| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Do. Not. Deal. With. Shitty. Women. Period.I didn't realize until just right now that the Table Theory site was yours. I didn't see the username on Table Theory. When you linked to it, I read about shit tests and other posts you had and then subscribed to the RSS. Your thoughts are well laid out, clear, and free of bullshit. Well done. | /r/seduction | 12/03/13 07:10 PM |
| 1 | Do women prefer less sexually-threatening men?She probably meant he's confident, interesting, and not creepy. | /r/seduction | 12/03/13 05:29 PM |
| 3 | Do. Not. Deal. With. Shitty. Women. Period.Oh, man. If I still had arms and at least half an eye, we'd so be fighting, right now. | /r/seduction | 11/03/13 09:18 PM |
| 2 | Do. Not. Deal. With. Shitty. Women. Period.I found your problem: Chuck Norris is old. Tighten that shit up. | /r/seduction | 11/03/13 05:16 PM |
| 3 | Do. Not. Deal. With. Shitty. Women. Period.There's also a chance that you're considering normal conversation to be shit tests. You are constantly being "tested" in the sense that you're being observed and judged on everything you say and do. You should also being doing this with her. But this isn't shit testing. Even a question about where you work isn't a shit test. It's likely a test, yes. But every test isn't a shit test. Even if the question makes you feel uncomfortable or leaves you unbalanced because you're not proud of your job, t… | /r/seduction | 11/03/13 04:46 PM |
| 2 | Do. Not. Deal. With. Shitty. Women. Period.Your last point about there not being much of a difference between a shit test and teasing is important. Not in these talks but in real life, I make a distinction between playful conversation or inquisitive conversation and a shit test. I agree that how you react to the teasing should be the same. But a lot of what is considered a shit test isn't actually that. We also have to distinguish between a shit test and common analyzing and observation. Anyone new we're speaking to will be potentially a… | /r/seduction | 11/03/13 04:16 PM |
| 3 | Do. Not. Deal. With. Shitty. Women. Period.I suspect that if you find yourself tested routinely, there is something about your behavior that is inconsistent and begs to be tested. That's true not just with women. It's true of anyone in any situation. For instance, if a guy with a huge, round, beer belly tells you he doesn't ever drink alcohol, you're probably going to want to test him. So be honest with yourself. Are you maintaining a consistent presence? Do you truly seem the person you're trying to project? Now whether or not the test … | /r/seduction | 11/03/13 12:50 PM |
| 25 | Do. Not. Deal. With. Shitty. Women. Period.I think the testing part is still a sign of shitty character, even in the beginning. If you're observant, you don't need to test someone to see what they're made of. You just need to talk to them about different topics. And if you can see them in different social environments, even better. Tests not only are unnecessary if you are smart and observant, I suspect they're a sign of serious insecurity from the tester -- the tester trying to elevate themselves above you by setting you off-balance. Wh… | /r/seduction | 10/03/13 10:24 PM |
| 2 | 4 Rules for RelationshipsFlirting is friendly with a sexual component. If you're just friendly, that's not flirting. If you flirt with everyone, then it makes sense you'd be comfortable with your girlfriend also flirting. That works for you so keep with it. You sound like you know the type you need. For most people, male or female, flirting is a sign of dissatisfaction or disrespect. Feeling that way about flirting is reasonable, as is wanting someone with the same values. In the case of the OP, the girlfriend was most … | /r/seduction | 10/03/13 09:44 PM |
| 3 | 4 Rules for RelationshipsI agree with you. After posting it, I thought about some of the things I left out of that post that would disagree with having a discussion with her about this at all. The most important of those is that you can't change a person. If you feel they need "instruction", she's not for you. So excellent point. I think what you said needs to be repeated more often. This community talks about shit tests and how to pass them. Those shouldn't be called shit tests, though. They should be called shitty wom… | /r/seduction | 10/03/13 06:47 PM |
| 22 | 4 Rules for RelationshipsI don't agree. If a woman is flirting with other guys or other females, that's disrespectful. You might gain respect in her eyes by not saying anything about it. But a good woman doesn't test you like that. A good woman doesn't try to knock you down to see how you will react. She doesn't show interest in other guys while you show disinterest and convince yourself you're not a cuckold. Instead of shutting your mouth and letting her disrespect you again, after the party, you tell her calmly that s… | /r/seduction | 10/03/13 05:19 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter