| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Mr. Morgan makes a fair pointHi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman": A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win… | /r/MensRights | 21/01/17 11:30 PM |
| 1 | Thanks to Donations from MensRights, Austin, a teen boy prosecuted for child porn after received pictures from his girlfriend, won't go to prison or register as a sex offender, but his mistreatment by the state still isn't over yetHi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman": A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win… | /r/MensRights | 21/01/17 06:26 AM |
| 1 | Tips from my tinder success. Most can be attributed to the same principles people preach here.Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman": A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win… | /r/TheRedPill | 20/01/17 10:51 PM |
| 3 | This feels WAY better than sex and being a stud-muffinHi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman": A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win… | /r/seduction | 20/01/17 08:55 PM |
| 2 | This man is reversing back from the wall. I have seen it with other men before. But never women. Women only approach the wall, never backs away.Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Ad Hominem": Argumentum ad hominem (from the Latin, "to the person") is an informal logical fallacy that occurs when someone attempts to refute an argument by attacking the source making it rather than the argument itself. The fallacy is a subset of the genetic fallacy as it attacks the source of the argument, which is irrelevant to to the truth or falsity of the argument. An ad hominem should not be confused with an insult, which attacks the person but does not… | /r/MGTOW | 20/01/17 04:36 PM |
| 0 | This Guy WINS the Internet ! XDHi! Here's a summary of the term "Ad Hominem": Argumentum ad hominem (from the Latin, "to the person") is an informal logical fallacy that occurs when someone attempts to refute an argument by attacking the source making it rather than the argument itself. The fallacy is a subset of the genetic fallacy as it attacks the source of the argument, which is irrelevant to to the truth or falsity of the argument. An ad hominem should not be confused with an insult, which attacks the person but does not… | /r/MGTOW | 20/01/17 04:23 PM |
| 7 | Women advises raping your husband when he doesn't want to have sex with you. Other women chime in and agree.Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman": A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win… | /r/MensRights | 20/01/17 12:59 PM |
| 1 | How I convinced my ex to get an abortionHi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman": A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win… | /r/MGTOW | 20/01/17 10:12 AM |
| 0 | Why are MRA's labeled as misogynists?Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman": A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win… | /r/MensRights | 20/01/17 05:26 AM |
| 1 | Why are MRA's labeled as misogynists?Hi! Here's a summary of the term "No True Scotsman": The No True Scotsman NTS fallacy is a logical fallacy that occurs when a debater defines a group such that every groupmember posses some quality. For example, it is common to argue that "all members of [my religion] are fundamentally good", and then to abandon all bad individuals as "not true [my-religion]-people". This can occur in two ways: During argument, someone re-defines the group in order to exclude counter-examples. Instead of backing… | /r/MensRights | 20/01/17 04:10 AM |
| 2 | GamerGate: A personal reflection on what brought me to TRPHi! Here's a summary of the term "Ad Hominem": Argumentum ad hominem (from the Latin, "to the person") is an informal logical fallacy that occurs when someone attempts to refute an argument by attacking the source making it rather than the argument itself. The fallacy is a subset of the genetic fallacy as it attacks the source of the argument, which is irrelevant to to the truth or falsity of the argument. An ad hominem should not be confused with an insult, which attacks the person but does not… | /r/TheRedPill | 20/01/17 04:08 AM |
| 1 | Why are MRA's labeled as misogynists?Hi! Here's a summary of the term "No True Scotsman": The No True Scotsman NTS fallacy is a logical fallacy that occurs when a debater defines a group such that every groupmember posses some quality. For example, it is common to argue that "all members of [my religion] are fundamentally good", and then to abandon all bad individuals as "not true [my-religion]-people". This can occur in two ways: During argument, someone re-defines the group in order to exclude counter-examples. Instead of backing… | /r/MensRights | 20/01/17 04:00 AM |
| 1 | By every single metric, men have it worse than womenHi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman": A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win… | /r/MensRights | 19/01/17 06:38 AM |
| 1 | By every single metric, men have it worse than womenHi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman": A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win… | /r/MensRights | 19/01/17 06:34 AM |
| 1 | By every single metric, men have it worse than women<sup>Hi!</sup> <sup>Here's</sup> <sup>a</sup> <sup>summary</sup> <sup>of</sup> <sup>the</sup> <sup>term</sup> <sup>"Strawman":</sup> ^<sup>A</sup> ^<sup>straw</sup> ^<sup>man</sup> ^<sup>is</sup> ^<sup>logical</sup> ^<sup>fallacy</sup> ^<sup>that</sup> ^<sup>occurs</sup> ^<sup>when</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>debater</sup> ^<sup>intentionally</sup> ^<sup>misrepresents</sup> ^<sup>their</sup> ^<sup>opponent's</sup> ^<sup>argument</sup> ^<sup>as</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>weaker</sup> ^<sup>version</… | /r/MensRights | 19/01/17 06:31 AM |
| 1 | By every single metric, men have it worse than women<sup>Hi!</sup> <sup>Here's</sup> <sup>a</sup> <sup>summary</sup> <sup>of</sup> <sup>the</sup> <sup>term</sup> <sup>"Strawman":</sup> ^<sup>A</sup> ^<sup>straw</sup> ^<sup>man</sup> ^<sup>is</sup> ^<sup>logical</sup> ^<sup>fallacy</sup> ^<sup>that</sup> ^<sup>occurs</sup> ^<sup>when</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>debater</sup> ^<sup>intentionally</sup> ^<sup>misrepresents</sup> ^<sup>their</sup> ^<sup>opponent's</sup> ^<sup>argument</sup> ^<sup>as</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>weaker</sup> ^<sup>version</… | /r/MensRights | 19/01/17 06:24 AM |
| 2 | By every single metric, men have it worse than women<sup>Hi!</sup> <sup>Here's</sup> <sup>a</sup> <sup>summary</sup> <sup>of</sup> <sup>the</sup> <sup>term</sup> <sup>"Appeal</sup> <sup>to</sup> <sup>Authority":</sup> ^<sup>An</sup> ^<sup>argument</sup> ^<sup>from</sup> ^<sup>authority ^<sup>refers</sup> ^<sup>to</sup> ^<sup>two</sup> ^<sup>kinds</sup> ^<sup>of</sup> ^<sup>arguments:</sup> ^<sup>1.</sup> ^<sup>A</sup> ^<sup>logically</sup> ^<sup>valid</sup> ^<sup>argument</sup> ^<sup>from</sup> ^<sup>authority</sup> ^<sup>grounds</sup> ^<sup>a</s… | /r/MensRights | 19/01/17 06:17 AM |
| 1 | Just a quick reminder for anyone who has forgotten -- men have it worse.Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman": A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win… | /r/MensRights | 18/01/17 11:40 PM |
| 1 | "Be Yourself" is GOOD advice. Here is what people don't understand about the phrase.^Hi! ^Here's ^a ^summary ^of ^the ^term ^"Strawman": ^^A ^^straw ^^man ^^is ^^logical ^^fallacy ^^that ^^occurs ^^when ^^a ^^debater ^^intentionally ^^misrepresents ^^their ^^opponent's ^^argument ^^as ^^a ^^weaker ^^version ^^and ^^rebuts ^^that ^^weak ^^& ^^fake ^^version ^^rather ^^than ^^their ^^opponent's ^^genuine ^^argument. ^^Intentional ^^strawmanning ^^usually ^^has ^^the ^^goal ^^of ^^[1] ^^avoiding ^^real ^^debate ^^against ^^their ^^opponent's ^^real ^^argument, ^^because ^^the ^^mi… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/17 11:30 PM |
| 1 | How the media reports female child rapists.<sup>Hi!</sup> <sup>Here's</sup> <sup>a</sup> <sup>summary</sup> <sup>of</sup> <sup>the</sup> <sup>term</sup> <sup>"Strawman":</sup> ^<sup>A</sup> ^<sup>straw</sup> ^<sup>man</sup> ^<sup>is</sup> ^<sup>logical</sup> ^<sup>fallacy</sup> ^<sup>that</sup> ^<sup>occurs</sup> ^<sup>when</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>debater</sup> ^<sup>intentionally</sup> ^<sup>misrepresents</sup> ^<sup>their</sup> ^<sup>opponent's</sup> ^<sup>argument</sup> ^<sup>as</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>weaker</sup> ^<sup>version</… | /r/MensRights | 18/01/17 08:54 PM |
| 1 | How the media reports female child rapists.<sup>Hi!</sup> <sup>Here's</sup> <sup>a</sup> <sup>summary</sup> <sup>of</sup> <sup>the</sup> <sup>term</sup> <sup>"Strawman":</sup> ^<sup>A</sup> ^<sup>straw</sup> ^<sup>man</sup> ^<sup>is</sup> ^<sup>logical</sup> ^<sup>fallacy</sup> ^<sup>that</sup> ^<sup>occurs</sup> ^<sup>when</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>debater</sup> ^<sup>intentionally</sup> ^<sup>misrepresents</sup> ^<sup>their</sup> ^<sup>opponent's</sup> ^<sup>argument</sup> ^<sup>as</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>weaker</sup> ^<sup>version</… | /r/MensRights | 18/01/17 08:28 PM |
| 1 | "We've been lied to" stories.<sup>Hi!</sup> <sup>Here's</sup> <sup>a</sup> <sup>summary</sup> <sup>of</sup> <sup>the</sup> <sup>term</sup> <sup>"Strawman":</sup> ^<sup>A</sup> ^<sup>straw</sup> ^<sup>man</sup> ^<sup>is</sup> ^<sup>logical</sup> ^<sup>fallacy</sup> ^<sup>that</sup> ^<sup>occurs</sup> ^<sup>when</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>debater</sup> ^<sup>intentionally</sup> ^<sup>misrepresents</sup> ^<sup>their</sup> ^<sup>opponent's</sup> ^<sup>argument</sup> ^<sup>as</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>weaker</sup> ^<sup>version</… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/17 07:22 PM |
| 1 | How to lead a fascinating life with minimal effortHi! Here's a summary of the term "Ad Hominem": Argumentum ad hominem (from the Latin, "to the person") is an informal logical fallacy that occurs when someone attempts to refute an argument by attacking the source making it rather than the argument itself. The fallacy is a subset of the genetic fallacy as it attacks the source of the argument, which is irrelevant to to the truth or falsity of the argument. An ad hominem should not be confused with an insult, which attacks the person but does not… | /r/TheRedPill | 18/01/17 05:43 PM |
| 1 | "She's Probably Out Getting Fucked"<sup>Hi!</sup> <sup>Here's</sup> <sup>a</sup> <sup>summary</sup> <sup>of</sup> <sup>the</sup> <sup>term</sup> <sup>"No</sup> <sup>True</sup> <sup>Scotsman":</sup> ^<sup>The</sup> ^<sup>No</sup> ^<sup>True</sup> ^<sup>Scotsman</sup> <sup><sup>NTS</sup></sup> ^<sup>fallacy</sup> ^<sup>is</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>logical</sup> ^<sup>fallacy</sup> ^<sup>that</sup> ^<sup>occurs</sup> ^<sup>when</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>debater</sup> ^<sup>defines</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>group</sup> ^<sup>such</su… | /r/TheRedPill | 18/01/17 05:11 PM |
| 1 | "We've been lied to" stories.Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman": A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/17 05:11 PM |
| 4 | Wall hitter flips out over Tinder rejectionHi! Here's a summary of the term "Ad Hominem": Argumentum ad hominem (from the Latin, "to the person") is an informal logical fallacy that occurs when someone attempts to refute an argument by attacking the source making it rather than the argument itself. The fallacy is a subset of the genetic fallacy as it attacks the source of the argument, which is irrelevant to to the truth or falsity of the argument. An ad hominem should not be confused with an insult, which attacks the person but does not… | /r/MGTOW | 18/01/17 04:48 PM |
| 3 | By every single metric, men have it worse than womenHi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman": A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win… | /r/MensRights | 18/01/17 04:35 PM |
| 1 | CMV: 'Beta' is the term bitter men use to shame women who get what they want from their partner. The male equivalent of the post-30 women shaming men for not wanting a 'mature' woman.Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman": A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/17 04:28 PM |
| 2 | Just a quick reminder for anyone who has forgotten -- men have it worse.Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman": A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win… | /r/MensRights | 18/01/17 04:26 PM |
| 1 | CMV: 'Beta' is the term bitter men use to shame women who get what they want from their partner. The male equivalent of the post-30 women shaming men for not wanting a 'mature' woman.Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman": A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/17 03:41 PM |
| 7 | Don't use your children like that. It's shameful!Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman": A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 18/01/17 03:32 PM |
| 6 | Just a quick reminder for anyone who has forgotten -- men have it worse.Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman": A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win… | /r/MensRights | 18/01/17 02:10 PM |
| 1 | CMV: 'Beta' is the term bitter men use to shame women who get what they want from their partner. The male equivalent of the post-30 women shaming men for not wanting a 'mature' woman.Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman": A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/17 01:41 PM |
| 1 | Is there anything positive about TBP?Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman": A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/17 12:16 PM |
| 1 | Is there anything positive about TBP?Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman": A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/17 12:06 PM |
| 1 | Is there anything positive about TBP?Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman": A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/17 11:17 AM |
| 1 | Pictured for the first time: Mother, 27, who dumped her newborn baby in a bin in hospital toilets but it SURVIVED after being found three hours later by a cleaner who heard muffled squeaking noise<sup>Hi!</sup> <sup>Here's</sup> <sup>a</sup> <sup>summary</sup> <sup>of</sup> <sup>the</sup> <sup>term</sup> <sup>"No</sup> <sup>True</sup> <sup>Scotsman":</sup> ^<sup>The</sup> ^<sup>No</sup> ^<sup>True</sup> ^<sup>Scotsman</sup> <sup><sup>NTS</sup></sup> ^<sup>fallacy</sup> ^<sup>is</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>logical</sup> ^<sup>fallacy</sup> ^<sup>that</sup> ^<sup>occurs</sup> ^<sup>when</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>debater</sup> ^<sup>defines</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>group</sup> ^<sup>such</su… | /r/MensRights | 18/01/17 03:23 AM |
| 1 | The Beta Male: Evolutionary Slave of WomenHi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman": A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win… | /r/TheRedPill | 18/01/17 02:55 AM |
| 1 | Body Language Expert attracted towards Vladimir Putin while observing his dominant traitsHi! Here's a summary of the term "Ad Hominem": Argumentum ad hominem (from the Latin, "to the person") is an informal logical fallacy that occurs when someone attempts to refute an argument by attacking the source making it rather than the argument itself. The fallacy is a subset of the genetic fallacy as it attacks the source of the argument, which is irrelevant to to the truth or falsity of the argument. An ad hominem should not be confused with an insult, which attacks the person but does not… | /r/TheRedPill | 18/01/17 02:55 AM |
| 1 | Body Language Expert attracted towards Vladimir Putin while observing his dominant traitsHi! Here's a summary of the term "Ad Hominem": Argumentum ad hominem (from the Latin, "to the person") is an informal logical fallacy that occurs when someone attempts to refute an argument by attacking the source making it rather than the argument itself. The fallacy is a subset of the genetic fallacy as it attacks the source of the argument, which is irrelevant to to the truth or falsity of the argument. An ad hominem should not be confused with an insult, which attacks the person but does not… | /r/TheRedPill | 18/01/17 02:34 AM |
| 1 | Don't Fall Into the NoFap Trap.Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman": A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win… | /r/TheRedPill | 18/01/17 01:48 AM |
| 1 | CMV: Avoiding 'pumping and dumping' is extremely easy and something most women know how to do.<sup>Hi!</sup> <sup>Here's</sup> <sup>a</sup> <sup>summary</sup> <sup>of</sup> <sup>the</sup> <sup>term</sup> <sup>"Strawman":</sup> ^<sup>A</sup> ^<sup>straw</sup> ^<sup>man</sup> ^<sup>is</sup> ^<sup>logical</sup> ^<sup>fallacy</sup> ^<sup>that</sup> ^<sup>occurs</sup> ^<sup>when</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>debater</sup> ^<sup>intentionally</sup> ^<sup>misrepresents</sup> ^<sup>their</sup> ^<sup>opponent's</sup> ^<sup>argument</sup> ^<sup>as</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>weaker</sup> ^<sup>version</… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/17 12:38 AM |
| 1 | CMV: Avoiding 'pumping and dumping' is extremely easy and something most women know how to do.Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman": A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/01/17 10:30 PM |
| 1 | Question4BP: if you view RP as negative I have a few questions<sup>Hi!</sup> <sup>Here's</sup> <sup>a</sup> <sup>summary</sup> <sup>of</sup> <sup>the</sup> <sup>term</sup> <sup>"Strawman":</sup> ^<sup>A</sup> ^<sup>straw</sup> ^<sup>man</sup> ^<sup>is</sup> ^<sup>logical</sup> ^<sup>fallacy</sup> ^<sup>that</sup> ^<sup>occurs</sup> ^<sup>when</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>debater</sup> ^<sup>intentionally</sup> ^<sup>misrepresents</sup> ^<sup>their</sup> ^<sup>opponent's</sup> ^<sup>argument</sup> ^<sup>as</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>weaker</sup> ^<sup>version</… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/01/17 10:08 PM |
| 2 | TRP has gone to shit thanks to new manginas and what you can do about itHi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman": A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win… | /r/TheRedPill | 17/01/17 05:32 AM |
| 2 | TRP has gone to shit thanks to new manginas and what you can do about itHi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman": A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win… | /r/TheRedPill | 17/01/17 04:39 AM |
| 1 | Q4RP: Is RP theory universal? On what kind of women would RP tactics /not/ work?<sup>Hi!</sup> <sup>Here's</sup> <sup>a</sup> <sup>summary</sup> <sup>of</sup> <sup>the</sup> <sup>term</sup> <sup>"Strawman":</sup> ^<sup>A</sup> ^<sup>straw</sup> ^<sup>man</sup> ^<sup>is</sup> ^<sup>logical</sup> ^<sup>fallacy</sup> ^<sup>that</sup> ^<sup>occurs</sup> ^<sup>when</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>debater</sup> ^<sup>intentionally</sup> ^<sup>misrepresents</sup> ^<sup>their</sup> ^<sup>opponent's</sup> ^<sup>argument</sup> ^<sup>as</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>weaker</sup> ^<sup>version</… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/01/17 04:24 AM |
| 1 | Q4RP: Is RP theory universal? On what kind of women would RP tactics /not/ work?<sup>Hi!</sup> <sup>Here's</sup> <sup>a</sup> <sup>summary</sup> <sup>of</sup> <sup>the</sup> <sup>term</sup> <sup>"Strawman":</sup> ^<sup>A</sup> ^<sup>straw</sup> ^<sup>man</sup> ^<sup>is</sup> ^<sup>logical</sup> ^<sup>fallacy</sup> ^<sup>that</sup> ^<sup>occurs</sup> ^<sup>when</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>debater</sup> ^<sup>intentionally</sup> ^<sup>misrepresents</sup> ^<sup>their</sup> ^<sup>opponent's</sup> ^<sup>argument</sup> ^<sup>as</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>weaker</sup> ^<sup>version</… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/01/17 03:48 AM |
| 1 | White Men Need Not Apply. No Men Allowed to Run in Upcoming Election for Popular BC Political Party<sup>Hi!</sup> <sup>Here's</sup> <sup>a</sup> <sup>summary</sup> <sup>of</sup> <sup>the</sup> <sup>term</sup> <sup>"Strawman":</sup> ^<sup>A</sup> ^<sup>straw</sup> ^<sup>man</sup> ^<sup>is</sup> ^<sup>logical</sup> ^<sup>fallacy</sup> ^<sup>that</sup> ^<sup>occurs</sup> ^<sup>when</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>debater</sup> ^<sup>intentionally</sup> ^<sup>misrepresents</sup> ^<sup>their</sup> ^<sup>opponent's</sup> ^<sup>argument</sup> ^<sup>as</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>weaker</sup> ^<sup>version</… | /r/MensRights | 17/01/17 02:44 AM |
| 1 | White Men Need Not Apply. No Men Allowed to Run in Upcoming Election for Popular BC Political Party<sup>Hi!</sup> <sup>Here's</sup> <sup>a</sup> <sup>summary</sup> <sup>of</sup> <sup>the</sup> <sup>term</sup> <sup>"Strawman":</sup> ^<sup>A</sup> ^<sup>straw</sup> ^<sup>man</sup> ^<sup>is</sup> ^<sup>logical</sup> ^<sup>fallacy</sup> ^<sup>that</sup> ^<sup>occurs</sup> ^<sup>when</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>debater</sup> ^<sup>intentionally</sup> ^<sup>misrepresents</sup> ^<sup>their</sup> ^<sup>opponent's</sup> ^<sup>argument</sup> ^<sup>as</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>weaker</sup> ^<sup>version</… | /r/MensRights | 17/01/17 02:38 AM |
| 1 | White Men Need Not Apply. No Men Allowed to Run in Upcoming Election for Popular BC Political Party<sup>Hi!</sup> <sup>Here's</sup> <sup>a</sup> <sup>summary</sup> <sup>of</sup> <sup>the</sup> <sup>term</sup> <sup>"Strawman":</sup> ^<sup>A</sup> ^<sup>straw</sup> ^<sup>man</sup> ^<sup>is</sup> ^<sup>logical</sup> ^<sup>fallacy</sup> ^<sup>that</sup> ^<sup>occurs</sup> ^<sup>when</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>debater</sup> ^<sup>intentionally</sup> ^<sup>misrepresents</sup> ^<sup>their</sup> ^<sup>opponent's</sup> ^<sup>argument</sup> ^<sup>as</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>weaker</sup> ^<sup>version</… | /r/MensRights | 17/01/17 02:26 AM |
| 1 | Q4RP: Is RP theory universal? On what kind of women would RP tactics /not/ work?Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman": A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/01/17 12:59 AM |
| 2 | Oppressed Emma Watson being further oppressed for our viewing pleasure?Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Ad Hominem": Argumentum ad hominem (from the Latin, "to the person") is an informal logical fallacy that occurs when someone attempts to refute an argument by attacking the source making it rather than the argument itself. The fallacy is a subset of the genetic fallacy as it attacks the source of the argument, which is irrelevant to to the truth or falsity of the argument. An ad hominem should not be confused with an insult, which attacks the person but does not… | /r/MGTOW | 17/01/17 12:20 AM |
| 1 | Oppressed Emma Watson being further oppressed for our viewing pleasure?Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Ad Hominem": Argumentum ad hominem (from the Latin, "to the person") is an informal logical fallacy that occurs when someone attempts to refute an argument by attacking the source making it rather than the argument itself. The fallacy is a subset of the genetic fallacy as it attacks the source of the argument, which is irrelevant to to the truth or falsity of the argument. An ad hominem should not be confused with an insult, which attacks the person but does not… | /r/MGTOW | 17/01/17 12:19 AM |
| -1 | TRP has gone to shit thanks to new manginas and what you can do about itHi! Here's a summary of the term "No True Scotsman": The No True Scotsman NTS fallacy is a logical fallacy that occurs when a debater defines a group such that every groupmember posses some quality. For example, it is common to argue that "all members of [my religion] are fundamentally good", and then to abandon all bad individuals as "not true [my-religion]-people". This can occur in two ways: During argument, someone re-defines the group in order to exclude counter-examples. Instead of backing… | /r/TheRedPill | 16/01/17 11:25 PM |
| 1 | why is the manospehere, redpill and other male forums shunned while feminist forums are celebrated?Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman": A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/01/17 06:18 PM |
| 1 | Red Pill has trouble with basic social cues, and that is a bigger problem in the SMP than potential lack of attractivenessHi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman": A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/01/17 04:48 PM |
| 1 | Red Pill has trouble with basic social cues, and that is a bigger problem in the SMP than potential lack of attractiveness<sup>Hi!</sup> <sup>Here's</sup> <sup>a</sup> <sup>summary</sup> <sup>of</sup> <sup>the</sup> <sup>term</sup> <sup>"Strawman":</sup> ^<sup>A</sup> ^<sup>straw</sup> ^<sup>man</sup> ^<sup>is</sup> ^<sup>logical</sup> ^<sup>fallacy</sup> ^<sup>that</sup> ^<sup>occurs</sup> ^<sup>when</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>debater</sup> ^<sup>intentionally</sup> ^<sup>misrepresents</sup> ^<sup>their</sup> ^<sup>opponent's</sup> ^<sup>argument</sup> ^<sup>as</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>weaker</sup> ^<sup>version</… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/01/17 03:59 PM |
| 2 | Q4RP: Is RP theory universal? On what kind of women would RP tactics /not/ work?Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman": A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/01/17 01:13 PM |
| 1 | Dating Double Standards: exhibit #857379052Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Ad Hominem": Argumentum ad hominem (from the Latin, "to the person") is an informal logical fallacy that occurs when someone attempts to refute an argument by attacking the source making it rather than the argument itself. The fallacy is a subset of the genetic fallacy as it attacks the source of the argument, which is irrelevant to to the truth or falsity of the argument. An ad hominem should not be confused with an insult, which attacks the person but does not… | /r/MensRights | 16/01/17 11:28 AM |
| 1 | It's romantic when women do it but predatory when men do itHi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman": A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win… | /r/MensRights | 16/01/17 02:04 AM |
| 1 | Is dating more difficult for men or for women?<sup>Hi!</sup> <sup>Here's</sup> <sup>a</sup> <sup>summary</sup> <sup>of</sup> <sup>the</sup> <sup>term</sup> <sup>"Strawman":</sup> ^<sup>A</sup> ^<sup>straw</sup> ^<sup>man</sup> ^<sup>is</sup> ^<sup>logical</sup> ^<sup>fallacy</sup> ^<sup>that</sup> ^<sup>occurs</sup> ^<sup>when</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>debater</sup> ^<sup>intentionally</sup> ^<sup>misrepresents</sup> ^<sup>their</sup> ^<sup>opponent's</sup> ^<sup>argument</sup> ^<sup>as</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>weaker</sup> ^<sup>version</… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/01/17 12:26 AM |
| 1 | Q4women: would you date a guy that shows weakness and vulnerability as much as a normal woman?<sup>Hi!</sup> <sup>Here's</sup> <sup>a</sup> <sup>summary</sup> <sup>of</sup> <sup>the</sup> <sup>term</sup> <sup>"Strawman":</sup> ^<sup>A</sup> ^<sup>straw</sup> ^<sup>man</sup> ^<sup>is</sup> ^<sup>logical</sup> ^<sup>fallacy</sup> ^<sup>that</sup> ^<sup>occurs</sup> ^<sup>when</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>debater</sup> ^<sup>intentionally</sup> ^<sup>misrepresents</sup> ^<sup>their</sup> ^<sup>opponent's</sup> ^<sup>argument</sup> ^<sup>as</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>weaker</sup> ^<sup>version</… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/01/17 12:12 AM |
| 1 | Why is having standards seen as a bad thing?Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman": A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/01/17 11:30 PM |
| 1 | TIL The domestic violence rate in lesbian relationships in twice that of gay and straight relationships<sup>Hi!</sup> <sup>Here's</sup> <sup>a</sup> <sup>summary</sup> <sup>of</sup> <sup>what</sup> <sup>a</sup> <sup>"Strawman"</sup> <sup>is:</sup> ^<sup>A</sup> ^<sup>straw</sup> ^<sup>man</sup> ^<sup>is</sup> ^<sup>logical</sup> ^<sup>fallacy</sup> ^<sup>that</sup> ^<sup>occurs</sup> ^<sup>when</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>debater</sup> ^<sup>intentionally</sup> ^<sup>misrepresents</sup> ^<sup>their</sup> ^<sup>opponent's</sup> ^<sup>argument</sup> ^<sup>as</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>weaker</sup> ^<s… | /r/MensRights | 07/01/17 11:43 PM |
| 3 | Guy finds out wife took nude photos while he was away on business tripHi! Here's a summary of what a "Strawman" is: A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus wi… | /r/TheRedPill | 07/01/17 11:42 PM |
| 3 | What other philosophy is RedPill worthy?Hi! Here's a summary of what a "Strawman" is: A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus wi… | /r/askTRP | 07/01/17 09:59 PM |
| 1 | Man asks for legal advice after slapping his physically abusive girlfriend, comments section accuses him of beating his girlfriend<sup>Hi!</sup> <sup>Here's</sup> <sup>a</sup> <sup>summary</sup> <sup>of</sup> <sup>what</sup> <sup>a</sup> <sup>"Strawman"</sup> <sup>is:</sup> ^<sup>A</sup> ^<sup>straw</sup> ^<sup>man</sup> ^<sup>is</sup> ^<sup>logical</sup> ^<sup>fallacy</sup> ^<sup>that</sup> ^<sup>occurs</sup> ^<sup>when</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>debater</sup> ^<sup>intentionally</sup> ^<sup>misrepresents</sup> ^<sup>their</sup> ^<sup>opponent's</sup> ^<sup>argument</sup> ^<sup>as</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>weaker</sup> ^<s… | /r/MensRights | 07/01/17 05:58 PM |
| 1 | CMV: “Divorce rape” is overstated and ignores the sacrifices of women<sup>Hi!</sup> <sup>Here's</sup> <sup>a</sup> <sup>summary</sup> <sup>of</sup> <sup>what</sup> <sup>an</sup> <sup>"Ad</sup> <sup>Hominem"</sup> <sup>is:</sup> ^<sup>Argumentum</sup> ^<sup>ad</sup> ^<sup>hominem</sup> ^<sup>(from</sup> ^<sup>the</sup> ^<sup>Latin,</sup> ^<sup>"to</sup> ^<sup>the</sup> ^<sup>person")</sup> ^<sup>is</sup> ^<sup>an</sup> ^<sup>informal</sup> ^<sup>logical</sup> ^<sup>fallacy</sup> ^<sup>that</sup> ^<sup>occurs</sup> ^<sup>when</sup> ^<sup>someone</sup> ^<sup>attempt… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/12/16 09:51 PM |
| 1 | Dick size matters and most women lie about itHi! Here's a summary of what a "Strawman" is: A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus wi… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/12/16 08:24 PM |
| 1 | How much does the MRA overlap with the politically right-wing?Hi! Here's a summary of what a "Strawman" is: A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus wi… | /r/MensRights | 29/12/16 07:34 PM |
| 1 | CMV: Chad or MGTOW? Do men have any other good options in the current SMP? Why should a male become "marriageable" for women?Hi! Here's a summary of what a "Strawman" is: A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus wi… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/12/16 06:30 AM |
| 1 | Is masculinity fragile?<sup>Hi!</sup> <sup>Here's</sup> <sup>a</sup> <sup>summary</sup> <sup>of</sup> <sup>what</sup> <sup>a</sup> <sup>"Strawman"</sup> <sup>is:</sup> ^<sup>A</sup> ^<sup>straw</sup> ^<sup>man</sup> ^<sup>is</sup> ^<sup>logical</sup> ^<sup>fallacy</sup> ^<sup>that</sup> ^<sup>occurs</sup> ^<sup>when</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>debater</sup> ^<sup>intentionally</sup> ^<sup>misrepresents</sup> ^<sup>their</sup> ^<sup>opponent's</sup> ^<sup>argument</sup> ^<sup>as</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>weaker</sup> ^<s… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/12/16 03:22 AM |
| 2 | My Sister: An Inadvertent Red PillerHi! Here's a summary of what a "Strawman" is: A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus wi… | /r/TheRedPill | 29/12/16 01:29 AM |
| 2 | What do you think is the long term solution to the sexual marketplace?Hi! Here's a summary of what an "Ad Hominem" is: Argumentum ad hominem (from the Latin, "to the person") is an informal logical fallacy that occurs when someone attempts to refute an argument by attacking the source making it rather than the argument itself. The fallacy is a subset of the genetic fallacy as it attacks the source of the argument, which is irrelevant to to the truth or falsity of the argument. An ad hominem should not be confused with an insult, which attacks the person but does n… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/12/16 12:57 AM |
| 4 | CMV: Redpillers do not understand women. They still think of them as men.Hi! Here's a summary of what a "Strawman" is: A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus wi… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/12/16 11:12 PM |
| 1 | I have a pit bullHi! Here's a summary of what an "Ad Hominem" is: Argumentum ad hominem (from the Latin, "to the person") is an informal logical fallacy that occurs when someone attempts to refute an argument by attacking the source making it rather than the argument itself. The fallacy is a subset of the genetic fallacy as it attacks the source of the argument, which is irrelevant to to the truth or falsity of the argument. An ad hominem should not be confused with an insult, which attacks the person but does n… | /r/TheRedPill | 28/12/16 09:21 PM |
| 2 | Presentation Matters / discussion<sup>Hi!</sup> <sup>Here's</sup> <sup>a</sup> <sup>summary</sup> <sup>of</sup> <sup>what</sup> <sup>a</sup> <sup>"Strawman"</sup> <sup>is:</sup> ^<sup>A</sup> ^<sup>straw</sup> ^<sup>man</sup> ^<sup>is</sup> ^<sup>logical</sup> ^<sup>fallacy</sup> ^<sup>that</sup> ^<sup>occurs</sup> ^<sup>when</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>debater</sup> ^<sup>intentionally</sup> ^<sup>misrepresents</sup> ^<sup>their</sup> ^<sup>opponent's</sup> ^<sup>argument</sup> ^<sup>as</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>weaker</sup> ^<s… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/12/16 03:09 PM |
| 15 | BBC admits its viral “women write better code” story was fake newsHi! Here's a summary of what a "Gish Gallop" is: The Gish Gallop is the fallacious debate tactic of drowning your opponent in a flood of individually-weak arguments in order to prevent rebuttal of the whole argument collection without great effort. The Gish Gallop is a belt-fed version of the on the spot fallacy, as it's unreasonable for anyone to have a well-composed answer immediately available to every argument present in the Gallop. The Gish Gallop is named after creationist Duane Gish, who … | /r/MensRights | 28/12/16 02:53 PM |
| 1 | Feminist Mother Rejects Infant Son Because of His Gender: Feminists don't hate men, they hate boys they give birth to.Hi! Here's a summary of what a "Strawman" is: A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus wi… | /r/MensRights | 28/12/16 02:46 PM |
| 1 | If female hypergamy and pickiness is normal, "fair", and shouldn't be shammed, men reacting with anger and misogyny is also completely normal, "fair", and shouldn't be shammed.Hi! Here's a summary of what a "Strawman" is: A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus wi… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/12/16 02:42 PM |
| 1 | An interesting form of rape apologeticsHi! Here's a summary of what a "Strawman" is: A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus wi… | /r/MensRights | 28/12/16 04:05 AM |
| 1 | "Men value love, women love value."<sup>Hi!</sup> <sup>Here's</sup> <sup>a</sup> <sup>summary</sup> <sup>of</sup> <sup>what</sup> <sup>a</sup> <sup>"Strawman"</sup> <sup>is:</sup> ^<sup>A</sup> ^<sup>straw</sup> ^<sup>man</sup> ^<sup>is</sup> ^<sup>logical</sup> ^<sup>fallacy</sup> ^<sup>that</sup> ^<sup>occurs</sup> ^<sup>when</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>debater</sup> ^<sup>intentionally</sup> ^<sup>misrepresents</sup> ^<sup>their</sup> ^<sup>opponent's</sup> ^<sup>argument</sup> ^<sup>as</sup> ^<sup>a</sup> ^<sup>weaker</sup> ^<s… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/12/16 04:06 AM |
| 0 | CMV: Women are complain about men valuing looks the most in women are unattractive themselvesHi! Here's a summary of what a "Strawman" is: <sup>A</sup> <sup>straw man</sup> <sup>is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater</sup> <sup>intentionally misrepresents</sup> <sup>(their</sup> opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] maki… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/12/16 07:37 PM |
| 2 | CMV: Women are complain about men valuing looks the most in women are unattractive themselvesHi! Here's a summary of what a "Strawman" is: A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus wi… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/12/16 06:45 PM |
| 3 | How's this for a pussy feminist Cuck?Hi! Here's a summary of what an "Ad Hominem" is: Argumentum ad hominem (from the Latin, "to the person") is an informal logical fallacy that occurs when someone attempts to refute an argument by attacking the source making it rather than the argument itself. The fallacy is a subset of the genetic fallacy as it attacks the source of the argument, which is irrelevant to to the truth or falsity of the argument. An ad hominem should not be confused with an insult, which attacks the person but does n… | /r/MensRights | 19/12/16 04:54 PM |
| 3 | How's this for a pussy feminist Cuck?Hi! Here's a summary of what an "Ad Hominem" is: Argumentum ad hominem (from the Latin, "to the person") is an informal logical fallacy that occurs when someone attempts to refute an argument by attacking the source making it rather than the argument itself. The fallacy is a subset of the genetic fallacy as it attacks the source of the argument, which is irrelevant to to the truth or falsity of the argument. An ad hominem should not be confused with an insult, which attacks the person but does n… | /r/MensRights | 19/12/16 04:01 PM |
| 1 | "Men value love, women love value."Hi! Here's a summary of what a "Strawman" is: A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus wi… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/12/16 02:50 PM |
| -1 | How to get banned from r/FeminismHi! Here's a summary of what a "Strawman" is: <sup>A</sup> <sup>straw man</sup> <sup>is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater</sup> <sup>intentionally misrepresents</sup> <sup>(their</sup> opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] maki… | /r/MensRights | 19/12/16 03:05 AM |
| 0 | How to get banned from r/FeminismHi! Here's a summary of what a "Strawman" is: <sup>A</sup> <sup>straw man</sup> <sup>is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater</sup> <sup>intentionally misrepresents</sup> <sup>(their</sup> opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] maki… | /r/MensRights | 19/12/16 02:48 AM |
| 1 | How to get banned from r/FeminismHi! Here's a summary of what a "Strawman" is: <sup>A</sup> <sup>straw man</sup> <sup>is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater</sup> <sup>intentionally misrepresents</sup> <sup>(their</sup> opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] maki… | /r/MensRights | 19/12/16 02:15 AM |
| 1 | How to get banned from r/FeminismHi! Here's a summary of what a "Strawman" is: <sup>A</sup> <sup>straw man</sup> <sup>is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater</sup> <sup>intentionally misrepresents</sup> <sup>(their</sup> opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] maki… | /r/MensRights | 19/12/16 01:48 AM |
| 1 | How to get banned from r/FeminismHi! Here's a summary of what a "Strawman" is: <sup>A</sup> <sup>straw man</sup> <sup>is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater</sup> <sup>intentionally misrepresents</sup> <sup>(their</sup> opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] maki… | /r/MensRights | 19/12/16 01:39 AM |
| 0 | How to get banned from r/FeminismHi! Here's a summary of what a "Strawman" is: <sup>A</sup> <sup>straw man</sup> <sup>is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater</sup> <sup>intentionally misrepresents</sup> <sup>(their</sup> opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] maki… | /r/MensRights | 19/12/16 01:15 AM |
| 1 | "Shock" testosterone therapy reverses prostate cancer in a new studyHi! Here's a summary of what an "Ad Hominem" is: Argumentum ad hominem (from the Latin, "to the person") is an informal logical fallacy that occurs when someone attempts to refute an argument by attacking the source making it rather than the argument itself. The fallacy is a subset of the genetic fallacy as it attacks the source of the argument, which is irrelevant to to the truth or falsity of the argument. An ad hominem should not be confused with an insult, which attacks the person but does n… | /r/TheRedPill | 18/12/16 11:35 PM |
| 10 | How to get banned from r/FeminismHi! Here's a summary of what an "Ad Hominem" is: <sup>Argumentum ad hominem</sup> <sup>(from the Latin, "to the person"</sup><sup>)</sup> <sup>is an informal logical fallacy that occurs when someone attempts to refute an argument by attacking the source making it rather than the argument itself. The fallacy is a subset of the </sup><sup>genetic fallacy</sup><sup>(</sup> as it attacks the source of the argument, which is irrelevant to to the truth or falsity of the argument. An ad hominem should … | /r/MensRights | 18/12/16 10:18 PM |
| 3 | How to get banned from r/FeminismHi! Here's a summary of what a "Strawman" is: <sup>A</sup> <sup>straw man</sup> <sup>is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater</sup> <sup>intentionally misrepresents</sup> <sup>(their</sup> opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] maki… | /r/MensRights | 18/12/16 10:06 PM |
| 13 | How to get banned from r/FeminismHi! Here's a summary of what a "Strawman" is: <sup>A</sup> <sup>straw man</sup> <sup>is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater</sup> <sup>intentionally misrepresents</sup> <sup>(their</sup> opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] maki… | /r/MensRights | 18/12/16 10:03 PM |
| 6 | How to get banned from r/FeminismHi! Here's a summary of what a "Strawman" is: <sup>A</sup> <sup>straw man</sup> <sup>is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater</sup> <sup>intentionally misrepresents</sup> <sup>(their</sup> opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] maki… | /r/MensRights | 18/12/16 10:00 PM |
| 22 | How to get banned from r/FeminismHi! Here's a summary of what a "Strawman" is: A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus wi… | /r/MensRights | 18/12/16 09:57 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter