TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Fair-Might-5473 Archive

View 0 posts and 188 comments by Fair-Might-5473 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

This feels a lot like Tradcon. Regardless, she described it as a passive role, but clearly doesn't understand that the reality for the majority of people is that it is hard work, because of financial differences. Most people don't have the luxury for this. She forgets that Feminism brought them in the workforce. They don't have the luxury to have a passive role. More concerning, most people don't even get to the point of relationships, because there is quite literally nothing attractive about wo…
/r/MensRights05/07/25 04:22 PM
1

Let me repeat a part of my previous comment. Like I said, while Conservatives don't necessarily have a good framework for men, they certainly at the very least have a framework for men. It's one more than democrats can provide. Conservatives don't support anyone, so in that way, you could be right, but, because democrats support women and minorities, that makes them still one point behind conservatives. Why? Because it shows them who they won't support. They have shown this over the years, espec…
/r/MensRights04/07/25 12:57 AM
1

All politicians lie. Politics is all about saving your own ass now. Bernie Sanders could have made a change many decades ago, but even he wouldn't be able to do much, because what could he possibly do? Under Capitalism, socialistic ideas will be trampled when society is filled with single people. Single people don't care happens to others, unless it's about their own people. If you look at both sides, they both have totally opposing ideologies. Culturally, there is a massive divide that doesn't …
/r/MensRights03/07/25 11:26 PM
0

They're also the first ones to walk away from their country, because their country isn't "ready for change". No, no, it cannot be because the ideology is incredibly flawed.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 10:39 PM
1

People are ducking lower class and average for life. More importantly, even Harris, Walz, the Clintons or whoever from the other side have clearly shown that they have no interest in helping men, but to use them to support themselves. Governmental institutions do not help us.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 10:06 PM
5

Nobody said that Republicans cared for us. Calling it Class warfare doesn't fix anything. There are dozens of jobs still not being done, because they don't pay as good as other jobs. Regardless of how you view this, class stratification is something that cannot be done. Nobody wants to be the part of the lower class. Good luck!
/r/MensRights03/07/25 10:00 PM
19

It's because of the believe that these tech bros got their position for being a man. Men get their positions for free. Women have to somehow fight tooth and nail for their position. It's lazy, reductive and has no proof of being true. The closest proof they have is that the fields are dominated by men. Domination by men is always been seen negative, until it's about blue collar jobs. Ever since Feminism removed women's dating prospects by putting them in the workforce, we've been put in some ult…
/r/MensRights01/07/25 12:30 AM
8

Have they figured out that there are female Andrew Tates like Thewizardliz who influence these women? How about some TikTok misandry? How about all the people calling men Incels? The incompetence of the UN is astonishing. Feminism is fighting the system, but the Manosphere has somehow dangerous, because of criticism towards Feminism. Manosphere is somehow radicalizing men to be for authoritarianism. Ironic for such an organization
/r/MensRights30/06/25 09:16 PM
1

How were men even masculine before? We haven't done any of those roles, because there was never a reason to do so. You cannot complain about something that wasn't happening. It's similar to how women will argue that they sacrifice their body by childbirth. Have you been reading the news? Birth rate at all time low. People walked away from all responsibilities, because why should you?
/r/MensRights30/06/25 10:47 AM
10

Let's hypothetically say it is. Now what? What's the point of labelling all these things in such a way? You're not making much of a case, besides saying, look men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/06/25 07:19 PM
1

To be part of a oversaturated Ultra Capitalistic system. Low wage jobs. It's one of the bigger flaws of such ideologies. Somehow, the expectation from these fanatics is that people should be altruistic and just take these jobs for the team, because it's an honor to be the bourgeoisie and be a cog in the societal machine and support women. Being good seems to be an absolute one way deal. Ironically, we're expected to do things we don't want to do, while we cannot have expectations and sacrifices …
/r/MensRights29/06/25 05:22 PM
2

Arguing like ultra Socialists, but acting like ultra Capitalists. Arguing like Feminists, but acting like ultra Sexists. Never believe a word that comes out of their mouth.
/r/MensRights29/06/25 12:39 AM
1

It was a power, but it's slowly decaying, because for one, just like the usage of labels, it was overused. In addition to that, complaining during where everyone is suffering, it's very hard for people to take it seriously who have no intention to solve issues.
/r/MensRights27/06/25 11:45 PM
1

Society by design requires sacrifice that Postgenderism cannot deliver. If Ukraine went Postgenderism, it wouldn´t exist. This makes a lot of assumptions that simply cannot be made, because of human selfishness.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/06/25 03:06 PM
3

They can do whatever they want. Just leave us and our money alone.
/r/MensRights17/06/25 02:10 AM
5

When are we ready for the "responsibility and duties" talk? Any form of rights conversation is really boring now.
/r/MensRights16/06/25 07:02 PM
3

I don't think it matters much whether it is 50%, 70% or 90%. It's an economic death trap. If anyone has been in women's subreddits, a common complaint is how they also cannot find the job that gives the lifestyle they want. It was never feasible to give the highest income jobs to all women. That was one of the many scams that they pull on women. What difference does it make, when nobody really gets the jobs. Society needs cogs in the system, but cannot get them, because neither side wants those …
/r/MensRights16/06/25 02:59 PM
1

I find the concept quite problematic from an economic perspective. How is it that the people who condemn this structure are so hard trying to get to the top layers of the hierarchy by getting corporate jobs? All of this, still, after this many years. You would think that people would think of scrutinizing this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/06/25 08:43 PM
8

That has to do with the fact that men went through years of self-improvement. I warned about this years ago. There is a massive disparity in terms of self-improvement. You're just working your ass off in your younger years. There is also no guarantee in your older years that you will find someone like those women in their younger years. That's also where that whole Incel trope comes from.Then there is also that women have their own income, so, it still won't make a difference. As much as this su…
/r/MensRights13/06/25 12:46 PM
1

It's irrelevant what women find important, because over the last decade, we have been going to self-improvement and nothing changed. As long as there isn't some for everyone to their satisfaction, that work will be in vain. Most of the self-improvement conversations are only about men, because of the underlying assumption that men put no effort. The issue is that there is no way to find a suitable partner for men who do put effort, because women aren't satisfactory to men in order to engage in a…
/r/MensRights11/06/25 10:32 PM
1

I don't know why anyone still follows any rule in society. Women don't hold themselves to anything. Why are you?
/r/MensRights09/06/25 01:14 AM
4

Our groups have a negative connotation due to the association towards red pill stuff. Feminists tend to go for extreme examples, such as murder and rape. Despite that we have the same issue, it doesn't have proper examples of it, except the court proofs. People tend to take it more seriously when there is a shock value to it.
/r/MensRights07/06/25 02:49 PM
2

Reform to what? What kind of culture are we looking for? What does it mean to become better? What does a relationship look like in such a society?
/r/MensRights05/06/25 11:54 AM
1

It depends on how you're perceived. People tend to have far more expectations from physically unattractive people than attractive people.
/r/MensRights05/06/25 11:38 AM
1

They don't see it necessarily as belonging to the country. They see it as helping another human being. It's entitlement to your help, because ultimately, people believe that they deserve to be alive.
/r/MensRights04/06/25 12:28 PM
1

Honestly, who cares? Nobody uses those apps anymore.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 05:40 PM
1

A partnership would only make sense if you assume ideal circumstances. It makes one big false assumption; Attraction. The moment that isn't there, you're not left with much of a bargaining chip. It doesn't matter whether this is a traditional relationship or partnership. If people already don't look forward to share a space with you, anything will be seen as a sacrifice that needs to be rewarded. Very much transactional.
/r/MensRights01/06/25 03:42 PM
1

I absolute do not like Andrew Tate, but one thing that he is right about, that all other movements deny is, the existence of competition. A lot of parts of our society is zero-sum. There isn't an infinite number of 6 figure jobs. Not everyone gets paid the same. Not everyone get to be a doctor. There aren't infinite number of attractive women. You catch the drift. Recognition of our problem won't do much when there is zero effort to solve it. Quite frankly, I wouldn't want to be appointed as the…
/r/MensRights01/06/25 12:59 AM
1

There are no jobs that we want to take that pays us enough. What do you expect? The plantation isn't our place.
/r/MensRights31/05/25 11:03 PM
8

What in the hell could they possibly offer men? Not even the Republicans like us, but at the very least, they promote ideas that could at the very least offer something that men want under certain conditions. For most part, our issues are cultural and there is absolutely nothing that people can offer men for their loyalty. Nothing. Leverage means that you have something that people want. There is nothing that most of their voting base offer men. It's a lost cause.
/r/MensRights31/05/25 04:46 AM
20

Regardless of whatever conversation people have about dating, it seems like they're always deflecting any scrutiny towards them back at us. Articles about birth rates are similar in that. People constantly argue as if men never do introspects, but Personally, I yet have to see proper introspects from these people. Trump was blamed. Andrew Tate was blamed. Economy was blamed. Everything is blamed, except them. The entire assumption by them is that they're viable partners or even wanted in the fir…
/r/MensRights30/05/25 08:22 PM
2

I always thought that this was what black pill was about. Determinism. Your life being pre-defined by how you are born that determines your future, thus there is no reason to really do anything.
/r/MensRights25/05/25 09:35 PM
5

Your assumption is that the ideology was practicable in the first place. It's similar to the idea of telling everyone that they deserve to be rich. It rests on good faith, but it cannot deliver. Everything comes at a cost and Feminists have a tendency to pass the bill to everyone else, but to themselves.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/25 04:51 PM
3

Want? At what point did Feminism ever talk about men's opinion and their choice? There has never been a choice, because it's either A. blamed to the boogeyman that there isn't one, or B. It's put under the partnership category that you do exactly what she does, which in reality, she also doesn't conform to. You're biggest fall pit here is to listen to an ideology that was broken from the start. There is no universal contract that every man and woman holds onto. People just hold onto whatever ben…
/r/MensRights25/05/25 04:19 PM
2

I will never believe a guardian article in my life. Positive or negative. They have no credibility.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/25 11:24 PM
12

Regardless of whatever argument you hear, whether it is economically viability, height or any other characteristic, It's not about those things. Even if men all had the best possible traits, people still find some excuse to reject you. As initially stated, it is actually about physically viable of women and more. People forget that the female gender role at the very least something that men were somewhat interested in, because there are some benefits attached to us. Both of these things are heav…
/r/MensRights23/05/25 04:43 PM
4

Are you new here? These tabloids have never ever been subject to credibility, which is why it's not worth opening them and reading them in the first place. It's just rage bait.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 01:39 PM
4

Putin and Xi Jinping would like a word with you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/25 12:59 PM
6

That's the biggest cause of our world pollution? God, I have lost my hope in science.
/r/MensRights21/05/25 08:45 PM
47

What exactly is the point of such article except rage bait? There is no practical usefulness for such data and yet they decided to give it funding. What a waste of money. I'll add it to the list.
/r/MensRights21/05/25 08:01 PM
1

With regards to number 4, It's not one way, but it goes both ways. As much as people argue that women aren't happy with men, who said that men were happy with women? People argue as if dating certain women is dating down. Dating down assumes that these people have at least some potential, but doesn't tick necessarily all boxes. Who said that women ticked any boxes at all? I question whether there are even boxes left to tick, because of how Feminism removed it all, through financial independence …
/r/MensRights21/05/25 04:19 PM
2

The issue isn´t just marriage, They´re not dating in general. If marriage was the main problem, at least, they would try to hold onto the relationship as much as possible. They don´t. There is more to it.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 12:16 PM
4

The problem is that you're accepting their definitions. Don't. They will make up a million other terms to for every instance to call it some form of way injustice or justice, whatever makes sense according to their selective moral compass.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 10:59 PM
2

I read quickly about it, but it didn't hold on very long or was superseded with other taxes. I don't think it will do well with women in 2025, because singlehood is quite a mutual decision/agreement in society. I don't think that women want to be taxed for being single and being pushed to be with someone they don't want. Making it a gender-specific thing is forever impossible due to the constitution.
/r/MensRights17/05/25 11:59 PM
10

Take this with a grain of salt, but I have always understood that it existed because polyamory doesn't work well in a society. You would have a small group of men having the majority of women, while the rest of the population would just resist against it. Pretty much like how people resist society now. I don't believe that it is insisted upon by middle-aged women, but it is for middle-aged women. Obviously, women have big careers now, so they can take care of themselves now. One of the big hurdl…
/r/MensRights17/05/25 11:42 PM
1

The idea of collective doesn't when one gets rewarded more than the other, despite having done the same effort. For example, 1000 people have a diploma in medicine, but there are only 100 spots for the job. What happens to the rest of the 900 people? They're not going to take the jobs that, despite being essential, not paying enough. More importantly here is that they pay far less and are far less respected.
/r/MensRights17/05/25 09:33 PM
1

This isn’t about complaining—it’s about fixing it. Democratic socialism COULD work if it actually backed men and immigrant rights instead of pretending these problems don’t exist. Male rights activism, benevolent matriarchy, sex-positivity, all of it—it needs to come together so men don’t keep getting shoved to the side. It cannot work, because of romantic and economic/financial disparity. Generally, a relationship with two incomes is more beneficial than a single income, assuming that both agre…
/r/MensRights17/05/25 07:01 PM
2

Do these people realize that they have been doing this for decades now and they yet have to take accountability to the fact that they still seem to not be succeeding? Oh wait, they'll just blame some boogieman like Patriarchy, Andrew Tate, Red pill. Anything, but themselves.
/r/MensRights17/05/25 12:11 AM
1

Well, that's what you would call in Feminist terms; objectifying.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 11:11 AM
8

Is it a surprise? People constantly argue that it's important for us to work together as a collective, while simultaneously do whatever they can to climb up the socio-economic ladder. You're not keeping much of a collective culture, when you tell everyone to sacrifice while also looking down on them. There is also the dating status that is being affected. There is a reason that still after this many years, it's still a popular topic. You can't talk shit to the hand that feeds you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/05/25 09:08 PM
2

You're not making sense. You're essentially saying women need to behave like NPCs who exist to fulfil men's wishes and desires. That's not reality. What us women want is very relevant to us 🙄 what you mean is, YOU dont care because you see women as a tool/resource who exist to please and pleasure you who has no will, desire, expectations of her own. You say men's wishes as though all men are the exact same 🤣 Nobody can fit all men's/all women's wishes (unless they have severe DID 🤭). If that's t…
/r/MensRights12/05/25 02:29 PM
8

Except, it didn't.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/05/25 12:10 AM
3

Men can do whatever women want, but there are obvious conditioned linked to this. What women want becomes quickly quite irrelevant when it misses men's wishes in the first place. The fundamental problem in dating has never been men. It's the inability for women to match up to men's wishes. That's what Feminism has been attacking and taking away from women. Their independence lead to also their dating prospects being taken away.
/r/MensRights11/05/25 09:51 PM
10

After 20 years, i doubt there is evidence that they really stand for anything, but falsely uplifting their own social and moral status. They're like social media influencers. They will claim to stand up for anything, but always looking for others to clean up their mess. There is never actual work involved to make their wishes come true.
/r/MensRights11/05/25 04:33 AM
2

What if feminist progress undermines male progress? There are a lot of aspects in society that is zero game. Money. Jobs. Quantity of attractive partners. I can go on. A lot of the issues about gender construct is that it is entirely defined by one group, leaving other groups no space to talk about their opinions. Their perspectives and desires. A lot of it is reduced to whatever they benefit from the other gender, simultaneously leaving them playroom for whatever they desire. Freeing men from t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/25 03:33 PM
5

If you're Turkish. then I think that women's right is your last problem in Turkey at this point. It's a luxury considering the current situation.
/r/MensRights09/05/25 03:02 PM
1

There are so many issues. Confidence can get you success, but so can playing the lottery. Yes, it's possible to win, but how high is that chance? I'm not a gambler, but that does sound like a terrible bet to make. A lot of people don't get to be a winner. More importantly is what pool people are fishing in. Everyone is just fishing in the same pool with the same fishing techniques they all learnt from the internet, but there aren't that many fish in the pool, let alone, will fall for the same ba…
/r/MensRights08/05/25 01:36 AM
3

As someone who is in Academia. I lost total hope in science in general, ever since I started reading all the psychology papers. I cannot take it seriously anymore.
/r/MensRights05/05/25 04:37 PM
2

Then why are you in this system in the first place? Everyone is here for the benefits, but the moment we start talking about responsibilities, they're all out. They can stop talking forever. No need for any conversation. We're done.
/r/MensRights05/05/25 03:05 PM
12

That's why the condom was invented.
/r/MensRights05/05/25 01:58 AM
15

I didn't know we were magically making 40+ old women pregnant? The more you know. Or are you insinuating that men are raping 40+ old women?
/r/MensRights05/05/25 12:21 AM
28

Who in the right mind has children with 40+ old women?
/r/MensRights05/05/25 12:02 AM
4

Ok.
/r/MensRights03/05/25 02:42 AM
2

You're arguing here as if there is any form of logic going on in these people. That's your first mistake. Your second mistake is that they're in any form or way interested in your believes. They're not. You cannot talk to someone who doesn't even listen. The biggest mistake is assuming that they are empathetic. They're not. Feminists strictly argue under their own moral compass. Everyone is the good guy when you make your own rules that define what makes you a good guy.
/r/MensRights02/05/25 10:21 PM
15

What is there to think about? They want to reach this market, but they don't have a product. They thought they had something, but as always, they don't to their market and drown once again. They lost, because they don't have an ideology that sells. They lost, because they think that they know what people want. Not because they know. That requires them to listen actively. They don't care about us. They care about winning an election. It doesn't matter if democrats lose or win elections, because a…
/r/MensRights01/05/25 04:48 PM
3

I don't care how much support we can get from the Guardian, but I refuse to view and read a "the Guardian" Article. They have done nothing but publish shit articles. Boycott the Guardian!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/25 10:15 PM
1

Not being fat.
/r/MensRights30/04/25 05:56 PM
8

It is indeed a reach. Far reach. People hate Trump, but people hate democrats even more.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/25 04:32 PM
39

Consider that after decades of Feminist propaganda, they're still blaming a bald man with a Lambo for all their failures who existed for at most a couple years. In order to have any form of expectation, They require to be good at something first. That's how deep the situation has sunken.
/r/MensRights27/04/25 10:55 PM
2

Equality? You mean that one word that everyone Feminist uses according to their own definition? You know, not like how most words exist purely because of mutual agreement on the definition. You know, because words can be easily misused in your favor, because of moral relativism.
/r/MensRights27/04/25 03:49 PM
3

Stop. reading. The Guardian. Stop giving them clicks and views. Regardless of how much it pisses you off and how ridiculous the articles might be.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 10:41 AM
2

I don't vote for war. My body, my choice. Good luck!
/r/MensRights25/04/25 10:26 AM
13

That´s a way to lose total sense of nationalism and lose your entire army.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 01:15 AM
2

You're tripping if you're still paying the bill in 2025.
/r/MensRights24/04/25 04:26 PM
1

That doesn't sound like success.
/r/MensRights23/04/25 06:44 PM
2

That's the fun part. That's for them to find out.
/r/MensRights23/04/25 10:16 AM
6

I see some disagreements here, but I kind of like this idea. People really don't understand the pitfall of modern dating. It would nicely point out why modern dating isn't working for men. Obviously, this idea is more about teaching men on how to be better, but I think that this idea would quickly work against them and show how inadequate a lot of women actually are in dating.
/r/MensRights22/04/25 10:34 PM
18

That sounds about right. Society always had words for that. "Left over". Also for people who can't keep their legs shut. "Whore". Plenty of words that can be used.
/r/MensRights22/04/25 09:55 PM
19

There is also no women's duties in society, so we don't go anywhere, until they take responsibility in society in certain aspects, like blue collar work.
/r/MensRights22/04/25 09:51 PM
18

I know guys like that as well. Even if they did have options, more options still doesn't mean good options either. The entire claim under Feminists is that there is plenty of attractive women for men. I don't see any reason that in 2025, there can be this many men single for not doing "enough" to attract these attractive women. How is it that in no conversation people talked about the number of unattractive women who failed to attract a man? In what world are we living in that so many women can …
/r/MensRights22/04/25 09:37 PM
61

There are a lot of loose ends here. Nobody can give a good reason on why to take blue collar jobs, except out of some societal duty. For years, they promoted high salary jobs. Now what? Don't also forget how fucked dating is, which influences our career decision. No single person wants to take some low-wage job and having to partner up with someone they don't want. A single person already barely can afford their own place. Add the fact that birth rates are low. This was the entire downside of Fe…
/r/MensRights22/04/25 07:19 PM
36

The guy has been off the radar for so long. He has become like the Patriarchy boogeyman. Non-existent. It's all about promoting more Feminism and trying to teach young boys to become Feminists. As always, they don't manage to do it, so it must be the boogey man. This has been happening since forever. It's lack of accountability and inability to accept that the ideology doesn't work.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/25 11:31 AM
3

Feminism is just a synonym for bottom who cannot accept that they're bottom. No, they worked hard enough to be at least middle. After so many years, I've yet to see a substantial group of women who claimed to be losers, thus needed to step up to impress other bottom men. These conversations are really boring. Just let these terms rest. They don't add anything to the conversation, except the feeling that their term is validated.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/25 09:45 PM
74

May I suggest not reading any The Guardian articles? I refuse to support any shit news media by giving them clicks and views. Thank you.
/r/MensRights21/04/25 01:12 AM
19

Who said that you were fuckable in the first place. This is a key aspect of a lot of Feminism. This is similar to the idea of someone making their own currency, equating it to the dollar and then going to the store and paying with your own currency. Unless the store or anyone validates your currency, it has no value. Feminists are notorious for claiming to be incredibly valuable without any form of validation. Instead, just claim that others are lesser than them, thus always are above any man. T…
/r/MensRights20/04/25 05:22 PM
2

There has never been conversations with men for anything since forever. No conversation about culture. No conversation about dating frameworks (traditional vs modern). Women define equality strictly from their own perspective and then judge everyone with terminology based on their own definition. It's not hard to escape any lawsuit when you're the judge in all of them. It's dismissing any other view, but theirs. They have too much institutional power, especially in media, to control the narrativ…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/25 02:54 PM
1

What are you on about? This concerns men. Class struggle is directly the consequence of culture struggles.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/25 02:29 PM
1

And then what? You're not going to fix the culture by defeating them. It's just that people have relatively more money in their pocket. That's it. You're still going to have class issues, because we don't know how to stratify the classes. It's just going to be a new face for the higher class.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/25 11:39 PM
13

The more views they get, the more they will promote these things. I avoid the news like the plague. What purpose would news media when they lose their entire audience and cannot gain any views and clicks? Like Feminists, let them talk and embarrass them. As long as they make no money from the general audience, it will amount to nothing. That's how you make them become defunded. Boycott their entire existence.
/r/MensRights18/04/25 11:10 PM
11

Feminism won't survive. People forget that we're also dealing with demographic changes in society. The more we become a minority, the more other groups will become a majority. If other groups have a very anti-feministic rhetoric, you can safely consider that women's rights will quickly cease to exist. Feminism has an incredibly hard job to even keep itself alive after all the damage that was done. I doubt that they will make it. Whatever the future will be, it certainly will not be female.
/r/MensRights18/04/25 02:10 PM
5

I'm more surprised that the Patriarchy is doing its best to put more and more women in educational fields like STEM. How dare the Patriarchy doing this to women! How dare the Patriarchy giving women rights! One key aspect of Feminism is choice. If we hypothetically argue that this concept would exist and hurt men, I'm still looking for the choices that they're planning to give men. If you look at any political party in any country, the one thing they have in common is that they're all trying to …
/r/MensRights18/04/25 01:48 PM
7

Maybe if men stopped basing their identity on money and domination, they wouldn’t feel so attacked by basic equality. Have you even looked into women's subreddits, you wank stain? They quite literally base their entire identity on their money and domination now.
/r/MensRights18/04/25 12:43 AM
52

It's a lazy to generalize certain bad behaviors in men, but much like Feminism and their terms, they always shift their goal post. It's similar to the words "Insecure" and "Confident. If they like you or what you do, you're "confident". If they don't like you or what you don't do, you're "insecure". In the end, I wouldn't even consider these terms valuable to any conversation as they really don't give any indication to where you want, ever. People can deny it all they want, but in 2025, it's sti…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/25 11:08 PM
7

As much as there are great women out here, they really tend to take a lot of pride for jobs they haven't even done.
/r/MensRights17/04/25 10:33 PM
29

They're comparing themselves as if they're Afghani women. They don't know what they're talking about.
/r/MensRights17/04/25 06:40 PM
1

I don't think you understand how culture works. Feminism didn't do much. All it did is make women rebellious. It's not hard being rebellious by dropping all your responsibilities and stop just doing whatever you were expected to do. The problems that we're having now is exactly because of this behavior. You just get a bunch of people living their life without thinking twice how this influences other people's behavior. They're like anarchists. They hate all the rules and laws, until the chaos aff…
/r/MensRights17/04/25 03:19 PM
3

Have these broads ever actually managed to fix their issues? We had Feminism for decades. Don't they get bored of hearing the same thing over and over at this point? Create your own system then and leave?
/r/MensRights17/04/25 02:24 AM
11

The problem with these conversations is that Feminists tend to make arguments based on false assumptions. It's incredibly hard to convince someone who already believes in something that hasn't been proven properly, like the concept of Patriarchy. It's like a religious person telling you to prove that god doesn't exist, and when you don't, calling Checkmate. The assumption is already that god exist, and thus leaving the proof to you. Feminists love Bell Hooks for her book, but her book has the sa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/25 02:36 PM
7

Remember when women talked about how they wear make-up and dress for themselves and other women? That should give you a clue. You can't blame a boogey man when you specifically said that you didn't care about their opinion. So, which is it? Do you care or do you not? You can't take a lot of women seriously anymore with this amount of ego saving.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 02:20 PM
-1

There is nobody on this damn planet who hates Feminists more than I do. Remember that the majority of white women voted Trump. As much I understand your grudge towards a lot of them. You have to understand that there exist women on our side. It's all about filtering out those who do not belong with the male population from those who do. For a lot the issues you suffer from, it's not about the people, but the place where you find them. Be vocal about who you are and what you stand for. The 2024 E…
/r/MensRights15/04/25 11:08 PM
9

Ultimately it's about giving people the freedom to explore the full spectrum of their humanity, rather than forcing anyone into a predetermined role. In this economy? When people cannot even find jobs after getting their degree? The more this economy tightens the noose for people's future careers, the more we're entering a world into a predetermined role. There is a choice, indeed. Low wage A or low wage B. Respectfully, unattractive women aren't necessarily all getting the "stay at home wife" r…
/r/MensRights13/04/25 07:39 PM
4

What is there left to support? A dying movement that made false promises to women that they could have it all? A movement that wants women to succeed in the economic system, but then looks down on everyone who doesn't earn as much, because they didn't work harder than you? Simultaneously complaining that you didn't get the position you want merely for your gender, rather than your performance? A movement that promotes greed, while acting like a superior moral collectivist? Might as well call you…
/r/MensRights13/04/25 06:47 PM
17

Have you tried actually being a politician who supports these men? Just a mere suggest.
/r/MensRights13/04/25 05:47 PM
1

The hard truth is, in this new landscape, being an average guy just doesn’t cut it anymore. And while that’s not anyones fault individually, it’s incredibly demoralizing to see older generations, often no more impressive than anyone else, having stable relationships simply because they lived in a different time with different expectations. I don't want to undermine our own suffering, but that's half the story. They didn't help women either. Feminism neglects talking about the downsides of the mo…
/r/MensRights13/04/25 04:05 PM
2

More like one big main income and SAHM.
/r/MensRights13/04/25 03:04 PM
1

There are two issues that cause for this segregation: Male-female competition in dating Capitalism. Unless you somehow manage to find a better concept than Capitalism with a culture that gives every man and woman a satisfactory partner, you are going to stuck forever there. Both groups sell minimum wage labor for very little reward. Whether this is in dating, economy or any other form. This is why both Feminism and Mensright don't work very well for others. It's much easier to sell rights than d…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/25 01:15 PM
3

I think people heavily underestimate how bad our current economic system is. This idea of "traditional" relationships barely exist anymore, unless you earn a significant amount of money. For most women, this is not really an option either. That's also the entire illusion of choice Feminism. Unless you're a certain level of attractive and are willing to date a ugly ass guy and have to accept a live a incredibly minimalistic life. It's possible, just unlikely. Statistically, it's not significant e…
/r/MensRights13/04/25 12:48 PM
1

I don't know about you, but the most developed countries have definitely not been doing well in the last twenty years. Equality has definitely not been that long that you can particularly see any progress. Perhaps the US doesn't have this problem, but in a lot of European countries, the elderly care is pretty bad. The difference in wealthy in the US is quite bad, but with respect to Europe, it's nothing comparable. I'm not denying your statements, but I do not believe that these takes will neces…
/r/MensRights12/04/25 11:15 PM
1

That's because whatever money we already had in our system is being spent without having proper flow of money into the system. It's not hard to spend money to help people when you don't worry about your income. Everything comes at a cost. Gender equality comes at the cost of our social security. Nobody is particularly interested in keeping up a system for the sake of your benefit, unless they have some form of benefit to it. I'm referring to the nurses and nursing assistants. This is just one ex…
/r/MensRights12/04/25 03:44 PM
1

Yeah I recognize the gender roles had a reason for existing, just like slavery did. It’s still a social ill that should ultimately be evolved away from I understand that, but if there is no alternative concept to it, all you will be doing is breaking things down without building things up. I’m not sure I understand your point about caregiving? Is that in reference to what I said about men being secondary parents and women being primary parents? Because most men would like to spend more time with…
/r/MensRights12/04/25 02:00 PM
1

That's pretty much how society have always worked. How else are you going to get certain jobs done? Out of altruism? Currently, you want caregivers in society, but 1. they cannot pay give it a pay that makes it attractive enough. 2. People don't want to become it out of self-interest. How can you make such a job attractive in society such that you get enough of these people to do it? Compensation is the only possible way.
/r/MensRights12/04/25 01:05 PM
1

I overread "given the social economic". My apologies
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/04/25 10:26 AM
3

For as long as I have been going out, I highly recommend you guys who go out to say to one another: I like you (as a person). It always gives me a great feeling hearing and saying it. Talk to one another. If one day, we end up on the frontlines, I much rather be with you guys.
/r/MensRights11/04/25 11:26 PM
4

Who said that men were fighting? My body, my choice! As much as they get to complain and resist, so do we. Until they appease us in society, there is no way that I'll be going to the frontlines.
/r/MensRights11/04/25 11:24 PM
1

Sounds more like a woman problem than a Tradcon problem, to be honest.
/r/MensRights11/04/25 11:19 PM
4

Depends on what you want and view it, I suppose. Aren't norms and values all about mutualism? After all, we're social animals who profit from one another in some ways, especially in a society. It's in our best interest to follow rules, so it makes profit for all much better, Obviously under the condition that the other side does as well.
/r/MensRights11/04/25 11:18 PM
1

Do you honestly believe that everyone has a choice? Two people who are lower in terms of socioeconomic class absolutely do not have the choice to be more "traditional". That's the entire illusion of this framework.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/25 04:30 PM
1

Nope, sticking to right. We're going down together. Until the left appeases to men, we're not going anywhere.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/25 12:22 PM
5

During those years between 2012 and 2014, they were heavily protesting for women's right in Ukraine. Suddenly, these protests are nowhere to be found. They have a responsibility to hold each other accountable for what happens in Ukraine. Considering that this group is still massive, and still are partying elsewhere, while profiting off us, the label is very appropriate for this. They don't understand any other forms of communication, so if they were ready to use this tactic, so are we. This is t…
/r/MensRights10/04/25 09:36 PM
18

The traitorous gender. I'm looking at you, Ukrainian women.
/r/MensRights10/04/25 08:33 PM
5

It really all boils down to greed and always assuming to be in power in dating. Look at every woman's subreddit and you'll notice the pattern. "I earn x amount, attractive, etc". It has become a cesspool of self-labeling. They're all, if we're going to use terms that people understand, high value, so they all deserve a quality man of their choice. It's like a town full of citizens who all claim to be king and queen. You're not going to find a regular citizen. This issue also, for a big part, cre…
/r/MensRights10/04/25 12:40 PM
9

A lot of higher end jobs are saturated. Then they started come with DEI to have an "equal" number of men and women in these jobs. The problem is that equality was never applied to lower end jobs. When people start talking about lower end jobs for women, the argument is always given as "Men don't want to do those jobs too". They can't convince women to take shitty jobs. How are they going to convince men? I haven't even talked about the impact of this on dating. Consequently, the down spiral of t…
/r/MensRights10/04/25 02:26 AM
5

They couldn't even convince women to take lower wage jobs. How in the hell are they going to convince men to take these jobs? Might as well call yourself legally fuckin' stupid with this level of obliviousness.
/r/MensRights10/04/25 01:51 AM
1

Democrats are notoriously known for their lip service. I will always say this. Until they actually provide a solution, it will be just that. Lip service. As someone mentioned, they don't want to help us. They want our votes. They cannot continue milking away society like republicans. None of the parties can really provide a solution as the societal issues are primarily cultural. Nobody can convince people, especially men, to take lower wage supportive jobs out of a form of societal responsibilit…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/25 05:00 PM
1

It depends on how you view it. We are stronger than women. It's quite intrinsic. A lot of our abilities are quite intrinsic when you think about that we had two decades of this charade and they only have managed to trickle down, despite both having arms and legs. A lot of worth comes down to how much people are willing to pay for.
/r/MensRights07/04/25 04:34 PM
7

Not the Ukrainians. They're sleeping.
/r/MensRights06/04/25 11:37 PM
5

Exactly my point.
/r/MensRights06/04/25 11:33 PM
11

True. They are already dead in their hypothetical war.
/r/MensRights06/04/25 11:31 PM
7

Tell the Ukrainians that.
/r/MensRights06/04/25 11:29 PM
12

They better be military service ready then. Putin doesn't care who he sends to the frontlines. He will send his men and attack you. Men or women.
/r/MensRights06/04/25 09:05 PM
10

I find the argument about fear quite ironic. Why propose inclusivity then? You assume that the lion is going to kill you, yet you want to be in the cage? Why protest for women's right when andrew tates are around the corner ready to beat the crap out of you? Anecdotal, but the more I distance myself from them, the more they want to come closer. I do not believe that women fear men. It's just one of those straw man arguments to play victim and gain an advantage. It's all about avoiding accountabi…
/r/MensRights06/04/25 12:15 PM
14

Consequence of low supply that is derived from Feminism. The entire movement has always been vocal about doing less. Body positivity, no more gender roles, etc. It´s all about doing whatever you want to do, while holding others to a standard. There are too many men who do too much, so the bar will endlessly go up as long as men work hard.
/r/MensRights06/04/25 12:36 AM
3

A lot of male groups tend to made ruined the moment certain women are involved. Gamer inner circles that are exclusively for men tend to last quite long and well, until a progressive woman gets involved in the group. Suddenly, certain things aren´t okay to be said. Everyone knows that gamer groups are incredibly toxic when you measure it with the `progressive metrics. When you actually measure it in terms of our own metrics, they´re pretty decent. Progressivism just doesn´t work for men imo.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/25 10:56 PM
3

It matters when you factor out all other means of attraction. There is a reason why financials was important in the past. Since women also have careers now, it leaves fewer spots for men to be high earners. You just end up creating more men who have "less" to offer. In quotes, because technically they do offer something on a societal scale. Someone needs to build the roads. It's just relative to white collar work, you earn far less. This is also the main issue of equality. The more equality in t…
/r/MensRights05/04/25 08:32 PM
3

People hate it when men judge others, because people know that they will be seen as lesser. They don't mind playing the judge and seeing others as lesser. It's just a lazy victim complex. Play life they you wanna play. These people will never get out of their victim complex. Cry babies.
/r/MensRights05/04/25 04:05 PM
20

Girls be lying. We be lying sometimes. Especially if it's a celebrity. Idk how we haven't figured this out by now. This is rather an understatement. This charade has been going like this, precisely because they constantly lie about everything in order to avoid accountability. There is a reason why lack of accountability is a common phrase in this subreddit.
/r/MensRights05/04/25 03:04 PM
2

Democrats are notorious for their lip-service. All talk, no play. They're like every activist. They will at most make one small easy change and claim moral superiority. They don't have a plan for everyone. They just want to fill their own friends' pockets and claim that they helped them. Giving money is easy. Creating a source of income is a whole different game. They're notorious for giving rights to everyone, but will never ever have a conversation about duty. The lower class workforce is stil…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/25 03:01 PM
-2

Feminism is all about rights, but not once has it spoken about women's duties. They just want women to do whatever they want. That's all fun and games, until responsibility needs to be taken, like the draft. You can't just pick and choose whatever you want. People talked about the draft for everyone, but the reality is that applying the draft for everyone is very impractical ang generally would lead to men being drafted and whatever women they can pick. One way or another, it would lead to men b…
/r/MensRights01/04/25 06:55 PM
4

The easy answer is to judge back. It's easy to judge someone, but the moment people judge back, they want to hold on to their victim mentality. If people want to have a say on you, you get to have as much to say on them. It's that easy. If you're an incel, they're a left over. Sexism is a two way street.
/r/MensRights31/03/25 05:11 PM
8

Feminists will never admit how they manage to scam a big group of women in Capitalism. It's like a multi marketing scam. As someone mentioned, it's a zero sum game. It's similar to the diploma and job problem. There is an oversaturation of people with diplomas, but not enough jobs. Logically, not everyone is going to get a highly paid job. You can endlessly blame the system all you want, but when your fellow sisters aren't getting their part of the cake, you're going to have to be able to explai…
/r/MensRights30/03/25 08:57 PM
1

Traitors.
/r/MensRights29/03/25 04:46 PM
1

A lot of women's behaviors are quite performative. Yes, women do have multiple guys available, but what people don't see is how these guys are viewed as low quality. It's about giving the illusion of value, despite that you actually not see it. Nobody believes the same thing when a big girl claims the same thing, because you know it's statistically very unlikely. A lot of women view themselves purely from their own perspective and judge them according to their own standards. It's similar to how …
/r/MensRights27/03/25 05:38 PM
4

To satisfy the women who ran away at the worst times possible? You mean, to satisfy the very people who most likely want nothing to do with you in these times? You have better luck selling water to a fish.
/r/MensRights26/03/25 09:50 PM
10

People gave decent answers here, but let me add something to this. A lot of women pursue highly paid jobs that are given by the patriarchy. Why? Weren't we supposed to dismantle the patriarchy? Aren't you technically supporting it then?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/25 09:06 PM
2

Surpassing 13.6 M isn't going to be as easy as you think.
/r/MensRights25/03/25 04:31 PM
3

They're playing the moral judge. The problem with them is that they will do anything to be superior moralist. It's not hard to be the moral judge when you're judging others, when you don't have to actually fix issues. This is for example the issue with the woman and Taliban. They love promoting women's rights in Afghanistan, but they seem to forget that the Americans were fighting there in the past. None of them will die for their rights, but it's always one of the issues mentioned in order to j…
/r/MensRights25/03/25 04:26 PM
2

What if I told you that creating traffic between groups reduce the eco chamber effect. I have considered that as well, but the reality is different. Every male subreddit that did that lost their male voice. Every post and comment just get bombarded with downvotes and any opinion that support their ideology get upvoted. This group isn't as big as, for example, TwoX. As much I don't like the echo chamber effect, I don't think there is much of a choice here, if we want to at least have clear male o…
/r/MensRights25/03/25 02:51 PM
7

People are obsessed about getting a good perception towards women. You cannot criticize women without getting a judgement back. They're perfect human beings who worked hard and should have succeeded, but are somehow, always victims of society in one way or another.
/r/MensRights23/03/25 12:31 AM
6

I'm more concerned how a bunch of people of the opposite gender can protest for decades about others meddling in their business can come around and argue how men have to behave. Either, we all get to say about everything, or nobody gets to meddle in anyone's business. Just shut up already. Men having a conscience and control over their own body is the cornerstone of the patriarchy. If men don't behave in a way that they benefit, it's toxic. Else, it's positive.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/03/25 11:57 PM
13

There is no point in having civil conversations with people who don't behave civilly. No need to play everything fair. There was tons of opportunity to make society fair and equal, but they rejected for their own greed. They have been using buzzwords for decades. Call out people who use labels, if needed, slap labels at them. They don't understand any other language than that.
/r/MensRights21/03/25 03:04 PM
1

This entire new (feminist) framework is based on men having no self-interest. Regardless of whatever influencer, ideology you look at this from, they more or less all promote similar thing. That there is a reward. The current framework is all about Work and shut up about what you want or expect from others. They see men working as just gears in the machine. They see men working, especially in the working class, as being part of their society. They see women's participation as choice. Women can p…
/r/MensRights21/03/25 01:29 PM
8

I'm more concerned about the fact that a group of people that claims to be oppressed by the patriarchy is also the one who are the most educated and looking for the very jobs that this patriarchy offers. They actively reject to be part of the working class. They're elitist who pretend to care about the working class. They don't care who is part of the working class, as long as they aren't part of it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/25 05:47 PM
22

We tried to talk. They called us names. The discussion ship has sailed a long time ago. They cannot see themselves beyond the underdog of society. Fixing societal issues was never part of the ideology. It's all about their dissatisfaction. People still want to talk about the pay gap in 2025 after being proven wrong. Instead, people just made up another gap to convince themselves how oppressed. Anything that others have, they should have too. You cannot win a discussion with someone who believes …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/25 03:18 PM
1

I think most of the things have been said, but what's wrong with a lesser life? A lesser life is still a pretty good life.
/r/MensRights13/03/25 01:11 PM
21

I'm more surprised that people still use dating apps. That shit is dead to me.
/r/MensRights12/03/25 02:35 PM
3

Let's do a reverse. i remember I asked a man what he wants. A woman who looks fit and attractive. Next year, she worked her ass off to look incredibly fit and dressed attractively. All she had to do is spend money on things she supposedly already spends on. Same moral of the story.
/r/MensRights11/03/25 01:06 PM
3

If you care about equality (that involves getting all men getting higher class jobs), you are a men's right supporter.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/25 09:05 PM
1

You make the assumption here that Unions would give men better jobs. It would just end up making us doing the dirty laundry of society. The very thing we have been trying to avoid. There is also absolutely no incentive to do these jobs, unless they severely overpay with respect to all the other jobs or you're magically couple these people with their ideal partner.
/r/MensRights10/03/25 06:44 PM
1

Because they are part of the patriarchy. They're the patriarchy. They're part of institutions who control the media.
/r/MensRights10/03/25 06:37 PM
2

Feminists are Elite collectivists. They want to give hard jobs to everyone, but themselves. They deserve good jobs. They deserve a higher class, because they work. That's all they have. Whatever happens to actual societal structures and the unevenness of certain job fields, we don't want to have conversations. Cherry picking season at its peak.
/r/MensRights10/03/25 06:33 PM
1

Everyone screams to dismantle the patriarchy, but nobody really has a clue on what to dismantle exactly and just dismantle everything that makes them feel like they're oppressed. They want more female representation? Check. They want more equality? Check. The moment we start talking about all sorts of structural issues, like lack of lower class job participation, we still want to focus on more women's issues. People are starving of hunger and the only interest is making women's life more comfort…
/r/MensRights10/03/25 01:57 AM
7

There are too many Feminists in these institutions that promote these bs ideologies. Boycott The guardian!
/r/MensRights10/03/25 12:30 AM
8

They can try to conscript all they want, but people will resist, especially after the last twenty years. They should have thought about it before applying all these ideologies without our permission. If Feminism can reject their gender role, so can we. I'm not a cannon fodder. Stop objectifying me.
/r/MensRights10/03/25 12:26 AM
1

“Who started the wars” Who profited from it? When bad stuff happen, we're not a team. When good stuff happen, we're a team. They're worse than turncoats.
/r/MensRights08/03/25 04:59 PM
4

They don't even want to be at top. They want to salary of the top. Put them at the top, drop the salary to minimum wage and watch people walk away from it. Is this the Collectivism that Feminism is talking about? The teamwork? A bunch of broad classists want to talk about efficiency, but let's talk about the people who aren't efficient. What about those people? Do we put more women in factories? What about quotas? Just because men are stronger, doesn't mean that they don't want to do the dirty w…
/r/MensRights08/03/25 04:46 PM
11

Feminism is all about collectivism, as long as they get to be the elite. It's all about artificially blowing up the price for a woman, whether this is in the workforce, dating or anything else in society. It's cherrypickism. It's a dead movement that holds on to its victim complex like a child who just learnt about nihilism. It argues like a child who learnt that she has to do chores, but doesn't think should, because she didn't choose to be born. As if everything in our lives is a free choice (…
/r/MensRights07/03/25 04:27 PM
1

Corporations can leave at any point. If the price of labor is too expensive, they can just leave anywhere else. There will be quickly an oversaturation of men in the field, don't forget the involvement of immigrants. You will be fighting for a job with other men. Companies can do whatever they want in this market in terms of price of labor. You will be supporting and providing a social net for people in society. There isn't anything wrong with this, but considering the last ten to twenty years, …
/r/MensRights07/03/25 01:19 PM
17

If I was a politician, I would have resigned by now. This is something politics not necessarily can solve. Purely from gender equality standpoint, they have been pretending to try to attract women in blue collar jobs. The excuse has always been that women don't want to do it. For them, it should be voluntary whatever it costs. So now, they have an excess of women in white collar jobs. They want to give all the men the blue collar jobs, but they don't want them either. They cannot give more men w…
/r/MensRights03/03/25 11:35 PM
5

I'm quite excited to be honest. Make the gap bigger and you get even more hate towards yourself, because you promised everyone equality, yet can't deliver. With enough people starving, they're going to have to explain to people how people cannot sustain themselves, while coincidentally, they're living their dream life. This is progress to them, but they don't see the knot that they're tying that will inevitably hang them if it is not already hanging them.
/r/MensRights03/03/25 11:20 PM
14

They don't want equality though. If you look at women's subreddits, you will notice that regardless of how a man works, they seem to be always above a man. I have yet to find a woman who is less than a man, and thus has to earn this man through insane hard work. Equality means, equality to the man they want. Not to the man they don't want. Equality in the workforce means equality in the higher class jobs. Not the lower class jobs. You can go on and on about this.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 08:17 PM
1

What jobs are we talking about? You will have to be specific here. Lower class jobs? Higher class jobs?
/r/MensRights28/02/25 03:08 PM
1

What's your plan, chief? Should we do the same thing like Feminism did? Just stop doing things? It would collapse everything. Selling male culture is tough, because the question then becomes what you want to sell. A lot of the parts of male culture is social conditioning. Nobody likes to do the things men do, but if you want a certain kind of reward, you do it. There are parts that are directly linked to women. A lot of the social conditioning doesn't work anymore, because a lot of women are a t…
/r/MensRights28/02/25 05:25 AM
-9

Elaborate.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 05:14 AM
1

Because they rob men.
/r/MensRights25/02/25 03:36 AM
8

Women are more educated than ever before. They all want those jobs. You're getting a new issue, which is that there is lack of women in the lower class work force. What's your plan to solve this, chief? It's easy to promote wanted jobs. Try promoting the jobs that no woman wants to do.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 04:25 PM
1

I'm going to be critical here and ask the same question that I would ask Feminists. Define equality. There is no clear definition for equality. The way people define is like walking to a rich neighborhood and say that you don't care about money and only date people for personality. People lie about what they want to cover up their high standards and call it 'minimal'. Anything that is defined with equal is never met with an equal proposition. It's just worded that way to justify their own greed …
/r/MensRights23/02/25 04:43 PM
3

How are they supposed to do that? Their argument towards their lack of participation in the lower class has always been: "Men don't want to do it too.". Their entire plan rest on letting everyone else do the dirty work and promoting themselves to the upper echelon. They're the very thing they condemn. Regardless of how you view this, without a proper sacrifice, they're not going to make it, which would obviously contradict their ideology and crumb everything to the ground. This is a lose-lose si…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/25 09:54 PM
6

I find the conversations about consent always so interesting. The only reason we are still in the position where we have to ask consent is because of their own passiveness. I am willing to bet a good amount of money that if there were more women asking, they would break this consent rule far more, especially since they're not used to do it. It's such a position of luxury to let everyone do the work and then complain about the work.
/r/MensRights22/02/25 05:11 PM
4

Who would have thought that having infinite number of cultures in your community would lead to fighting for a dominant position in that community. Inclusivity is all fun and games, until you start to prioritize one group and the rest gets left behind. The left has yet to find out the flaws in their plan.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/25 03:22 PM
23

Over the years, I've encountered so many hard working men, yet even they were single. It never made sense to me how merit lead to nothing to people. You cannot convince me that even the most average guy is being equalized to a fat below average woman. It can't be that for some reason, every guy is always in a position of weakness who has to impress even the least attractive women. I think that all of you need to take a more passive woman role. Be the one who needs to be impressed and won over. C…
/r/MensRights21/02/25 08:57 PM
1

How do you exactly expect them to do anything differently? Democrats are broken within themselves in terms of ideology. Ideology A brings men. Ideology B brings women. They can't have it both ways. The cultural dilemma that the democrats are in isn't an easy fix. People can barely take accountability and you expect them to take accountability over the two decades of mistakes they made, because they were too hung over the idea that they understand men better than men, so they needed more female r…
/r/MensRights19/02/25 02:04 PM
1

Your assumption is two things: They want to have a family with us. We want a family with them. Take into account that both parties have to work now, so regardless of where you come from, it's a partnership. Lastly, take into account that a lot of relationship dynamics and the framework for it are even worse than in the past. The number of expectations have skyrocketed. Try selling this to someone within the working class who works 9-5 for too little to come home to do labor including romantic la…
/r/MensRights18/02/25 11:59 PM
17

This is similar to how women will tell others that they're beautiful as they are and don't need to change. The amount of lying that these people do to draw themselves as heroines and saviors of the world is insane. She is insane.
/r/MensRights18/02/25 12:46 AM
3

If we are all victims of capitalims, how about a five step plan to make men rich or at the very least very financially wealthy? Considering that the economy has been spiraling downwards and there is a heavy lack of people in the lower class workforce, they better show us a good plan on how to approah this. The constant focus on uplifting their own people is so obvious, but not a single finger has been lifted to make sure that the very population that carries their asses is being rewarded accordi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/02/25 10:50 PM
11

Add to this that there is also a surge of articles that describe how women are happier single and carry the relationships. Somehow, everyone is incredibly lonely on days like valentine's day, but women are all happy? It's almost like they're doing everything in their power to not show how bad everything is going. Under no circumstances do I ever believe articles. They're downplaying everything on women's side or just not showing at all as if this circumstance is even realistic on a population sc…
/r/MensRights15/02/25 03:43 AM
1

We won't go further at the moment than we already are. The objective is to make everything collapse, since they're not willing to go beyond their own ideology. Starvation is a good motivator to make people choose sides and escalate everything. It's all about isolating their own people, since they don't go further than providing lip service for their own allies.
/r/MensRights11/02/25 11:29 PM
2

The people who have their resources don't care, until poverty strikes and there are no resources left to support themselves. Personally, I tend to hear far more complaints from (lower class) women than this article wants to report. It's denialism of economic, social and cultural issue.
/r/MensRights09/02/25 10:42 PM
1

It makes even less sense when you start to think about idea of group responsibility in society. Seemingly, we're only a society for the good times. When bad times happen, it's because everyone, but me. Honestly, why are they still here if we're so bad.
/r/MensRights09/02/25 10:11 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter