| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A question concerning the views held here.Yeah, I definitely could've gone about it in a far better way. I didn't really set out to debate though. I basically just wanted to find out if people lean one way or another in terms of nature versus nurture. Although of course, the obvious tendency is pretty heavily towards nature. Just wanted to get into the specifics of it though. I'd rather not have a full, proper discussion about it because this is the internet and this relates to gender and that is a bad mix for a discussion in my opinion… | /r/TheRedPill | 02/10/14 01:28 AM |
| 1 | A question concerning the views held here.I never said there was anything wrong with the comment, and I certainly didn't say it was off-topic. I just get too emotionally involved in anything involving our modern view of communism. | /r/TheRedPill | 02/10/14 01:16 AM |
| 1 | A question concerning the views held here.While I'm afraid my education in such matters is the black market equivalent, I don't exactly propose social influence trumps biological instincts. I propose that while biological instinct is still certainly alive and well, the brain is far too much a convoluted creature to claim that things such as TRP biotruths are nearly as much a factor in society and the pursuit of happiness as TRP claims, because such is the decadent nature of our evolutionary process. But, thank you. I'm 70% sure you're t… | /r/TheRedPill | 01/10/14 12:42 AM |
| 0 | A question concerning the views held here.Ooooh boy I'm going to stop myself from commenting here because you mentioned the doomed nature of Marxism and nothing I say in reply could be on-topic or completely rational after that I'm afraid. | /r/TheRedPill | 01/10/14 12:36 AM |
| 0 | A question concerning the views held here.I thought I may as well have been honest about the hate thing. I thought perhaps it would give people an idea of how I'd potentially react if somebody, say, said I was in denial for disagreeing with a variety of the fundamentals of this subreddit while still posting this thread. The shaming tactics thing was just my idea of a joke I'm afraid. As for the rest, I'm not disputing the status of psychology as applied biology. I'm afraid I can be rather terrible at expressing myself sometimes. A bette… | /r/TheRedPill | 01/10/14 12:26 AM |
| 0 | A question concerning the views held here.I didn't mean it quite what it sounds like, I was basically referring to the genes that process has given rise to. It was definitely a mistake looking back to make such a stupidly literal reference. | /r/TheRedPill | 01/10/14 12:06 AM |
| 1 | A question concerning the views held here.My one request is that if I am to be banned, then someone should at least piss on this guys car for me. | /r/TheRedPill | 30/09/14 04:29 AM |
| 1 | A question concerning the views held here.Okay, we're playing this game are we? My turn! No, it isn't as simple as that. | /r/TheRedPill | 30/09/14 04:23 AM |
| 0 | A question concerning the views held here.While I am ready to change my hypotheses, I'm afraid you have at least in part misinterpreted them, which is probably my fault. Of course there is functional hard-wiring in our biology. But there's still plenty that, while represented in biology, are far more convoluted. For example, there's always the selfish gene. But perpetuating the selfish gene through the game, through high income? That isn't hard-wired, those are social constructs. | /r/TheRedPill | 30/09/14 03:42 AM |
| 1 | A question concerning the views held here.Well now, that's oversimplifying it a tad don't you think? Biology is the medium for social factors, yes. But there's plenty of things that can be done to someone, for example, to convince them that they are worthless, that have very little to do with biological imperatives. I don't believe in souls or anything like that, but I still wouldn't call that biology, in the same way I wouldn't call biology chemistry, or call chemistry physics. | /r/TheRedPill | 30/09/14 03:25 AM |
| 0 | A question concerning the views held here.Yes, I realise experience shapes biology, and biology determines experience. I am attempting to establish, apparently quite poorly, the line between the two when it comes to red pill views. If you take away hormones relating to gender, to what extent is experience still relevant in terms of the associations bound to gender? Over time, of course, gender would lose all meaning. But in the short term, would women still have the 'submissiveness' talked about here? Would they feel the need to tend to… | /r/TheRedPill | 30/09/14 03:16 AM |
| 1 | A question concerning the views held here.I don't believe it to be an abstract blob of energy at all. A better way of putting the question would be, in your ideas of gender, what is shaped by experience and what is shaped directly by biology. I fully believe that biology is the vessel for experience, I'm merely trying to ensure the topic doesn't enter the realm of hard biology, and instead concern itself with philosophy with a biological leaning. As for mentioning the hating TRP, I merely thought that it was somewhat relevant. Certainly… | /r/TheRedPill | 30/09/14 03:07 AM |
| -2 | A question concerning the views held here.I'm not curious about the answer to the question exactly, I'm curious as to how your answers fit in with other red pill views. | /r/TheRedPill | 30/09/14 03:03 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter