| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | Proof of SRS involvement | Fancy_Frogglin | /r/MensRights | 11/10/12 07:37 PM |
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Proof of SRS involvementBy compromising yours. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/12 09:29 AM |
| 1 | Proof of SRS involvementI agree it's very likely. Would just prefer to hold ourselves to better standards of behavior with all this. Also is that a screen shot from the SA forums? | /r/MensRights | 12/10/12 06:03 AM |
| 3 | Proof of SRS involvementBetter but still not proof and could cause more harm than good if wrong. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/12 05:51 AM |
| 2 | Proof of SRS involvementIt shows they people from SRS like what happened... And that's it. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/12 05:47 AM |
| 5 | Proof of SRS involvementI don't think you know what that word means. You're angry at them for wanting to close subreddits so you want to close theirs to teach them about closing subreddits. You're honestly not seeing the disconnect there? | /r/MensRights | 12/10/12 05:46 AM |
| 6 | Proof of SRS involvementIt's prejudicial. It's not like SRS is one person. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/12 05:44 AM |
| 1 | Proof of SRS involvementWell now you're being a hypocrite. | /r/MensRights | 11/10/12 10:38 PM |
| 3 | Proof of SRS involvementThere are a lot of sub reddits that can be downvote brigades. There has been no action by reddit to enforce its own rules Which is one of the complaints SRS has of other sub reddits. You're acting just like them when you're asking to remove it. You can't have it both ways on this issue. It's time this whole issue was taken seriously. I agree if things turn out to be true but jumping to conclusions is counter productive. | /r/MensRights | 11/10/12 09:44 PM |
| 2 | Proof of SRS involvementWhy mention it? | /r/MensRights | 11/10/12 09:38 PM |
| 3 | Proof of SRS involvementIt's not right but it's also not proof. | /r/MensRights | 11/10/12 09:23 PM |
| 4 | Proof of SRS involvementHowever, it seems very likely that SRS members were involved, considering their history and associations. Guilt by association shouldn't be justifiable. There's little doubt that SRS approves of the action, and would do the same itself if it could. Same could be said about people in the middle east cheering after 9/11. It's like attacking Iraq to get Bin Laden. Oh wait. Seriously though. It's a likely scenario but so are a lot of things. I'd really like some proof before we start finger pointing… | /r/MensRights | 11/10/12 09:21 PM |
| 3 | Proof of SRS involvementDoubtful. We don't have any proof and only a reasonable suspicion but, that could be said about a lot of scenarios. However people are going to use this to attack SRS in an ends justify the means way. Which is what SRS does. That's fucking wrong. I wish more people would be a bit objective about this. | /r/MensRights | 11/10/12 09:15 PM |
| 3 | A pre-emptive response to SRSI've been hearing quite a bit about SRS and their doxxing of users Uh, where? In the interest of objectivity I'm legitimately asking. You have news blogs clearly doing but where's the proof of SRS involvement? | /r/MensRights | 11/10/12 09:09 PM |
| 4 | Proof of SRS involvementNot really. "I've been hearing quite a bit about SRS and their doxxing of users, and how /r/MensRights is next." I'm just asking for some proof. :/ | /r/MensRights | 11/10/12 09:06 PM |
| 2 | About being told not to rapewe're being facetious Oh, sorry, the bathroom is right over there. | /r/MensRights | 09/08/12 02:52 AM |
| 1 | About being told not to rapeFigured there was sarcasm but, no, I don't know what Dog Press is. It's a big internet. | /r/MensRights | 08/08/12 07:13 PM |
| 1 | About being told not to rapeNope. | /r/MensRights | 08/08/12 12:28 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter