TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Fauropitotto Archive

View 3 posts and 154 comments by Fauropitotto on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

I'm all for it as long as those questions contribute to the conversation rather than from a place of abject laziness. For example, if someone asked a question for clarity after a google search. This could stimulate a discussion or a debate on the topic.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/06/20 04:00 PM
0

Oh I get it, you've got nothing. So far, you've presented nothing that works in the real world. No actual ideas.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 12:39 PM
1

if you don't alow them to abuse their power they can't. How do you prevent an officer from abusing their power?
/r/MensRights02/08/12 02:12 AM
1

Oh, you've thought long and hard, and got nothing. Got it.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 01:17 AM
1

Maybe at least edit your comment so you don't look quite as much of a massive hypocrite. Just a tip :) No thanks. My approach has been that there's nothing we can do to change it. That's never changed. I've been downvoted by people that say that I'm wrong, like yourself, so my response to them is a challenge to provide potential ways to solve the problem. Thus far, the only answer I've received is for me to "change my attitude". Nobody's provided any real solutions. At all. People like you have …
/r/MensRights01/08/12 08:47 PM
0

how are you suposed to resists? start by not DEFENDING THEM!!! Okay, and then what? What's next in your plan for change?
/r/MensRights01/08/12 07:28 PM
1

Again, everyone so far has been responding to my attitude rather than responding with real world solutions to this problem. Scenario: you're watching your daughter at a playground by yourself, but someone calls the police about a suspected pedo creeping people out at a playground. You get accosted by police, your daughter questioned repeatedly, and you're asked to leave. What are you going to do about it? Really, what would you do? Most importantly, how would your actions benefit you, your child…
/r/MensRights01/08/12 06:54 PM
1

yes let's see the cops charge hundreds if not thousands of people. They already do. Most crime stats list convictions not arrests, and nobody really collects national stats on police stops or detentions. the law does not hold any more power than we give them if need be it is our duty to raise up against these enforcements. Bullshit. It is the few that give power to the few. You're writing this as if you can actually "rise up" against these enforcements. How do you plan on "rising up"? What exact…
/r/MensRights01/08/12 06:49 PM
1

I was simply saying that in the real world, "he looks dangerous" IS enough for police to stop someone. It happens every day in thousands of cities in this country. It's wrong, but there's nothing we can do to change it.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 06:05 PM
0

That's it? That's your answer? "Call them out on their bullshit"? is not going to do anything other than make you seem antagonistic. Do that with the wrong cop, and it will be absolutely nothing for them to just lay on false charges on you. See, in threads like this, everyone is brave. Everyone says for you to stand up for yourself. In the face of law enforcement, we are all powerless. One accusation from them, and we're wrapped up in thousands of dollars in legal costs, just to clear our name. …
/r/MensRights01/08/12 12:17 PM
1

You know, people keep saying versions of your sentiment there, but nobody has actually addressed my questions or provided solutions to these problems. Not a single one. So you have a spine huh? What are you going to do if a cop plants evidence? Or if a cop and his buddy begin to beat the shit out of you, then claim that you attacked them first? Or what if a cop sees you at a playground just sitting there and demands that you leave?
/r/MensRights01/08/12 12:11 PM
1

Why shouldn't I? Do you really expect me to just duck my head in shame for expressing my opinion even if it's an unpopular one?
/r/MensRights01/08/12 12:07 PM
-9

That's all it is, my opinion. Based on what I see in the news and the history, it doesn't matter what my opinion is when it comes to how police assert their power on the population....especially black males. Even if I were to carry a video camera running with me 24/7 when I'm out in public, that wouldn't prevent an officer with malevolent intent from getting me tangled in a legal system that will take many tens of thousands of dollars of my money (or more that I don't have), months of appeals, a…
/r/MensRights01/08/12 03:08 AM
-6

So tell me what I can do about it that will make a real difference to my life. I'm all ears.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 02:59 AM
-6

So what can we do about it?
/r/MensRights01/08/12 02:56 AM
-17

All the cops had was the officious, busy body intrusion of people who don't know what the fuck they are talking about. Bullshit. I'm not trying to defend the cop's actions as he carried them out, what I'm saying is that the cops have no possible way of knowing that the report was from an "officious busy body" intruding on a pleasant walk a dad is taking with his daughter. All they have is a report of a possible abduction in progress, and it was their duty to clear the call. They didn't tase the …
/r/MensRights01/08/12 01:24 AM
-43

As far as the police were concerned there was a valid reason: potential abduction in progress.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 01:06 AM
11

For your last part, I've given up trying to help with the technical stuff. I typically feign ignorance about the matter, while some other male falls for it.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 02:44 AM
1

No, I absolutely disagree. Each generation parades around the idea that children are most important, because they represent the future. This idea is wrong. We should focus on the present, and spend our money and energy on fixing what we have now for us. If each generation does what's best for their present, the future will fall in place as a natural product of a good foundation. Children represent an unknown, untapped potential. Which is great. But adults of today represent hard earned knowledge…
/r/MensRights28/07/12 10:23 AM
0

Almost all the major religions place some value (or devalue depending on who you ask) on virgin women that remain that way until marriage. Dowries, veils, and the various marriage rituals revolve around this. It has everything to do with religion because religion has everything to do with societies and their customs. Fuck religion.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 11:22 AM
1

Why not just remove race all together, what purpose does it serve It serves a purposes of recording the stats associated with each demographic. Each demographic tends to follow trends associated with different cultures, values, etc.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 06:56 PM
1

Stop. You're playing at semantics. In common english with ordinary people on this planet in every country, the word American refers exclusively to United States citizens. There is no context in plain english where the word American can be understood to mean anyone born on the north and south american continents and their associated islands. Period. TL;DR - Nobody likes a smartass.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 04:24 PM
1

Sure, Americas, but not America. If I'm born in the caribbean, I cannot call myself an American, and thus, not African-American.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 03:43 PM
4

Precisely why we should just stick to "white, black, hispanic, asian, and other"
/r/MensRights23/05/12 02:43 PM
10

I got frustrated by it because my family is from the caribbean. We became Canadian citizens, then eventually American citizens. When I saw "African American" listed as a race option on government forms and whatnot, it began to bother me. I wasn't African, I wasn't born American, I was just black. Note, they didn't list English-American, Italian-American, German-American, or other heritage based descriptors. It's not right.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 12:04 PM
9

Point was that black people in the US are so far separated from their african ancestors, that the term african-american shouldn't apply to them. Leave african-american for the folks that are first, second, or third generation african immigrants.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 12:02 PM
12

Africa-American man Not trying to pick at you here, but OP said he was a black man. He didn't say he was african american. I'm not quite sure why people find the need to use african american in these situations.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 02:57 AM
2

I think your view needs to be adjusted about false police reports when it comes to women. This guy was in prison for 9 years. He'll be released without any compensation. His life is ruined. NOBODY will touch the daughter out of fear that punishing her will discourage women from coming forward with real crimes. It's not just that she filed a false police report (this is a crime), it's a matter of a woman falsely crying rape (hardly ever punished in the US) and getting away with it like she expect…
/r/MensRights11/05/12 08:13 PM
2

Most courts hold that, if you speak after hearing this notice, you have given implied consent to the recording and cannot later maintain a civil suit. Sounds like a simple, "I'm recording this," would suffice.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 09:20 PM
1

Depends on local law, no? Even if criminal courts prohibit such things, having these records might still work in civil courts or change public opinion if it were to come to this. Otherwise, it's just your word against hers.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 01:23 AM
60

Pro Tip: When you know ahead of time that you're about to get into a physically or emotionally charged situation, set up cameras or an audio recorder to catch any action if it were to occur. You knew she was moving out, you knew it would end up in a shouting match...you didn't know she was going to hit you. If men's rights has taught you anything...be proactive and pre-emptive when it comes to protecting your ass.
/r/MensRights21/04/12 10:51 PM
4

If you care at all about your personal freedom, financial situation, or job prospects, you would take that advice to heart. Helping people is an extreme liability. If you feel you can't sleep at night without it, then help and disappear in the wind before officers have a chance to get on the scene. The moment they have your name, your entire livelihood is at risk. Even for something like CPR, the family can sue you for administering it incorrectly. When it doubt, walk the fuck away. Not your pro…
/r/MensRights20/03/12 04:37 PM
0

Yes. Yes it does. It would be an indisputable waste of time.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 07:47 AM
-4

I say the same thing to women. I'm not sympathetic to emotional weakness in either gender.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 02:56 PM
-8

Men are dead in the mortgue at orders of magnitude more than women because abusive women put them there I stopped reading right there. If another human being has the ability to drive you to suicide, then you've got significantly more things wrong with you than women problems. You spout nothing but absolute bullshit.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 02:33 AM
1

The fact that you're even asking this question indicates that you missed my point entirely.
/r/MensRights25/01/12 08:42 PM
4

I find it hillarious that you use that terminology considering that the definition of a "minor" changes when you cross state and national lines. It was, is, and always will be an arbitrary age set by politicians that have no foundation for setting that age. Why 16? Why 18? Why 21? Where's the magic number? I've met 15 year olds that behave like wise 40 year olds, and I've met 40 year olds that behave like punk 15 year olds. I'm not advocating sexual abuse, or the manipulation or the taking advan…
/r/MensRights25/01/12 03:35 PM
2

I wonder if there are already organizations that do exactly what you're doing right now. I'm wary of free-loaders, simply because I'm one myself. How would one go about demonstrating the need to separate them from those that want to use the service to save them money?
/r/MensRights08/11/11 02:17 AM
2

Your logic is sound. I cannot disagree with it.
/r/MensRights31/10/11 01:33 AM
5

The contract of marriage is to share between two parties. The mind, sometimes the body, and assets. She should hold up her end of the agreement, until the decision is made to break that agreement in a divorce. What's his is his, what's hers is hers. Anything that they purchased together should be split and distributed between the parties. So a woman marries a man who purchased a house. She lives with him for 10 years, and decides to get a divorce. She did not contribute to the purchase of the ho…
/r/MensRights30/10/11 11:03 PM
3

Yes.
/r/MensRights30/10/11 10:29 PM
7

That is an irrelevant "difference". It's recognized as a mental disorder now, but homosexual behavior was also recognized as a mental disorder at some point. Something that many people against homosexuality equated with aggressive/violent pedophilia. Now, I'm not saying that I agree with pedophilia, but think about it. Word swap. Homosexuality is not simply something a person enjoys like a hobby, interest, or sexual fetish. As a group, homosexuals are defined by their exclusive sexual attraction…
/r/MensRights27/10/11 08:05 PM
6

What evidence suggests that there are many more pedophiles who absolutely DO NOT touch kids, and never would? I don't think this is a valid question, simply because it can be applied to just about every possible generalization out there on any subgroup of peoples. For every group there are some that are dangerous, and are caught breaking the law. As foresthill suggested, you could replace words in your statement with any other group of people and construct the image that every member of that gro…
/r/MensRights27/10/11 07:20 PM
10

In fact, a common trait among pedophiles that are found out and charged is the rationalization and self-delusion that they are not harming children when they molest them. It's a catch 22. If pedophiles never act out on children, or get caught electronically, then they would have no reason to risk going to any medical professional. The ones that get caught breaking the law, that do get a chance talk to professional may rationalize that they're not harming children. It's like going to a Verizon Mo…
/r/MensRights27/10/11 04:55 PM
-1

Bullshit. Eryemil said that you did nothing to protect his ability(freedom of speech) to say what he wanted. Unless you were a WWII vet, in which case you actively participated in the defense of the US. You respond by saying that you were involved in the Bosnian conflict...which has nothing to do with defending the US. That was most definitely a red herring; redirection of a discussion to something that is not pertinent in an attempt to distract the participants from the subject at hand. I respe…
/r/MensRights15/10/11 07:59 PM
4

Red herring.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 04:16 PM
0

You don't know the intricacies of the circumstances which led to the kid killing himself so stop being a know it all airhead. I find it difficult to take the rest of your comment seriously when you're filling it with these ad hominem attacks. You're using appeals to emotion to argue against a fully logical argument for personal responsibility. He WAS weak by every single definition of the word. Show otherwise. He was so affected by the people around him, so weak in his belief and resolve to live…
/r/MensRights30/09/11 06:11 PM
-1

I feel very strongly about the concept of personal responsibility. People are too quick to blame others for their problems, and tend to be too lazy to take matters into their own hands and fix whatever is bothering them. This boy tried, with his anti-bullying activism. Unfortunately, he tried to fix the world around him before fixing the turmoil within him. I feel very sorry for his parents. Losing a child is never easy.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 02:21 PM
-10

and tweeted: “Bullying must become illegal. It is a hate crime.’’ No. This isn't a men's rights issue. I have absolutely ZERO tolerance or sympathy for weakness. Male or female, weakness is their own fault, and their own to be rectified. Physical weakness: work out, get training, buy a gun, and learn how to use it. If you are incapable of physical strength, make up for it with mental strength and intelligence. Mental weakness: toughen the fuck up, meditate, figure out how you tick to that you ca…
/r/MensRights30/09/11 03:48 AM
21

Stop thinking like a highschooler. Just go to the damn seminar, walk out when it's done.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 03:23 PM
2

Not to me. I gender swap stories often enough. This is still not significant.
/r/MensRights10/09/11 02:01 PM
2

Absolutely not. It doesn't matter what gender anybody was in this particular story, it's not significant. Gender swap all the him and his for she and hers...and it still isn't significant.
/r/MensRights10/09/11 02:00 PM
-3

"Realizing what I had done, I apologized for slapping and pushing him." Go search for that phrase. You suggesting that the people you send over there not even read her story, and to just search through her "wall of text" to find that situation. It's a shitty situation, and while she isn't justified in assaulting him, the police weren't involved, he wasn't physically hurt, and she ends up an emotional wreck while venting online. This honestly isn't really a mens rights issue at all. It's a story …
/r/MensRights10/09/11 02:52 AM
0

I'm not understanding. The internet is a public place no different than Times Square. If I walk out into a mall without a mask, anyone can take my picture or see me. If I post a picture on reddit, the same can happen. What right does anyone have to privacy in a public place?
/r/MensRights25/08/11 02:00 PM
8

How is it violating someone privacy if they are in a public place?
/r/MensRights25/08/11 12:24 PM
1

I'm a proponent of the betterment of the species through eugenics. It isn't about the development of a caste system. It's about the elimination of genetic diseases and defects with continuously tax our healthcare system and our development in general. Major genetic diseases are transmitted through breeding. We're not talking about Trisomy 21 here which is just a fluke from fertilization, but serious diseases that, with time, could be eliminated through selective breeding or artificial modificati…
/r/MensRights26/07/11 09:22 PM
1

Indeed! I can't wait. I fell in love with the world that was depicted in the film Gattaca, and even now as I struggle with PCR optimization in my own research, I'm hopeful that one day all one would need to do is toss a cheekswab into a machine and out pops a full analysis of their genome.
/r/MensRights26/07/11 07:48 PM
-2

I don't think you have the faintest idea about how genetics work, or diseases in general. At all.
/r/MensRights26/07/11 07:34 PM
2

Medical professionals are very rarely that careless. In your particular example, it is nearly impossible to confuse lung cancer with asthma. Everything from blood tests, to even putting a stethoscope to the chest yield such drastically different numbers and sounds that this can't happen. Fact of the matter is that having a medical history of the family helps with deciding courses of action for treatment. It allows doctors to select a number of alternatives that are least likely to cause problems…
/r/MensRights26/07/11 07:13 PM
3

Knowing the child's DNA can show if it has a pre-disposition to certain diseases and disorders. No. The basic DNA paternity tests are relatively simple proceedures that can be done in the course of a day or two. Can be done for about $200-600 depending on the level of accuracy necessary for court purposes. The extensive tests done to go through the entirety of DNA for specific genetic diseases and predispositions could take weeks and many thousands of dollars.
/r/MensRights26/07/11 07:09 PM
2

His situation was self inflicted, does that still make him a "victim"?
/r/MensRights21/07/11 02:16 PM
2

No thanks. He's an attention seeker, behaving like a teenager. Fully unwilling to help himself. Fully self depreciating. He won't ever hurt himself because he's too much of a coward to do so. I'm willing to bet money on the idea that his family has abandoned him. Any friends he's ever had have left him because they can't put up with his crap anymore. There's probably a good chance that at some point some women may have become interested, but his terrible attitude pushed them away. Nothing you sa…
/r/MensRights21/07/11 01:04 AM
-1

Why?
/r/MensRights14/07/11 04:17 PM
15

I'm sorry that you feel that way.
/r/MensRights01/07/11 03:26 AM
2

She should be executed...not given free room and board for the rest of her life.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 04:26 PM
-2

Yes it is. Also your title has a flaw called "Appeal to Authority". Since they're from doctors, it must be right. Attempting to prime us to automatically accept the article before we even read it. This article itself is bullshit at its finest.
/r/MensRights11/06/11 03:19 AM
0

What does being a mother have anything to do with her decision to have sex with people?
/r/MensRights26/05/11 09:01 PM
2

Did anybody here read the article? Especially the last line "The high court turned the case over to the Utah Court of Appeals, which has been asked to, in turn, return it to the trial court to reevaluate the issue." We should be upset that this is even being considered, but it has been rejected at two lower levels, over turned by the level above that, and then sent back down to two other levels for reevaluation. She can't use it for a defense yet.
/r/MensRights20/04/11 05:11 PM
1

The only mention of the father is Wayne County Circuit Juvenile Division Referee Leslie Graves ruled that the girl be kept in the custody of the state. Lawyers for Godboldo and the girl's farther, Mubaurak Hakim, are expected to appeal. That's it. This has nothing to do with men's rights. I have no idea why it's getting so many upvotes.
/r/MensRights07/04/11 03:40 PM
2

Edit: I removed my post once I came to the realization that OP is an asshole.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 08:17 PM
1

Listen. To family, to friends, to your girlfriend or wife.... If they're urging you to do something that you don't want to do, your response should be "Fuck off". It's that simple. Will they like it? No. Will they get over it? Yes.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 04:54 AM
0

edit: You're a troll. disregard my previous comment. Continue.
/r/MensRights03/03/11 09:33 PM
1

Damn straight. I don't have any respect for anyone with any sort of religious beliefs at all. I don't tolerate it. It's that simple. Couple that with this gender issue, and it's a done deal.
/r/MensRights18/02/11 02:21 PM
8

This isn't even close to a men's rights issue. 1)The sport handles gender equally. 2)The boy refused to wrestle her because it was against his religious beliefs to touch a female that way. 3)Rules state, that if you don't play your pair, then you do not advance. How in hell is this a men's rights issue? This is just a story of a religious homeschooled nut that was scared he'd get a hardon being that close to a woman.
/r/MensRights18/02/11 01:36 AM
1

Are you trolling or do you really believe this?
/r/MensRights16/02/11 06:28 PM
3

Getting laid > Not getting laid
/r/MensRights15/02/11 05:36 PM
3

Not necessarily. Here's why I say that. It could be a simple misinterpretation of common symptoms. The people that post problems online usually aren't trained medical professionals. Not only are the untrained notorious for mislabeling symptoms, they're also terrible at identifying the cause of these symptoms. Think about the vaccination misinformation epidemic, where mothers around the nation were claiming that vaccines were giving their children serious disabilities and other complications. NON…
/r/MensRights08/02/11 06:53 PM
5

Men'sRights /= Men only.
/r/MensRights08/02/11 02:46 PM
10

Reading a set of hundreds of opinions The problem of course is your data set. When people have complaints, especially young people that don't want to start a family yet, they go to the internet to complain. I'll bet real money that with every birth control method, the majority of opinions found on the internet (>50%) will be negative. The SAME can be said about any set of opinions found on the internet. Majority of Dell, HP, t-mobil, ATT, Verizon, users aren't satisfied. They'll bitch about cust…
/r/MensRights08/02/11 02:45 PM
4

17 is hardly considered childhood. She is not a kid. 5 is a kid. 10 is a kid.
/r/MensRights27/01/11 06:17 PM
6

I'm reminded of this story, not mine: When I was a kid, maybe 9 or 10, my brother and I used to get into fights. My mother had enough of our antics, and was at wits end with us. My brother was about a year younger than me, and as "the baby" of the family, he learned fast that he could gain favor by acting quite hurt and blaming me for the abuse. One busy day during the holidays, he pulled the same trick, and had a smirk on my face as my mother doled out her punishment of a smack and a grounding.…
/r/MensRights30/12/10 05:08 PM
1

Yes. And proud of it too.
/r/MensRights28/12/10 07:42 PM
-1

Are you a child?
/r/MensRights28/12/10 01:43 PM
8

I doubt he would have cut off the breasts of a 57 year old woman had she been dating his kid (male or female.)
/r/MensRights21/12/10 02:51 PM
2

How is this a men's rights issue?
/r/MensRights15/12/10 04:44 PM
9

Your username is a Lie.
/r/MensRights11/12/10 03:20 PM
0

What?? A grown man taking orders from someone else because "they said so"? Wow. What happened to people that stood up for themselves? What happened to people that responded with a "fuck you!" to aggressors? What happened to people that didn't take shit from anyone else?
/r/MensRights29/11/10 02:22 AM
10

I wasn't aware of an International Women's Day either...
/r/MensRights20/11/10 01:10 PM
2

Dude. I'm with you. I'm calling Solo413 out as an idiot.
/r/MensRights19/11/10 02:09 PM
7

Get a dictionary. Look up the word "medicine".
/r/MensRights19/11/10 01:10 PM
-6

There are a good number of cases where women have successfully petittioned officials to allow them to play on all-male teams. Football, hockey, and several other sports. Having a woman on a team gives the team a distinct disadvantage on the feild. They probably never should have let those girls anywhere on the feild during a game, much less on the team. She's taking valuable training time and resources from the rest of the guys who are clearly faster and stronger than her; a weak leg on an other…
/r/MensRights17/11/10 01:35 PM
22

I think this is a Civil Rights issue, not just a Men's Rights issue.
/r/MensRights11/11/10 04:17 AM
1

The theory of the political, economic, and social equality of the sexes While that may describe the text book definition, it in no way describes the current feminist movement which has flipped over to the suppression of males instead of the elevation of females. I support equality of the sexes, in finances, responsibility, freedom of choice in responsibility, in the workplace and in the courtroom. I don't support sexism, which is what the courts have been endorsing (males are guilty until proven…
/r/MensRights04/11/10 04:55 PM
2

Asian heterosexual Couples would the least threatening to OP. All other options based on races or sex carry too much risk.
/r/MensRights31/10/10 09:04 PM
6

White people, males especially, are more likely to be sociopaths and serial killers. It certainly isn't primarily due to genetics or skin color, but screening by skin color can be an effective method of screening out the most dangouers people. It's sad, but true.
/r/MensRights31/10/10 08:53 PM
8

It is! Because it's based on the premise that black people are more likely to cause her harm by virtue of their skin color (it's impossible for her to know anything more about them) What she should do is learn to protect her self (firearm training, deadbolts on doors, relocation of valuable items, possible security camera for the couch area, etc)
/r/MensRights31/10/10 08:40 PM
2

I do want a more feminine man... Without falling into semantics, the very use of the term "feminine man" simply reinforces my point, the girl's point, and OP's problem. Feminine meaning that the man shares more characteristics in personality and mannerisms with a woman than he does with a man. Which, by definition, makes him less of a man, and more of a woman. It doesn't make him less of a person, and most certainly doesn't make him less of a human, any more than a being a woman detracts from th…
/r/MensRights19/10/10 08:30 PM
2

I disagree that her beliefs are outdated. You cannot honestly expect everyone, and everything, to be perfectly gender neutral in all aspects.
/r/MensRights19/10/10 07:22 PM
3

While I don't like the term "real man", I think she's right. Someone who is a pushover isn't attractive really, male or female. Moreover, there are a lot of women that do want a dominant male in their lives. OP obviously isn't filling that role. She told him about her concerns instead of dumping him without warning, and now he doesn't know what to do. I don't think this belongs in MensRights simply because it really has nothing to do with suppressing male rights or undermining males in anyway re…
/r/MensRights19/10/10 03:03 PM
-1

Yes.
/r/MensRights13/10/10 12:00 AM
2

If you get a blowout at 98 mph, you will have less likelihood of controlling your car than if you get a blowout at 70 mph. And if you get a blowout at 70 mph, you will have less likelihood of controlling your car than if you get a blowout at 42 mph. Sure speed is a contributing factor, but the argument that you have less likelihood of controlling your car is weak, simply because that argument can be used at any speed under any condition.
/r/MensRights12/10/10 04:24 PM
2

Didn't you know? Guns kill people. Speeding kills people. That's why all police officers and hunters are dying off at unprecedented rates as well as the overwhelming majority of motorcycle and car racers. Forget about training. Forget about common sense and reasonable use. It just is.
/r/MensRights11/10/10 10:37 PM
4

Speeding does not endanger lives. The speed limit is set based on the 85th percentile rule, and has nothing to do with safety. There have been millions of dollars thrown at studies, surveys, and the resulting statistical analysis of that information. Speeding tickets are used as a means of revenue for the city and state, while the actual effect is a fear of police by the citizens. Reckless diving is something that should be enforced, not speeding. A jackass weaving in and out of traffic, cutting…
/r/MensRights11/10/10 07:20 PM
1

If I don't have an account, how would I know how long or intensive of a process it is to make one I just told you. Epic? Really?
/r/MensRights08/10/10 12:53 PM
4

In the time it took to write your two posts, you could have created one.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 10:21 PM
0

The husband and woman should have separate bank accounts to begin with. Expenses necessary for the household should be split 50/50 between the two of them regardless of their respective incomes. Nobody likes a dependent leech. What a person does with their own money is up to them.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 04:24 PM
5

Trolls. Nothing to do decide. Simply ignore.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 04:23 PM
6

Just stay out of jail, okay?
/r/MensRights07/10/10 04:22 PM
6

If he had the source, then he could fix it himself.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 04:20 PM
3

Source? Not because I don't believe you, but simply because I like to cite this stuff when going at it with someone else.
/r/MensRights26/09/10 12:24 PM
3

Don't be stupid. Recognize that in all suspicious deaths, the husband is the first suspect. Recognize that while police won't care about a dead homeless junkie that was suicided in a dark alley, they will care about a dead woman with 2 kids that just filed a domestic abuse charge and got a restraining order against her husband. Don't be stupid.
/r/MensRights26/09/10 12:22 PM
2

What state are you in? Ladies night, half off, or ladies free is still very rampant in a good number of bars, clubs, gyms, etc.... We still see those things, or maybe it just died in your state.
/r/MensRights23/09/10 03:09 PM
7

God forbid that a lesbian muslim get in there too to practice their freedom to lust. Or perhaps they think that homosexuality doesn't exist in Islam.
/r/MensRights23/09/10 03:07 PM
8

$30 says OP doesn't do shit or gives up half way through. I have paypal. PM me if you're on board.
/r/MensRights22/09/10 12:12 PM
2

In this case, there's no way for the court or police to know that it was a false allegation. The number of witnesses will be overwhelming. The girl said he hit her, the friend said he hit her, the undercover cop said he hit her, and then the officer will say that all three (and then some) said he hit her. With all of that, what jury wouldn't find him guilty? Perhaps we should walk around with camcorders running at all times.
/r/MensRights08/09/10 05:22 PM
-3

You are full of shit.
/r/MensRights01/09/10 06:38 PM
3

and finally ME: fuck that shit. If you hit me I will smile and dial 9-11 Do not be mistaken. If you call the police when a woman hits you, YOU will be arrested. They will take her word over yours nearly every time. Without any evidence to back hers up. Solution: don't call the police. They will fuck you up. Hightail it out of there.
/r/MensRights20/08/10 08:36 PM
1

Mixed in a specific ratio...
/r/MensRights05/08/10 11:14 PM
1

You're talking about a man that willingly put himself into this situation and refuses to use any sort of logic or reason when it comes to dealing with it. There have been 10 thousand Karma-points worth of bright sunny information and advice in this thread, and OP will be incapable of seeing it. If you've ever encountered these so-called "victims" of domestic abuse, you'll find the same mentality: a refusal to see the truth, and the delusion that they can't do anything about it. Moreover, any tim…
/r/MensRights15/07/10 02:43 PM
1

What I said was 100% true.
/r/MensRights15/07/10 01:27 PM
2

You're an idiot. There's plenty fucking reason to insult the guy. He's also being a full 100% idiot here and not thinking. I blame the "victim" when the victim is 100% responsible for being in his situation. I won't even offer my advice, because OP is too fucking stupid to listen to it anyway.
/r/MensRights14/07/10 09:15 PM
1

Fullest extent of what law? I do not know of any laws that specifically target the men and women that make false rape claims.
/r/MensRights09/06/10 11:23 PM
1

Does it really matter when you're caught? Smile and move on.
/r/MensRights09/06/10 01:23 PM
1

An attack dog with worthless against a bullet regardless of sex.
/r/MensRights24/05/10 12:22 AM
-2

How many women do you know pose a physical threat to most male police officers? Strength alone.
/r/MensRights23/05/10 11:59 AM
3

As a medical student, you did a piss poor job at researching the various techniques being targeted by the male birth control pill. There are a number of avenues used that are non-hormonal. Primarily focusing on any number of the steps in sperm maturation....which does have an off-switch.
/r/MensRights17/05/10 05:16 PM
0

Abstinance FTW? Years of awesome sex in exchange for a less than 2% chance? Sounds good enough for me. Also, abortions are readily available. The chances of that "2%" occurring more than once in your life are low.
/r/MensRights17/05/10 05:09 PM
1

Batman was a fucking pussy that never killed anybody. The bad guys kept coming back. Fuck that shit. In many situations, Batman caught these guys in the act. In those situations, Judge and Jury is a loaded 45.
/r/MensRights05/05/10 04:53 PM
3

Perhaps a forceful shove instead of a punch. If she slapped him in the face, then a punch to the gut would have been well justified.
/r/MensRights05/05/10 02:06 PM
0

Why didn't you copy and paste the short blog here? Downmod for blogspam. Second, it doesn't matter who it is, or why they were there. You were in someone else's house. They have 100% control (unless you are a LEO there lawfully) over whether or not you are permitted to be there. This is just a power game for her, and you should be able to see that. I do not know what problem you have here. There are no legal issues, short of trying to get full custody, what is the point of this? What is the prob…
/r/MensRights05/05/10 01:38 PM
2

I am of the opinion that if someone takes my one eye, I should take both of theirs. Permanently remove the threat, and serve as a warning to others.
/r/MensRights05/05/10 01:25 PM
1

If you see a man reading a "Maxim" on the bus, my advice for you is to get off at the next stop. Of course.
/r/MensRights05/05/10 01:14 PM
6

We would perhaps legalize gay marriage then to give them those rights.
/r/MensRights20/04/10 11:57 PM
3

Did you think somehow that they were equal? African Americans, blacks, Hispanics, and other minorities are often underprivileged by comparison to their white counterparts (do you really need me to bring the statistics here? Really?). Why shouldn't he reach out to those that are in more need? Look at your local university. Tell me what percentage of the resident students are minorities (exclude foreigners and out of state students). Compare that number to the percentage of minorities in your comm…
/r/MensRights12/03/10 02:13 AM
3

Mostly I was trying to figure out who she was to publicly humiliate the woman.
/r/MensRights26/12/09 09:16 PM
3

I'm sure a quite search or Minnesota university students on facebook can get you some answers. Surely word had spread around the dorms about who she is.
/r/MensRights26/12/09 09:09 AM
5

Fucking lunatics.
/r/MensRights23/12/09 05:16 PM
-16

Absolutely not. Having sex with someone other than your wife without her knowledge breaks the contract that is put in place by marriage. The PGA tour was his job. No different than someone restocking coke machines. His family life should be completely independent from his job. Having them going on tour with him is nice, but just as irrelevant and unimportant as a restocker that thinks he should carry his family with him on his job. The contract one makes with his wife is to stay with her for phy…
/r/MensRights22/12/09 08:34 PM
-15

Yes he does. He knew this was the risk when he cheated the first time, and he did it anyway...over and over again. He knew that this is how the laws in this country are set up, and he did it anyway. His first mistake was to get married. His second mistake was to have kids. Those are things he can deal with. What put the nail in the coffin was his complete disregard for his family, and his unfaithful behavior despite knowing that it could one day blow up in his face. Good riddance.
/r/MensRights22/12/09 08:14 PM
1

As I said elsewhere, I'm still concerned about my kids. Who knows what will happen? And if so, I'd want to be there. But due to what has occurred, wouldn't it be highly unlikely that you will ever be given custody of your children again regardless of the condition of the mother? Unless she gets killed in a car accident, and assuming that her family will not fight for custody, you can always fly back here to take care of them. The government has effectively severed all means that you could help y…
/r/MensRights22/12/09 07:19 PM
3

I've been reading this thread, and still can't figure out why you won't leave the country. Your life is ruined completely. What could possibly hold you here?
/r/MensRights22/12/09 01:45 PM
3

Why not sign a prenup?
/r/MensRights22/12/09 01:32 PM
-5

Oh? Men circumcised as babies cannot perceive those consequences, because they can't compare it to anything else. Men that are uncircumcised cannot claim to be better than those that were, because they also cannot compare it to anything else. Men circumcised as adults really cant argue anything because whatever they experience will simply be different from what their brain has been used to all their lives... Since it is impossible to "un-circumcise" a circumcised male completely, it would be imp…
/r/MensRights15/11/09 05:19 PM
-2

An action with no perceivable consequence is the same as an action with no consequence. A quiet sound below the threshold of human hearing will be the same as no sound at all for all intents and purposes.
/r/MensRights15/11/09 04:23 PM
-3

I cannot lose what I never remember having.
/r/MensRights15/11/09 12:08 PM
1

Why is this here? What does this have anything to do with MensRights?
/r/MensRights13/11/09 03:49 PM
-13

Well then. Slap her around. It's the only way.
/r/MensRights13/11/09 03:21 PM
7

, but clearly I couldn't let her trash her parents house when I had the ability to stop her. Wrong. It was absolutely not "clear" that you should have done this. The correct thing to do would have been to let her do whatever she wanted to do, then allow her to collect the legal consequences of her actions. Why? Because not only can she get the help she needs (via therapy or the reluctance to experience jail time again), but you will also avoid any possible legal rammifications of holding her dow…
/r/MensRights05/11/09 02:01 AM
3

Makes me wonder how/why she got the job in the first place.
/r/MensRights19/10/09 11:57 AM
7

Yes it is. It all has to do with equality of the genders in the eyes of society and the law. In the work place, a woman might pursue legal action against the company for not protecting her from perceived harrassment, and indeed might destroy the career of the man she believes is harrassing her. If the genders were reversed, most companies would laugh about it in the face of the male employee. There's probably not many lawyers that would take on a case like that either.
/r/MensRights26/09/09 02:10 PM
3

png...png...png...
/r/MensRights26/09/09 01:56 AM
1

As it should be~ I don't know why we both got downmods...
/r/MensRights11/09/09 01:53 AM
3

Interesting. Some women are just that crazy. I hope you've made it up to your father. Perhaps after seeing your mother in a different light you could learn something about dealing with difficult people.
/r/MensRights10/09/09 09:34 PM
1

Post docs.
/r/MensRights10/09/09 09:33 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter