TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

FartAwayYourWorries Archive

View 4 posts and 40 comments by FartAwayYourWorries on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Mothers. Lock up your daughters and sons. If this fails use MyWitness Posted 8 November 2013 Last year during “schoolies” on the Gold Coast a young female died after falling from a high rise balcony. The tragic event caused many to call for the cancellation of schoolies events everywhere. It has however, become a rite of passage for teenagers around Australia, an opportunity to spend fun, relaxing time with school mates they may never see again. The event has grown considerably and is unlikely t…
/r/MensRights09/11/13 03:22 AM
2

I'm going to assume your mother has told you to be careful on numerous occasions growing up, and as an adult. Told you not to do things for your own safety, Eg: Don't walk home alone after dark, call me instead to pick you up. Don't hang around Johnny, he's trouble. Don't leave your laptop in the car where it can be seen. You're just encouraging theft. All you need to do is mention all the times she has told you to change your behaviour to reduce or avoid risks. Then point out by her logic that …
/r/MensRights13/09/12 05:28 AM
1

Her name has been released (see comment above). Maybe some articles were written before she was actually convicted?
/r/MensRights17/06/12 02:01 AM
3

It has been: Stevie Rochelle Bamford, 21. See this article. Even includes a picture of her.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 01:59 AM
1

Here in Australia there are Men's Shed organisations. Not really shelters but they are there to support men.
/r/MensRights23/12/11 04:32 AM
5

Feminists actively went after government funding to build women's shelters, or they raised money other ways. Whinging about it won't build men's shelters. So what have you contributed towards the building of men's shelters?
/r/MensRights22/12/11 09:24 PM
-1

But figures from the WA Department for Child Protection show substantiated cases of child sexual abuse against fathers still far outnumber those against mothers. and while fathers were responsible for 85 per cent of sex abuse cases against children. and In 2005-06, mothers were responsible for 161 neglect, 72 emotional and psychological, 76 physical and three sexual abuse cases against their children. In the same financial year, fathers were responsible for 37 neglect, 41 emotional and psycholog…
/r/MensRights11/12/11 01:03 AM
-2

In Canada, Australia & the US, child sexual abuse is dominated by males. source
/r/MensRights11/12/11 12:24 AM
-2

I can see a link referring to most child abusers being women, but no link referring to most abusers being women.
/r/MensRights04/11/11 08:28 PM
-4

Citation needed. Every assertion requires evidence.
/r/MensRights04/11/11 07:06 PM
6

The article suggests it is the full amount. Personally I have no experience with what is common for child support in Australia. $15 * 26 payments * 9 years = $3510 (similar to the amount mentioned). Maybe she is paying it back at the same rate he was paying her initially?
/r/MensRights08/10/11 03:37 AM
2

I have a bi-polar mum who refused to accept she had a problem, and get treatment. She made our lives growing up a living hell, including dad's. I think that's one of the reasons I come to r/MR. In my twenties my GF had similar behaviour and it turned into a nightmare. Thought I could help her but she used me as an emotional punching bag. So never again. Perhaps if mum sought out treatment I'd have a different perspective. The fact is my ability to help sufferers has been destroyed by other suffe…
/r/MensRights05/10/11 10:29 PM
1

Great article. Individualist feminism has a lot of common ground with MR. Gender feminism scares the living shit out of me.
/r/MensRights02/10/11 10:32 PM
12

I guess that makes women who don't swallow misandrists.
/r/MensRights02/09/11 11:23 PM
1

Agreed.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 05:18 AM
1

Ok, I thought you were asking for an example of a supportive movie about men coming out later in life. I assumed the character in ELP was a lesbian. So what does the double standard have to do with sexuality? EDIT: On second thoughts it seems GeekYoghurt is making the connection, not you.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 05:00 AM
2

Brokeback Mountain? I haven't seen Eat, Love and Pray so I'm not sure how the movies compare.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 04:38 AM
1

Sure, but the only gay person I know who did that was an older man. If you think only lesbians would do that you're being misogynistic.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 04:31 AM
1

Absolutely. I've been part time for years. But then I don't have a partner, kids, or a mortgage. Not sure how viable it would be with any of those in the picture.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 09:52 PM
9

Did you not read the subtitle: No matter how attractive, old or smart a woman is, she can be a victim of abuse. Here are some signs of an abusive partner or spouse. I think it's pretty damn clear to be honest.
/r/MensRights19/08/11 12:42 AM
1

True he was a stranger, but they agreed he would have an ongoing role. Secondly, it's perfectly legal to just list the biological mother and leave the father empty on the birth certificate. Why didn't they do that if he was to never have a legal claim? By adding him, they consented to him being one the child's legal parents. So he bonded with his child with the understanding he was assigned parental rights, and that access to his daughter would never be taken away. He is now at the mercy of the …
/r/MensRights19/08/11 12:11 AM
3

Donating to friends then chances are you'll have an ongoing role in the child's life. This can be minimal (donor), or it can be significant enough that you retain your parental rights. Naturally it should be discussed and agreement reached between all parties on exactly what role you'll have. The point is, an agreement was reached, and years later it was thrown out. Just like the child support cases where donors are forced to pay. Men being forced to pay child support they didn't agree to, and m…
/r/MensRights18/08/11 06:52 AM
2

How did you come to that conclusion?
/r/MensRights18/08/11 02:45 AM
2

The issue is: A father's choice to be a part of the child's life (or not), is being ignored because a mother changes her mind many years after an agreement is made. We've seen men forced onto birth certificates when its suited women, and now we seeing men forced off birth certificates for much the same reason. Imagine you're surrogate/egg donor, who as part of the agreement with a gay couple, would be on the birth certificate and part of the child's life. It's your child but you're giving them t…
/r/MensRights18/08/11 02:21 AM
4

It's a knee jerk reaction that is actually wrong. Female judges are less likely to white knight. I'm sure there's the occasional man hater. If you read the transcript you will see the judge is trying to keep the father in the picture when most judges would of given the mother primary custody due to the site.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 10:05 PM
1

The judge had already determined that it constitutes parental alienation and that the children were aware of the site. Seems the judge is being nice by giving him the chance to take it down before giving her primary custody. And here we are bashing the judge.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 09:58 PM
2

Leaving out names doesn't mean much if you include other identifying facts: ages memorable events family holiday destinations timelines relatives etc If the kids came across it they could easily recognise that it's about them. The description of Mum doesn't need to be accurate for this to happen. More importantly the link had been made by the mother, so regardless, it must be assumed the kids know. I don't believe he was asked to take down the blog prior to this point.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 10:21 AM
15

Devil's Advocate: Isn't the blog a form of Parental Alienation? I think it is his right (free speech) but it's bound to have consequences with custody arrangements. EDIT: The guy offered to take it down as part of a custody arrangement. The judge is simply enforcing his part of the agreement. EDIT2: So instead of giving the mother primary custody (which the judge is well entitled to due to PAS), the judge is actually trying to keep the father in his kid's life and all MRAs can do is bash this ju…
/r/MensRights09/08/11 09:54 PM
0

There will be three stages to the Gender Revolution. We are currently at stage two: Feminism Men's Rights Egalitarianism I think it follows the triad: "thesis-antithesis-synthesis". Egalitarianism will grow as people seek refuge from the constant bickering. Misandry and misogyny will not be allowed. Feminism and Men's Rights will continue to focus on issues affecting only their genders. Misandry and misogyny will continue to thrive in these two movements. TL;DR: We need all three movements.
/r/MensRights04/08/11 12:42 AM
6

A woman may be convicted of infanticide instead of murder if she kills her baby aged less than 12 months while suffering from a mental disturbance which results from giving birth or breast-feeding. Where a woman kills her baby, the prosecution may charge her with the offence of infanticide. If she is convicted of that offence, she is sentenced as if she had been found guilty of manslaughter. Alternatively, the prosecution may charge the woman with murder, in which case infanticide may be raised …
/r/MensRights31/07/11 12:13 AM
3

I can't post on that page. Can you please add the following example for Australia (NSW): Only mothers are eligible for "Infanticide", a lessor charge than murder.
/r/MensRights30/07/11 10:49 PM
1

So based on a few lesbians you think all lesbians are like that? That's the very definition of a stereotype.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 05:11 AM
3

I know a lot of lesbians and they are some of the most anti feminist people I know. This stereotype of them being man haters is unfair and outdated. Personally I believe a good chunk of the misogyny/misandry in this world is due to heteros hating their ex partners. Think beaten wife or divorced dad. Gays don't fall into the trap of projecting that hate onto an entire gender.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 02:37 AM
11

Blanket misogynist comments like this drag MRA into the gutter. No True Scotsman goes both ways.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 12:40 AM
2

His wife looks like John Travolta.
/r/MensRights22/06/11 03:00 AM
1

I can't even begin to describe how worthless she is. & I mean worthless, like a 1MB thumb drive worthless. Sounds like a description to me!
/r/MensRights26/05/11 11:19 PM
3

How are you sure of her innocence?
/r/MensRights24/05/11 06:27 AM
1

I'm betting you're not adopted.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 04:37 PM
4

If, on the other hand, the choice was made FOR them (ie, the other party walked out), then some form of compensation is needed (but in a one time payment only, and only enough to get started again). Didn't you just contradict yourself?
/r/MensRights16/03/11 10:36 PM
0

If you include physical assault as well as rape then it is quite possible: Intimate partner violence is pervasive in U.S. society. Nearly 25 percent of surveyed women and 7.6 percent of surveyed men said they were raped and/or physically assaulted by a current or former spouse, cohabiting partner, or date at some time in their lifetime; Government study
/r/MensRights13/08/10 10:18 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter