TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Fangorntook Archive

View 0 posts and 13 comments by Fangorntook on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Or perhaps not everyone who disagrees with you is as stupid as you assume, and “think about it” is not a sufficient defense of your position. Let’s try this: I’m right about everything, and you’re always wrong. While we’re talking, Bill Cosby is a serial rapist and you’re a sniveling little rape apologist who hides like a coward behind a veil of victimhood. Trust me, and if you disagree: just think about it. I trust you find that persuasive?
/r/MensRights04/07/21 04:14 AM
1

Nearly everyone believes this. There’s no serious debate here. An overwhelming majority of self described feminists surely believe this. You’re looking to be victimized and aggrieved if you think otherwise.
/r/MensRights04/07/21 01:05 AM
0

This is about the level of logic and rigor I expected you to respond with.
/r/MensRights04/07/21 12:54 AM
1

“There is a growing belief that many feminists don't care about male victims of rape. So why then should men care about the support for females?” This is a justification for all manner of bigotry. If all you need to justify moral indifference to the suffering of a particular demographic is evidence that some of its members are bad people, you are a bad person. “no man that advocates for mens rights intends to do so by dismissing the devastation felt by women” You may want to check the post this …
/r/MensRights04/07/21 12:46 AM
0

Trivializing rape with unfunny levity will prevent that how, exactly?
/r/MensRights04/07/21 12:40 AM
1

“No evidence”. I’m done talking to this public masturbator, but for anyone still reading I would just like to emphasize that he describes the accusations and/or sworn testimony of 60 women of various forms of sexual misconduct over a period of decades as “no evidence”.
/r/MensRights01/07/21 03:48 AM
1

“You’re a moron”, “little boy” (why the) “need to throw insults”? Do you even read what you type? “So you admit the prosecutor was a crook?” Which prosecutor? Castor? Of course he’s a crook, he was an impeachment lawyer for Trump. “because it seems like a big fucking deal but you dismiss it like it was nothing.” Interesting assertion given that I haven’t mentioned this topic, much less dismissed “it”. Nothing I’ve said about Cosby and the inescapable conclusion that he’s a rapist rests on me hav…
/r/MensRights01/07/21 02:04 AM
2

No, you’ve been wrong about almost literally everything I’ve seen you say. You already confessed your lack of integrity, albeit inadvertently, by claiming to base your argument on the content of articles you did not and would not read. I’m just repeating your own position back to you. If you don’t see a problem with what you said, I’m happy to leave this discussion where it is.
/r/MensRights01/07/21 01:03 AM
1

There’s no evidence he framed anyone, and none of the prosecutorial evidence was fake: merely inadmissible for procedural reasons. When you don’t care about the precise meanings of words, you can convince yourself of anything. Try to be smarter.
/r/MensRights01/07/21 12:35 AM
2

Starting to think this guy is a troll. “The articles don’t say X” “I didn’t read the articles” “You didn’t read the articles either.” “My evidence for (3) is the content of articles that i did not and will not read.” A more intelligent person would be embarrassed to post this.
/r/MensRights01/07/21 12:12 AM
3

It was overturned on a procedural issue, not an evidentiary one, and you clearly don’t understand the distinction, as you keep asking for “secret evidence”.
/r/MensRights30/06/21 11:55 PM
2

He was not “found not guilty”. He was found guilty by a jury, and a higher court overturned the ruling because of a procedural issue. That’s not even close to the same thing. The prosecution didn’t lack evidence. The prosecution convinced a jury of his guilt.
/r/MensRights30/06/21 11:35 PM
-3

“So it’s the schadenfreude that you really resent” Can’t speak for her, but schadenfreude directed at those who have done no one wrong is worthy of condemnation. “But now ask yourself: Whence does that schadenfreude originate? What cultural phenomena inspired it to be so bitter in some guys? I mean, it didn’t always used to be like this, did it? So when did it change and what changed it?” This comment crosses line between navel gazing and autofellatio… There have always been self-pitying manchil…
/r/MensRights30/06/21 06:30 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter