TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Fathernomore Archive

View 3 posts and 154 comments by Fathernomore on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
36

False AccusationFathernomore/r/MensRights30/06/18 11:14 PM
30

Marriage/ChildrenFathernomore/r/MensRights25/12/19 11:27 PM
13

Anti-MRMFathernomore/r/MensRights15/03/20 11:49 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Ah, but if both were drunk, who raped whom?
/r/MensRights30/12/25 07:27 AM
5

Don't trust blood relatives either. It is not that all women will lie, it is that all CAN and society has been conditioned to believe them immediately.
/r/MensRights24/11/24 02:40 PM
11

Maybe where you live, that would work. In Atlanta, they have no programs for men. It is against a tenet of their mission of empowering all women and girls.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 07:13 PM
18

You mean like the Partership Against Domestic Violence in Georgia, who on their website, under about us, writes "Today, PADV is the largest nonprofit domestic violence organization in Georgia providing professional, compassionate, and empowering support to battered women and their children in metro Atlanta." No, they give lip service to the concept that men can be abused. But when the rubber meets the road, they fail to support men. 2 shelters in Atlanta with a total of 96 beds, nothing for men …
/r/MensRights29/05/22 07:01 PM
7

Here's the thing: all of us have heard stories of Karen's. So why are we surprised when women who act like Karen's in public are abusive in private. If they will abuse total strangers, they will abuse partners. And as common as Karen's are, then we can guess just how common Amber's are.
/r/MensRights08/05/22 03:14 AM
2

He'll, some get an amber alert when it is their day. PoPo don't care if it is your day, if she says you cannot have the kid, they will straight lock you up for abduction even if you have a copy of the visitation order. Because rule #1, [/sarcasm on]no woman EVER lies.[/sarcasm off].
/r/MensRights03/12/21 05:18 PM
2

Wrong. You do not get to tell me how I identify. You do not get a say at all. Because you do not have autism. You can go now.
/r/MensRights17/04/21 03:27 PM
3

Ah yes, the classic NT trying to tell an autistic that they know nothing about autism. Gosh y'all are pathetic.
/r/MensRights17/04/21 03:01 PM
6

Look up the Autistic Quotient test. Some questions from it: "I find social situations easy." So tell me, how does society treat guys who are shy? Now compare that to the quiet girl. Which is more socially accepted? "I find it hard to make new friends". Look at fairy tales we tell kids. The one who does not have friends and is accepted is the girl: Cinderella, Snow White, Anne of Green Gables. Guys with no friends are losers. "It does not upset me if my daily routine gets disturbed" now you see a…
/r/MensRights17/04/21 02:48 PM
1

Autism is not brain damage. In fact autistics on the whole are more likely to work in STEM than Neurotypicals (NTs). A study by Cambridge U showed a correlation between higher intelligence than the general population. So educate yourself, please.
/r/MensRights17/04/21 02:37 PM
4

I see what you did there 👏👏👏
/r/MensRights17/04/21 11:42 AM
6

More murders happen in the summer. More ice cream is eaten in the summer. Therefore studies suggest eating ice cream causes murder. The logic is flawed. First, they are comparing diagnosed against diagnosed. The fact is more males are diagnosed than females. The reason why is that the diagnosis requirements are biased. Have emotional meltdowns, that is a check. Society does not accept males melting down emotionally. But girls crying is allowed. So males are typically diagnosed before we learn to…
/r/MensRights17/04/21 09:16 AM
10

I am autistic also. It is not a disease, we do not need a cure any more than people who are left handed need to be cured. It is just how we are.
/r/MensRights17/04/21 08:52 AM
8

Turn 18, you are required to sign a sheet of paper which can mean your death. It is called the selective service act and only males are required to sign up in the US. Don't sign up, you broke the law. No student loans, no government jobs, $250k fine, 5 yrs prison, felony record. All of that if possible if you do not sign up. Sign up, draft happens, you could be killed. Women are not required to sign up.
/r/MensRights02/02/21 04:56 AM
7

Trolls gonna troll....
/r/MensRights25/11/20 03:23 PM
2

Cannot. Court order at divorce. Long story in my post history. Short version ex used DCF and police to strong arm a custody agreement and then said she did not want charges after getting the deal she wanted. Can't see or contact until they reach out .
/r/MensRights19/06/20 03:43 PM
3

Just to hear their voices. It has been 3 yr 4 months and 2 days since my daughters last talked to me. And I doubt I will ever hear their voices again.
/r/MensRights19/06/20 01:56 PM
12

Well they were honest, their rules ARE blatant fucking sexism.
/r/MensRights28/05/20 09:55 PM
2

He did not win. He lost. Big time. Lost the children he loved (who no longer talk to him), found out his wife played him the fool throughout the marriage, and gave her $7 mill. He only managed to recoupe $500k. She ended up $6.5 mill, the kids still talk to her, and the baby daddy's life had no repercussions. No, not a win at all.
/r/MensRights12/05/20 09:37 AM
1

I have said it before and I will say it again, the justice system is broken. DA's care more about the win than justice. The law should be changed. If a new trial is granted the court should open with " We are here today to send a person to jail: will it be the defendant or will it be the prosecutor". Any prosecutor who chooses to bring a new trial over recanted testimony or confessions by others (rather than asking the courts to free the prisoner) should have to face a penalty for wasting court …
/r/MensRights12/05/20 09:06 AM
1

It wasn't a post. It was my phone doing it in a pocket and I never knew it. And first offence a permanent ban? WtF!
/r/MensRights16/03/20 09:46 AM
3

Who said landlord. Hold my beer iss another subreddit
/r/MensRights16/03/20 12:44 AM
1

Because?
/r/MensRights10/03/20 07:10 PM
5

Well, to start with, the right to an education without signing your body over to the government (selective service). Women can get student aid without signing up. Not only can men not, it is actually a crime for them NOT to sign up for selective service.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 07:07 PM
1

One gor each virgin he will get when his jihad is done.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 09:38 PM
1

And in other news, water is wet.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 05:58 AM
1

No. The convictuons tell a different story. One where 44% are NOT convicted. That means not enough evidence. Yet their lives are shattered, their bank accounts gone, over allegations. Nothing else. And guess what: they are victims too. We will have to agree to disagree because I think protecting those victims is vital. They are driven to suicide becase of the devistation it causes. They are bankrupted for a crime they did not commit. And when found not guilty, the state does not repay their lega…
/r/MensRights18/02/20 09:34 PM
1

She was off birth control and did not tell you? Take a page from the feminist handbook and file a complaint of rape against her. If the baby is yours, you will still be liable for child support but at least you can make her life just a little bit of hell.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 03:44 PM
1

Ahh, but there is the rub: how is that statistic determined? I can tell you the statistic is NOT how many are accused but not convicted. It is NOT how many are reported to police but no conviction ensues. It is not even how many are charged with the crime but not convcted. Nor is it how many are tried but not convicted. No, the 2% is a snapshot of the REPORTS of rape versus the amounts oftried but not convicted of rape. It ASSUMES all reports are truthful EXCEPT those that do not result in convi…
/r/MensRights17/02/20 10:12 AM
4

Fucked up. Seriously, you are encouraging the equivalent of #me too. This is just a gossip page where people's lives are going to be ruined based on rumor and grudges.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 07:22 PM
2

Concerned? Of course I am concerned. I am concerned about murder too. But I would still rather a murderer go free than an innocent man be sentenced for a crime he did not commit. It is INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty for a reason. To espouse convicting the innocent to ensure the guilty go punished is not justice.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 01:20 AM
9

Size is irrelevant. Mine choked my will to live. "If you leave, you will never see the kids again". "I will ruin your life if you ever leave" . "Nobody will believe you, I am just a little woman and you are this big man". Huh, guess she was right on that one, you certainly espouse her ideals. Go back to r/feminism
/r/MensRights12/02/20 07:55 AM
3

The overly tired "it is only 2-10%" that is false reporting. Let's think of that for a minute. If I laid 2 revolvers on a table with 1 bullet in it, would you be willing to pick one up and play russian roullette? If I were to have a deck of cards, Ace through 10, and told you to pick one with the caveat that should you pull the ace that you lose everything you own, would you pull the card? We would not accept a failure rate of 10% on brakes of a vehicle, we would worry if 9 out of 10 people havi…
/r/MensRights12/02/20 07:51 AM
4

We tolerate women abusing us, we will tolerate that too. I would not have stayed with my abusive wife as long as I did if I had any other option available to me.
/r/MensRights12/02/20 07:15 AM
1

Whatever. You obviously are either purposefully being dense or to ashamed to admit you have no knowledge. May want to give both the masters and the Bach back. Lets break it down: equity means a fair starting point. Imagine two people, Jeff and Jill both get hired as chocate tea pot sculptors. It is equitable for them both, having the same position and amount of time at the company to be paid the same salary. Would you agree? That is equitable. But if Jeff works 20 hrs a week and Jill works 70 hr…
/r/MensRights05/02/20 04:48 PM
1

No little child, feminism says feminism is not about equality but rather equity. Equality says everyone at the table gets the same amount of food. Equity realizes a 2 year old eats less than a 20 yr old. So feminism says it is OK for women to have special rights. And so they argue against shelters for men, the argue against suicide prevention that focuses on men because those things are not "fair" to women. All while arguing for DBE's for women owned businesses and special treatment for women in…
/r/MensRights05/02/20 02:18 AM
1

Please. Millenial 7th grade is not "big school"
/r/MensRights05/02/20 01:53 AM
1

You proved my point: Read the first 5 words of Oxford again. Advocacy. Read dictionary.com again "doctrine advocating ...rights of women...". As for Wikipedia, well propaganda edited by feminists. Here is the thing: if you believe the sexes are equal then you are advocating human rights, not men or women's rights. As soon as you advocate either, you are sexist and do not believe the sexes are equal.
/r/MensRights05/02/20 12:37 AM
2

So have you stopped beating your wife? Your first definition is a fallacy. Women equal to men is egalitarianism, not feminism. You are clearly on dictionary training wheels. Pick up a book.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 09:54 PM
-3

First, your questioning is faulty. You have asked the equivalent of "Are you still beating your wife?" Any answer justifies the question. A better way of writing your question in such a way as to not poison the discussion would be: "To start our discussion, and so we both have a clear understanding, can you tell me what your definition of feminism is? " Second, no sooner do you get a question and then, immediately discount the answer and launch in to an ad hominem attack of online feminists.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 08:35 AM
23

Whoever wrote that shit has NO CLUE what some women will do. Using kids as a weapon is a real thing.
/r/MensRights28/01/20 01:22 AM
3

Old story. Judge said unconstitutional but made no order to change it. So no different than affirming the act.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 10:26 AM
3

An act made famous forever courtesy of the boomtown rats.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 12:43 PM
3

Dorothy Dutiel Sunghee Kwon Amy Bishop Teah Wimberly Latina Williams Elizabeth Bush Jillian Robbins Laurie Dann Brenda Spencer Nasim Aghdam Tasheen Malij Jennifer San Marco All have two things in common: one is they were shooters. Can you guess the second?
/r/MensRights28/12/19 12:42 PM
1

No. Someone thinks you do soooo much to set back mens rights. We are about equality but you want to talk about how some are more equal than others. No better than a fucking feminist.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 10:39 PM
3

I welcome you.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 09:40 PM
1

He is not a "women who think they are men", he is a man. Period.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 09:40 PM
-4

No. You know what they say about opinions. Yours is certain proof, it smells of ass.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 09:38 PM
4

Ask your friend to substitute "man" with a race or nationality of her choice. Does it make it racist? Then it is anti man not anti race
/r/MensRights03/12/19 11:26 PM
5

Women are held to a higher standard? Right. Gotta stop you right there, Skippy. Women recieve on average 63% shorter sentences for crimes as men do. Women are TWICE as likely to avoid incarceration as men are. Women are more likely to be awarded primary custody in divorce. Women are not required to sign up for selective service in order to get college funding. Women are to be believed and the guy must prove innocence of any sexual accusation, and as a side note if it is found she lied nobody wan…
/r/MensRights03/12/19 09:38 AM
9

Men do not experience remorse or generosity or mental trauma. Seriously WTF?!?!?!
/r/MensRights02/12/19 06:03 PM
1

How exactly will this lesson the rate of suicide in males? How will it lower the rate of mortality from on the job injuries? Or the percent of military deaths in the line of duty that are males? In what way will it provide homeless shelters for men who are victims of abuse? In what strange reality will any of those suggestions correct the uneven sentencing between men and women who commit the same crime? Waiting eagerly for the answer.
/r/MensRights16/11/19 01:40 AM
1

Cancer.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 11:31 AM
12

No charges. As for why the judge is not fixing this at her expense? Because it is not possible to fix it. She has so fucked the relationship between children and father that it is irreconcilable. It sucks but that is what happens when a narcissist or psychopath is a parent. They utterly destroy the relationship of the kids with the other parent. They see "love" as a prize and a zero sum game. If little Jimmy loves you, there is that much less love for me and I want all the love. And Jimmy, in th…
/r/MensRights23/10/19 08:39 PM
2

So.... post something other than a complaint about the sub.. surely you have something new to post. Like how you got the common bathroom at work changed back to the mens bathroom?
/r/MensRights17/10/19 09:20 AM
0

Well for starters, with the state your right to visitation is separate from your obligation to pay. Here he will not allow visitation without money trading hands. His child be damned. The child is nothing more than a product. If that does not concern you then our discussion is over.
/r/MensRights13/10/19 09:52 PM
2

This guy is more than an ass. He is pimping his child for God's sake. I mean seriously, he is selling his kid by the hour. One of the few times that I hope a guy loses custody.
/r/MensRights13/10/19 07:50 AM
6

Well.... yeah.... I mean it would just be wierd the brother and judge hugging a dead body and the bailiff walking up to a dead body to comb her hair.... In all seriousness, I get what you are saying, and she did get off light. She was a ho?w invader who drew and shot an unarmed man. She was under charged and should have gotten max sentence. She was distracted by something, maybe it was the sexting but maybe something else. I mean the apartment had a door mat and hers did not. Kind of a big clue …
/r/MensRights05/10/19 06:10 AM
1

Wow, A-A-Ron. I know that in your 14 years of life, you have learned so much, but you just amazed me! I should not be surprised, after all your whole life has been indoctrination,; but still, just wow. The amount of hubris that you have, at 14 yrs old, to actually try to actually try to peddle the lie that "Feminism was never about the superiority of women" and think that I would just say "Gee, thanks A-A-Ron for showing me how wrong I have been". To not even comprehend that words have meaning? …
/r/MensRights30/09/19 07:59 AM
8

No doubt a part of a settlement with the student.
/r/MensRights28/09/19 10:12 AM
1

Exactly my point. People do not believe false accusations happen, and even if they happen it is rare. But the truth is far more sinister, they happen a lot. And they leave men - and women- in a wreck. We need things like innocent project to be the PR that false accusations and false convictions do happen.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 09:42 PM
2

But you will still go bankrupt defending yourself. And do not be so certain they will not convict. In America a sex crime nowadays is guilty until proven innocent. You cannot prove a negative.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 06:54 PM
1

That really won't stop it. If someone wants to make an accusation, they will make it. They will simply say this one time you did not so that.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 05:24 PM
1

Oh puh-lease! Stop putting words in my mouth, never sId I was not familiar. As you claim to be so familiar, then you should KNOW they lie. Why one of their charts is titled "out of every 1000 sexual assaults, 995 perpetrators will walk free". It states only 230 will be reported, blah blah, blah. Let that title sink in. No reported assault can be false, no unreported assault can be false. They do not accept the possibility that ANY case may be anything other than a perpetrator. That is just one e…
/r/MensRights16/09/19 11:55 AM
3

I have done the math using the RAINN . First they lie when they claim their numbers are from Govt statistics. They claim out of 1000 assaults, 230 are reported. But statistics claims 40.4% are reported. So that puts, extrapolating from their 230, a total of 570 "incidents". Of those 230 reports only 46 get arrested. If those, only 9 are prosecuted, of those 5 are found guilty. The other 4 are adjudicated "not guilty". As in they are legally determined NOT to be guilty of the crime. Now let's be …
/r/MensRights15/09/19 11:01 PM
0

No. It is not about equality. You are not comprehending that. Egalitarianism is about equality. Feminism is about FEMALE hence the name! It espouses advantages for women, not a level playing field. If you cannot even see that, well then it is a waste of time takking to you because you have imbibed the kool aid.
/r/MensRights15/09/19 02:36 AM
10

The manure is strong with this one!
/r/MensRights14/09/19 02:58 PM
3

Nor it it the norm. And boy do women pitch a fit when THEY have to pay the prostitution fee.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 01:05 PM
16

Femi Ismail isn't about equal rights; feminism is about superior rights for women. Feminism is for excluding males from domestic violence shelters funding. Feminism is for unequal ridesharing in divorces involving children. Feminism is pro-alimony which is boggling if they truly feel women are equal to men. Alimony is basically institutionalized prostitution (you are paying money because the woman had sex with you). No, feminism is not about equality. It is about one group being better than anot…
/r/MensRights14/09/19 09:36 AM
1

Not a hero. Not at all.
/r/MensRights13/09/19 05:49 PM
5

Well, she is an admitted TERF, so we Lready know she is an ass....
/r/MensRights11/09/19 01:13 AM
1

Gillette told us "F you" so, no. I left to Harry's. Gillette can get bent.
/r/MensRights24/08/19 07:51 AM
4

While I would not be surprised by that, I am talking strictly from statistical reporting. I would expect male injuries from physical abuse are under reported due to feminine toxicity which ridicules males for being abused, something they would NEVER do to a female victim of physical abuse.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 12:04 PM
22

Domestic violence is not primarily toward women. 48.8% of men have been victims of emotional abuse versus 48m4% of women. You read that right, more men are emotionally abused than are women. While it is true that women are more likely to be physically abused than men are, domestic abuse is both physical and emotional. By blaming masculinity for his death, she is victim blaming. Would she be so quick to blame a woman for getting raped? Of course not. He was mentally I'll, and because WOMEN mock g…
/r/MensRights19/08/19 09:09 AM
2

Not going to happen. No judge is going to allow a 10 yr old to testify in open court. She would get the 10 yr old blocked. Easy peasy.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 12:04 AM
2

Temporary restraining order
/r/MensRights18/08/19 05:10 PM
8

You are abused. Physically and emotionally. She exhibits all the traits. And she has gas lighted you that you can not afford it. Your soon to be ex is a lawyer. Lawyers make money. It will be SHE paying YOU alimony. And her getting your daughter is NOT a foregone conclusion. Time to start documenting. Obviously she is not going to consent to you recording her. Or is she? For the sake of your property, you want a security camera system in the Apt which records to a DVR. So what if it catches vide…
/r/MensRights18/08/19 11:06 AM
8

Huh. They must have honest judges where you are from, not biased former lawyers who automatically side with the lawyer they are friends with.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 07:45 PM
29

I would be BEYOND thrilled if my ex did that. I would gladly by my girls new clothes, I would gladly pay out of pocket to get the physical done. Just to have one day with them.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 09:28 AM
10

Some troll woke up on the wrong side of the bridge...
/r/MensRights13/08/19 08:53 PM
0

No, actually a true 50/50 should be the only instance child support should NOT be granted. Seriously, you will only provide for your children if they spend time with you?!?! They are not possessions and only providing for them if you get to spend time with them, well there is a name for purchase time spent with people: prostitution. We will have to agree to disagree and frankly after reading what you wrote, I need a shower because sick.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 01:32 PM
1

So they know the model is biased and say "use it anyway". Can we get any clearer a "fuck you" from them? They are ENABLERS of the abusers, not advocates of the victims.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 09:54 AM
3

To be fair, you both had correct points. If the man had custody, the woman SHOULD pay child support. And she was right, if you were not together, then child support should NOT be a question; you both created the life, you both need to pay to raise it to the point of self sufficiency. Children should not have to suffer because their parents could not keep it in their pants.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 09:25 AM
1

Goodbye. Auf wiedersehen. Hasta Manana. Au Revior. Don't let the door hit ya where the good lord split ya. Bye, Felicia.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 11:40 PM
1

Is gauche to post on a subreddit by shitting on it and asking people to join yours instead. Makes you look like a whiny piece of shit who got his feelings hurt.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 09:16 PM
3

Or it could just be that you come across as a whiny cry baby who needs his safe space because those mean old mensrights guys won't kiss your ass and tell you it smells like roses!
/r/MensRights15/07/19 09:06 PM
0

Not surprised a liberal doesn't like trump. Harvey's Weinstein has not been convicted of anything, but why let that fact get in the way of politics. Left wing is anti Male anything, the only right they will agree to is mens right to shut the hell up. Just wow. Children cannot consent. What kind of sicko thinks sex with kids should be legal?! Companies are not government. Only a liberal would equate the two because a liberal thinks government owns everything, including people.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 05:58 PM
1

Please do not ban. Never feed the troll.
/r/MensRights10/06/19 05:25 PM
1

Try reading the first post again. I stated she should have been asked where she got doc from. She was not the person under the gag order. The person under the gag order committed contempt. That most likely is her husband. His ass should have been locked up. If she knew of the gag order, the second question that I stated needed to be asked, then she could be in violation by posting sealed document. I did not state unequivocally, sorry big word that means without any doubt, that she was guilty of …
/r/MensRights09/05/19 09:16 AM
1

Oh, and appeals court did not agree. Appeals court ruled that the judge should have recused and did not. So the sentence was overturned not on it not being contempt but on procedure. A new judge will rule on contempt and she may yet find herself back in jail.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 06:05 PM
1

No insider information needed. HER SPOUSE was ordered not to share, he gave to her, she posted. How do you explain how she got it?
/r/MensRights08/05/19 06:03 PM
1

It was not "simply posting". She knew the documents she posted on Facebook had been sealed. And she ignored that and posted them. Should that have garnered her contempt, no. Instead she should have been brought in to court and questioned where she got the documents, was she aware they were sealed, and asked why she posted what she knew was a sealed document. Depending on those answers, then maybe she would get a contempt. As soon as she said the docs came from hubby, he should have been brought …
/r/MensRights08/05/19 09:50 AM
34

Notice how she admits the truth that men are unfairly treated in court then throws it all aside as irrelevant. Her own son was falsely accused yet she is still a full on "#believe her" person. There truly is no helping people.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 08:39 AM
1

Ah, but are you not doing the calling out based on your view of the sex of the people? And is that difference in how you interact based on the sex of those involved not also a bias based on sex, also known as sexist behavior? So if truly want to not be sexist, shouldn't you treat the situation as if both are the same sex?
/r/MensRights22/04/19 02:45 AM
4

Um, no. I think he is correct. It is sexist for a man to hold a door for a woman. A basic civility. Therefore, as we are not to be civil and help women, we should not get involved. Cannot have cake and eat it too. When we white knight and they do not want it, we are sexist pigs. OK, then no white knighting at all. I rule them out because are you gonna step between two dudes about to fight? No? Then if you are stepping between a guy and a woman, then you are doing so because of sex and are sexist…
/r/MensRights22/04/19 02:41 AM
8

"Nowhere near as bad as the holocaust"?!?! Really?!?! What is one of the MAJOR planks of feminism? "My body, my choice". There have been over 46 MILLION abortions since becoming legal, compare that to the holocaust which had 6 million killed. But let's not stop there, let's look at other tenets of modern feminism. "Believe her". A movement rooted in a position that is so far removed from justice that it actually inverts our legal principal of innocent until proven guilty. No, it seeks to destroy…
/r/MensRights27/03/19 08:30 AM
12

I found it more interesting that the National Center for Domestic and Sexual Violence does not seem to recognize woman on man violence. The sad thing is my exwife did at least one of every category. Every. Single. One. But according to the Duluth model (tm) I was not abused because I am male.
/r/MensRights20/03/19 07:11 PM
3

Please do not feed the trolls.
/r/MensRights20/03/19 07:02 PM
1

If I was going to do it, they wouldnt be hidden.
/r/MensRights19/03/19 11:59 AM
2

I would agree with your list, but would reverse the order.
/r/MensRights19/03/19 11:57 AM
1

Not if you look at the evidence of the case. They were not crossing at a protected crossing, it was after sunset and electronics do nt appear to have been involved. That she was charged at all was purely political (only charged after families of dead sued city for no crosswalk / 3 way stop sign at intersection.
/r/MensRights15/03/19 07:19 AM
5

More to the point, notice how the article implies only women are the recipients of domestic abuse. Not one "expert" spoke about the 1:4 males who are victims of domestic abuse.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 09:59 AM
1

No. Not outside bags the bag your purchase is in.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 10:20 PM
57

Don't hold your breath. "Every day is men's day" Can hear the cries now. Sexism is fine, as long as you are female. Racism is fine, as long as you are against the appropriate race. Religious discrimination is perfectly fine, as long as you dislike the approved religions. Get with the program because the masters demand loyalty. If not, you too may get a subpoena from Adam Schiff.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 09:05 AM
2

Been in a bank recently? Walk in wearing a ball cap and sunglasses, get told to remove them. Are you "acting in a way that is suspicious"? Just by wearing a ball cap? Just by wearing sunglasses? No. But because SOME will wear those to hide their features, ALL are treated like criminals. Bought anything from Walmart lately? Been asked for your receipt going out the door? Is leaving a store with items in a bag suspicious? But because SOME will shoplift, ALL are treated with suspicion and treated l…
/r/MensRights08/03/19 08:51 AM
5

What he stated was not the same as equating all women to being psychopaths. I lived 21 years with a female psychopath. His statement was so far from the shit she did. Remember, not EVERY woman is going to falsely accuse you, but EVERY woman has the potential to do so. And therein lies the rub: deciding who to allow past the gates. Because any woman COULD make a false claim and society AUTOMATICALLY believes women so you are guilty until proven innocent.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 08:36 AM
8

Judge threw it out. http://www.mayalaw.com/2016/05/31/plaintiffs-lack-
/r/MensRights11/11/18 10:18 PM
1

But she cited fear of flying for why she could not come testify yet had no issue with it for vacations. She claimed not to even want to be in the room with Kav 30+ yrs later but was friendly to Mark Judge just a few weeks after. There were only 5 other people at the party but she cannot remember which of the five brought her? Was it the guy whose name she does not remember? Just seems very suspicious. Just like how she went upstairs to the bathroom in a house she supposedly had never been in bef…
/r/MensRights04/10/18 03:32 AM
1

Holes in her testimony? You mean besides her being afraid to fly but flying for vacations? You mean how she doesn't remember if she showed the wapo complete notes or just markups? You mean like not knowing how she got home back in the days before everyone had a cell phone to call a ride? You mean like her close friend not checking up on her the next day when they were the only 2 girls at the party? You mean like how she said hi to Mark Judge at Safeway a few weeks later yet claimed both boys had…
/r/MensRights04/10/18 02:41 AM
1

And plug in the one last week about the guy who killed his kids and wife and his the bodies at work and you will see lots more stories of men killing kids. That is called anecdotal evidence. OP on the other hand made an across the board statement using a statistic and has since tried to rewrite definitions to "prove" his statistic correct. Isn't this the same shit that we complain of the feminists doing? We cannot win the war of thought by writing unproven lies like the other side does. Then we …
/r/MensRights23/09/18 03:45 PM
-4

From first link: " Studies suggest that male caretakers (fathers or mothers’ intimate partners), often acting impulsively, are the perpetrators of the majority of infant homicides.[9]" Huh, sounds like they did state more men than women.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 05:02 PM
2

Typical liberal asshats who care less about finding the truth and more about stopping Trump.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 02:34 PM
-30

Actually, the first cited article stated that males are more likely to kill. Sorry.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 02:02 PM
1

Well, she is in academia and that is how the kangaroo title IX tribunals do it!
/r/MensRights22/09/18 06:06 AM
1

They did their work. Any crime long since passed the statute of limitations. No crime to investigate.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 05:45 AM
5

My big problem with their statistics is the assumption that just because a person has not gotten a conviction overturned then they must have done the crime. But when the case is a he said/ she said, there is no way to get an overturned verdict absent a confession by the "victim" that she lied. So they remove all the unproven allegations from the false to lower that percent but keep all the current prisoners who are there with no corroborating evidence to show there is no problem but even if ther…
/r/MensRights22/09/18 05:25 AM
15

""We usually always find the truth, but it's rare to find someone lying about these types of crimes," Bailey said. " Don't seem too darned rare.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 05:04 AM
1

Credible witness, huh? She said summer. Girl said it was all over school next week. She said never told anyone. Girl said all over school. The mental gymnastics are from you. Noticed you did not deny that you acted less than civilized.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 12:24 AM
1

So by you definition, you were accused of stalking because you were not acting like a civilized person?! LOL. You are so far up feminism's ass that you cannot see that in today's world, women will use feminist privilege to destroy any many who opposes their viewpoint or stands in there way with a simple "#metoo". And any man who does not see that as a real threat is doomed. The holes keep adding up. Like the classmate who said it happened and was the talk of the school.....except supposedly it w…
/r/MensRights20/09/18 06:55 PM
2

Bullshit posted from an asshat who has never been on the recieving end of a false accusation. As Olivia O'Brien says in her song "trust issues": " A good girl is worth millions of bitches but one bitch will leave you in millions of stitches". Or as Karen Straughan put it "it's not that every woman would do it, it is that every woman COULD do it". If you are not conscience of the possibility that you COULD be accused at any time, you are a fool. As for the "evidence" of this claim. We are suppose…
/r/MensRights19/09/18 07:02 PM
2

About time. And the judge needs to shutter the SSS program. The government ALREADY KNOWS WHERE WE LIVE!!!! They do not need the SSI to find any of us. They are now technologically obsolete.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 12:31 AM
6

Trick question. No man has ever been told he has done a good thing by a feminist.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 08:08 AM
0

But what have you done lately? If you want to complain but are not active, you are as guilty. You allowed it to become what it is.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 06:51 PM
1

I tried to find some examples of strong support posts without politician bashing on your list of posts. Alas, all I found was sports
/r/MensRights23/08/18 03:57 PM
7

And just think, it only cost him $50k bail, who know how much in legal bills, lost advertising revenue, hit to his reputation. All of which he will never get back He is just lucky that he had big enough pockets or he would have been prosecuted.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 07:10 AM
5

"I dont feel like I'm tone policing..." "I'm really trying to change the tone..." Make up your damned mind! "...to the aggression constantly exerted by men to women." Umm, yeah, got a go with "you can fuck right off with that". You want to whine about how aggressive men are, go over to r/feminism
/r/MensRights16/08/18 07:02 AM
12

Translation: she has no evidence.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 07:51 AM
-2

No, what she wrote is every bit as bad as Trump saying that he could grab a woman by the.... Both are equally wrong. That "ever." Was placed there on purpose. And it is trying very hard to ignore it that is in bad faith because if some man, say a famous millionaire who ran a TV show and ran for president said EXACTLY what she said, would you say that reading it as forcing sex on others?
/r/MensRights15/08/18 07:43 AM
8

If you believed the judge was going to take your kids away and your soon to be ex offered you a chance, at least on paper, to see them 1 day a week, would you go to court where you believe the judge will give you nothing or would you take the scrap the ex is offering? So your statistic is about as relevant as stating that eating ice cream causes murder because ice cream sales go up in summer and so do murder rates. The amount of custody cases going before a judge does not mean that the custody i…
/r/MensRights13/08/18 11:03 AM
-10

I agree. I wish that Trump had chosen her for supreme court. She is a moderate, her rulings are based on rule of law rather than what she wishes the law said. She is trusted by Americans across the political spectrum. And most importantly, all the anti-Trumpers who complain no matter what would have a meltdown that he chose a TV judge.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 08:17 AM
1

PRECUT. As in all you do is glue together. As for too fun or too comfortable. Seriously WTF? I have never met patients in my multiple stays (besides people trying to get a psych ride out of the navy) who wanted to be there. We all wanted out. We all begged the docs to release us. We all promised not to hurt ourselves, just please let me go. So no, I dont think you are going to have to worry about patients treating it like club med.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 02:34 AM
5

But that is part of the problem. Instead of trying to find an adaptive method of doing woodworking (precut kits, snap lock models, something- anything- that involves the use of our hands to build something where we feel we accomplished something), we are given coloring books and puzzles and journaling assignments that just does not really reach us. We are held in this ward where what little bit of "self" that we had not already lost down the rabbithole is stripped away from us. This from someone…
/r/MensRights12/08/18 05:22 PM
2

Utter bullshit. Notice how it repeatedly portrays Dad as hands off.
/r/MensRights12/08/18 02:05 AM
2

Whatever, troll. Makeup bullshit arguments that have nothing similar to real life. Item 1, if person who took the car was a tow truck operator and it was parked in a posted no parking zone, it ain't stealing a car. From your horribly convoluted argument any guy who does not ask after each thrust "do I have permission for another thrust?" Is guilty of rape. Bullshit. Only a deranged person would say mid act, if she did not tell him that she changed her mind that he was guilty off rape because he …
/r/MensRights09/08/18 06:19 PM
2

No, he is comparing "women (Human beings who have feelings, constitutional rights and protections)" to car owners "(Human beings who have feelings, constitutional rights and protections)" who are cheesed their hookie got jacked.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 03:43 PM
1

I kind of liked the ending. Had that whole Animal House "Germans bombed pearl harbor" feel that just made me want to start screaming "he's a dead man", cut a car into a float, dress like a pirate and one day be a senator.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 07:03 AM
10

HBB got hosed. Judge ignored all the evidence and said F U to them
/r/MensRights05/08/18 12:31 AM
2

And I would say that it is OK to let go. Depends on the age of the child. Eventually they reach the age that they share responsibility for the lack of contact. And when they reach that age, for your own sanity, you need to be able to wash your hands of them. Otherwise the guilt of feeling that it is your fault that you do not see them will consume you.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 08:45 AM
2

Look at Henry Cavill. He said what many men are currently feeling. And boy was the backlash swift and harsh. No, men do not get justice. If they did, those making false accusations would be utterly destroyed like the accused men. It is men who get shrugged away. Guy gets raped, many will not even acknowledge it as rape. They laugh about it.
/r/MensRights01/08/18 07:27 AM
2

Ok, but what about when the other party tells you they want out of the contract and then thinks you should continue to pay for services not rendered?
/r/MGTOW30/07/18 09:54 PM
5

Judge should have IMMEDIATELY revisited his ruling and awarded primary to Dad as her but was going to jail for battery of a law enforcement officer. Shows that she was an unfit parent.
/r/MensRights22/07/18 09:47 AM
1

No, not always. I am an egalitarian. I have(had) 3 daughters. Do I think they can work in my majority old, white guy industry. Absolutely. Do i think they live in a society that is gynocentric and lies calling "female privilege" as "male privilege" in an effort to further hinder men and empower women? Absolutely.
/r/MensRights22/07/18 09:33 AM
-1

No. But we can spell. And we know how to respect YOU enough not to come in your house and insult you.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 07:58 PM
2

You dont even need to look that far back. Florida= teenager;Va Tech= 23 yr old Asian, youtube= vegan, animal rights activist, feminist female of middle eastern descent; Ft Hood= middle eastern descent.... I could go on but there really is no point. Only recent shooter that I can think of off my head of recent who meets their definition of old white guy is the Vegas dude. Statistically us old white dudes are least likely to pull the trigger, IMHO.
/r/MensRights18/07/18 01:36 PM
7

If you live in Florida, child support is by spreadsheet. If payment would go up by more than $50, the other part may make a modification motion. Of greater concern is who will have primary residency? The future spouse's of non custodial parent income cannot be cited in a child support petition as a reason to change. Spouse of custodial CAN have income included in alimonies
/r/MensRights17/07/18 04:45 PM
5

You have defined all of a religion by the actions of some, lumping them in a group. Yet you see defining all of another group by the actions of a few as a red herring. Your being an atheist or a Buddhist or a flying spaghettiist makes no difference to the inference. To prejudge a member of a group without knowing them is bigotry. Webster's defines a bigot as "one who regards or treats the members of a group (such as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance". You have admitted that y…
/r/MensRights15/07/18 01:35 PM
7

By your "logic" all Christian's are murderers. The Popes enforced the crusades. By your "logic" all Americans are evil as at one time slavery was legal and even today there is racism in America where people can be attacked just for being such and such race. And by your "logic" all men are rapists because some men rape. Or is it possible that some men are not rapists? Is it possible that a group as a whole should not be defined by the actions of the few. Put your bigotry aside and see people as p…
/r/MensRights15/07/18 12:14 PM
1

I am not saying that he should not have been honest with you; I am saying that telling a young kid (and you said you were playing with toys when she banged the guy from church -what a month before?- so I am presuming you were not even a teen yet) that mom is leaving "us" to sleep around is way too much overshare. First, she was leaving him, not you. The wording puts you in the middle. Second, you did not need to know mom was hooking up, that was "shared" by him not to inform you but to say you t…
/r/MGTOW15/07/18 11:57 AM
1

Ok. Know this is older, but I have to say that neither of your parents acted honorably. Mum betrayed Dad and she did it more or less in front of you. But Dad shared WAY to much to a kid who was still playing. It is a fine line between being truthful to you and protecting you. IMHO, dad crossed that line and his telling you Mum was leaving for a guy was toward the end of child abuse if you were as young as the post about troy's seems to indicate
/r/MGTOW15/07/18 10:04 AM
3

If you were to confront them (and to me that is a very big IF as they have proven themselves to be OK with lying to you and setting you up and ok with publically ridiculing you and humiliating you), do not do it alone. Bring witnesses so they cannot claim that you assaulted them. As for how to confront them: have them reverse the situation. Have them think how THEY would feel if YOU had hosted a party, planned with some guy there to get her drunk, then you filmed her being groped and you sent it…
/r/MensRights15/07/18 09:21 AM
34

He was murdered in INDIA. For the "crime" of giving kids chocalate. His religion is irrelevant to it. A person was killed for talking to kids while male.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 09:08 AM
2

OK, let me take a different tact here. First from USA, so there may be a difference in the legal system. As it works here, the time to introduce evidence is the trial. Everything on that pen drive, I presume, was available at the time of the proceedings. As to her wanting you to change churches, did you? That message and your changing would have been good evidence to bring up at trial. So then trial ends and a verdict is made. In your case, "guilty". Here you have a right to appeal. But there ar…
/r/MensRights10/07/18 06:58 AM
2

3 girls. 1 in 20's, 2 teens. I see no reason to seek a relationship with them. They are just like their mother
/r/MensRights01/07/18 04:27 PM
3

In a way, it would be nice. My oldest actually acted as a spy for her during the divorce. She said she wanted to live at my apartment (she was 18) because her relationship with her mom was too toxic. Turned out she was copying my legal docs and sending them to her mother. And she admitted it when she moved out a month after the divorce was finalized. So, no, I do not hold out hope my other 2 teenage daughters will see what has happened. I was the parent with the unconditional love. My ex loved t…
/r/MensRights01/07/18 10:42 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter