TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

FamousLeague9729 Archive

View 0 posts and 175 comments by FamousLeague9729 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Maybe if they are tall, lean, and masculine, sure. Otherwise a net negative as it signifies poor genetics
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 02:37 AM
1

woman on purplepilldebate try to stay to the main point and not dissect into nonsensical ramblings challenge
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 02:26 AM
1

Just wanted to spin one more time around and tell you to date someone your own age too if you're younger. If you date an older man you will very likely be manipulated emotionally, physically, and sexually. It would almost be guaranteed.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 02:10 AM
1

Men overestimating their own intelligence doesn't make them less intelligent than woman. Even if there is a bias for a man to overestimate himself, peer reviewed research shows that they are less emotional, have larger brain mass, and have higher IQ's on average. Just because hubris is involved doesn't make this objectively untrue. Try again
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 01:59 AM
0

Promiscuity, drug use, partying, no principles, 2+2=4, not sure why I have to explain this, and all these things lead to higher rates of infidelity in peer reviewed research in committed and married couples.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 01:47 AM
1

Then list your own, refute and debate like a normal person instead of saying words that don't account to anything. You disagree with what I posted, great. Now what? Prove your point. Lmfao
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 01:45 AM
1

lmaooo, wouldn't doubt it
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 01:15 AM
1

Me or her brodie?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 01:11 AM
1

Not a big fan of arguing within fact and reason in other threads either, lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 01:08 AM
0

Yeah, narcissism and DT traits involve lying and manipulating, just because they put a mask on doesn't detract from those traits being attractive. Try again, name the goal posts I shifted please.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 12:59 AM
0

That doesn't disprove that women want to sleep with them en mass, like I have said multiple times. You're incapable of thinking in nuance or any semblance of layered thought, try again later.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 12:55 AM
1

First study -( mostly women) perceived medium levels of the three traits as the most attractive STR - Lmao, proves my point attractiveness of the DT using only vignettes or supposedly filled in questionnaires with no images attached to the fictitious persons. This means participants most likely used their imagination to picture the physical appearance of each fictitious person. - When engaging in fantasy women prefer DT features the most in sexual contexts 2nd Study - Reinforces my argument too,…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 12:41 AM
1

I pointed you to the thread title, try reading the post again, it's literally within 2 clicks of this one on the same page. Shut the fuck up lmfao, holy crash out.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 12:37 AM
1

Yeah I've literally posted 100's of studies at this point in this thread and the other one with vagueities and women, not reposting them for some guy that doesn't know how to debate in good faith properly. I didn't make a fallacy btw, you responded with one.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 12:22 AM
1

Your point was to utilize a fallacy and not argue a single point academically? Great job
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 12:19 AM
0

You're right, they all do, is that your argument? Your opinion?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 12:06 AM
0

The one study you posted I admitted refuted my 1 Amazon crime study, the weakest one. You haven't refuted all the other ones. Post a study or shut up.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 12:04 AM
0

Post a study, bye.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 12:02 AM
1

Fallacy
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 12:01 AM
2

Not entertaining this again
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 11:59 PM
1

Still waiting, lmk when you have something of substance to actually argue/debate
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 11:58 PM
2

I know you how you argue now and I am not falling for the bait, post academic articles by scholarly institutions refuting objective data, or don't talk to me. Just because you think something has the narrative of a man-o-sphere lense doesn't discredit anything I posted or make it untrue by any identifiable metric. Keep following me around this sub like a weirdo.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 11:54 PM
1

You posted one study that refutes the weakest one I posted, your paragraph of opinion and copy paste of manosphere blogs doesn't discredit the other 4 articles peer reviewed research.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 11:51 PM
2

There is also studies showing personality is linked to a lot of genetics too, at the end of the day you can use ideas from this sub and research as a guide. But do what you want to do, if you want to party and have fun, do it. If you want to work towards long term marriage goals then do that. You're your own god on this earth, just make sure you try to be happy and fulfilled.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 11:43 PM
0

Okay, and statistically you're both way more likely to cheat on each other, it's just objective science lol. Not saying it's going to happen but that's a stat I'd like to avoid with my partner
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 11:34 PM
1

Yeah you can't look into the future, even if it doesn't bode well in the long term, you will be infinitely happier than sleeping around either way and keeping promiscuity low. Re-marrying a 2nd man will be a lot easier than marrying the first one after collecting 20 nights with different people. Just do your best
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 11:33 PM
2

In a large forensic hospital, 39% of psychopathic patients had a consensual sexual relationship with female staff members (Gacono et al., 1995) https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-clinical-investigation-of-malingering-and-in-Gacono-Meloy/64715853ae276ac9d25c2b145cd6e3ed62843916?p2df If you’re smart, don’t drink much, stay out of fights, display a friendly personality, and have no criminal history – then you are most at risk of being miserable and alone. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/193507…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 11:31 PM
-1

It's a foundation-less pill that doesn't hold any weight in values. Ah yeah my wife fucked 15 dudes before me, ah yeah I did heroin at a club once and got sucked off by a dude unprotected. You'll think this is me slut shaming or being homophobic, but it's judging those reckless decisions at face value, someone that engages in gross degenerate behavior, by all accounts and research, is very likely to continue to do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 11:27 PM
-5

Yeah, blue pill is pretty vanilla and overly accepting of a lot of non sense so I am not surprised, it's the easiest and laziest pill to take.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 11:24 PM
0

Getting with your life partner at the youngest age possible to build growth, but viciously vetting them for shared values. My advice would to never get with a man that has indulged in pornography in anyway, and you're off to a great start just with that. Lustful men are incapable of loyalty. Make sure they grew up in healthy conditions, and obviously, be very physically attracted to him as this is very important for longevity, don't settle on someone because they have a "great personality" it ne…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 11:23 PM
-1

We are a vain species, it would hinder attraction yes, liking someone for their looks is the least superficial thing on earth btw. Before invented speech, you would literally just size up your partner with your eyes and find them suitable or not, all the man made stuff is actually more superficial than liking someone for the way they look, beauty doesn't typically fade as much as people claim if you're bone development isn't poor, eat well, and take care of yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 11:21 PM
-6

Blue pilled and terrible take, the blue pill takes shouldn't even be allowed to post tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 11:19 PM
1

You're wrong, I have countless studies proving that women are more attracted to narcissistic, manipulative, and criminal oriented men. More than happy to post if you disagree. Stop just saying things you don't know, it's irresponsible.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 11:18 PM
3

No they should remain celibate until they find their life partner. Promiscuity is in fact a good predictor of infidelity. Indeed, promiscuity among females accounted for almost twice as much variance in infidelity (r2 = .45) as it did for males (r2 = .25) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513802001496?via%3Dihub Women with 16 or more sexual partners prior to marriage have an 80% rate of subsequent divorce. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.0044…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 11:16 PM
-1

She should ideally have no sexual encounters
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 11:05 PM
2

Women only shit test men they aren't completely attracted to, just take the black pill, you're so close.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 11:00 PM
1

Peer reviewed accredited studies =/- resentful male echo chambers, it's a cheap out to discount facts that you don't want to comprehend challenging your world views, it's a really childish stance, putting horse blinders on purposefully.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 10:58 PM
1

No it wasn't, it was me pointing out your fallacy, it wasn't intended to be one. Refute with academic research or don't participate in a debatory discussion lmao. Even with your one liner, the burden of proof for refuting my claims is still on you, this isn't a turn based game.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 10:56 PM
1

Not an argument
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 10:54 PM
1

Don't need to be a scientist to read research papers written by scientists, are you saying they don't count or their results don't have validity because I am the one reading it, not publishing it? Makes no sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 10:54 PM
1

Not an argument, or a rebuttal to peer reviewed studies I've posted, rattling off each other in an echo chamber doesn't accomplish anything or reinforce your point in any meaningful way. It just fuels cognitive dissonance tendencies within yourself. Explain how the science I posted is wrong or rudimentary. Post your own to support your side.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 10:53 PM
1

Already posted studies
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 10:49 PM
2

I can also agree with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 10:31 PM
0

It should be taught to women at a very young age imo, before an experience is taught for them
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 10:28 PM
0

In the future if a man ever invites you over one on one, assume its sexually charged, because 9/10 times it usually is. For your own safety
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 10:25 PM
-1

Women are much better at lying and manipulating, stop this nonsense
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 10:20 PM
1

What women say they want =/= what they actually want A husband's depression negatively affected his wife's sexual satisfaction. A wife's depression did not affect her husband's sexual satisfaction. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0092623X.2023.2166637 Study Finds That Men Like Nice Women, But Not the Other Way Around https://www.newsweek.com/study-finds-men-nice-women-not-other-way-around-261269 The Dark Triad personality: Attractiveness to women (Women prefer rude, narcissistic and…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 09:46 PM
1

You are likely in the top 20% of looks, women will usually borderline throw themselves at men they find very attractive, and in a 1 on 1 setting it's guaranteed. Men just don't think it ever happens that way because most men to women are ugly.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 09:27 PM
0

"It's always sex" so you know it's likely going to lead to the man advancing sexually when he invites you one on one, saying you're expecting something else and being disappointed when its a confirmed pattern seems silly, especially if this is repetitive behavior
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 09:26 PM
1

I literally dgaf
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 08:49 PM
0

Concern trolling
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 08:44 PM
–

She's obsessed with me, I stopped replying to her and now she is following my other comment chains trying to get me to respond
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 08:36 PM
–

But true
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 08:35 PM
2

Tried my best
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 08:34 PM
–

You literally are retarded, and proved my point right with your own words, the debate is over and I am more than happy to call you what you are now, a retard 🫵😂
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 08:29 PM
1

The flairs are literally public and most people arguing with me were women. Congrats on being stupid too.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 08:28 PM
1

Deliberate ignorance, I literally have walls of studies posted and refer to them several times with several different people, you're sitting there telling me the color of a green painted wall is red. Acting stupid is not a good look. You are literally copying peoples ad hominem attacks towards me in real time, you know what to look for, I am not going to baby you if you're goal is to look at documented science, when I have it posted en mass all over the thread. Ragebaiting isn't good faith learn…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 08:27 PM
–

Don't get me started. This sub is full of bluepilled women btw. You won't get any real discussion here, I tried for 2 hours in the other thread, with accredited research studies.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 08:23 PM
1

Hops on purplepilldebate to update us, focus on real life you absolute tard
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 08:21 PM
1

I don't have the energy to keep giving you dopamine hits via notification, im sorry bonde
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 08:21 PM
1

The 100's I responded to like 6 different people, are you slow? Coming to this sub has made me literally realize women are children. What the fuck do you mean which ones?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 08:20 PM
1

Ex being transported via EMS and you hop on purplepilldebate, nice one good priorities
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 08:20 PM
1

Ad hominem 🫵😂
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 08:19 PM
1

Yeah that's all the context, women allergic to taking accountability part 50, you're all retarded and this has only proven that women are incapable of layered thought and honest debate. You're all seriously so braindead and this sub is a echo chamber, big time.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 08:17 PM
2

I really don't have the energy to do this for the 6th time, maybe read the replies.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 08:17 PM
1

🫵😂
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 08:16 PM
1

I misunderstood because of your lack of context, not a fault of my own
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 08:16 PM
2

I've explained it probably over a dozen times and engaged with 5+ people for an hour straight, lying isn't conducive to anything, so why do it?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 08:14 PM
0

Be civil said the person arguing in bad faith and spamming emojis 🫵😂
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 08:13 PM
1

Link the studies they are referencing then if that's the case, or don't talk to me, a blog and a news article isn't accredited source of information, sorry.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 08:08 PM
1

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 08:07 PM
0

From the horses mouth, stay retarded. Women always tell on themselves if you let them speak long enough. That made this entire thing worth it btw.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 08:05 PM
1

😂😂😂😂😂 https://preview.redd.it/fthyzxb93qig1.png?width=1312&format=png&auto=webp&s=b04f145c0a1bb6117804fd1da2229a5aef17c546 "You can't prove hypergamy" "AWALT isn't real"
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:58 PM
0

"Hypergamy isn't real" "AWALT isn't real" https://preview.redd.it/fyxrmia03qig1.png?width=1312&format=png&auto=webp&s=cc849310f4bd22f4d313d1f05bb4e07c1eac73c5 Lmaooooooooo
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:56 PM
1

Projecting your own anger on to me, I am completely relaxed since I am knowledgeable about this, that's why I can reply fast with various studies and backed claims, and it takes you 10 minutes to make stuff up, find false studies, and utilize ad hominem attacks. Looking forward to the next one
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:56 PM
1

https://preview.redd.it/s4yszqhz1qig1.png?width=1312&format=png&auto=webp&s=557165af4eae22ee0ef99e6bec2f1c7b11898f68 Literal AWALT Hypergamy btw, LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO HAHAHAHA
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:51 PM
1

Then link the study they are referencing
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:49 PM
0

Ah yeah, honing in one thing and generalizing as the entire argument, refute all the other ones too. Just admit you're out of your depth and are incapable of good faith debate, make claims and link studies supporting them, if you are able.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:47 PM
1

A blog isn't verified accredited research
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:45 PM
1

Not an argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:45 PM
1

But you critiqued me for not reading the whole thing, implying that you did and had more authority on the subject. Holy shit, ahahhahahaa.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:44 PM
1

Yeah when I'm argued with emotion after presenting logic for an hour straight by 5 different retards and liars (you) it's hard to stay objective. Notice how I stayed objective/logical and research based for over an hour while 5 of you were yelling at me, all women too, shocker. Like a little anecdotal study proving that you're all more emotional and non-logic driven, and it took me an hour of being attacked until I stooped to the same level, while you all came out of the gate with that attitude.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:43 PM
1

More studies proving this false x100. In Spain, unattractive men are ~16% less likely married than attractive men, and ~30% less likely married to a partner of higher educational status. No such effects exist for women. http://www.reis.cis.es/REIS/PDF/REIS_159_07_ENGLISH1499424514902.pdf (Martínez-Pastor, 2017) Photoshopping a man into a luxury apartment made women rate him as around 30% more attractive. The same manipulation had no significant effect on men rating women. http://doi.org/10.1556/…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:40 PM
2

The abstract is the summarized findings of the entire study, and you're telling me you bought the article access? Why do you keep making stuff up and lying?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:38 PM
1

Aversion to having the wife earn more than the husband explains 29 percent of the decline in marriage rates over the last thirty years (N = 73,654). https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjv001 (Bertrand 2015) 71% of women with income of more than $95,000 per year vs 14% of men feel it is essential their romantic partner has a steady income. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282931592 (Fales 2016) On a Chinese dating site, women with high income more often visited male profiles with even higher inc…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:36 PM
0

Women prefer high status men and fewer men than women reproduce as a result: In a large population survey, males with much lower income than their wives were 2.27 times as likely not to have sex. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-0968-7 (Kim 2017) Women’s income was correlated with the income that they wanted in an ideal mate (r = .31), his educational (r = .29) and professional status (r = .35), i.e. women with higher income expressed an even stronger preference for high-earning men than did w…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:36 PM
-1

It literally does. Here's more you can pretend isn't real The Economist: Short Guys Finish Last Psychology Today: "Short men have to deal with enormous stigma when it comes to romance." Harvard Bias Test (1700 sample size): "There is a height bias... on the order of things like race or age... The degree of bias is in your face." Research found taller men were more likely to lose their temper. The research was designed to test Short Man Syndrome - or "Napoleon complex." "Taller workers earn on av…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:35 PM
1

It was a 1-2 paragraph abstract, you slow or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:35 PM
1

I read the whole thing, Bonde.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:32 PM
1

??????
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:32 PM
1

Same reply as my other one
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:30 PM
1

It's not generalizing if it's backed up in research, what makes them poorly posted, btw? They are all academic institutions with credible backing.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:29 PM
1

I think if people act deliberately ignorant more then a dozen times I get some leeway for some insults, you're literally all retarded.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:28 PM
2

You linked a study that proved my point, and falsely claimed another was rooted in emotional psychological adolescence growth, when it was an attraction study on boys being attracted to smarter woman or not. What fucking pills are you on?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:28 PM
1

Deliberate overly specific ignorance isn't an argument
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:27 PM
0

They do. It's why women have much higher rates of infidelity.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:25 PM
1

You linked a blog and a college news article, I doubt your capable of finding actual sourcing on the points you're trying to support. Stick to 6th grade debate club
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:25 PM
0

Not an argument and everything I've presented is rooted in verified peer reviewed research, I literally showed you 5 studies backing my claim. Ad hominem doesn't disprove what I said
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:24 PM
1

Yeah and they still choose him, you would to, you aren't different because you're talking on some pseudo debate forum devoid of all debate. You are hypergamous as well
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:24 PM
0

Yes, women all have a single idealized foundational type. Men do not.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:23 PM
0

The only thing I've done is linked research proving multiple things, and you all seem to not accept it. Especially since you invented fantasies and were actively cognitvely dissonancing yourself from it less than 10 minutes ago. Just accept facts.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:22 PM
0

Not true, women have one type, men have many.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:20 PM
0

Women are more prone to anger then men, you linked a blog, and a college news article, btw.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:19 PM
1

I've read and linked every single study at face value without a single made up story, you literally just created fantasies to attach to yours, and you weren't even reading them correctly. The one you just linked previously proved my point further, not yours. Do you get lost when trying to get out of bed in the morning?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:19 PM
0

All right there, try opening your eyes
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:18 PM
-2

You sourced a blog, and a college news article, debate in good faith or don't talk to me
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:16 PM
2

You literally just make stuff up and insert your own narratives into studies you can't even read correctly, please stop talking to me
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:15 PM
1

Debate in good faith or stop talking to me
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:14 PM
0

AWALT is literally true, and woman are much more lookist than men are. When woman say they want someone "confident" they mean a man that's facially attractive and over 6ft, they will never admit this openly since they would lose social currency, a phenomena you see even anonymously online for some reason, as they are sensitive to being judged. Same with "loves himself and expresses it" they just mean someone attractive with some emotionality, attractive being the key part. Physical Attractivenes…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:13 PM
0

Lot of words to say and refute nothing. Studies don't express internal biases as the study itself is rooted in objectivity. You teach 6th grade? Not surprising.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:13 PM
2

*Significant, but very small, gender differences were found overall, with girls showing more positive emotions (g = −.08) and i*nternalizing emotions (e.g., sadness, anxiety, sympathy; g = −.10) than boys Hahahahahaha
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:11 PM
-1

Having an emotional response doesn't mean that someone is lead by their emotions Car accident happens, women go into flight or fight easier, men don't, whos more capable of dealing with the situation? Nor is having an emotional response inherently harmful to a person or make them perform worse. A woman is more likely to have a more potent negative anxiety fueled response to a piano recital she needs to perform in, while the man is less likely to. Who will perform better, given the circumstances?…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:09 PM
2

This study only proves that men are less attracted to smart women, and doesn't support the claim you made in anyway? Did you even read the abstract, this is an attraction based study, not a study regarding stunted psychological development between boys and girls.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:06 PM
-2

Sweeping generalizations and it's reading data sets. Okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:05 PM
-2

None of this disproves brain activity scans in objectively measured clinical settings, sorry. The snarky cheers was a good touch though, further adding to the heightened emotions claim to what should be a completely normal conversation, but worst part of all is that you're a man proving to have a woman's range of emotions. Also a blog isn't a source, nor does it disprove men are more rational overall.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:03 PM
1

Probably because you're on birth control, which inhibits attraction to more masculine men, and you're surrounded by trans people
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:00 PM
-2

Because confident = Tall, Masculine and good looking. When they want someone "emotional" they mean someone that fits the above criteria, with added emotionality. Netflix and Chill depicts meeting up for sex in any cultural setting, especially after midnight. Men are more direct and less fake then women, especially in friendships. Objectively unattractive women are constantly gassed up as being the prettiest, when in reality they are not and women treat them poorly, while the same discrimination …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 06:57 PM
2

Link a study or stop talking
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 06:52 PM
0

Yes. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23342102/ Men and women both state preferences for certain height differences, with women saying what they want in a mate, but then their partners not equating to what they are saying (they were taller then what they stated they "wanted")
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 06:52 PM
1

Whatever you say
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 06:50 PM
0

Probably because you're both in the same looks league, you would leave him if someone tall and attractive that was a noticeable upgrade seriously pursued you.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 06:45 PM
1

All that proves is that men have trained themselves to shut their brains down in response to emotional stimuli from repeated shaming since childhood No, it doesn't? You are quite literally just making up narratives to apply to the data, that's not how that works sorry. You are just applying more emotionality and magical thinking to an objective piece of research, which hilariously enough enforces the research further.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 06:44 PM
0

What you say you want =/= What you end up, which I also proved in peer reviewed research, women are literally incapable of telling the truth
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 06:42 PM
2

Didn't think so, you have no intention of good faith debate or coming in to learn, get lost.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 06:38 PM
-1

If he was Henry Cavil, you'd bend over in a heartbeat, even with his misogynist language
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 06:36 PM
1

I quoted emotional reactivity in the brain, not the brain structure itself. Try again You're also wrong, since womens brains are typically weighted 150g (10-15% smaller) less than mens, making a clear difference in size alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 06:33 PM
0

Ad hominem, some "debate" subreddit, lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 06:31 PM
1

Admit that woman are more emotional then men, just as I admitted that men commit more violent crime and I will indulge you with more backed research.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 06:31 PM
1

Already did, read above.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 06:30 PM
1

Yes men commit more violent crimes then women. See how easy it is to accept facts? Can you admit now that women are more emotional than men since it's been proven?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 06:30 PM
-2

Another 2+2=5 woman, the studies are literally right in front of your eyes. It's objective science, even done with brainscans. You are more emotional than men, simple as. Why does this have to be a bad thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 06:29 PM
1

I have the ability to edit it into what I want because the sub allows it. Try again. Also why are we talking about my flair? Lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 06:28 PM
2

I'm not angry. See how you're turning this very logical based debate into an emotion focused one? Lol, jokes write themselves
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 06:27 PM
-1

It proves what women say doesn't equate to what they want. How many times do I need to hold your hand and explain to you what's clearly right in front of you? Stop replying to me and wasting my time, you asked for studies for two separate issues and I supplied them, directly proving my original points right.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 06:25 PM
1

Retard
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 06:24 PM
0

Women are more likely to attach homosexual tendencies and be turned off by men expressing emotions, then men. This also isn't true
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 06:23 PM
1

Just misdirecting with nonsense, further proving the point further. Try actually debating something. I wouldn't disavow crime statistics since they are data led facts, lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 06:22 PM
2

2+2=4 and you're saying it's 5, I can't say anything you will believe if you have data right in front of you that you are refusing to acknowledge. Proving my point btw too, by rejecting reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 06:17 PM
1

Right, her redefining what he was after I was under the impression of the wrong term makes me misunderstanding. stay brain dead
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 06:17 PM
-2

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23342102/ Men and women both state preferences for certain height differences, with women saying what they want in a mate, but then their partners not equating to what they are saying (they were taller)
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 06:16 PM
-2

Woman are more likely to believe in "magical type thinking" https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0092656620300441 Women express more emotional intensity positively and negatively https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1941513/ Women showed greater physiological reactivity (larger startle reflex modulation and stronger neural potentials) to aversive emotional stimuli than men https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0031938411005221?u Women reported and displayed greater …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 06:11 PM
-4

Yes, it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 06:02 PM
0

The things that turn you "on" have a default floor of attractiveness requirement for them to even be applicable to making you "turned on" in the first place. Women don't date rape men nearly as often because women have a much higher threshold for what they find attractive, due to their biology of carrying a baby for 9 months, which makes them much more specific with their mates. Men on the other hand can impregnate many women and are attracted to a much broader range of women because of this. Be…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 06:01 PM
-8

You are more emotional, and lead by your emotions more than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 05:55 PM
0

In order to ask a question I would of had to ask a question, durrr
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 05:49 PM
-5

Maybe debate the topic instead of downvoting objective, peer reviewed, scientific research. Women must be upset I am putting a spotlight on their psyche
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 05:49 PM
0

because womens sexual desire stems from what I am arguing, and everything else after it is because they were originally physically attracted to what I am pointing out. so this thread is a whole bunch of yap.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 05:45 PM
0

The genders don't differ, if 2 people not attracted to each other hang out, its friendly, if both are attracted to each other, it will in all likelihood turn sexually charged, romantic/or sexual. If 1 is attracted and the other isn't, the one will pursue and get rejected. Or if the person that is attracted knows the other is not attracted, they will suppress it, or try to sneakily instigate things in that direction subconsciously. It's not a men or women thing. Women as a whole are just have a m…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 05:40 PM
-6

Not true
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 05:32 PM
-7

Guys give off enough obvious signals leading up to something like an invite somewhere, or to go get food, and women know that. Men are only interested in hanging out one on one with women when they want to be around them or pursue them sexually, and the only exception is if they aren't attracted to her, in which case a one on one hangout or event leading up to something like that would likely never happen. You're right guys are more subterfuge oriented when trying to obtain sex specifically, but…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 05:30 PM
–

If a guy says netflix and chill at 3 am, and you're purposely not reading an obvious social queue for sex, that's your fault not vice versa, and you're being deliberately ignorant
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 05:25 PM
-30

This is typically true, yes. Women and what they say usually don't add up to what they want in reality, this is documented science
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 05:17 PM
0

I never asked a single question, just pointed out hypocrisy, dipshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 05:08 PM
-10

When woman say they want someone "confident" they mean a man that's facially attractive and over 6ft, they will never admit this openly since they would lose social currency, a phenomena you see even anonymously online for some reason, as they are sensitive to being judged. Same with "loves himself and expresses it" they just mean someone attractive with some emotionality, attractive being the key part. Physical Attractiveness is the Strongest Predictor of Initial Romantic Interest in Both Sexes…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 05:05 PM
1

The top word men are drawn to in online dating is "love." The top thing women look for in a man's bio is 6' https://www.the-independent.com/life-style/love-sex/dating-app-tinder-bio-words-most-right-swipes-music-gym-6-foot-badoo-a8512541.html
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 04:59 PM
0

Tall men have more reproductive success https://www.nature.com/articles/35003107
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 04:56 PM
0

The most attractive men are tall and lean, according to women https://www.newsweek.com/women-men-who-are-tall-and-lean-probably-because-we-still-behave-ancient-747638 Never listen to what a woman says, just what they do
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 04:55 PM
1

Physical Attractiveness is the Strongest Predictor of Initial Romantic Interest in Both Sexes; No Evidence Personality Plays Any Role https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5519305/ https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/per.2087 http://sci-hub.tw/https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2087
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 04:52 PM
0

because you blatantly lie when all the science proves otherwise, you can't be trusted with your words, only actions
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 04:44 PM
1

data shows this isn't true and is a performative take by women
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 04:43 PM
1

calling someone a pet =/= internalizing them and seeing them as pets
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 04:37 PM
0

women say they would date a short king that's funny, but all the data shows they skew towards tall, masculine, stoic men. of course they aren't going to admit these things because social currency exists, and no one wants to come off shallow. you have no clue what you're talking about, and if you're settling for options outside of these data sets you're likely just ugly and forced to settle with the options available to you
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 04:30 PM
0

now hes your ex husband, gotchya
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 04:28 PM
-1

because what women say usually has absolutely no bearing on what they want or what they are attracted to, and this objective fact
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 04:20 PM
1

<image> wow you sure love your husband, in sickness and health am I right, complaining about him getting on the transplant list so he can get better, just lmao, do you also find your terminally ill husband as "less than" as you said verbatim about men in your previous post? do you like to make a habit of sexually manipulating other men and essentially committing emotional infidelity while he is sick at home consistently?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 04:15 PM
-1

of course women looking at male bodies turns them on, they just need a much higher threshold of attractiveness then men need. anytime they say they find someone attractive and aren't turned on, they are being disingenuous. biological imperative cannot be reasoned out of, women find it much harder to get turned on by a man because their standards are naturally much higher, since they carry babies for 9 months, and men can blow a load and get anyone pregnant.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 04:11 PM
1

riveting stuff lillith
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 04:09 PM
1

just because you are capable of empathetic acts doesn't mean they cannot be rooted in narcissism btw, it also doesn't mean you aren't capable of love. your last sentence proves my point, you're batshit insane, multiple husbands and partners? lmao, i can smell you from here
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 04:05 PM
2

nothing to do with gender and more with your inflated sense of feeling powerful over someone you deem less than you, you're also a fake intellectual that applies the logic of "well all men do it, so i'll do it" which makes you reductionist and stupid
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 03:47 PM
1

nonsensical cope, of course men make you feel feminine
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 03:41 PM
4

you're a textbook narcissist btw, on top of being incorrect
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 03:40 PM
-1

objective science disproves this, everything she says only applies if the person shes talking to at baseline is someone she is attracted to. she wouldn't see someone, not find them attractive, then "interact" with them and become attracted.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 03:38 PM
-5

you don't need interaction to become attracted to someone, if you don't find someone attractive when you look at them you aren't attracted to them lmao. even if they turn out "funny" and you suddenly start liking them more, its a temporary form of attraction that doesn't have longevity
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 03:37 PM
1

women are visual, even moreso then men, not less
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 03:35 PM
1

stopped reading after the first sentence btw
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 10:54 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter