~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | What is "the patriarchy"?its just like "capitalism" someone who wants followers creating a boogeyman out of the results of evolution. just as "capitalism" was invented as an epithet to bemoan the imperfect world that results from property rights, "patriarchy" is an epithet to bemoan the imperfect world that results from being mammals. very useful for fostering resentment, which is useful if you want to manipulate people. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/23 05:35 AM |
| 3 | What is "the patriarchy"?the patriarchy is the sense, instilled since childhood, that the grass is greener for men. Its a global conspiracy perpetrated by half of the population against the other half. Its the knowledge that you deserved more, better, and that someone must be to blame for you not getting it. Patriarchy is everywhere, and everyone, lead by no-one, has no membership, isnt an organization and yet all organizations (except feminist ones) serve it. The greatest achievement of patriarchy was when it convinced… | /r/MensRights | 04/10/23 05:17 AM |
| 1 | What do men do when faced with a challenge, a situation with no one to help them?Old old OOOOOOLD wisdom says this:. It is possible to thrive in self-reliance. Find a code, choose a purpose, achieve discipline. Life will hurt, society is not fair. The code will help you when you are too weary and hurt to see clearly. The purpose will help you when you are out of hope, it will give you a direction to trudge. Discipline is the thing that makes the other parts function.. As for a code, highly recommended tenets include; Efficacy is a virtue, do not half-ass shit. Happines… | /r/MensRights | 04/10/23 04:46 AM |
| 2 | I used to be a feminist, until...I propose that "Supporting human rights for all humans, and citizen rights for all citizens, without double standards or restrictions based on immutable characteristics." and a named ideology that purports this ideal in favor of only one group at the expense of another might not be one and the same thing. | /r/MensRights | 15/02/23 11:03 PM |
| 2 | I used to be a feminist, until...So you do not support what it is today or what it is achieving today, and therefore do not support much of what it achieved in the past that created what you experience of it today, but you support the idea of the good things that it promises being fought for in other places where they are theoretically needed... and thats why you continue to identify with a harmful ideology that has directly harmed you to a degree that makes you seem traumatized by the event. Am I following this correctly? | /r/MensRights | 15/02/23 10:51 PM |
| 2 | Another fine articleOr maybe women having the option to *not* sacrifice their lifespan and social life lead to a lower historical incidence of women driving themselves to excel in various fields of endeavor where men found it worthwhile to do so. Ambitious huxters and hustlers obscuring and taking credit for their teams or outright stealing the discoveries of others is like crime, never the norm but ever present. Males are far from protected from this, so of course it has happened to women as well. | /r/MensRights | 15/02/23 10:27 PM |
| 7 | Men who kill a woman don't kill her because she's a woman. They're just generally criminals.TL;DR ...In a society that normalizes female violence to a point where it is reflexively defended, directly naming the beast can be counter productive. ... . It takes active belligerent denial to imagine that those who are punished for it are committing an act more often than those who are celebrated for it. Even when presented with evidence a moving goal post is to be expected when confronting a reflexive and defensive attempt to justify a foundational belief in a dogmatic follower of any belie… | /r/MensRights | 15/02/23 10:00 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter