TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

FamiliarCarrot3603 Archive

View 0 posts and 27 comments by FamiliarCarrot3603 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

same source as the OP, an anecdote.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 03:23 AM
–

It seems clear from this that many women are self-excluding from the dating market source? women are not "self-excluding from the dating market", they are in a string of situationships with top men, while the top men have a roster/rotation of women. see Andrew Huberman for an example: https://www.the-independent.com/life-style/dr-andrew-huberman-girlfriend-podcast-cheating-b2522631.html In the stunning series of allegations, one woman, whom the publication calls Sarah, says she was in a relation…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 02:49 AM
9

so basically, redpill is wrong and bl*ckpill is correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/25 03:16 PM
6

When I am weaker than you, I ask you for freedom because that is according to your principles; when I am stronger than you, I take away your freedom because that is according to my principles. modern females
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/25 02:21 PM
1

(5/10) and below so then who will the sub-6 women be having sex with, if not sub-6 men?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 09:45 PM
2

The arguments you make against sexual socialism can also be made against economic socialism. The counter arguments are also the same. How exactly is that freedom for the individual Liberalism is not leftism.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 03:37 PM
2

Refusing to support enforced monogamy ("enforced monogamy" does not mean "forcing people to have sex/marry") is right wing. Enforcing monogamy is socializing the sexual market, by preventing chads from monopolizing access to females.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 03:08 PM
9

exactly. everyone gets old and ugly eventually. at least women all get to be attractive for some amount of time. ugly men go their whole lives never once being attractive to anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 11:21 AM
7

a "pure" woman is going to struggle? lol. A serious women isn't going to struggle, but if by "serious" you mean "I'M DONE WITH THE GAMES AND CASUAL SEX, I'M SERIOUS NOW" then maybe, but that's really just #2. entirely her choice. entirely her choice, and could change anytime she wants. no she won't, unless by "delusional" you mean "very high standards". if she's so hideously ugly, maybe she should stop chasing average men, and find a nice ugly guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 11:15 AM
6

The reason is because leftists are far right when it comes to the dating market. They hate talking about it because if you argue long enough, you'll get them to admit that fact. "The stronger must dominate and not mate with the weaker, which would signify the sacrifice of its own higher nature. Only the born weakling can look upon this principle as cruel" - Leftists
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 10:56 AM
5

He's not endorsing that attitude, he's just stating a fact. I'm one of those ugly loser males and i agree with him, that really is just how humans operate. This is why enforced monogamy only came after violent revolutions, because society has no problem with loser men rotting away at the bottom of the hierarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 10:54 AM
16

Search for "Apex fallacy". Women are spending all day staring at the CEOs, professional athletes, famous musicians, etc. So when they hear you talk about "men's problems" they think you're talking about those high-status men.
/r/MensRights14/03/25 02:01 PM
13

Contributing to a society that doesn't allow them to have a wife or children? You're just telling men to be slaves.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 09:03 AM
–

"Femcel" discovers the solution to the male loneliness epidemic: Lonely men just need to stop hooking up with tons of random women, and instead pick one woman and settle down with them. <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 08:39 PM
2

The guy i replied to already answered your question. People believe false things to make themselves feel better. Whether those beliefs are technically considered "religious" or not is really just pointless semantics, because in either case the underlying aspect of human nature that fuels the desire to hold those false beliefs is the same. Not interested in writing an article to explain the problem, but i'll just highlight this part of your comment that i think you should spend time thinking abou…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 04:34 PM
6

Good comment but you really shouldn't waste your time. These types just want to feel like they're a genius because they don't believe in religion. Pure NPC brain.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 10:45 PM
–

*hot strangers
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 12:57 AM
–

He didn't say that money/status doesn't matter, he's saying that practically speaking, money/status doesn't matter relative to the importance of physical attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 07:20 PM
1

The problem is that females don't want commitment until their value starts rapidly falling off a cliff in their late 20s to early 30s. Your strategy works if you're a hot guy, but not if you're average or below. The best strategy for average/below-average men is to pretend to be a betabux for these near-wall or post-wall females. Continue having sex with them while pretending to be interested in commitment. Do this with as many females as you can so you have backups, because the female will inev…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 10:00 PM
1

Well "lifestyle" and "betabux" are quite vague in this context, but regardless that's simply not possible at a population level. For every 100 women that are born there are 105 men born, and the number of men is greater than the number of women until the age of 40. On this basis alone your claim is an impossibility at a population level, and it gets even worse when you take single mothers into account (most single parents are single mothers, single fathers are a minority). Then you take into acc…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 08:59 PM
-1

When people say chad vs non-chad what they really mean is "women chase men above their own level of attractiveness". So 9/10 women chase 10/10 men, 8/10 women chase 9+/10 men, 5/10 women chase 6+/10 men, etc etc. As an average man your only choice is to go for below average women, and as a below average man...... well i don't want to get a Reddit Cares so i won't say anything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 08:39 PM
23

People want to feel like they have control over their lives. Ugly men want to believe that they can do something to make themselves attractive, because the alternative is to accept that you will live either a life of complete loneliness, or a life of loveless, emotionless, attractionless relationships with older women who you're also not attracted to, and who daydream about the hotter guys they fucked when they were younger. Attractive men want to believe they did some thing to earn the adoratio…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 08:34 PM
1

You don't really need to spend a ton of time and energy dating though. Just do a bit of swiping on the apps during downtime throughout your day. As for your second sentence, notice that you say "unemployed" whereas in your original post you also said "underemployed" and "be able to buy lavish gifts". I agree that you should focus on being employed before spending too much time trying to date, but there is a massive difference between "be employed" which is what you just said in this comment, and…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 12:51 AM
1

That is an argument for men having stable employment, but it's not an argument for men avoiding sex/dating while un/underemployed. Saying "stable employment will improve your dating success" is very different from "you should completely avoid dating/sex unless you have stable employment".
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 12:45 AM
2

It's very telling that you keep latching onto the "rich" aspect of my criticism, which as i said previously is completely irrelevant: That's completely irrelevant to the point being made. Go ahead and mentally replace "rich" with "not unemployed or underemployed". You still have yet to make an argument as to why men should avoid dating/sex while they are un/underemployed.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 12:41 AM
1

That's completely irrelevant to the point being made. Go ahead and mentally replace "rich" with "not unemployed or underemployed". The fact remains that you still haven't made any argument as to why men should avoid dating/sex while they are un/underemployed. Also, you did imply rich with this sentence: Men should not be trying to attract women until they have a stable career in place and can, with little damage to their economic vitality, take women on expensive dates with ease and buy girlfrie…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 12:33 AM
0

You're not actually making any arguments. You ask the question, and then you just say "no they shouldn't, men should not date unless they are rich". You never provided an actual argument as to why men should purposefully avoid having sex unless they are rich. There is nothing stopping a man from dating and having sex without being rich. As a matter of fact, the vast majority of men date and have sex without being rich.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 12:27 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter