
/r/Divorce_Men23/07/22 02:42 AM
2

"It isn't that every woman will, it is that every woman could." Mine used a shock TRO when I was pro se immediately after filing the divorce (huge mistake on my part, but live and learn) and the judge suggested I consent to entry with no finding of abuse because it would go away in a year but if the final RO was upheld I could never have it shielded. From that she twisted my arm to get preferred custody (thank god no support order) which meant that when we saw the magistrate for the PL hearing I…
/r/Divorce_Men08/07/22 07:25 PM
3

Impossibly easy and basically you're guaranteed to receive the TRO which in most states will last for a week until the final order hearing. My ex has gotten so good at filing these things that she's learning, like a velociraptor. The first one she did on a weekend, which is considered an Emergency RO and only lasts until the temp hearing on the first court day after the weekend. I didn't get served but her dumb ass told me she filed the order so I made sure to be present at the TRO hearing, whic…
/r/Divorce_Men08/07/22 07:21 PM
3

In my state every violation of the order is another 30 days in jail and they stack up quick. When my ex filed a (false) child abuse claim I knew immediately I needed to basically turn my phone off. My kids called and texted multiple times a day telling me they missed me and why did I stop taking their calls but I knew I couldn't risk violating the order by responding to a text or even accidentally picking up the phone. God I hate that woman.
/r/Divorce_Men08/07/22 07:16 PM
3

I filed for divorce after my negotiations with my STBXW's lawyer broke down re: going to mediation. My ex told me to my face "I'm not going to mediation because I'll never agree to shared custody", so I filed for divorce immediately while staying in the home because I'm not getting hit with an abandonment claim. Three days later? TRO, thank God I had an apartment already. Blew all of my savings buying furniture so I didn't need to sleep on the floor and had fortunately been moving some personal …
/r/Divorce_Men08/07/22 07:14 PM
2

I'm honestly shocked he wasn't escorted out immediately if this was a legit service.
/r/Divorce_Men08/07/22 07:12 PM
1

If you were served (which it sounds like you were, confirm who is legally authorized to provide service, it is generally either a process server or in TRO cases someone from the Sheriff's department. If it was her sister/cousin/auntie, I would strongly suggest reaching out to the clerk's office and getting more info) then it is in effect the second you receive the paperwork, which is why I'm a little confused how you're not out on your ass at the moment to even ask this question. Police are orde…
/r/Divorce_Men08/07/22 07:11 PM
3

Watch it like a hawk. Work on yourself, yes, but if that is your kid you need to be their defender even if you aren't there 24/7. If she is seeing a married man you need to sue for custody, request an emergency hearing and then put it on the record. Go scorched earth. The most likely person to kill, injure or sexually abuse your child is an unrelated male. "Letting it go" is the LAST thing you should do.
/r/Divorce_Men08/07/22 05:24 AM
2

The other example that usually helps guys understand the "Light Switch Effect" is an experience EVERY man who has slept near a woman for a while has dealt with: the dream in which you cheated on her. Every guy has woken up to a cold shoulder and angry stares, which usually leads to a lot of echoing Jimmy McNulty, asking "the fuck did *I* do?" before she tells you (usually hours later when you're at work and your boss is up your ass about something) "I had a dream and you cheated on me!" Their em…
/r/Divorce_Men07/07/22 02:09 AM
1

That is 100% the 'logic' that goes through women in the alpha re-interest phase, aka the Eat, Pray, Loeave phase.
/r/Divorce_Men07/07/22 02:06 AM
5

Read The Rational Male series (book 1 is a lot of info so it might make sense to read it in chunks but by the time you get to book 3 the world will look a LOT different to you).
/r/Divorce_Men07/07/22 02:04 AM
3

Exactly. Nobody out in the pretend world wants to admit this but there's never been a woman in history who left a stable living situation w/o a plan for the future, outside of severe mental health issues (and in that case she probably was testing branches in her mouth for a good portion of the relationship anyway).
/r/Divorce_Men07/07/22 02:03 AM
3

Dude did you beat your wife? Emotionally abuse her? Threaten her? User her for money? No, it sounds like you didn't. This whole "could not connect" thing is prioritizing HER feelings over yours. It sounds like you're a people-pleaser and right now its easier to hate yourself than it is to realize your wife is telling you that she isn't going to put the effort in to stay married (at 50, so she's well past the wall years) and you should say "ok honey, can I help you pack?" Do not ask to stay with …
/r/Divorce_Men07/07/22 02:01 AM
1

Bwahaha talk about leaning into the persona. Asking you if you've asked your wife or her boyfriend as to why she has stopped sleeping with her (apparently very distraught over Roe) husband is trying to lead you to some epiphany that she's getting it, even if it isn't from you. If it feels like an attack, I think this also explains why you're not getting any.
/r/Divorce_Men06/07/22 07:40 PM
1

Worst part is 90% of the stuff was returned anyway, which was a whole other process lol
/r/Divorce_Men06/07/22 07:38 PM
1

Why are you ok with, no, desiring your wife to have the right to kill your child in the womb?
/r/Divorce_Men06/07/22 02:14 AM
2

Frankly being unable to keep a relationship due to political differences is a female problem. No adult male who has any frame in his relationship gives one fuck about his partner's politics outside of possible fears of violent activities. Maybe.
/r/Divorce_Men06/07/22 02:13 AM
1

if you say things like "anti-fascist" without any irony, you're a leftist.
/r/Divorce_Men06/07/22 02:12 AM
1

Lol wow please leave the casino.
/r/Divorce_Men06/07/22 02:11 AM
2

Have you spoken with her about it? With her boyfriend?
/r/Divorce_Men06/07/22 02:11 AM
2

TradCons are not our friends in this, not one bit. They are themselves committed to a "if its gone bad, a man is somehow responsible", which is why in all this Roe v Wade stuff most Trads still refuse to point any finger at women, its all about how men need to 'step up'.
/r/Divorce_Men06/07/22 02:09 AM
5

Yeah if you don't make it worse it shouldn't take more than 30 minutes a day to keep things inspection-ready. My STBXW used to order so much from Amazon and other stores I felt like I had taken a second job at UPS.
/r/Divorce_Men06/07/22 02:08 AM
2

Coach Greg Adams says it best: men have two options in divorce. Either you fight like hell and do whatever it takes to get your kids or you lie down and hope that the kids don't hate you when you're older. Its your conscience you have to live with.
/r/Divorce_Men01/07/22 03:36 AM
2

If you get them in the summer this is now when you file for a modification and you hire a lawyer who will get into her shit re: care plan and such. No fucking way can she actually be present while on-base like that.
/r/Divorce_Men01/07/22 03:35 AM
1

Yep, CA is miserable and he needs a lawyer ASAP.
/r/Divorce_Men01/07/22 03:33 AM
1

She was getting destroyed by every lance corporal and private in her unit. You're going to hate her for a while but what you need to do is channel that energy into HIRING A FUCKING LAWYER and seeking custody,
/r/Divorce_Men01/07/22 03:33 AM
5

I will not say you're an "idiot", many of us enter into this situation with a degree of naive optimism because we remember liking and loving our wives. When you see them do shit that actively hurts the kids and hurts you, it is like its Groundhog Day and each day you wake up to someone shitting in your bed, Amber Heard-style. It can be a mindfuck. What you need to do is talk to a lawyer and seek custody now.
/r/Divorce_Men01/07/22 03:31 AM
2

Do not DIY divorce if she is truly a "terrible human being".
/r/Divorce_Men01/07/22 03:20 AM
0

I don't want women to be a thing they cannot actually be. I can't call a married or otherwise taken woman at 4am when I'm in a car wreck and need support. I can't call my best girl friend to come over at 1am when dealing with a breakup or whatever. My buddies, my bros? Hell yeah they'll be there. Because they're standup guys. Women don't do that for men, but you can be damn sure that they call my ass when the guys ghosted them or when they need help moving. Orbiter shit.
/r/Divorce_Men29/06/22 06:44 PM
-1

Men cannot and should not be friends with women. It is a servile relationship. Women cannot be true friends to men, they just can't.
/r/Divorce_Men29/06/22 06:35 PM
4

But she's getting railed and nailed on the reg in that house? Bro please think about this.
/r/Divorce_Men29/06/22 06:33 PM
3

What, she tripped, fell, and landed on his dick?
/r/Divorce_Men29/06/22 06:32 PM
0

Bro this is cuck shit. She's going to be getting railed by a million dudes as she rides the cock carousel and you want to stick around?
/r/Divorce_Men29/06/22 06:32 PM
1

I burned myself out taking care of two kids and a very ill set of in-laws. All that 'choreplay' and my STBXW still hates my ass and would pull power plays all of the time. $15k trips to Disney, tummy-tucks and lipo for her? All good. Me spending $40 a month on hobbies? Go sleep on the couch. Tell her I wasn't sleeping on the couch? Get put out in the street or else she was going to call the cops. I was sleeping in my car for a couple days a month at some points, but always expected to be back ho…
/r/Divorce_Men29/06/22 06:31 PM
4

Trust us, sell the damn house. Edit to elaborate: I have a special needs kid and I had always hoped the home would be something we could pass down to him in the event he isn't able to work full time and support himself. I have always been fine with her maintaining use and possession of the home for a long-ass period (in my state the max the court can order is 3 years but I've offered upwards of a decade; until the kids are college-aged) knowing full well my basis in the home will be minimal with…
/r/Divorce_Men29/06/22 06:18 PM
2

This, all of this.
/r/Divorce_Men29/06/22 06:14 PM
3

Oh no, she almost certainly stopped loving you years ago (if you're lucky) but most likely never really loved you the way you loved her.
/r/Divorce_Men29/06/22 06:14 PM
3

More people need to hear this and internalize it. If a spouse brings up either divorce or suicide in an argument, it is a manipulation and it needs to be called out, the conversation put on timeout until you're both able to meet with a therapist together.
/r/Divorce_Men29/06/22 06:13 PM
0

Not for nothing but family law attorneys rarely want to go to court. Its a lot of work, a lot of pain, and even more aggravation dealing with obnoxious clients. The fastest way to get a bad rep in divorce court is to be a law firm who always litigates.
/r/Divorce_Men27/06/22 07:14 PM
2

This is a big part of it, yep. Going to court is often an emotional decision, not a rational one. My STBXW is refusing mediation and is determined to go to trial despite her making more than me, my being a stay at home dad for almost a decade, etc etc because...reasons? In the end if I want to force her out of the house or to hang on for the last penny of her pension statutorily allowed it's going to happen in court, most likely. Settlement is the best way to get someone to compromise but alas.
/r/Divorce_Men27/06/22 07:12 PM
1

over worked and gave up quality of life and now regret that, 600% it isn't the working they regret.
/r/Divorce_Men27/06/22 07:09 PM
1

You are able to claw back those mortgage payments towards your basis in the home's equity.
/r/Divorce_Men27/06/22 07:08 PM
2

On the whole I think you're correct. Many states are better about custody cases, but the system still incentivizes bad behavior, and it is very very hard to shake that out.
/r/Divorce_Men27/06/22 07:06 PM
1

The courts are still strongly biased in custody cases towards mom. The other reason you see so many people in court is because every person is entitled to their day in court, even if it isn't advisable. It only takes one of the two parties to be unreasonable for everyone to end up in court. Another thing to think about re: out of balance settlements especially on this sub, is that in my experience many men are just so anxious to get it all wrapped up they give up waaaaaaay too much in settlement…
/r/Divorce_Men27/06/22 07:05 PM
6

She will not be sensible, so please be good with going to court. In my situation I got outplayed by my STBXW because I was a sentimental moron and she maneuvered things and ginned up a false abuse allegation prior to me hiring a lawyer and I've been playing defense ever since. The one truism that I lean on is that you don't truly know someone until you divorce them. My STBXW filed a BS abuse claim, then the next day told me she wanted me to come home (and like a moron I did) then threw me out wh…
/r/Divorce_Men27/06/22 07:00 PM
9

Without prejudice and know that you are avenging the millions of men destroyed by the divorce machine.
/r/Divorce_Men27/06/22 06:55 PM
10

Honestly dude your STBXW sounds like a potential false abuse case waiting to happen. Please document the shit out of everything, consider body cameras and for the love of God get everything she says in writing or recorded. It's expensive, but consider doing a joint mental health evaluation, she sounds unstable and the prospect of being evaluated by the court (and forced to pony-up her share of the costs) might shake her into reality again.
/r/Divorce_Men27/06/22 06:54 PM
1

A 30s woman has a smaller pool to choose from if the goals are reproduction and long term commitment. I think what is fascinating is the intense emotional response to well-understood/observed patterns that I would expect from someone who isn't fully understanding the 'what' and 'why' of the red pill. Read Rollo's first book and come back to this discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 08:13 PM
1

The red pill is understanding what men and women innately prioritize and the natural timeline for mating decisions, among other things. In this context, a man who is 30 and marries a 28 year old is marrying a woman in her epiphany phase, which means she's already given her best years to the streets (speaking in averages here) meanwhile the male is near his peak SMV. A more natural match would be a man who is 30-35 and a woman who is 21-25. The real game-change is understanding the impact of HBC …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 05:40 PM
1

That's your interpretation of those terms and definitions, but I would argue you're attempting to turn things into an ideology when it is not that. It is an understanding that female nature prioritizes ABC and employs behaviors DEF to achieve their goals, if subconsciously. Its not a value judgment against women any more than it is a value judgement when we observe male sexual strategy prefers unlimited access to unlimited sexuality (ie men as dogs). The goal is to provide terms and concepts in …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 05:04 PM
1

I think the foundational text in TRP spaces is The Rational Male, and that is decidedly NOT the emphasis. Have you read the book or any of Rollo's work?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 04:51 PM
1

RP understanding suggest that men shouldn't get married (in general) until they're 30+ because that is when they have demonstrated competence (hopefully) and will therefore find their best match, which is a woman in her mid to late 20s. This is the most complimentary match when you consider male and female mating priorities. Nobody in TRP suggests men get married at 20 to another 20 yo. In reality, the suggestion is that men spin plates until they are 30 so they can better understand there is no…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 02:31 PM
1

What you are describing has nothing to do with RP whatsoever. Please go read the Rational Male and watch any of Rollo's content. RP is not an ideology or philosophy, it is a praxeology and seeks to describe intersexual dynamics through an understanding of innate behavior and the motivations for said behavior on an evolutionary level.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 02:29 PM
1

This isn't RP. Not to gate keep, but that's 100% black pill. RP is understanding male/female nature and how it functions and is reinforced in society so you can be more aware and make better decisions in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 02:25 PM
1

Women no like dread but stay posting IG stories and relying on makeup to get over.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 02:23 PM
5

The flippant response back might be "if you want it done right, get a man to do it" lol. But seriously it sucks and the conversation around suicide is 100% female-centric in how its handled and the 'fixes' proposed.
/r/MensRights28/10/21 05:39 PM
1

The issue was not about her sexual desire, it was about your inability to check her and lay down rules. If you worked yourself to the bone and she was demanding things of you (not providing them) then it doesn't matter if she wanted you to be a human dildo, you weren't getting from her what you needed. A wife being a bitch and a nympho is no better or worse than a wife being a bitch and a prude. Either way you're losing and the only way to get out of a hole you dug yourself is to just stop diggi…
/r/MGTOW215/07/21 09:21 PM
2

Therapy doesn't work in this context because even if a therapist will validate his desire for sex, very few therapists will flat-out tell the other party that they are in many ways obligated to give sex to their partner.
/r/MGTOW215/07/21 09:09 PM
4

You're not asexual, then.
/r/MGTOW215/07/21 09:06 PM
6

I legit had a corticosteroid-induced manic episode (the ENT I was seeing wasn't aware of the other medications I was on) and I lost my mind for a time (though I didn't hurt anyone or anything in a physical way) and then did a header off a bridge but thankfully was such a fuck up that I landed on a walkway 5 feet below. Did a week in the rubber rooms zonked out on God knows what and detoxed pretty hard from the steroids. I have real empathy for anyone in that case. That said - 99% of the time a l…
/r/MGTOW207/07/21 04:38 AM
2

"I've come to view them as degrading" lol
/r/MGTOW206/07/21 04:56 AM
1

I remember listening to a conversation between Camille Paglia and Jordan B. Petersen where he's discussing the issue with men and women living in direct competition with one another in the modern world as a result of feminism, and he said something that stuck with me about women just not understanding that what keeps men in line, generally, is the understanding that if your mouth writes checks, your body is going to cash them at some point. With women, there just is no natural limit to the verba…
/r/MGTOW206/07/21 04:55 AM
1

Why do you care what they think?
/r/MGTOW215/06/21 08:40 PM
1

Right - that's how Rollo describes it as well, but a true Alpha would be the *most* feminine, as opposed to a man with T&A, which is basically what the whole 'Boss Bitch' persona is.
/r/MGTOW215/06/21 08:36 PM
3

It's a shame Billy Blue Balls has gone half-Woke, because there's epic tons of RP wisdom in his comedy.
/r/MGTOW209/06/21 06:14 PM
1

There isn't a prenup alive that's bulletproof. Same as the boilerplate liability waivers we sign when we join a gym or take our kids to a rock-climbing wall birthday party. Those things get heaved into the sun with great force in court.
/r/MGTOW218/05/21 07:21 PM
5

I had drinks with a long-time friend (she's a laaaadeeeee) catching up after her divorce finished and my divorce got rolling and it was funny trying to counsel her on why she had issues with the men she was dating now. She's definitely a Type A, go-getter, makes lots of money lady. She just kept complaining that all these men were giant pussies, nobody was on her level, they weren't men. I put my drink down and looked at her and said "OK, they're not men, but are you a lady?" She got bug-eyed an…
/r/MGTOW218/05/21 02:52 PM
5

Right, the legal standards in application for the 'best interest of the child' lean heavily on status quo determinations. The court is literally operating under the assumption that because it is this way (ie you were cucked) you were OK with it. Madness.
/r/MGTOW218/05/21 02:48 PM
3

Spousal support is much harder to obtain now, thankfully. Child support is complete and total BS, both in theory and in practice. Custody should be split as evenly as possible (and let any woman who complain thus be banned from ever complaining about her husband 'not doing more' with the kids while married) and there should be no factoring of incomes into the discussion. It's absurd that the kids (specifically the number of overnights with them) become the deciding factor in whether you can supp…
/r/MGTOW218/05/21 02:46 PM
2

If anything the natural instincts are more intense in less prosperous nations, because survival is much more tenuous. This is precisely why there's an entire industry of mail-order brides from Eastern Bloc, SE Asian, and Central/South American nations. The women will do what they gotta do to get that green (card) and then when they get here it's do just enough to not get sent back.
/r/MGTOW217/05/21 02:05 PM
5

Oh it pissed a LOT of (women) off. It was pretty fantastic to see the data come out and all the white lies about female attraction being exposed. The other study that was hilarious to see was the ones that confirm 'choreplay' leads to less sexual activity, not more.
/r/MGTOW217/05/21 02:03 PM
1

Yeah looks-maxxers kinda miss the forest for the trees. Sure, there is nothing wrong with trying to level-up, but if you think it'll be the difference-maker you're sadly mistaken. The other thing that is interesting about this is the impact this has on women. On some level I don't blame them, it's operant conditioning. They go online and get matched 50% of the time or more, they go to bars and get hit on two and three times a night and feel like that's not enough (because they get so many matche…
/r/MGTOW217/05/21 02:02 PM
3

Put it this way - all humans are lazy. Water seeks the path of least resistance. If you can get what you want through taking your clothes off, why would you bother forming a compelling argument? It's not that women don't regularly come up with fantastic contributions, of course they do. It's just that it's much easier to use your body to make a point if that's easier.
/r/MGTOW230/04/21 08:33 PM
1

This is some blue-pill 'woe is me' BS. I thought this sub was for men who knew how to nut up and go their own way. Wages have gone up, as has quality of life and cost of consumer items continues to decline when controlling for quality. This is the single best time in the history of ever to be alive from a QoL standpoint. Hypergamy is not a straight-jacket.
/r/MGTOW230/04/21 08:06 PM
-2

Many/most jobs pay a living wage. People just don't have the social skills to do what every other generation has done (ie get fucking roommates) and make a go of it. People aren't even trying anymore, just crying about their $15 an hour on their $900 cell phone and bitching about the lack of PS5 inventory.
/r/MGTOW230/04/21 07:39 PM
1

OK now do Ghengis Kahn.
/r/MGTOW230/04/21 07:35 PM
3

As Rollo says, a woman's sexuality is her only agency. This is why when women want to make a political point they do so by seeking attention and taking off their clothes in public. Obviously individuals can bring lots of value to the table, but looking at the standard distribution, it's just the way it is.
/r/MGTOW230/04/21 07:34 PM
6

Yeah it is still the go to because it works. Not only do women innately do this with their friends (social proof is much more important to women than men), the sneaky fuckers who are male feminists (ie men whose only play is to Trojan Horse their way into someone's pants) do it to hide their own toxic behaviors.
/r/MGTOW230/04/21 07:32 PM
1

Here's a note from a guy who is 38: spend your 20s making yourself into the man you want to be. Dating apps have crushed the market for 18-25 men and while you SHOULD be learning how to apply social strategies (aka 'game) to interact with women for professional and social reasons, you shouldn't extrapolate your experiences as a young man into your 30s because its a different world. I'm 38, in ok shape (but clearly lift regularly), and going through a divorce with kids but I will never lack for d…
/r/MGTOW230/04/21 07:30 PM
14

'Sex-positive' seems to be the popular nomenclature.
/r/MGTOW230/04/21 07:24 PM
1

Even worse - a lot of us guys who got married to an 'independent woman' who couldn't 'independently' clean up after herself dealt with this shit too. My apartment now is really clean, my things put away, and even my kids keep their room tidy because they know Dad is on his Ps and Qs with this shit. They don't complain and are 50x happier when they're with me in their space because it's organized and calm.
/r/MGTOW230/04/21 04:10 AM
1

What I've done so far is handle the initial complaint and service on my own, since there's nothing barring me from entering an attorney if it ends up in a trial phase. Obviously I'm not doing anything high level on my own, but I've navigated the early stages OK, and am out $250 or so to date. There's an excellent chance I'll need to bring a lawyer in down the road, but I figured there's no sense in getting billed to death for emails and phone calls.
/r/MGTOW230/04/21 04:01 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter